Non-contact support for cylindrical machining

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6450865
  • Patent Number
    6,450,865
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 7, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 17, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A support for supporting a work piece to be machined is provided. The support is for use in a machine adapted to receive fluid from a fluid source. The machine includes a tool for removing material from the work piece. The support includes a body defining a chamber therein and an inlet operably associated with said body. The inlet is in communication with the chamber. The inlet is adapted for communication with the fluid source. The support also includes an outlet operably associated with the body and in communication with the chamber. The outlet is adapted to provide a stream of fluid for supporting the work piece.
Description




The present invention relates to machining of cylindrical parts. More specifically, the invention relates to a process and apparatus for machining long slender shafts.




Components for machines and mechanical apparatuses are typically machined to obtain precision tolerances and accurate surface conditions. Machining of the precision surfaces are typically machined by presenting a cutting tool or a grinding wheel against the precision surface.




During machining common precision parts include cylindrical parts. Cylindrical parts or workpieces are rotated about centers found at the ends thereof or supported on the periphery of the workpiece. Cylindrical parts which are relatively soft, having a hardness of Rockwell “C” scale (R


c


) of 40 or less and which have medium tolerance requirements, for example ±0.002 inches in diameter tolerance, are typically turned on a turning machine with a cutting tool.




A lathe, for example, a numerically controlled lathe, is typically used to manufacture this type. of workpiece. The workpiece may be rotated about its centers by pressing in with centers on the lathe or, preferably, a portion of the outer periphery of the workpiece is clamped to provide sufficient torque required for the turning process.




More accurate or precision machining, i.e. for parts requiring a tolerance of less than +0.002 inches and/or for grinding materials having a hardness greater than, for example, 40 R


c


is typically performed on a grinding machine utilizing a grinding wheel. Grinding of precision workpieces is accomplished by rotating the workpiece simultaneously with rotating a cylindrical grinding wheel in contact with the outer periphery of the workpiece. The workpiece is typically rotated about centers found at the end of the workpiece on a machine called a center-type grinder or may be supported on the periphery of the workpiece by a regulating wheel and a rest blade. Such peripheral support for a workpiece is performed on centerless-type grinders.




Long slender shafts requiring precision surfaces that may require a turning or a grinding to be performed thereon are used extensively in machines that pass a substrate through the machine. The long slender shafts are utilized to guide and direct the paper substrate through the machine and/or for performing operations on the substrate. For example, copying machines and printing machines have large substrates in the form typically of paper. The substrate may be in the form of a roll of paper or in the form of cut sheets.




Long shafts and, in particular, long, slender shafts such as those made from durable materials such as steel, deflect under the grinding or cutting of the workpiece. The deflection of the shafts affects the quality of the shafts and the precision requirements required for such shafts may be very difficult to obtain.




Attempts have been made to improve the quality of long thin shafts, which are turned or ground by reducing the deflection of the shaft during machining. The most common tool utilized in reducing the deflection of long thin workpieces is a work support or steady rest. The part deflection due to the force of the grinding wheel or cutting tool or simply due to the mass or weight of the workpiece is counteracted by the support from the steady rest. A further function of the steady rest is to prevent workpiece vibration and thereby to eliminate or reduce chatter.




An understanding of the use of steady rest is more thoroughly described in


Modern Grinding Technology


by Salmon, the relevant portions thereof incorporated herein by reference.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, a prior art mechanically contacting steady rest is shown in FIG.


8


. The standard steady rest is typically a


2


or


3


point contact tool that holds the part rigidly in place. For example, the steady rest


1


includes three fingers


2


which include contact points


3


which are equally spaced about roll


4


. The fingers


3


are in contact with periphery


5


of the roll


4


and serve to support the roll


4


as it rotates about longitudinal axis


6


. The work support


1


is secured to machine base


7


.




In the well-known process of electrophotographic printing, a charge retentive surface, typically known as a photoreceptor, is electrostatically charged, and then exposed to a light pattern of an original image to selectively discharge the surface in accordance therewith. The resulting pattern of charged and discharged areas on the photoreceptor form an electrostatic charge pattern, known as a latent image, conforming to the original image. The latent image is developed by contacting it with a finely divided electrostatically attractable powder known as “toner.” Toner is held on the image areas by the electrostatic charge on the photoreceptor surface.




Thus, a toner image is produced in conformity with a light image of the original being reproduced. The toner image may then be transferred to a substrate or support member (e.g., paper), and the image affixed thereto to form a permanent record of the image to be reproduced. Subsequent to development, excess toner left on the charge retentive surface is cleaned from the surface. The process is useful for light lens copying from an original or printing electronically generated or stored originals such as with a raster output scanner (ROS), where a charged surface may be imagewise discharged in a variety of ways.




While shafts in electrophotographic printing for guiding substrates require accurate tolerances and may be long and slender, exasperating the accurate tolerance problems, the difficulties encountered in providing accurate donor rolls for scavengeless development systems is particularly acute.




In a scavengeless development system, toner is detached from the donor roll by applying AC electric field to self-spaced electrode structures, commonly in the form of wires positioned in the nip between a donor roll and photoreceptor in the case of hybrid scavengeless development or by applying the AC electrical field directly to the donor roll in the case of hybrid jumping development. This forms a toner powder cloud in the nip and the latent image attracts toner from the powder cloud thereto. Because there is no physical contact between the development apparatus and the photoreceptor, scavengeless development is useful for devices in which different types of toner are supplied onto the same photoreceptor such as in “tri-level”; “recharge, expose and develop”; “highlight”; or “image on image” color xerography.




Since hybrid scavengeless development relies on a continuous, steady toner powder cloud at the nip between the latent image and the donor roller, the speeds at which the rollers operate are significantly higher and the accuracy requirements are much more precise.




The purpose and function of scavengeless development are described more fully in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,868,600 to Hays et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,019 to Folkins, U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,367 to Hays, or U.S. Pat. 5,063,875 to Folkins et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,868,600 is incorporated herein by reference.




For proper operation of a donor roll in a hybrid scavengeless development, the diameter tolerance, runout and surface finish requirements of the donor roll are very critical and require very precise dimensions. Furthermore, donor rolls typically have a long length and a small diameter. For example, donor rolls may have a length of, for example, 18 to 24 inches and a diameter from 1 to 1½ inches. When machining donor rolls with such a length to diameter ratio of 20 to 1 or greater, the rolls tend to deflect during the machining process. To complicate the situation, donor rolls may be made of a hard ceramic material which is difficult to machine. Because of the high tolerances and hard material, the donor rolls are often ground rather than turned. The grinding forces are typically higher than turning forces, thus causing the deflection during machining to increase.




Attempts have been made to reduce the deflection of rolls during the machining process. For example, mechanical supports are fixedly positioned underneath the roll during the machining process. These types of supports come in two particular designs. The support may be in the form of a steady rest which is fixedly positioned with respect to the roll and in the form of a follower rest which is mounted to the machining tool slide and moves with the material removal tool.




Mechanically contacting steady rests and follower rests have several problems. Mechanical steady rests consist of three equally spaced contact points against the roll as it is machined. Since the contact points typically in the form of pads or rollers are fixedly set, the contact points must be set to, for example, the unmachined dimensions and during the machining the contact points separate from the now-machined dimensions permitting the roll to deflect slightly under the machining forces.




The mechanically contacting steady rests and follower rests must be readjusted for each particular roll size that is to be machined on the machine. The contact points must be adjusted to contact the workpiece so that any change in the part diameter of a workpiece requires a changeover to the mechanical work support or steady rest setup. Furthermore, the setups are very difficult because selecting the optimum work. support setting related a work piece which part size is changing during the machining process is a trial and error process.




Furthermore, the mechanical contact work support tends to be bulky and may interfere with the position in which in process gauge fingers should otherwise be placed.




Also, when utilizing a mechanical follower rest, the installation of gauge fingers at the follower rest is very difficult.




Addition problems occur when machining ceramic materials utilizing a mechanical work support. The ceramic material is hard and very abrasive. When a material that is very hard is utilized at the contact points of the work support, the work support tends to burnish or wear the outer surface of the ceramic roll. When used for donor rolls, the electrical properties of the outer surface of the ceramic roll are adversely affected by a burnishing process, particularly if foreign material from the work rest is embedded into the roll. Furthermore, the burnishing may affect the size and the finish of the ceramic material.




When, alternatively, a soft material is utilized to support the ceramic roll, the support tends to wear excessively and loses its effectiveness by no longer totally supporting the roll. Furthermore, if a soft material is used for the work support, the outer surface of the work support becomes embedded into the ceramic material, further deteriorating the electrical properties of the ceramic roll.




Furthermore, the use of a mechanical steady rest makes adjustments for the proper fitting of the steady rest particularly during the machining process very difficult.




When utilizing a steady rest, the setup of the steady rest is very difficult in that not only the fit of the steady rest to the workpiece needs to be adjusted, but also the position of the mechanical steady rest needs to be adjusted. A series of steady rests may in fact be required to adequately support the part. Furthermore, the steady rest only serves to reduce chatter when the tool is positioned opposed to the support.




The following disclosures may be relevant to various aspects of the present invention:




U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,210




Patentee: Sharer




Issue Date: Jun. 186, 1996




U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,599




Patentee: Lessway




Issue Date: Feb. 15, 1994




U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,782




Patentee: Clough, et al.




Issue Date: May 23, 1989




U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,149




Patentee: Kelsey




Issue Date: Dec. 29, 1987




U.S. Pat. No. 4,712,332




Patentee: Smith




Issue Date: Dec. 15, 1987




U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,054




Patentee: Tsujiuchi et al.




Issue Date: Dec. 8, 1987




U.S. Pat No. 4,663,892




Patentee: Smith




Issue Date: May 12, 1987




U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,681




Patentee: Owsen




Issue Date: Oct. 15, 1985




U.S. Pat. No. 4,399,639




Patentee: Lessway




Issue Date: Aug. 23, 1983




U.S. Pat. No. 4,276,723




Patentee: Fournier




Issue Date: Jul. 7, 1981




The relevant portions of the foregoing disclosures may be briefly summarized as follows:




U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,210 discloses a dynamic steady rest particularly adapted for use in supporting a rotating workpiece during a grinding operation. The steady rest includes a lever assembly pivotally mounted on a base and having a workpiece support arm and a counterweight arm. Weights are adjustably secured to the counterweight arm and bias the support arm upwardly and into supporting engagement with the rotating workpiece. The steady rest further includes two dashpots pivotally secured between the base and the support arm to dampen the motion of the support arm.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,599 discloses a centering and supporting apparatus is disclosed for use as a true centering steady rest for rotatably supporting a cylindrical workpiece during a machining or grinding operation. The apparatus has an internal centerline adjustment mechanism for adjusting the steady rest so as to support the workpiece at its dynamic working centerline. At least one, or a pair of support arms are slidably mounted on an operator body in a housing. The one or pair of support arms each carries a side workpiece contact member, and the operator body carries a center workpiece contact member, and each workpiece contact member is engagable with the perimeter of the workpiece. The operator body is moved by a stroking means to urge the center workpiece to support a workpiece. The support arms are urged to support the workpiece by the action of cam followers carried by the support arms, and which cam followers are each engaged with a camming contour disposed in a guide plate that is displaceable within the housing by the internal centerline adjustment mechanism. The internal centerline adjustment mechanism allows either one or a pair of guide plates to be shifted within the steady rest to accommodate any deviation which the dynamic working centerline imposes from the static centerline originally established prior to a machining or grinding operation.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,782 discloses an improved grinding apparatus includes a base upon which a headstock is mounted. A carriage is movable along ways disposed on the base. A wheel slide on the carriage rotatably supports a grinding wheel. A first mounting plate extends beneath a first footstock and a first set of steady rests to a location adjacent to a headstock. While a workpiece is being ground, a second set of steady rests and a second footstock are mounted on a second mounting plate. When the grinding operation has been completed, the first mounting plate is disconnected from the base and removed from the grinding apparatus with the first set of steady rests and footstock. The second mounting plate with the second set of steady rests and footstock accurately positioned thereon are then inserted into the grinding apparatus.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,149 discloses a flow valve seat grinding apparatus incorporating an improved steady rest means. Includes a tubular drive shaft housing which houses and supports a rotatable and longitudinally movable drive shaft means. Drive shaft is connected through a flexible torque coupler to drive a valve seat grinding head. Grinding head is adapted to grind a valve seat located within a valve body. Includes adjustable anchor operable to laterally extend at least three anchor members into fixed anchoring contact with a sidewall of a valve body to laterally support the shaft housing in fixed position within the valve body.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,712,332 discloses a centerless grinding system comprises a driven grinding wheel, a driven regulating wheel, and a work rest blade for centerless grinding of a workpiece supported by the work rest blade between the grinding wheel and the regulating wheel; means for determining the rate of reduction of the workpiece radius while it is being ground; and means responsive to the rate of reduction of the workpiece radius for controlling the ratio of the power consumed in removing workpiece material to the rate of removal of workpiece material by the grinding wheel. The regulating wheel is preferably fed toward the grinding wheel to feed the workpiece into the grinding wheel. In a similar center-type grinding system, the workpiece is mounted on spindles or chucks which are movable toward the grinding wheel so that the workpiece can still be fed by the regulating wheel. Workpieces longer than the axial dimension of the grinding wheel are ground in successive plunges along the length of the workpiece, with the depth being controlled in each successive plunge. To grind hollow workpieces, the regulating wheel or grinding wheel is placed inside the hollow workpiece.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,054 discloses in a numerical control grinding machine using a grinding wheel made of cubic boron nitride, a computerized numerical controller controls the infeed movement of a wheel head to effect a rough grinding and a first fine grinding on a rotating cylindrical workpiece by the grinding wheel and to halt the first fine grinding in response to a sizing signal from a sizing device which measures the diameter of the workpiece being ground. At the halt of the first fine grinding, the numerical controller advances rest jaws to press the workpiece upon the grinding wheel until another sizing signal is issued from the sizing device. Until the number of the workpieces ground after each truing operation reaches a predetermined number, the numerical controller increase the infeed rate of the grinding wheel in each of the rough and first fine grindings toward a desired infeed rate on a step-by-step basis. Further, the numerical controller diminishes a set size which determines the time point to issue the first-mentioned sizing signal from the sizing device, toward a desired set size on a step-by-step basis with the increases in number of the workpiece ground after each truing.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,892 discloses a method of grinding a workpiece which is susceptible to deflection and/or deformation when grinding is carried out by relatively infeeding a grinding wheel to keep the wheel face and work surface in relative rubbing contact at an interface region, the method comprising continuously determining the force exerted by the wheel on the workpiece at the interface region as grinding conditions change, continuously applying to the workpiece at least one counterbalance force which in equivalent effect is opposite in sense to the determined force, and variably controlling the counterbalancing force to maintain its effective magnitude equal to the magnitude of the determined force.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,681 discloses a steady rest for alternatively supporting the internal and external surfaces of a tubular workpiece during a machining operation. Each outer end of a plurality of movable fingers includes first and second workpiece contact devices such as rollers. The second contact device is offset from the longitudinal axis of the finger so that it may engage the inner periphery of the workpiece. The opposite inner ends of the outer fingers ride in slots having opposing arcuate cam surfaces. One cam surface provides backup support for its finger when externally contacting the workpiece while the other cam surface insures stability when its finger is contacting the inner periphery of the workpiece.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,399,639 discloses a true centering steady rest for rotatably supporting an elongated cylindrical workpiece for a metal working operation on the outer diameter of the workpiece, such as a grinding operation. The steady rest includes a housing in which is slidably mounted a pusher arm carrying a workpiece center wear pad. A pair of side arms is slidably mounted on said pusher arm. Each side arm carries a replaceable wear pad engageable with a workpiece at a point in the range from 90°-140° from the center wear pad. The center and side wear pads are moved into operative engagement with a workpiece when the pusher arm is moved toward the workpiece, and they are disengaged from the workpiece when the pusher arm is moved away from the workpiece.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,276,723 discloses a steady rest for supporting a workpiece to be ground comprising three contact shoes which are simultaneously movable toward and away from a workpiece centerline so that workpieces of varying diameter can be supported and maintained on a fixed centerline of rotation. The top contact shoe is mounted for pivotal movement to a position clear of the work area to facilitate loading and unloading of the workpiece. A hydraulic operator is provided for pivoting the upper contact shoe between the operative position, engaging a workpiece, and the loadunload position. A second hydraulic operator is provided which through appropriate mechanical wedges moves upper contact shoe and the two lower non-pivoting contact shoes simultaneously toward or away from a workpiece.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, there is provided a support for supporting a work piece to be machined. The support is for use in a machine adapted to receive fluid from a fluid source. The machine includes a tool for removing material from the work piece. The support includes a body defining a chamber therein and an inlet operably associated with the body. The inlet is in communication with the chamber. The inlet is adapted for communication with the fluid source. The support also includes an outlet operably associated with the body and in communication with the chamber. The outlet is adapted to provide a stream of fluid for supporting the work piece.




According to the present invention there is further provided a method for machining the cylindrical periphery of cylindrical work pieces. The method includes the steps of providing a machine for removing material from a work piece, placing the work piece in operating position within the machine, placing a support in a spaced apart relationship to the work piece, providing a fluid source in fluid communication with a fluid flow device, advancing the fluid within the fluid source with the fluid flow device toward the support, advancing the tool toward the work piece, flowing fluid from the support onto the work piece, machining material from the work piece with the tool, and providing a fluid force from the fluid flowing onto the work piece to oppose a tool force from the tool so that the deflection of the work piece by the tool is reduced.




According to the present invention there is further provided a roll made by the process of providing a machine for removing material from a work piece, placing the work piece in operating position within the machine, placing a support in a spaced apart relationship to the work piece, providing a fluid source in fluid communication with a fluid flow device, advancing the fluid within the fluid source with the fluid flow device toward the support, advancing the tool toward the work piece, flowing fluid from the support onto the work piece, machining material from the work piece with the tool, and providing a fluid force from the fluid flowing onto the work piece to oppose a tool force from the tool so that the deflection of the work piece by the tool is reduced.




According to the present invention there is further provided a grinding machine for use in grinding a work piece. The grinding machine includes a frame and a grinding wheel rotatably mounted to the body. The grinding machine further includes a motor for rotating the grinding wheel and an apparatus operably associated with the body for rotatably supporting the work piece in a spaced apart relationship with respect to the apparatus.











IN THE DRAWINGS:





FIG. 1

is a perspective schematic partial view of a non-contact support installed on a grinding machine for cylindrical grinding according to the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a sectional view along the line


6





6


in the direction of the arrows of the support of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a plan view of the body of the

FIG. 1

support;





FIG. 4

is a plan view of a side plate for the support of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 5

is an end view of the

FIG. 6

side plate;





FIG. 6

is a plan view of a nozzle for the support of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 7

is an end view of the

FIG. 8

nozzle;





FIG. 8

is a schematic partial view of a prior art support installed on a grinding machine; and





FIG. 9

is a schematic elevational view of an illustrative electrophotographic printing machine incorporating a roll ground on a grinding machine utilizing the non-contact support of the present invention therein.











