Non-invasive biomarker to identify subject at risk of preterm delivery

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10408838
  • Patent Number
    10,408,838
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 19, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • NYU Winthrop Hospital (Mineola, NY, US)
  • Examiners
    • Heyer; Dennis
    Agents
    • Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Abstract
Methods for diagnosis to allow prediction of the likelihood of preterm birth based upon the concentration of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS) in cervical vaginal secretions. In addition, specific prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists may represent novel tocolytic therapeutics.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to methods for diagnosis of increased risk for preterm delivery during pregnancy. The invention also relates to compositions and methods for applications of specific prostaglandin D2 receptor (DP1 and DP2) antagonists as novel tocolytic therapeutic agents. The invention relates to applications wherein women with a diagnosis of preterm labor or at significant risk for preterm delivery, based on medical history and/or other factors, might be tested. The invention also relates to applications wherein pregnant women generally may be tested at 28 weeks of pregnancy to assess the likelihood of preterm delivery.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of infant healthcare spending and 10% of all childcare spending in the United States. In addition, medical costs from birth to one year of age are 10-fold greater for babies born premature and/or at low-birth weight when compared to those for babies born full-term. The rate of preterm birth has steadily increased by 20% since 1990, with 12.5% of all U.S. births being preterm births. Thus, there is a clear and significant need to understand the biological and molecular mechanisms leading to preterm birth, as well as to improve a physician's ability to predict which women are at risk for preterm delivery.


There are approximately 500,000 preterm births per year in the United States, of which approximately 30-70% are associated with an underlying infectious process. Infection is a major risk factor for pre-term birth after the most consistently identified risks factors, which include: a history of preterm birth, current multi-fetal pregnancy, and some uterine and/or cervical abnormalities. The ability to identify high-risk pregnancies at an early stage will lead to a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm birth and most likely reduce the incidence of fetal demise, decrease the rate of cerebral palsy, and other neuro-developmental delays. By improving our ability to identify those at risk of preterm birth, we also provide for the development of new and more effective treatments for preterm labor.


There is little overlap between the current biomarkers of preterm birth, suggesting that these various biomarkers predict different pathways that lead to preterm birth, and suggesting that the creation of a highly predictive biomarker would be beneficial. Currently, there are a handful of biomarkers which attempt to predict preterm labor in advance in order to prevent preterm delivery. These biomarkers include fetal fibronectin, salivary estriol, decidual proteins, and endocrinelparacrine. Fetal fibronectin and salivary estriol have been examined in some detail, with fetal fibronectin now being made available commercially. The fetal fibronectin test is based on the detection of fetal fibronectin, a fetal-specific glycosylated form of fibronectin. The theory is that increased amounts of fetal fibronectin signal the disturbance of the junction of the fetal membranes and the placental deciduas and therefore predicts delivery. In symptomatic pregnant women, the test has only limited effectiveness (58% sensitivity) to predict preterm delivery before the completion of 37 weeks gestation. The main benefit of the present test is the ability to exclude the possibility of preterm delivery (85% specificity) and to avoid unnecessary interventions. Parturition is comprised of 5 events: (1) membrane rupture; (2) cervical dilation; (3) myometrial contaction; (4) placental separation; and (5) uterine involution. While previously available tests might focus on detection of only a subset of these five events (and thus potentially lead to a heightened likelihood for “false positives” in the detection of a purported increased likelihood of preterm birth conditions), the present invention relates to a novel method for heightened sensitivity (e.g., detection of a unified factor relating to all 5 significant steps in parturition), coupled with a more practical effectiveness to diagnosis and possibly treat or prevent a broader range of potential preterm birth conditions. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,919,889; 5,096,830; 5,223,440; 5,281,522; 5,431,171; 5,468,619; 5,516,702; 5,597,700; 5,641,636; 5,650,394; 5,698,404; 5,783,396; 5,877,029; 5,891,722; 5,968,758; 6,126,597; 6,126,616; 6,140,099; 6,149,590; 6,267,722; 6,312,393; 6,394,952; 6,544,193; 6,556,977; 6,610,480; 6,678,669; 6,867,051; 6,875,567; 6,936,476; 7,041,063; 7,191,068; 7,228,295; 7,270,970; 7,403,805; 7,488,585; 7,524,636; 7,528,133; 7,654,957; 7,709,272; 7,756,559; 7,809,417; 7,811,279; 7,863,007; 7,943,294; 8,060,195; 8,068,990; 8,114,610; 8,133,859; 8,160,692; 8,366,640; 8,372,581; 8,501,688; 8,517,960; 8,552,364; U.S. Pat. Pub. Nos. 20010023419; 20010025140; 20010053876; 20020031513; 20020046054; 20020049389; 20030004906; 20030099651; 20030105731; 20030113319; 20030139687; 20040014063; 20040039297; 20040039298; 20040078219; 20040100376; 20040197930; 20040241752; 20040266025; 20050101841; 20050131287; 20050163771; 20050260683; 20050277912; 20060008923; 20060014302; 20060024722; 20060024723; 20060024724; 20060024725; 20060024757; 20060040337; 20060166242; 20060166295; 20060204532; 20060240495; 20060240498; 20070016074; 20070128589; 20070142718; 20070161125; 20080009552; 20080090759; 20080254479; 20080299594; 20090036761; 20090055099; 20090058072; 20090068692; 20090081206; 20090171234; 20090227036; 20090299212; 20100008911; 20100017143; 20100029006; 20100093621; 20100145180; 20100311190; 20100318025; 20110028807; 20110040161; 20110065139; 20110090048; 20110159533; 20110166070; 20110184254; 20110237972; 20110312927; 20110312928; 20120009609; 20120040356; 20120046261; 20120052595; 20120082598; 20120157422; 20120196285; 20120202740; 20120238469; 20120238894; 20120270747; 20130029957; 20130053670; 20130071865; 20130171672; 20130177485; and 20130225922, each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.


Measurement of changes in Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS) levels in human cervicovaginal fluid has been suggested as a possible indicator of membrane rupture during pregnancy. Shiki Y, Shimoya K, Tokugawa Y, Kimura T, Koyama M, Azuma C, Murata Y, Eguchi N, Oda H, Urade Y 2004 Changes of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase level during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:65-70 (37), each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.


Rachel J. A. Helliwell, Jeffrey A. Keelan, Keith W. Marvin, Linda Adams, Maxwell C. Chang, Ashmit Anand, Timothy A. Sato, Simon O'Carroll, Tinnakom Chaiworapongsa, Roberto J. Romero, and Murray D. Mitchell, “Gestational Age-Dependent Up-Regulation of Prostaglandin D Synthase (PGDS) and Production of PGDS-Derived Antiinflammatory Prostaglandins in Human Placenta”, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 91 no. 2 pp. 597-606 (Feb. 1, 2006), each of which is expressly incorporated by reference, discuss that The two isoforms of PGDS (L-PGDS and H-PGDS) immunolocalized to distinct regions of human term and preterm gestational tissues. In placental villous tissues, specific labeling for L-PGDS was identified in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of both preterm and term placenta, with prominent staining of the apical membrane. At term, cytoplasmic syncytial staining was readily apparent in the syncytium, giving rise to a characteristic beaded appearance. Similarly, strong H-PGDS immunolabeling was observed in the syncytial layer of the preterm placenta. However, cellular localization of H-PGDS appeared to change with gestational age, and by term, immunoreactive H-PGDS was mainly localized to cells lining the villous capillaries, with little or no labeling observed in the syncytium. Labeling was completely absent in the corresponding negative controls in which primary antibody was preincubated with a 10-fold excess of blocking peptide or was omitted completely. In gestational membranes collected from both preterm and term pregnancies, strong immunolabeling for L-PGDS was observed in the cells of all tissues, including amnion epithelial, reticular, chorionic trophoblast, and decidual cells. In contrast, only very weak labeling of the gestational membranes was observed for H-PGDS. No labeling was observed in the corresponding negative controls. No significant staining of infiltrating leukocytes was apparent, although on some slides occasional cells positive for L- or H-PGDS were visualized among maternal blood cells. There was no statistical difference in the net amount of H-PGDS in any tissue as a result of the onset of labor at term or the presence of intrauterine infection preterm. Immunoreactive L-PGDS was undetectable in gestational tissues. L-PGDS mRNA was detectable in amnion, choriodecidual, and villous placental samples There was no significant effect of preterm intrauterine infection or term labor on the level of expression of L-PGDS mRNA. L-PGDS mRNA levels were significantly higher in the choriodecidua and placenta than in the amnion. There was no significant difference in the level of expression between the choriodecidua and placenta. The expression of H-PGDS mRNA was detectable in all three tissues, with no significant effect of preterm intrauterine infection or labor at term. Analyzing the combined data for each tissue revealed that the relative expression of H-PGDS mRNA was lowest in the amnion and choriodecidua, with a significantly higher level of expression in the villous placenta.


See also, Olson D M, Ammann C, “Role of the prostaglandins in labour and prostaglandin receptor inhibitors in the prevention of preterm labour”, Front Biosci.; 12:1329-43 (Jan. 1, 2007), and Pirianov G, Waddington S N, Lindstrom T M, Terzidou V, Mehmet H, Bennett P R, “The cyclopentenone 15-deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 delays lipopolysaccharide-induced preterm delivery and reduces mortality in the newborn mouse”, Endocrinology 150(2):699-706 (Epub 2008 Oct. 9, February 20909), each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,399,596 and US 20070020609, expressly incorporated herein by reference, discusses using L-PGDS levels to predict pregnancy-induced hypertension. See also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,902,373, 7,794,953, 7,582,643, 7,314,727, 7,109,044, 6,790,635, 6,605,705, 6,410,583, 20110021599, 20100323911, 20100251394, 20080233597, 20080227113, 20070196864, 20070003992, 20040038314, 20030190678, each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.


Specific DP1/DP2 agonists and antagonists are available, e.g., BW245C (5-(6-carboxyhexyl)-1-(3-cyclohexyl-3-hydroxypropyl-hydantoin), AS702224, TS-022, 15R-methyl-PGD2, 13-14-dihydro-15-keto-PGD2, AM156, AM206, L-745870, 15R-PGD(2), MK-0524, BWA868C, BW24-SC, BAY-u3405, 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), 11-deoxy-11-methylene PGD2, G06983 (PKCα,Δ,ε,δ), G06976 (PKCα), GF10923X (PKCα,Δ,ε), LY333531 (PKC β), SB203580 (p38MAPK), SB203580, CD200, FGF18, GPRC5D, GPR49, LRRC15, Serpin A, CDT6, BMP2, LHX2, THBS1, MYCN, NR4A2, MEST, TM4SF1, CRLF1, TNFRSF12A, SELENBP1, GPR161, HEPH, FZD7, and CLIC4, CCL18, Col11A1, Col3A1, CD4, Cd1a, FCER1A, HLA-C, HLA-DPA1, IGF1, GPR105, PDGFRL, ADRA2A, CCL19, CORN, 16-phenoxy-17,18,19,20-tetranor PGD2 N-cyclopropylamide, 16-phenoxy-17,18,19,20-tetranor PGD1 N-cyclopropylmethylamide, 16-phenoxy-17,18,19,20-PGD1N-(1,3-dihydroxypropan-2-yl))amide; 17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor PGD2 N-cyclopropylamide, 17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor PGD1 N-cyclopropylmethylamide, 17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor PGD2N-(1,3-dihydroxypropan-2-yl))amide; 16-(3-chlorophenyl)-17,18,19,20-tetranor PGD2 N-cyclopropylamide, 16-(3-chlorophenyl)-17,18,19,20-tetranor PGD1 N-cyclopropylmethylamide, 6-(3-chlorophenyl)-17,18,19,20-tetranor PGD1 N-(1,3-dihydroxypropan-2-yl))amide, (Z)-isopropyl 7-((R)-2-((R)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)hept-5-enoate, (Z)-isopropyl 7-((R)-2-((R,E)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-enyl)-5-oxo-cyclopent-2-enyl)hept-5-enoate, (Z)—N-ethyl-7-((R)-2-((R,E)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)hept-5-enamide, (Z)—N-ethyl-7-((R)-2-((S,E)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpent-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopen-t-2-enyl)hept-5-enamide, (Z)-7-((R)-2-((R,E)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)hept-5-enoic acid, (Z)-7-((R)-2-((R,E)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)-N-methylhept-5-enamide, (Z)-7-((R)-2-((R,E)-4-(3-chlorophenoxy)-3-hydroxybut-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclope-nt-2-enyl)hept-5-enoic acid, (Z)-isopropyl 7-((R)-2-((R,E)-4-(3-chlorophenoxy)-3-hydroxybut-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)hept-5-enoate, (Z)-7-((R)-2-((R,E)-4-(3-chlorophenoxy)-3-hydroxybut-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)-N-methylhept-5-enamide or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, solvate, prodrug or metabolite thereof. These agents may be used alone or in combination, and may be administered concurrently or sequentially. See also, 2011/0144160, 2011/0130453, 2011/0112134, 2011/0098352, 2011/0098302, 2011/0071175, 2011/0060026, 2011/0034558, 2011/0028717, 2011/0021599, 2011/0021573, 2011/0002866, 2010/0330077, each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention describes, for example, methods to apply and correlate the clinical measurement of L-PGDS concentrations of cervical vaginal secretions from pregnant women with the attendant likelihood of term or preterm delivery.


The invention also describes methods and compositions, specifically prostaglandin D2 (DP1 and DP2) receptor antagonists or inhibitors, as potential tocolytic agents.


It is therefore an object to provide a method for assessing the likelihood of preterm delivery for a pregnant woman, the method comprising collecting a cervical vaginal secretion sample from a pregnant woman; and measuring lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS) concentration levels from the sample, wherein L-PGDS concentration levels correlate to and indicate an above or below average likelihood relative to the relevant standard population for preterm delivery.


According to one embodiment, an L-PGDS concentration level higher than 1.8 μg/ml indicates an increased likelihood for preterm delivery.


The method may advantageously be applied to a pregnant woman has intact amniotic membranes.


The cervical vaginal secretion may be collected with a sponge.


Based on the L-PGDS level, at least one prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist may be administered as a tocolytic agent. The at least one prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist may comprises a DP1 receptor antagonist and/or a DP2 receptor antagonist.


The L-PGDS concentration level may be determined using an antibody sandwich Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA). The L-PGDS concentration levels may be normalized to protein levels in the cervical vaginal secretions for analysis.


Another object provides a method for treatment of preterm labor, comprising administration of a therapeutic amount of at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist to a pregnant woman such that preterm delivery is avoided or mitigated.


The administration may be selectively in dependence on a measured L-PGDS level, for example in a cervical vaginal secretion.


The at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist comprises one or more agents selected from the group consisting of AM156 ({2′-[(cyclopropanecarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-6-methoxy-4′-trifluoro-methyl-biphenyl-3-yl}-acetic acid, sodium salt), and AM206 (5-{2-[(benzoyloxycarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl}-pyridin-3-yl)-acetic acid, sodium salt), MK-0524 ([(3R)-4-(4-Chloro-benzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[b]indol-3-yl]-acetic Acid), AM-853 (2-(4-(4-(tert-butylcarbamoyl)-2-(2-chloro-4-cyclopropylphenyl sulfonamido)phenoxy)-5-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid), BW868C (3-benzyl-5-(6-carbohexyl)-1-(2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxyethylamino)-hydantoin), S-5751 ((Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-2-(5-hydroxy benzo[b]thiophen-3-ylcarbonylamino)-10-norpinan-3-yl]hept-5-enoic acid), and BAY-u3405 (Ramatroban, 3(R)-[[(4-fluorophenyl) sulphonyl]amino]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazole-9-propanoic acid).


Alternately, an L-PGDS inhibitor may be used, for example, AT-56 (4-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene-1-[4-(2H-tetrazol-5-yl)-butyl]-piperidine).


Resveratrol has been shown to reduce formation of Prostaglandin D2 presumably by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX), especially COX-2. See, Lena Wendeburg, Antonio Carlos Pinheiro de Oliveira, Harsharan S Bhatia, Eduardo Candelario-Jalil and Bernd L Fiebich, “Resveratrol inhibits prostaglandin formation in IL-1β-stimulated SK-N-SH neuronal cells”, J. Neuroinflammation 2009, 6:26, expressly incorporated herein by reference. Therefore, resveratrol or another non-teratogenic COX-2 inhibitor may advantageously be employed.


The at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist is administered orally, by inhalation, through a mucous membrane, transdermally, topically, rectally, or parenterally.


The at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist may be administered to achieve concurrent therapeutic effect with another tocolytic agent which is not a prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist. For example, the other tocolytic agent may comprise a β2 agonist, such as terbutaline, Ritodrine, Fenoterol, or Salbutamol. The other tocolytic agent may also comprise a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug cyclooxygenase inhibitor, such as Indomethicin or sulindac. The tocolytic may be a calcium channel blocker, such as nifedipine, a myosin light chain inhibitor such as magnesium sulfate, or an axytocin inhibitor such as Atosiban.


A further object provides a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a therapeutic amount of a non-teratogenic comprising at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist and/or an L-PGDS inhibitor, in an effective amount to delay preterm delivery in a pregnant human when administered in repeated doses. The at least one prostaglandin DP1 or prostaglandin DP2 receptor antagonist may comprise, for example, one or more agents selected from the group consisting of AM156 ({2′-[(cyclopropanecarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-6-methoxy-4′-trifluoro-methyl-biphenyl-3-yl}-acetic acid, sodium salt), and AM206 (5-{2-[(benzoyloxycarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl}-pyridin-3-yl)-acetic acid, sodium salt), MK-0524 ([(3R)-4-(4-Chloro-benzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[b]indol-3-yl]-acetic Acid), AM-853 (2-(4-(4-(tert-butylcarbamoyl)-2-(2-chloro-4-cyclopropylphenyl sulfonamido)phenoxy)-5-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid), BW868C (3-benzyl-5-(6-carbohexyl)-1-(2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxyethylamino)-hydantoin), S-5751 ((Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-2-(5-hydroxy benzo[b]thiophen-3-ylcarbonylamino)-10-norpinan-3-yl]hept-5-enoic acid), and BAY-u3405 (Ramatroban, 3(R)-[[(4-fluorophenyl) sulphonyl]amino]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazole-9-propanoic acid), and the L-PGDS inhibitor may comprise AT-56 (4-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene-1-[4-(2H-tetrazol-5-yl)-butyl]-piperidine).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B present data from a preliminary study of samples of pregnant women correlating L-PGDS levels in cervical vaginal secretions with term or preterm delivery.



FIG. 2 present data from a study of samples of pregnant women correlating L-PGDS levels in cervical vaginal secretions with term or preterm delivery.



FIG. 3 presents data from (murine) animal studies to demonstrate the relationship between lower L-PGDS levels and likelihood of viability and successful term birth.



FIG. 4 shows 2D PAGE of Human CVS L-PGDS Isoforms.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Methods and Procedures for Risk Assessment for Preterm Delivery.


Cervical vaginal secretions (CVS) are readily collected and constitute a minimally invasive procedure. During a sterile speculum examination of a pregnant woman, a Week-gel sponge is applied into the cervical os for approximately one minute. The sponge is then removed and placed in a buffer solution containing physiological saline, Trizma buffer, protease inhibitors (EDTA, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin) and antibacterial agents (such as sodium azide). This sample collection process is very similar to that used for other routine clinical assays (e.g., fetal fibronectin) that use cervical secretions for the starting sample material. Preferably, the buffer solution has a low protein concentration, e.g., is produced with a small amount or no bovine serum albumin (BSA). This BSA is not required to stabilize the L-PGDS, and may interfere with its measurement.


L-PGDS concentration levels from the cervical vaginal secretion samples are then determined by an antibody sandwich ELISA. As an initial step, antibody against L-PGDS raised in rabbits is purified by hydroxyapatite chromatography, followed by an immunoaffinity purification on an Affi-Gel 15 Gel column.


The purified antibody is then diluted to 10 μg/ml in 0.2M sodium carbonate buffer, pH 9.0, and 50 μl added to each well of an Nunc-Immuno plate with Maxi Sorp surface overnight at 4° C. The wells are then washed with 0.1% BSA/0.05% Tween 20 in PBS 4 times and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour. Diluted plasmas or L-PGDS standards (1.2 to 75 ng/ml) are incubated in Block for 90 minutes, then washed as above. A secondary anti-L-PGDS antibody, raised in chickens, at 4 ng/ml in wash buffer, is incubated in the wells for 1 hour and then washed, as above. Horseradish peroxidase-tagged goat anti-chicken antibody at 1:10,000 in wash buffer is added for 1 hour and then the plate is washed, as above, developed in a 0.01 3,3′, 5,5′ tetramethylbenzidine solution, stopped with 50 μl of 1N sulfuric acid, and read at 450 nm in a microplate reader. L-PGDS concentration is determined by the standard curve obtained by plotting the absorbance versus the corresponding concentration of an L-PGDS standard.


This assay is also adapted to a BioPlex suspension array for similar quantitation. The assay is also amenable for development to run the samples on a 2-D PAGE and determine the particular L-PGDS isoforms present/absent from the CVS samples that may be indicative of an increased propensity toward preterm birth. It is understood and believed that an antibody to the specific isoform may be created to fine-tune the detection method.


In assessing test samples, L-PGDS concentrations determined by ELISA are normalized to protein levels in the CVS. Protein content of the samples is determined by BCA method, which has been commonly used to quantitate protein levels in cell lysates.


The new markers of the present invention are highly sensitive and specific (e.g., 90% or higher). In an preliminary study, at a level of 90% specificity, the sample size yields a 95% confidence level, indicating high precision, with a margin of error of about 5%. The collection of test data from pregnant women is ongoing and studies producing significant results have been established as demonstrated in the following Table 1.









TABLE 1







CVS L-PGDS (ng/ml)








Term
Preterm














Patient
CVS
Term
Days to
Patient
CVS
Preterm
Days to


ID #
(weeks)
Delivery
Delivery
ID #
(weeks)
Delivery
Delivery

















17
26
607
84
20
30
7653
11


19
26
725
86
21
30
4839
24


24
26
818
93
23
32
2589
2


26
31
1163
58
28
28
1033
2


27
33
282
32
30
32
4926
1


29
25
782
85
MEAN
30
4208
8


31
25
872

SEM
1
761
3


33
30
1798
57


34
29
2717
66


36
25
1056


37
27
1308


MEAN
28
1103
70


SEM
1
201
6





Notes:


Current samples collected at between 28-30 weeks of gestation


Level of L-PGDS ~4-fold higher than in pregnancies that go to term


Average time until delivery based on elevated L-PGDS 8 days vs. 70 days with lower levels


Currently a cutoff of <1.8 μg/ml L-PGDS would appear to distinguish ~91% of term deliveries






Statistical analysis of this data indicates that high L-PGDS levels (i.e., L-PGDS levels above 1.8 μg/ml) predict an increased likelihood of preterm delivery in human subjects. Graphical illustration of this analysis is depicted in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Findings from the studies indicate that L-PGDS levels in pregnant women susceptible to preterm delivery average a 4-fold increase over levels in women whose pregnancies go to term, and that the average time until delivery for women with elevated L-PGDS levels is 8 days, compared to 70 days for those women that do not demonstrate such elevated levels.


The pattern of elevated L-PGDS in preterm is generally consistent with the predicted rise. Because the L-PGDS level has a normal change over gestation, CVS samples are preferably taken and L-PGDS assays performed every two weeks.


A key advantage of this assay over the current fetal fibronectin (fFN) test is that the present assay would predict preterm birth over the entire gestational period up to parturition. A negative fFN, although very accurate, is only valid for a 2-week window. Interestingly, in the study reported below, there were several samples that were fFN negative, but ultimately went preterm. The present assay showed elevated L-PGDS, and was predictive for preterm birth.



FIG. 2 shows results from a larger study. The data shows that for 163 patients, 36 were preterm (birth less than 37 weeks gestation), with a median of L-PGDS of 8,566 ng/ml/ng protein and 127 went to term with an median of 28,247 ng/ml/ng protein. Results showed that difference in the median values between the two groups is greater than would be expected by chance; there is a statistically significant difference (P=<0.001). See Table 2.









TABLE 2







Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test












Group
N
Missing
Median
25%
75%















Preterm
36
0
28247.587
17051.503
47944.682


Term
127
0
8566.720
4663.511
12857.063





Mann-Whitney U Statistic = 694.000


T = 4544.000 n(small) = 36 n(big) = 127 (P = <0.001)






The difference in the median values between the two groups is greater than would be expected by chance; there is a statistically significant difference (P=<0.001)


Animal studies conducted to determine the correlations between L-PGDS concentrations and birth viability and/or risk of preterm birth were conducted with L-PGDS knockout mice and transgenic L-PGDS overexpressor mice. Results are demonstrated in FIG. 3. The studies strongly validate the present findings that lower concentration levels of L-PGDS tend to increase the chances of successful term birth, as per the present murine model. The findings from these animal studies cross-validate the findings from human studies (e.g., as presented above in Table 1).


Table 3 shows data demonstrating that in LPS-induced preterm birth, there is a three-fold increase in viable mouse pups/pregnancy in the L-PGDS knockouts and a 15-fold decrease in viable pups/pregnancy in the L-PGDS transgenic overexpressors when compared to the C57BL/6 controls. This implies that L-PGDS is casually related to preterm birth, and not merely correlated with it.













TABLE 3









C57BL/6
L-PGDS KO
L-PGDS KI




























Experiment #
1
2
3
4
5
Total
SEM
1
2
3
4
5
Total
SEM
1
2
3
4
5
Total
SEM































Pregnant
2
4
3
5
3
17
0.5
0
3
2
3
2
10
0.5
0
1
4
4
6
15
1.1


Females


Viable Pups
1
5
0
5
7
18
1.3
0
8
9
16
0
33
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0.2


Adverse
15
19
21
12
10
77
2.1
0
2
1
11
2
16
2.0
0
4
23
25
56
108
9.9


Outcome


Viable





1.06






3.30






0.07


Pups/Pregnancy









In a study of pregnant C57BL/6 mice implanted with Alzet osmotic pumps containing both DP1 and DP2 antagonists (BWA868C and 11-deoxy-11-methylene prostaglandin D2 at 1.0 μg/μl or PBS vehicle) were injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (20 μg) at day 14 of pregnancy to induce preterm birth. In the LPS-only control group, 80% suffered adverse outcomes (premature birth or fetal death), and 20% had normal outcomes. In the experimental group, LPS plus DP1 and DP2 antagonist, 50% suffered adverse outcomes and 50% had normal outcomes. This demonstrates that administration of prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists may be administered to pregnant mammals to interrupt preterm labor, and more particularly, to avoid preterm labor induced by infectious agents, especially those which produce lipopolysaccharides. Because the preterm labor pathway has common elements, it is likely that the prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists will also act to block preterm labor from other causes.


Chemical compounds which influence the levels of L-PGDS in pregnant women might be administered as tocolytic therapeutic agents. Preferred embodiments of such effective tocolytic agents include prostaglandin D2 (DP1 or DP2) receptor antagonists, such as BWA868C, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,395,499; 6,878,522; 6,884,593; 7,144,913; 7,217,725; 7,517,889; 7,642,249; 8,067,445; 8,071,807; 8,193,183; 8,242,145; 8,338,484; 8,362,044; 8,378,107; 8,383,654; 8,426,449; 8,497,381; 8,501,959; 8,524,748; U.S. Pat Pub. Nos. 20020022218; 20030027854; 20040162323; 20040180934; 20040185509; 20040197834; 20050215609; 20070054951; 20070244131; 20070249686; 20070265278; 20070265291; 20080194600; 20080261922; 20090036469; 20090176804; 20090197959; 20100004331; 20100075990; 20100081673; 20100113503; 20100130574; 20100298368; 20110021573; 20110039852; 20110098302; 20110098352; 20110112134; 20110130453; 20110144160; 20110152338; 20110190227; 20110245303; 20110301168; 20110312974; 20110318308; 20110319445; 20120004233; 20120016029; 20120022119; 20120058123; 20120059055; 20130005728; 20130005741; 20130065902; 20130079375; 20130109685; 20130158036; each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Methods of treatment and preventing preterm delivery include the administration of a therapeutic amount of prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists to a pregnant woman in need thereof. Proper routes of administration, dosages and frequencies of administration of these tocolytic agent prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists may be readily determined by one of skill in the art, e.g., medical practitioners.


More particularly, the present invention provides for methods of treating preterm labor via the administration of pharmaceutical compositions comprising active tocolytic therapeutic agents with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Pharmaceutical composition of the present invention are intended to encompass a product comprising the active ingredient(s), e.g., prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists, and the inert ingredient(s) (pharmaceutically acceptable excipients) that constitute the carrier, as well as any product which may result, directly or indirectly, from combination, complex formation or aggregation of any two or more of the ingredients, or from dissociation of one or more of the ingredients, or form other types of reactions or interactions of one or more of the ingredients.


For example, available prostaglandin D2 (DP1/DPGTR, DP2/CRTH2) receptor antagonists include AM156 ({2′-[(cyclopropanecarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-6-methoxy-4′-trifluoro-methyl-biphenyl-3-yl}-acetic acid, sodium salt), and AM206 (5-{2-[(benzoyloxycarbonyl-ethyl-amino)-methyl]-4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl}-pyridin-3-yl)-acetic acid, sodium salt), MK-0524 ([(3R)-4-(4-Chloro-benzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[b]indol-3-yl]acetic Acid), AM-853 (2-(4-(4-(tert-butylcarbamoyl)-2-(2-chloro-4-cyclopropylphenyl sulfonamido)phenoxy)-5-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid), BW868C (3-benzyl-5-(6-carbohexyl)-1-(2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxyethylamino)-hydantoin), S-5751 ((Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-2-(5-hydroxy benzo[b]thiophen-3-ylcarbonylamino)-10-norpinan-3-yl]hept-5-enoic acid), BAY-u3405 (Ramatroban, 3(R)-[[(4-fluorophenyl) sulphonyl]amino]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazole-9-propanoic acid). Such agents, or others that are known or become known, may be used alone, in combination or subcombination. In some cases, the effects may be enhanced by selectively acting on DP1 or DP2, and therefore appropriate agents may be selected. Likewise, as may be appropriate, a mixed agonist/antagonist comprising a single or multiple agents, may be administered or concurrently administered.


For the treatment of preterm labor, the tocolytic therapeutic agents may be administered orally, by inhalation spray, topically, transdermally, parenterally or rectally in dosage unit formulations containing conventional non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, adjuvants and vehicles. The term parenteral as used herein includes subcutaneous injections, intravenous, intramuscular, intrasternal injection or infusion techniques. Tocolytic therapeutic agents, e.g., prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists, may be co-administered with other therapeutic agents and are suitable for simultaneous and/or sequential combination therapies. Methods of the present invention further encompass co-administration to a pregnant woman of a non-toxic therapeutically effective amount of a tocolytic therapeutic agent, such as a prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist, optionally with other active therapeutic agents, e.g., other prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists, either simultaneously or sequentially as part of a combination therapy treatment regimen. Similarly, a selective L-PGDS inhibitor, such as AT-56 (4-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene-1-[4-(2H-tetrazol-5-yl)-butyl]-piperidine) may be used alone or in combination with a DP1 and/or a DP2 antagonist. The therapeutic amounts of active therapeutic agents as administered in combination therapy may be those as commonly used for each active therapeutic agent when administered alone, or the amounts may result in lower dosage(s) for one or more of the active therapeutic agents.


As shown in FIG. 4, different isoforms of L-PGDS appear in preterm birth CVS samples than for at term births. Therefore, a selective immunoassay may be implemented based on the ability of certain antibodies to distinguish between the isoforms. Immunoassays may include radio immunoassays, enzyme-linked immunoassays, fluorescent immunoassays, and the like.


On the other hand in a ratiometric assay which seeks to determine a ratio between isoforms, or between a single isoform and the total, during purification, it may be preferred to avoid selective enrichment, and thus immunopurification may employ a non-specific antibody or a balanced mix of antibodies to ensure that the CVS sample concentrations are not altered during processing. Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for predicting preterm delivery of a fetus, comprising: collecting a cervical vaginal secretion sample from a pregnant woman having an intact amniotic membrane;measuring with an immunoassay lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS) concentration in the collected cervical vaginal secretion sample; anddetermining a likelihood of preterm delivery based on a comparison of the measured lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase concentration to corresponding values from a gestational age-matched population.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the L-PGDS concentration in the cervical vaginal secretion rises prior to rupture in membranes.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase concentration comprises measuring ratios of isoforms of L-PGDS in the collected cervical vaginal secretion sample.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cervical vaginal secretion is collected with a sponge.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the sponge is treated with at least a protease inhibitor and a bacteriocide.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein L-PGDS levels of above 1.8 μg/ml indicate the increased likelihood of preterm delivery.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the likelihood of preterm delivery is the likelihood of preterm delivery within a period greater than 2 weeks.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the pregnant woman is at week 28 of gestation or later.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeating cervical vaginal secretion collection from the pregnant woman and L-PGDS measurement every two weeks.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising delaying the preterm delivery by administering to the pregnant woman a composition comprising a tocolytic agent.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the tocolytic agent is a β2 agonist, an NSAID cyclooxygenase inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, a prostaglandin DP1 or DP2 receptor antagonist, or an oxytocin inhibitor.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the L-PGDS concentration is measured using a radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunoassay, or fluorescent immunoassay.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring L-PGDS comprises contacting the cervical vaginal secretion sample with at least one antibody against L-PGDS.
  • 14. The method of claim 2, wherein measuring L-PGDS concentration comprises contacting the cervical vaginal secretion sample with multiple antibodies against isoforms of L-PGDS.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the cervical vaginal secretion sample is collected at or after 25 weeks gestation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/438,110, entitled NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKER TO IDENTIFY SUBJECT AT RISK OF PRETERM DELIVERY and filed Apr. 23, 2015, which is a 371 national phase of International Application No. PCT/2013/066490, filed Oct. 24, 2013 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/717,724, filed Oct. 24, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (233)
Number Name Date Kind
4919889 Jones et al. Apr 1990 A
5096830 Senyei et al. Mar 1992 A
5223440 Teng et al. Jun 1993 A
5281522 Senyei et al. Jan 1994 A
5431171 Harrison et al. Jul 1995 A
5468619 Senyei et al. Nov 1995 A
5516702 Senyei et al. May 1996 A
5597700 Konstantinov et al. Jan 1997 A
5641636 Strauss, III et al. Jun 1997 A
5650394 Terao et al. Jul 1997 A
5698404 Strauss, III et al. Dec 1997 A
5783396 Voroteliak et al. Jul 1998 A
5877029 Fuks et al. Mar 1999 A
5891722 Fuks et al. Apr 1999 A
5968758 Fuks et al. Oct 1999 A
6126597 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6126616 Sanyal Oct 2000 A
6140099 Strauss, III Oct 2000 A
6149590 Smith et al. Nov 2000 A
6267722 Anderson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6312393 Abreu Nov 2001 B1
6394952 Anderson et al. May 2002 B1
6395499 Abramovitz et al. May 2002 B1
6410583 Labelle et al. Jun 2002 B1
6544193 Abreu Apr 2003 B2
6556977 Lapointe et al. Apr 2003 B1
6605705 Oda Aug 2003 B1
6610480 Shimkets et al. Aug 2003 B1
6678669 Lapointe et al. Jan 2004 B2
6790635 Seiki et al. Sep 2004 B1
6867051 Anderson et al. Mar 2005 B1
6875567 Shimkets et al. Apr 2005 B1
6878522 Li et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884593 Hirai et al. Apr 2005 B1
6936476 Anderson et al. Aug 2005 B1
7041063 Abreu May 2006 B2
7109044 Oda et al. Sep 2006 B1
7144913 Wang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7191068 Rosenfeld et al. Mar 2007 B2
7217725 Krauss et al. May 2007 B2
7228295 Lapointe et al. Jun 2007 B2
7270970 Anderson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7314727 Mase et al. Jan 2008 B2
7399596 Oda Jul 2008 B2
7403805 Abreu Jul 2008 B2
7488585 Meiri Feb 2009 B2
7517889 Harris et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524636 Bryant-Greenwood et al. Apr 2009 B2
7528133 Copland, III et al. May 2009 B1
7582643 Blake et al. Sep 2009 B2
7642249 Langevin et al. Jan 2010 B2
7654957 Abreu Feb 2010 B2
7709272 Fuks et al. May 2010 B2
7756559 Abreu Jul 2010 B2
7794953 Pentyala Sep 2010 B2
7809417 Abreu Oct 2010 B2
7811279 John Oct 2010 B2
7863007 Voroteliak Jan 2011 B2
7902373 Blake et al. Mar 2011 B2
7943294 Hussa et al. May 2011 B2
8060195 Gurewitsch et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067445 Hutchinson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8068990 Rosenfeld et al. Nov 2011 B2
8071807 Hutchinson et al. Dec 2011 B2
8114610 Fuks et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133859 Kimura et al. Mar 2012 B2
8160692 Principe et al. Apr 2012 B2
8193183 Lim et al. Jun 2012 B2
8242145 Hutchinson et al. Aug 2012 B2
8338484 Hutchinson et al. Dec 2012 B2
8362044 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8366640 Bauer et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372581 Hussa et al. Feb 2013 B2
8378107 Hutchinson et al. Feb 2013 B2
8383654 Hutchinson et al. Feb 2013 B2
8426449 Hutchinson et al. Apr 2013 B2
8497381 Hutchinson et al. Jul 2013 B2
8501688 Kimura et al. Aug 2013 B2
8501959 Hutchinson et al. Aug 2013 B2
8517960 Bauer et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524748 Hutchinson et al. Sep 2013 B2
8552364 Graves et al. Oct 2013 B2
20010023419 Lapointe et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010025140 Torok et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010053876 Torok et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020022218 Li et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020031513 Leibovitz Mar 2002 A1
20020046054 Morand et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049389 Abreu Apr 2002 A1
20030004906 Lapointe et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030027854 Arimura Feb 2003 A1
20030099651 Leibovitz May 2003 A1
20030105731 Lapointe et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030113319 Leibovitz Jun 2003 A1
20030139687 Abreu Jul 2003 A1
20030190678 Mase et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040014063 Batteux et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040038314 Oda et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039297 Abreu Feb 2004 A1
20040039298 Abreu Feb 2004 A1
20040078219 Kaylor et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100376 Lye et al. May 2004 A1
20040162323 Krauss et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040180934 Wang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040185509 Gervais et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040197834 Gervais et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040197930 Rosenfeld et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040241752 Anderson et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266025 Hickok et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050101841 Kaylor et al. May 2005 A9
20050131287 Kaylor et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050163771 Leibovitz Jul 2005 A1
20050215609 Yoshikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050260683 Bryant-Greenwood et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050277912 John Dec 2005 A1
20060008923 Anderson et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060014302 Martinez et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024722 Fischer-Colbrie et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024723 Hussa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024724 Hussa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024725 Hussa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024757 Hussa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060040337 Meiri Feb 2006 A1
20060166242 Pennell et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166295 Woods et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060204532 John Sep 2006 A1
20060240495 Buhimschi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240498 Friedman et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070003992 Pentyala Jan 2007 A1
20070016074 Abreu Jan 2007 A1
20070020609 Oda et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070054951 Li et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070128589 Sanders et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142718 Abreu Jun 2007 A1
20070161125 Rosenfeld et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070196864 Pentyala Aug 2007 A1
20070244131 Lim et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070249686 Bonnert et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265278 Harris et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265291 Harris et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080009552 Pennell et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080090759 Kokenyesi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080194600 Langevin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227113 Pentyala Sep 2008 A1
20080233597 Shiina et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080254479 Kokenyesi et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261922 Carley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080299594 Rosenfeld et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090036469 Stefany et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036761 Abreu Feb 2009 A1
20090055099 Rosenfeld et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090058072 Weber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068692 Voroteliak Mar 2009 A1
20090081206 Leibovitz Mar 2009 A1
20090171234 Gurewitsch et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090176804 Yang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090197959 Hutchinson et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090227036 Meiri Sep 2009 A1
