NON-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME

Abstract
Iron loss is reduced by increasing magnetic flux density. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet has a chemical composition containing, by mass %, C: 0.0050% or less, Si: 1.50% or more and 4.00% or less, Al: 0.500% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 5.00% or less, S: 0.0200% or less, P: 0.200% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, and O: 0.0200% or less, with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, in which the steel sheet has an Ar3 transformation temperature of 700° C. or higher, a grain size of 80 μm or more and 200 μm or less, a Vickers hardness of 140 HV or more and 230 HV or less.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a non-oriented electrical steel sheet and a method of producing the same.


BACKGROUND

Recently, high efficiency induction motors are being used to meet increasing energy saving needs in factories. To improve efficiency of such motors, attempts are being made to increase a thickness of an iron core lamination and improve the winding filling factor thereof. Further attempts are being made to replace a conventional low grade material with a higher grade material having low iron loss properties as an electrical steel sheet used for iron cores.


Additionally, from the viewpoint of reducing copper loss, such core materials for induction motors are required to have low iron loss properties and to lower the exciting effective current at the designed magnetic flux density. In order to reduce the exciting effective current, it is effective to increase the magnetic flux density of the core material.


Further, in the case of drive motors of hybrid electric vehicles, which have been rapidly spreading recently, high torque is required at the time of starting and accelerating, and thus further improvement of magnetic flux density is desired.


As an electrical steel sheet having a high magnetic flux density, for example, JP2000129410A (PTL 1) describes a non-oriented electrical steel sheet made of a steel to which Si is added at 4% or less and Co at 0.1% or more and 5% or less. However, since Co is very expensive, leading to the problem of a significant increase in cost when applied to a general motor.


To improve the magnetic flux density of an electrical steel sheet, it is effective to reduce the grain size before performing cold rolling. For example, JP2006291346A (PTL 2) describes a technique for increasing the magnetic flux density by subjecting a steel containing Si of 1.5% or more and 3.5% or less to high-temperature hot band annealing so as to provide a grain size of 300 μm or more before performing cold rolling. However, performing hot band annealing at high temperature leads to the problems of increased costs and an increased grain size before cold rolling, making sheet fracture more likely to occur during cold rolling.


On the other hand, use of a material with a low Si content makes it possible to increase the magnetic flux density without performing hot band annealing, yet such a material is soft, and experiences a significant increase in iron loss when punched into a motor core material.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

PTL 1: JP2000129410A


PTL 2: JP2006291346A


SUMMARY
Technical Problem

Under these circumstances, there is a demand for a technique for increasing the magnetic flux density of an electrical steel sheet and reducing the iron loss without causing a significant increase in cost.


It would thus be helpful to provide a non-oriented electrical steel sheet with an increased magnetic flux density and reduced iron loss, and a method of producing the same.


Solution to Problem

We conducted intensive studies on the solution of the above-mentioned issues, and as a result, found that by formulating a chemical composition with which a γ→α transformation (transformation from γ phase to α phase) is caused to occur during hot rolling and by adjusting the Vickers hardness within a range of 140 HV to 230 HV, it is possible to provide materials achieving a good balance between the magnetic flux density and iron loss properties without performing hot band annealing.


The present disclosure was completed based on these findings, and the primary features thereof are as described below.


1. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet comprising: a chemical composition containing (consisting of), by mass %, C: 0.0050% or less, Si: 1.50% or more and 4.00% or less, Al: 0.500% or less, Mn: 0.10% or more and 5.00% or less, S: 0.0200% or less, P: 0.200% or less, N: 0.0050% or less, and O: 0.0200% or less, with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein the non-oriented electrical steel sheet has an Ar3 transformation temperature of 700° C. or higher, a grain size of 80 μm or more and 200 μm or less, and a Vickers hardness of 140 HV or more and 230 HV or less.


2. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to 1., wherein the chemical composition further contains, by mass %, Ge: 0.0500% or less.


3. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to 1. or 2., wherein the chemical composition further contains, by mass %, at least one of Ti: 0.0030% or less, Nb: 0.0030% or less, V: 0.0030% or less, or Zr: 0.0020% or less.


4. A method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of 1. to 3., the method comprising performing hot rolling in at least one pass or more in a dual phase region from γ-phase to α-phase.


Advantageous Effect

According to the disclosure, it is possible to obtain an electrical steel sheet with high magnetic flux density and low iron loss without performing hot band annealing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

In the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a caulking ring sample; and



FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the influence of Ar3 transformation temperature on magnetic flux density B50.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The reasons for the limitations of the disclosure are described below. Firstly, in order to investigate the influence of the dual-phase region on the magnetic properties, Steel A to Steel C having the chemical compositions listed in Table 1 were prepared by steelmaking in a laboratory and hot rolled. The hot rolling was performed in 7 passes, where the entry temperature in the first pass (F1) was adjusted to 1030° C. and the entry temperature in the final pass (F7) to 910° C.











TABLE 1









Chemical composition (mass %)




















Steel
C
Si
Al
Mn
P
S
N
O
Ge
Ti
V
Zr
Nb





A
0.0015
1.40
0.500
0.20
0.010
0.0005
0.0020
0.0020
0.0001
0.0010
0.0010
0.0005
0.0005


B
0.0016
1.30
0.300
0.30
0.010
0.0007
0.0022
0.0018
0.0001
0.0010
0.0010
0.0005
0.0005


C
0.0016
1.70
0.001
0.30
0.010
0.0007
0.0022
0.0055
0.0001
0.0010
0.0010
0.0005
0.0005









After being pickled, each hot rolled sheet was cold rolled to a sheet thickness of 0.5 mm, and final annealed at 950° C. for 10 seconds in a 20% H2-80% N2 atmosphere.


From each final annealed sheet thus obtained, a ring sample 1 having an outer diameter of 55 mm and an inner diameter of 35 mm was prepared by punching, V caulking 2 was applied at six equally spaced positions of the ring sample 1 as illustrated in FIG. 1, and 10 ring samples 1 were stacked and fixed together into a stacked structure. Magnetic property measurement was performed using the stacked structure with windings of the first 100 turns and the second 100 turns, and the measurement results were evaluated using a wattmeter. The Vickers hardness was measured in accordance with JIS Z2244 by pushing a 500 g diamond indenter into a cross section of each steel sheet. After polishing the cross section and etching with nital, measurement was made of the grain size in accordance with JIS G 0551.


Table 2 lists the magnetic properties of Steel A to Steel C in Table 1. Focusing attention on the magnetic flux density, it is understood that the magnetic flux density is low in Steel A and high in Steels B and C. In order to identify the cause, we investigated the texture of the material after final annealing, and it was revealed that the (111) texture which is disadvantageous to the magnetic properties was developed in Steel A as compared with Steels B and C. It is known that the microstructure of the electrical steel sheet before cold rolling has a large influence on the texture formation in the electrical steel sheet, and investigation was made on the microstructure after hot rolling, and it was found that Steel A had a non-recrystallized microstructure. For this reason, it is considered that in Steel A, a (111) texture was developed during the cold rolling and final annealing process after hot rolling.













TABLE 2






Magnetic flux
Iron loss

Grain


Steel
density B50 (T)
W15/50 (W/kg)
HV
size (μm)







A
1.65
3.60
145
121


B
1.70
4.20
135
120


C
1.70
3.50
150
122









We also observed the microstructures of Steels B and C after subjection to the hot rolling, and found that the microstructures were completely recrystallized. It is thus considered that in Steels B and C, formation of a (111) texture disadvantageous to the magnetic properties was suppressed and the magnetic flux density increased.


As described above, in order to identify the cause of varying microstructures after hot rolling among different steels, transformation behavior during hot rolling was evaluated by linear expansion coefficient measurement. As a result, it was revealed that Steel A has a single-phase from the high temperature range to the low temperature range, and that no phase transformation occurred during hot rolling. On the other hand, it was revealed that the Ar3 transformation temperature was 1020° C. for Steel B and 950° C. for Steel C, and that γ→α transformation occurred in the first pass in Steel B and in the third to fifth passes in Steel C. It is considered that the occurrence of γ→α transformation during hot rolling caused the recrystallization to proceed with the transformation strain as the driving force.


From the above, it is important to have γ→α transformation in the temperature range where hot rolling is performed. Therefore, the following experiment was conducted to identify the Ar3 transformation temperature at which γ→α transformation should be completed. Specifically, steels, each containing C: 0.0017%, Al: 0.001%, P: 0.010%, S: 0.0007%, N: 0.0022%, 0: 0.0050% to 0.0070%, Ge: 0.0001%, Ti: 0.0010%, V: 0.0010%, Zr: 0.0005%, and Nb: 0.0005% as basic components, and respectively having different Si and Mn contents for different Ar3 transformation temperatures, were prepared by steelmaking in a laboratory and formed into slabs. The slabs thus obtained were subjected to hot rolling. The hot rolling was performed in 7 passes, where the entry temperature in the first pass (F1) was adjusted to 900° C. and the entry temperature in the final pass (F7) to 780° C., such that at least one pass of the hot rolling was performed in a dual phase region from α-phase to γ-phase.


After being pickled, each hot rolled sheet was cold rolled to a sheet thickness of 0.5 mm and subjected to final annealing at 950° C. for 10 seconds in a 20% H2-80% N2 atmosphere.


From each final annealed sheet thus obtained, a ring sample 1 having an outer diameter of 55 mm and an inner diameter of 35 mm was prepared by punching, V caulking 2 was applied at six equally spaced positions of the ring sample 1 as illustrated in FIG. 1, and 10 ring samples 1 were stacked and fixed together. Magnetic property measurement was performed using the stacked structure with windings of the first 100 turns and the second 100 turns, and the measurement results were evaluated using a wattmeter.



FIG. 2 illustrates the influence of the Ar3 transformation temperature on the magnetic flux density B50. It can be seen that when the Ar3 transformation temperature is 700° C. or lower, the magnetic flux density B50 decreases. Although the reason is not clear, it is considered to be that when the Ar3 transformation temperature was 700° C. or lower, the grain size before cold rolling was so small that caused a (111) texture disadvantageous to the magnetic properties to be developed in the process from the subsequent cold rolling to final annealing.


From the above, the Ar3 transformation temperature is set to 700° C. or higher. No upper limit is placed on the Ar3 transformation temperature. However, it is important that γ→α transformation is caused to occur during hot rolling, and at least one pass of the hot rolling needs to be performed in a dual phase region of γ-phase and α-phase. In view of this, it is preferable that the Ar3 transformation temperature is set to 1000° C. or lower. This is because performing hot rolling during transformation promotes development of a texture which is preferable for the magnetic properties.


Focusing on the evaluation of iron loss in Table 2 above, it can be seen that iron loss is low in Steels A and C and high in Steel B. Although the cause is not clear, it is considered to be that since the hardness (HV) of the steel sheet after final annealing was low in Steel B, a compressive stress field generated by punching and caulking was spread easily and iron loss increased. Therefore, the Vickers hardness is set to 140 HV or more, and preferably 150 HV or more. On the other hand, a Vickers hardness above 230 HV wears the mold more severely, which unnecessarily increases the cost. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 230 HV.


The following describes a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to one of the disclosed embodiments. Firstly, the reasons for limitations on the chemical composition of steel will be explained. When components are expressed in “%”, this refers to “mass %” unless otherwise specified.


C: 0.0050% or less


C content is set to 0.0050% or less from the viewpoint of preventing magnetic aging. On the other hand, since C has an effect of improving the magnetic flux density, the C content is preferably 0.0010% or more.


Si: 1.50% or more and 4.00% or less


Si is a useful element for increasing the specific resistance of a steel sheet. Thus, the Si content is preferably set to 1.50% or more. On the other hand, Si content exceeding 4.00% results in a decrease in saturation magnetic flux density and an associated decrease in magnetic flux density. Thus, the upper limit for the Si content is set to 4.00%. The Si content is preferably 3.00% or less. This is because, if the Si content exceeds 3.00%, it is necessary to add a large amount of Mn in order to obtain a dual phase region, which unnecessarily increases the cost.


Al: 0.500% or less


Al is a γ-region closed type element, and a lower Al content is preferable. The Al content is set to 0.500% or less, preferably 0.020% or less, and more preferably 0.002% or less.


Mn: 0.10% or more and 5.00% or less


Since Mn is an effective element for enlarging the γ region, the lower limit for the Mn content is set to 0.10%. On the other hand, Mn content exceeding 5.00% results in a decrease in magnetic flux density. Thus, the upper limit for the Mn content is set to 5.00%. The Mn content is preferably 3.00% or less. The reason is that Mn content exceeding 3.00% unnecessarily increases the cost.


S: 0.0200% or less


S causes an increase in iron loss due to precipitation of MnS if added beyond 0.0200%. Thus, the upper limit for the S content is set to 0.0200%.


P: 0.200% or less


P increases the hardness of the steel sheet if added beyond 0.200%. Thus, the P content is set to 0.200% or less, and more preferably 0.100% or less. Further preferably, the P content is set within a range of 0.010% to 0.050%. This is because P has the effect of suppressing nitridation by surface segregation.


N: 0.0050% or less


N causes more MN precipitation and increases iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the N content is set to 0.0050% or less.


O: 0.0200% or less


O causes more oxides and increases iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the O content is set to 0.0200% or less.


The basic components of the steel sheet according to the disclosure have been described. The balance other than the above components consist of Fe and inevitable impurities. However, the following optional elements may also be added as appropriate.


Ge: 0.0500% or less


Ge is an element that is easily incorporated in scraps because it is used for semiconductors. However, if the Ge content exceeds 0.0500%, recrystallization after hot rolling is suppressed and the magnetic flux density may be lowered. Thus, the upper limit for the Ge content is set to 0.0500%.


Ti: 0.0030% or less


Ti causes more TiN precipitation and may increase iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the Ti content is set to 0.0030% or less.


Nb: 0.0030% or less


Nb causes more NbC precipitation and may increase iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the Nb content is set to 0.0030% or less.


V: 0.0030% or less


V causes more VN and VC precipitation and may increase iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the V content is set to 0.0030% or less.


Zr: 0.0020% or less


Zr causes more ZrN precipitation and may increase iron loss if added in a large amount. Thus, the Zr content is set to 0.0020% or less.


The average grain size is 80 μm or more and 200 μm or less. When the average grain size is less than 80 μm, the Vickers hardness can be adjusted to 140 HV or more even with a low-Si material. If the grain size is small, however, the iron loss would increase. Therefore, the grain size is set to 80 μm or more. On the other hand, when the grain size exceeds 200 μm, plastic deformation due to punching and caulking increases, resulting in increased iron loss. Therefore, the upper limit for the grain size is set to 200 μm. To obtain a grain size of 80 μm or more and 200 μm or less, it is necessary to appropriately control the final annealing temperature. In addition, to provide a Vickers hardness of 140 HV or more and 230 HV or less, it is necessary to appropriately add a solid-solution-strengthening element such as Si, Mn, or P.


The following provides a specific description of the conditions for producing non-oriented electrical steel sheets according to the disclosure.


In the disclosure, non-oriented electrical steel sheets may be produced following conventional methods as long as the chemical composition and the hot rolling conditions defined in the disclosure are within the predetermined ranges. That is, molten steel is subjected to blowing in the converter and degassing treatment where it is adjusted to a predetermined chemical composition, and subsequently to casting and hot rolling. The finisher delivery temperature and the coiling temperature during hot rolling are not particularly specified, yet it is necessary to perform at least one pass of the hot rolling in a dual phase region of γ-phase and α-phase. The coiling temperature is preferably set to 650° C. or lower in order to prevent oxidation during coiling. Then, the steel sheet is subjected to cold rolling once, or twice or more with intermediate annealing performed therebetween, to a predetermined sheet thickness, and to the subsequent final annealing.


Examples

Molten steel was subjected to blowing in the converter to prepare steel samples. Each steel sample was then subjected to degassing treatment, cast into the chemical compositions in Table 3, subjected to slab reheating at 1140° C. for 1 h, and hot rolled to obtain a steel sheet having a sheet thickness of 2.0 mm. The hot finish rolling was performed in 7 passes, the entry temperature in the first pass and the entry temperature in the final pass were set as listed in Table 3, and the coiling temperature was set to 670° C. Thereafter, each steel sheet was subjected to pickling, cold rolling to a sheet thickness of 0.5 mm, and final annealing in a 20% H2-80% N2 atmosphere under the conditions in Table 3. Then, the magnetic properties (W15/50, B50) and hardness (HV) were evaluated. In the magnetic property measurement, Epstein samples were cut in the rolling direction and the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction from each steel sheet, and Epstein measurement was performed. Vickers hardness was measured in accordance with JIS Z2244 by pressing a 500 g diamond indenter into a cross section of each steel sheet. The grain size was measured in accordance with JIS G0551 after polishing the cross section and etching with nital.













TABLE 3









Chemical composition (mass % )
Ar1
Ar3






















No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
Ge
Ti
V
Zr
Nb
O
N
(° C.)
(° C.)





1
0.0018

1.40

0.15
0.020
0.0020
0.500
0.0001
0.0005
0.0005
0.0001
0.0003
0.0010
0.0020




2
0.0017
1.30
0.18
0.030
0.0020
0.200
0.0001
0.0007
0.0005
0.0001
0.0002
0.0015
0.0018
1080
1020 


3
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


3
0.0018
1.53
0.30
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


4
0.0018
1.80
0.62
0.020
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
990
930


5
0.0018
1.80
0.61
0.020
0.0015
0.002
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
990
930


6
0.0018
1.80
0.62
0.020
0.0015
0.004
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
990
930


7
0.0018
1.30
0.30
0.030
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0017
990
930


8
0.0018
1.42
0.30
0.030
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0018
1000
940


9
0.0018
2.00
0.80
0.010
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
980
920


10
0.0018
2.50
1.20
0.010
0.0017
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0018
0.0020
970
910


11
0.0020
3.10
1.60
0.010
0.0016
0.001
0.0001
0.0005
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0012
0.0016
970
910


12
0.0018
2.00
2.00
0.010
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0007
0.0007
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
880
820


13
0.0038
3.74
0.35
0.010
0.0011
0.013
0.0001
0.0005
0.0005
0.0001
0.0003
0.0007
0.0009




14
0.0038
3.74
0.35
0.010
0.0011
0.013
0.0001
0.0005
0.0005
0.0001
0.0003
0.0007
0.0009




15
0.0021
2.00
3.00
0.010
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0010
0.0008
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
790
730


16
0.0018

4.60

3.00
0.010
0.0016
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0009
0.0001
0.0002
0.0009
0.0022
920
860


17
0.0019
2.00
3.50
0.010
0.0012
0.001
0.0001
0.0010
0.0008
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0018
740

680



18
0.0020
2.50

5.60

0.030
0.0014
0.500
0.0001
0.0006
0.0007
0.0001
0.0005
0.0020
0.0017
780
720


19
0.0018
1.55
0.95
0.030
0.0018
0.300
0.0001
0.0006
0.0005
0.0001
0.0003
0.0021
0.0018
1060
1000 


20
0.0015
1.62
0.95
0.030
0.0015

0.600

0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0022
0.0015




21
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.030
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


22
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.030
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


23
0.0018
1.63
0.30
0.100
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1020
960


24
0.0018
1.80
0.81

0.250

0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0020
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
1040
980


25
0.0018
1.80
0.82
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0020
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
980
920


26
0.0016
1.80
0.59
0.020
0.0015
0.002
0.0200
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0019
0.0020
992
932


27
0.0019
1.80
0.55
0.020
0.0015
0.002
0.0600
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0022
995
935


28
0.0018
1.81
0.81
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0040
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0022
980
920


29
0.0018
1.82
0.80
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0021
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015
0.0020
980
920


30
0.0018
1.79
0.81
0.050
0.0014
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0037
0.0001
0.0003
0.0016
0.0021
980
920


31
0.0018
1.82
0.75
0.050
0.0016
0.001
0.0001
0.0005
0.0006
0.0010
0.0003
0.0017
0.0023
980
920


32
0.0018
1.80
0.77
0.050
0.0013
0.001
0.0001
0.0004
0.0006
0.0028
0.0003
0.0020
0.0024
980
920


33
0.0018
1.81
0.76
0.050
0.0009
0.001
0.0001
0.0003
0.0006
0.0001
0.0015
0.0022
0.0018
980
920


34
0.0018
1.82
0.72
0.050
0.0013
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0038
0.0015
0.0019
980
920


35
0.0018
1.80
0.73
0.050
0.0010
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003

0.0260

0.0022
980
920


36
0.0018
1.79
0.74
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0015

0.0060

980
920


37

0.0062

1.79
0.75
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0017
980
920


38
0.0018
1.82
0.72
0.050

0.0260

0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
980
920


39
0.0018
1.81

0.04

0.050
0.0020
0.001
0.0001
0.0005
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0019
0.0016
1040
980


40
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.050
0.0014
0.001
0.0001
0.0004
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


41
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.050
0.0012
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


42
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950


43
0.0018
1.62
0.30
0.050
0.0015
0.001
0.0001
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.0003
0.0020
0.0015
1010
950
























Sheet temp.
Sheet temp.



Finisher









at entry side
at entry side

Hot band
Sheet
delivery
Grain




in F1
in F7
Stands in
annealing
thickness
temp.
size

W15/50
B50



No.
(° C.)
(° C.)
dual phase
(° C.)
(mm)
(° C.)
(μm)
HV
(W/kg)
(T)
Remarks







1
1030
910


0.50
950
120
145
3.60
1.64
Comparative














Example



2
1030
910
F1

0.50
950
119

133

4.20
1.70
Comparative














Example



3
1030
910
F3, F4, F5

0.50
950
121
150
3.50
1.70
Example



3
1030
910
F3, F4, F5

0.50
950
121
142
3.62
1.70
Example



4
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
155
3.40
1.69
Example



5
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
155
3.41
1.68
Example



6
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
115
155
3.45
1.67
Example



7
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121

135

4.00
1.71
Comparative














Example



8
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
890
70
150
4.50
1.71
Comparative














Example



9
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
165
2.60
1.68
Example



10
980
860
F2, F3, F4

0.50
1000
140
191
2.20
1.67
Example



11
980
860
F2, F3, F4

0.50
1020
150
220
2.00
1.66
Example



12
980
860
F5, F6, F7

0.50
1000
140
170
3.20
1.68
Example



13
1030
910


0.50
1000
120
220
2.60
1.62
Comparative














Example



14
1030
910

1100
0.50
970
130
220
2.20
1.70
Comparative














Example



15
870
750
F6, F7

0.50
1000
140
176
3.00
1.66
Example



16
980
860
F5, F6, F7

0.50
1020
140

290

2.60
1.64
Comparative














Example



17
850
730
F5

0.50
1000
140
176
3.00
1.63
Comparative














Example



18
850
730
F4, F5

0.50
1000
121
170
2.90
1.60
Comparative














Example



19
1030
910
F1, F2

0.50
950
121
152
3.50
1.66
Example



20
980
860


0.50
950
118
158
3.50
1.64
Comparative














Example



21
980
860
F1, F2

0.50
870
52
165
4.30
1.70
Comparative














Example



22
980
860
F1, F2

0.50
1100

210


135

3.90
1.68
Comparative














Example



23
980
860
F1

0.50
950
121
165
3.45
1.71
Example















24
990
870
F1

fracture occurred during cold rolling
Comparative









Example




















25
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
120
155
3.60
1.66
Example



26
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
155
3.45
1.67
Example



27
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
155
3.60
1.65
Example



28
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
115
155
3.92
1.65
Example



29
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
131
156
3.61
1.66
Example



30
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
119
154
3.95
1.65
Example



31
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
125
156
3.62
1.66
Example



32
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
115
155
3.90
1.65
Example



33
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
120
153
3.60
1.66
Example



34
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
113
155
3.92
1.65
Example



35
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
105
160
4.60
1.63
Comparative














Example



36
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
112
156
4.40
1.63
Comparative














Example



37
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
118
156
3.89
1.63
Comparative














Example



38
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
105
157
4.80
1.61
Comparative














Example



39
990
870
F1

0.50
950
106
151
3.90
1.63
Comparative














Example



40
980
860
F1, F2, F3

0.50
950
121
150
3.48
1.71
Example



41
960
840
F1

0.50
950
121
150
3.50
1.70
Example



42
950
830


0.50
950
120
150
3.70
1.68
Example



43
1070
950


0.50
950
119
150
3.60
1.69
Example







Final annealing time = 10 s



HV = 500 g in cross section






From Table 3, it can be seen that all of the non-oriented electrical steel sheets according to our examples in which the chemical composition, the Ar3 transformation temperature, the grain size, and the Vickers hardness are within the scope of the disclosure have both excellent magnetic flux density and iron loss properties as compared with the steel sheets in the comparative examples.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the disclosure, it is possible to provide non-oriented electrical steel sheets achieving a good balance between the magnetic flux density and iron loss properties without performing hot band annealing.


REFERENCE SIGNS LIST






    • 1 Ring sample


    • 2 V caulking




Claims
  • 1.-4. (canceled)
  • 5. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet comprising a chemical composition containing, by mass %, C: 0.0050% or less,Si: 1.50% or more and 4.00% or less,Al: 0.500% or less,Mn: 0.10% or more and 5.00% or less,S: 0.0200% or less,P: 0.200% or less,N: 0.0050% or less, andO: 0.0200% or less,
  • 6. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 5, wherein the chemical composition further contains, by mass %, Ge: 0.0500% or less.
  • 7. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 5, wherein the chemical composition further contains, by mass %, at least one of Ti: 0.0030% or less,Nb: 0.0030% or less,V: 0.0030% or less, orZr: 0.0020% or less.
  • 8. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 6, wherein the chemical composition further contains, by mass %, at least one of Ti: 0.0030% or less,Nb: 0.0030% or less,V: 0.0030% or less, orZr: 0.0020% or less.
  • 9. A method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet as recited in any one of claim 5, the method comprising performing hot rolling in at least one pass or more in a dual phase region from γ-phase and α-phase.
  • 10. A method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet as recited in any one of claim 6, the method comprising performing hot rolling in at least one pass or more in a dual phase region from γ-phase and α-phase.
  • 11. A method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet as recited in any one of claim 7, the method comprising performing hot rolling in at least one pass or more in a dual phase region from γ-phase and α-phase.
  • 12. A method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet as recited in any one of claim 8, the method comprising performing hot rolling in at least one pass or more in a dual phase region from γ-phase and α-phase.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2015-197103 Oct 2015 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2016/003878 8/25/2016 WO 00
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180202021 A1 Jul 2018 US