While the present invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.




Inasmuch as the art of electrophotographic printing is well known, the various processing stations employed in the

FIG. 9

printing machine will be shown hereinafter schematically and their operation described briefly with reference thereto.




Referring initially to

FIG. 9

, there is shown an illustrative electrophotographic printing machine incorporating a roll machined utilizing the non-contact support of the present invention of the present invention therein. The printing machine incorporates a photoreceptor


10


in the form of a belt having a photoconductive surface layer


12


on an electroconductive substrate


14


. Preferably, the surface


12


is made from a selenium alloy or a suitable photosensitive organic compound. The substrate


14


is preferably made from a polyester film such as Mylar® (a trademark of duPont (UK) Ltd.) which has been coated with a thin layer of aluminum alloy which is electrically grounded. The belt is driven by means of motor


24


along a path defined by rollers


18


,


20


and


22


, the direction of movement being counter-clockwise as viewed and as shown by arrow


16


. Initially a portion of the belt


10


passes through a charge station A at which a corona generator


26


charges surface


12


to a relatively high, substantially uniform, electrical potential. A high voltage power supply


28


is coupled to device


26


.




Next, the charged portion of photoconductive surface


12


is advanced through exposure station B. At exposure station B, the ROS


34


lays out the image in a series of horizontal scan lines with each line having a specified number of pixels per inch. The ROS includes a laser and a rotating polygon mirror block associated therewith. The ROS exposes the charged photoconductive surface of the printer.




After the electrostatic latent image has been recorded on photoconductive surface


12


, the motion of the belt


10


advances the latent image to development station C as shown in FIG.


4


. At development station C, a development system


38


, develops the latent image recorded on the photoconductive surface. The chamber in developer housing


44


stores a supply of developer material


47


. The developer material


47


may be, as shown in

FIG. 4

, a two component developer material of at least magnetic carrier granules


48


having toner particles


50


adhering triboelectrically thereto. It should be appreciated that the developer material may likewise comprise a one component developer material consisting primarily of toner particles. Preferably the development system is a hybrid scavangeless development system. In a scavengeless development system, toner is detached from a donor roll by applying AC electric field to self-spaced electrode structures (not shown), commonly in the form of wires positioned in the nip between the donor roll


80


and the photoreceptor belt


10


in the case of hybrid scavengeless development or by applying the AC electrical field directly to the donor roll


80


in the case of hybrid jumping development. This forms a toner powder cloud in the nip and the latent image attracts toner particles


50


from the powder cloud thereto.




Again referring to

FIG. 9

, after the electrostatic latent image has been developed, the motion of the belt


10


advances the developed image to transfer station D, at which. a copy sheet


54


is advanced by roll


52


and guides


56


into contact with the developed image. on belt


10


. A corona generator


58


is used to spray ions on to the back of the sheet so as to attract the toner image from belt


10


to the sheet. As the belt turns around roller


18


, the sheet is stripped therefrom with the toner image thereon.




After transfer, the sheet is advanced by a conveyor (not shown) to fusing station E. Fusing station E includes a heated fuser roller


64


and a back-up roller


66


. The sheet passes between fuser roller


64


and back-up roller


66


with the toner powder image contacting fuser roller


64


. In this way, the toner powder image is permanently affixed to the sheet. After fusing, the sheet advances through chute


70


to catch tray


72


for subsequent removal from the printing machine by the operator.




After the sheet is separated from photoconductive surface


12


of belt


10


, the residual developer material adhering to photoconductive surface


12


is removed therefrom at cleaning station F by a rotatably mounted fibrous brush


74


in contact with photoconductive surface


12


. Subsequent to cleaning, a discharge lamp (not shown) floods photoconductive surface


12


with light to dissipate any residual electrostatic charge remaining thereon prior to the charging thereof for the next successive imaging cycle.




It is believed that the foregoing description is sufficient for purposes of the present application to illustrate the general operation of an electrophotographic printing machine incorporating the development apparatus of the present invention therein.




According to present invention and referring again to FIG.


9


. the donor roll


80


which is ground on a grinding machine utilizing the non-contact support of the present invention is shown. The donor roll


80


is electrically biased to separate toner particles


50


from the carrier granules


48


of the developer material within the developer housing


44


. The donor roll


80


is electrically biased and in cooperation with the developmental electrodes (not shown) serves to form a powder cloud in nip


82


between the donor roll


80


and the surface


12


of the photoconductive valve


10


. The donor roll


80


is made to exacting tolerances and may be made of a material difficult to machine, for example, a ceramic material. It should be appreciated that while the donor roll


80


is a exemplary workpiece to be machined utilizing the noncontact support of the present invention, any workpiece which deflects during the machining process may benefit from the use of the present invention herein.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, support


100


according to the present invention, is shown installed in machine


102


. The machine


102


may be any machine tool capable of removing material from a cylindrical workpiece. Typically the machine


102


is in the form of a lathe, for example, a CNC lathe, or in the form of a grinding machine. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the machine


102


is a grinding machine. When the machine


102


is a grinding machine, it may be either a center-type or a centerless grinder. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the machine


102


is a center-type grinder.




The support


100


is utilized to support a workpiece, for example, roll


80


.




The roll


80


is supported in the grinding machine


102


by a headstock


104


and a tailstock


106


. Centers


108


extend outwardly from the headstock


104


and the tailstock


106


and engage with chamfers


110


located on first end


112


and second end


114


of the workpiece


80


. A headstock motor


116


is used to rotate the headstock


104


, which in turn rotates the workpiece


80


in the direction of arrow


118


.




The machine


102


includes a tool


120


for removing material from the roll


80


. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the tool


120


is in the form of a grinding wheel. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the grinding wheel


120


has a generally cylindrical shape and includes an outer periphery


122


, which contacts outer periphery


124


of the roll


80


. It should be appreciated, however, that the tool


120


may be any tool capable of removing material from a workpiece. For example, the tool


120


may be in the form of a high speed steel or carbide cutting tool.




The grinding wheel


120


is preferably mounted to a wheelhead


126


by an arbor


128


secured to the wheel


120


. The arbor


128


rotates about bearings


130


located in the wheelhead


126


. The arbor


128


is rotated by a wheelhead motor


132


connected to the wheelhead


126


. The wheelhead


126


is adapted to move in the direction of arrow


134


thereby advancing the grinding wheel


120


into contact with periphery


124


of the roll


80


.




While the tool


120


may have a wheel width WW that is similar to the length L of the roll


80


, preferably, the tool


120


has a width WW which is significantly less than the length L of the roll


80


. Since the width of the wheel


120


is less than the length of the workpiece


80


, the wheelhead


126


preferably moves in the direction of arrows


136


and


138


.




According to the present invention, the support


100


is adapted for use in the machine


102


and is adapted to received fluid


140


from a fluid source


142


. The support


100


may have any suitable shape and configuration capable of transmitting the fluid


120


toward the periphery


124


of the roll


182


support the roll


80


. The support


100


includes a body


144


that defines a chamber


146


within the body


144


. The support


100


further includes an inlet


148


that is operably associated with the body


144


. The inlet


148


is in communication with the chamber


146


. The inlet


148


is adapted for communication with the fluid source


142


. The support


100


also includes an outlet


150


. The outlet


150


is operably associated with the body


144


and is in communication with the chamber


146


. The outlet


150


is adapted to provide a stream


152


of fluid


140


for supporting the workpiece or roll


80


. Stream


152


of fluid


140


from the outlet


150


provides a force in the direction of arrow


154


in a direction opposed to a force in the direction of arrow


134


caused by the grinding of the roll


80


by the tool


120


.




While the invention may be practiced with a support


100


including only a solitary outlet providing a stream in the direction of arrow


154


, preferably, the support


100


includes additional outlets to assist in stabilizing the roll


80


and to provide additional coolant to the grinding of the roll by the grinding wheel


120


. For example, as shown in

FIG. 1

, the support


100


may further include, in addition to first outlet


150


, a second outlet


156


positioned vertically above the roll


80


, as well as a third outlet


158


positioned vertically below the roll


80


.




While it should be appreciated that the first outlet


150


, the second outlet


156


, and the third outlet


158


may all be interconnected by, for example, the chamber


146


to inlet


148


, preferably, each of the first outlet


150


, the second outlet


156


, and the third outlet


158


are each associated with a separate inlet. For example, the first outlet


150


is operably connected to first inlet


148


. Second outlet


156


is similarly operably connected to second inlet


160


and third outlet


158


is operably connected to third inlet


162


.




The fluid


140


utilized in the support


100


of the present invention, may be any fluid either in the form of a liquid or a gas that provides a noncontact support to the workpiece


80


. For example, the fluid


140


may be a liquid, for example water or oil, or may be in the form of a gas, for example a compressed gas or compressed air. For simplicity, the fluid


140


may be in the form of a coolant utilized to cool the grinding wheel


120


. For example, the fluid


140


may be a cutting oil or a water based grinding wheel coolant. Typically, the fluid


140


is in the form of a water based grinding wheel coolant.




The fluid


140


may be delivered to the support


140


through a series of conduits


164


. The conduits


164


may include a main conduit


166


that is connected to the fluid source


142


. The main conduit


164


is, as shown in

FIG. 1

, also connected to first conduit


168


, second conduit


170


and third conduit


172


.




The fluid source


142


may be any suitable fluid source capable of providing a fluid flow to the support


100


. Typically the fluid source


142


is in the form of a fluid pump, for example a coolant pump. For simplicity, the coolant pump


142


may be the coolant pump that is utilized with the machine


102


for cooling the tool


120


and the workpiece


80


.




