The present invention relates to air/fuel pre-mixers for combustors, and more particularly to non-swirl air/fuel pre-mixers for stationary gas turbine combustors.
The U.S. stationary power industry is continually being required to lower its pollution levels, especially those of nitrogen oxide gas (NOx), to very low levels. Currently, the industry standard for NOx emissions ranges from 3 to 20 parts per million (ppm). However, federal and state environmental protection agencies are now demanding exhaust emission levels to 3 ppm or below in most areas of the country. Thus, a combustor delivering NOx levels below 1 ppm would likely become certified as the “Best Available Technology” for lowering NOx levels.
Some prior art combustors employ a single central diffusion pilot swirler operating at equivalence ratios between 0.8 and 1.2 surrounded by eight premix swirlers operating at equivalence ratios of approximately 0.4. Other prior art combustors employ multiple large scale (>1.0 inch) swirl injectors and pre-mixers to minimize NOx formation. At best, however, such technology generally obtains NOx emissions as low as 25 ppm. Still other previous devices employ air/fuel premixing within the vanes of a swirler while injecting the pilot fuel from the swirler's center nozzle in order to stabilize the swirler's central diffusion flame. Because the fuel/air mixing distances with these swirler's are lower than those of the other previous devices, this approach can achieve NOx emissions down to about 9 ppm, but no further.
One source of NOx emissions occurs in the high temperature recirculation flame holding zones created by the prior art pilot injectors. These pilot injectors produce the bulk of the combustor's NOx in these flame holder areas. Clearly, such technology falls short of the current upper limit of 3 ppm NOx emissions.
In a typical combustor, air from a multistage axial compressor is discharged radially outward and around the annular combustor. The air flows through the swirl injectors and mixes and burns with the natural gas fuel in the combustor. The combustion product gas is subsequently expanded through a multi-element axial expander (i.e. a turbine) and exhausted to atmosphere.
These swirlers are highly susceptible to acoustic combustion instability. This is because gas turbines require very low air side pressure drops across the combustion chamber in order to maintain high turbine operating efficiencies. Swirler combustors essentially take all of the air-side pressure drop at the axial location of the swirler. Accordingly, the combustion chamber and air plenums within the combustor lack sufficient damping to avoid acoustical instabilities.
Furthermore, pre-mix swirlers are very susceptible to detrimental combustion flashback during turn-down and start-up operation because of their large characteristic dimension (e.g., above 1.0 inch). For proper combustor operation, all combustion is designed to take place downstream of the swirlers where there is sufficient air film cooling and ceramic coatings to protect the combustor walls. Flashback, via the associated internal combustion in the swirler, frequently damages the swirler by overheating it.
Another problem with the previously implemented swirl combustors occurs during power turn-down wherein the overall fuel flow is reduced to equivalence ratios below 0.4. Industry currently handles turn-down operation by shutting off the fuel to selected pre-mix swirlers in order to maintain stable combustion. However, the air from these non-fueled swirlers rapidly mixes with and cools the combustion products from the active pre-mix swirlers before the partially combusted carbon monoxide (CO) can be effectively oxidized to CO2. Hence, during turndown operation, swirler combustors inherently produce excessive amounts of carbon monoxide (well above the adiabatic equilibrium combustion amounts of approximately 3 ppm).
Thus, a need exists to improve the previous combustors, particularly with regard to NOx and CO emissions. Additionally, a need exists to reduce, or eliminate, the acoustic instabilities and flashback that conventional combustors suffer from. Furthermore, a need exists for the capability to burn essentially pure hydrogen fuel having very high air premix flame speeds to reduce the occurrence of detrimental flashbacks and burnouts known to occur in conventional swirler injectors.
An improved pre-mixer for a gas turbine combustor and a method of pre-mixing air and fuel for a combustor are provided by the present invention. The improved “non-swirl” combustors described herein eliminate the acoustical instabilities and flashbacks associated with the previous devices. The new combustors provided by the present invention employ multi-element, microfine injector technology adapted herewith for turbine combustor applications. Moreover, the present invention provides NOx and CO emissions as low as 3 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively, at full power and even at low turndown ratios as low as 5 and 10 ppm respectively.
In one embodiment, the pre-mixer includes a first annular fuel manifold disposed upstream of the combustor and an annular member concentric with the first fuel manifold. Together the annular fuel manifold and the annular member define a first venturi shaped air/fuel pre-mix volume between them that has a throat. At or upstream from the throat, the first fuel manifold has a plurality of pores whereby the fuel is injected from the first fuel manifold to mix with air in the first pre-mix volume. In another embodiment, the annular member is an outer wall, whereas in yet another embodiment, the annular member is a second fuel manifold.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a fuel injector that includes a first annular premix fuel manifold disposed upstream of the combustor and an annular member concentric with the first premix fuel manifold. Together the annular premix fuel manifold and the annular member define a first venturi shaped air/fuel pre-mix volume between them that has a throat. At or upstream from the throat, the first premix fuel manifold has a plurality of pores whereby the fuel is injected from the first premix fuel manifold to mix with air in the first pre-mix volume. In another embodiment, the annular member is an outer wall, whereas in yet another embodiment, the annular member is a second premix fuel manifold.
In another form, the present invention provides a method of pre-mixing air and fuel for a gas turbine combustor. The method includes defining a first vortex shaped pre-mix volume between a first annular premix fuel manifold and an annular member. When formed the first pre-mix volume has a throat. Additionally, the method also includes injecting fuel from the first premix fuel manifold through a plurality of pores in the first fuel manifold at or upstream of the throat and mixing the fuel with air in the pre-mix volume.
The features, functions, and advantages can be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present inventions or may be combined in yet other embodiments.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
The current invention solves the high NOx and superequilibrium CO emission, acoustic instability, and flashback problems associated with the previous combustors by employing numerous small scale (less than 0.150-in.) non-swirl multi-element pre-mix injectors. In accordance with the principles of the present invention these injectors also incorporate diffusion pilots.
Additionally, by maintaining very low mixing lengths within a single diffusion pilot, and among multiple diffusion pilots, the present invention minimizes the high temperature recirculation flame holding zones of the pilots. Additionally, the present invention also provides adequate flammability and flame stabilization for the combustor system while minimizing those holding zones.
Moreover, rather than using all of the air side pressure drop through the combustor at one discrete axial location (i.e., in the turning vanes), the present invention spreads the pressure drop across the entire length of the air feed system. Accordingly, the distributed pressure drop provides greater acoustic stability margin. Moreover, the pre-mixers provided by the present invention utilize small hydraulic diameters that are below the fuel/air premix quenching distance to thereby prevent flashback.
Referring now to the Figures in general.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention,
In another preferred embodiment, the pre-mixer itself is approximately 2-in. (50.8 mm) long to provide adequate mixing length for the fuel injected into the annuli at the upstream venturi throat location. It should be noted that the cross-sectional flow area at the air's venturi location is sized to ensure uniform air flux over the annuli's radial direction while providing adequate manifold volume for the pre-mix fuel manifolds. Moreover, the air velocity at the venturi throat is lower than the air velocities found in the turning vanes of previous swirlers. Accordingly, the present invention improves the pressure distribution through the combustor. Additionally, the venturi geometry may provide for pressure recovery so that a significant amount of the air side pressure drop can be used within the downstream annuli as well as in the upstream air plenum surrounding the combustor liner.
In another preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a system capable of low emissions even during turn down operation. Accordingly,
Turning now to
Each pair of premix fuel manifolds 118 defines a venturi shaped pre-mix volume 124. Of course, the outermost premix fuel manifold 118 and the outer wall 114 may form one of the pre-mix volumes 124. Additionally, the inner wall 115 and the inner most premix fuel manifold 118 may also form a pre-mix volume 124. The pre-mix volume 124 includes a throat 126 at or downstream from a plurality of pores 128 (see
Notably, turbulence of the air causes the fuel and air to begin mixing almost immediately. It should also be noted that the venturi shape of the pre-mix volume 124 promotes pressure recovery as the air/fuel mixture emerges from the throat 126. Accordingly, the recovered pressure drop may be distributed elsewhere in the air intake subsystem to allow for improved combustion stability.
Once beyond the premix fuel manifolds 118, the partially mixed air and fuel flows into the extended annular pre-mixing volumes 132 between adjacent sheets 120. Along the length (preferentially about 2 inches: 50.4 mm) of the extended pre-mix volumes 132 the air and fuel continuing mixing until the mixture is essentially complete. Shortly thereafter, the air/fuel mixtures flows from the extended volumes 132 and passes one of the pilot fuel injectors 122. Because some of the air/fuel mixture passes through a flame front held by the pilot fuel injectors 122 the air/fuel mixture ignites and burns as it flows through the combustion chamber 116.
Regarding details of the premix fuel manifolds 118,
The fuel pores 128 on the front surface 138 may be formed by sintering a series of screens 146 together to form the front surface 138 of the premix fuel manifold 118. Alternatively, the pores 128 may be laser drilled holes formed in the body of the premix fuel manifold 118 with diameters on the order of 0.002 to 0.004 inches (0.0508 mm–0.1016 mm) or smaller.
Additionally, the fuel passageway 130 communicates with an external fuel supply as shown in
Regarding details of the pilot injectors 122,
With reference to
With reference to
Fuel may enter the fuel pathway 74 through any appropriately shaped port, but as the pathway 74 nears the injector port 90, the pathway becomes substantially rectangular having a height that is much greater than the width W. The upstream side of the main injector 52 includes an inlet port 94 that is substantially circular in shape. Nevertheless, the injector port 90 is substantially rectangular in shape. The fuel stream 92 is already substantially spread out or thinned before it reaches an intersection point with another fuel stream 92. As two fuel streams 92 intersect, they produce a fuel plume 96 which allows the fuel provided through the injector ports 90 to be mixed with the air exiting the oxidizer pathways 72.
With reference to
The injector orifice 94 may be any appropriate size, for example, about 0.001 to about 0.1 inches (about 0.254 mm to about 2.54 111 m). Additionally, the injector orifice 94 may have any appropriate shape. For example, the injector orifice 94 may be a selected geometrical shape, such as an octagon, or other appropriate polygon. Furthermore, the injector orifice 94 may be a slot substantially equal to the injector slot 92. Therefore, the injector orifice 94 need not simply be circular or round in shape and size, but may be any appropriate size to provide the fuel jet through the injector orifice 94 to engage the splash plate 102. In addition, the length of the orifice 94 may be any appropriate length.
In one preferred embodiment, the pilot fuel injector 122 possesses a width of about the quenching distance (shown in
It should be noted that the support structure 134 and the pilot fuel injector 122 fill a volume about that of one of the extended volumes 132. Correspondingly greater air flow (and air velocity) results in the extended volumes 132 adjacent the pilot fuel injector 122. Accordingly, the air/fuel mixing in the adjacent extended volumes 132 exceeds that in the other extended volumes 132. Thus, the pilot arrangement of the present invention provides for combustor 110 startups and operations that are less susceptible to combustion instability.
An end cap 148 (shown in
Turning now to the extended premix volumes 132, the sheets 120 are disposed so that the extended volumes 132 will not allow flashback from the combustion chamber 116 to propagate into the extended volumes 132. Accordingly, the distance d1 between adjacent sheets 120 is less than, or at most equal to, about the quenching distance of the fuel employed in the combustor 110. In a preferred embodiment, a 0.150 inch (3.81 mm) gap separates adjacent sheets 120. In another preferred embodiment, a honeycomb insert 136 (shown in
With Reference now to
The fuel manifolds 218 are disposed concentrically around the center of the combustor 210 with venturi shaped throats 226 therebetween and pores (not shown) disposed at, upstream, or even downstream of the throats 226. Downstream from the fuel manifolds (by a distance pre-determined to allow optimal mixing of the air and fuel), the honeycomb insert 236 prevents flashback from the combustion chamber 216 to the mixing volume 232.
The fuel sub-system 240 includes fuel ports 242 and 244 for connection to one or more external fuel supplies. From the ports 242 and 244, fuel flows into one or more fuel chambers 229A and 229B, from which the fuel flows into the central bores 230 of the fuel manifolds 218. Then the fuel flows through the pores of the fuel manifolds 218 for mixing with the incoming air. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the chambers 229A and 229B may be separated by a gas or liquid barrier 231 to allow for selective fueling of the inner and outer rings of fuel manifolds 218. Thus, the combustor 210 may operate at low turn down ratios without an attendant increase in carbon monoxide (CO) emissions.
Of course, the fuel chamber 229 includes a pair of radial closeouts 233 and a pair of circumferential (e.g., inner and outer) closeouts 235A and 235B to seal the fuel in the chamber 229. Of course, the radial closeouts 233, manifolds 218, insert 236, and circumferential closeouts 235 define the pre-mix volume 232.
Turning now to the bluff body 234, the bluff body 234 may include one or more pilot injectors 222 in communication with a fuel chamber 229. It will be recognized that the radial bluff bodies 234 provide a downstream wake for holding the flame provided by the pilot injectors 222. Of course, if fuel is shut off to a particular fuel chamber 229A, the injectors 222 associated with that chamber 229A will be turned off along with the manifolds 218 associated with the chamber 229A. Accordingly, the present embodiment provides a combustor 210 that is convenient to manufacture.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the present invention reduces NOx and CO emissions to less than 10 ppm at both full power and reduced power operating conditions. More particularly, the present invention reduces NOx and CO emissions to between about 3 and about 10 ppm, respectively. Additionally, the present invention provides greater acoustic stability for low pressure drop gas turbine combustors. In addition, the present invention also eliminates detrimental flashback and the associated hardware failures of the prior art swirler combustors. Accordingly, combustors in accordance with the principles of the present invention also enjoy better performance and longer life.
Moreover combine cycle gas turbine combustor systems (using steam turbine bottoming cycles) in accordance with the present invention possess thermal efficiency approaching 60% whereas many previous steam power plants possess thermal efficiency of about 35% at best. Thus, in addition to power generation, the present invention may be incorporated into many other land and marine applications wherein fuel efficiency is desired. Additionally, a the present invention provides systems and methods to burn essentially pure hydrogen fuel using very high air premix flame speeds thereby offering improved reliability over that of the conventional swirler injectors.
While various preferred embodiments have been described, those skilled in the art will recognize modifications or variations which might be made without departing from the inventive concept. The examples illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit it. Therefore, the description and claims should be interpreted liberally with only such limitation as is necessary in view of the pertinent prior art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2655787 | Brown | Oct 1953 | A |
2930192 | Johnson | Mar 1960 | A |
3877863 | Penny | Apr 1975 | A |
3914096 | Schladitz | Oct 1975 | A |
4030875 | Grondahl et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4072007 | Sanday | Feb 1978 | A |
4141213 | Ross | Feb 1979 | A |
4628687 | Strom | Dec 1986 | A |
4651534 | Stroem | Mar 1987 | A |
4731989 | Furuya et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4870824 | Young et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4928481 | Joshi et al. | May 1990 | A |
5000004 | Yamanaka et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5054280 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5214912 | Farrauto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5281128 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5309637 | Moriarty | May 1994 | A |
5319923 | Leonard et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321948 | Leonard | Jun 1994 | A |
5395235 | Lan-Sun Hung | Mar 1995 | A |
5450725 | Takahara et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461864 | Betta et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5497611 | Benz et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5511972 | Dalla Betta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512250 | Dalla Betta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518697 | Dalla Betta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5575153 | Ito et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577906 | Hanakata et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5675971 | Angel et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5709077 | Beichel | Jan 1998 | A |
5715673 | Beichel | Feb 1998 | A |
5836164 | Tsukahara et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5899679 | Euzen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5938427 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956937 | Beichel | Sep 1999 | A |
5970702 | Beichel | Oct 1999 | A |
6109018 | Rostrup-Nielsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6170264 | Viteri et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174159 | Smith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182436 | Prociw et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189314 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192688 | Beebe | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202402 | Sattelmayer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205768 | Dibble et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209325 | Alkabie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289667 | Kolaczkowski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302683 | Vestin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334309 | Dean et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358040 | Pfefferle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386862 | Fujita et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415608 | Newburry | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6520769 | Tachihara et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6584760 | Lipinski et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595003 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612830 | Berry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6669463 | Beutel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6709264 | Hermann et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712602 | Kang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718772 | Dalla Betta et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6752623 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20020139119 | Touchton et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030056519 | Newburry | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030192318 | Sprouse et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192319 | Sprouse et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040000146 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003598 | Farhangi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040048211 | Martin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050076647 | Farhangi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 14 092 | Sep 2000 | DE |
0 304 707 | May 1988 | EP |
0 889 289 | Jun 1998 | EP |
58-179730 | Oct 1983 | JP |
59-107119 | Jun 1984 | JP |
60-66022 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60-64131 | Dec 1985 | JP |
WO 0227243 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050188703 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |