The present invention relates to the storage and dispensing of materials which may be harmful, particularly if improperly ingested and, more particularly, to a container closure that is selectively manipulatable between a configuration which resists opening by children and a configuration which may be easily opened without special manipulation of the closure.
Child resistant closures are well-known and understood to be effective in preventing inadvertent access to potentially dangerous materials, such as medications, by children. However, inclusion of the child resistant feature on containers is costly, and all too often, makes it difficult and frustrating for an adult user to open the container, especially an adult who has suffered a loss of manual dexterity, as by arthritis. Because of deteriorating health, elderly persons tend to rely on medication more than the average person. The elderly may also tend to have impaired manual strength and dexterity. Due to the difficulty encountered by such persons in opening child-resistant packages, many elderly persons request a non-child resistant substitute. Alternatively, when medications are purchased in child resistant packages by older adults, the packages are oftentimes not reclosed by the user thus defeating the purpose of the child resistant feature.
The aforementioned problems are generally recognized by the packaging industry, particularly in connection with packaging for the pharmaceutical industry. Attempts to deal with this problem are also disclosed in the patent literature. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,514,003 granted to Fitzgerald on May 26, 1970 teaches a two-piece closure having a selectably engageable locking device which is engaged or disengaged by axial movement of a collar member relative to a cap member. The cap and collar members have respective sets of teeth which interlock when the collar member is moved axially upwardly into its uppermost position. The neck of the bottle also includes teeth which engage the collar member when the collar member is in the uppermost position, thus preventing rotation of the closure. To unlock the closure, the collar member is slid downward and out of engagement with the cap member. This closure visually reveals that the collar member may be moved out of engagement with the cap member. Accordingly, a child having sufficient strength to disengage the collar member may have sufficient intellect to defeat the interlocking engagement and remove the closure. Moreover, the disclosed closure arrangement is not readily adaptable to commonly available bottles and vials, such as those typically used by pharmacists for dispensing prescription medications.
Another attempt to overcome the aforementioned problem is disclosed by Do Le Minth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,148,931, granted Sep. 22, 1992, which teaches a two piece closure having two sets of axial channels on an inner cap and two sets of protrusions on an interior surface of an outer cap. The closure is opened by aligning the protrusions on the outer cap with the proper set of channels on the inner cap, pulling the outer cap up relative to the inner cap, and rotating the outer cap so as to interlock the outer and inner caps. Disadvantageously, the disclosed arrangement is mechanically complex, requiring the consumer to follow a lengthy procedure to return the closure to the child resistant state, if required. Moreover, the complicated closure structure is difficult and expensive to fabricate.
Still another attempt to overcome the aforementioned problem is disclosed by Buono in U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,934, granted Dec. 3, 1996, which teaches a convertible child resistant closure for a container. The closure includes coaxial inner and outer caps. The inner cap has a cover wall and a skirt depending therefrom. An outer surface of the skirt has a child resistant portion extending outwardly from the outer surface and made of a series of angular abutments, and a non-child resistant portion axially offset from the child resistant portion and comprising a row of longitudinally extending knurls. The outer cap has a cover wall and skirt. The inner surface of the skirt includes a child resistant region extending inwardly from the inner surface and having a plurality of angular abutments complementary to the angular abutments of the inner cap, and a non-child resistant region axially offset from the child resistant region and including a row of longitudinal knurls complementary to the knurls on the inner cap. The inner cap is axially moveable in the outer cap to select between the child resistant configuration and the non-child resistant configuration. As a result of the outwardly extending child resistant portion on the outer surface of the inner cap and the inwardly extending child resistant portion on the inner surface of the outer cap, a clearance space must be provided between the outer and inner caps to accommodate the child resistant portions. This can cause undesired play or cocking between the inner and outer caps.
It is thus desirable to provide an improved closure device that is selectively convertible between a child resistant configuration and an easily openable configuration allowing the user to choose the type of closure dependent upon the particular situation and environment in which the container is used.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved child-resistant closure for a container that is selectively convertible between a first position that provides a resistance to opening by children and a second, non-child resistance position that can readily be opened by adults, even adults having impaired manual dexterity in their fingers due to conditions such as arthritis, etc.
It is a further object to provide a closure for a container that can easily be converted at the point of packaging to provide either a child resistant configuration or an easy-to-open non-child resistant configuration, depending on the needs of the particular customer.