The coolant pump


142


may be of any configuration capable of providing sufficient fluid flow for the operation of the support


100


according to the present invention. Applicants have found that a coolant pump capable of delivering


60


gallons per minute of coolant flow is sufficient for providing support for the donor roll


80


as show in FIG.


9


.




Preferably, to balance the force of the flow from the fluid source through the support


100


with the grinding wheel force from the grinding wheel


120


upon the roll.


80


, preferably, the flow of fluid from the fluid source


142


is preferably controlled by a valve


174


in fluid communication with the inlet


148


for controlling the flow of fluid through the outlet


150


. While a solitary first valve


174


may be sufficient to control the flow of fluid from the fluid source


142


to the support


100


, preferably, as shown in

FIG. 1

, when utilizing a plurality of conduits and associated outlets, the support


100


utilizes, in addition to first valve


174


, a second valve


176


positioned in second conduit


170


and a third valve


178


positioned in third conduit


172


. By providing the first valve


174


, the second valve


176


and the third valve


178


, the flow from the first outlet


150


as well as the second outlet


156


and the third outlet


158


can be independently adjusted to provide for optimum support of the roll


80


.




The body


144


of the support


100


is mounted to the machine


102


by any suitable method. The body


144


may be mounted to frame


180


of the machine


102


to which the headstock


104


and tailstock


106


are mounted or, preferably, as shown in

FIG. 1

, the body


144


of the support


100


is fixedly mounted to wheelhead


126


by support bracket


182


.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, since the body


144


of the support


100


is fixed to the wheelhead


126


, the support


100


moves with the grinding wheel


120


in the directions of arrows


136


and


138


. Thus the support


100


provides support for the roll


80


at a position opposed to the grinding wheel


120


throughout the grinding process.




Alternatively, to further balance the support provided by the fluid source


142


with the grinding force from the grinding wheel


120


, the support


100


may further include a feedback system


184


. The feedback system


184


is utilized to provide a closed loop control of the fluid flow provided by the fluid source


142


. The feedback system


184


includes a sensor


186


operably associated with the machine


102


which, for example, measures the force applied by the grinding wheel


120


onto the roll


80


as, for example, felt at the tailstock


106


. The feedback system


184


further includes a feedback system controller


190


, which is operably associated with the support


100


. The feedback system controller


190


receives a signal


192


through conduit


188


from the sensor


186


, which is indicative of the force supplied by the grinding wheel


120


onto the roll


80


. The controller


190


sends a signal


194


through conduit


196


to the first valve


174


indicative of the flow of fluid through the first outlet


150


necessary to counteract the force applied by the grinding wheel


120


onto the roll


80


.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, the support


100


is shown in greater detail. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the body


144


includes three apertures


200


in the body


144


as well as opening


202


that form the chamber


146


.




While the inlets and outlets associated with the body


144


may have any suitable form, preferably as shown in

FIG. 2

, the inlets


148


,


160


, and


162


are integral with the body


144


and are defined by the apertures


200


. The conduits


168


,


170


, and


172


may be secured to the body


144


in any suitable fashion, for example by pipe threads (not shown).




The outlets


150


,


156


and


158


may have any suitable form and may, for example, be integral with the body


144


or as shown in

FIG. 2

, be in the form of nozzles. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the nozzles


150


,


156


and


158


are preferably slidably fitted to the body


144


in a direction parallel with the longitudinal axis


204


of the roll


80


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the nozzles


150


,


156


and


158


are secured to the body


144


by gibs


206


located on the outer periphery of the nozzles


150


,


156


and


158


, respectively.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, the body


144


of the support


100


includes the centrally located inlets


148


,


160


and


162


. Apertures


200


within the body


144


define the inlets


148


,


160


and


162


.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, the body


144


, preferably closely conforms with the roll


80


so as to assure that sufficient fluid remains in communication with the roll during the machining of the roll. The opening


202


formed in the body


144


thus preferably is defined by a body diameter BD which is concentric with axis


204


of the roll


80


. For example, for a roll having a roll diameter RD of, for example 1.2 inches, the body diameter BD is, for example 1.4 inches. By utilizing nozzles


150


,.


156


and


158


that are slidably insertable into the body


144


, replaceable nozzles may be utilized for different diameter rolls. It should be appreciated that the body diameter BD becomes increasingly larger than the roll diameter RD, roll diameters of smaller and larger size than the roll


80


may be accommodated by merely changing the thickness T of the outlets


150


,


156


and


158


.




To provide optimum force for a minimum flow of fluid through the support


100


, preferably, the nozzles


150


,


156


and


158


are positioned closely to the roll


80


. For example, the nozzles


150


,


156


and


158


form a nozzle diameter ND that is only slightly larger than the roll diameter RD. For example, for a roll diameter RD of 1.2 inches the nozzle diameter ND is approximately 1.3 inches.




Referring now to

FIGS. 6 and 7

, nozzle


148


is shown in greater detail. While nozzles


148


,


156


and


158


may each be different from the other, preferably, for simplicity, the nozzles


156


and


158


are preferably identical to nozzle


148


. (See FIG.


2


). While the invention may be practiced utilizing a support


100


with nozzles having a solitary aperture associated with each nozzle, preferably, the nozzle


148


includes a plurality of nozzle apertures


206


.




By utilizing a plurality of apertures


206


, the nozzle


148


may for a given flow rate be positioned more closely to the roll


80


thereby increasing the force that the fluid applies to the roll


80


. Further, by reducing the size of the apertures


206


, the velocity of the fluid through the nozzle


148


may be increased thereby increasing the force of the nozzle


148


.




While the invention may be practiced with any number of apertures


206


, applicants have found that a quantity of nine apertures per nozzle is sufficient for the operation. To support a ceramic roll


80


during the grinding thereof, applicants have found that apertures


206


with a diameter AD of, for example 3.175 millimeters spaced approximately a distance NS of approximately 5 millimeters, to be sufficient to support the roll


80


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 4 and 5

, an endplate


210


is shown for restraining the sliding motion of the nozzles


148


,


156


and


158


. While it should be appreciated that the nozzles


148


,


156


and


158


may be secured to the body


144


in any suitable fashion, for example, by gluing or interference fitting, for simplicity and for ease of changing the nozzles an endplate


210


is positioned on each of the two faces


212


of the body


144


(see FIG.


3


).




The force provided by a flow of fluid against the roll may be described utilizing Newton's Second Law as described in the following equation:








F=p×Q×ΔV








where:




P=density of water




Q=volume flow rate, and




ΔV=the change in velocity of the fluid as it strikes the roll.




Q may be further defined by the following formula:








Q=a×V








where:




a=cross sectional area of the nozzle aperture




V=the velocity of the fluid




a may be further defined by the following formula:








a=ΠD




2


/4






Where:




D=diameter of the nozzle




By utilizing the above equations, it can readily be seen that the force required to overcome the grinding force may be accomplished by utilizing a fluid with a sufficient flow rate.




By providing a fluid supporting non-contact work support burnishing marks on the workpiece are eliminated.




By providing a non-contact fluid steady rest, the possibility of embedding material into the workpiece during support is eliminated.




By providing a non-contact work support that moves with the grinding wheel, the work support force is applied only where needed.




By providing a non-contact fluid work support, setup time for the changeovers for one workpiece to a different workpiece is reduced.




By providing a non-contact work support that closely conforms with the grinding wheel, improved cooling of the grinding wheel is accomplished.




By providing for a non-contact work support, room is available at the tool for use of an in-process gauge.




By providing a non-contact fluid work support, the workpiece is better supported providing for deeper cuts and faster feeds which results in reduced machining times.




By providing for a fluid work support with removable nozzles, a variety of workpieces can be supported with a common non-contact work support.




By providing a non-contact work support with a feedback control system for optimizing the fluid flow upon the workpiece, deflection and chatter from the machining process may be reduced.




While this invention has been described in conjunction with various embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for machining the cylindrical periphery of cylindrical work pieces, comprising the steps of:providing a machine for removing material from a work piece; placing the work piece in operating position within the machine; placing a support in a spaced apart relationship to the work piece; providing a fluid source in fluid communication with a fluid flow device; advancing the fluid within the fluid source with the fluid flow device toward the support; advancing a tool toward the workpiece; flowing fluid from the support onto the workpiece; machining material from the workpiece with the tool; providing a fluid force from the fluid flowing onto the work piece to oppose a tool force from the tool so that the deflection of the work piece by the tool is reduced wherein the fluid force is adjustable to counteract the force applied to the workpiece by the tool.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of controlling the flow of fluid through an outlet with a valve.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of:measuring the force applied by the tool onto the work piece with a sensor; and controlling the flow of fluid through the outlet by receiving a signal from the sensor indicative of the force applied by the tool onto the work piece and by sending a signal to the valve indicative of the flow of fluid through the outlet necessary to counteract the force applied by the tool onto the work piece.
Parent Case Info

Cross-reference is made to the following divisional application filed concurrently herewith: U.S. application Ser. No. 09/146,207, filed Sep. 2, 1998, entitled “Grinding Wheel With Geometrical Pattern”, by Timothy R. Jaskowiak et al.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
4276723 Fournier Jul 1981 A
4399639 Lessway Aug 1983 A
4546681 Owsen Oct 1985 A
4663892 Smith May 1987 A
4709509 Yoneda et al. Dec 1987 A
4711054 Tsujiuchi et al. Dec 1987 A
4712332 Smith Dec 1987 A
4715149 Kelsey Dec 1987 A
4831782 Clough et al. May 1989 A
5070655 Aggarwal Dec 1991 A
5076022 Ohta et al. Dec 1991 A
5285599 Lessway Feb 1994 A
5441438 Bishop Aug 1995 A
5527210 Sharer Jun 1996 A
5547414 Ohmori Aug 1996 A