A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
All patents and publications described or disclosed herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates generally to a system relating to the suspension system for a motorized vehicle. More specifically, the invention relates to a system that raises the frame of a motorized vehicle farther from the ground to provide greater ground clearance without requiring that the existing or original equipment suspension system be damaged or cut. More specifically the present invention relates to a non-drop torsion control bracket that can be attached to a motorized vehicle to allow more ground clearance while allowing the stock torsion bars to be placed at the same angle and/or not moved from their stock position.
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that motor vehicles have a suspension system having various devices to allow vertical movement of the wheel with respect to the frame. In modern vehicles this system may include a shock absorber, a torsion bar, and a bump stop contacting with or attached to a control arm. The control arm attaches to a ball joint that attaches to the wheel assembly. The control arm is pivotally connected to the frame of a vehicle such as by a pivot point attached to the frame. The control arm pivots about the pivot point as the wheel moves upwardly and downwardly with respect to the frame so that the wheel can move vertical somewhat independently of the frame of the vehicle. If the control arm did not allow the wheel to move somewhat independently, the vehicle's ride would be very rough indeed. Therefore, to make the vertical movements of the wheel less pronounced upon the vehicle and its passengers, the shock absorber provides somewhat vertical shock absorption dampening vertical movement, the torsion bar provides some torsional absorption but also prevents the control arm from moving laterally, and the bump stop provides some additional absorption.
Stock vehicles are provided with a set ground clearance. For example on General Motors Heavy Duty trucks and sport utility vehicles, the standard clearance is 13 to 15 inches. However, some owners wish to increase this clearance to 15 to 26 inches so that the vehicle may be driven over less consistent terrain and larger wheels and tires can be used. In this instance, a suspension lift kit can be added to the vehicle to achieve greater clearance.
The most common lift kits today either require that the frame be cut or that frame rivets that attach the torsion bar to the frame be cut away. As a result, present lift kits not only damage the stock equipment but also prevent the vehicle from being returned to stock or original condition. Over time, consumers often wish the vehicle to be returned to stock so that the vehicle may be sold in its original condition or used as something other than an off the road vehicle. The fact that exiting lift kits do not allow this certainly affects the future value of the altered vehicles.
There are many examples of lift kits that have been used in the past and are presently being used. Some examples of control arms and lift kits are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. D475,001; 2,734,753; 5,310,210; 6,305,699; 6,702,308; 6,767,021; and 6,860,499 as well as Published Application 2004/0075234 A1. However, these systems will not work to raise the frame on modern vehicles such as General Motors Heavy Duty trucks and sport utility vehicles in such a way as to allow the vehicle to be returned to its original equipment later. These patents are incorporated by reference.
What is needed is a lift kit that does not irreversibly damage or alter the vehicle's stock equipment. This needed lift kit must be usable in connection with a lift kit that does cut or otherwise damage the stock frame such as the differential. This needed lift kit must be easy to install. This needed system must raise the frame without altering the alignment of the torsion bar and bump stop. This needed system must avoid the relocation of the torsion bar. This needed system must maintain the range of motion allowed by the stock-located torsion bar. This needed system must maintain the stock distance between the torsion bar and the stock control arm in the placement of the torsion bar in contact with the new control arm. This needed system is presently lacking in the art.
The present invention discloses a vehicle lift kit that allows a vehicle to be lifted or raised from the ground without moving the stock torsion bar bracket. The present lift kit has a drop bracket having a front pivot point, a rear pivot point, and a torsion bar socket for receiving a torsion bar of the vehicle. The lift kit also provides a link attached to the front pivot point of the drop bracket and a stock control arm and a bracket attachable to the rear pivot point of the drop bracket and the stock control arm. The lift kit may also provide a rear suspension cross member that attaches to the stock frame to secure the stock control arm and the drop bar to the frame. The drop bracket may have a bump stop pad. The link attaches to a shock mount of the stock control arm. The bracket is attached to a pivot point of the stock control arm. The link has a body joining an upper hole and a lower hole.
The torsion bar and the torsion bar adjuster bracket are not relocated. The torsion bar in reference to the stock pivot point and range of motion remains the same as stock.
It is therefore a general object of the present invention to provide a lift kit that does not irreversibly damage or alter the vehicle's stock equipment but can be used in connection with a lift kit that does cut or otherwise alter the stock equipment.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system that is easy to install.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a system that can raise the frame without altering the alignment of the torsion bar and bump stop.
A yet further object of the present invention is to avoid the relocation of the torsion bar.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system that can maintain the range of motion allowed by the stock-located torsion bar.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a system that maintains the stock distance between the torsion bar and the stock control arm in the placement of the torsion bar in contact with the new control arm.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following disclosure when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As shown in
As shown in
The after market shock absorber 13 is preferably any gas charged, hydraulic or Monotube type shock absorber such as Gabriel.
Thus, although there have been described particular embodiments of the present invention of a new and useful Non-Drop Torsion Bar Bracket and Assembly, it is not intended that such references be construed as limitations upon the scope of this invention except as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2734753 | Lind | Feb 1956 | A |
3604724 | Corbin | Sep 1971 | A |
3773349 | Boyd | Nov 1973 | A |
4203615 | Cislo et al. | May 1980 | A |
4234205 | Thiesce | Nov 1980 | A |
4344642 | Goth | Aug 1982 | A |
4501436 | Ishida | Feb 1985 | A |
4526400 | Kijima et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4529222 | Kijima et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4623164 | Cassel et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4629226 | Cassel et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4660862 | Cassel et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4813720 | Cassel | Mar 1989 | A |
4825970 | McVicar et al. | May 1989 | A |
4906018 | Kijima et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4943081 | Golpe | Jul 1990 | A |
5181736 | Kokubun | Jan 1993 | A |
5240279 | Kunert | Aug 1993 | A |
5310210 | Delbeke et al. | May 1994 | A |
5560651 | Kami et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5707073 | Stuker et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5794965 | Stuker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6070892 | Noutomi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6305699 | Konig | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D475001 | Roll | May 2003 | S |
6679517 | Proia | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702308 | Yamaguchi | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6767021 | Schnurpel | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6860499 | Gerrard | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6921097 | Ohlsson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20060049600 | Dudding et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071441 | Mathis | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060273540 | Heron et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070246904 | Murata et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |