The inventions described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the U.S. Government for U.S. Government purposes.
The invention relates in general to ammunition for tanks and, in particular, to a nonlethal tank round.
Tanks are lethal weapons, one of the most lethal. In the current Iraq peacekeeping action in a MOUT (Military Operations in Urbanized Terrain) environment, the tank is sometimes not useful because of its overwhelming lethality. A tank round is needed that can be used for riot control, crowd dispersal and as an opposition force deterrent, without inflicting lethality or high collateral damage. With a nonlethal round, tanks can enter conflicts to control and disperse crowds and insurgents while minimizing the risks to U.S. soldiers. A nonlethal round allows the tank to provide a peacekeeping role. It can also be used as a low collateral damage alternative when engaging crowds/enemies adjacent to restricted structures in MOUT (schools, hospitals, religious buildings, etc.).
It is an object of the invention to provide a large caliber nonlethal round for a tank.
It is another object of the invention to provide a tank round that produces nonlethal effects from both its payload and its blast pressure.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a nonlethal round wherein the payload disperses quickly after exiting the gun muzzle.
One aspect of the invention is a nonlethal canister projectile for attachment to a tank round, comprising a generally cylindrical body having an open end; a cap for closing the open end of the body; the body and cap comprising high density polyurethane foam and defining a payload space therein; and a payload disposed in the payload space. The payload may comprise, for example, a plurality of balls, a plurality of fin stabilized projectiles, a plurality of fillable fin stabilized projectiles or inert material.
Another aspect of the invention is a nonlethal canister tank round, comprising a cartridge having a combustible case and containing propellant; a canister projectile attached to the cartridge, the canister projectile being generally cylindrical, comprising high density polyurethane foam and including a body and a cap for closing an open end of the body, the body defining a payload space therein; and a payload disposed in the payload space.
The invention will be better understood, and further objects, features, and advantages thereof will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.
The present invention is capable of controlling crowds and engaging enemy Infantry in urban terrain. The various embodiments of the tank round of the invention use a defeat mechanism comprising widely dispersed nonlethal payloads and/or blast overpressure effects capable of obtaining nonlethal ranges from 50 to 600 meters.
The payload is disposed in payload space 26. The projectile payload may comprise a variety of different objects, for example, rubber balls, rubber rockets and fillable rockets capable of carrying irritants, malodorants, marking substances, etc.
In a third embodiment of the invention, the payload space 26 of the canister projectile 14 is weighted with an inert material, such as sand or small pellets made of a rubber-like substance. In this embodiment, the projectile 14 functions much like a “blank” wherein the inert material falls to the ground shortly after muzzle exit and the nonlethal downrange effects are supplied by the blast overpressure.
In each of the described embodiments, the foam projectile disintegrates when it exits the muzzle of the gun. In the case of the first, second and fourth embodiments, this disintegration allows the nonlethal payload to spread out in a circular pattern as it moves downrange. In the third embodiment where the projectile is essentially a blank round, the projectile disintegrates and the inert payload falls to the ground, but the nonlethal blast overpressure moves downrange. It should be noted that the first, second and fourth embodiments also have a blast overpressure that provides nonlethal effectiveness.
The four embodiments (rubber balls 32, rubber fin stabilized projectiles 34, fillable rubber fin stabilized projectiles 52, and inert or blank payload) were tested at Aberdeen Proving Ground in December of 2004. The first part of the tests obtained velocity data to develop drag curves for the various payloads and, in addition, determined the blast overpressure effects, flight follower data and cannon pressures for each embodiment. The second part of the tests obtained target data. The tests of the first, second and third embodiments (balls 32, projectiles 34 and inert payload) were successful. The test of the fourth embodiment was inconclusive.
The target, velocity and pressure data were processed to determine the spread of the payload vs. range and the lethal and nonlethal effective ranges of the payloads and blast overpressure.
Tank 56 is shown in the lower right corner of each figure. The lethal zone for blast overpressure extends from the tank 56 to the Z-curve. In the lethal zone of blast overpressure, injuries more severe than hearing loss can occur. Between the Z-curve and the W-curve is the effective nonlethal area of the blast overpressure. In the effective nonlethal area, the blast overpressure may cause temporary hearing loss and psychological effects. Beyond the W-curve, no hearing protection is required. Range distances are shown in meters. In
Individuals experience a stinging sensation when hit with a payload. The nonlethal range of payloads is defined by the velocity of the payload. The nonlethal velocity range is from a velocity just slow enough to not pierce human skin to a velocity that is fifty percent of the velocity just slow enough to not pierce human skin. In
By changing charge weights and projectile weights, the designs can be modified to tailor the performance for specified requirements. By changing subprojectile densities and size, the nonlethal effective area can be expanded.
While the invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional patent application 60/522,431 filed on Sep. 30, 2004, which application is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2457817 | Harrell | Jan 1949 | A |
2983224 | Prosen et al. | May 1961 | A |
3262390 | Cowles et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3446147 | Burri et al. | May 1969 | A |
3802345 | La Costa | Apr 1974 | A |
3935816 | Boquette, Jr. | Feb 1976 | A |
3951068 | Schroeder | Apr 1976 | A |
3991682 | Peak | Nov 1976 | A |
4063508 | Whiting | Dec 1977 | A |
4089267 | Mescall et al. | May 1978 | A |
4365558 | Lippler et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4455942 | Murray et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4589342 | Rousseau | May 1986 | A |
4664034 | Christian | May 1987 | A |
4716835 | Leemans | Jan 1988 | A |
4882996 | Bock et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4922826 | Busch et al. | May 1990 | A |
4973965 | Ridge et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5014624 | Baxter et al. | May 1991 | A |
5038684 | Petrovich | Aug 1991 | A |
5105744 | Petrovich | Apr 1992 | A |
5796031 | Sigler | Aug 1998 | A |
6546874 | Vasel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6990905 | Manole et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
20050066849 | Kapeles et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60522431 | Sep 2004 | US |