NON-TRIAZOLE IMIDAZOLINE AND AMIDE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING CORROSION IN INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20250198010
  • Publication Number
    20250198010
  • Date Filed
    December 11, 2024
    11 months ago
  • Date Published
    June 19, 2025
    5 months ago
Abstract
Methods of treating aqueous systems with treatment compositions including non-triazole derivatives of imidazoline and/or amide compounds are provided that are effective to inhibit corrosion of corrodible metal surfaces in the aqueous systems. The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds show comparable or better corrosion inhibition as compared to conventional triazole corrosion inhibitors, and have low toxicity and good stability in the presence of halogens such as halogen-containing biocides or free chlorine.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This application relates generally to non-triazole imidazoline and amide compounds and their use as corrosion inhibitors to inhibit corrosion in industrial water systems including mixed metal systems.


BACKGROUND

Corrosion of metal surfaces in water systems is a serious problem. Corrosion can cause undesirable consequences, including loss of heat transfer, increased cleaning frequency, equipment repairs and replacements, shutdowns, environmental problems and the increasing resources and costs associated with each. Some causes of increased corrosion of metal surfaces include high dissolved solids, acidic environments, elevated temperatures, microbiological growth, organic and mineral deposits, and fluids that contain relatively high concentration of gases such as oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, or carbon dioxide.


Ferrous metals such as stainless steel are commonly used in industrial water systems such as for heat exchangers in cooling waters. Stainless steel has good mechanical and physical properties for long service life, as well as generally good corrosion resistance. However, even stainless steel can be subject to pitting and crevice corrosion.


Copper and its alloys (all referred to generally as “yellow metals”) are also commonly used in cooling water treatment systems for heat exchanger tubing, pump impellers, and various other applications due to the natural corrosion resistance and high thermal conductivity of these metals. However, copper and its alloys are not immune to corrosion in cooling water applications especially in the presence of halogen based oxidizing biocides such as hypochlorous acid (HOCl) or hypobromous acid (HOBr), which results in corrosion and possibly failure of heat exchangers. Current corrosion inhibitors for copper and its alloys include triazole-based compounds, i.e., a heterocyclic compound that includes a five-membered ring of two carbon atoms and three nitrogen atoms. Conventional triazole corrosion inhibitors include tolyltriazole (TT), benzotriazole (BZT), and chlorinated tolyltriazole (Cl-TT). The triazoles work as yellow metal corrosion inhibitors by forming an inhibitor film on the surface of yellow metals through bonding with copper. However, the film formed by triazoles can be disrupted by halogen-based biocides (e.g., HOCl), which can lead to corrosion and equipment failure. The film formed by triazoles on the metal surface is also affected by high free chlorine and it requires additional triazole to re-passivate the film for corrosion protection. Additionally, in the bulk water, the triazole inhibitor can react and be degraded by halogen-containing biocide and its corrosion inhibition capacity reduced. Triazole inhibitors and their halogenated derivatives also have high aquatic toxicity which can limit their application in industrial cooling water treatment, and the raw materials required to manufacture triazoles are often impacted by cost fluctuation and supply chain vulnerability.


Imidazoline compounds, such as 2-imidazolines, 3-imidazolines, and 4-imidazolines, are a known class of heterocycles formally derived from imidazoles by the reduction of one of the two double bonds. Alkylamphocarboxylates belong to this group of compounds and are known surfactants. Despite their applications as a surfactant, imidazoline compounds and amide compounds have not previously been considered for use in inhibiting corrosion in industrial water systems.


Industrial water systems, including cooling water systems, present unique challenges in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Historically, phosphate and triazole-based inhibitor compositions have been considered. But these treatments lack stability and can be toxic. These and other issues are addressed by the present disclosure.


SUMMARY

The inventors found that certain non-triazole imidazoline and amide compounds are particularly efficacious and stable in industrial water systems, including cooling water systems. In particular, they found that these compounds have surprising chelating properties dictated by specific functional groups that result in superior corrosion resistance and that will not overreact in the presence of halogens, such as halogen-containing biocides or free chlorine, in the water systems, i.e., they have low Cl2 demand (e.g., 2 mg/L or less, 1.1 mg/L or less, 0.1 mg/L to 1.1 mg/L, or 0.2 mg/L to 0.8 mg/L).


According to one aspect, this disclosure provides a method of inhibiting corrosion of a corrodible metal surface that contacts a water stream in a water system. The method includes introducing into the water stream a treatment composition including at least one of (i) at least one non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound comprising at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group, at least two nitrogen atoms, and an alkyl group, and (ii) at least one amide compound comprising at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group, at least two nitrogen atoms, and an alkyl group.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph showing the corrosion of a copper alloy surface when treated with non-triazole imidazoline corrosion inhibitors and conventional triazole corrosion inhibitors;



FIG. 2 is a graph showing the corrosion of a copper alloy surface when treated with various non-triazole imidazoline and amide corrosion inhibitors; and



FIG. 3 is a graph showing the CL2 demand of a copper alloy surface when treated with non-triazole imidazoline corrosion inhibitors and conventional triazole corrosion inhibitors.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This disclosure provides novel non-triazole imidazoline and amide chemistries that are effective to prevent corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with water. The non-triazole imidazoline and amide corrosion inhibitors overcome several of the drawbacks of known triazole-based corrosion inhibitors. In particular, disclosed non-triazole imidazoline and amide corrosion inhibitors have been shown to perform as better corrosion inhibitors for metal surfaces than conventional compounds used in cooling water corrosion inhibition applications. They have low halogen demand while exhibiting good corrosion resistance.


Disclosed non-triazole imidazoline corrosion inhibitors form films on the surface of the metal and provide a hydrophobic barrier. This barrier prevents the transmission of corroding species like oxygen from interacting with the metal surface. These inhibitors and similar derivatives show excellent performance with yellow metals like copper and brass.


Treatment Compounds

In embodiments, the non-triazole imidazoline corrosion inhibitors may include compounds that are non-triazole derivatives of imidazoline and/or amide compounds having at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group and at least two nitrogen atoms. The number of the at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group can be in a range of, for example, 1 to 6, 1 to 4, or 2 to 4. The number of the at least two nitrogen atoms can be in a range of, for example, 2 to 6, 2 to 5, or 2 to 4. These compounds may include two nitrogens and at least 1 carboxylate group in the main chain. Preferably, the compounds include 1 to 2 carboxylate groups. The non-triazole derivatives of imidazoline may be formed by reacting an imidazoline with an aminoamine and reacting the product with a haloacetic acid or salt thereof in the presence of an alkali to hydrolyze the nitrile.


Non-triazole derivative compounds particularly suitable for disclosed applications may include but are not limited to compounds of Formula (I) below:




embedded image


In Formula (I), R may be a hydrocarbon group that can include from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, from 7 to 20 carbon atoms, from 11 to 20 carbon atoms, or from 13 to 15 carbon atoms, for example. The hydrocarbon group can be linear, branched, cyclic or heterocyclic, aliphatic or aromatic, saturated or unsaturated. The hydrocarbon group can include one or more of the following atoms/moieties: halogen, heteroatom, amino, aminoalkyl, cyano, alkoxy, hydroxyl, polyhydroxyl, thiol, alkythiol, carbonyl, nitro, phosphoryl, phosphonyl, sulfonyl. If non-cyclic, the hydrocarbon can be terminated with an amine or hydroxyl group. If the hydrocarbon group includes heteroatoms, the heteroatoms can be present in the hydrocarbon backbone in numbers of, for example, 1, 2, 3, or 4 heteroatoms, including, e.g., N, O, S, and the hydrocarbon group can also be substituted with a halogen atom. If aromatic groups are present, they can include heterocyclic aromatic groups, including a pyridine group, for example.


The compound of Formula (I) may be sodium dicarboxylethyl coco phosphoethyl imidazoline.


In other embodiments, the non-triazole imidazoline corrosion inhibitors may include amide compounds and amide derivatives having at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group and at least two nitrogen atoms. The number of the at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group can be in a range of, for example, 1 to 6, 1 to 4, or 2 to 4. The number of the at least two nitrogen atoms can be in a range of, for example, 2 to 6, 2 to 5, or 2 to 4. These compounds may include two nitrogens and at least 1 carboxylate group in the main chain.


Amide or amide derivative compounds particularly suitable for disclosed applications may include but are not limited to compounds of Formula (II) below:




embedded image


In Formula (II), R may be a hydrocarbon group that can include from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, from 7 to 20 carbon atoms, from 11 to 20 carbon atoms, or from 13 to 15 carbon atoms, each R′ may be independently H or C, R″ may be N, a nitrogen-containing group, O, C, OH, or COOH, n may be 1 to 20, 1 to 10, 1 to 6, or 1 to 3, m may be 1 to 20, 1 to 10, 1 to 6, or 1 to 3, and 1 may be 1 to 20, 1 to 10, 1 to 6, or 1 to 3, for example. The hydrocarbon group can be linear, branched, cyclic or heterocyclic, aliphatic or aromatic, saturated or unsaturated. The hydrocarbon group can include one or more of the following atoms/moieties: halogen, heteroatom, amino, aminoalkyl, cyano, alkoxy, hydroxyl, polyhydroxyl, thiol, alkythiol, carbonyl, nitro, phosphoryl, phosphonyl, sulfonyl. If non-cyclic, the hydrocarbon can be terminated with an amine or hydroxyl group. If the hydrocarbon group includes heteroatoms, the heteroatoms can be present in the hydrocarbon backbone in numbers of, for example, 1, 2, 3, or 4 heteroatoms, including, e.g., N, O, S, and the hydrocarbon group can also be substituted with a halogen atom. If aromatic groups are present, they can include heterocyclic aromatic groups, including a pyridine group, for example.


Compounds of Formula (II) may include compounds of Formulas (IIA)-(IIF) below, i.e., disodium cocoamphodipropionate (Formula (IIA)), disodium cocoamphodiacetate (Formula (IIB)), disodium capryloamphodipropionate (Formula (IIC)), sodium cocoamphoacetate (Formula (IID)), disodium dapryloamphodiacetate (Formula (IIE)), and disodium lauroamphodiacetate (Formula (IIF)).




embedded image


The compounds of Formulas (I) and (II) do not include any triazole groups, and preferably do not include any tetrazole groups. Among the compounds of Formulas (I) and (II), sodium dicarboxylethyl coco phosphoethyl imidazoline, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, sodium cocoamphoacetate, and disodium lauroamphodiacetate are preferred due to their superior corrosion inhibition performance, which, without intending to be bound by theory, is believed to be due to their longer chain lengths.


Treatment Methods

The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds described above can be combined with water that is in contact with a metal surface to inhibit or prevent corrosion of the metal surface. In embodiments, the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds may be introduced into open or closed water systems. Further, the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds can be applied to the water stream while the water system is on-line. The methods of inhibiting corrosion can be used in aqueous systems including, but not limited to cooling water, cooling towers, water distribution systems, boilers, pasteurizers, water and brine carrying pipelines, storage tanks and the like. In general, water in these aqueous systems is at least 90 wt. % water, at least 95 wt. % water, or at least 99 wt. % water.


The metal surface that is in contact with the treated water can include ferrous metals such as steel (e.g., mild steel, stainless steel, galvanized steel, etc.), aluminum and its alloys, and yellow metals (e.g., copper and copper-based alloys including bronzes, brasses, etc.). In one aspect, it has been discovered that disclosed non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds are particularly useful in inhibiting corrosion of yellow metals. In this regard, the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds, and in particular compounds of Formula (I) and (II) and derivatives, can prevent corrosion on yellow metals by forming an insoluble protective film on the surface. It is believed that the film is stabilize by a molecular bond with the organic inhibitor and copper and prevents surface interaction with corrosive species.


The water systems may be mixed metal systems. In embodiments, mixed metal systems include systems that include surfaces of two or more metals such as copper or copper alloy metal surfaces and another metal. The other metals may include, but are not limited to, iron, silver, steel, zinc alloy, and aluminum. In embodiments, the other metal may be stainless steel, ferrous steel, and/or galvanized steel.


The water in the aqueous systems may contain a free halogen residual in amounts of from 0 to 20 ppm, from 0.01 to 10 ppm, from 0.1 to 5 ppm, or from 0 to 2 ppm, for example. The water temperature may be from 0 to 200° C., from 0 to 180° C., from 0 to 140° C., from 1 to 120° C., from 1 to 100° C., from 20 to 70° C., from 40 to 60° C., or about 50° C. The water in the aqueous systems may be pressurized. The pH of the water may have a value of from 2 to 12, from 4 to 10, from 6 to 9, from 7.0 to 8.5, from 7.5 to 8.5, or about 8.


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds described above can be combined with the water in the water system in amounts that are effective to form a film of the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compound(s) on the metal surface and reduce corrosion of the metal surface to a desired degree. The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds can be added so that the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds is present in the water in amounts of from 0.01 ppm to 500 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm, from 0.01 ppm to 50 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 10 ppm, or from 1 ppm to 3 ppm, for example. The non-triazole imidazoline and/or compounds can be added to the water continuously, periodically, or intermittently.


In embodiments, the treatment composition may be used in conjunction with other corrosion inhibitors. With mild steel, for example, the other corrosion inhibitors may include, but are not limited to, Sn, Al, PO4, and Zn. In other embodiments, the treatment composition may exclude cathodic corrosion inhibitors including, but not limited, to rare earth metals.


The compounds can be added in response to a measured parameter of the water or of the metal surface, including when a measured amount of corrosion inhibitor drops below a predetermined threshold. The compounds can be added in response to a system demand of the system or surface demand of the metal surface.


System demand may be attributed to the presence of oxygen, halogens, other oxidizing species and other components in the aqueous system that can react with or remove, and thereby deactivate or consume, the inhibitor. System demand also includes inhibitor losses associated with bulk water loss through, for example, blowdown and/or other discharges from the treated system. System demand does not, however, include inhibitor that binds to or otherwise reacts with the wetted metal surfaces.


Surface demand is the consumption of the inhibitor attributed to the interaction between the inhibitor and a reactive metal surface. Surface demand will decline as the inhibitor forms a protective film or layer on those metal surfaces that were vulnerable to corrosion. Once all of the wetted surfaces have been adequately protected, the surface demand will be nothing or almost nothing. Because the intermittent feed methods according to embodiments focus on treating the metal rather than treating the water, once the surface demand is reduced to values close to zero, the inhibitor feed amount can be substantially reduced or even terminated for some period of time without compromising the effectiveness of the corrosion inhibition program.


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds can be added to the water in sufficient amounts and over a sufficient duration so that a protective film is formed on the corrodible metal surface, and in particular so that the protective film has a thickness that is in a range of from 1 to 150 nm, from 5 nm to 50 nm, or from 10 nm to 20 nm. The thickness of the protective film can be measured by applying a platinum coating to the corrodible metal surface (to enhance visibility of the protective film), imaging a cross-section of the corrodible metal surface with a Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM), and then measuring the average protective film thickness from the STEM image as is known in the art. Forming a protective film of this thickness is evidence that inhibitor treatment has formed a uniform robust film that is effective to inhibit corrosion of the metal surface. In some embodiments, the film may take from 5 days to 120 days or from 15 days to 90 days with regular dosing of the inhibitor to achieve a suitable film thickness.


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds can also increase the hydrophobicity of the corrodible metal surface, which reduces the wettability of the surface and thereby also reduces the corrosion potential. The increased hydrophobicity of the surface is also an indication that the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds have formed a protective film on the surface. The hydrophobicity of the corrodible metal surface can be quantified by placing a drop of water on the surface and measuring the contact angle of the droplet in accordance with ASTM D594. The treatment composition can be added in a sufficient amount and for a sufficient duration so that the treated metal surface exhibits a contact angle in a range of from 65 to 85 degrees, from 70 to 80 degrees, or from 72 to 78 degrees, for example. Similarly, the contact angle of the treated metal surface can increase by up to 40%, from 5% to 30%, or from 15% to 25%, for example, as compared to a like metal surface that is not treated with the treatment composition (i.e., having no protective film).


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide compounds can be added to the water in the form of a powder or an aqueous solution. If added as an aqueous solution, the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide can be present in amounts of from 1 to 60 wt. % or from 5 to 40 wt. %, for example.


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide inhibitors have improved aquatic toxicity, as compared to conventional azole inhibitors. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the treated water that is in contact with the metal surface is free of or substantially free of triazole compounds, e.g., less than 5 ppm triazole compounds, less than 1 ppm triazole compounds, or less than 0.1 ppm triazole compounds. In particular, the treated water can be free of or substantially free of tolyltriazole, benzotriazole, and chlorinated tolyltriazole.


In some embodiments, the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide inhibitors can be added to the water in combination with other inhibitor treatment agents including triazoles, polymers, phosphonates, and/or phosphates.


The non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide inhibitors also have improved halogen stability, and remain effective to inhibit corrosion even in the water that contains halogen-containing biocides or free chlorine. In this regard, it is believed that these halogens do not substantially disrupt the film formed by the above-referenced non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide corrosion inhibitors and do not degrade those compounds in the bulk water. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the treated water that is in contact with the metal surface includes at least 0.1 ppm of a halogen-containing biocide and/or free chlorine, at least 0.5 ppm, at least 1 ppm, or from 1 ppm to 10 ppm. Halogen-containing biocides may include, for example, hypochlorous acid or hypobromous acid. Likewise, in some embodiments, methods include combining a halogen-containing biocide with the treated water in addition to the non-triazole imidazoline or amide compound.


In addition to the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide corrosion inhibitor, other components can be added to the water as part of the treatment, including chelating agents, scale inhibitors, dispersants, biocides (such as the halogen-containing biocide noted above), and combinations thereof. These components can be included as part of a treatment composition with the non-triazole and/or amide corrosion inhibitor or can be added to the water separately. Suitable chelating agents include, for example, citric acid, 2-butenedioic acid (Z), and their derivatives. Other chelating agents may include, but are not limited to, glutamic acid, N,N-diacetic acid, tetrasodium salt (GLDA), methylglycine N,N-Diacetic Trisodium Salt (MGDA), and ethanoldiglycinic disodium salt (EDG). GLDA, MGDA, and EDG have been found to be particularly suitable with amide corrosion inhibitors.


Suitable scale inhibitors and dispersants can include one or more of unsaturated carboxylic acid polymers such as polyacrylic acid, homo or co-polymaleic acid (synthesized from solvent and aqueous routes); acrylate/2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid (APMS) copolymers, copolymer of maleic and acrylic acid (MA/AA), acrylate/acrylamide copolymers, acrylate homopolymers, terpolymers of carboxylate/sulfonate/maleate, terpolymers of acrylic acid/AMPS; phosphonates and phosphinates including 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC), 1-hydroxy ethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP), amino tris methylene phosphonic acid (ATMP), 2-hydroxyphosphonocarboxylic acid (HPA), diethylenetriamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DETPMP), bis(hexamethylene triamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid) (BHMTPMP), phosphinosuccinic oligomer (PSO), tetrapotassium pyrophosphate (TKPP), phosphoric acid; salts of molybdenum and tungsten including nitrates and nitrites; amines such as N,N-diethylhydroxylamine (DEHA), diethyl amino ethanol (DEAE), dimethylethanolamine (DMAE), cyclohexylamine, morpholine, and monoethanolamine (MEA). The other components can be added so that the components are present in the water in amounts of from 0.01 ppm to 500 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm, from 0.01 to 50 ppm, for example.


In some embodiments, at least one triazole compound such as tolyltriazole (TTA), benzotriazole (BZT), methylbenzotriazole (MBT), butylbenzotriazole (BuBZT), halogen-stable azole (HST), halogenated azoles, and their salts, may be added. The at least one triazole compound can be added so that the triazole compound is present in the water in amounts of from 0.01 ppm to 5 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 1 ppm, from 0.01 to 0.50 ppm, for example. The non-triazole and/or amide compound is dosed in greater amounts than the triazole. In embodiments, the at least one non-triazole and/or amide compound and the at least one triazole compound may be present in the water in a mass ratio of from 1,000:1 to 50:1, from 500:1 to 100:1, from 300:1 to 100:1, from 250:1 to 150:1, or about 200:1, for example. The inventors found that non-triazole and/or amide corrosion inhibitors in combination with low active triazole compounds result in particularly synergistic corrosion inhibition. The inventors found that the triazole may be added in small amounts and result in synergy while still obtaining the benefit of less toxicity. This combination is synergistic and can be done with substantially reduced aquatic toxicity as compared to using triazoles alone to achieve the same level of corrosion inhibition.


In some embodiments, a sugar acid may be added. The sugar acids may include, but are not limited to, glucaric acid, gluconic acid, glucoheptonate, citric/poly citric acid, ascorbic acid, erythorbic acid, glycolic acid, adipic acid, aqueous and a solvent based polymaleic acid. These acids may be added so that amounts of these acids in the water stream are from 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 50 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 10 ppm, from 1 to 10 ppm, or from 1 to 5 ppm, for example. In embodiments, the sugar acid may be a polyol such as, for example, a carbohydrate-derived polyol. In preferred embodiments, the carbohydrate-derived polyol is glucoheptonate.


In some embodiments, a Sn, Al, PO4, Zn, polymaleic acid (PMA), nitrite, molybdate, silicate, or borate compound may be added. These compounds may be added so that amounts of these compounds in the water stream are from 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm, 0.01 ppm to 50 ppm, from 1 to 10 ppm, or from 1 to 5 ppm, for example. The inventors found that the combination of the non-triazole and/or amide corrosion inhibitor and nitrite, molybdate, silicate, or borate compound is particularly beneficial in closed loop systems.


In some embodiments, one or more fluorescent agents can be combined with the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide inhibitor or added to the water together with the non-triazole imidazoline and/or amide inhibitor to detect and quantify the amount of inhibitor in the water. In embodiments, the fluorescent agents can include a reactive chemical tracer (e.g., PTSA) that interacts with the non-triazole group in a way that affects the fluorescence intensity and a non-reactive chemical tracer such as a tagged polymer. Suitable fluorescent agents that can be used are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,024,751, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

Several classes of compounds at various concentrations were tested to determine their potential to inhibit corrosion of copper alloy in aqueous systems to determine their potential to inhibit corrosion of copper alloy in aqueous systems as shown in Table 1 below.










TABLE 1







Control
water


Halogen stable triazole (HST)
1 ppm


Glucoheptonate
5 ppm


Imidazoline Derivative
1 ppm


Imidazoline Derivative
3 ppm


HST/Imidazoline Derivative
0.5 ppm/1 ppm


Glucoheptonate/Imidazoline Derivative
  5 ppm/1 ppm


HST/Glucoheptonate/Imidazoline Derivative
0.1 ppm/5 ppm/1 ppm










In this example, the imidazoline derivative was sodium dicarboxylethyl coco phosphoethyl imidazoline (SDCPI).


One liter samples of synthetic water were each dosed with the compositions in Table 1. The composition of the synthetic water is shown in Table 2 below.












TABLE 2









pH
7.5











Ca as CaCO3
600
ppm



Mg as CaCO3
300
ppm



Sulfate
600
ppm



Malk as CaCO3
75
ppm



Silica as SiO2
10
ppm



Chloride
430
ppm










The apparatus used for the corrosion testing was a Gamry Multiport Corrosion Cell and Gamry Reference 600+ potentiostat with multiplexor. Copper coupons (CDA110) were added to the sample cells containing neutral water (pH 7.5), and the cells were dosed with 50 ppm of scale inhibitor (co-polymer and 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-yricarboxylic acid) and heated to 50° C. and maintained at this temperature throughout the testing. The cells were continuously stirred at a speed of 350 rpm. A cylindrical working electrode was submerged into the test solutions, and an LPR sweep (linear polarization resistance) was performed every hour for 18 hours. After the 0.5 hrs mark, 1 ppm of free chlorine was dosed into the corrosion cell. The testing parameters are summarized in Table 3 below.













TABLE 3









Temperature
50°
C.










Free Chlorine Residual
1 ppm after 0.5 hrs



Metallurgy
CDA110











Product Dosage (unless otherwise notes)
5
ppm



Duration
18
hrs



Stirring Speed
350
rpm










The corrosion rates (in mpy) over the 18 hour period are shown in Table 4 below and in FIG. 1. As can be seen, the imidazoline derivative compounds exhibit superior corrosion inhibition properties over the entire 18 hour period as compared to sugar acid, e.g., glucoheptonate, inhibitors alone. And, unlike the sugar acid inhibitor, the imidazoline derivative compounds corrosion inhibitors did not exhibit substantial deterioration in corrosion resistance when free chlorine was added. Moreover, the imidazoline derivative compounds+glucoheptonate and/or HST compounds exhibit superior corrosion inhibition properties over the entire 18 hour period as compared to the imidazoline derivative compounds alone.














TABLE 4












3 ppm





5 ppm
1 ppm Imidazoline
Imidazoline


Time (hrs)
Control
1 ppm HST
Glucoheptonate
Derivative
Derivative





0
0.116
0.012
0.074
0.025
0.013


1
2.975
0.147
2.670
0.279
0.053


2
2.581
0.269
2.004
0.252
0.039


3
2.156
0.286
1.238
0.257
0.043


4
1.609
0.234
0.784
0.245
0.042


5
1.412
0.163
0.536
0.214
0.042


6
1.078
0.131
0.504
0.200
0.044


7
0.936
0.111
0.449
0.184
0.044


8
0.616
0.100
0.357
0.175
0.044


9
0.519
0.090
0.331
0.174
0.046


10
0.503
0.084
0.311
0.182
0.046


11
0.434
0.078
0.297
0.197
0.046


12
0.447
0.071
0.288
0.213
0.044


13
0.396
0.065
0.280
0.226
0.043


14
0.405
0.059
0.274
0.240
0.042


15
0.394
0.051
0.269
0.247
0.041


16
0.365
0.047
0.267
0.249
0.040


17
0.358
0.042
0.260
0.241
0.039


18
0.340
0.039
0.257
0.226
0.038


CR Average (10-
0.405
0.060
0.278
0.224
0.042


18 hrs)


CR Peak
2.975
0.286
2.670
0.279
0.053


Cl2 Demand (mg/L)
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.8

















5 ppm
0.1 ppm HST-5 ppm




0.5 ppm HST-1 ppm
Glucoheptonate-
Glucoheptonate-




Imidazoline
1 ppm Imidazoline
1 ppm Imidazoline



Time (hrs)
Derivative
Derivative
Derivative







0
0.004
0.008
0.006



1
0.027
0.106
0.036



2
0.018
0.086
0.025



3
0.041
0.082
0.022



4
0.013
0.071
0.017



5
0.012
0.077
0.014



6
0.010
0.072
0.046



7
0.009
0.071
0.013



8
0.009
0.069
0.012



9
0.008
0.068
0.012



10
0.008
0.065
0.011



11
0.008
0.061
0.011



12
0.007
0.057
0.010



13
0.007
0.054
0.010



14
0.007
0.052
0.009



15
0.006
0.050
0.009



16
0.006
0.048
0.008



17
0.006
0.045
0.008



18
0.006
0.044
0.008



CR Average (10-
0.007
0.053
0.009



18 hrs)



CR Peak
0.041
0.106
0.046



Cl2 Demand (mg/L)
0.4
0.7
0.7










Example 2

Several classes of compounds at various concentrations were tested to determine their potential to inhibit corrosion of copper alloy in aqueous systems to determine their potential to inhibit corrosion of copper alloy in aqueous systems as shown in Table 5 below.












TABLE 5









Control
water











HST
1.5
ppm



SDCPI
2
ppm



Disodium Coco Imidazoline Dicarboxylate
2
ppm



(DCIMDCC)



Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate (DCADAA)
2
ppm



Disodium Capryloamphodipropionate
2
ppm



(DCADPP)



Sodium Cocoamphoacetate (SCAA)
2
ppm



Disodium Capryloamphodiacetate
2
ppm



(DCyADAA)



Disodium Lauroamphodiacetate (DLADAA)
2
ppm



NaGlucoheptonate
5
ppm



Tetrasodium Dicarboxyethyl Stearyl
7
ppm



Sulfosuccinamate (TDSS)



Oleyl Sarcosine (OS)
2
ppm



Sodium Lauriminodipropionate (SL)
2
ppm



15% HST
10
ppm



Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
10
ppm



(37.5%)/NaGlucoheptonate blend (B1)



Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
10
ppm



(25%)/NaGlucoheptonate blend (B2)



Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
10
ppm










(20%)/NaGlucoheptonate blend (B3)










One liter samples of the synthetic water described above with respect to Example 1 were each dosed with the compositions in Table 5 and processed under conditions similar to Example 1.


The corrosion rates (in mpy) over the 18 hour period are shown in Tables 6A and 6B below and in FIG. 2. As can be seen, sodium dicarboxyethyl coco phosphoethyl imidazoline (SDCPI), disodium cocoamphodiacetate (DCADAA), sodium cocoamphoacetate (SCAA), and disodium lauroamphodiacetate (DLADAA), examples according to disclosed embodiments, exhibited good corrosion inhibition properties over the entire 18 hour period. Disodium capryloamphodipropionate (DCADPP) and disodium capryloamphodiacetate (DCyADAA) exhibited inferior corrosion inhibition properties and, in particular, substantial deterioration in corrosion resistance when free chlorine was added. It is believed, without intending to be bound by theory, that DCADPP and DCyADAA exhibited inferior properties due to their shorter chain lengths. Oleyl sarcosine (OS) and sodium lauriminodipropionate (SL) also did not perform well. In this regard, SL only has 1 nitrogen.


















TABLE 6A







1.5 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm
2 ppm


Time (hrs)
Control
HST
SDCPI
DCIMDCC
DCADAA
DCADPP
SCAA
DCyADAA
DLADAA
























0
0.109
0.0118
0.0168
0.0395
0.0198
0.0293
0.0217
0.0230
0.0175


1
2.646
0.0496
0.0923
0.2665
0.1804
2.1690
0.1969
2.8540
0.3923


2
2.035
0.0404
0.0637
0.1537
0.1576
1.4770
0.0988
1.5850
0.3065


3
1.663
0.0373
0.0529
0.0908
0.1608
1.3090
0.0761
1.3860
0.2159


4
1.271
0.0329
0.0240
0.0856
0.1140
0.6705
0.0602
0.5261
0.1420


5
0.940
0.0303
0.0173
0.0744
0.1360
0.6007
0.0506
0.6207
0.1385


6
0.625
0.0262
0.0164
0.0600
0.0910
0.6353
0.0473
0.5852
0.1059


7
0.539
0.0229
0.0167
0.0499
0.0780
0.5403
0.0347
0.4766
0.0894


8
0.472
0.0201
0.0171
0.0409
0.0629
0.4352
0.0293
0.4185
0.0705


9
0.399
0.0182
0.0179
0.0375
0.0545
0.3962
0.0257
0.3747
0.0631


10
0.393
0.0162
0.0165
0.0339
0.0516
0.3671
0.0231
0.3416
0.0512


11
0.382
0.0148
0.0151
0.0313
0.0459
0.3426
0.0212
0.3181
0.0461


12
0.399
0.0132
0.0139
0.0283
0.0419
0.3293
0.0191
0.2953
0.0419


13
0.394
0.0121
0.0133
0.0266
0.0375
0.3130
0.0177
0.2800
0.0378


14
0.371
0.0110
0.0127
0.0243
0.0349
0.2994
0.0166
0.2681
0.0347


15
0.352
0.0104
0.0117
0.0224
0.0316
0.2826
0.0156
0.2352
0.0304


16
0.350
0.0099
0.0116
0.0209
0.0290
0.2749
0.0142
0.2411
0.0282


17
0.332
0.0092
0.0113
0.0196
0.0246
0.2691
0.0139
0.2394
0.0262


18
0.323
0.0087
0.0103
0.0188
0.0252
0.2604
0.0128
0.2217
0.0242


CR Average (10-18 hrs)
0.366
0.012
0.013
0.025
0.036
0.304
0.017
0.271
0.036


CR Peak
2.646
0.050
0.092
0.267
0.180
2.169
0.197
2.854
0.392


Cl2 Demand (mg/L)
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.9
0.6
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.7
























TABLE 6B






5 ppm



10 ppm





Time (hrs)
NaGlucoheptonate
7 ppm TDSS
2 ppm OS
2 ppm SL
15% HST
10 ppm B1
10 ppm B2
10 ppm B3























0
0.074
0.0149
0.0077
0.0368
0.013
0.0345
0.0074
0.0069


1
2.670
0.1875
0.1746
0.9317
0.038
0.0796
0.0297
0.0232


2
2.004
0.2432
0.2632
0.4889
0.061
0.1194
0.0277
0.0229


3
1.238
0.2313
0.2927
0.3498
0.099
0.0994
0.0320
0.0229


4
0.784
0.1839
0.3262
0.2185
0.128
0.1031
0.0341
0.0231


5
0.536
0.1611
0.3585
0.1644
0.087
0.1009
0.0345
0.0230


6
0.504
0.1349
0.3857
0.1286
0.078
0.0932
0.0347
0.0220


7
0.449
0.1387
0.3995
0.1128
0.072
0.0839
0.0332
0.0207


8
0.357
0.1304
0.4023
0.0992
0.072
0.0744
0.0317
0.0190


9
0.331
0.1291
0.3769
0.0910
0.070
0.0657
0.0298
0.0177


10
0.311
0.1381
0.3773
0.0854
0.066
0.0556
0.0278
0.0160


11
0.297
0.1431
0.3415
0.0779
0.061
0.0471
0.0262
0.0148


12
0.288
0.1363
0.3393
0.0757
0.056
0.0410
0.0240
0.0135


13
0.280
0.1485
0.3186
0.0685
0.054
0.0354
0.0223
0.0125


14
0.274
0.1371
0.3085
0.0643
0.049
0.0326
0.0203
0.0117


15
0.269
0.1428
0.2971
0.0613
0.048
0.0281
0.0189
0.0109


16
0.267
0.1422
0.2773
0.0580
0.044
0.0259
0.0172
0.0102


17
0.260
0.1375
0.3049
0.0543
0.041
0.0236
0.0157
0.0095


18
0.257
0.1422
0.3116
0.0536
0.040
0.0222
0.0146
0.0087


CR Average (10-18 hrs)
0.278
0.141
0.320
0.067
0.051
0.035
0.021
0.012


CR Peak
2.670
0.243
0.402
0.932
0.128
0.119
0.035
0.023


Cl2 Demand (mg/L)
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.4









Example 3

The classes of compounds and concentrations tested in this example are as shown in Table 7 below.












TABLE 7









Halogen-stable azole (HST)
1 ppm



50% sodium glucoheptonate
10 ppm 



SDCPI
1 ppm



Imidazole dicarboxylate (IMDCC)
1 ppm










One liter samples of the synthetic water described above with respect to Example 1 were each dosed with the compositions in Table 7 and processed under conditions similar to Example 1.


The control normalized Cl2 demand over time is shown in FIG. 3. As can be seen, SDCPI, an example according to disclosed embodiments, did not result in significant loss of Cl2 demand compared to 50% sodium glucoheptonate. This data shows the effectiveness of disclosed corrosion inhibitors without sacrificing Cl2 demand.


Example 4

An admiralty brass coupon was immersed in water and a treatment composition of the invention was dosed continuously for one month to maintain a constant concentration of the treatment composition of 20 ppm. The treatment composition includes approximately 3 wt. % of a halogen stable azole (i.e., dosed at 0.6 ppm), 20 wt. % of sodium glucoheptonate (i.e., dosed at 4 ppm), and 7.6 wt. % of sodium cocoamphoacetate (i.e., dosed at 1.52 ppm). The formation of a protective film having a thickness in a range of 10 nm-15 nm was observed with a STEM image. Before the treatment, the coupon was determined to have a contact angle of 62.1 degrees, and after one month of treatment, the treated surface of the coupon was determined to have a contact angle of 74.8 degrees (i.e., the contact angle increased by 20.5%).


It will be appreciated that the above-disclosed features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into different systems or methods. Also, various alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art. As such, various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method of inhibiting corrosion of a corrodible metal surface that contacts a water stream in a water system, the method comprising: introducing into the water stream a treatment composition including at least one of (i) at least one non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound comprising at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group, at least two nitrogen atoms, and an alkyl group, and (ii) at least one amide compound comprising at least one carboxylic or carboxylate group, at least two nitrogen atoms, and an alkyl group.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition includes the non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound, and the non-triazole derivative has a structure corresponding to Formula (I):
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hydrocarbon group has in a range of 11 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition includes the amide compound, and the amide compound has a structure corresponding to Formula (II):
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein R has 11 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein a number of the at least two nitrogen atoms is in a range of 2 to 4.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one carboxylate group of the non-triazole derivative is a carboxylate ether, and wherein the at least one carboxylate group of the amide compound is a carboxylate ether.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition includes the non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound, and the non-triazole derivative is sodium dicarboxylethyl coco phosphoethyl imidazoline.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition includes the amide compound, and the amide compound is selected from the group consisting of disodium cocoamphodiacetate, sodium cocoamphoacetate, and disodium lauroamphodiacetate.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound or the at least one amide compound is introduced into the water stream in an amount of from 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one non-triazole derivative of imidazoline compound or the at least one amide compound is introduced into the water stream in an amount of from 1 ppm to 3 ppm.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the corrodible metal surface is a yellow metal surface.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the water system is a mixed metal system including a yellow metal surface and at least one of a stainless steel surface, mild steel surface, galvanized steel surface, a ferrous steel surface, and an aluminum surface.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing into the water stream at least one polyol in an amount of from 0.01 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the polyol is a carbohydrate derived polyol.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing into the water stream at least one compound selected from the group consisting of glucaric acid, gluconic acid, glucoheptonate, citric/poly citric acid, ascorbic acid, erythorbic acid, glycolic acid, adipic acid, and polymaleic acid in a total amount of from 0.01 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, further comprising introducing into the water stream at least one of a nitrite, molybdate, silicate, borate, Sn, Al, Zn, PO4, polymaleic acid, and organic phosphonate compound in an amount of from 0.01 ppm to 100 ppm.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition includes the at least one amide compound, and the method further comprises introducing into the water stream at least one chelant selected from the group consisting of glutamic acid, N,N-diacetic acid, tetrasodium salt (GLDA), methylglycine N,N-Diacetic Trisodium Salt (MGDA), and ethanoldiglycinic disodium salt (EDG).
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the water stream includes less than 5 ppm triazole compounds.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment composition exhibits a chlorine demand in the water stream of 1.1 mg/L or less.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein a sufficient amount of the treatment composition is introduced into the water stream for a sufficient duration to form a protective film on the corrodible metal surface that has a thickness in a range of 1 nm to 150 nm.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein a sufficient amount of the treatment composition is introduced into the water stream for a sufficient duration so that the corrodible metal surface has a protective film and exhibits a contact angle that is in a range of from 65 to 85 degrees.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the earlier filing date benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/612,127, which was filed on Dec. 19, 2023, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63612127 Dec 2023 US