20090299212 Principe et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004331 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100008911 Streisand et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017143 Nagalla et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100029006 Rosenblatt et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100075990 Endres et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081673 Hutchinson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100093621 Kimura et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113503 Hutchinson et al. May 2010 A1
20100130574 Eggan et al. May 2010 A1
20100145180 Abreu Jun 2010 A1
20100251394 Dore Sep 2010 A1
20100298368 Stearns et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100311190 Fuks et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318025 John Dec 2010 A1
20100323911 Devarajan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330077 Armer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110002866 Lubit et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021573 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021599 Cotsarelis et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028717 Kugimiya et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110028807 Abreu Feb 2011 A1
20110034558 Brittain et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110039852 Hutchinson et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040161 Abreu Feb 2011 A1
20110060026 Hynd et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110065139 Mullerad et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071175 Hynd et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110090048 Li et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098302 Hutchinson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098352 Hutchinson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112134 Hutchinson et al. May 2011 A1
20110130453 Hutchinson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144160 Hutchinson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152338 Hutchinson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110159533 Karkouche Jun 2011 A1
20110166070 Stewart Jul 2011 A1
20110184254 Grove et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110190227 Hutchinson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110237972 Garfield et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110245303 Hutchinson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110301168 Hutchinson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110312927 Nachaegari et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110312928 Nachaegari et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110312974 Hutchinson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110318308 Ragolia Dec 2011 A1
20110319445 Hutchinson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004233 Stearns et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120009609 Fuks et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016029 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022119 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120040356 Hussa et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120046261 Manuck et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120052595 Wallace et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120058123 Hutchinson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059055 Hutchinson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120082598 Baydoun Apr 2012 A1
20120157422 Poston et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120196285 Okamoto et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120202740 Kimura et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120238469 Equils et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238894 Principe et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120270747 Elovitz Oct 2012 A1
20130005728 Harris et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130005741 Harris et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130029957 Giliyar et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130053670 Aina-Mumuney et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130065902 Aissaoui et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071865 Fuks et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079375 Endres et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130109685 Aissaoui et al. May 2013 A1
20130158036 Hutchinson et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130171672 Hussa et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130177485 Mullerad et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130225922 Schentag et al. Aug 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0 913 405 May 1999 EP
2912458 Sep 2015 EP
9309432 May 1993 WO
9309438 May 1993 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Shiki et al. in J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. vol. 30, No. 1:65-70 (2004) (Year: 2004).
Mestecky et al. in Manual for Collection and Processing of Mucosal Specimens, AVEG Mucosal Immunology Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Feb. 1999) (Year: 1999).
Helliwell et al. in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 91(2):597-606 (2006) (Year: 2006).
Olson et al. in Frontiers in Bioscience 12, 1329-1343 (2007) (Year: 2007).
Shiki et al. in J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. vol. 30, No. 1 :65-70 (2004).
Gravett et al. in J Proteome Res. 6(1 ):89-96 (2007).
Helliwell et al. in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 91 (2):597-606 (2006).
Olson et al. in Frontiers in Bioscience 12, 1329-1343 (2007).
Mestecky et al. in Manual for Collection and Processing of Mucosal Specimens, AVEG Mucosal Immunology Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Feb. 1999).
Pettipher et al. in Nature ReviewsIDrug Discovery 6,313-325 (2007).
Caritis et al. in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 150(1),7-14 (1984) (Abstract).
Zegels et al. in Proteome Science 2009, 7:17.
Communication European Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2018 in connection with European Patent Application No. 18167167.8.
Lee et al., Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 21, No. 2, Jan. 1, 2008, 89-94.
Rachel J. A. Helliwell, Jeffrey A. Keelan, Keith W. Marvin, Linda Adams, Maxwell C. Chang, Ashmit Anand, Timothy A. Sato, Simon O'Carroll, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Roberto J. Romero, and Murray D. Mitchell, “Gestational Age-Dependent Up-Regulation of Prostaglandin D Synthase (PGDS) and Production of PGDS-Derived Antiinflammatory Prostaglandins in Human Placenta”, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 91, Issue 2, pp. 597-606, (Nov. 15, 2005), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1982.
Sunil Kumar, Thomas Palaia, Christopher E. Hall, Louis Ragolia. (2015) Role of Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS) and its metabolite, prostaglandin D2, in preterm birth. Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators Online publication date: May 1, 2015.
L. Sykes, D. A. MacIntyre, T. G. Teoh, P. R. Bennett. (2014) Anti-inflammatory prostaglandins for the prevention of preterm labour. Reproduction 148, R29-R40 Online publication date: Jun. 24, 2014.
Robert J Phillips, Michel A Fortier, Andrés López Bernal. (2014) Prostaglandin pathway gene expression in human placenta, amnion and choriodecidua is differentially affected by preterm and term labour and by uterine inflammation. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14, 241 Online publication date: Jan. 1, 2014.
Lynne Sykes, David A. MacIntyre, Xiao J. Yap, Sathana Ponnampalam, Tiong Ghee Teoh, Phillip R. Bennett. (2012) Changes in the Th1:Th2 Cytokine Bias in Pregnancy and the Effects of the Anti-Inflammatory Cyclopentenone Prostaglandin 15-Deoxy-Δ 12,14-Prostaglandin J 2 . Mediators of Inflammation 2012, 1-12 Online publication date: Jan. 1, 2012.
Sara F Rinaldi, James L Hutchinson, Adriano G Rossi, Jane E Norman. (2011) Anti-inflammatory mediators as physiological and pharmacological regulators of parturition. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 7, 675-696 Online publication date: Sep. 1, 2011.
Patton, Stephanie M., Yong Won Cho, Thomas W. Clardy, Richard P. Allen, Christopher J. Earley, and James R. Connor. “Proteomic analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom.” (2013).
Grisha Pirianov, Simon N. Waddington, Tamsin M. Lindström, Vasiliki Terzidou, Huseyin Mehmet, Phillip R. Bennett. (2013) The Cyclopentenone 15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-Prostaglandin J2 Delays Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Preterm Delivery and Reduces Mortality in the Newborn Mouse. Endocrinology 150:2, 699-706 Online publication date: Feb. 1, 2009.
Khan, Abdul H., Ray J. Carson, and Scott M. Nelson. “Prostaglandins in labor—a translational approach.” Front Biosci 13 (2008): 5794-5809.
Shiki, Yasuhiko, et al. “Changes of lipocalin—type prostaglandin D synthase level during pregnancy.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 30.1 (2004): 65-70, XP002903436, ISSN: 1341-S076, 001: 10.1111/J.1341-S076.2004.0015S.X.
Phillips, R. J., et al. “Genes for prostaglandin synthesis, transport and inactivation are differentially expressed in human uterine tissues, and the prostaglandin F synthase AKR1B1 is induced in myometrial cells by inflammatory cytokines.” Molecular human reproduction 17.1 (2011): 1-13.
Warner, Timothy D., and Jane A. Mitchell. “Cyclooxygenases: new forms, new inhibitors, and lessons from the clinic.” The FASEB Journal 18.7 (2004): 790-804.
Pirianov, Grisha, et al. “Endocrinology. First published ahead of print Oct. 9, 2008 as doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1178.” (2008).
Fortier, M. A., K. Krishnaswamy, G. Danyod, S. Boucher-Kovalik, and P. Chapdalaine. “A postgenomic integrated view of prostaglandins in reproduction: implications for other body systems.” J Physiol Pharmacol 59, No. Suppl 1 (2008): 65-89.
Marceau, Geoffroy, Jean-Marc Lobaccaro, Loïc Blanchon, and Vincent Sapin. Role of nuclear receptors Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) and Liver X receptors (LXRs) in the human placental pathophysiology. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2012.
Pinhal-Enfield, Grace, Nagaswami S. Vasan, and Samuel Joseph Leibovich. The Role of Macrophages in the Placenta. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2012.
Dwivedi, Chandraprakash, Kunal Chandrakar, Sandip Prasad Tiwari, Trilochan Satapathy, and Amit Roy. “Systematic review of the role of prostaglandins.” World J Pharm Pharm Sci 3, No. 2 (2013): 2249-69.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2013/066490 dated Jan. 14, 2014.
International Search Report dated Jan. 14, 2014 issued in corresponding International patent application No. PCT/US2013/066490.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180003713 A1 Jan 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61717724 Oct 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14438110 US
Child 15708582 US