Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years well architecture has become more sophisticated where appropriate in order to help enhance access to underground hydrocarbon reserves. For example, as opposed to wells of limited depth, it is not uncommon to find hydrocarbon wells exceeding 30,000 feet in depth. Furthermore, as opposed to remaining entirely vertical, today's hydrocarbon wells often include deviated or horizontal sections aimed at targeting particular underground reserves.
While such well depths and architecture may increase the likelihood of accessing underground hydrocarbon reservoirs, other challenges are presented in terms of well management and the maximization of hydrocarbon recovery from such wells. For example, during the life of a well, a variety of well access applications may be performed within the well with a host of different tools or measurement devices. However, providing downhole access to wells of such challenging architecture may require more than simply dropping a wireline into the well with the applicable tool located at the end thereof. Indeed, a variety of isolating, perforating and stimulating applications may be employed in conjunction with completions operations.
In the case of perforating, different zones of the well may be outfitted with packers and other hardware, in part for sake of zonal isolation. Thus, wireline or other conveyance may be directed to a given zone and a perforating gun employed to create perforation tunnels through the well casing. As a result, perforations may be formed into the surrounding formation, ultimately enhancing recovery therefrom.
The described manner of perforating requires first that the perforating gun be loaded with a number of explosive components, generally referred to as “shaped charges”. Shaped charge components usually include an explosive material mixture that is housed within a casing with a liner provided there-over. The explosive mixture is often a dry compressed material mixture that is configured to be detonated on-demand. Once the gun is individually loaded with a host of charges and delivered downhole to a targeted location in the well, the charges may be remotely detonated from the oilfield surface by an operator. Upon detonation, each shaped charge may perform similar to a ballistic jet in forming an adjacent perforation. Further, this manner of operation is enhanced by the liner over the explosive which may serve to tailor the performance of the shaped charge in terms of the resulting adjacent perforation.
A method of perforating a well is described wherein a shaped charge in a non-detonable state is loaded into a perforating gun. The gun is then advanced to a target location in the well where the shaped charge is now activated to a detonable state. The well may then be perforated at the target location with the charge. In one embodiment, the activating of the shaped charge to a detonable state is achieved through heat activating materials of the shaped charge to a fluid condition.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described may be practiced without these particular details. Further, numerous variations or modifications may be employed which remain contemplated by the embodiments as specifically described.
Embodiments are described with reference to certain downhole perforating applications in vertical cased well environments. In particular, wireline deployed applications utilizing a perforating gun in the form of a pivot gun accommodating initially non-detonable shaped charges are detailed. However, other forms of deployment, gun types and well architectures may take advantage of non-detonable shaped charges as detailed herein. For example, horizontal or multi-zonal wells may benefit from shaped charges. Additionally, the perforating gun need not necessarily be a pivot gun. Regardless, so long as non-detonable shaped charges are employed that may be activated to a detonable state upon operator activation, appreciable benefit may be realized.
While fairly safe and effective for use downhole in the well, providing the end user at the oilfield with a multitude of shaped charges requires shipping of the explosives to the oilfield site. Thus, the challenge of safely shipping explosives is presented. Naturally, along these lines, the generally more burdensome task of obtaining governmental approval for the shipping of the explosives is also presented. As a result, when it comes to supplying shaped charges to an operator at an oilfield, a host of shipping and handling related costs are incurred in order to ensure governmental approval for the shipping in addition to safety.
By way of example, the US Department of Transportation (DOT) may require a host of tests be applied to an intended shipment of shaped charges before the shipment is certified for transport. This may include burn, drop tests and others. For example, drop testing of shaped charges may be dropped from set heights and examined for potential discharge.
For some jurisdictions, the testing standards are such that the possibility of attaining certification for international transport is virtually non-existent. However, where the possibility of attaining certification is present, a variety of costly and time consuming efforts are generally undertaken in order to deal with the hazards to attain certification. These efforts may include the use of specialized packaging and other costly measures. Once more, a significant amount of added delay is presented in the form of ensuring regulatory compliance and certification. Indeed, depending on the jurisdiction overseeing the certification process, delays of up to 6 to 9 months are not uncommon. As a practical matter this often means that the shaped charge supplier is likely to lose out to a more local, potentially pre-certified, competitor that does not need to ship the explosive shaped charges as far.
Efforts have been undertaken that would prevent the shipping of the completed shaped charge explosive. For example, the explosive components may be shipped separately in an effort to minimize applicable transport regulations. However, an unreasonable burden is placed on field personnel if significant skill and preparation time is necessary in order to produce a shaped charge on site. Thus, as a practical matter, the operator is often more likely to simply select the more user-friendly route of acquiring more fully assembled shaped charges from a supplier that has already acquired the necessary shipping approval therefor.
A method of perforating a well is described wherein a shaped charge in a non-detonable state is loaded into a perforating gun. The gun is then advanced to a target location in the well where the shaped charge is now activated to a detonable state. The well may then be perforated at the target location with the charge. In one embodiment, the activating of the shaped charge to a detonable state is achieved through heat activating materials of the shaped charge to a fluid condition.
