The field of this invention is whipstocks for creating laterals from wellbores and more particularly to whipstocks that are substantially non-metallic.
Frequently in the life of a well additional laterals are needed to properly and more fully produce a formation. Whipstocks are properly positioned in the wellbore and oriented so that the lateral will exit in the proper direction into the target formation. Whipstocks are typically anchored from below and feature a ramp surface in the range of about 3 degrees. As a result the whipstock body is generally fairly long and features a lug near its upper end to allow a window mill to be delivered with it. After proper orientation and anchoring, the window mill is started and it breaks loose from its mounting lug and begins to make the exit or window in the surrounding tubular.
The whipstocks are typically milled from a metal cylinder stock in a process that takes a great deal of time to mill away a ramp that can be over 15 feet long. The resulting rigidity of the whipstock also makes it difficult to manipulate it in deviated wellbores and risks breaking the connection between the window mill and the lug when running in.
Whipstocks have always been made this way. The present invention is a departure from this tradition in that it results in a streamlined manufacturing process that is easier to run in and yet comparably performs to the traditional totally metallic designs. Examples of the whipstocks now in use are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,766,859; 6,497,288; 6,419,024; 6,419,023; 6,419,021; 6,419,012; 6,419,010; 6,386,287; 5,725,060; 5,507,346; 5,499,680; 5,467,820; 5,277,251; 5,199,513 and US Publication Number 2002/0029889. The last reference shows the use of a polymeric coating on the whipstock to protect its metal body and to ease the advancement of a washover tool over the top of the whipstock if it needs to be retrieved.
Apart from the prior art mentioned above, an older technique presents an alternative to milling a whipstock from a metal cylinder.
The present invention will be more readily understood by those skilled in the art from the discussion of the preferred embodiment and the related drawings and from the claims that define the scope of the invention.
A whipstock that is totally to substantially non-metallic is made preferably from a composite material. The body can include one or more stiffeners that are also preferably non-metallic. The mounting lug for the window mill can also be non-metallic. A metallic base can be used to connect to an anchor. The ramp can include a plate that is optionally internally supported. Alternatively the ramp can include hardened inserts or other wear resistant material. Composite materials that can be molded are preferred.
a-b shows a variation of the whipstock shown in
Preferably the whipstock of the present invention can be a composite material that can be injection molded or fabricated from a blank. It can be at least 80% composite or other durable non-metallic substance that is somewhat flexible and not brittle. It can have fiber reinforcement. If desired, the whipstock can be up to fully non-metallic. Making the whipstock this way cuts down on the manufacturing time and reduces cost. Metallic whipstocks require milling away a lot of steel to produce the ramp. Another advantage of the non-metallic whipstock is if it has to be milled out. In that case the procedure is so much quicker. In negotiating well deviations the non-metallic whipstock will run in faster and will be less likely to get stuck. The resulting rigidity can be very comparable to the steel whipstocks while providing the needed column strength with stiffeners and still retaining some degree of flexibility for running in to deviated bores.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that “non-metallic” is intended to refer to the degree of use of other materials and can encompass a 100% composite design, for example, as well as including as design that may be 80% composite and the rest metallic as illustrated by using the bottom sub 46 or the slide 54 in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
This application is a divisional application claiming priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/403,107, filed on Apr. 12, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2331293 | Ballard | Oct 1943 | A |
4182423 | Ziebarth et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
5199513 | Stewart et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5277251 | Blount et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5398754 | Dinhoble | Mar 1995 | A |
5467820 | Sieber | Nov 1995 | A |
5494111 | Davis et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499680 | Walter et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507346 | Gano et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5544704 | Laurel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566757 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5725060 | Blount et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5909770 | Davis | Jun 1999 | A |
6386287 | George | May 2002 | B2 |
6419010 | Begg | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419012 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419021 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419023 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419024 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6497288 | George et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6766859 | Haugen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
20020029889 | George et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20060027359 | Carter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0701040 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0733775 | Sep 1996 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090301706 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11403107 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12543310 | US |