The subject invention relates to a permeable membrane system utilized for the separation of fluid components, specifically spiral-wound permeable membrane elements.
Spiral-wound membrane filtration elements known in the art comprise a laminated structure including a membrane sheet sealed to or around a porous permeate carrier which creates a path for removal of the fluid passing through the membrane to a central tube, while this laminated structure is wrapped spirally around the central tube and spaced from itself with a porous feed spacer to allow axial flow of the fluid through the element. While this feed spacer is necessary to maintain open and uniform axial flow between the laminated structure, it is also a source of flow restriction and pressure drop within the axial flow channel and also presents areas of restriction of flow and contact to the membrane that contribute significantly to membrane fouling via biological growth, scale formation, and particle capture.
Improvements to the design of spiral wound elements have been disclosed by Barger et al. and Bradford et al., which replace the feed spacer with islands or protrusions either deposited or embossed directly onto the outside or active surface of the membrane. This configuration is advantageous in that it maintains spacing for axial flow through the element while minimizing obstruction within the flow channel. It also eliminates the porous feed spacer as a separate component, thus simplifying element manufacture. Patent publication number US2016-0008763-A1, entitled “Improved Spiral Wound Element Construction” teaches the application of printed patterns on the back side of the active surface of the membrane sheet, or directly on the surface of the permeate carrier.
The following references, each of which is incorporated herein by reference, can facilitate understanding of the invention: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,962,096; 4,476,022; 4,756,835; 4,834,881; 4,855,058; 4,902,417; 4,861,487; 6,632,357; and U.S. application No. 2016-0008763A1.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a membrane for use in a spiral wound permeable membrane system, comprising a membrane having spacing features disposed on a surface of the membrane, wherein the spacing features are configured such that they discourage nesting of the spacers when spirally wound. The spacing features can be disposed such that they overlap when the membrane is spirally wound.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can comprise a plurality of substantially parallel line segments spaced apart from each other by nonuniform spacing distances. A first subset of the plurality of line segments can be spaced apart from each other by nonuniform spacing distances thereby forming a pattern, and wherein other subsets of the plurality of line segments comprise repeats of the pattern. The first subset can extend over at least 6 inches measured from the first line segment to the last line segment. The first subset can extend over at least 12 inches measured from the first line segment to the last line segment. The variation in spacing can be less than 15% of the average distance between adjacent spacing features.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can comprise a plurality of line segments spaced apart from each other and oriented non-parallel to each other at nonuniform angles. A first subset of the plurality of line segments can be oriented relative to each other at nonuniform angles thereby forming a pattern, and wherein other subsets of the plurality of line segments comprise repeats of the pattern. The pattern can extend for at least 6 inches measured from the first line segment to the last line segment. The pattern can extend for at least 12 inches measured from the first line segment to the last line segment. The variation in angle can be less than 15% of the average angle of the features relative to the pattern.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can comprise a first plurality of line segments parallel to each other and disposed in a first grid on the surface, and a second plurality of line segments parallel to each other and disposed in a second grid on the surface, wherein the line segments in the first plurality do not intersect the line segments in the second plurality, and wherein the line segments in the first plurality are disposed at an angle other than zero degrees to the line segments in the second plurality. The angle can be at least 1 degree but not more than 45 degrees. The angle can be 45 degrees. Each spacing feature in the first plurality can be separated from adjacent spacing features in the first plurality by no more than one quarter of an inch. Each spacing feature in the first plurality can be separated from adjacent spacing features in the first plurality by no more than one tenth of an inch.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can comprise a plurality of curved segments that are spaced apart from each other by nonuniform spacing distances measured as determined along at least one path traversing the spacing features.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be configured such that the spacing features at least partly support those spacing features on adjacent layers as the membrane is manufactured into the permeable membrane system.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be disposed proximal the edges of the membrane.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be disposed on the entirety of the surface of the membrane.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be more closely spaced near the edges of the membrane than in portions of the membrane distant from the edges. The edges of the membrane can be defined as the region within three inches of the edge of the membrane. The edges of the membrane can be defined as the region within one inch of the edge of the membrane.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be made of one or more of thermoplastics, reactive polymers, waxes, or resins; deposited directly onto the membrane surface.
In some embodiments, the spacing features can be made of one or more of high-temperature thermoplastics, metals, or ceramics; formed apart from the membrane surface and then adhered to the membrane surface.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a permeable membrane system comprising a membrane as described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a water treatment facility comprising one or more permeable membrane systems as described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method of treating water, comprising providing a permeable membrane system as described herein, and passing water to be treated through the permeable membrane system.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method of making a permeable membrane system, comprising providing a membrane as described herein, and spirally winding the membrane.
Embossing or depositing features onto the surface of the membrane sheet, or onto or into the permeate carrier sheet of a spiral-wound element to provide spacing between adjacent membrane sheets can provide several advantages as compared to feed spacer mesh, including more open flow channels, lower pressure drop, reduced fouling, and the ability to produce thinner feed space than would be practical using a mesh. The membrane sheet itself can be made with a porous layer of polypropylene, bonded to a porous layer of polysulfone, with the membrane polymer material cast onto the polysulfone layer. Various other materials and methods can be used to make the membrane sheet. Membrane sheet can be made that provides varying degrees of removal efficiency. Micro filtration membranes can typically remove material as small as about 0.1 micron, typical of bacteria and protozoa, or other contaminants of such size in industrial applications. Ultra filtration membranes can have pore sizes as small as about 0.01 micron and can remove, as an example, viruses from fluid sources. Nano filtration membranes can have pore sizes small enough to remove di-valent ions, but will pass monovalent ions such as sodium and chloride. An example of application of nano filtration is water softening to remove, as an example, calcium carbonate. Reverse osmosis is typically the smallest pore size, and is sufficient to remove mono-valent salts, typically used in desalination applications. Various configurations of these spacer features have been disclosed by Barger et al. and Bradford et al. PCT/US14/18813, incorporated herein by reference, discloses various methods and materials suitable for depositing spacing features on membrane sheets. Those methods and materials can be useful in implementing embodiments of the present invention.
Spacer features that are embossed or deposited directly on the membrane surface present differences during manufacture of spiral wound elements as compared to conventional mesh feed spacers. Spacer features can be made with a wider variety of shapes and patterns than can be achieved with an extruded or woven mesh material, and their spacing and orientation can likewise be widely varied. During the typical manufacture of a spiral wound filtration element using embossed or deposited features, sheets of membrane with features on one-half of the sheet are folded into leaves, one side containing features and the other side blank; both faces—now opposed to each other—are active membrane surface. The spacers allow a feed solution to flow between the active membrane surfaces so that all active surfaces of the membrane are available for filtration. Interleaved on the outside of these two membrane sheets are sheets of permeate carrier. Fluids flowing through the active membrane sheet come in contact with the permeate carrier and the fluid in the permeate carrier is transported to the center tube. Adhesive is applied before being rolled around the center tube to create the finished element. A line of adhesive is deposited starting at one end of the center tube either onto the back (inactive) side of the folded membrane leaf or onto the permeate carrier mesh above said leaf, around three sides of the perimeter of this sheet and back into contact with the center tube. The glue line serves to seal and isolate the permeate carrier from the feed/reject flow. This process is repeated on each leaf used to create the element.
The printed features are particularly important at the inlet and outlet areas of a spiral-wound element, where the area between the features creates spacing through which feed water flows into and reject water flows out of the element, and where they must resist the forces generated by the compression of the viscous adhesive line during element rolling. If the printed features are merely a regularly spaced repeating pattern of lines, line segments, or posts, they may allow the adjacent membrane sheet to deform into the feed space during rolling due to force on the adhesive and occlude the flow channel. Similarly, some patterns and spacing of features can allow for the entire adjacent layer of membrane, permeate carrier and adhesive to deform to nest between features.
Example embodiments of the present invention can prevent occlusion of the feed channel during spiral wound element manufacture by providing feature spacing and patterns that prevent collapse and deformation of the membrane film and adjacent layers. Additionally, by providing additional support to the membrane sheet during rolling and preventing nesting, example embodiments of the present invention can discourage occlusion of the feed channel without requiring changes to the standard processes used to roll spiral wound elements.
An advantage of embodiments of the present invention is that reducing occlusion of the feed space between layers of a spiral wound element reduces resistance to flow and thus pressure drop from the inlet to the outlet of the element, which improves the efficiency of filtration and reduces energy requirements.
Example embodiments of the present invention can also provide advantages by facilitating more uniform flow throughout the element and preventing potential fouling due to non-uniform flow. If some segments of the feed space are unevenly occluded, as can be caused by nesting of adjacent layers between conventional features, uneven flow can occur within the element. Uneven flow is known to create stagnation points that allow for biological fouling and scale deposition.
Referring to
Referring to
Similarly, variation of features or relative angles can be practiced on other shapes such as curves, or zigzag patterned features can be arrayed with periodic varying angles in order to prevent nesting of consecutive layers as well. Examples of such variations are illustrated in
Spiral wound elements using conventional extruded mesh spacers generally do not have issues with nesting of adjacent layers because the mesh filaments are spaced so closely that the filaments do not allow the membrane film or the entire layer of membrane, permeate carrier, and adhesive to deform and occlude the feed space. Typically, the largest mesh spacing is eight strands per inch, with ten to twelve strands per inch more common for large elements and more dense spacing for smaller elements. Consequently, the concern addressed by the current invention was not apparent until unconventional, deposited spacing features were deployed.
Referring to
In each of the example embodiments, the features can be embossed or deposited in a continuous manner across the entirety of the printed surface of the membrane leaf; embossed or deposited only along the inlet and outlet edge sections of the membrane, for example at a width of one to three inches, in order to support the area where adhesive is applied; or embossed or deposited only along the inlet and outlet edge sections and end section of the membrane, for example at a width of one to three inches, in order to support the area where adhesive is applied in all areas.
The features can comprise various materials that are compatible with the separated fluid and the permeate carrier including, but not limited to, thermoplastics, reactive polymers, waxes, or resins. Additionally, materials that are compatible with the separated fluid but not compatible with direct deposition to the permeate carrier, including, but not limited to high-temperature thermoplastics, metals, or ceramics, can be pre-formed, cast, or cut to the proper dimensions and adhered to the surface of the permeate carrier with an adhesive that is compatible with the permeate carrier.
The present invention has been described in connection with various example embodiments. It will be understood that the above description is merely illustrative of the applications of the principles of the present invention, the scope of which is to be determined by the claims viewed in light of the specification. Other variants and modifications of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3963621 | Newman | Jun 1976 | A |
4187173 | Keefer | Feb 1980 | A |
4208289 | Bray | Jun 1980 | A |
4222874 | Connelly | Sep 1980 | A |
4228014 | Timm et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4230564 | Keefer | Oct 1980 | A |
4230579 | Bray et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4235723 | Bartlett, Jr. | Nov 1980 | A |
4277340 | Kanamaru et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4288326 | Keefer | Sep 1981 | A |
4309287 | Roos et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4326960 | Iwahori et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4341631 | Hargitay | Jul 1982 | A |
4347132 | Davis | Aug 1982 | A |
4354939 | Pohl | Oct 1982 | A |
4358377 | Clark | Nov 1982 | A |
4409849 | Roos | Oct 1983 | A |
4410429 | Harvey et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4411785 | Yu et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4426285 | Davis | Jan 1984 | A |
4434056 | Keefer | Feb 1984 | A |
4454891 | Dreibelbis et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4461707 | Thayer et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4476022 | Doll | Oct 1984 | A |
4482459 | Shiver | Nov 1984 | A |
4534713 | Wanner | Aug 1985 | A |
4556488 | Timm et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4585554 | Burrows | Apr 1986 | A |
RE32144 | Keefer | May 1986 | E |
4595497 | Burrows | Jun 1986 | A |
4599171 | Padilla et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4600512 | Aid | Jul 1986 | A |
4608140 | Goldstein | Aug 1986 | A |
4613436 | Wight et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623451 | Oliver | Nov 1986 | A |
4623467 | Hamlin | Nov 1986 | A |
4640774 | Garcera et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645601 | Regunathan et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652373 | Trimmer | Mar 1987 | A |
4657674 | Burrows | Apr 1987 | A |
4670144 | McCausland et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4695375 | Tyler | Sep 1987 | A |
4704324 | Davis et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4705625 | Hart, Jr. | Nov 1987 | A |
4735716 | Petrucci et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4735718 | Peters | Apr 1988 | A |
4741823 | Olsen et al. | May 1988 | A |
4743366 | Burrows | May 1988 | A |
4744895 | Gales et al. | May 1988 | A |
4744900 | Bratt | May 1988 | A |
4756835 | Wilson | Jul 1988 | A |
4775465 | Burrows | Oct 1988 | A |
4781831 | Goldsmith | Nov 1988 | A |
4784771 | Wathen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4802982 | Lien | Feb 1989 | A |
4814079 | Schneider | Mar 1989 | A |
4820413 | Lopez | Apr 1989 | A |
4830744 | Burrows | May 1989 | A |
4832850 | Cais et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834873 | Burrows | May 1989 | A |
4834881 | Sawada | May 1989 | A |
4842725 | Blad et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842736 | Bray | Jun 1989 | A |
4844805 | Solomon | Jul 1989 | A |
4855058 | Holland et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4856559 | Lipshultz et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869821 | Korin | Sep 1989 | A |
4874514 | Casey, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876002 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877521 | Petrucci et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4882061 | Petrucci et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4882223 | Aptel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
RE33135 | Wanner, Sr. et al. | Dec 1989 | E |
4885092 | Zwick | Dec 1989 | A |
4886597 | Wild et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892657 | Mohn et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4902417 | Lien | Feb 1990 | A |
4906372 | Hopkins | Mar 1990 | A |
4917847 | Solomon | Apr 1990 | A |
4937557 | Tucci et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944877 | Maples | Jul 1990 | A |
4988525 | Gresch | Jan 1991 | A |
4990248 | Brown et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4992170 | Menon et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4995977 | Hilgendorff et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002664 | Clack et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5017284 | Miler et al. | May 1991 | A |
5043066 | Miller et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5045197 | Burrows | Sep 1991 | A |
5057212 | Burrows | Oct 1991 | A |
5069789 | Mohn et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078876 | Whittier et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094749 | Seita et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5096574 | Birdsong et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104532 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108604 | Robbins | Apr 1992 | A |
5128035 | Clack et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131277 | Birdsong et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132017 | Birdsong et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5145575 | Burrows | Sep 1992 | A |
5167786 | Eberle | Dec 1992 | A |
5167826 | Eaton | Dec 1992 | A |
5183567 | Mohn et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5194156 | Tomchak | Mar 1993 | A |
5198110 | Hanai et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204002 | Belfort et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5232591 | Solomon | Aug 1993 | A |
5234583 | Cluff | Aug 1993 | A |
5240612 | Grangeon et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279732 | Edens | Jan 1994 | A |
5296148 | Colangelo et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5354464 | Slovak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362383 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5462414 | Permar | Oct 1995 | A |
5466366 | Chia-ching | Nov 1995 | A |
5468387 | Solomon | Nov 1995 | A |
5507943 | Labrador | Apr 1996 | A |
RE35252 | Clack et al. | May 1996 | E |
5545320 | Heine et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573662 | Abe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5597487 | Vogel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626752 | Mohn et al. | May 1997 | A |
5626758 | Belfort | May 1997 | A |
5628198 | Permar | May 1997 | A |
5681459 | Bowman | Oct 1997 | A |
5681467 | Solie et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5788858 | Acernese et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795475 | Luedke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811251 | Hirose et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824217 | Pearl et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5914041 | Chancellor | Jun 1999 | A |
5944985 | Bowman | Aug 1999 | A |
5985146 | Knappe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6030535 | Hayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071404 | Tsui | Jun 2000 | A |
6071414 | Kishi | Jun 2000 | A |
6099735 | Kelada | Aug 2000 | A |
6109029 | Vowles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110360 | Hart, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117297 | Goldstein | Sep 2000 | A |
6120682 | Cook | Sep 2000 | A |
6126833 | Stobbe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174437 | Haney | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190557 | Hisada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193879 | Bowman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197191 | Wobben | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217773 | Graham | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258270 | Hilgendorff et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277282 | Kihara et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299766 | Permar | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345961 | Oklejas, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348148 | Bosley | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379518 | Osawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379548 | Kurokawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383384 | Anderson | May 2002 | B1 |
RE37759 | Belfort | Jun 2002 | E |
6402956 | Andou et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423212 | Bosko | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423223 | Northcut et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432301 | Dengler | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436282 | Gundrum et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447259 | Elliott-Moore | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6514398 | DiMascio et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521124 | Northcut et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521127 | Chancellor | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524478 | Heine et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540915 | Patil | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575308 | Fuls et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579451 | Avero | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607668 | Rela | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613231 | Jitariouk | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632357 | Barger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6790345 | Broussard | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805796 | Hirose et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830683 | Gundrum et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866831 | Nakao et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6929743 | Diel | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929748 | Avijit et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7021667 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7186331 | Maartens et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7244357 | Herrington et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7297268 | Herrington et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306437 | Hauge | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311831 | Bradford et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7351335 | Broens et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387725 | Choi et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416666 | Gordon | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7449093 | Dudziak et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455778 | Gordon | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501064 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514010 | Salmon | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520981 | Barber | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7540956 | Kurth et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7650805 | Nauseda et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7733459 | Dierichs et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736503 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7862723 | Cartwright | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875184 | Parker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7892429 | Oklejas, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901580 | Salyer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909998 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910004 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7927082 | Haudenschild | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7981293 | Powell | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021550 | Beauchamp et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8101074 | Larsen | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114286 | Kawakami | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147699 | Goldsmith | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8257594 | Astle et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282823 | Acernese et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292088 | Francisco et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292492 | Ho et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8414767 | Gaignet et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425734 | Goel et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454829 | Yaeger | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8506685 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518225 | Sumita et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8628642 | Goel et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652326 | Johann et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8685252 | Vuong et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696904 | Thiyagarajan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8771510 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778055 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8808538 | Oklejas, Jr. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8889009 | Brausch et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8944257 | Eisen et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961790 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968566 | Beauchamp et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8999162 | Vuong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011664 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011688 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9108162 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9114365 | Schmitt | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9260325 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9328743 | Hirosawa et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387445 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9403125 | Shaffer | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9475008 | Salama et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9492792 | Tomescu et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9546671 | Hirosawa et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9597640 | Koiwa et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9616390 | Hirozawa et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9617172 | Baski | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9724646 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9731984 | Beall | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9758389 | Rau, III | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9764291 | Hirozawa et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9808767 | Tabayashi et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20080290031 | Popa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110036774 | McGinnis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120103892 | Beauchamp et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130334128 | Takagi et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20160008763 | Roderick et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160059188 | Liberman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160236132 | Hara et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2662925 | Jan 2009 | CA |
2825674 | Aug 2011 | CA |
2902094 | Aug 2015 | EP |
H06 262026 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2009 195871 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2016 137462 | Aug 2016 | JP |
WO2010047360 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2015016253 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO2002055179 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO2016199272 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO2017087461 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Schwinge et al., “Spiral Wound Modules and Spacers”, 2004, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 242, No. 1-2. |
Evangelista et al., “Optimal Design and Performance of Spiral Wound Modules”, 1988, Chem. Eng. Comm., vol. 72, pp. 66-81. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210339202 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62487970 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16074057 | US | |
Child | 17368625 | US |