Patent Grant
10452151
The technology disclosed relates generally to human-machine interactivity, and in particular to machine responsiveness to dynamic user movements and gestures.
The subject matter discussed in the background section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background section or associated with the subject matter of the background section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also correspond to implementations of the claimed technology.
Traditionally, users have interacted with electronic devices (such as a computer or a television) or computing applications (e.g., computer games) using external input devices (e.g., a keyboard or mouse). The user manipulates the input devices to facilitate communication of user commands to the electronic devices or computing applications to perform a particular operation (e.g., selecting a specific entry from a menu of operations). Conventional input devices, however, can be quite unfriendly. They can include multiple buttons and complex configurations, making correct use of these input devices challenging to the user. Unfortunately, actions performed on an input device generally do not correspond in any intuitive sense to the resulting changes on, for example, a screen display controlled by the device. Input devices can also be lost, and the frequent experience of searching for misplaced devices has become a frustrating staple of modern life.
Touch screens implemented directly on user-controlled devices have obviated the need for separate input devices. A touch screen detects the presence and location of a “touch” performed by a user's finger or other object on the display screen, enabling the user to enter a desired input by simply touching the proper area of a screen. Unfortunately, touch screens are impractical for many applications (e.g., large entertainment devices, devices that the user views from a distance, etc.). Therefore, there is a need for improved touch-free mechanisms that enable users to interact with devices and/or applications.
Aspects of the systems and methods described herein provide for improved image-based machine interactivity and/or communication by interpreting the position and/or motion of an object (including objects having one or more articulating members, e.g., hands, but more generally humans and/or animals and/or machines). Among other aspects, implementations can enable automatically (e.g., programmatically) to determine a correct way to interpret inputs detected from positional information (e.g., position, volume, and/or surface characteristics) and/or motion information (e.g., translation, rotation, and/or other structural change) of a portion of a hand or other detectable object moving in free-space. In some implementations, this is based upon a zone determined from the hand's (or other object's) position. Inputs can be interpreted from one or a sequence of images in conjunction with receiving input, commands, communications and/or other user-machine interfacing, gathering information about objects, events and/or actions existing or occurring within an area being explored, monitored, or controlled, and/or combinations thereof.
According to one aspect, therefore, a method implementation for processing an input includes detecting a portion of a hand and/or other detectable object in a region of space. The method further includes determining a zone corresponding to the region of space in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected. Also, the method can include determining from the zone a correct way to interpret inputs made by a position, shape or a motion of the portion of the hand or other detectable object.
Although one advantage provided by an implementation of the disclosed technology is the ability to dispense with the need for a physical touch screen, some implementations of the disclosed technology replicate the user experience of a touch screen in free-space. Most simply, the user's movements in a spatial region can be monitored and a plane computationally defined relative to the user's movements. This approach frees the user from having to gesture relative to a fixed plane in space; rather, the user moves his hands and/or fingers, for example, relative to an imagined plane that feels natural to him, as if attempting to manipulate a touch screen that controls a viewed display. Some implementations of the disclosed technology sense the user's movements and reconstruct the approximate location of the plane, and interpret the user's gestures relative thereto. For example, a system implementation may not react until the user has reached or broken the virtual plane that the system has defined. The dynamic relationship between the user's gestures and the plane can be mapped to any desired response on, for example, the display viewed by the user. In some implementations, the user's movements against the virtual plane drive a rendering system that draws on the display the trajectories traced by the user in space. The system can map user gestures that penetrate the plane to a parameter such as pressure—for example, drawing a thicker line the more the user's movements take place beyond the plane, as if the user were pressing on a touch screen. Of course, because the user's movements are necessarily not precise, implementations of the disclosed technology can computationally discriminate between gestures that, while not perfectly aligned with the plane, manifest an intention to provide a touch signal on the plane to draw or control something, as opposed to gestures that represent an attempt to withdraw from the plane or to penetrate it. Some implementations define the plane with a spatial thickness, and in certain implementations that thickness is altered based on analysis of the user's movements—in effect, the plane is personalized to the user based on her particular style of interaction therewith, which depends on the user's motor control and hand-eye coordination, among other factors. This personalization can be dynamic, i.e., revised as more user movements are detected, since it can change even within a session. Parameters specifying the plane's thickness can be associated with the particular user, e.g., stored in the user's record in a database of users.
The plane of interaction is not only subjective to the user but can shift as the user changes position (e.g., leans back) or simply because the plane is in the user's mind rather than visible in space. Implementations of the disclosed technology can therefore be configured to tolerate variation in the user's perception of the plane's location in space. For example, the computationally defined location of the plane can “follow” the user's gestures as if tethered to the user's fingers by a string, moving toward the user as her gestures retreat from a previous average location; gestural movements beyond this revised location are interpreted as penetrative.
Techniques for determining positional, shape and/or motion information about an object are described in further detail in co-pending U.S. Ser. Nos. 13/414,485, filed Mar. 7, 2012, and U.S. Ser. No. 13/742,953, filed Jan. 16, 2013, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if reproduced verbatim beginning here.
Advantageously, some implementations can provide for improved interface with computing and/or other machinery than would be possible with heretofore known techniques. In some implementations, a richer human-machine interface experience can be provided. The following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings will provide a better understanding of the nature and advantages provided for by implementations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, with an emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the technology disclosed. In the following description, various implementations of the technology disclosed are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
Implementations described herein with reference to examples can provide for automatically (e.g., programmatically) determining a correct way to interpret inputs detected from positional information (e.g., position, volume, shape, and/or surface characteristics) and/or motion information (e.g., translation, rotation, and/or other structural change) of a portion of a hand or other detectable object based upon a zone determined from the hand's (or other object's) position. Inputs can be interpreted from one or a sequence of images in conjunction with receiving input, commands, communications and/or other user-machine interfacing, gathering information about objects, events and/or actions existing or occurring within an area being explored, monitored, or controlled, and/or combinations thereof. In particular, inputs can be interpreted, for example, based on their detection within one of a plurality of spatially defined zones, based on the relationship between the gesture and a virtual plane defined in the monitored space, and/or both—i.e., a different plane can be defined within each of the zones, so that the perceived “touch” responsiveness depends on zone-specific plane parameters.
As used herein, a given signal, event or value is “based on” a predecessor signal, event or value of the predecessor signal, event or value influenced by the given signal, event or value. If there is an intervening processing element, step or time period, the given signal, event or value can still be “based on” the predecessor signal, event or value. If the intervening processing element or step combines more than one signal, event or value, the signal output of the processing element or step is considered “based on” each of the signal, event or value inputs. If the given signal, event or value is the same as the predecessor signal, event or value, this is merely a degenerate case in which the given signal, event or value is still considered to be “based on” the predecessor signal, event or value. “Responsiveness” and/or “dependency” of a given signal, event or value upon another signal, event or value is defined similarly.
As used herein, the “identification” of an item of information does not necessarily require the direct specification of that item of information. Information can be “identified” in a field by simply referring to the actual information through one or more layers of indirection, or by identifying one or more items of different information which are together sufficient to determine the actual item of information. In addition, the term “specify” is used herein to mean the same as “identify.”
Reference throughout this specification to “one example,” “an example,” “one implementation,” “an implementation,” “one implementation,” or “an implementation” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one example of the disclosed technology. Thus, the occurrences of the phrases “in one example,” “in an example,” “in one implementation,” “in an implementation,” “one implementation,” or “an implementation” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, routines, steps, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more examples of the technology. The headings provided herein are for convenience only and are not intended to limit or interpret the scope or meaning of the claimed technology.
Motion sensing device 200a is capable of detecting position as well as motion of hands and/or portions of hands and/or other detectable objects (e.g., a pen, a pencil, a stylus, a paintbrush, an eraser, other tools, and/or a combination thereof), within a region of space 110a from which it is convenient for a user to interact with system 100a. Region 110a can be situated in front of, nearby, and/or surrounding system 100a. While
Tower 102a and/or position and motion sensing device 200a and/or other elements of system 100a can implement functionality to logically partition region 110a into a plurality of zones (112a-1, 112a-2, 114a, 116a of
Painting Program Example
In one example, objects or motions detected within zone 112a-1 and/or zone 112a-2 (
Zone 114a can be used as, for example, a “ready” area in which objects or motion inputs are interpreted as non-committed content inputs and/or as modifiers for inputs made in one or more of other zones. In the paint program example, zone 114a can be a “hover area” in which the point of the virtual “brush” (or pen, pencil, eraser, stylus, paintbrush or other-tool) is not in contact with the virtual “canvas”; rather, the virtual brush is “hovering” above the virtual canvas. The paint program can respond to objects and/or motion inputs in various ways—for example, the cursor color can change to reflect that the program is in a hover mode. Menu/tool icons, if displayed, can be hidden to indicate the system is ready to receive content inputs. Various guidelines (or guide points, cross-hairs, or the like) can be made to appear on the screen to represent where the virtual brush can contact the virtual canvas based upon the object and/or motion detected. A projected contact point and/or target area indicated by the position of a tool for example can be highlighted with color change, increased magnification (i.e., “zoom in”), and/or dotted (or dashed) lines, and/or combinations thereof can assist a user.
Zone 116a can serve as a content input area in which objects or motion inputs are interpreted as content. In the paint program example, zone 116a can serve as a “painting area” in which the point of the virtual brush (or pen, pencil, eraser, stylus, paintbrush or other virtualized tool) is in contact with the virtual “canvas” so as to mark the canvas. Accordingly, the paint program can receive content input(s) in zone 116a in the form of objects and/or motions, and reflect the input(s) as the results of a user “painting” on the virtual canvas with the virtual brush. Various indicators (e.g., the cursor or other contact indicator) can change color and/or shape to signify to the user that “contact” between tool and canvas has occurred. Further, input(s) detected as objects or motions can be interpreted as actions of the virtual brush that can be reflected onto the virtual canvas as brush strokes, lines, marks, shading, and/or combinations thereof.
In an implementation, substantially contemporaneous inputs of objects and/or motion in two or more zones can indicate to system 100a that the inputs should be interpreted together. For example, system 100a can detect input(s) of content made by a virtual brush in zone 116a contemporaneous with inputs of commands in zone 112a-1 and/or zone 112a-2. Accordingly, the user can employ this mechanism to alter the characteristics (e.g., color, line width, brush stroke, darkness, etc.) of the content input as the content input is being made.
While illustrated with examples using adjacent zones for ease of illustration, there is no special need for zones to touch one another; thus in implementations zones can be contiguous, dis-contiguous or combinations thereof. In some implementations, inter-zone spaces can be advantageously interposed between zones to facilitate application specific purposes. Further, as illustrated by zone 112a-1 and zone 112a-2, zones need not be contiguous. In other words, system 100a can treat inputs made in either zone 112a-1 or zone 112a-2 equivalently, or similarly, thereby providing the ability to some implementations to accommodate “handedness” of users.
Additional Zone Maps
A position and motion sensing device 200b (e.g., 200b-1, 200b-2 and/or 200b-3) provides for receiving non-tactile inputs based upon detected position(s) and/or motion(s) made by a hand 14 and/or any other detectable object. Position and motion sensing device 200b can be embodied as a stand-alone entity 200b-1 or integrated directly into display device 104b as integrated device 200b-2 and/or keyboard 106b as integrated device 200b-3. While
As shown in
In summary, the above painting program example demonstrates the concept of zones: determining from a zone a correct way to interpret inputs; using an image capturing system; and analyzing captured images to detect at least one edge of the object, using that information to determine an associated position and/or motion.
A user draws with their finger as a virtual brush, applying marks to a virtual canvas after selecting a paint color and brush thickness in a Menu/Tool selection zone. The finger position and/or motion in space define the position and/or motion of the brush. A motion sensor provides input to an imaging analysis system that detects at least one edge to determine the zone, and the user selects a modifier to specify the width of the brush stroke. The system interprets that the detected finger is now a red paint brush drawing an apple onto the canvas, with a brush stroke width specified by the ‘modifier’ input zone. The user pauses with their finger paintbrush hovering above the virtual canvas, in a ‘hover’ zone, to admire the apple painting before waving their finger in midair to paint a bite in the apple image. When the artist steps back to view their canvas from an alternate perspective, the application can determine the new location of the finger-turned-paintbrush and will add that additional region of space to a set of zones in which the brush object can be found.
Control Object Tracking
Further, the position and shape of the object can be determined based on the locations of its edges in time-correlated images from two different cameras, and motion (including articulation) of the object can be determined from analysis of successive pairs of images. Examples of techniques that can be used to determine an object's position, shape and motion based on locations of edges of the object are described in co-pending U.S. Ser. No. 13/414,485, filed Mar. 7, 2012, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Those skilled in the art with access to the present disclosure will recognize that other techniques for determining position, shape and motion of an object based on information about the location of edges of the object can also be used.
In accordance with the '485 application, an object's motion and/or position is reconstructed using small amounts of information. For example, an outline of an object's shape, or silhouette, as seen from a particular vantage point can be used to define tangent lines to the object from that vantage point in various planes, referred to herein as “slices.” Using as few as two different vantage points, four (or more) tangent lines from the vantage points to the object can be obtained in a given slice. From these four (or more) tangent lines, it is possible to determine the position of the object in the slice and to approximate its cross-section in the slice, e.g., using one or more ellipses or other simple closed curves. As another example, locations of points on an object's surface in a particular slice can be determined directly (e.g., using a time-of-flight camera), and the position and shape of a cross-section of the object in the slice can be approximated by fitting an ellipse or other simple closed curve to the points. Positions and cross-sections determined for different slices can be correlated to construct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the object, including its position and shape. A succession of images can be analyzed using the same technique to model motion of the object. Motion of a complex object that has multiple separately articulating members (e.g., a human hand) can be modeled using these techniques.
More particularly, an ellipse in the xy plane can be characterized by five parameters: the x and y coordinates of the center (xC, yC), the semi-major axis, the semi-minor axis, and a rotation angle (e.g., the angle of the semi-major axis relative to the x axis). With only four tangents, the ellipse is underdetermined. However, an efficient process for estimating the ellipse in spite of this fact involves making an initial working assumption (or “guess”) as to one of the parameters and revisiting the assumption as additional information is gathered during the analysis. This additional information can include, for example, physical constraints based on properties of the cameras and/or the object. In some circumstances, more than four tangents to an object can be available for some or all of the slices, e.g., because more than two vantage points are available. An elliptical cross-section can still be determined, and the process in some instances is somewhat simplified as there is no need to assume a parameter value. In some instances, the additional tangents can create additional complexity. In some circumstances, fewer than four tangents to an object can be available for some or all of the slices, e.g., because an edge of the object is out of range of the field of view of one camera or because an edge was not detected. A slice with three tangents can be analyzed. For example, using two parameters from an ellipse fit to an adjacent slice (e.g., a slice that had at least four tangents), the system of equations for the ellipse and three tangents is sufficiently determined that it can be solved. As another option, a circle can be fit to the three tangents; defining a circle in a plane requires only three parameters (the center coordinates and the radius), so three tangents suffice to fit a circle. Slices with fewer than three tangents can be discarded or combined with adjacent slices.
One approach to determine geometrically whether an object corresponds to an object of interest includes is to look for continuous volumes of ellipses that define an object and discard object segments geometrically inconsistent with the ellipse-based definition of the object—e.g., segments that are too cylindrical or too straight or too thin or too small or too far away—and discarding these. If a sufficient number of ellipses remain to characterize the object and it conforms to the object of interest, it is so identified, and can be tracked from frame to frame.
In some implementations, each of a number of slices is analyzed separately to determine the size and location of an elliptical cross-section of the object in that slice. This provides an initial 3D model (specifically, a stack of elliptical cross-sections), which can be refined by correlating the cross-sections across different slices. For example, it is expected that an object's surface will have continuity, and discontinuous ellipses can accordingly be discounted. Further refinement can be obtained by correlating the 3D model with itself across time, e.g., based on expectations related to continuity in motion and deformation.
Flow Diagrams of Zone Interpretation
Objects can be detected in a variety of ways, but in an implementation and by way of example,
Edge detection analysis can be achieved by various algorithms and/or mechanisms. For example,
With renewed reference to
Alternatively, the object can be assigned to a preferred or default zone that can be selected from the set of zones built in action 334 employing processing such as illustrated in
Preferred zone determination can be achieved by various algorithms and/or mechanisms. For example, the flow diagram 336a of
In an alternative implementation, rule-based algorithms and/or mechanisms can select the first preferred zone. For example, with reference to the flow diagram 336b shown in
Zone presence determination can be achieved by various algorithms and/or mechanisms. For example,
A correct way to interpret inputs made by a position or a motion of the portion of the hand or other detectable object can be determined from the zone (action 303). In an implementation and by way of example,
Alternatively, or in addition, in some implementations, with reference to
The painting program example demonstrates the concept of command, content, modifier and hover zones. The user's finger position is interpreted as a command input when the physical location is in the Menu/Tool selection zone, and as content input when the physical location is in the canvas zone. After choosing the paint brush, a modifier zone makes it possible to choose a brush width for the brush. When the artist is not actively putting virtual paint on their virtual canvas they can hover above the virtual canvas, ready to add a brush stroke to the canvas
Functional Models Implementing Features
Imaging-system maintenance engine 403 provides for managing imaging device(s), light source(s), and so forth as described in the '485 application. Imaging device(s) can be calibrated and fields of view can be defined and/or determined, for example. Application(s)/OS integration maintenance engine 404 provides for managing interfacing between the image-analysis system, as described in the '485 application, and application(s) making use of gestural input and/or the operating system(s) (OS). User(s) and/or program(s) can add, delete and update device driver(s) and/or definitions to match hardware components of the imaging system. A zone maintenance engine 406 provides for obtaining and maintaining parameters for zones, editing zone boundaries, editing rules for interpreting object(s) and/or motion(s) within zone(s). In variable-zone implementations, variable zone definition(s), parameter(s) can be selected and/or changed via the zone maintenance engine 406.
An interpretation rules maintenance engine 408 provides for obtaining, selecting, changing, and/or deleting rule(s) and/or parameter(s) governing zone-specific gesture interpretation (e.g., if the zone is a content-input zone, then gestures are interpreted as providing content; if the zone is a command zone, then gestures are interpreted as commands). A zone-object presence testing engine 410 provides for testing for the presence of object(s) and/or motion(s) within each zone. A gesture-interpretation engine 411 provides for interpreting object(s) and/or motion(s) as gesture(s). As explained in U.S. Ser. No. 61/752,725, filed Jan. 15, 2013, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if reproduced verbatim beginning here, the task of gesture interpretation can be performed by the imaging system, by an application utilizing gestural input, or by some combination depending on how computational resources are allocated. Accordingly, engine 411 can interpret gestures or perform some more limited form of processing, e.g., vectorizing a gesture for higher-level interpretation by an application. In environments where both the imaging system and a running application can interpret gestures, priority can be given to one system or the other based on, for example, a hierarchical priority level associated with particular gestures. For example, in one implementation, the imaging system can have priority for user-defined gestures while the application can have priority for application-defined gestures; accordingly, gesture interpretation can be system-dependent as specified by rules defined, for example, in a gesture interpretation rules-maintenance engine 412. A gesture settings/filtering engine 413 provides for maintaining settings useful in recognizing gestures. The various rules and parameters utilized by the engines described above can be maintained in one or more databases, in other implementations.
As explained above, zone-based object or gesture detection can be used, for example, to determine the proper interpretation of the user's movements. Another approach to gesture interpretation based on spatial position extends the touch-screen paradigm to free-space that is, the user performs gestures in 3D space as if controlling a system using a touch screen, and systems and methods in accordance herewith respond as if a touch screen has been operated. This interface approach involves establishing the user's apparent perception of the (imagined) touch screen's location in space and her gestural intentions relative thereto, e.g., whether the user intends to pass a finger lightly over the screen surface, to press with more force against it, or to withdraw from the screen altogether to, for example, simply put her hand down without intending a gesture, to make a pinching or finger-spreading gesture, etc. This “virtual touch screen” approach can be used in conjunction with zones such that responsiveness and/or mapping of gestures to actions can be specific to each zone, or it can be implemented independently of zone-based sensing, in other implementations.
In one implementation, a spatial region can be monitored and a plane in the monitored space can be computationally defined. The user's movements are tracked relative to this spatially defined (virtual) plane, which can be defined implicitly or explicitly. In one implicit approach, the user moves his hands and/or fingers relative to an imagined plane that feels natural to him, as if attempting to manipulate a touch screen that controls a viewed display. The imaging system senses the user's movements and the gesture-interpretation engine 411 reconstructs, and computationally defines, the approximate location of the plane in 3D space based on the average depth of the user's gestures; gesture-interpretation engine 411 thereupon interprets the user's subsequent gestures relative to the defined plane. In one explicit approach, the system is trained to the user, who is prompted to, for example, “draw” a series of circles, lines and dots on an imagined plane. These gestures explicitly indicate the user's perception of the plane's location in 3D space.
The plane's location and orientation can be defined by Euclidean geometry in a 3D coordinate system associated with the monitored space; for example, the plane can be defined by a point and a normal vector, by a point and two vectors lying on the plane, etc. In some implementations, the plane is constrained to the use environment; for example, it can be assumed or required to be parallel to the display, or parallel to the display on one axis (e.g., the plane can tilt toward or away from the screen and/or rotate from side to side around a vertical axis). In other implementations, the plane is arbitrarily defined in space. Furthermore, the plane need not be a flat, two-dimensional construct; in some implementations, particularly for large virtual working surfaces, the plane can be curved in space to conform to a user's range of movements.
Since the user's attempts to draw on an imagined plane will conform only approximately to the plane as computationally defined, the plane can have a spatial thickness associated therewith. As a result, gestures (or the spatial average of gestures) occurring along spatial coordinates within the plane's defined thickness will be treated as gestures occurring on the plane. In certain implementations, the defined thickness is set and/or altered based on analysis of the user's movements—in effect, the plane is personalized to the user based on analysis of her gestures, which can occur on an ongoing basis. In the latter case, personalization is dynamic, i.e., revised as more user movements are detected. For example, the trajectories of user gestures can be characterized as arcs or vectors in 3D, and a maximum depth extent (i.e., gestural movement along the axis extending from the user to the display) used to define the thickness of the plane. Parameters specifying the plane's thickness can be associated with the particular user, e.g., stored in the user's record in a database of users. Indeed, these depth patterns can be uniquely enough associated with a given user as to be identifying; for example, the user can be asked to authenticate herself by signing her name in 3D space, and the “signature” pattern can be analyzed for authenticity in three dimensions against stored signature parameters.
The user can interact with the plane using his finger, hand, a held object, or other appendage. In some implementations, fingers are sensed and identified, and separate planes are defined for each finger. This affords a more 3D interactive experience, allowing the user to, for example, grip and manipulate a virtual joystick; alternatively or in addition, it can allow for more precise recognition of common 2D display-control gestures such as pinching (to zoom in), spreading (to zoom out), and rotation.
Systems and methods in accordance with the disclosed technology may not react until the user has reached or broken the virtual plane as spatially defined; that is, so long as the user's movements—i.e., movements of the user's hand, fingers or other object being tracked—occur closer to the user than the virtual plane (or, more typically, the closest surface of the 3D volume that defines the “plane”), they are not mapped to an action. When the user's gesture occurs on the plane, it can be mapped to any desired response on the display viewed by the user. For example, gesture-interpretation engine 411 can interpret the user's movements against the virtual plane to drive a rendering system that draws on the display the trajectories traced by the user in space. Gesture-interpretation engine 411 can map user gestures that penetrate the virtual plane to pressure—for example, causing the rendering system to draw a thicker line the more the user's movements take place beyond the plane (i.e., closer to the display), as if the user were pressing on a touch screen. Gesture-interpretation engine 411 can be further configured to adjust gesture-recognition sensitivity based on the speed of the user's movements.
The plane of interaction may not only vary in thickness depending on the user's movement patterns, but can shift in space as, for example, the user changes position (e.g., leans back) or simply due to changing user perceptions. Implementations of the disclosed technology can therefore cause the computationally defined plane to “follow” the user's gestures as if tethered to the gesturing appendage or object by a string—moving toward the user as the user's gestures retreat from a previous average location but interpreting gestural movements beyond this revised plane location as penetrative. In such implementations, the system can be configured such that only a large movement “through” the plane, or persistent gestures at a new location closer to the display, will be interpreted as an effort to move the plane back toward the display.
Referring to
Cameras 502, 504 are preferably capable of capturing video images (i.e., successive image frames at a constant rate of at least 15 frames per second); although no particular frame rate is required. The capabilities of cameras 502, 504 are not critical to the technology disclosed, and the cameras can vary as to frame rate, image resolution (e.g., pixels per image), color or intensity resolution (e.g., number of bits of intensity data per pixel), focal length of lenses, depth of field, etc. In general, for a particular application, any cameras capable of focusing on objects within a spatial volume of interest can be used. For instance, to capture motion of the hand of an otherwise stationary person, the volume of interest can be defined as a cube approximately one meter on a side.
In some implementations, the illustrated system 500A includes one or more sources 508, 510, which can be disposed to either side of cameras 502, 504, and are controlled by image-analysis system 506. In one implementation, the sources 508, 510 are light sources. For example, the light sources can be infrared light sources, e.g., infrared light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and cameras 502, 504 can be sensitive to infrared light. Use of infrared light can allow the gesture-recognition system 500A to operate under a broad range of lighting conditions and can avoid various inconveniences or distractions that may be associated with directing visible light into the region where the person is moving. However, a particular wavelength or region of the electromagnetic spectrum can be required. In one implementation, filters 520, 522 are placed in front of cameras 502, 504 to filter out visible light so that only infrared light is registered in the images captured by cameras 502, 504. In another implementation, the sources 508, 510 are sonic sources providing sonic energy appropriate to one or more sonic sensors (not shown in
It should be stressed that the arrangement shown in
In operation, light sources 508, 510 are arranged to illuminate a region of interest 512 that includes a control object portion 514 (in this example, a hand) that may optionally hold a tool or other object of interest and cameras 502, 504 are oriented toward the region 512 to capture video images of the hand 514. In some implementations, the operation of light sources 508, 510 and cameras 502, 504 is controlled by the image-analysis system 506, which can be, e.g., a computer system, control logic implemented in hardware and/or software or combinations thereof. Based on the captured images, image-analysis system 506 determines the position and/or motion of object 514.
The computing environment can also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. For example, a hard disk drive can read or write to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media. A magnetic disk drive can read from or write to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk, and an optical disk drive can read from or write to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like. The storage media are typically connected to the system bus through a removable or non-removable memory interface.
Processor 532 can be a general-purpose microprocessor, but depending on implementation can alternatively be a microcontroller, peripheral integrated circuit element, a CSIC (customer-specific integrated circuit), an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit), a logic circuit, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device such as an FPGA (field-programmable gate array), a PLD (programmable logic device), a PLA (programmable logic array), an RFID processor, smart chip, or any other device or arrangement of devices that is capable of implementing the actions of the processes of the technology disclosed.
Image interface 536 can include hardware and/or software that enables communication between computer system 500B and cameras such as cameras 502, 504 shown in
Image interface 536 can also include controllers 547, 549, to which light sources (e.g., light sources 508, 510) can be connected. In some implementations, controllers 547, 549 provide operating current to the light sources, e.g., in response to instructions from processor 532 executing mocap program 544. In other implementations, the light sources can draw operating current from an external power supply, and controllers 547, 549 can generate control signals for the light sources, e.g., instructing the light sources to be turned on or off or changing the brightness. In some implementations, a single controller can be used to control multiple light sources.
Instructions defining mocap program 544 are stored in memory 534, and these instructions, when executed, perform motion-capture analysis on images supplied from cameras connected to image interface 536. In one implementation, mocap program 544 includes various modules, such as an object detection module 552, an object analysis module 554, and a gesture-recognition module 556. Object detection module 552 can analyze images (e.g., images captured via image interface 536) to detect edges of an object therein and/or other information about the object's location. Object analysis module 554 can analyze the object information provided by object detection module 552 to determine the 3D position and/or motion of the object (e.g., a user's hand). Examples of operations that can be implemented in code modules of mocap program 544 are described below. Memory 534 can also include other information and/or code modules used by mocap program 544 such as an application platform 566 that allows a user to interact with the mocap program 544 using different applications like application 1 (App1), application 2 (App2), and application N (AppN).
Display 538, speakers 539, keyboard 540, and mouse 541 can be used to facilitate user interaction with computer system 500B. In some implementations, results of gesture capture using image interface 536 and mocap program 544 can be interpreted as user input. For example, a user can perform hand gestures that are analyzed using mocap program 544, and the results of this analysis can be interpreted as an instruction to some other program executing on processor 532 (e.g., a web browser, word processor, or other application). Thus, by way of illustration, a user might use upward or downward swiping gestures to “scroll” a webpage currently displayed on display 538, to use rotating gestures to increase or decrease the volume of audio output from speakers 539, and so on.
It will be appreciated that computer system 500B is illustrative and that variations and modifications are possible. Computer systems can be implemented in a variety of form factors, including server systems, desktop systems, laptop systems, tablets, smart phones or personal digital assistants, wearable devices, e.g., goggles, head mounted displays (HMDs), wrist computers, and so on. A particular implementation can include other functionality not described herein, e.g., wired and/or wireless network interfaces, media playing and/or recording capability, etc. In some implementations, one or more cameras can be built into the computer or other device into which the sensor is imbedded rather than being supplied as separate components. Further, an image analyzer can be implemented using only a subset of computer system components (e.g., as a processor executing program code, an ASIC, or a fixed-function digital signal processor, with suitable I/O interfaces to receive image data and output analysis results).
While computer system 500B is described herein with reference to particular blocks, it is to be understood that the blocks are defined for convenience of description and are not intended to imply a particular physical arrangement of component parts. Further, the blocks need not correspond to physically distinct components. To the extent that physically distinct components are used, connections between components (e.g., for data communication) can be wired and/or wireless as desired.
With reference to
In one implementation, the gesture-recognition module 556 compares the detected gesture to a library of gestures electronically stored as records in a database, which is implemented in the image-analysis system 506, the electronic device, or on an external storage system. (As used herein, the term “electronically stored” includes storage in volatile or nonvolatile storage, the latter including disks, Flash memory, etc., and extends to any computationally addressable storage media (including, for example, optical storage).) For example, gestures can be stored as vectors, i.e., mathematically specified spatial trajectories, and the gesture record can have a field specifying the relevant part of the user's body making the gesture; thus, similar trajectories executed by a user's hand and head can be stored in the database as different gestures so that an application can interpret them differently.
Particular Implementations
In one implementation, a method is described that processes an input, including detecting a portion of a hand or other detectable object (collectively “object” or “detectable object”) in a 3D sensor space. This includes determining a zone from among multiple zones within the of 3D sensor space in which the portion of the detectable object was detected; and determining from the zone a correct way to interpret inputs detected by the 3D sensor as a position or a motion of the portion of the hand or other detectable object.
This method and other implementations of the technology disclosed can include one or more of the following features and/or features described in connection with additional methods disclosed. In the interest of conciseness, the combinations of features disclosed in this application are not individually enumerated and are not repeated with each base set of features. The reader will understand how features identified as implementations in this section can readily be combined with sets of base features
In some implementations, the method is enhanced by detecting the portion of a hand or other detectable object in the 3D sensor space and includes detecting at least one of a brush, a pen, a pencil, a stylus, a paintbrush, or an eraser.
This method can include determining the zone in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected; capturing at least one image using an imaging analysis system, and analyzing the at least one captured image to detect at least one edge of the object based on changes in at least one parameter of the at least one image. It can further include determining a position and/or motion associated with the object based upon the at least one edge.
In some implementations, the method is enhanced by analyzing the parameter includes analyzing the at least one captured image for a change in pixel brightness.
The analyzing step can include comparing the brightness of at least two pixels to a threshold; and the process of detecting a transition in brightness from below the threshold to above the threshold across adjacent pixels.
The analyzing step can include comparing successive images captured without and with illumination by one or more light source; and detecting a transition in brightness from a low level to a high level across the successive images of individual pixels.
This method can be enhanced by determining from the zone in which the detectable object appears a correct way to interpret position or motion inputs. This feature can include interpreting a position or a motion as a command input when the detectable object is in a command input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a content input when the detectable object is in a content input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a modifier input modifying a concurrent input when the detectable object is in a modifier input zone; and/or interpreting a position or a motion as being ready to make an input when the detectable object is in a hover zone.
In some implementations, a method includes of interpreting motion of the hand or other detectable object as one or more gestures; and the process of determining from the one or more gestures an input to at least one of (i) an application or (ii) an operating system.
The method implementations described herein also can be practiced as a system or device with hardware running software capable of implementing the method and any combination of features. Example systems are further described below. Other implementations can include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions executable by a processor to perform any of the methods described above or that, when combined with suitable hardware, produce any of the systems devices described.
In article of manufacture implementations, computer programs incorporating various features of the disclosed technology can be encoded on various computer readable storage media; suitable media include magnetic disk or tape, optical storage media such as compact disk (CD) or DVD (digital versatile disk), flash memory, and any other non-transitory medium capable of holding data in a computer-readable form. Computer-readable storage media encoded with the program code can be packaged with a compatible device or provided separately from other devices. In addition program code can be encoded and transmitted via wired, optical, and/or wireless networks conforming to a variety of protocols, including the Internet, thereby allowing distribution, e.g., via Internet download and/or provided on-demand as web-services. In this application, computer-readable storage media are not meant to include transitory signals subject to the Federal Circuit rule of In re Nuijten.
In another implementation, a machine-implemented method is described that combines several features described above. This method processes an input, detecting a portion of a hand or other detectable object in a 3D sensor space. This method includes determining a zone corresponding to the 3D sensor space in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected, by capturing an image using an imaging analysis system and analyzing the captured image to detect one or more edges of the object based on changes in at least one image parameter including brightness, by comparing the brightness of at least two pixels to a threshold; and detecting a transition in brightness from a low level to a high level across adjacent pixels.
This method implementation further includes determining a position and/or motion of the object based upon the one or more edges, by selecting a zone to test for presence of the object; determining whether the object is within the selected zone. The method includes adding the zone to a set of zones in which the object can be found when the object is determined to be within the selected zone.
This implementation further includes determining from the zone in which the detectable object appears a correct way to interpret position or motion inputs. This includes interpreting a position or a motion as a command input when the detectable object is in a command input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a content input when the detectable object is in a content input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a modifier input modifying a concurrent input when the detectable object is in a modifier input zone; and/or interpreting a position or a motion as being ready to make an input when the detectable object is in a hover zone.
This method can further include interpreting motion of the hand or other detectable object as one or more gestures can result in determining from the one or more gestures an input to at least one of (i) an application or (ii) an operating system.
In another implementation, a machine-implemented method for processing an input is described that combines many of the features separately described above. This method includes detecting a portion of a hand or other detectable object in a 3D sensor space. The method includes determining a zone corresponding to the 3D sensor space in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected, by capturing an image using an imaging analysis system. The method includes analyzing the captured image to detect one or more edges of the object based on changes in at least one image parameter including brightness, by comparing the brightness of at least two pixels to a threshold and detecting a transition in brightness from a low level to a high level across adjacent pixels and determining position and/or motion of the object based upon the one or more edges. It includes selecting a zone to test for presence of the object, determining whether the object is within the selected zone, and adding the zone to a set of zones in which the object can be found when the object is determined to be within the selected zone.
This overall this method includes determining from the zone in which the detectable object appears a correct way to interpret position or motion inputs. This feature can include interpreting a position or a motion as a command input when the detectable object is in a command input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a content input when the detectable object is in a content input zone; interpreting a position or a motion as a modifier input modifying a concurrent input when the detectable object is in a modifier input zone; and interpreting a position or a motion as being ready to make an input when the detectable object is in a hover zone.
In another implementation, a system is described that includes an image-capture device with at least one camera and an image analyzer coupled to the camera. The image analyzer detects a portion of a hand or other detectable object in a 3D sensor space, determines a zone corresponding to the 3D sensor space in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected, and determines from the zone a correct way to interpret inputs made by a position or a motion of the portion of the hand or other detectable object.
The system implementation above can also be described as an imaging device. The imaging device includes an image-capture device including at least one camera and an interface to an image analyzer. The image analyzer detects a portion of a hand or other detectable object in a 3D sensor space and determines a zone from among multiple zones within the of 3D sensor space in which the portion of the hand or other detectable object was detected. The image analyzer determines from the zone a correct way to interpret inputs detected by the 3D sensor as a position or a motion of the portion of the hand or other detectable object.
These system and device implementations can further be enhanced by practicing any of the method features described above or in the claims.
Another implementation describes a machine-implemented method that processes position or gesture input, detecting a portion of a hand or other detectable object in a 3D sensor space. This method includes computationally defining a plane within the 3D sensor space and detecting interaction with the defined plane. The method includes detecting a gesture made by the hand or other detectable object, comparing a location of the gesture with a location of the defined plane, and based at least in part on the comparison, interpreting the gesture.
This implementation can be practiced with any of the features described above or in the claims and with any of the following features.
The gesture can be interpreted as a touch gesture if it occurs at a spatial location corresponding to or beyond a location of the defined plane.
The interpreted gesture can be mapped to an action on a display.
A gesture or portion thereof occurring beyond the location of the defined plane can be interpreted as a penetrative gesture.
Computationally defining the plane can include monitoring movements of the detected object to establish an average working surface.
The plane can be flat. The so-called plane can be curved or it can have a thickness.
The can further include adjusting the location of the plane based on movements of the detected object or interactions between the detected object and virtual objects.
This additional method can be implemented as a system, device, or computer-readable storage media, as described above.
Thus, although the disclosed technology has been described with respect to specific implementations, it will be appreciated that the disclosed technology is intended to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the following claims. The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms and expressions of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof. In addition, having described certain implementations of the technology disclosed, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other implementations incorporating the concepts disclosed herein can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the technology disclosed. Accordingly, the described implementations are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/262,691, titled “NON-TACTILE INTERFACE SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, filed 25 Apr. 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,916,009, issued 13 Mar. 2018 which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/816,487, titled “NON-TACTILE INTERFACE SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” filed 26 Apr. 2013. The provisional application is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4175862 | DiMatteo et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4879659 | Bowlin et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 5134661 | Reinsch | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5282067 | Liu | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5454043 | Freeman | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5574511 | Yang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581276 | Cipolla et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594469 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5742263 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5900863 | Numazaki | May 1999 | A |
| 6002808 | Freeman | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6031661 | Tanaami | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6147678 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154558 | Hsieh | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6181343 | Lyons | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184926 | Khosravi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195104 | Lyons | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6204852 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6252598 | Segen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6263091 | Jain et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6493041 | Hanko et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6498628 | Iwamura | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6603867 | Sugino et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6629065 | Gadh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6661918 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6804656 | Rosenfeld et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6819796 | Hong et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6901170 | Terada et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6919880 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6950534 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6993157 | Oue et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7215828 | Luo | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7259873 | Sikora et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7308112 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7340077 | Gokturk et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7519223 | Dehlin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7532206 | Morrison et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536032 | Bell | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542586 | Johnson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7598942 | Underkoffler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606417 | Steinberg et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7646372 | Marks et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7665041 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7692625 | Morrison et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7831932 | Josephsoon et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840031 | Albertson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7861188 | Josephsoon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7940885 | Stanton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7948493 | Klefenz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7971156 | Albertson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8064704 | Kim et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8085339 | Marks | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086971 | Radivojevic et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8111239 | Pryor et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8112719 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8213707 | Li et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8235529 | Raffle et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8244233 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8514221 | King et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8638989 | Holz | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8693731 | Holz et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8930852 | Chen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9056396 | Linnell | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9182812 | Ybanez Zepeda | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9389779 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9459697 | Bedikian et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9501152 | Bedikian et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 20020008211 | Kask | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020021287 | Tomasi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041327 | Hildreth et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105484 | Navab et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030053658 | Pavlidis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030053659 | Pavlidis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081141 | Mazzapica | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123703 | Pavlidis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152289 | Luo | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202697 | Simard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040125228 | Dougherty | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145809 | Brenner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212725 | Raskar | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050131607 | Breed | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168578 | Gobush | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236558 | Nabeshima et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060017807 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072105 | Wagner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210112 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290950 | Platt et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070042346 | Weller | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130547 | Boillot | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206719 | Suryanarayanan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211023 | Boillot | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238956 | Haras et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080056752 | Denton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064954 | Adams et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080106746 | Shpunt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080111710 | Boillot | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273764 | Scholl | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278589 | Thorn | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080304740 | Sun et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319356 | Cain et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090102840 | Li | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103780 | Nishihara et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090122146 | Zalewski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128564 | Okuno | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090217211 | Hildreth et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090257623 | Tang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274339 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2009 | A9 |
| 20090309710 | Kakinami | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001998 | Mandella et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100013662 | Stude | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023015 | Park | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100027845 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100046842 | Conwell | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100053164 | Imai et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058252 | Ko | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095206 | Kim | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118123 | Freedman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125815 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158372 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162165 | Addala et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199221 | Yeung et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201880 | Iwamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100219934 | Matsumoto | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222102 | Rodriguez | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100275159 | Matsubara et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277411 | Yee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100296698 | Lien et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100302357 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306712 | Snook et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100309097 | Raviv et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100321377 | Gay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110007072 | Khan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110026765 | Ivanich et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110057875 | Shigeta et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066984 | Li | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110080470 | Kuno et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093820 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107216 | Bi | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110115486 | Frohlich et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119640 | Berkes | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110134112 | Koh et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148875 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169726 | Holmdahl et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173574 | Clavin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181509 | Rautiainen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205151 | Newton et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213664 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110228978 | Chen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234840 | Klefenz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251896 | Impollonia | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267259 | Tidemand et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286676 | El Dokor | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289455 | Reville et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289456 | Reville et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110291925 | Israel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110291988 | Bamji et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296353 | Ahmed et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110299737 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110304650 | Campillo et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310007 | Margolis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120038637 | Marks | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120050157 | Latta et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065499 | Chono | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120068914 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113223 | Hilliges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120204133 | Guendelman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218263 | Meier et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120250936 | Holmgren | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120320080 | Giese et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130033483 | Im et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191911 | Dellinger et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130222233 | Park et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130222640 | Baek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239059 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257736 | Hou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130283213 | Guendelman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307935 | Rappel et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321265 | Bychkov et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140015831 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140055385 | Duheille | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140055396 | Aubauer et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140063055 | Osterhout et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140063060 | Maciocci et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095119 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098018 | Kim et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125813 | Holz | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140134733 | Wu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140139641 | Holz | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140157135 | Lee et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140177913 | Holz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201666 | Bedikian et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201689 | Bedikian et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140223385 | Ton | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140225918 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240215 | Tremblay | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249961 | Zagel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140307920 | Holz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140320408 | Zagorsek et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344762 | Grasset et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140369558 | Holz | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150054729 | Minnen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150084864 | Geiss et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150103004 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150227795 | Starner | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150293597 | Mishra et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150309629 | Amariutei et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150363070 | Katz | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1984236 | Jun 2007 | CN |
| 201332447 | Oct 2009 | CN |
| 101729808 | Jun 2010 | CN |
| 101930610 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 101951474 | Jan 2011 | CN |
| 102053702 | May 2011 | CN |
| 201859393 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102201121 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102236412 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 4201934 | Jul 1993 | DE |
| 102007015495 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 0999542 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1837665 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 2378488 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2006019526 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2009031939 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2009037594 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2011065652 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 1906960 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 101092909 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 2422878 | Jun 2011 | RU |
| 200844871 | Nov 2008 | TW |
| 1994026057 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| 2004114220 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2006020846 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2007137093 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2010032268 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010076622 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010148155 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011036618 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011044680 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011045789 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011119154 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012027422 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013109608 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013109609 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2015, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Response to Offfice Action dated Dec. 11, 2015, filed May 11, 2016, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Response to Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, filed Nov. 21, 2016, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Response to Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, filed Jun. 30, 2017, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2017, 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,493—Office Action dated May 9, 2016, 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,493—Response to May 9 Office Action filed Aug. 9, 2016, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,493—Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2016, 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Response to Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016 filed Jan. 31, 2017, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2017, 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/155,722—Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,817—Office Action, dated Sep. 28, 2015, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,730—Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,730—Response to Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2016, filed Feb. 4, 2016, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,730—Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2016, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/280,018—Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2016, 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/280,018—Replacement Response to Office Action, dated Feb. 12, 2016, filed Jun. 8, 2016, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/280,018—Response to Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2016, filed May 12, 2016, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/280,018—Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 7, 2016, 7 pages. |
| PCT/US2013/021713—International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 22, 2014, 13 pages, (WO 2013/109609). |
| PCT/US2013/021713—International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 11, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Wu, Y., et al., “Vision-Based Gesture Recognition: A Review,” Beckman Institute, Copyright 1999, pp. 103-115. |
| Arthington, et al., “Cross-section Reconstruction During Uniaxial Loading,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 20, No. 7, Jun. 10, 2009, Retrieved from the Internet: http:iopscience.iop.org/0957-0233/20/7/075701, pp. 1-9. |
| Pavlovic, V.I., et al., “Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: A Review,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 677-695. |
| Barat et al., “Feature Correspondences From Multiple Views of Coplanar Ellipses”, 2nd International Symposium on Visual Computing, Author Manuscript, 2006, 10 pages. |
| Bardinet, et al., “Fitting of iso-Surfaces Using Superquadrics and Free-Form Deformations” [on-line], Jun. 24-25, 1994 [retrieved Jan. 9, 2014], 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis, Retrieved from the Internet: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=315882&tag=1, pp. 184-193. |
| Butail, S., et al., “Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Fast-Start Swimming Kinematics of Densely Schooling Fish,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Jun. 3, 2011, retrieved from the Internet <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21642367>, pp. 0, 1-12. |
| Cheikh et al., “Multipeople Tracking Across Multiple Cameras”, International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications (IJNCAA), vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 23-33. |
| Chung, et al., “Recovering LSHGCs and SHGCs from Stereo,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 20, No. 1/2, 1996, pp. 43-58. |
| Cumani, A, et al., “Recovering the 3D Structure of Tubular Objects from Stereo Silhouettes,” Pattern Recognition, Elsevier, GB, vol. 30, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1997, 9 pages. |
| Davis et al., “Toward 3-D Gesture Recognition”, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, No. 03, 1999, pp. 381-393. |
| Di Zenzo, S., et al., “Advances in Image Segmentation,” Image and Vision Computing, Elsevier, Guildford, GBN, vol. 1, No. 1, Copyright Butterworth & Co Ltd., Nov. 1, 1983, pp. 196-210. |
| Forbes, K., et al., “Using Silhouette Consistency Constraints to Build 3D Models,” University of Cape Town, Copyright De Beers 2003, Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.dip.ee.uct.ac.za/˜kforbes/Publications/Forbes2003Prasa.pdf> on Jun. 17, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Heikkila, J., “Accurate Camera Calibration and Feature Based 3-D Reconstruction from Monocular Image Sequences”, Infotech Oulu and Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, 1997, 126 pages. |
| Kanhangad, V., et al., “A Unified Framework for Contactless Hand Verification,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, US., vol. 6, No. 3, Sep. 1, 2011, pp. 1014-1027. |
| Kim, et al., “Development of an Orthogonal Double-Image Processing Algorithm to Measure Bubble,” Department of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Seoul National University Korea, vol. 39 No. 4, Published Jul. 6, 2007, pp. 313-326. |
| Kulesza, et al., “Arrangement of a Multi Stereo Visual Sensor System for a Human Activities Space,” Source: Stereo Vision, Book edited by: Dr. Asim Bhatti, ISBN 978-953-7619-22-0, Copyright Nov. 2008, I-Tech, Vienna, Austria, www.intechopen.com, pp. 153-173. |
| May, S., et al., “Robust 3D-Mapping with Time-of-Flight Cameras,” 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Oct. 10, 2009, pp. 1673-1678. |
| Olsson, K., et al., “Shape from Silhouette Scanner—Creating a Digital 3D Model of a Real Object by Analyzing Photos From Multiple Views,” University of Linkoping, Sweden, Copyright VCG 2001, Retrieved from the Internet: <http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:18671/FULLTEXT01> on Jun. 17, 2013, 52 pages. |
| Pedersini, et al., Accurate Surface Reconstruction from Apparent Contours, Sep. 5-8, 2000 European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO 2000, vol. 4, Retrieved from the Internet: http://home.deib.polimi.it/sarti/CV_and_publications.html, pp. 1-4. |
| Rasmussen, Matihew K., “An Analytical Framework for the Preparation and Animation of a Virtual Mannequin forthe Purpose of Mannequin-Clothing Interaction Modeling”, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Iowa, Dec. 2008, 98 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,104—Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2017, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,730—Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2016, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Response to Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2017 filed Jul. 6, 2017, 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Advisory Action dated Jun. 22, 2017, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2017, 71 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,694—Response to Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2017, filed Nov. 10, 2017, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/155,722—Response to Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015, filed Feb. 2, 2016, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/155,722—Notice of Allowance dated May 27, 2016, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,691—Supplemental Response to Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, filed Jul. 20, 2018, 22 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190018495 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61816487 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14262691 | Apr 2014 | US |
| Child | 15917066 | US |
