The present application relates to armor, and more particularly to a lightweight armor panel system which integrates ballistic protection into load bearing structure.
Composite panels may incorporate honeycomb (HC) cores for the fabrication of aerospace structures due to their advantageous strength to weight ratio. Honeycomb core composite articles include upper and lower composite skins, i.e., fiber reinforced resin matrix laminates that are separated and stabilized by the HC core. Advanced sandwich core materials may replace or complement conventional HC cores to separate and stabilize composite skins.
The high strength and low weight of such sandwich construction results in lower overall aircraft system weight. Although high in strength and low in weight, composite panels provide little ballistic protection.
Conventional armor systems for aircraft are often a type of appliqué armor in which parasitic armor, such as steel or ceramic plates are placed over existing aircraft structure in critical areas so as to defeat small arms fire. Although effective, these parasitic solutions may result in added weight which may reduce mission capabilities.
An armor panel according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a multiple of pins which penetrate a first skin, a high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material layer and a second skin.
An aircraft according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a structural panel mounted to an airframe, the structural panel includes a high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material layer.
A method of armoring an aircraft according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes mounting a structural panel to an airframe, the structural panel includes a high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material layer.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
With reference to
The structural armor system 28 or 34 as defined herein provides an integrated solution wherein the armor protection is integrated into load bearing structure to provide ballistic protection and a more optimized lightweight solution to maximize mission capability. It should be understood that armor panels 34 for a rotary-wing aircraft are described only for illustrative purposes in the disclosed embodiment and that various armored panels including appliqué armor, wall panels, seat panels, housing structures and the like will also benefit from the present invention. With the integration of armor into the load bearing structure itself, ballistic protection of the occupants and crew is provided while the total weight of the integrated armor-structure system is reduced as compared to parasitic armor systems. The weight reduction over current parasitic armor systems effectively increases the payload and range of the intended mission. It should be understood that other components, which are to be armored for other reasons, such as a gas turbine engine fan blade containment system will also benefit herefrom
With reference to
The skins 36A, 36B may be manufactured of a structural material such as S2 glass composite fibers in API SC-15 toughened epoxy resin, carbon, Kevlar ceramic fibers, or other fibers. Alternatively, the skins 36A, 36B may be of a metallic alloy material such as sheets of titanium, steel or aluminum. It should be understood that each skin 36A, 36B may be manufactured of a different or equivalent material.
The skins 36A, 36B may be formed to surround the carrier 40 and define, for example, a flange edge structure 38 which facilitates mechanical attachment to the airframe 14, 24, or 26 through fasteners which are located through the flange edge structure 38. Alternatively, the flange edge structure 38 may be formed by additional layers which surround or otherwise attach to the skins 36A, 36B. It should be understood that other or no flange edge structures need be formed by the armor panel 34.
The carrier 40 may be manufactured of a high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material layer such as Dyneema™ that has ballistic capability but little structural strength. Alternate high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite materials include Spectra®, which provides polyethylene fibers that offer significant strength combined with minimum weight. The high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material operates, for example, as a spall shield that traps projectile and fragments.
The pins 42 extend through the carrier 40 and penetrate the skins 36A, 36B to form a truss-like structure. Such sandwich panel-like construction operates by the separation and stabilization of the relatively thin skins 36A, 36B with the pins 42. This forms a section with a large moment of inertia (parallel axis theorem) to resist bending loads such that the carrier 40 stabilizes the pins 42 to resist buckling. That is, the carrier 40 stabilizes the pins 42 even through the carrier 40 provides minimal inherent structural strength. Alternatively, the pins 42 could be bonded to the skin 36A, 36B. In operation together, the system provides a rigid structural panel with inherent ballistic tolerance in a relatively light weight panel.
The pins 42 may be manufactured of a non-metallic material or a metal alloy. The pins 42 are elongated members which may include sharpened ends 44 which facilitates piercing of the carrier 40 and the skins 36A, 36B. It should also be appreciated that although a particular shape of pins with particular shaped ends are disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other pins will benefit herefrom. It should also be appreciated that the pattern of the pins and the number thereof may be tailored to accommodate various strength and stiffness requirements. The truss-like or other structure of the pins 42 may provide further ballistic resistance and operate essentially as a slat armor to deflect or otherwise break-up projectiles.
With reference to
With reference to
In one non-limiting embodiment, a method of assembly inserts the pins 42 into the high molecular weight polyethylene fiber composite material when the material is unconsolidated as pre-preg ply layers to facilitate receipt of the pins 42 which are inserted to extend above the surfaces thereof. The pre-preg plys may then consolidated under heat and pressure to form a non-structural assembly. The consolidated carrier 40 with formed in pins 42 is then skinned with the skins 36A, 36B to interlock the skins 36A, 36B with the pins 42 to provide a bond/mechanical lock therebetween and form the final structural panel.
In another non-limiting embodiment, a method of assembly presses the pins 42 through an assembly of unconsolidated pre-preg ply layers of the carrier 40 and skins 36A, 36B. The entire assembly is then consolidated under heat and pressure to form the final structural panel.
With reference to
The fan blade containment assembly 100 generally includes an inner structure 104, the generally annular armor panel 34A, and an outer case 106 defined about an engine axis A (
With the integration of armor into the vehicle structure itself, the ballistic protection of the occupants and crew is provided while the total weight of the armor-structure system may be reduced as compared to parasitic armor systems. That is, the armor panel 34 provides a reinforced composite architecture that tightly couples ballistic and structural face sheets with ballistic fibers and resins as the core stabilizing material. It should be appreciated that although the armor panel 34 may be heavier than an un-armored structural honeycomb panel—typically twice to ten times as heavy—the armor panel 34 disclosed herein is still typically lighter than parasitic armor systems which are applied over un-armored structures.
It should also be appreciated that the armor system of the instant invention may be utilized in fixed wing aircraft, ground transportation vehicles, personal body armor, etc. and that various panel sizes, layer combinations and depth of layers may be utilized and specifically tailored to the desired element which is to be armor protected.
It should be appreciated that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
It should be appreciated that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be appreciated that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be appreciated that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be appreciated that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
This invention was made with government support with the United States Army under Contract No.: W911W6-06-2-0001. The government therefore has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4732803 | Smith, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
5102723 | Pepin | Apr 1992 | A |
5343796 | Cordova et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5824411 | Shalaby et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5935680 | Childress | Aug 1999 | A |
6138275 | Sacks | Oct 2000 | A |
6139942 | Hartness et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6172163 | Rein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6612217 | Shockey | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7200912 | Bouillon et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7721495 | Kismarton | May 2010 | B2 |
7748119 | Kismarton | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8186262 | Farquhar et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8272188 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8869673 | Townsend | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030114064 | Fu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20110005328 | Hayford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009014973 | Sep 2010 | DE |
0056541 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for European Application No. 12182538.4-2124. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130055881 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |