This invention relates to a non-interfering multipath communication system.
Monitoring and control systems such as used to supervise processing plants and manufacturing processes and machines have become a critical part of operations. A report of an unsafe or hazardous condition can shut down an entire facility operation resulting in huge costs and delays. Wired systems often use redundant conductor paths from the field station sensor/actuators to the base station to avoid incorrect signals or total loss of signals due to accident or failure. Wireless systems have become much more appealing due to their lower installation cost and ease of installation and redeployment. One problem with wireless and even wired systems is that if anything interferes with the delivery of the signal from the sensor/actuator transducer at a field station faulty reports or even worse no reports can precipitate a variety of unnecessary effort before the true situation can be determined. Redundancy is always a solution but often it adds to the complexity and power required as well as to the cost.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide improved non-interfering multipath communication system.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved non-interfering multipath communication system which is simpler and more power efficient.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved non-interfering multipath communication system which is more reliable, faster and more robust.
If it is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved non-interfering multipath communication system which continues communications between a field station and base station even when some paths are blocked.
If it is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved non-interfering multipath communication system which provides redundancy at little cost compared to wired systems.
If it is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved non-interfering multipath communication system which simplifies the identification of the point of failure.
The invention results from the realization that a truly effective non-interfering multipath communication system can be achieved by establishing base transmit and receive periods for a plurality of spaced apart transceiver devices of a base station, communicating between at least one field station and the base station through the transceiver devices and allocating at least a transmit period of the base station amongst the transceiver devices to maintain non-interfering multipath communication between the at least one field station and the base station even when some paths are blocked.
This invention features a non-interfering multipath communication system including a base station having base transmit and receive periods and including a plurality of spaced apart transceiver devices. There is at least one field station for communicating with the base station through the transceiver devices during the periods. The base station includes a controller device for allocating the periods amongst the transceiver devices to maintain non-interfering multipath communication between the at least one field station and the base station.
In a preferred embodiment the base station may include a base clock circuit for defining the base transmit and receive periods, and the field station may include a field clock circuit for defining field transmit and receive periods and at least one of the clock circuits may generate a sync clock pulse to synchronize the clock circuits with each other. The field station and the transceiver devices may communicate by conductors or via electromagnetic radiation, such as rf. The field stations may include at least one of a sensor transducer and an actuator transducer. The controller device may include means for allocating the periods to the transceiver devices randomly or in a predetermined order.
The invention also features a non-interfering multipath communication method including establishing base transmit and receive periods for a plurality of spaced apart transceiver devices of a base station and communicating between at least one field station and the base station through the transceiver devices. A period of the base station is allocated amongst the transceiver devices to maintain non-interfering multipath communication between the at least one field station and the base station.
In a preferred embodiment there are established field transmit and receive periods for the field station and a sync pulse is generated to synchronize the clock circuits with each other. The transmit periods may be allocated to the transceiver devices randomly or in a predetermined order. There may be established field transmit and receive periods for the field station and there may generated a sync clock pulse to synchronize the clock circuits with each other.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings.
There is shown in
Controller 14, includes CPU 20,
In operation CPU 20 in controller 14 provides a succession of acknowledge sync signals from transceiver device 16a-16n which is delivered to the one or more field stations 18-18n. As shown in
During the aforementioned operation of the base station, each field station as exemplified by the following description of field station 1, 18a, is going through one or more of the following operations. Assuming for purposes of discussion that we are discussing field station 1, 18a, it might be in a standby condition where it is monitoring the condition of the sensor for example. If during that monitoring period the field station determines that the synchronism of its clock 34 with the clock of the base station 24 is slipping, it will turn on and seek to find an acknowledge sync signal. Since it turns on at point 80, well after the acknowledge sync signal has been sent at 50 and 52, it awaits the next acknowledge sync signal at 58, 60, at which time it once again synchronizes its clock, 82, with the base station and returns to the monitoring state 84.
Alternatively, while the field station is in a monitoring condition, 86, it may be triggered by either a sensor event or a so-called “watch dog” event. A watch dog event occurs simply because the timer has been set to force the field station to communicate after a certain period of time, even if it has nothing to say, just to ensure that it is still operative. Thus, either a sensor event or a watch dog event triggers the field station at 88. Assuming at this point that it has synchronism between its clock circuit and that of the base station, it waits until its slot 62 becomes available, and transmits and then waits 92. Then turns its receiver on at 94 and receives an acknowledgement 96 that its transmission 90 has been properly received. It then returns to the monitor state 98.
Alternatively with the field station once again in a monitoring mode 100 waiting for a sensor event or a watch dog event, a trigger occurs at 102 after which the system waits for its slot to transmit at 104, and then waits again at 106. But now it receives nothing back at 108 because the path between this particular field station and the transceiver device, C, 16c, is blocked. At this point the field station waits again 110, then transmits once again in its own slot 112 and waits again 114. Now it receives an acknowledge sync from transceiver device, B, 16b, instead of C, 16c and since the message has been received at 118 the system goes back to the monitoring state at 120. Thus, any time the path between a field station and a particular one of the operative transceiver devices, 16a-16n is blocked, the field station will simply recycle and attempt to retransmit until it finds a path to at least one of the transceiver devices, 16a-16n, so it can communicate fully with the base station. Although the explanation of field station 1, 18a in
The operation and method of this invention is shown with respect to field stations in
The method and operation of the base station begins with selecting the active base station remote transceiver via a random or pre-selected sequence method, 200
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/449,455 filed May 30, 2003, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/072,446, filed Jan. 26, 2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5551073 | Sammarco | Aug 1996 | A |
6459989 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473410 | Sakoda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504837 | Menzel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6810022 | Young | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6901066 | Helgeson | May 2005 | B1 |
6950521 | Marcovici et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7672683 | Neilson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20010021655 | Maeshima | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010030956 | Chillariga et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020136170 | Struhsaker | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040090948 | Forssell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040209640 | Urban et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040242249 | Neilson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018643 | Neilson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036478 | Neilson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052287 | Whitesmith et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050243867 | Petite | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271028 | Proctor | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9946745 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0070572 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0251177 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from corresponding PCT/US2004/017019 mailed Feb. 21, 2005. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from corresponding PCT/US2004/017019 mailed Feb. 21, 2005. |
“Announcing the PressureSaver,” Accutech, 1 page. |
“Monitoring Plant Wide Plastics Processing Parameters,” Accutech, Plastics Application Sheet 06, 2003, 4 pages. |
“Wireless Systems: Measure, Monitor & Control”, Accutech, Wireless Instrumentation Brochure, May 2003, 4 pages. |
“Wireless: Relief Valve Monitoring”, Accutech, Relief Valve Application Sheet 05, 2003, 2 pages. |
“Wireless: Steam Trap Monitoring”, Accutech, Steam Trap Application Sheet 05, 2003, 2 pages. |
“Wireless: Verifying CIP”, Accutech, CIP Application Sheet, 2003, 2 pages. |
Accutech TM, Product Overview, 1999, 4 pages. |
Adaptive Instruments, “AI-1500 Smart, Two-Wire Temperature Transmitter with Hart® Communications for Industrial Thermocouple or RTD Temperature Measurements”, 2002, 12 pages. |
Adaptive Instruments, “Model AI-1000, Revision 2, Two-Wire “Programmable” Transmitter for: Industrial Thermocouple or RTD Temperature Measurements brochure,” 1998, 6 pages. |
Adaptive Instruments, “Model AI-2000, Revision 4, Two Wire “Smart” Temperature Transmitter for High-Precision Industrial Temperature Measurements”, 1995, 6 pages. |
Adaptive Instruments, Standard Element Technology Brochures, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100120457 A1 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12072446 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 12687664 | US | |
Parent | 10449455 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 12072446 | US |