The invention relates to threaded closure and finish systems and more particularly to a closure and finish system in which the closure, once applied, substantially resists rotational movement and is rendered substantially non-removable by the customer.
There are a variety of food, beverage and healthcare products for which a non-removable closure would be advantageous. A non-removable closure system is generally understood to be one in which, following attachment of the closure to the container body, the closure cannot be detached from the container without deliberately applying such large forces that would at least partially damage the container and/or the closure. Such damage would thus prevent continued use of the container body and/or closure.
For example, it is well known to provide an injection molded preform with a relatively thick finish area having an external thread, and a lower body portion that is subsequently blow molded to form a relatively thin container body. The relatively thick finish wall provides the necessary structural strength for secure application of a closure having a complementary internal threaded portion, while the expanded container body is sufficiently strong to withstand product filling, handling and expected use, but is often substantially weaker than the finish area. The preform(s)/container(s) for such applications are typically made from thermoplastic polymers such as polyesters (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate PET) and polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene or polyethylene). The closure is also typically a molded plastic article, formed separately from the container, and may be made of polyolefin or polyester.
Most applications for such thermoplastic containers and closures are single use applications, wherein the container and closure are essentially discarded after the product is used. In such applications, it is desirable to minimize the amount of material required, and minimize the complexity of the injection and blow molding equipment, in order to produce the container and closure at a competitive price. These limitations on material usage and equipment/process complexity are also constraints on the design of a non-removable closure/container system where it is desired that customer be unable to remove the closure and refill (reuse) the container. However, these constraints make it more difficult to design a closure/container system with sufficient structural integrity to withstand (resist) customer attempts to remove the closure.
In one embodiment, a non-removable closure and finish system is provided comprising:
a plastic container having a longitudinal axis and an upper cylindrical neck finish with at least two thread segments symmetrically disposed around an outer wall of the finish;
a plurality of finish lugs disposed beneath the finish thread segment adjacent a lowermost end of each finish thread segment;
a plastic closure having a top wall, an outer skirt and an inner skirt disposed radially inwardly from the outer skirt, at least two closure thread segments symmetrically disposed around an inner wall of the inner skirt and adapted to lie beneath a respective finish thread segment, and;
a plurality of closure lugs adjacent a lowermost end of each closure thread segment, the closure lugs being disposed to lie between the finish lugs for resisting removal of the closure from the finish.
In one embodiment, each closure lug has a ramp edge to facilitate application of the closure to the finish, and an opposed abutment edge for locking the closure to the finish. Similarly, the finish lug may have a ramp edge to facilitate application of the closure to the finish and an opposed abutment edge for locking the closure to the finish. A projecting stop may be provided at a lowermost end of the finish thread segment to prevent over-torquing of the closure onto the finish.
In one embodiment, the inner skirt is of a lesser height than the outer skirt, wherein the height is defined with respect to the central container axis. Providing the closure lugs on the inner skirt, and more preferably on an inner skirt of lesser height, makes it more difficult to access the lugs if attempts are made to disengage by the lugs. Also, some or all of the lugs may be greater in height than the thread segments in order to increase the resistance of the lug locking mechanism to disengagement.
In one embodiment, the finish is relatively more rigid than the closure. The finish thread segments and lugs may be relatively more rigid than the closure thread segments and lugs.
In one embodiment, the closure and/or the finish are each an injection molded article. The finish and closure may be molded from plastic materials such as polyolefins, e.g. polypropylene or polyethylene, or polyesters, e.g. PET. Alternatively, the finish and/or closure may be extrusion or compression molded. The finish may also be blow molded or otherwise expanded after initial molding.
In one embodiment, there are at least two diametrically opposed thread segments on each of the closure and finish. The finish thread segments may have overlapping ends, as well as the closure thread segments; this provides greater rigidity and resistance to removal of the closure. Depending on the finish size, there may be four, six or more sets of diametrically opposed thread segments on each of the closure and finish.
In one embodiment, the finish and closure each have three or more lugs e.g., four, six or more, depending on the finish size. The lugs may be integral with the lower thread surface, or spaced therefrom. The lugs may be spaced apart from one another, or integral. The finish and closure lugs preferably prevent any rotational movement to loosen the closure on the finish. The abutting surfaces of the finish and closure lugs may apply a positive sealing force between an inner surface of the closure and a top sealing surface of the finish.
In one embodiment, the container finish and closure form a standing end, e.g. of a top down or inverted container. As a further option the container may have at least one gripping surface or labeling surface and the finish lugs may be positioned to orient a hinge or spout on the closure with respect to the at least one gripping surface or labeling surface.
In another embodiment, a non-removable closure and finish system is provided comprising:
complementary sets of thread segments on the closure and finish, each segment having a plurality of ratchet-type engaging portions disposed adjacent one end of the segment, each engaging portion having a ramped leading edge to facilitate rotation in one direction and a trailing abutment edge to resist rotation in the opposite direction; and the closure having an outer skirt and an inner skirt, the inner skirt being radially spaced from the outer skirt and having an inner wall on which the thread segments and engaging portions are disposed.
In one embodiment, the engaging portions on the finish are disposed below the finish thread segment, and the engaging portions on the closure are spaced from the one end of the closure thread segment. The engaging portions on the finish may extend from a lower surface of the finish thread segment. Alternatively, the engaging portions on the finish may be spaced from a lower surface of the thread segment. The engaging portions on the closure may extend below the closure thread segments or be spaced apart from the closure thread segments. A stop may be provided at one end of the finish thread segment to prevent over-torquing. Another stop may be provided on the inner wall of the inner skirt to engage the leading edge of the finish thread segment, for the same purpose. The closure (once applied) may thus be rendered substantially non-rotational in both directions. In a still further embodiment, the finish engaging portions may have a diameter greater than the finish thread segment diameter, and the closure engaging portions may have a diameter less than the closure thread segment diameter
The above and further advantages of various embodiments of the invention may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
One or more embodiments of the present invention will now be described with respect to the container and closure illustrated in
This particular container is intended for use in commercial establishments, e.g. restaurants, and is provided with a substantially non-removable closure. This enables the product manufacturer to deliver a filled container to the retail establishment (restaurant) and prevents (restaurant employee(s) from refilling the container. In this embodiment, the force required to remove the closure is sufficiently high that the closure cannot be manually removed (by hand). Furthermore, if a mechanical element (tool) is used by an employee in an attempt to remove the closure, e.g., a long thin instrument such as a knife, the difficulty in accessing the locking mechanism between the closure and finish and the respective strengths of the container and closure are such that the bottle and/or closure will be substantially deformed so as to be rendered unusable (if the employee is successful in removing the closure). Most likely the container will be crushed or buckle and thus rendered unacceptable for further use in a commercial establishment.
The container 10 has a finish portion 11 (shown generally in phantom lines in
In accordance with the present embodiment, the finish 11 has a plurality of lugs which engage complementary lugs on the closure and provide a locking mechanism that renders the closure 20 substantially non-removable. In this embodiment, there are four (4) spaced-apart vertical lugs 38a, 38b, 38c and 38d, provided adjacent the lowermost end 47a and 47b of each thread segment 36a and 36b, and formed integral with and extending down from each of the respective thread segments 36a and 36b. The lugs effectively function as ratchet teeth which allow rotational movement in only one direction. The spaced-apart lugs or ratchet teeth 38 are separated by outer wall portions 35 between each pair of adjacent lugs. These spaces or wall portions 35 form notches which receive complementary shaped lugs or ratchet teeth on the closure, as shown in
The closure 20 has inner thread segments 60a and 60b which are designed to sit below and support the finish thread segments 36a and 36b, respectively. Each of the finish lugs 38a-d (see
Also provided at the end of each thread segment 36a and 36b is a projecting portion 40 which functions as a stop. Stop 40 prevents over-torquing of the closure threads onto the finish threads, i.e., it prevents the closure threads and/or lugs from jumping over the finish threads during application of the closure to the finish.
As shown in
A third skirt or sealing ring 28 lies radially within the inner skirt and is of a lesser height than the inner skirt 25. The ring 28 has an outer wall that forms a sealing surface for engaging an upper edge portion 45 of the finish wall 32. The top sealing surface 31 of the finish engages a sealing surface 27 on the bottom of top wall 67, between sealing ring 28 and inner skirt 25. The sealing engagement of 28/45 and 27/31 provide both structural support between the closure and finish and prevention of product leakage.
As best shown in
There has thus been described an embodiment of the present invention comprising a locking mechanism for preventing reverse (loosening) rotation of the closure by application of manual force. The abutting surfaces of the ratchet teeth (lugs) on each of the closure and finish prevent such reverse rotation. The amount of force required to overcome the lugs is sufficiently high that the closure cannot be manually removed. If a user attempts to deform the container or closure either manually or with a tool in order to gain access to the locking mechanisms (ratchet teeth), such efforts are substantially thwarted by providing the ratchet teeth on the inner skirt of the closure. Because this inner skirt is radially inwardly disposed with respect to the outer skirt, and also of a lesser height, simple insertion of a knife beneath the lower edge of the outer skirt will not be sufficient to engage or disrupt the locking mechanism. Generally, the structural integrity of each of the closure and container will be such that any successful effort to reach the locking mechanism and overcome the lugs will substantially deform either the closure or container (or both) such that they will be rendered unusable.
In alternative embodiments, the number, placement and dimensions of the lugs or ratchet teeth can be varied on one or more of the closure and finish. There should be at least two lugs on each of the closure and finish, with four or more being preferred (e.g., 4, 5, 6 . . . ) in select applications. Also, the number of thread segments can be varied. There should be at least two thread segments which are preferably diametrically opposed, so that the forces between the closure and finish are evenly distributed around the circumference of the closure and finish. Preferably, the thread segments have overlapping ends for greater engagement of the closure and finish thread segments. More than two thread segments can be provided; however it may be more difficult to remove an injection molded finish with more than two thread segments from the injection mold. Alternatively, there may be four thread segments. If more thread segments are used, there may be a lesser number of lugs associated with each thread segment.
Another benefit of the present embodiment is a reduced finish height, which for an inverted container is generally more stable. The two thread segments can be provided with a relatively steep pitch so there is sufficient vertical height to add the lugs below the thread segments on the outer wall 32. In the present embodiment, the thread pitch is about 0.167 inch and the thread lead 0.334 inch. The height of the finish is 0.530 inch. In contrast, a typical prior art finish for this type of container is 0.650 inch. By providing a lower finish height, there is less material used and a resulting cost savings. Also, by injection molding the lugs of both the finish and closure, a more rigid locking mechanism is provided.
In the described embodiment, it was found to require about 30 inch-pounds of force to apply the closure to the finish. Providing a stop at the end of the thread segments prevents the ratchets and threads from jumping over the threads if a very high application force, e.g., 60-70 inch-pounds, is applied.
In the present embodiment the height of at least some of the lugs (in the axial direction A) is four times greater than the height of the thread segments. Preferably, at least some of the lugs are at least double the height of the thread segment.
In the present embodiment the closure lugs are spaced from and separate from the end of the thread segment. Alternatively, the closure lugs may be integral with and/or below the closure thread segments.
The material used for the closure and finish will depend upon the particular application. In the present embodiment, the closure is made of polypropylene, and the container is made from bottle grade polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin. The container is made from an injection molded preform, the body portion of which is blow molded to form the container body. The finish has an outer diameter of 33 mm, a wall thickness (upper portion 32) of 0.088 inch, a thread diameter (T dimension) of 1.255 inch, and a lug diameter of 1.270 inch; the sidewall thickness of the container is about 0.63 mm. The closure in the present embodiment is injection molded. The closure has an inside wall diameter of about 33 mm, a wall thickness of 0.045 inch, a thread diameter on the inside wall (E dimension) of 1.224 inch, a thread diameter (T dimension) of 1.280 inch, and a lug diameter of 1.272 inch. By making the finish lug diameter greater than the finish thread diameter, the closure lug diameter can be made less than the closure thread diameter; this makes it easier to strip the closure from the injection mold. Also, by extending the lugs closer to the closure wall and minimizing the distance/gap/clearance, the ability to deflect the lugs/notches is reduced and the non-removability of the closure thus enhanced. For greater rigidity, both the finish and closure can be injection molded from PET. Preferred ranges for the finish and closure are:
for the finish:
for the closure:
The container body (sidewall or weakest area) would typically have a wall thickness of 0.015-0.080 inch.
In alternative embodiments, the container and/or finish may be extrusion molded or compression molded. The finish may also be blow molded or otherwise expanded after the initial molding step.
There are various advantages to providing a substantially non-removable and substantially non-rotatable closure and finish assembly. One benefit is to provide security to the customer that the product has not been tampered with. A second benefit is an improvement of the mechanical seal between the top sealing surface and the closure, which prevents leakage. A third benefit of the locking mechanism is that it provides an orientation point about the circumference of the container, which can be used to insure that the gripping orientation of the closure with respect to the container is fixed, i.e., the hinge on the flip top is positioned with respect to the nonsymmetrical container body to facilitate gripping of the container by the user and dispensing of the product. One or more of these advantages may be useful in a particular application.
These and other modifications would be readily apparent to the skilled person as included within the scope of the described invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1849522 | Hammer | Mar 1932 | A |
2423582 | Coleman | Feb 1945 | A |
4053077 | DeFelice | Oct 1977 | A |
4084716 | Bogert | Apr 1978 | A |
4378073 | Luker | Mar 1983 | A |
4387817 | Wiles et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4763801 | Nycz | Aug 1988 | A |
4821898 | Smalley | Apr 1989 | A |
4913299 | Petro | Apr 1990 | A |
5169033 | Shay | Dec 1992 | A |
5360127 | Barriac et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5458252 | Logel | Oct 1995 | A |
5722545 | Rinne | Mar 1998 | A |
5803291 | Valles | Sep 1998 | A |
5810184 | Adams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5850681 | La Barre | Dec 1998 | A |
6047840 | Moore et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6334555 | Randall et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6669063 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6769895 | Derouault et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020162817 | Vassallo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060186077 | Robinson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186078 | Ziegenhorn | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070034595 | Foster et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080000932 | Cleary et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 812 777 | Dec 1997 | EP |
884 691 | Dec 1961 | GB |
2 108 095 | May 1983 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080296251 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |