Electronic multiple pole multiple throw (MPNT) switches are widely used. An MPNT switch is a switch having M poles (“P”) and N throws (“T”), where M>1 and N>1. A pole and a throw are coupled to one another by a pole-throw signal path that includes at least one switching element such as a transistor. An electrical signal is routed on a signal path between one of the M poles and one of the N throws when that pole-throw signal path is in a conductive state.
In a single transmission mode MPNT switch, only a single pole-throw signal path is conductive at one time. In a multiple transmission mode MPNT switch, more than one pole-throw signal path may be conductive at the same time. A multiple transmission mode MPNT switch may be used in a communication device that operates in multiple input multiple output (MIMO) mode. In an MPNT antenna switch operating in MIMO mode, two or more paths are conductive at the same time, thereby enabling two or more antennas to transmit or receive signals at the same time.
The poles and throws that are in conductive signal paths may have good impedance matching, resulting in minimal signal reflection and a low voltage stopping wave ratio (VSWR). The poles and throws that are in non-conductive signal paths may have unmatched impedances, resulting in high reflection and high VSWR. For some switch applications it may be useful to have good impedance matching and low reflection in most or all of the signal paths, including the signal paths that are non-conductive. A switch with these characteristics is called a non-reflective (or absorptive or terminated) switch.
A non-reflective ring topology MPNT switching device comprises at least two poles, at least four throws, plural main switches, and plural bridge switches. The bridge switches enable all throws to be non-reflective throughout a wide frequency range. Each main switch is connected between one of the poles and one of the throws. Each bridge switch is connected between two of the throws, and each throw is connected to at least M+1 of the bridge switches, M being the pole count. In operation, each of M of the main switches has a first (ON) state and is connected to one of M active throws. For each active throw, each bridge switch connected to the active throw has a second (OFF) state. For each non-active throw, one bridge switch connected to the non-active throw has the first (ON) state and each other connected bridge switch has the second (OFF) state.
Additional embodiments are described in the detailed description below. This summary does not purport to define the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.
Reference will now be made in detail to some embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In this description and in the appended claims, the terms ‘a’ or ‘an’ are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this description and in the appended claims, the term ‘or’ is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, unless otherwise indicated.
The 2P4T switching device 10 has a ring topology. The simplest example of a ring topology MPNT switching device is a 2P2T switching device such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,939. In an MPNT switching device having a ring topology, each ring includes two poles 11 and two throws 12 and four main switches 13 and any conductors that link these elements. In the ring topology switching device 10 of
Each bridge switch 14 is connected between two of the throws 12. For example, bridge switch 14C is connected between throw 12C and throw 12D. Similarly, bridge switch 14E is connected between throw 12B and throw 12D. Bridge switches 14A-D are basic bridge switches 14, and bridge switches 14E-F are augment bridge switches 14. A basic bridge switch 14 is a bridge switch 14 that is connected between two throws 12 that are adjacent to one another. For example, basic bridge switch 14A is connected between throws 12A and 12B which are adjacent to one another. An augment bridge switch 14 is a bridge switch 14 that is connected between two throws 12 that are not adjacent to one another. For example, augment bridge switch 14F is connected between throws 12A and 12C which are not adjacent to one another.
In this description and in the appended claims, the adjectives “main” and “bridge” are used to indicate the locations of switches, and these adjectives do not imply any special attributes for a main switch 13 or a bridge switch 14. A main switch 13 is a switch that is connected between a pole 11 and a throw 12, and a bridge switch 14 is a switch that is connected between two throws 12. As described below in connection with
Operation of the switching device 10 is as follows. In the 2P4T switching device 10 of
Throws 12C and 12B are active throws 12 (dashed rectangle indicates active throw). An active throw 12 is a throw 12 that is connected to a main switch 13 that has the first state. Similarly, an active pole 11 is a pole 11 that is connected to a main switch 13 that has the first state. In the embodiment of
For each active throw 12, each of the bridge switches 14 that is connected to the active throw 12 has the second state. Thus, active throw 12B is connected to three bridge switches 14A, 14B, and 14E, each of which has the second state. Similarly, active throw 12C is connected to three bridge switches 14B, 14C, and 14F, each of which has the second state. For each non-active throw 12, one of the bridge switches 14 that is connected to the non-active throw 12 has the first state and each other bridge switch 14 that is connected to the non-active throw 12 has the second state. Thus, non-active throw 12A is connected to bridge switch 14D which has the first state, and non-active throw 12A is also connected to bridge switches 14A and 14F which have the second state. Similarly, non-active throw 12D is connected to bridge switch 14D which has the first state, and non-active throw 12D is also connected to bridge switches 14C and 14E which have the second state.
In the 2P4T switching device 10 of
For the throws 12, non-reflectivity results from coordination of the states of the bridge switches 14 and the main switches 13. An individual throw 12 is connected to five switches, two main switches 13 and three bridge switches 14. If a single one of those five switches is in the ON state, this creates a circuit with reasonably matched impedances, resulting in minimal reflection for the throw 12. If a throw 12 is an active throw 12, it is coupled to a pole 11 through a main switch 13 that is in the ON state, resulting in minimal reflection for both the pole 11 and the active throw 12. If a throw 12 is a non-active throw 12, it is coupled to one other non-active throw 12 through a bridge switch 14 that is in the ON state, resulting in minimal reflection. In other words, reflection may be minimized if each non-active throw 12 is paired with one other non-active throw 12 by coupling through a bridge switch 14 that is in the ON state.
The device state depicted in
The twelve rows (device states) in Table 1 include two groups of six rows, rows 1-6 and rows 7-12. The active throws 12 in each of rows 1-6 are the same as the active throws 12 in each of rows 7-12, respectively, but the linkage of active throws 12 to poles 11 differs between rows 1-6 and rows 7-12. For example, in row 1 the linkages are 11A-12A and 11B-12B, whereas in row 7 the linkages are 11A-12B and 11B-12A. The term “basic group” is used here to refer to the six sets of active throws 12 that correspond to the active throws 12 in rows 1-6 or rows 7-12.
For a general MPNT switching device 10, the number of sets of active throws 12 in the basic group is determined as follows, using the 2P4T case as an example. A 2P4T switching device 10 has four throws 12, two of which can be active at a time. The number of possible combinations of X things taken Y at a time is given by the formula: X!/(Y!(X−Y)!). For a switching device 10 with four throws 12, two of which can be active, X=4 and Y=2. Evaluating the formula with these values for X and Y, the number of possible combinations of four throws taken two at a time equals six. These six possible combinations of throws 12 correspond to the six sets of active throws 12 in rows 1-6 or rows 7-12.
As noted, the linkage of poles 11 to active throws 12 differs between rows 1-6 and rows 7-12. The basic group of six sets of active throws 12 appears twice, once for each of the poles 11. There are two poles 11 and there are six sets in the basic group, so the total number of rows (device states) in Table 1 is two multiplied by six which equals twelve. For a general MPNT switching device 10, the number of device states equals the pole count M (the number of poles 11) multiplied by the number of sets of active throws 12 in the basic group, which is determined using the formula in the previous paragraph.
The 2P4T switching device 10 of
If non-active throws 12 are to be paired with one another through a bridge switch 14, there should be an even number of non-active throws 12. For a switching device 10 in which the number of active throws 12 is the same as the pole count M, the number of non-active throws 12 equals the throw count N minus the pole count M. To enable pairing of non-active throws 12, the difference between the throw count N and the pole count M should equal an even integer that is greater than or equal to two. In the embodiment of
For a general MPNT switching device 10 having M poles and N throws, how many bridge switches 14 should be connected to each throw 12 in order to ensure non-reflectivity? Consider the case where a first throw 12 is connected to M bridge switches 14, each of which is connected to one other throw 12, resulting in M other throws 12 that are potential pairing partners for the first throw 12. In one device state, the first throw 12 is non-active and each of the M other throws 12 is active. In this device state there is a problem: no non-active throw 12 is available for pairing with the non-active first throw 12, because each of the potential pairing partners is an active throw 12. Therefore, a throw 12 should be connected to at least M+1 bridge switches 14 in order to ensure that the throw 12 can always find at least one non-active throw 12 that it can pair with.
Assuming that each throw 12 is connected to at least M+1 bridge switches 14, we can determine the minimum number of bridge switches 14 needed for a general MPNT switching device 10. There are N throws 12, and each throw 12 is connected to M+1 bridge switches 14. Also, each bridge switch 14 is connected to two throws 12. Thus, the bridge switch count B (the number of bridge switches 14) should be greater than or equal to N(M+1)/2.
The 2P4T switching device 10 of
Table 2 indicates the thirty possible device states for the 2P6T switching device 10 of
There are thirty possible device states for the 3P5T switching device 10 of
The total number of device states=M×10=3×10=30. In the device state depicted in
There are sixty possible device states for the 4P6T switching device 10 of
The total number of device states=M×15=4×15=60. In the device state depicted in
Table 3 summarizes information about the MPNT switching devices 10 depicted in
For some embodiments, there may be more than one way to position the M+1 bridge switches 14 for each throw 12 and the B bridge switches 14 for the entire switching device 10. The flexibility of positioning for bridge switches 14 depends upon the value of the difference N minus M.
In a switching device 10 for which the difference N minus M equals two, there is no flexibility in positioning of the bridge switches 14. For example, in a 3P5T switching device 10, N minus M equals 5 minus 3 which equals 2. So M=N−2. The number of bridge switches 14 connected to each throw 12 is at least M+1, and by substitution M+1=(N−2)+1=N−1. Thus, each throw 12 is linked to N−1 other throws 12 via N−1 bridge switches 14. But there are only N throws 12 total, including the throw 12 of interest, so linkage to N−1 other throws 12 implies linkage to every other throw 12. In other words, there is only a single valid solution, in which each throw 12 links to every other throw 12, so there is no flexibility in positioning of bridge switches 14.
In contrast, in a switching device 10 for which the difference N minus M is greater than or equal to four, there is more than one way to position the bridge switches 14. For example, in a 2P6T switching device 10, N minus M equals 6 minus 2 which equals 4. So M=N−4. The number of bridge switches 14 connected to each throw 12 is at least M+1, and by substitution M+1=(N−4)+1=N−3. For a 2P6T switching device 10, N−3=6−3=3. Thus each throw 12 is linked to 3 other throws 12 via 3 bridge switches 14. The throw 12 of interest need not be linked to every other throw 12; it needs to link to only 3 of the other 5 throws 12. As a result, there is flexibility in positioning of the bridge switches 14, and alternative positionings are possible.
In the 2P6T embodiment depicted in
In the embodiments of
In the 2P6T embodiment depicted in
Variation with respect to number and positioning of bridge switches 14 offers flexibility in design. This flexibility may be advantageous in terms of circuit layout, insertion loss, isolation, power handling, linearity, or other parameters. It may be advantageous to employ basic bridge switches 14 rather than augment bridge switches 14, for two reasons. First, when a pair of adjacent throws 12 is linked in a throw-throw signal path via a basic bridge switch 14, the throw-throw signal path need not cross any other throw-throw signal path. In contrast, when pairs of non-adjacent throws 12 are linked in throw-throw signal paths via augment bridge switches 14, those throw-throw signal paths cross one another. Secondly, a throw-throw signal path between adjacent throws 12 that includes a basic bridge switch 14 is generally shorter in length than a throw-throw signal path between non-adjacent throws 12 that includes an augment bridge switch 14. Augment bridge switches 14 may offer advantages in some situations, however. Additional embodiments that differ in number and position of bridge switches 14 are discussed in connection with
In the embodiments of
In the embodiments of
The 3P3T switching device 10 of
To enable pairing of non-active throws 12 via bridge switches 14, each throw 12 is connected to two of the bridge switches 14. Similarly, each pole 11 is connected to two of the pole bridge switches 16. In other embodiments, described in connection with
To minimize reflectivity of non-active throws 12 and poles 11, the states of bridge switches 14 and pole bridge switches 16 are coordinated with the states of main switches 13, as described for bridge switches 14 in connection with
Table 4 indicates the nine possible device states for the 3P3T switching device 10 of
As noted, the 3P3T switching device 10 depicted in
Table 5 indicates the three possible device states for the 3P3T switching device 10 of
Table 6 compares the 3P5T embodiment of
The number of bridge switches 14 and pole bridge switches 16 needed for minimizing reflectivity depends upon the value of A, rather than the value of M, for the embodiments of
In the embodiments of
If the switching device 10 is to be capable of operating in several modes with different values of A, then the number of connected bridge switches 14 and the number of connected pole bridge switches 16, determined as in the preceding paragraph, should be large enough for non-reflective operation in each of the several modes. If the number of connected bridge switches 14 or connected pole bridge switches 16 is greater than the minimum needed in a given mode, then the extra switches are set to the second (OFF) state. Additional embodiments similar to those of
The main switches 13, bridge switches 14, and pole bridge switches 16 for the embodiments described herein may be realized in a variety of ways. Each type of switch may be realized using series switching elements or variable shunt elements or a configuration that combines series switching elements and variable shunt elements. Switches may be realized using these configurations: series-only, series-shunt-series, or variable shunt combined with transmission lines.
Embodiments described herein may be implemented as integrated circuits or using discrete components. The several types of switches (main switches 13, bridge switches 14, pole bridge switches 16, termination switches 15) may be implemented as semiconductor switching elements such as diodes or PIN diodes or bipolar transistors or field effect transistors (FET). For example, switching elements may be implemented as silicon based (Si-based) FETs or as gallium arsenide based (GaAs-based) FETs. Si-based FETs include silicon junction FET (JFET), silicon metal-semiconductor FET (MESFET), silicon germanium bipolar CMOS (SiGe BiCMOS), and various types of silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (MOSFET) such as NMOS, CMOS, silicon on sapphire (SOS), and silicon on insulator (SOI). GaAs-based FETs include GaAs JFET, GaAs MESFET, GaAs pseudomorphic high electron mobility transistor (pHEMT), GaAs metamorphic high electron mobility transistor (mHEMT), and GaAs heterostructure FET (HFET).
Tables 7-14 present the results of simulating two circuit designs. Each of the simulated designs is for a 2P4T (also called DP4T) switching device. One of the simulated designs (NON-REFLECT) is the 2P4T switching device 10 that is depicted in
Each simulation assumes that there are two conductive (ON) signal paths, 11A-12A and 11B-12B. This device state corresponds to row 1 in Table 1. Tables 7-12 present the return loss values for a range of frequencies for individual poles 11 or throws 12. The simulation results for the NON-REFLECT design show very low return loss values throughout a frequency range from DC to 6 GHz. The return loss values are approximately negative 18 to negative 24 dB for each of the poles 11A-11B and for each of the throws 12A-12D. The non-active throws 12C and 12D show return loss values that are as low as the values for the active throws 12A and 12B. In contrast, the simulation results for the REFLECT design show very high return loss for the non-active throws 12C and 12D. For non-active throws 12C and 12D, the return loss values are negative 0.5 dB or higher in the frequency range from DC to 6 GHz.
The simulation results of Tables 7-12 demonstrate that embodiments described in this application provide a practical way to make a non-reflective MPNT switching device with low return loss throughout a wide frequency range, including microwave frequencies up to at least 6 GHz.
Inclusion of bridge switches 14, as in the NON-REFLECT design, causes only modest changes in insertion loss and isolation. Tables 13-14 present the simulation results for insertion loss and isolation for a range of frequencies for selected signal paths. As noted above, there are two conductive (ON) signal paths, 11A-12A and 11B-12B. In the conductive signal path 11B-12B, insertion loss is a little larger in the NON-REFLECT design than in the REFLECT design. In the non-conductive signal path 11B-12D, isolation is somewhat less in the NON-REFLECT design than in the REFLECT design.
Bridge switches 14 and/or pole bridge switches 16 are used for non-reflectivity in the embodiments of
In the embodiment of
The possible device states for the embodiment of
In each device state for the embodiment of
For some applications, it may be acceptable for one or more terminal (pole 11 or throw 12) to be reflective. For such applications, one may use a switching device 10 in which a majority of the terminals are non-reflective and a minority of the terminals are reflective. For example, one could use a switching device 10 that is similar to the embodiments of
Although we have described in detail various embodiments, other embodiments and modifications will be apparent to those of skill in the art in light of this text and accompanying drawings. The following claims are intended to include all such embodiments, modifications and equivalents.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/008,011, filed Dec. 18, 2007. The above-referenced application is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4731594 | Kumar | Mar 1988 | A |
4983865 | Ho et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5446424 | Pierro | Aug 1995 | A |
5465087 | Cooperman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5642083 | Kato et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5812939 | Kohama | Sep 1998 | A |
5933122 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5991607 | Burdenski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6265953 | Romano | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6496082 | DiPiazza | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6737933 | Nyberg | May 2004 | B2 |
6774701 | Heston et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7079816 | Khorram et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7138846 | Suwa et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7307490 | Kizuki et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7719383 | Gu | May 2010 | B2 |
20090058553 | Gu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090153222 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61008011 | Dec 2007 | US |