Nonmodular joint prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular prosthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6500208
  • Patent Number
    6,500,208
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 3, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A nonmodular tibial prosthesis having a retainer for a modular bearing on the superior surface of a tibial base, a nonmodular primary bearing directly molded to the base, and a mechanical release member mounted on the tibial base in contact with the nonmodular primary bearing. The release member includes a wedge portion with a superiorly posteriorly inclined face, and is designed to be driven anteriorly upon actuation so as to force the primary bearing off of the tibial base, after which the primary bearing and release member are removed and replaced with a modular bearing.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to surgically implantable joint prostheses and, more particularly, to a joint prosthesis that combines advantages of modular and nonmodular prostheses.




Artificial joints of the human body, including in particular knee and hip joints, have been available for 50 years or more and have been the subject of intense development for at least the last 20 years. The earliest designs provided metal-to-bone or metal-to-metal contact between the articulating surfaces of a joint. Friction and wear were significantly reduced in subsequent designs by the introduction of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) as a load-bearing surface. For example, a typical knee joint prosthesis has a tibial component with a polyethylene load-bearing surface in contact with a metal femoral component. Early designs of this type had polyethylene cemented to the tibia, but it is conventional today to secure a polyethylene bearing to a metal base or tray which is anchored in the tibia, typically with the aid of a stem or peg extending into the medullary canal of the tibia.




Numerous methods of securing a polyethylene bearing to a metal base have been developed over the years, as exemplified by the following patents:

















U.S. Pat. No.




Inventor




Issue Date











4,205,400




Shen et al.




June 3, 1980






4,217,666




Averill




Aug. 19, 1980






4,501,031




McDaniel et al.




Feb. 26, 1985






4,714,474




Brooks et al.




Dec. 99, 1987






4,795,468




Hodorek et al.




Jan. 3, 1989






4,822,362




Walker et al.




Apr. 18, 1989






4,938,769




Shaw




Jul. 3, 1990






4,959,071




Brown et al.




Sep. 25, 1990






4,963,152




Hofmann et al.




Oct. 16, 1990






4,997,445




Hodorek




Mar. 5, 1991






5,061,271




Van Zile




Oct. 29, 1991






5,080,675




Lawes et al.




Jan. 14, 1992






5,108,442




Smith




Apr. 28, 1992






5,330,534




Herrington et al.




Jul. 19, 1994














There are two general types of tibial components: modular and nonmodular. A nonmodular prosthesis has a bearing secured to the base during fabrication in the factory, typically by direct compression molding. A modular prosthesis has a prefabricated bearing designed to be attached to the base during surgery.




A modular prosthesis has several advantages over nonmodular prostheses, one of which is that an assortment of different prostheses, i.e., different base/bearing combinations, can be created in the operating room from a small inventory of separate bases and bearings of various sizes, shapes and other characteristics. With a modular prosthesis, an orthopedic surgeon can implant an appropriate base for the patient and then fit the patient with several trial bearings in the process of selecting an appropriate primary bearing to attach to the implanted base. Modular bearings are often readily removable, and in such cases they have the further advantage of facilitating revision surgery, which may become necessary in cases of traumatic injury or bearing surface wear, by enabling replacement of the bearing without removing the base.




There are also advantages to a nonmodular prosthesis construction, such as design simplicity due to the absence of a need for a retaining mechanism for a removable bearing, and relatively low cost. An even more significant advantage is that a nonmodular tibial component is virtually immune to micromotion at the interface between the bearing and the base.




Micromotion is very difficult to avoid with modular components due to the need for clearances between bearing and base to ensure that they fit together during assembly in the operating room. A very secure locking method may avoid the problem, but nonmodular fabrication of the prosthesis, e.g., direct compression molding of a bearing onto a base, avoids the issue. Unfortunately, a nonmodular prosthesis has heretofore made revision surgery more difficult in that the entire prosthetic component must be removed and replaced. In addition to the extra operating time involved and extraction tools required, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,985 to McKay, removal and replacement of the base requires sacrificing the existing fixation to the bone and has associated complications, including possible bone loss or fracture and the difficulty of reestablishing solid fixation. Nevertheless, it is conventional wisdom regarding a nonmodular prosthesis, as stated in the above-referenced Smith patent, that “the bearing component cannot be changed without changing the base component.”




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention combines advantages of modular and nonmodular designs with a nonmodular tibial prosthesis that is convertible in vivo to a modular device. The prosthesis includes a tibial base having a retainer for a modular tibial bearing, and has a nonmodular primary bearing secured to the tibial base. According to one aspect of the invention the retainer includes a raised portion with a cavity in an inwardly facing surface thereof, and according to another aspect of the invention the retainer is adapted to cooperate with an auxiliary mechanical locking element to securely retain a modular bearing on the base.




A retainer as that term is used herein is a part of the tibial base that is capable, alone or in conjunction with an auxiliary element or elements, of retaining a modular bearing in place on the base. It may be formed on the base as a one-piece or multi-piece retainer.




According to a further aspect of the invention, a mechanical release member is mounted on the tibial base in contact with the primary bearing as a part of the nonmodular tibial prosthesis designed to be actuated during revision surgery. Upon actuation, the release member forces the primary bearing off of the tibial base, after which the primary bearing and release member are removed and replaced by a modular bearing. In some cases, conversion to a modular device would be a desirable option even during the primary surgery. It is routine for surgeons to check the patent's range of motion before and after selecting the appropriate size of tibial component and cementing the base to the tibial plateau. With a nonmodular prosthesis the surgeon has little recourse but to dislodge the cemented base and remove it and all the cement from the tibia if the final range-of-motion check is unsatisfactory. The present invention provides a desirable alternative.




A general object of the present invention is to provide an improved surgically implantable joint prosthesis.




Another object of the present invention is to provide advantages of a nonmodular joint prosthesis, including the virtual absence of micromotion, and yet allow a surgeon performing revision surgery to change to a modular bearing without disturbing the base member and thereby jeopardizing fixation.




Another object of the invention is to extend the lifetime of an artificial joint.




These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a tibial base or tray with a release member slidably mounted thereon according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 1A

is an anterior view of a knee joint prosthesis including a modular bearing retained with the aid of a locking clip on the tibial base of

FIG. 1

with the release member removed therefrom.





FIG. 1B

is a top sectional view of the anterior portion of the tibial component of

FIG. 1A

further illustrating the locking clip.





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of a complete nonmodular tibial component according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a top view of the tibial component of

FIG. 2

with one side of the bearing cut away to reveal portions of the base and release member.





FIG. 4

is an anterior view of the tibial component of

FIG. 2

with one side of the bearing cut away to reveal portions of the base and release member and with the majority of the stem removed for illustration purposes.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of the tibial component taken along lines


5





5


in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a side view of an extractor together with a side cross-sectional view of the tibial component of

FIG. 2

illustrating the disengagement of the primary bearing from the base upon actuation of the release member with the aid of the extractor.





FIG. 7

is a perspective view of a tibial base or tray with a release member slidably mounted thereon according to a first alternative embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8

, is an anterior view of the tibial component of

FIG. 7

with one side of the primary bearing cut away to reveal portions of the base and release member.





FIG. 9

is a perspective view of a tibial base or tray with a release member slidably mounted thereon according to a second alternative embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 10

is an anterior view of the tibial component of

FIG. 9

with one side of the primary bearing cut away to reveal portions of the base and release member.





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a tibial base and modular bearing adapted for snap-fit interconnection.





FIG. 12

is a sectional view of one embodiment of a knee joint prosthesis in which a prefabricated bearing is retained on a tibial base with the aid of a threaded fastener.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.




With reference to

FIG. 1

, the preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a tibial base or tray


10


and a release member


12


slidably mounted on the intercondylar portion thereof on a smooth, flat superior surface


14


. Release member


12


includes a wedge portion


16


and extends between the anterior edge


18


of base


10


and a retaining rail


20


extending superiorly from the posterior edge of the base. Tibial base


10


includes a pair of posts


22


and


24


integrally formed on the superior surface


14


of the base at the anterior edge thereof. As shown in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

and as described in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,534, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the posts and rail are designed to cooperate to retain a modular bearing


23


on the base, the modular bearing preferably being preformed of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) with anterior and posterior recesses to receive the posts and rail, respectively, and with a uniformly flat inferior surface on its intercondylar and medial/lateral portions for direct contact with the superior surface


14


of the base. The modular bearing is designed to be locked in position with a transverse slide-in locking bar or clip


25


wedged between the posts and the bearing in opposed grooves provided therein for that purpose. Modular tibial trays and bearings as generally described above are commercially available from Biomet Inc., the assignee of the present invention, as components of the Maxim® Total Knee System, which includes various sizes and configurations of bases, bearings and stem extensions, as well as femoral and patellar components, for different patient requirements.




According to the present invention, a modular bearing is not implanted as the primary tibial bearing but instead is secured to the base during revision surgery after in vivo removal of a primary bearing which has preferably been molded over the base and the release member. Such a primary bearing


26


is shown in

FIG. 2

as part of a complete nonmodular tibial component according to the preferred embodiment of this invention. UHMWPE is also a suitable material for the primary bearing, which is preferably molded by direct compression molding in a conventional manner.




Release member


12


is preferably formed as a single piece with the thinner, anterior end


28


of wedge


16


integrally joined to an internally threaded drive block


30


and the thicker, posterior end


32


of the wedge integrally joined to a tail


34


which is sized and shaped to partially plug a transverse groove or channel


36


formed in the inwardly facing surface of rail


20


. The wedge suitably has an anterior-posterior length of approximately 0.5″, a width of approximately 0.5″, and a height of approximately 0.25″. The one-piece release member is suitably made of biocompatible titanium machined in a conventional manner, or may be cast cobalt-chromium. Its surfaces are preferably all smooth.




The shape of the release member is shown in greater detail in

FIGS. 3-6

, from which it can be appreciated that the molded bearing conforms to the shape of the base and release member, filling all exposed spaces within the mold cavity, which is sized with respect to the base to provide a skirt


38


which covers the peripheral edge of the base and fills an elongated anterior edge groove


40


, two medial/lateral edge grooves


42


and two posterior edge grooves


44


in the base as shown in the drawings. The skirt thus cooperates with other portions of the molded bearing, as will be described, to secure the bearing to the base. To the extent that any polyethylene wear debris may be produced at the bearing-base interface due to micromotion, the skirt also tends to contain such debris. The thickness of the skirt adjacent to each such groove, measured in the plane of the superior surface


14


of the tibial base, is suitably approximately 0.020-0.030″. The skirt thickness in that plane is correspondingly greater at the edge portions


41


and


43


of the base, where the edge of the base is cut away from its superior surface to the superior surface of a ledge


45


which partially defines the grooves. Preferably the inferior edge


46


of the skirt is trimmed after molding such that it is not flush with the interior surface


47


of the base, as will be explained, in order to minimize the chances of contact with bone cement during implantation.




Each peripheral edge groove


44


extends from the posterior end of its respective edge portion


43


to within 0.1″ of the adjacent edge of rail


20


. The base has no groove in its posterior edge between the medial and lateral edges of rail


20


, as perhaps best shown in FIG.


6


. The threaded hole


48


in block


30


is a #


12


-


24


hole and is plugged during the molding process by a set screw (not shown) which is later removed and which may, if desired, extend out of the hole virtually to the mold cavity wall to facilitate the creation of an access hole


50


for an extractor, as will be described, in the anterior surface of the bearing. A manual or automatic trimming step is contemplated to clear any residual polyethylene out of the desired hole


50


, which is suitably circular but may be square or otherwise shaped. The threaded hole in block


30


may be left unplugged in the tibial component as implanted.




Transverse groove


36


in rail


20


is partially plugged by tail


34


and partially exposed in the mold, as perhaps best illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 5

, and it is filled with polyethylene during the molding process to the extent so exposed. Anterior grooves


52


and posterior grooves


54


in posts


22


and


24


are entirely exposed and are thus entirely filled with polyethylene in the preferred embodiment during the molding process. Incidental molding of polyethylene also occurs in the space between the release member and the superior surface of the base at the medial and lateral edges of the inferior surface of the release member, which edges are chamfered to match the radius of curvature of posts


22


and


24


as best illustrated in FIG.


4


. The chamfered edges preferably extend the entire length of the release member. The inferior surface of the release member is otherwise smooth and flat. The medial and lateral edges of the superior surface of the wedge at its posterior end


32


may also be rounded if desired to maintain a particular bearing thickness at such points.




The portions of the molded primary bearing lying in the grooves in the posts and rail, including the portion of groove


36


directly posterior to tail


34


as well as the portions of groove


36


on either side of the tail, cooperate with each other and with the molded bearing portions in peripheral edge grooves


40


,


42


and


44


to secure the primary bearing on the tibial base. An example set of groove dimensions suitable for this purpose is set forth below:





















Groove No.




Height




Width




Depth





























36




.125″




.8″




.1″







40




.06″




2.2″




.04″







42




.06″




.4″




.04″







44




.06″




.5″




.04″







52




.125″




.3″




.05″







54




.1″




.25″




.1″















The dimensions in the above table are most suitable for a tibial base having a nominal size of 71 mm, i.e., a maximum medial/lateral dimension of 71 mm. The peripheral edge groove widths for other base sizes would preferably vary in approximate proportion to base size.




The tibial component with the bearing as shown in

FIG. 2

is designed for cases in which the posterior cruciate ligament is retained. Preferably, the same tibial base can accommodate bearings for cruciate-retaining applications and bearings for cruciate-substituting applications, where the tibial component is subjected to higher moments at the implant-bone interface. As is known in the art, the bearing in a cruciate-substituting prosthesis includes a stabilizing post which projects superiorly from the articulating surface level. With the knee loaded in a flexed position, such a stabilizing post experiences an anteriorly directed force due to the absence of the posterior cruciate ligament. The force creates a moment about the transverse axis through the posts on the base that, if not counteracted, would cause the posterior edge of the bearing to lift off of the base. The base and posterior stabilized bearing must cooperate to withstand the load that is normally carried by the posterior cruciate ligament, and the tibial base as described above is so designed.




More specifically, the tibial component with the base and release member as described above has a molded bearing retention force, measured in terms of the maximum anteriorly directed force against a posterior stabilized bearing that the tibial component can sustain without dissociation, in excess of 400 lbs., which is well above the maximum expected in vivo load of 320 lbs. This retention force has been measured in a worse-case scenario in which the base is made in the minimum size presently available in the Maxim® product line (59 mm) and the bearing is molded to the base with the maximum rated polyethylene thickness presently available in the Maxim® product line (24 mm), with no compressive load. The test is performed by connecting a Maxim® femoral component to the tibial component at 90° flexion and then loading the femoral component axially to create an anterior force against the stabilizing post on the tibial bearing. The retention force would be greater with larger base sizes.




Referring now to

FIG. 6

, the molded primary bearing is removed by actuation of the release member with the aid of an extractor


60


having a ball screw


62


enmeshed with a recirculating ball nut


64


that is nonrotatably mounted in a casing


66


having an axially extending prong


68


mounted on the distal end thereof on either side of the ball screw as a brace for the extractor. Each prong


68


has a pointed tip, one of which is partially cut away in

FIG. 6

to reveal a portion of a threaded nose on a conical adapter, as will be described below. A suitable ball screw for such purposes is commercially available from Thomson Saginaw Ball Screw Company, Inc., Saginaw, Mich., as Catalog No. 720426SS. A compatible ball nut is the Thomson Catalog No. 5708278 ball nut. A precision steel ball bushing bearing, Thomson Catalog No. A-81420, is mounted in the proximal end


70


of the casing to rotatably and slidably support an unthreaded proximal portion


72


of the ball screw shaft, and a T-handle


74


is mounted on that end of the ball screw shaft for rotation and consequent axial motion thereof. The tool preferably includes a releasable ratchet mechanism (not shown) to prevent clockwise rotation of the ball screw, thereby allowing the surgeon's grip on the T-handle to be temporarily released for repositioning during retraction of the ball screw. The ball screw shaft also has an unthreaded distal portion


76


on which is rotatably mounted an adapter


78


having an externally threaded nose


80


designed to engage the threaded drive block


30


of release member


12


in the tibial component. Access hole


50


in the bearing is formed with an inner diameter greater than the outer diameter of nose


80


for this purpose.




In operation, the ball screw is advanced sufficiently to position the nose of the adapter axially beyond the prongs, and the nose of the adapter is then inserted through circular hole


50


in the anterior surface of the bearing and threaded into drive block


30


by manual rotation of the adapter. The ball screw is then retracted with the aid of the T-handle, without rotating the adapter. The prongs indent and thus firmly engage the anterior surface of the bearing as the ball screw is retracted, and, with the spacing between the bearing and ball nut fixed by the prongs, the release member is accordingly pulled anteriorly, whereupon the action of the wedge causes the bearing to move superiorly and disengage from the base. The primary bearing is raised to the point of disengagement and then removed with the release member as a unit, as shown in FIG.


6


. With the extractor as described above, the maximum translational force required to be exerted to remove a molded primary bearing from a 71 mm tray is approximately 670 pounds, which corresponds to a torque of approximately 30 inch-pounds applied to the handle end of the ball screw shaft. This amount of torque is well within the capability of a surgeon or surgical assistant of normal strength.




Those skilled in the art will appreciate from FIG.


6


and the foregoing description that the translational force exerted by the extractor is applied between the bearing and the release member, thereby avoiding any disturbance to the base. The bearing is removed substantially in one piece, although fragments of polyethylene may remain on the base, such as in posterior grooves


54


of posts


22


and


24


. Any such fragments are easily removed, and the primary bearing is then replaced with a modular bearing and locking bar of the type described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,534.




Preferably the skirt on the molded primary bearing is trimmed after molding such that its inferior surface is not flush with the inferior surface


47


of the base, and, if desired, the skirt may be trimmed such that its inferior surface is flush with the superior surface of ledge


45


. When the tibial component is implanted, such trimming spaces the bearing apart from the tibial plateau and thus tends to minimize the chances of contact with bone cement, which is often applied to the tibial plateau to help secure the tibial base thereto and which may be present and exposed to some degree adjacent to the periphery of the base. As a result, the primary bearing can be removed by actuation of the release member, as described above, without significant risk of unwanted resistance from bone cement or of any removal or disturbance of bone cement. As an alternative to such trimming, the mold may be modified, if desired, to provide a correspondingly shorter skirt on the bearing.




The modular bearing has no skirt and is no wider than the tibial base, and is therefore slightly smaller than the primary bearing, which extends slightly beyond the peripheral edge of the base as described above and as shown, e.g., in

FIGS. 3 and 4

. Alternatively, the modular bearing may be made as wide as the primary bearing it is designed to replace, such that it likewise extends slightly beyond the peripheral edge of the base, albeit without a skirt.




A one-piece construction is preferred for the tibial base. The base may be machined from titanium with an integral stem but is preferably cast of cobalt-chromium. While a stem is a preferred part of the tibial component, the principles of the invention also apply to a stemless tibial base.




A first alternative embodiment of a nonmodular tibial component according to the present invention is shown in

FIGS. 7 and 8

. In this embodiment, a base


110


has an undercut portion


140


which is filled with polyethylene during the molding process and which cooperates with other molded bearing portions as in the preferred embodiment described above to secure the primary bearing on the tibial base. The undercut portion may extend around the entire hi periphery of the base or selected portions thereof. The construction of the tibial component, including release member


112


, posterior rail


120


, anterior posts


122


and


124


, and molded primary bearing


126


, is otherwise the same as that of the preferred embodiment described above. This.embodiment may be useful in certain applications, such as in uncemented tibial implants where there is no possibility of contact with bone cement.





FIG. 9

is a perspective view of a second alternative embodiment of a nonmodular tibial component according to the present invention. In this embodiment the release member


212


is provided with a pair of transverse arms


213


and


214


on the anterior end of the drive block


230


. The posterior sides of the transverse arms fill the anterior grooves in posts


222


and


224


provided at the anterior edge of the base


210


, and the anterior sides of the transverse arms are provided with respective cutting ridges


215


and


216


each of which extends the length of its arm, as shown in FIG.


9


. The cutting ridges are provided to facilitate passage of the anterior end of the release member through the anterior portion of the primary bearing


226


and thereby facilitate forward motion of the release member. A scalpel may be used during revision surgery to cut into or through the relatively thin layer of polyethylene (approximately 0.010-0.020″) covering the cutting ridge, if desired, to further facilitate the release action.




In this embodiment, tibial base


210


has a smooth, flat peripheral edge


218


rather than a grooved or undercut edge as in the previous embodiments. Base


210


and the rail


220


and posts


222


and


224


integrally formed thereon are otherwise the same as their counterparts in the preferred embodiment, as is release member


212


. Due to the smooth, flat edge and the transverse arms, this embodiment provides less retention force than the previous embodiments, which may be suitable in some circumstances such as in cruciate-retaining applications. The retention force could be increased in this or either prior embodiment by forming the release member without a tail that extends into the channel in the rail. However, in this embodiment the anterior portion of the bearing already tends to disengage from the base well before the posterior portion. It is believed more desirable in most applications to have the anterior and posterior portions of the primary bearing disengage from the tibial base at approximately the same time, i.e., with negligible tilting, as in the preferred embodiment.




The present invention also encompasses other forms of retainers and other methods of removing a molded primary bearing without removing the base. Other retainer forms presently contemplated as useful to varying degrees in certain applications include pegs, posts, holes or other recesses, dovetail configurations, tongue and groove configurations, mortise and tenon configurations, retaining walls, rails, detents, and snap ring grooves.




For example, while the intercondylar posts and rail of the preferred embodiment constitute the preferred form of modular bearing retainer according to the present invention, the retainer may alternatively be in the form of a raised flange or rim about other portions or all of the periphery of the tibial base, with a cavity in an inwardly facing surface of the flange or rim, wherein the modular bearing has a corresponding tongue or lip on its outer edge surface that fits into the cavity, as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,938,769 to Shaw or U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,468 to Hodorek et al. Referring to

FIG. 11

, tibial tray


312


has a raised flange


352


about its periphery and the flange is contoured at


353


to mate with corresponding contour


393


in bearing insert


311


and is provided with undercuts


354


and


354




a


to accept tongues


394


and


394




a


respectively, of the bearing insert. Bearing insert


311


is then received and retained by these snap-fit means. Alternatively, or in addition as disclosed in the latter patent, the modular bearing may be secured to the base with the aid of an auxiliary locking element in the form of a spring clip that interlocks a groove in the rim wall and a corresponding groove in the outer edge surface of the bearing. The clip is mounted in one groove so as to protrude therefrom and snap into the other groove when the modular bearing is pressed against the base. According to the present invention, the spring clip is preferably not incorporated in the primary tibial prosthesis, and the molded primary bearing preferably extends into the groove in the rim.




As another alternative, the base may be provided with a threaded hole or holes designed to cooperate with a screw or screws to securely retain a modular bearing in place after the molded primary bearing has been removed during revision surgery. Such screws thereby serve as auxiliary mechanical locking elements. For example, with reference to

FIG. 12

, a base


400


with an internally threaded stem


410


designed to retain a modular bearing


460


with the aid of a screw


418


, as disclosed in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,071 to Brown et al., may be modified to have an undercut peripheral edge and then placed in a mold adapted to provide a polyethylene skirt which covers the peripheral edge and extends into the undercut portion sufficiently to secure the bearing to the base. The threaded stem hole is first plugged with a set screw or otherwise sealed to prevent entry of polyethylene, such as by covering the hole with a stopper of titanium or other suitable material to withstand the heat and pressure in the mold without deformation or fusing to the base.




The molded primary bearing in the alternative embodiment just described is preferably removed in vivo by selectively cutting the skirt at the peripheral edge and then lifting the main portion of the bearing off of the base, using an osteotome if necessary or desired in conjunction with either a preformed slot or a slot that is cut or melted into the polyethylene at that time at the bearing-base interface to facilitate removal. A witness mark may be provided on the bearing edge surface at the time of molding to mark the level of the interface for such purposes. The set screw or stopper in the stem hole is removed after the primary bearing, and a modular bearing is then placed on the base and secured with a screw as described in the above-referenced Brown patent, which is hereby incorporated by reference along with the above-referenced patents to Shaw and Hodorek et al. The removal technique just described may be facilitated by the use of a C-clamp with an osteotome mounted on one end or jaw, with the C-clamp connected across the bearing, e.g., in contact with the medial and lateral edges of the bearing, with the tip of the osteotome inserted into a slot provided for that purpose or aligned with a witness mark. The opposing forces exerted by the C-clamp do not disturb the tibial base. This technique may also be used in lieu of a release member for removal of a bearing molded to any of the tibial bases of

FIGS. 1

,


7


or


9


.




Similarly, a pin may be placed through a coaxial pair of through holes in a modular bearing and base and held in position by a clip described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,061,271 to Van Zile, which patent is hereby incorporated by reference. The tibial base may have one or more dovetail surface members such as disclosed in the above-referenced Van Zile or Shaw patents.




The retainer may alternatively be designed to allow a modular bearing to float to some degree, either by translation or rotation. For example, a modular bearing may be rotatably mounted on a tibial base and retained thereon by means of an unthreaded hole in the surface of the base in cooperation with a mating stem on the inferior surface of the bearing. Peripheral edge grooves may be provided on the base and filled with polyethylene, as described above with reference to

FIG. 1

, in order to secure a nonmodular bearing to the base. Similar transversely oriented grooves may be provided at a desired depth within the hole in the base if desired. The nonmodular tibial prosthesis preferably includes a centrally mounted release member having a wedge and drive block similar to that shown in

FIG. 1

, with the wedge portion wider than the hole in the base.




Also, other forms of release members are contemplated, including one-piece and multi-piece mechanisms. For example, two wedges with complementary inclined surfaces could be provided with a counterdrive mechanism to force the wedges toward or away from each other, depending on their orientation, so as to jointly raise the bearing off of the superior surface of the base.




In another alternative embodiment, the molded primary bearing is adapted to be pulled directly away from the superior surface of the base with the aid of a release member in the form of a simple plate, e.g., a relatively thin disc, located between the bearing and base. A modified form of the extractor shown in

FIG. 6

is adapted to engage the plate through an access hole provided in the superior surface of the bearing as molded. The plate has a threaded hole with its axis perpendicular to the superior surface of the base, and is mounted in the intercondylar area of the base in place of the release member shown in

FIG. 1. A

#


12


-


24


hole is suitable as in the preferred embodiment. A through hole coaxial with the hole in the plate is provided in the superior surface of the bearing as an access hole for a threaded nose of an extractor as shown in

FIG. 6

but modified to have a longer nose for this purpose. The extractor is adapted to be aligned with the access hole axis with a fixed spacing between the extractor casing and the tibial base. This spacing may be maintained with prongs as shown in

FIG. 6

but spaced further apart so as to straddle the bearing and engage contact points provided on the base for this purpose. The contact points may, for example, be peripheral extensions of ledge


45


on the base of

FIG. 1

which are not covered with polyethylene during the molding process. If the prongs have pointed tips as in the embodiment of

FIG. 6

, each contact point on the base preferably has an indentation in its superior surface to receive a prong tip and fix its position in the transverse plane. The base is otherwise the same as shown in FIG.


1


.




In operation, the extractor is positioned with the prongs on the contact points on the base and the extended nose of the extractor threaded into the plate. The ball screw of the extractor is then retracted, whereby the plate exerts a superiorly directed force against the bearing and thus raises it off of the base surface. For this purpose, the shear area of the portion of the molded bearing above the plate is greater than the total shear area of the portions of the molded bearing in the grooves in the posts, rail and peripheral edges of the base.




As an alternative to prongs of the type shown in

FIG. 6

, the extractor may be provided with a pair of jaws with opposed sharp edges adapted to cut into the peripheral skirt on the bearing and engage the medial/lateral edge grooves


42


in the tibial base, whereby the extractor may be clamped to the base. With the nose of the extracter threaded into the plate, the primary bearing may be pulled directly away from the superior surface of the base along with the release plate upon retraction of the ball screw in the extractor.




Alternatively, the primary bearing may be removed in vivo by sectioning, reaming or grinding the bearing or key points thereof. For example, a bearing of the type shown in

FIG. 2

but molded to the base


10


without a release member thereon may alternatively be removed by sectioning. More specifically, a medial-lateral strip ¼″ to ½″ wide may be cut out of the bearing with a saw or mill, and the remaining anterior and posterior bearing portions may then be forced toward each other, and thereby disengaged from the posts, the rail and the edge grooves on the base, with the aid of pliers or a clamp adapted with prongs or otherwise to pierce or otherwise firmly engage the anterior and posterior bearing surfaces.




Reamers, saws and osteotomes may disturb a prosthesis or damage it, e.g., by scratching the smooth superior surface of a tibial base. Therefore, while methods involving such tools are options for revision procedures, it is preferred to incorporate a release member in the nonmodular prosthesis which allows a bearing to be removed without the application of force to the base member.




It is also contemplated that the nonmodular bearing may be secured in ways other than by molding in certain applications. For example, an interference fit may be provided between a preformed bearing and a mating base with the aid of a press in the factory. Thermally aided assembly is another alternative. For example, a barbed central post on the base may be heated so as to locally melt the polyethylene in a preformed bearing as the bearing is pressed onto it; upon cooling, the polyethylene is secured to the post and thereby to the base, which may be provided with ancillary retaining elements such as a retaining rim. A nonmodular prosthesis may also be fabricated using a permanent adhesive to secure a preformed bearing to a base. Such methods are considered possible although not preferred. A recess must be provided in the bearing's inferior surface for a release member if one is desired for the intended application.




While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.



Claims
  • 1. A tibial prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular device, comprising a tibial base having a modular bearing retainer on its superior surface, said tibial base having a posterior edge, said retainer including a raised portion at the posterior edge of said tibial base with a cavity in an inwardly facing surface thereof, a primary bearing secured to said tibial base, and means for removing said primary bearing from said tibial base substantially in one piece without disturbing said tibial base, wherein said removing means includes a wedge, and wherein said primary bearing is directly molded over said wedge.
  • 2. The prosthesis of claim 1, wherein said tibial base includes a flat intercondylar superior surface, wherein said wedge includes a flat inferior surface in contact with said flat superior surface of said tibial base, and wherein said wedge includes a posteriorly superiorly inclined superior surface in contact with a correspondingly inclined inferior surface of said primary bearing.
  • 3. The prosthesis of claim 2, wherein said wedge includes an anterior end, further comprising a threaded drive block integrally joined to the anterior end of said wedge.
  • 4. A tibial prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular device, comprising:a tibial base having a surface defining a retainer for a modular bearing; a primary bearing secured to said tibial base; and a mechanical release member mounted on said tibial base in contact with said primary bearing and adapted to exert a removal force on said primary bearing, wherein said release member includes a wedge, and wherein said primary bearing is directly molded over said wedge.
  • 5. The prosthesis of claim 4, wherein said tibial base includes a flat intercondylar superior surface, wherein said wedge includes a flat inferior surface in contact with said flat superior surface of said tibial base, and wherein said wedge includes a posteriorly superiorly inclined superior surface in contact with a correspondingly inclined inferior surface of said primary bearing.
  • 6. The prosthesis of claim 5, wherein said wedge includes an anterior end, further comprising a threaded drive block integrally joined to the anterior end of said wedge.
  • 7. A tibial prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular device, comprising:a tibial base having means for retaining a modular bearing thereon; a primary bearing secured to said tibial base; and release means for forcing said primary bearing away from said tibial base without disturbing said tibial base, wherein said release means includes a wedge, and wherein said primary bearing is directly molded over said wedge.
  • 8. The prosthesis of claim 7, wherein said tibial base includes a flat intercondylar superior surface, wherein said wedge includes a flat inferior surface in contact with said flat superior surface of said tibial base, and wherein said wedge includes a posteriorly superiorly inclined superior surface in contact with a correspondingly inclined inferior surface of said primary bearing.
  • 9. The prosthesis of claim 8, wherein said wedge includes an anterior end, further comprising a threaded drive block integrally joined to the anterior end of said wedge.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of patent application No. 09/173,940, filed Oct. 16, 1998, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (41)
Number Name Date Kind
4001896 Arkangel Jan 1977 A
4205400 Shen et al. Jun 1980 A
4459985 McKay Jul 1984 A
4479271 Bolesky et al. Oct 1984 A
4501031 McDaniel et al. Feb 1985 A
4711639 Grundei Dec 1987 A
4714474 Brooks, Jr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4795468 Hodorek et al. Jan 1989 A
4892547 Brown Jan 1990 A
4936853 Fabian et al. Jun 1990 A
4938769 Shaw Jul 1990 A
4959071 Brown et al. Sep 1990 A
4963152 Hofmann et al. Oct 1990 A
4997445 Hodorek Mar 1991 A
5007933 Sidebotham et al. Apr 1991 A
5061271 Van Zile Oct 1991 A
5080675 Lawes et al. Jan 1992 A
5108442 Smith Apr 1992 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5330534 Herrington et al. Jul 1994 A
5344461 Philpot Sep 1994 A
5387240 Pottenger et al. Feb 1995 A
5395401 Bahler Mar 1995 A
5413608 Keller May 1995 A
5443519 Averill et al. Aug 1995 A
5470354 Hershberger et al. Nov 1995 A
5549698 Averill et al. Aug 1996 A
5571200 Cohen et al. Nov 1996 A
5571201 Averill et al. Nov 1996 A
5609646 Field et al. Mar 1997 A
5639280 Warner et al. Jun 1997 A
5658342 Draganich et al. Aug 1997 A
5683470 Johnson et al. Nov 1997 A
5702463 Pothier et al. Dec 1997 A
5702464 Lackey et al. Dec 1997 A
5782925 Collazo et al. Jul 1998 A
5824103 Williams Oct 1998 A
5871545 Goodfellow et al. Feb 1999 A
5879394 Ashby et al. Mar 1999 A
5928286 Ashby et al. Jul 1999 A
6126692 Robie et al. Oct 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2702651 Sep 1994 FR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Windsor, Russell E. et al., “Revision of Well-fixed Cemented, Porous Total Knee Arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplastry, vol. 3, supplement, 1988, pp. S87-S94.
“Anatomic Axial Aligment Instrumentation,” Biomet brochure, Form Y-BMT-387/103194/M, ©1994.
“Maxim® the Complete Knee System—Design Rationale,” Biomet brochure, Form Y-BMT-440/061595/M ©1995.
“Maxim® the Complete Knee System,” Biomet brochure, Form Y-BMT-394R/121595/M ©1995.
“The HEDROCEL© Acetabular Cup—Solutions to Deficiencies in Contemporary Acetabular Cup Design and Materials,” Implex Corp., Oct. 21, 1997.
“Design Goal: Elimination of the Factors Contributing to THR Failure,” Implex Corp. advertisement, The American Journal of Orthopedics, Apr. 1998, vol. XXVII, No. 4, p. 245.
NexGen system, Design Rationale, Zimmer, cover and pp. F.22-F.23.
NexGen, Complete Knee Solution, Zimmer, cover and p. 25.
Johnson & Johnson Orthopeadics, P.F.C. Modular Total Knee System with SPECIALIST®, cover and p. 77.
Duracon ® The Tibial System, Howmedica, cover and p. 7.
Duracon® Knee System, Surgical Technique, Howmedic Osteonics, cover and p. 34.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/173940 Oct 1998 US
Child 09/303945 US