Non-rocking, webbed container for carbonated beverages

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6536619
  • Patent Number
    6,536,619
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 29, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 25, 2003
    22 years ago
Abstract
A blow molded plastic container including a neck finish, a shoulder portion, a sidewall, and a base integrally formed with one another. Two indentations in the sidewall create a handgrip and a web extends generally across the interior of the container between the two indentations. A plurality of generally downwardly extending support feet include short feet and long feet. Separating the support feet are a plurality of first and second strap formations. Support surface contact points of the long feet are in a planar relationship with respect to one another, thereby providing the container with stability when empty. After filling, capping and pressurizing, the support surface contact points of the short feet and the support surface contact points of the long feet are all in a planar relationship with respect to one another, thereby providing the container with stability when filled.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to plastic containers for beverages. More specifically, containers to which the present invention will have particular application include carbonated beverage containers having a support web extending across the interior of the container and having a footed base structure. Such containers are often formed from polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyolefin, polyethylene napthalate (PEN) or other suitable materials.




2. Description of the Prior Art




Generally, carbonated beverage containers are formed from an injection or extrusion molded preform which is blow molded within a blow mold into the desired configuration. The container includes a neck finish (which also defines the opening into the container and which includes threads for retaining a closure cap on a container), a shoulder portion extending downward from the neck finish, a base which closes off the bottom of the container and a sidewall or body extending between the shoulder portion and the base. The base can be provided in a variety of styles. One style is a champagne base configuration. This style has an inwardly directed, conical portion which also defines a support ring around the base. Another style is a footed base configuration with two or more feet.




While carbonated beverage containers come in a wide variety of sizes, one of the more popular sizes is the common two liter bottle. This container is preferred by the public because of the convenience and the economy which it provides to the end consumer. Because these containers have a relatively large diameter, they have proven awkward during handling and pouring, especially for individuals with small hands. This problem is further compounded when the container has yet to be opened. In that situation the internal pressure of the container causes an outward bulging in the container sidewall further increasing the container's diameter.




In an attempt to alleviate the above problem, it has been proposed to form a carbonated beverage container having recesses or depressions in its sidewall to form a handgrip. U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,828 discloses one such container and is incorporated herein by reference. The container of that patent is formed with two generally opposed depressions in its sidewall and the depressions operate as a handgrip for the container. To prevent the everting of the handgrips, an internal supporting structure was incorporated into the container. This support is in the form of a web or wall extending across the diameter of the container between the handgrips.




While the web works in allowing the container to be formed with handgrips, it has been found that the base of such a container, particularly when filled, capped and pressurized, causes the container to “rock” or “wobble” when the container is placed on a flat support surface. While not completely and fully understood, it is believed that the incorporation of the web into the container has an effect on providing support to the feet located adjacent to the web. As a result, when the container is pressurized, the outboard feet (those feet not adjacent to the web) expand in a manner different from those feet adjacent to the web causing the rocking problem. This rocking problem is particularly noted when the container is provided with a footed base, as is currently standard practice in the industry.




In view of the foregoing limitations and shortcomings of the prior art devices, as well as other disadvantages not specifically mentioned above, it should be apparent that there still exists a need in the art for an improved carbonated beverage container of the above variety.




It is therefore a primary object of this invention to fulfill that need by providing a footed, carbonated beverage container which resists rocking of the container before and after pressurization.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a carbonated beverage container having handgrips and which resists rocking of the container before and after pressurization of the container.











Additional benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates from the subsequent description of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.




DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side elevational view of a container embodying the principles of the present invention and illustrating only two of the feet in the base of the container;





FIG. 2

is a side elevational view of the container seen in

FIG. 1

with the container rotated 90° to the left and illustrating two of the feet in the base of the container;





FIG. 3

is a bottom view of the footed base of the container seen in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 4

is a diagrammatic sectional view of the lower portion of the container seen in

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 5

is a diagrammatic sectional view of the lower portion of the container seen in FIG.


2


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Briefly described, the above and other objects are accomplished according to the present invention by providing a carbonated beverage container


10


which is formed into the configuration generally seen in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. Located at the top of the container


10


is a neck finish


12


which defines an opening


13


into the interior of the container


10


. The finish


12


is threaded and permits the engagement of a closure cap (not shown) with the container


10


. Integrally formed with the neck finish


12


and extending downward therefrom is a shoulder portion


14


which merges into the sidewall or body


16


of the container


10


. At the lower end of the sidewall


16


is an integrally formed base


18


that closes off the bottom of the container


10


.




The sidewall


16


of the container


10


is formed with a pair of generally opposed indentations or recesses


20


. The recesses


20


are designed to form handgrip areas


28


in the sidewall


16


of the container


10


and they also divide the sidewall


16


of the container


10


into a front lobe


22


and a rear lobe


24


. In order to structurally support the handgrips


28


, a web


26


extends generally across the interior of the container


10


, between the recesses


20


. The web


26


also extends from the base


18


of the container


10


up to approximately the upper portion of the recesses


20


. The web


26


is perhaps best seen in

FIGS. 2

,


3


and


4


.




As a result of the incorporation of the web


26


into the container


10


, the base


18


of the container


10


operates, both during and after molding, in a manner which differs from non-webbed containers. As a result, it has been found that when a webbed container is filled with a product, capped and pressurized, the resulting base of the container is uneven and the container rocks on the base.




To alleviate the rocking problem, the present invention incorporates two different strategies. First, feet


30


on the base


18


are not molded having the same height. Second, the profile of straps


32


, those portions which extend between adjacent feet


30


, is not the same for all the straps


32


in the container


10


. Each of these strategies are further discussed below.




As seen in

FIG. 3

, the preferred embodiment of the present container


10


incorporates a six footed base design with an equal amount of feet


30


being located on opposing sides of a plane


34


defined axially through the container


10


by the web


26


. The feet


30


are individually designated as foot


30


A through foot


30


F, with foot


30


A and foot


30


D located approximately 180° from each other on opposing sides of a plane


35


defined axially through the container


10


, each of foot


30


A and foot


30


D are thereby located at approximately 90° right angles relative to the web


26


. Also for reference, as seen in

FIG. 3

, it is noted that foot


30


A, foot


30


B, and foot


30


F are located on one side of the web


26


, while foot


30


C, foot


30


D, and foot


30


E are located on the opposing side of the web


26


. Located between each adjacent foot


30


are straps


32


mentioned above. Straps


32


are designated as straps


32


A through


32


F with straps


32


B and


32


E corresponding with the web


26


.




In order to solve the rocking problem discussed above, the blow mold in which the container


10


is formed is tooled so that the container cavity defines feet of differing lengths. In the specifically illustrated embodiment, foot


30


A and foot


30


D, the feet located on opposing sides of the plane


35


and at approximately 90° right angles relative to the web


26


, are formed to be shorter than the remaining feet, foot


30


B, foot


30


C, foot


30


E, and foot


30


F. Accordingly, foot


30


A and foot


30


D can be referred to as the short feet while foot


30


B, foot


30


C, foot


30


E, and foot


30


F can be referred to as the long feet.




As illustrated in the figures, the particular container illustrated therein is a two liter container weighing approximately 58 grams. The height X (see

FIG. 4

) of the short feet


30


A and


30


D measured between a horizontal datum


36


drawn through the container


10


and a short feet contact point


37


with a support surface


39


is 38.44 mm. The height Y (see

FIG. 5

) of the long feet


30


B,


30


C,


30


E, and


30


F measured between the horizontal datum


36


and a long feet contact point


41


with the support surface


39


is 38.68 mm. Accordingly, it can be seen that the short feet


30


A and


30


D have a length which is approximately 0.24 mm less than the long feet


30


B,


30


C,


30


E, and


30


F. The support surface


39


contact point


41


of the long feet


30


B,


30


C,


30


E, and


30


F are all in a planar relationship with respect to one another thus providing the container


10


with stability when empty. Similarly, when the container


10


is empty, the support surface


39


contact point


37


of the short feet


30


A and


30


D are both in a planar relationship with respect to each other. It should be noted that while specific dimensions are being recited herein, these dimensions may necessarily vary and be greater or lesser than the above dimension depending on the specific design and size of the container. However, the general principles discussed herein will apply equally as well to those of other containers. Accordingly, a greater or lesser height difference and overall height for the feet


30


could be used in containers of the same size, in containers of differing sizes and in containers of differing designs.




In addition to the different foot heights, the container


10


is also constructed with straps


32


of varying configurations and profiles. More specifically, straps


32


B and


32


E, between the adjacent long feet


30


B and


30


C, and


30


E and


30


F differ in their configuration from the configuration of straps


32


F,


32


A,


32


C, and


32


D located between the long and short feet


30


F and


30


A,


30


A and


30


B,


30


C and


30


D, and


30


D and


30


E. Referring to the strap designations, straps


32


B and


32


E are configured with the same profile as generally seen in FIG.


5


. Straps


32


A,


32


C,


32


D, and


32


F are configured with the same profile as seen in FIG.


4


. It is noted that in both

FIGS. 4 and 5

, the cross section through the container


10


shows both the straps


32


and the feet


30


. For a reduction in the number of drawings, these cross sections are accordingly illustrated as composites in these figures.




The configuration of all of the straps


32


is similar to the extent that an upper portion


38


, that portion closest to the sidewall


16


of the container


10


, is generally planar while a lower portion


40


is defined by a radius of curvature. In the illustrated embodiment, the upper portion


38


of straps


32


A,


32


F,


32


C and


32


D is provided with an angularity


44


that, when measured from a generally vertical line


42


, is inclined at approximately 45° (see FIG.


4


). The upper portion


38


of straps


32


B and


32


E is provided with an angularity


46


that, when measured from the generally vertical line


42


, is inclined at approximately 31° (see FIG.


5


). Accordingly, straps


32


A,


32


F,


32


C, and


32


D are closer to horizontal than straps


32


B and


32


E. Furthermore, the radius of curvature for straps


32


A,


32


F,


32


C, and


32


D is less than the radius of curvature for straps


32


B and


32


E. These are respectfully illustrated as being 58.9 mm and 84.14 mm. A difference of about 25.24 mm. From this it is seen that the straps


32


B and


32


E, which correspond with the web


26


are generally flatter in their lower portions


40


and generally steeper in their upper portions


38


than straps


32


A,


32


F,


32


C and


32


D (see FIGS.


4


and


5


).




As with the prior discussion regarding the height of the feet


30


, the specifically recited dimensions of the strap


32


profiles are those for the particular container


10


illustrated in the figures. Variations in container size and shape are anticipated to result in necessary changes in these dimensions. Such changes, however, are well within the purview of this invention.




After filling, capping and pressurizing, it has been found that the short feet


30


A and


30


D, and the long feet


30


B,


30


C,


30


E and


30


F effectively undergo different movement as a result of pressurization and non-symmetrical bulging in the sidewall


16


caused by the presence of the web


26


. When provided with strap profiles of the same configuration, the result is feet having differing heights and a rocking container. By configuring the feet


30


and straps


32


as described above, the bulging of the sidewall


16


and movement of the feet


30


is controlled so as to produce a pressurized container


10


whose feet


30


all exhibit substantially the same height even though undergoing different movements, enabling the container


10


to resist rocking. Thus, after filling, capping and pressurizing, the support surface


39


contact point


37


of the short feet


30


A and


30


D, and the support surface


39


contact point


41


of the long feet


30


B,


30


C,


30


E and


30


F are all in a planar relationship with respect to one another, thereby providing the container


10


with stability when filled. Since rocking is resisted both before and after filling, the benefits of the present construction are seen not only during use by the end consumer, but also during the transporting, labeling, filling and manufacturing of the container.




While six feet are illustrated in the preferred embodiment, it should be understood that a lesser number or a greater number of feet could also be utilized. While it is believed that an even number of feet is preferred, in the appropriate context an odd number of feet might also be employed. At a minimum, however, a container


10


embodying the principles of the present invention would incorporate at least two feet, one located on each side of the web


26


. In such a two footed design, the height of each foot would vary over its width.




While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A blow molded plastic container comprising a neck finish, a shoulder portion, a sidewall, a base and a web integrally formed with one another, said web located within said container extending between opposing portions of said sidewall, a plurality of generally downwardly extending support feet intended to contact a support surface and support said container thereon, said support feet being formed at spaced apart locations circumferentially around said base, at least two of said support feet having a first height and the remainder of said support feet having a second height, said first and second heights being measured from a common horizontal datum through said container, said first height being less than said second height, wherein said support feet having said first height move, establishing a third height substantially equal to said second height such that all of said support feet contact said support surface when said container is pressurized.
  • 2. The container of claim 1 wherein said plastic is a polyethylene terephthalate.
  • 3. The container of claim 1 wherein said support feet having said second height contact said support surface.
  • 4. The container of claim 1 wherein adjacent ones of said support feet are separated by strap formations, said strap formations defining profiles in vertical cross section, at least two of said strap formations defining a first profile and the remainder of said strap formations defining a second profile.
  • 5. The container of claim 4 wherein said profiles include a generally planar upper portion and a generally semi-circular lower portion.
  • 6. The container of claim 1 wherein said support feet having said first height are located on said base generally opposite one another.
  • 7. The container of claim 1 wherein said support feet having said first height are located generally 90° from a plane defined by said web.
  • 8. The container of claim 1 further comprising at least two indentations protruding inward from said sidewall forming handgrips such that said container can be easily grasped.
  • 9. The container of claim 8 wherein said web extends upwardly from said base to approximately an upper portion of said indentations.
  • 10. The container of claim 1 pressurized with a carbonated beverage.
  • 11. A blow molded plastic container comprising a neck finish, a shoulder portion, a sidewall, a base and a web integrally formed with one another, said web located within said container extending between opposing portions of said sidewall, a plurality of generally downwardly extending support feet intended to contact a support surface and support said container thereon, said support feet being formed at spaced apart locations circumferentially around said base, at least two of said support feet having a first height and the remainder of said support feet having a second height, said first and second heights being measured from a common horizontal datum through said container, said first height being less than said second height, wherein two of said support feet having said first height are located generally 90° from a plane defined by said web.
  • 12. A blow molded plastic container comprising a neck finish, a shoulder portion, a sidewall, a base and a web integrally formed with one another, said web located within said container extending between opposing portions of said sidewall, at least five generally downwardly extending support feet intended to contact a support surface and support said container thereon, said support feet being formed at spaced apart locations circumferentially around said base, at least two of said support feet having a first height and the remainder of said support feet having a second height, said first and second heights being measured from a common horizontal datum through said container, said first height being less than said second height, wherein said support feet having said first height move, establishing a third height substantially equal to said second height such that all of said support feet contact said support surface when said container is pressurized.
  • 13. The container of claim 12 wherein said support feet having said second height contact said support surface when said container is empty.
  • 14. The container of claim 12 wherein two of said support feet having said first height are located generally 90° from a plane defined by said web.
  • 15. The container of claim 12 wherein said support feet having said first height are located on said base generally opposite one another and said support feet having said second height are located on said base generally adjacent to said web.
  • 16. A blow molded plastic container comprising a neck finish, a shoulder portion, a sidewall, a base and a web integrally formed with one another, said web located within said container extending between opposing portions of said sidewall, six generally downwardly extending support feet intended to contact a support surface and support said container thereon, said support feet being formed at spaced apart locations circumferentially around said base, two of said support feet having a first height and four of said support feet having a second height, said first and second heights being measured from a common horizontal datum through said container, said first height being less than said second height, wherein said support feet having said first height move, establishing a third height substantially equal to said second height such that all of said support feet contact said support surface when said container is pressurized.
  • 17. The container of claim 16 wherein said support feet having said first height are located generally 90° from a plane defined by said web.
  • 18. The container of claim 16 wherein said support feet having said second height contact said support surface when said container is empty.
  • 19. The container of claim 16 wherein said support feet having said first height are located on said base generally opposite one another and said support feet having said second height are located on said base generally adjacent to said web.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/242,788 filed on Feb. 19, 1999, which is a national phase filing of PCT/US97/15868, filed Sep. 9, 1997, claiming priority to Provisional Application No. 60/025,693, filed Sep. 9, 1996.

US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
4249667 Pocock et al. Feb 1981 A
4276987 Michel Jul 1981 A
4520936 Lyons Jun 1985 A
4865206 Behm et al. Sep 1989 A
4978015 Walker Dec 1990 A
5232108 Nakamura Aug 1993 A
5287978 Young et al. Feb 1994 A
5398828 Valyi Mar 1995 A
5549210 Cheng Aug 1996 A
5579937 Valyi Dec 1996 A
6059139 Landreneau May 2000 A
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/025693 Sep 1996 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/242788 US
Child 09/997105 US