Not Applicable
Not Applicable
U.S. Pat. No. 7,733,145, Jun. 8, 2010—Abe et al.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,961,502, Jun. 14, 2011—Chua-Eoan
U.S. Pat. No. 8,174,872, May 8, 2012—Sakimura et al.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2012/0105105, May 3, 2012—Shukh Kang et al., CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 3rd edition, 2003.
A latch is a fundamental digital logic circuit of numerous logic devices such as microcontrollers, processors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and many others. In general, the latch is an electronic circuit that has two stable states and therefore can store one bit of information. Its output depends on both current and previous inputs. Such a circuit is described as a sequential logic. There are several designs of latch circuits such as SR-latch, JK-latch, D-latch, T-latch, etc. These circuits are mostly built using a complimentary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology employing complementary and symmetrical pairs of p-type and n-type of metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) for logic functions. A CMOS inverter is one of key elements of the latches. The conventional CMOS inverter is volatile.
The MR element 1J1 can comprise at least a free (or storage) layer 12 with a reversible magnetization direction (shown by a dashed arrow), a pinned (or reference) layer 14 with a fixed magnetization direction (shown by a solid arrow), and a nonmagnetic insulating tunnel barrier layer 16 sandwiched in-between. Resistance of the memory element 1J1 depends on a mutual orientation of the magnetization directions in the free 12 and pinned 14 layers. The resistance has a highest value (logic “1”) when the magnetization directions are antiparallel to each other, and the lowest value (logic “0”) when they are parallel. Hence the magnetization direction of the free layer 12 can have two stable logic states. It can be controlled by a direction of a spin-polarized current IS running through the element 1J1 in a direction perpendicular to layers surface (or plane). The direction of the current IS and hence the magnetization direction of the free layer 12 depends of the polarity of the input signal at the gates of the transistors 1P1 and 1N1.
When an input signal IN=1 (logic “1”) is applied to the common gate terminal of the transistors 1P1 and 1N1, the pMOS transistor 1P1 is “Off” and the nMOS transistor 1N1 is “On”. The spin-polarized current IS is running in the direction from the memory source VM to the source VSS. The current IS of this direction can force the magnetization direction of the free layer 12 in parallel to the magnetization direction of the pinned layer 14, which corresponds to a logic “0”. When the input signal is changed to IN=0 (a logic “0”), the pMOS transistor 1P1 turns “On” but the nMOS transistor 1N1 is “Off”. The spin-polarizing current IS is running in the opposite direction from the logic source VDD to the memory source VM. As a result, the magnetization direction of the free layer 12 can be forced in antiparallel to the magnetization direction of the pinned layer 14. This mutual orientation of the magnetizations corresponds to a high resistance state or to logic “1”. Hence, the logic value of the memory element 1J1 corresponds to a logic value at the output terminal of the conventional volatile CMOS inverter. The memory element 1J1 can provide a nonvolatile storage of the logic state of the inverter 10. The data may not be lost when the power is off.
CMOS-based latches are volatile. They can lose their data when the power is off. The present disclosure addresses to this problem.
Disclosed herein is a nonvolatile latch circuit that includes at least a first logic gate electrically coupled to a high voltage source at a first source terminal and to a low voltage source at a second source terminal, a second logic gate electrically coupled to the high voltage source at a first source terminal and to the low voltage source at a second source terminal, the first and second logic gates are electrically cross-coupled to each other, and a first nonvolatile memory element electrically coupled to an output terminal of the first logic gate at a first end and to an intermediate voltage source at a second end, wherein a logic state of the nonvolatile memory element is controlled by a bidirectional current running between the first and second ends of the memory element, and wherein an electrical potential of the intermediate voltage source is higher than that of the low voltage source but lower than that of the high voltage source.
Also disclosed is a nonvolatile latch circuit that includes a logic circuitry comprising at least an input signal terminal, a clock signal terminal, and an output terminal, the logic circuitry is electrically coupled to a high voltage source at a first source terminal and to a low voltage source at a second source terminal, and a nonvolatile memory element electrically coupled to the output terminal at a first end and to a intermediate voltage source at a second end, wherein a logic state of the latch circuit responds to an input signal during an active period of a clock signal, wherein a logic state of the nonvolatile memory element is controlled by a bidirectional current running between the first and second ends of the memory element, and wherein an electrical potential of the intermediate voltage source is higher than that of the low voltage source but lower than that of the high voltage source.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will be explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Note that in the following explanation the same reference numerals denote constituent elements having almost the same functions and arrangements, and a repetitive explanation will be made only when necessary.
Note also that each embodiment to be presented below merely discloses an device for embodying the technical idea of the present disclosure. Numerical order of the embodiments can be any. Therefore, the technical idea of the present disclosure does not limit the materials, shapes, structures, arrangements, and the like of constituent parts to those described below. The technical idea of the present disclosure can be variously changed within the scope of the appended claims.
Refining now to the drawings,
The MR element herein mentioned in this specification and in the scope of claims is a general term of a tunneling magnetoresistance element using a nonmagnetic insulator or semiconductor as the tunnel barrier layer.
The transistor-level circuit of the SR-latch 20 is shown in
For example, the 2-input NOR gate 21 comprises two pMOS transistors 2P1 and 2P2 connected in series and two nMOS transistors 2N1 and 2N2 connected in parallel to each other. Respectively, the 2-input NOR gate 22 comprises two pMOS transistors 2P3 and 2P4 connected in series to each other and two nMOS transistors 2N3 and 2N4 connected in parallel. The gate 21 further comprises an input terminal for applying a set input (S) and an output terminal
To provide a non-volatility to the SR-latch 20 two MR elements (or MTJs) 2J1 and 2J2 can be used. The MR element 2J1 is electrically coupled to the output terminal
If the set input S=1 (logic “1”) and the reset input R=0 (logic “0”), the output terminal of the NOR gate 22 will be forced to Q=1 (logic “1”) while the output terminal of the gate 21 is forced to
N+1
N
When the following combination of the input signal (S=1 and R=0) is applied, the pMOS transistor 2P1 of the NOR-gate 21 is “Off” but the nMOS transistor 2N1 is “On”, and
During an operation, the MR elements are written each time there is a change of the logic state to the latch. This can occur without any additional intervention by the circuitry. The resistance of the MR elements will then reflect the final logic state of the latch when power is removed.
The SR-latch circuit can be built by using two NAND gates instead of using two NOR gates.
The transistor-level circuit of the nonvolatile SR-latch 30 is shown in
The 2-input NAND gate 31 can comprise two pMOS transistors 3P1 and 3P2 connected in parallel and two nMOS transistors 3N1 and 3N2 connected in series to each other. Respectively, the 2-input NAND gate 32 comprises two pMOS transistors 3P3 and 3P4 connected in parallel to each other and two nMOS transistors 3N3 and 3N4 connected in series. The gate 31 further comprises an input terminal for applying a set input S and an output terminal Q. Respectively, the NAND gate 32 comprises a reset input terminal R and an output terminal
To provide a non-volatility to the SR-latch 30 two MR elements 3J1 and 3J2 can be used. The MR element 3J1 is electrically coupled to the output terminal Q of the NAND gate 31 at its first end and to a memory voltage source VM at its second end. The MR element 3J1 can provide a nonvolatile storage of a logic state of the output terminal Q. Respectively, the MR element 3J2 is electrically coupled to the output terminal
The transistor-level circuit diagram of the NAND-based SR-latch 30 is shown in
N+1
N
When the following combination of the input signals (S=0 and R=1) is applied, the pMOS transistor 3P1 of the NAND-gate 31 is “On” but the nMOS transistor 3N2 is “Off”. A spin-polarized current IS can occur in the MR element 3J1 running in the direction from the voltage source VDD to the voltage source VM. This direction of the current IS in the MR element 3J1 can force the magnetization direction of the free layer 12 (see
When a clock signal CLK=0 is applied to the clock terminal, the input signals S and R could not affect the logic state of the SR-latch 23 since the outputs of the AND gates 41 and 42 could remain at a logic “0”. When the clock signal CLK=1, the input signals S and R are permitted to be applied to the inputs of the SR-latch 23, hence the logic state of the latch can be changed. Note that as in the conventional SR-latch 20 shown in
A different implementation of the nonvolatile clocked NAND-based SR-latch is shown in
The nonvolatile SR-latches 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 suffer from the common problem. All of them have restricted combinations of the input signals S and R. This problem can be overcome by using JK-latch.
The J and K inputs of the latch 70 corresponds to the set and reset inputs of the SR-latches 20 and 30. When the clock is active (CLK=1), the latch 70 can be set with the input combination J=1 and K=0. The latch 70 can be reset when the following combination of the inputs signal is applied: CLK=1, J=0, and K=1. If the inputs signals J=K=0 during the active clock (CLK=1) are applied, the latch 70 can preserve its previous logic state. In case of input combination CLK=J=K=1, the latch 70 can switch its logic state due to feedback. The JK-latch 70 can hold its logic state when the clock is inactive CLK=0. The truth table of the JK-latch 70 is given in Table 3.
N
N+1
The transmission gate 92 is composed by an pMOS transistor 9P1 and nMOS transistor 9N1 connected in parallel to each other. The transmission gate 92 can be activated by the clock signal CLK=1. Contrarily, the transmission gate 96, composed by transistors 9P3 and 9N3 can be activated by the inverse of the clock signal
A gate-level circuit diagram of a nonvolatile NOR-based T-latch 130 is shown in
The latch circuits disclosed above (
The disclosed nonvolatile latch circuits comprise the nonvolatile memory elements disposed above a CMOS logic circuitry formed on a wafer. The embedded nonvolatile memory elements can have a marginal impact on a design and manufacturing process of the conventional volatile CMOS-based latch circuits.
While the specification of this disclosure contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosure or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
It is understood that the above embodiments are intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the embodiments should be, therefore, determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
While the disclosure has been described in terms of several exemplary embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Specifically, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the drawings herein are meant to be illustrative, and the spirit and scope of the disclosure are not limited to the embodiments and aspects disclosed herein but may be modified.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 61/493,405, filed on Jun. 3, 2011 by the present inventors.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6147900 | Pohm | Nov 2000 | A |
6175525 | Fulkerson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6317359 | Black et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343032 | Black et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6985382 | Fulkerson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7082053 | Jenne et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7663197 | Nagase et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7733145 | Abe et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755930 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7961502 | Chua-Eoan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8040154 | Chua-Eoan et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8174872 | Sakimura et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8295079 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20120105105 | Shukh | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2009028298 | Mar 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
S.-M. Kang, Y. Leblebici, CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits: Analysis and Design, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003 (655 pages). |
N.H.E. Weste, D.M. Harris, CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 4th edition, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2011 (838 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120307549 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61493405 | Jun 2011 | US |