The present invention relates to a convertible child resistant closure for use with a container, which allows a user to select between providing the container with a child resistant closure and an easily openable closure depending upon the use and contents of the container. The closure includes co-axial inner and outer caps.
The inner cap is defined by a cover wall and a side wall or skirt depending from the cover wall. The side wall includes an inner surface engageable with the container neck, as by threads on the inner surface of the inner cap and on the neck of the container, and an outer surface including a child resistant portion comprising a series of angular abutments extending thereabout and a non-child resistant portion axially offset from the child resistant portion and preferably in the form of one or more protrusions or “balls” positioned on the outer surface of the skirt proximate the cover wall.
The outer cap has a side wall or skirt having a top edge and a bottom edge. An outer cap cover wall may optionally be provided which can be configured as an annular flange overlapping a periphery of the inner cover wall. The side wall includes an inner surface divided into a first or child resistant region and a second or non-child resistant region. The first (i.e., child resistant) region includes a plurality of angular abutment surfaces complementary to the angular abutments on the inner cap, and the second region is axially offset from the first and includes a row of sockets, each complementary to the one or more protrusions, to allow the protrusions to seat within the sockets, thereby angularly and axially locking the outer and inner caps to each other to allow them to be rotated together about the neck of the container for non-child resistant operation.
The inner cap is positioned within the outer cap and is axially movable between the first region, in which the angular surfaces on the inner cap engage the angular abutment surfaces on the outer cap to provide a child resistant closure, and the second (i.e., non-child resistant) region in which the balls engage the sockets to provide a non-child resistant closure.
The inner surface of the outer cap is also provided with an inwardly directed, restrictive projection defining a limit position of the second region. This projection defines a range of relative movement between the inner and outer cap members when positioned on a container and prevents the closure from being converted from the child-resistant configuration to the easy-to-open configuration when the closure is sealingly positioned on the container.
The abutment surfaces of the outer cap skirt are complementary to the angular abutments of the inner cap skirt so that, in the child resistant mode of operation, the angular abutments meet to cam the inner cap together with the outer cap whereby rotation of the outer cap in one direction also turns the inner cap to threadedly engage the inner cap on the container. When the outer cap is rotated in the opposite direction, i.e., the opening direction, and in the absence of an axial force on the outer cap in the direction of the inner cap, the plurality of abutment surfaces ratchet over the angular abutments, thereby preventing the rotation of the inner cap in response to rotation of the outer cap. However, by applying sufficient axial force to the outer cap toward the inner cap, such as by pressing downward on the annular flange of the outer cap, the plurality of abutment surfaces on the outer cap will be held in engagement with the angular abutments on the inner cap to impart rotation to the inner cap for removing the closure from the container.
When the protrusions or balls of the inner cap are seated in the sockets of the outer cap, the closure is in the easy-to-open, non-child resistant configuration, whereby both caps readily turn together without requiring a downward force applied to the outer cap flange, to open and close the container. Accordingly, with minimal effort, the outer and inner cap members may be turned simultaneously in either direction of rotation.
With reference to the angular abutments at the upper end of the inner cap, each of the abutments includes a sloped first surface and a substantially vertical second surface. The sloped first surface and the substantially vertical second surface meet to preferably define an angle in the range of about 30 degrees to 60 degrees therebetween, and most preferably about 45 degrees. As well, each of the plurality of abutment surfaces on the outer cap preferably define an angle with the vertical in the range of about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees and most preferably about 50 degrees.
Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a novel closure positionable between a first child resistant position and a second non-child resistant position is provided. Accordingly, depending on whether the user desires to have the closure in a child resistant position or non-child resistant position, the inner cap member may be moved relative to the outer cap member to the selected position.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a closure for a container is provided, the closure being positionable between a first child resistant position and a second non-child resistant position. The closure has an outer cap having an outer cap side wall with a top edge and a bottom edge, and having an inside surface that supports a cylindrical skirt axially offset from the top edge. The outer cap side wall includes an inner surface divided into a first, child resistant region and a second, non-child resistant region, with the first region including a plurality of angularly extending abutment surfaces, and the second region being axially offset from the first region and including one of a plurality of sockets and one or more protrusions. The closure also has an inner cap having a cover wall and an inner cap side wall depending from the cover wall, the inner cap side wall having an inner surface threaded for mating engagement with a threaded exterior surface portion of an opening of the container, and an outer surface including a child resistant portion comprising a series of angular abutments extending about the outer surface and a non-child resistant portion axially offset from the child resistant portion and arranged in the form of the other of the plurality of sockets and the one or more protrusions positioned on the outer surface of the inner cap side wall proximate the cover wall. The inner cap is configured so as to be nestable within the outer cap so that the outer cap side wall is coaxial with and peripherally surrounding the inner cap side wall. Each of the sockets is complementary to the one or more protrusions, such that the closure is movable between the second non-child resistant position of the closure, in which the protrusions are removably seated within the sockets, thereby angularly and axially locking the outer and inner caps to each other to allow the outer and inner caps to be rotated together about the neck of the container for non-child resistant operation, and the first child resistant position, in the which the protrusions are not seated within the sockets and in which the closure can only be opened by application of a rotational and axial force between the plurality of angularly extending abutment surfaces of the outer cap and the angular abutments of the inner cap.
In another aspect, the plurality of sockets are arranged in the second region of the outer cap and the one or more protrusions are arranged in the child resistant portion of the inner cap.
In another aspect, the angular abutments of the inner cap comprise saw teeth having angled surfaces.
In another aspect, the angularly extending abutment surfaces of the outer cap are angled in the same direction as the angled surfaces of the saw teeth of the inner cap.
In another aspect, a bottom edge of the outer cap side wall is configured as an inwardly-extending circumferential lip such that a reduced diameter of the outer cap is presented in the region of the lip, wherein the lip is deformable such that when the inner cap is positioned in the outer cap, by inserting the inner cap top wall into the outer cap end containing the lip, a threshold force must be applied so that the inner cap squeezes past the lip, thereby causing the lip to function as a yieldable stop to retain the inner cap inside the outer cap once the inner cap is so-positioned.
In another aspect, the closure is movable by a user of the cap between the second non-child resistant position and the first child resistant position by the user applying a sufficient upwards axial force to the inner cap relative to the top wall of the outer cap so as to dislodge the balls from the sockets and move the inner cap to a position above the lip of the outer cap and into the first, child resistant, region of the outer cap.
In another aspect, the one or more protrusions comprise four balls spaced apart from each other by 90 degrees.
In another aspect, in both the first child resistant position and the second non-child resistant position, the closure can be closed by application of a rotational and axial force between the threaded inner surface of the inner cap the threaded exterior surface portion of the opening of the container.
In another aspect, in the child resistant mode, application of a rotational force to the closure to open the container, without the application of a sufficient additional downward force to the outer cap, will cause the abutment surfaces of the outer cap to ratchet or ride over the angular abutments of the inner cap, inhibiting opening of the closure.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of the disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages, and specific objects attained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein like reference numerals identify similar elements throughout the several views:
As will be described in greater detail below, when the caps 12 and 14 are axially aligned and nested one within the other, selected exterior portions of the inner cap 12 engage corresponding interior portions of the outer cap 14. For this purpose, the inner cap 12 has a circular upper or top wall 16 and a cylindrical side wall 18 that depends therefrom, and the outer cap 14 has a side wall 43 having an upper edge and a lower edge (see, e.g.,
As best seen in
An exterior surface 26 of side wall 18 of inner cap 12 defines a radially outstanding lower skirt 28 on which is provided a series of upwardly projecting teeth 36. The skirt 28 shows the teeth as triangle-shaped or saw-toothed. As shown in
As seen in
The balls 68 are dimensioned to releasably lock within sockets, as explained below, and preferably extend outwardly from the side wall by an amount equal to a thickness of the triangular teeth 36. In a preferred embodiment, four balls 68 are spaced apart from each other by 90 degrees as shown in
As can be seen in
The bottom edge of the outer cap sidewall 43 is configured as an inwardly-extending circumferential lip 52 such that a reduced diameter is presented in the region of the lip, as shown in
As shown in
As seen in
Thus, when the inner cap 12 is positioned in the first or child resistant region 48 of the outer cap 14, as shown in
As can be seen, e.g., in
The balls 68 and sockets 58 are respectively positioned such that each of the balls 68 will seat in a corresponding socket 58, thereby locking the outer and inner caps (14, 12) together. When so-positioned, and as shown in
Operation in the various configurations of the convertible child resistant closure 10 of the invention will now be described with a reference to
Gripping of the outer cap 14 is facilitated by a plurality of vertically oriented knurlings 100 formed on the outer surface of the outer cap 14. Such knurlings can be seen in
It should be appreciated that although the above description and accompanying drawings are directed to an embodiment where the balls 68 are formed on the inner cap 12 and the sockets 58 are formed on the skirt 42 of the outer cap 14, a reverse configuration can be readily employed where the balls are formed on the skirt, and sockets formed in a ring on the inner cap and positioned for engagement with the balls.
