This invention relates in general to aeronautics, and more particularly, to aerial cargo unloading by parachute extraction.
In the past, airdrop cargo loads have been extracted from the aircraft by one or more 28-foot extraction parachutes. At times, the cargo has failed to be drawn from the aircraft because of human error, aircraft lock malfunction, or parachute material damage. When a failure or malfunction occurs, the extraction parachute is left trailing behind the aircraft. The parachute can generate drag forces high enough to stall the aircraft. The cargo handler must go behind the load and use a knife to manually cut the extraction line. This is an extremely dangerous and potentially life-threatening maneuver. When more than one extraction parachute is used, the aircraft must proceed to the nearest airfield for an emergency landing.
It is therefore an object of this invention to allow safe, easy release of extraction parachutes in case of an airdrop malfunction.
This and other objects of the invention are achieved in one aspect by a device for severing an extraction line connected between a cargo load and an extraction parachute when the cargo load fails to eject from an aircraft. The device comprises a cutter spaced from and spring-biased in the direction of the extraction line; a housing for the cutter; means for mechanically restricting the cutter from engaging and severing the extraction line; and means responsive to a radio signal from a transmitter on the aircraft for disabling the restricting means so that the cutter is released and severs the extraction line.
Another aspect of the invention involves a method of severing an extraction line connected between an extraction parachute and a cargo load when the cargo load fails to eject from an aircraft. The method comprises the steps of spacing a cutter from the extraction line; spring-biasing the cutter in the direction of the extraction line; mechanically restricting the cutter with restricting means from engaging and severing the extraction line; and disabling the restricting means in response to a radio signal from a transmitter on the aircraft so that the cutter is released and severs the extraction line.
On command, the cargo handler can activate the device from any location on the aircraft and jettison the extraction parachute. No pyrotechnics are involved, so there are no restrictions imposed by the use of explosives. There are no cables to come loose and entangle with the airdrop loads or the cargo handler's feet. One low power coded EMI shielded transmitter may be used on all aircraft without risk to other aircraft flying nearby. The aircraft can carry multiple transmitters.
Additional advantages and features will become apparent as the subject invention becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The invention as embodied in a typical aerial delivery system is illustrated in
In operation of the device, the bolt 61 passing through the spacer 55 and plates 39-45 is removed, and the spacer 55 is removed from between the plates. Then, the extraction line 25 is attached around the spacer 55, and the spacer 55 is repositioned between the plates. Next, the cutter 27 is retracted and the trip lever 31 is positioned in the way of the cutter to mechanically restrict the cutter from engaging the extraction line 25. Finally, the bolt 61 is replaced and the nut 55 is tightened.
In the event the cargo load 17 fails to eject from the aircraft 11, the user of the device 23 transmits a radio signal from a transmitter on the aircraft to the radio receiver 35 to activate the solenoid 33. The solenoid 33 pivots the trip lever 31 out of the way of the cutter 27 so that the cutter is released and severs the extraction line 25, jettisoning the extraction parachute 21.
It is obvious that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3023498 | Temple et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3134154 | Smith et al. | May 1964 | A |
3670999 | Leger | Jun 1972 | A |
3840988 | Hoffman | Oct 1974 | A |
4174015 | Farcinade | Nov 1979 | A |
4493240 | Norton | Jan 1985 | A |
4513931 | Kenzie | Apr 1985 | A |
5284310 | Conway | Feb 1994 | A |
5697581 | Conroy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5816535 | Underwood | Oct 1998 | A |
6578885 | Tillman | Jun 2003 | B1 |