1. Technical Field
This disclosure relates electronic systems, such as data storage system. More particularly, the disclosure relates to non-binary low-density parity check (LDPC) decoders and decoding processes that use Trellis Maximization.
2. Description of the Related Art
Non-volatile memory arrays often have limited endurance. The endurance of the memory array is typically contingent on usage pattern and wear. In addition, the endurance depends on a type of the non-volatile memory array used. For example, memory arrays with multi-level cell (MLC) NAND media typically have a lower endurance than memory arrays with single-level cell (SLC) NAND media. To protect user data stored to memory arrays from corruption, which may be caused by a diminished endurance, user data can be encoded, for example, by generating parity data that can be stored along with user data to facilitate error detection and correction. However, retrieval of encoded data can be time consuming and resource intensive. Accordingly, it is desirable to provide more efficient mechanisms for decoding data.
Systems and methods disclosed herein will now be described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
While certain embodiments are described, these embodiments are presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of protection. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the scope of protection.
Overview
Data storage systems, such as solid state drives, typically include one or more controllers coupled with one or more non-volatile memory arrays. Depending on the type of non-volatile memory array used, stored data may be subject to corruption as a result of, for example, read/write disturbs, loss of data retention, and loss of endurance. Data storage systems can utilize one or more error correction and error coding mechanisms to detect and correct errors in the stored data. One such mechanism can determine parity data when writing user data. Parity data can be stored, for example, in a memory array. When stored user data is retrieved, parity data can be utilized as part of a decoding process to determine the integrity of the retrieved user data. If one or more errors are detected, such errors may be corrected.
One type of error correction or error coding mechanism that can be used by data storage systems to code data is low-density parity check (LDPC) codes. To manage LDPC coding, the data storage systems can include encoder and decoder modules that utilize the LDPC codes for decoding and generating parity data, respectively. LDPC codes can be decoded using a decoding matrix H and generated using a corresponding generating matrix G. In some embodiments, the decoding process performed by the decoder module can involve an iterative decoding process where values (for example, probabilities or likelihoods of belief) are passed between variable nodes and check nodes to decode data.
Data storage systems can implement binary and non-binary LDPC codes. In some embodiments, whether the data storage systems may decode or encode data using a binary LDPC code or non-binary LDPC code can, for example, depend on a number of memory states for a storage medium in which the data storage systems can store and retrieve data, whether multiple memory cells are grouped into a memory element, etc. For example, a data storage system can use binary LDPC codes for storing or retrieving data from one or more storage mediums including memory elements that store single bits of information, such as SLC NAND media which stores in a memory cell one of “0” and “1” values. A data storage system can use non-binary LDPC codes for storing or retrieving data from one or more storage mediums including memory elements that store multiple bits of information, such as MLC NAND media, SLC NAND media in which two or more memory cells are grouped into a single memory element, etc. For example, two-level or two-bit MLC NAND can store in a memory cell one of “00,” “01,” “10,” and “11” values.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed in part to a decoders and decoding processes that efficiently performs non-binary LDPC decoding. Such decoders and decoding processes can decode non-binary LDPC codes quickly and efficiently while utilizing little memory resources. In some embodiments, a check node update can be performed efficiently using Trellis Maximization (Trellis-Max) operation that generates and utilizes for decoding one or more trellises, such as Viterbi trellises. Disclosed decoders and decoding processes can perform decoding effectively with high speeds and low memory consumption. In addition, such decoders and decoding processes can operate effectively, particularly on channels having high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as in implementations that utilize limited precision for representing and storing data values. Further, as is explained below, such decoders can be easily implemented in hardware as operations required for implementing the decoding are limited to binary additions, limited precision subtractions, simple multiplications by a factor (which can be performed by bit shifters), and comparisons.
Disclosed decoders and decoding processes can be used in applications where data is transmitted over an unreliable (e.g., noisy) channel or where such transmission model is applicable. For example, disclosed embodiments can be used in data storage systems, such as solid-state drives, that store data in memory which may be prone to data corruption. Hence, the process of storing and retrieving data can be likened to a transmission over an unreliable channel. As another example, disclosed embodiments can be utilized in communications systems, such as mobile and wireless transmission systems. As yet another example, disclosed embodiments can be utilized in speech recognition systems.
System Overview
The controller 130 can be configured to receive data and storage access commands from a storage interface module 112 (e.g., a device driver) of the host system 110. Storage access commands communicated by the storage interface module 112 can include write data and read data commands issued by the host system 110. Read and write commands can specify a logical address (e.g., logical block addresses or LBAs) used to access the data storage system 120. The controller 130 can execute the received commands in the storage medium 140.
Data storage system 120 can store data communicated by the host system 110. In other words, the data storage system 120 can act as memory storage for the host system 110. To facilitate this function, the controller 130 can implement a logical interface. The logical interface can present to the host system 110 data storage system memory as a set of logical addresses (e.g., contiguous address) where user data can be stored. Internally, the controller 130 can map logical addresses to various physical locations or addresses in the storage medium 140 and other storage modules.
The controller 130 includes a decoder module 132 and an encoder module 134 configured to decode and encode data, respectively, stored in and retrieved from the storage medium 140. The encoder module 134 can encode stored data so as to protect the data from potential errors encountered during retrieval of stored data. The decoder module 132 can further perform error detection to determine integrity of data retrieved from the storage medium 140 and perform, if necessary, error correction of retrieved data. In some embodiments, when the storage medium 140 is comprises NAND memory that is early in its lifecycle and thus has relatively higher retention and endurance, the controller 130 can direct the encoder module 134 to encode data using a relatively higher coding rate so that less parity data is used. As the storage medium 140 wears out over time, the controller 130 can direct the encoder module 134 to switch to lower encoding rates such that more parity data is generated to protect stored user data from errors. The controller 130 can store the coding rates for encoded data in the storage medium 140 or another storage module (not shown) so that the decoder module 132 can later access the information to decode the encoded data. In some embodiments, the decoder module 132 and the encoder module 134 can respectively decode LDPC coded data and encode data using LDPC codes.
LDPC Decoder
The above matrix H has dimensions (n, m)=(8, 4) and is a sparse matrix. The dimension n can correspond to the number of bits or symbols in a code word (e.g., code word length) and dimension m can correspond to the number of parity bits or symbols. Any suitable parity check matrix can be used, such as any suitable sparse matrix having suitable dimensions that satisfy requirements of a particular channel.
In some embodiments, the decoder module 132 (or decoder 156) can decode data that may have been encoded using a non-binary LDPC coding. In data storage system application, for example, the decoder module 132 can read retrieved data from the storage medium 140 and calculate (or utilize pre-calculated) log-likelihood ratio (LLR) values, such as vectors of LLR values, to decode the retrieved data. In some embodiments, the decoder module 132 performs soft-decision decoding using the LLR values or any other suitable statistical or probability metrics. In other embodiments, the decoder module 132 can perform hard-decision decoding.
Non-binary LDPC decoding can involve iterative transfers of messages between variable nodes and check nodes.
In some embodiments, efficiency of decoding is improved. A set of variable nodes for which computationally intensive determination of messages to be sent back from check nodes can be reduced. For example, a subset of variable nodes can be selected based on one or more metrics. In some embodiments, the subset of variable nodes is selected based on a reliability metric of the variable nodes. One or more variable nodes can be determined to be unreliable, such as by comparing the reliability metrics associated with the variable nodes to a one or more reliability thresholds. The one or more unreliable variable nodes can be grouped into the subset for which more computationally intensive decoding is performed. For the remaining variable nodes (which are deemed to be more reliable), less computationally intensive decoding is performed. This approach can be more efficient than traditional non-binary decoding because the subset for which more computationally intensive decoding is performed may include smaller number of variable nodes than the entire set of variable nodes.
In some embodiments, each message, such as log-likelihood ratio (LLR) vector of size q, from variable nodes to check nodes can be normalized (e.g., divided) by the largest value and permuted by the corresponding element of the parity check matrix H. The normalization is a simple subtraction in logarithmic (or log) domain. After normalization, one of the elements in the vector becomes zero (e.g., the element corresponding to the largest value) and the remaining elements become negative. Based on a comparison using the second maximum value of each LLR vector from each permutation node, the set of variable nodes connected to a check node (e.g., set of size dc) is can be divided into two subsets: VITERBI-SET and VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT of sizes VS and VSC respectively (VS+VSC=dc). The two subsets can be mutually exclusive. In some embodiments, VS and VSC can be any suitable integer number. In some embodiments, processing of these two subsets (e.g., determining messages to be sent to the variable nodes of the two subsets) constitutes performing check node updates.
In some embodiments, variable nodes assigned to VITERBI-SET can be variable nodes with small differences between their largest LLR values (e.g., 0 if normalized) and second largest LLR values (e.g., largest negative number if normalized). Variable nodes assigned to VITERBI-SET can be considered to be less reliable or unreliable (e.g., due to having unreliable information for decoding the message), and such variable nodes can be identified by comparing the difference between the largest and second largest LLR values to a reliability threshold. Variable nodes with large differences between their largest LLR values and second largest LLR values can be assigned to VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT. Variable nodes assigned to VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT can be considered to be reliable (e.g., due to having reliable information for decoding the message), and such variable nodes can be identified by comparing the difference between the largest and second largest LLR values to a reliability threshold, which can be the same or different threshold as the threshold used for identifying members of VITERBI-SET. In some embodiments, assignment of variable nodes assigned to the sets VITERBI-SET and VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT can be performed separately while performing separate decoding iterations. For example, suppose that on the first decoding iteration 5 variable nodes are assigned to VITERBI-SET and 15 variable nodes are assigned to VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT. On second (or subsequent) iteration, 4 variable nodes can be assigned to VITERBI-SET and 16 variable nodes can be assigned to VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT
In some embodiments, during performing of a check node update for the elements in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT, only Galois field (GF) element or index of the largest LLR value can be retained. For the elements in VITERBI-SET, Trellis-Maximization operations can be performed as explained below.
In some embodiments, the diagram 400 is generated by assigning the symbols (e.g., “00,” “01,” “10,” and “11”) to the left most nodes (e.g., nodes 402, 404, 406, and 408) and by considering the symbols as transitions for a fully connected trellis. The nodes in the trellis depicted in the diagram 400 can be fully connected by considering transitions between nodes, such as transitions corresponding to the symbols (e.g., “00,” “01,” “10,” “11”). For example, as is illustrated, node 402 corresponds to the symbol “00.” The ending node associated with transition “00” from node 402 can be determined by performing GF operation, such as addition. For instance, GF addition between “00” and “00” can correspond to performing exclusive OR (XOR) operation, which results in “00.” Accordingly, transition “00” from node 402 ends up at node 412 (which is corresponds to the symbol “00”). Similarly, transition “01” from node 402 ends up at node 414 (which corresponds to the symbol “01”), transition “10” from node 402 ends up at node 416 (which corresponds to the symbol “10”), and transition “11” from node 402 ends up at node 418 (which corresponds to the symbol “11”). As another example, transition “11” from node 414 (which corresponds to the symbol “01”) ends up at node 426 (which corresponds to the symbol “10”), as XOR (01, 11) equals to 10. In various embodiments, GF addition can correspond to any suitable operation, not necessarily XOR. In certain embodiments, any suitable GF operation can be used for constructing the trellis.
In some embodiments, check node update process is as follows:
1) Initialize the variable nodes with costs corresponding to LLRs from the channel (e.g., memory storage).
2) Construct the vectors of [LLR00, LLR01, LLR10, LLR11] and normalize them by subtracting the largest value (e.g., division corresponds to subtraction in log domain). For example, assuming LLR01 to be the largest value, subtraction results in vector: [LLR00-LLR01, 0, LLR10-LLR01, LLR11-LLR01].
3) Find the second largest value (e.g., largest negative value, which can be smallest absolute value).
4) For each row of the H matrix from 1 to m
For example, suppose that the parity check matrix H has m check nodes, n variable nodes where the degree of each check node is twenty (e.g., dc=20) over Galois field of size 4 (e.g., GF(4)). In addition, suppose that VS is set as 4 and VSC is set as 16, which means that four of the least reliable messages from variable nodes are included in VITERBI-SET. Further, suppose that the LLR values (which may be permuted) received from the twenty variable nodes connected to a given check node are illustrated in table 500A of
Continuing with the above example, variable nodes can be separated into VITERBI-SET and VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT subsets. Columns containing the largest four negative values (or smallest four absolute values) are selected and designated as least reliable ones. These columns correspond to variable nodes that become part of VITERBI-SET. Referring to table 500B of
In some embodiments, Trellis-Maximization operation can be performed on the elements of VITERBI-SET (e.g., unreliable set) as follows. The symbols for and LLR values assigned to the variable nodes in VITERBI-SET are used to generate a trellis, such as, trellis illustrated in diagram 400 of
Trellis Maximization operation can use the trellis 400 and/or 600 (e.g., traverse the trellis) to determine a smallest or minimum cost to arrive at the last variable node in the trellis. The cost can be based on the path selected for traversing the trellis, and the cost can correspond to a measure of reliability (e.g., minimum cost can be correspond to maximum reliability). In some embodiments, in order to determine the minimum cost, Trellis Maximization operation performs summation of the weights assigned to the starting node with the weight of the transition between the starting node and destination node. For example, the following values can be obtained by performing addition for the transitions between each of nodes 602, 604, 606, and 608 and destination node 612: {−12.98, −15.55, −1.67, −0.90}. Trellis Maximization operation can select the maximum value (e.g., smallest absolute value), which can correspond to the most reliable value, to assign as weight to the destination node 612. Selecting the smallest absolute value can help to avoid overflow and saturation problems on fixed-point platforms. In the above example, value of −0.90 can be assigned as the weight for the destination node 612. In other embodiments, any other suitable liner or non-linear operation can be performed on the weights to determine the weight of the destination node.
For the above example in table (1), the result of the Trellis Maximization operation (e.g. the result of using or traversing the trellis) can be:
In some embodiments, variable nodes in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT (e.g., set of reliable variable nodes) are processed as follows. Indices (or symbols) corresponding to the largest normalized LLR values in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT can be added together. For example, the index corresponding to the largest normalized LLR value for variable node 1 (e.g., column 1 of table 500B) is “11” (corresponding to normalized LLR value of 0.00 in table 500B). As another example, the index corresponding to the largest normalized LLR value for variable node 2 (e.g., column 2 of table 500B) is “01” (corresponding to normalized LLR value of 0.00 in table 500B). Continuing with the rest of variable nodes, the indices illustrated in the table 700 of
In some embodiments, messages are generated and sent back to variable nodes that are members of VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT (e.g., reliable nodes) as follows. The result of Trellis Maximization operation (vector (2) above) can be modified by the index from table 700 corresponding to a particular variable node. For example, for variable node 1, the index of maximum normalized LLR value is “11.” This index can be excluded from modification of the result of Trellis-Maximization operation. The result of Trellis-Maximization operation is a vector of normalized LLR values corresponding to indices (or symbols) {“00,” “01,” “10,” “11”} respectively. For instance, LLR value of −0.90 in the result (vector (2) above) corresponds to index “10.” To determine message to send back to variable node 1, the indices of the result of Trellis-Maximization operation (vector (2)) can be modified by GF-adding a combination of all indices corresponding to the variable nodes in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT (table 700) with the exception of the index corresponding to variable node 1 (e.g., index “11”) to the indices of the result vector (2). In this example, assuming that GF addition corresponds to XOR operation, the combination of all indices with the exception of the index corresponding to variable node 1 is “11.” Performing GF-addition (which, in this example, corresponds to an XOR operation) the modification can result in the index set {“11,” “10,” “01,” “00”} (e.g., XOR(“01,” “11”)=“10”). The result of Trellis-Maximization operation is permuted or shuffled to match the order of indices in the above permuted index set as is illustrated below in vector (3). For example, normalized LLR value of −0.90, which in vector (2) is associated with the index “10,” is put in the second slot to match the order of indices in the permuted index set.
The following message can be sent back to variable node 1:
where α1 is a suitable value that can be selected and optimized in advance. For example, α1 can be a value less than 1, such as 0.6, 0.7, etc., or a value greater than 1. In one embodiment, α1 is 0.65. Similar approach can be used for determining messages to send back to other variable nodes 2, 3, 5-12, and 14-18 in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT.
In some embodiments, messages for sending back to nodes of VITERBI-SET (e.g., unreliable nodes) are determined as follows. Trellis Maximization operation can be performed on the elements of VITERBI-SET with the exception of the element (or node) for which the message is being determined. Excluding such node can result in canceling the effect of the node on the LDPC check node update operation. For example, assume that return message is being determined for variable node 20. Trellis Maximization operation can be performed using LLR values corresponding to variable nodes 4, 13, and 19 as follows:
The result of this operation can be modified (or permuted) by the index determined from processing VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT (e.g., the index stored as ME, such as “00” from the above example). This modification can be performed as described above in connection with generating messages to be returned to variable nodes in VITERBI-SET-COMPLEMENT. The following message can be sent back to variable node 20:
where α2 is a suitable value that can be selected and optimized in advance. For example, α2 can be a value less than 1, such as 0.6, 0.7, etc., or a value greater than 1. In one embodiment, α2 is the same as α1 (e.g., 0.65). Similar approach can be used for determining messages to send back to other variable nodes 4, 13, and 19 in VITERBI-SET.
Referring to
In some embodiments, as is illustrated in
The foregoing is intended to be illustrative and approaches disclosed herein can be further extended to a Galois field having any suitable (e.g., a Galois field of size eight, sixteen, etc.). In addition, approaches disclosed herein are not limited to use with two-level MLC and can be applicable to one-level SLC or MLC with any suitable number of levels (e.g., eight, sixteen, etc.). Degree of check nodes (e.g., code word length) is not limited to twenty and can be set to be smaller or greater than twenty depending on the application, and number of unreliable nodes in VITERBI-SET is not limited to four and can be set to be smaller of greater than four depending on the application.
In block 1204, the process 1200 constructs a trellis based on the second set of variable nodes. In block 1206, the process 1200 uses the trellis to determine a message. For example, as explained above, the process 1200 can use the trellis to determine a minimum cost of traversing the trellis from starting to ending variable node. In block 1208, the process 1206 uses the determined message to determine a first set of messages to be sent from the check node to the variable nodes in the first set. The process 1200 can send the first set of messages to the variable nodes in the first set. In block 1210, the process 1200 determines a second set of messages to be sent from the check node to the variable nodes in the second set. The process 1200 can send the second set of messages to the variable nodes in the second set.
Disclosed embodiments of non-binary decoders, such as non-binary LDPC decoders, can increase decoding efficiency when compared to traditional approaches for non-binary decoding. Disclosed embodiments can exhibit low memory use, high speed, good performance especially in high SNR environments, good performance even in limited precision implementations, and the like. Disclosed decoders can be easily realized or implemented in hardware by using simple operations, such as binary additions, limited precision subtractions, simple multiplications by a factor (which can be realized using bit shifters), and comparisons. Performance loss due to dividing the set of incoming messages into subsets of reliable and unreliable nodes can be negligible and efficiency can be greatly improved.
Although some embodiments of this disclosure may have been described using data storage systems or controllers for non-volatile storage media as examples, the disclosure can further apply to other environments and applications where data coding is utilized. For example, the disclosure can apply to technologies where a binary or non-binary LDPC codes are used. In one such example, the disclosure can be used for decoding communication channels in telecommunications systems, for instance, such mobile communications, wireless communications, etc. In some embodiments, statistical or probability metrics in addition to or instead of log likelihood ratios can be used.
The actual steps taken in the disclosed processes, such as the processes illustrated in
While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the protection. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the protection. For example, the various components illustrated in the figures may be implemented as software and firmware on a processor, ASIC/FPGA, or dedicated hardware. Hardware components, such as processors, ASICs, FPGAs, and the like, can have logic circuitry. Also, the features and attributes of the specific embodiments disclosed above may be combined in different ways to form additional embodiments, all of which fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Although the present disclosure provides certain preferred embodiments and applications, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments which do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein, are also within the scope of this disclosure. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is intended to be defined only by reference to the appended claims.
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/936,277 entitled “NON-BINARY LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK (LDPC) DECODING USING TRELLIS MAXIMIZATION” filed on Feb. 5, 2014, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6163581 | Kang | Dec 2000 | A |
6856556 | Hajeck | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7126857 | Hajeck | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7430136 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447807 | Merry et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7502256 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509441 | Merry et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7596643 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7653778 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7685337 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685338 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685374 | Diggs et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7733712 | Walston et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7765373 | Merry et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7898855 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912991 | Merry et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7936603 | Merry, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962792 | Diggs et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8028216 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8078918 | Diggs et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090899 | Syu | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8095851 | Diggs et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108692 | Merry et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8122185 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127048 | Merry et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8135903 | Kan | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8151020 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161227 | Diggs et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8166245 | Diggs et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8181081 | Yeo et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8243525 | Kan | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8254172 | Kan | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261012 | Kan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8296625 | Diggs et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312207 | Merry, Jr. et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316176 | Phan et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8341339 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8375151 | Kan | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8392635 | Booth et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397107 | Syu et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8407449 | Colon et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8423722 | Deforest et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433858 | Diggs et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8443167 | Fallone et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8447920 | Syu | May 2013 | B1 |
8458435 | Rainey, III et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8458556 | Planjery et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478930 | Syu | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8489854 | Colon et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8503237 | Horn | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521972 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8549236 | Diggs et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559540 | Sun et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583835 | Kan | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8595590 | Vojcic et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8601311 | Horn | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8601313 | Horn | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612669 | Syu et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612804 | Kang et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8615681 | Horn | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638602 | Horn | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8639872 | Boyle et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8667361 | Varnica et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683113 | Abasto et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8700834 | Horn et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700950 | Syu | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8700951 | Call et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8706792 | Moon | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8706985 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8707104 | Jean | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713066 | Lo et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713357 | Jean et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8719531 | Strange et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8724422 | Agness et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8725931 | Kang | May 2014 | B1 |
8745277 | Kan | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751728 | Syu et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769190 | Syu et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8769232 | Suryabudi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775720 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782327 | Kang et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8788778 | Boyle | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8788779 | Horn | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8788880 | Gosla et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8793429 | Call et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20100174849 | Walston et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100250793 | Syu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110087946 | Planjery et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099323 | Syu | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110283049 | Kang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120260020 | Suryabudi et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278531 | Horn | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284460 | Guda | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324191 | Strange et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130132638 | Horn et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145106 | Kan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130290793 | Booth et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140059405 | Syu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140101369 | Tomlin et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115427 | Lu | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133220 | Danilak et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136753 | Tomlin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149826 | Lu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140157078 | Danilak et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181432 | Horn | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140223255 | Lu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Declercq, D.; Fossorier, M., “Decoding Algorithms for Nonbinary LDPC Codes Over GF ,” Communications, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 633,643, Apr. 2007. |
Declercq, D. and Fossorier, M. “Extended minsum algorithm for decoding LDPC codes over $GF(q)$”, IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, 2005. |
Hongzin Song; Cruz, J.R., “Reduced-complexity decoding of Q-ary LDPC codes for magnetic recording,” Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 1081,1087, Mar. 2003. |
Voicila, A.; Declercq, D.; Verdier, F.; Fossorier, M.; Urard, P., “Low-complexity decoding for non-binary LDPC codes in high order fields,” Communications, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 1365,1375, May 2010. |
Voicila, A.; Declercq, D.; Verdier, F.; Fossorier, M.; Urard, P., “Low-Complexity, Low-Memory EMS Algorithm for Non-Binary LDPC Codes,” Communications, 2007. ICC '07. IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp. 671,676, Jun. 24-28, 2007. |
Wymeersch, H., Steendam, H. and Moeneclaey, M. “Log-domain decoding of LDPC codes over GF(q)”, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., pp. 772-776 2004. |
Savin, V. “Min-max decoding for non binary LDPC codes”, IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, 2008. |
Kasra Vakilinia, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,511, filed Mar. 31, 2014, 30 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61936277 | Feb 2014 | US |