To utilize the closure when in a child resistant position, the closure 10 is first placed on the threaded portion of the container by threadedly engaging the threaded surface 20 on inner cap 12 with the threaded portion of the container. A rotative force coupled with a downward force applied to the outer cap turns the outer cap 14 in the closing direction, here shown to be clockwise.
The vertical surfaces 34 of the teeth 30 on the inner cap 12 and abutment surfaces 46 on the outer cap 14 interengage to cause the inner and outer caps to turn together, e.g., to cause the inner cap 12 to remain rotationally stationary relative to the outer cap 14, to close the container. However, in the child resistant mode, rotation of the closure 10 in the opposite direction, i.e., in an attempt to open the container, without the application of a downward force to the outer cap will cause the abutment surfaces 46 of the outer cap 14 to ratchet or ride over the angled surface 32 of the teeth 30 of the inner cap 12. That is to say, the mere turning of the outer cap 14 in the opening direction will not rotate inner cap 12 in an opening direction because there is no transmission of torque from the outer cap 14 to the inner cap 12 as the abutment surfaces 46 ride over and slide by the angled surfaces 32.
To open the closed container 24 with closure 10 in a child resistant mode, the user must apply both a rotative and a downward axial force. Thus, when the outer cap 14 is rotated in an opening direction, here counterclockwise, while simultaneously applying both a rotational and a downward axial force, the abutment surfaces 46 of the outer cap 14 are prevented from ratcheting over angled surfaces 32 but instead engage one another to transmit torque between abutments 46 and angled surfaces 32 to thereby rotate the inner cap 12 causing it to disengage from the threaded portion 22 of the container 24.
One benefit from the closure described above and depicted in the figures is that by disposing the balls 68 on the inner cap (or outer cap) and the sockets 58 on the outer cap (or inner cap) and dimensioning both such components to be substantially the same thickness—e.g., the outward thickness of the balls with respect to the outer wall of the inner cap, and the outward thickness of the sockets with respect to the inner wall of the outer cap, etc.—the diameters of the caps can provide for a tighter fit, as compared to the prior art embodiments, thereby yielding a closure with decreased cocking between the inner and outer caps which can cause the cap to malfunction.
Each of the inner and outer caps is preferably unitarily formed from plastic materials using known molding techniques.
Although example embodiments have been shown and described in this specification and figures, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made to the illustrated and/or described example embodiments without departing from their principles and spirit.
This is a U.S. national stage of application No. PCT/US2017/18203, filed on Feb. 16, 2017. Priority is claimed on U.S. Application No. 62/296,389, filed Feb. 17, 2016, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/018203 | 2/16/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/143084 | 8/24/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3809272 | Maki | May 1974 | A |
3830394 | Lestaevel | Aug 1974 | A |
3853236 | Ostrowsky | Dec 1974 | A |
3915326 | Hrubesky | Oct 1975 | A |
3968894 | Herrmann | Jul 1976 | A |
4011960 | Mauvernay | Mar 1977 | A |
4519514 | Agbay | May 1985 | A |
5579934 | Buono | Dec 1996 | A |
6722513 | Flood | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7408843 | Brandon | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7703617 | Branson | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7819264 | Brozell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7988003 | Clodfelter | Aug 2011 | B1 |
9784979 | Crenko | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020027119 | Miceli | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040262251 | Tauber | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050150857 | Brozell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230341 | Dong | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090014404 | Russell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090120896 | Scarlata | May 2009 | A1 |
20100313527 | Jajoo | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110139742 | Brozell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20150076103 | Koller | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160031615 | Miceli | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20180229903 | Lee | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190144175 | Patton | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20120030495 | Mar 2012 | KR |
WO-2004063025 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2006098559 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200331666 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62296389 | Feb 2016 | US |