Referring now to
The change in state from a non-detonable state to a detonable shaped charge 100′ may be the result of an activation such as the directed application of heat or other applied factors. Indeed, in the embodiment shown, the carriers 110 of the pivot gun 125 are secured to a housing 175 of the gun 125 by way of hinges 160. Thus, in addition to the application of heat, a swinging open of the carriers 110 from a retracted position at the housing 175 to the depicted lateral position may also serve as a factor to enhance activating the charges 100′ to the detonable state shown. For example, where heat and such a targeted movement are used to liquefy and mix shaped charge materials to attain a detonable state, such an embodiment may prove effective for activation. That is, as detailed below, a given non-detonable shaped charge 100 may include mixed or unmixed solid materials, such as compressed powders, that require heating and/or mixing for attaining a detonable state (see
Continuing with reference to
Additional forms of activation such as circulating a heated fluid to the perforating gun 125, initiating a chemical reaction at the charges 100′, introducing a predetermined pressure and others may be available. Indeed, the particular activation may be a matter of a variety of factors such as the type of conveyance utilized. For example, in an embodiment where coiled tubing is utilized for the conveyance in place of wireline 150, a targeted circulation of steam through the coiled tubing to the gun 125 may be suitable.
Referring now to
Continuing with reference to the schematic of
Referring now to
With specific reference to
Continuing with reference to
Referring now to
With the general concept of a shaped charge moving from a non-detonable state 100 to a detonable state 100′, specific reference is now drawn to
With specific reference now to
Continuing with reference to
The shaped charge 100 of
As noted above, the mixture 650 of
Heating of the mixture 650 in order to achieve activation is advantageous where the activating temperature exceeds temperatures likely to be encountered during standard handling and transport situations. That is, the shaped charge 100 remains safely stable and inert until loaded and intentionally heated as discussed above. As a practical matter, the charge 100 will not encounter temperatures in excess of 150° F. during standard transport. Heating may also provide the added advantage of melting, agitating and further mixing the mixture 650. That is, similar to the pivoting action of a carrier 110 as noted above with respect to
With specific reference to
In other embodiments, the materials of the layers 752, 755 may be provided separately to the operator for assembly. For example, the operator may attain shipments of casings 675 with fuel layers 752 thereon while also attaining shipments of separate liners 625 with oxidizer layers 755 thereon. In such an embodiment, the operator may snap-fit or otherwise assemble the liners 625 into the casings 675 before putting the assembled shaped charge 100 into the gun 125 (e.g. of
Additionally, the separate component layers 752, 755 need not be stacked in the fashion shown with one 752 secured to the casing 675 and the other secured to the liner 625. For example, the component layers 752, 755 may be provided side by side with one type of material at the left of the charge 100 as shown and the other separated to the right of the charge 100 as shown. Furthermore, regardless of orientation, to increase security and surface area for interaction, the interface between the layers 752, 755 may be of a jagged or uneven nature, whereby matching surfaces of the layers 752, 755 are mated together. Regardless, in the embodiment shown, once mixed, heat may be applied for activation so as to render a detonable shaped charge 100′ (see
Referring now to
The deployment of the wireline 150 and perforating gun 125 may be directed through a control unit 830 provided by the depicted truck 875. Similarly, the control unit 830 may be used to direct activating the charges 100′ to a detonable state. This may be achieved through heating or other means as described above as directed by the control unit 830. Further, once activated, the unit 830 may also direct initiation and firing of the gun 125 to form the perforations 500 through the casing 385 and into the formation 390. However, as described above, until the operator is ready, there is no particular need to have the charges 100′ in such a state. Instead, prior to deployment, the charges 100′ may remain in a safe non-detonable condition.
Referring now to
Embodiments described herein above include the use of shaped charges that are non-explosive for sake of transport. These non-detonable shaped charges are constructed to readily withstand the scrutiny of certification for shipping. Thus, time consuming delays and costly efforts to attain shipping approval in various jurisdictions may be substantially eliminated as well as the potential associated shipping hazards. Once more, after shipping, the shaped charges may be activated to a detonable state at the appropriate operator-determined time for sake of perforating a well. Thus, the shaped charges are both well suited for transport in a non-detonable state and well suited for a perforating application in a detonable state once the appropriate detonating time arises.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2363234 | Henri-Georges | Nov 1944 | A |
3094069 | Hradel | Jun 1963 | A |
4248303 | Charpentier | Feb 1981 | A |
4274893 | Mars et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4884506 | Guerreri | Dec 1989 | A |
5159146 | Carisella | Oct 1992 | A |
5392860 | Ross | Feb 1995 | A |
5750057 | Brown | May 1998 | A |
6336408 | Parrott | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20030037692 | Liu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050087344 | Toekje | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070240880 | Olsen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090183916 | Pratt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20130118805 | Moody-Stuart | May 2013 | A1 |
20160230524 | Dumoit | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Mumma, D.M., et al. “Geofrac—An explosives stimulation technique for a geothermal well” LA-UR-82-2020, Geothermal Resource Council Mtg, San Diego, CA, Oct. 11-14, 1982, 5 pgs. |
Hanold, R.J. “Explosive stimulation of a geothermal well at the Geysers” LA-UR-80-1713, Conference: Symposium on geothermal well stimulation, San Francisco, CA, Feb. 7, 1980, 10 pgs. |
Meyer, Rudolf, et al “Explosives”; p. 348. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180087353 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |