Patent Grant
7279440
This invention relates to bonded nonwoven webs that include amorphous polymeric fibers, and to methods for making such webs.
The use of amorphous polymeric fibers in nonwoven fibrous webs often requires undesirable compromises in processing steps or product features. Known amorphous polymeric fibers are formed under conditions that result in uniform thermal properties (e.g., glass transition temperature) throughout the fibers. The uniform thermal properties of the fibers results in essentially simultaneous softening, thereby causing substantially the entire fiber to coalesce into a mass of polymer that loses its fibrous shape within a very small temperature range. Because the amorphous polymeric fibers lose their fibrous shape, during heat bonding, nonwoven fibrous webs that include known amorphous polymeric fibers must typically also include one or more components to assist with bonding or to provide a fibrous nature to the web.
For example, some nonwoven fibrous webs that include amorphous polymeric fibers as a predominant fiber in their construction may rely on the use of binders or other materials to bond the amorphous polymeric fibers within the web, thereby eliminating the need to heat the web to a temperature sufficient to soften and coalesce the amorphous polymeric fibers contained within the web. Disadvantages of this approach may include, however, the processing issues associated with applying and curing or drying the binder material. Another potential disadvantage is that the web includes materials other than the amorphous polymeric fibers, which may complicate recycling of the nonwoven webs due to the need to separate the different materials used in the finished web. Still another disadvantage is that the binder may leave the web more paperlike, stiff, brittle, etc. Furthermore, the binder may reduce the breathability of the web by at least partially occupying the interstices between the fibers of the web.
Some nonwoven fibrous webs include amorphous polymeric fibers mixed with other non-amorphous polymeric fibers, with the amorphous polymeric fibers being provided as a bonding agent. For example, the web may include non-amorphous polymeric fibers made of semicrystalline polymers, cotton, cellulose, etc., in addition to amorphous polymeric fibers. In these nonwoven fibrous webs, the amorphous polymeric fibers may be provided as a bonding agent, with the intent that the amorphous polymeric fibers, when heated, coalesce into masses of polymer that bind the other fibers together within the web. Nonwoven fibrous webs with such a construction may be point-bonded or wide area calendered. Wherever sufficient heat and pressure is applied to result in softening of the amorphous polymeric fibers within the web, the amorphous polymeric fibers will typically be substantially nonexistent because the amorphous polymeric fibers will have typically all coalesced to form the bonds between the other fibers within the web. For example, within the area occupied by a point bond, substantially all of the amorphous polymeric fibers will have coalesced to form the bond.
As with the use of separate binder materials, the use of amorphous polymeric fibers in combination with other fibers may increase the cost of the web, make the manufacturing operation more complex, and introduce extraneous ingredients into the webs. Further, the heat and pressure used to form the bonds can change the properties of the web, making it, e.g., more paperlike, stiff, or brittle.
The present invention provides nonwoven fibrous webs including amorphous polymeric fibers with improved and/or more convenient bondability. The nonwoven fibrous webs may consist essentially of amorphous polymeric fibers or they may include additional components in addition to amorphous polymeric fibers.
The amorphous polymeric fibers within the web may be autogeneously bonded or autogeneously bondable. The term “autogenous bonding” (and variations thereof) is defined as bonding between fibers at an elevated temperature as obtained in an oven or with a through-air bonder—also known as a hot-air knife—without application of solid contact pressure such as in point bonding or calendering, and preferably with no added binding fiber or other bonding material.
In contrast to known amorphous polymeric fibers, the amorphous polymeric fibers in the nonwoven fibrous webs of the invention may be characterized as varying in morphology over the length of continuous fibers so as to provide longitudinal segments that differ from one another in softening characteristics during a selected bonding operation. Some of these longitudinal segments soften under the conditions of a bonding operation, i.e., are active during the selected bonding operation such that they become bonded to other fibers of the web; and others of the segments do not soften, i.e., are passive during the bonding operation. In each of the continuous fibers, the active segments may be referred to as “active longitudinal segments” while the passive segments may be referred to as “passive longitudinal segments.” Preferably, the active longitudinal segments soften sufficiently under useful bonding conditions, e.g., at a temperature low enough, that the web can be autogenously bonded directly to other fibers in the web.
Also in contrast to known amorphous polymeric fibers, the fibers of the present invention are capable of retaining their fibrous shape after being autogeneously bonded within a web.
It may also be preferred that continuous fibers of the amorphous polymeric fibers have a uniform diameter. By “uniform diameter” it is meant that the fibers have essentially the same diameter (varying by 10 percent or less) over a significant length (i.e., 5 centimeters or more) within which there can be and typically is variation in morphology of the amorphous polymer.
The fibers are preferably oriented; i.e., the fibers preferably comprise molecules that are locked into (i.e., are thermally trapped into) an alignment extending lengthwise of the fibers. The amorphous polymeric fibers in nonwoven fibrous webs of the present invention may, for example, be characterized as including portions of rigid or ordered amorphous polymer phases or oriented amorphous polymer phases (i.e., portions in which molecular chains within the fiber are aligned, to varying degrees, generally along the fiber axis).
The term “fiber” is used herein to mean a monocomponent fiber; a bicomponent or conjugate fiber (for convenience, the term “bicomponent” will often be used to mean fibers that consist of two components as well as fibers that consist of more than two components); and a fiber section of a bicomponent fiber, i.e., a section occupying part of the cross-section of and extending over the length of the bicomponent fiber. Monocomponent fibrous webs are often preferred, and the combination of orientation and bondability offered by the invention makes possible high-strength bondable webs using monocomponent fibers. Other webs of the invention comprise bicomponent fibers in which an amorphous polymeric fiber is one or more component (or fiber section) of a multicomponent fiber. In those multicomponent fibers in which the amorphous polymeric fiber occupies only part of the cross-section of the fiber, the amorphous polymeric fiber is preferably continuous along the length of the fiber, with active and passive segments as discussed herein. As a result, the multicomponent fiber can perform bonding functions as described herein, with the amorphous polymeric portions of the multi-component fiber retaining its original fibrous shape after autogeneous bonding.
Nonwoven fibrous webs of the invention can be prepared by fiber-forming processes in which filaments of fiber-forming material are extruded, subjected to orienting forces, and passed through a turbulent field of gaseous currents while at least some of the extruded filaments are in a softened condition and reach their freezing temperature (e.g., the temperature at which the fiber-forming material of the filaments solidifies) while in the turbulent field. A preferred method for making fibrous webs of the invention may include a) extruding filaments of fiber-forming material; b) directing the filaments through a processing chamber in which gaseous currents apply an orienting stress to the filaments; c) passing the filaments through a turbulent field after they exit the processing chamber; and d) collecting the processed filaments; the temperature of the filaments being controlled so that at least some of the filaments solidify after they exit the processing chamber but before they are collected. It may be preferred that the processing chamber be defined by two parallel walls, at least one of the walls being instantaneously movable toward and away from the other wall and being subject to movement means for providing instantaneous movement during passage of the filaments.
In addition to variations in morphology along the length of a continuous fiber, there can be variations in morphology between different amorphous polymeric fibers of a nonwoven fibrous web of the invention. For example, some fibers can be of larger diameter than others as a result of experiencing less orientation in the turbulent field. Larger-diameter fibers often have a less ordered morphology, and may participate (i.e., be active) in bonding operations to a different extent than smaller-diameter fibers, which often have a more highly developed morphology. The majority of bonds in a fibrous web of the invention may involve such larger-diameter fibers, which often, though not necessarily, themselves vary in morphology. But longitudinal segments of less ordered morphology (and therefore lower softening temperature) occurring within a smaller-diameter varied-morphology fiber preferably also participate in bonding of the web.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a nonwoven fibrous web including amorphous polymeric fibers that are autogeneously bonded within the web, wherein the autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retain a fibrous shape after being autogeneously bonded.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a nonwoven fibrous web with amorphous polymeric fibers, wherein at least some continuous fibers of the amorphous polymeric fibers include one or more active longitudinal segments that bond to longitudinal segments of the same or others of the amorphous polymeric fibers, and further wherein the amorphous polymeric fibers have a fibrous shape within the web.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a nonwoven fibrous web with amorphous polymeric fibers, wherein at least some continuous fibers of the amorphous polymeric fibers exhibit at least one variation in morphology along their length such that the at least some continuous fibers include one or more active longitudinal segments that bond to longitudinal segments of the same or others of the amorphous polymeric fibers, and wherein the amorphous polymeric fibers have a fibrous shape within the web.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of making a nonwoven fibrous web by providing a plurality of amorphous polymeric fibers and autogeneously bonding the plurality of amorphous polymeric fibers within the web, wherein the autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retain a fibrous shape after bonding.
These and other features and advantages of the invention may be described below in connection with some illustrative embodiments of the invention.
The extrusion head 10 may be a conventional spinnerette or spin pack, generally including multiple orifices arranged in a regular pattern, e.g., straightline rows. Filaments 15 of fiber-forming liquid are extruded from the extrusion head and conveyed to a processing chamber or attenuator 16. As part of a desired control of the process, the distance 17 the extruded filaments 15 travel before reaching the attenuator 16 can be adjusted, as can the conditions to which they are exposed. Typically, some quenching streams of air or other gas 18 are presented to the extruded filaments by conventional methods and apparatus to reduce the temperature of the extruded filaments 15. Sometimes the quenching streams may be heated to obtain a desired temperature of the extruded filaments and/or to facilitate drawing of the filaments. There may be one or more streams of air (or other fluid)—e.g., a first stream 18a blown transversely to the filament stream, which may remove undesired gaseous materials or fumes released during extrusion; and a second quenching stream 18b that achieves a major desired temperature reduction. Depending on the process being used or the form of finished product desired, the quenching stream may be sufficient to solidify some of the extruded filaments 15 before they reach the attenuator 16. But in general, in a method of the invention extruded filamentary components are still in a softened or molten condition when they enter the attenuator. Alternatively, no quenching streams are used; in such a case ambient air or other fluid between the extrusion head 10 and the attenuator 16 may be a medium for any temperature change in the extruded filamentary components before they enter the attenuator.
The filaments 15 pass through the attenuator 16, as discussed in more detail below, and then exit. Most often, as pictured in
Between the attenuator 16 and collector 19 lies a field 21 of turbulent currents of air or other fluid. Turbulence occurs as the currents passing through the attenuator reach the unconfined space at the end of the attenuator, where the pressure that existed within the attenuator is released. The current stream widens as it exits the attenuator, and eddies develop within the widened stream. These eddies—whirlpools of currents running in different directions from the main stream—subject filaments within them to forces different from the straight-line forces the filaments are generally subjected to within and above the attenuator. For example, filaments can undergo a to-and-fro flapping within the eddies and be subjected to forces that have a vector component transverse to the length of the fiber.
The processed filaments are long and travel a tortuous and random path through the turbulent field. Different portions of the filaments experience different forces within the turbulent field. To some extent the lengthwise stresses on portions of at least some filaments are relaxed, and those portions consequently become less oriented than those portions that experience a longer application of the lengthwise stress.
At the same time, the filaments are cooling. The temperature of the filaments within the turbulent field can be controlled, for example, by controlling the temperature of the filaments as they enter the attenuator (e.g., by controlling the temperature of the extruded fiber-forming material, the distance between the extrusion head and the attenuator, and the amount and nature of the quenching streams), the length of the attenuator, the velocity and temperature of the filaments as they move through the attenuator, and the distance of the attenuator from the collector 19. By causing some or all of the filaments and segments thereof to cool within the turbulent field to the temperature at which the filaments or segments solidify, the differences in orientation experienced by different portions of the filaments, and the consequent morphology of the fibers, become frozen in, i.e., the molecules are thermally trapped in their aligned position. The different orientations that different fibers and different segments experienced as they passed through the turbulent field are retained to at least some extent in the fibers as collected on the collector 19.
Depending on the chemical composition of the filaments, different kinds of morphology can be obtained in a fiber. As discussed below, the possible morphological forms within a fiber include amorphous, rigid or ordered amorphous, and oriented amorphous. Different ones of these different kinds of morphology can exist along the length of a single continuous fiber, or can exist in different amounts or at different degrees of order or orientation. And these differences can exist to the extent that longitudinal segments along the length of the fiber differ in softening characteristics during a bonding operation.
After passing through a processing chamber and turbulent field as described, but prior to collection, extruded filaments or fibers may be subjected to a number of additional processing steps not illustrated in
Alternatively, fibers exiting the attenuator may take the form of filaments, tow or yarn, which may be wound onto a storage spool or further processed. Fibers of uniform diameter that vary in morphology along their length as described herein are understood to be novel and useful. That is, fibers having portions at least five centimeters long that have a 10-percent-or-less change in diameter but vary in morphology along that length, as indicated for example, by the presence of active and passive segments during a selected bonding operation, or by different degrees of order or orientation along the length, or by tests described later herein measuring gradations of density or of glass transition temperature range changes, are understood to be novel and useful. Such fibers or masses of fibers can be formed into webs, often after being chopped to carding lengths and optionally blended with other fibers, and combined into a nonwoven web form.
The apparatus pictured in
Although existing as two halves or sides, the attenuator functions as one unitary device and will be first discussed in its combined form. (The structure shown in
The attenuation chamber 24 may have a uniform gap width (the horizontal distance 33 on the page of
The length of the attenuation chamber 24 can be varied to achieve different effects; variation is especially useful with the portion between the air knives 32 and the exit opening 34, sometimes called herein the chute length 35. The angle between the chamber walls and the axis 26 may be wider near the exit 34 to change the distribution of fibers onto the collector as well as to change the turbulence and patterns of the current field at the exit of the attenuator. Structure such as deflector surfaces, Coanda curved surfaces, and uneven wall lengths also may be used at the exit to achieve a desired current force-field as well as spreading or other distribution of fibers. In general, the gap width, chute length, attenuation chamber shape, etc. are chosen in conjunction with the material being processed and the mode of treatment desired to achieve desired effects. For example, longer chute lengths may be useful to increase the crystallinity of prepared fibers. Conditions are chosen and can be widely varied to process the extruded filaments into a desired fiber form.
As illustrated in
In this illustrative embodiment, air cylinders 43a and 43b are connected, respectively, to the attenuator sides 16a and 16b through connecting rods 44 and apply a clamping force pressing the attenuator sides 16a and 16b toward one another. The clamping force is chosen in conjunction with the other operating parameters so as to balance the pressure existing within the attenuation chamber 24. In other words, under preferred operating conditions the clamping force is in balance or equilibrium with the force acting internally within the attenuation chamber to press the attenuator sides apart, e.g., the force created by the gaseous pressure within the attenuator. Filamentary material can be extruded, passed through the attenuator and collected as finished fibers while the attenuator parts remain in their established equilibrium or steady-state position and the attenuation chamber or passage 24 remains at its established equilibrium or steady-state gap width.
During operation of the representative apparatus illustrated in
In effect, one or both of the attenuator sides 16a and 16b “float,” i.e., are not held in place by any structure but instead are mounted for a free and easy movement laterally in the direction of the arrows 50 in
Many alternatives are available to cause or allow a desired movement of the processing chamber wall(s). For example, instead of relying on fluid pressure to force the wall(s) of the processing chamber apart, a sensor within the chamber (e.g., a laser or thermal sensor detecting buildup on the walls or plugging of the chamber) may be used to activate a servomechanical mechanism that separates the wall(s) and then returns them to their steady-state position. In another useful apparatus of the invention, one or both of the attenuator sides or chamber walls is driven in an oscillating pattern, e.g., by a servomechanical, vibratory or ultrasonic driving device. The rate of oscillation can vary within wide ranges, including, for example, at least rates of 5,000 cycles per minute to 60,000 cycles per second.
In still another variation, the movement means for both separating the walls and returning them to their steady-state position takes the form simply of a difference between the fluid pressure within the processing chamber and the ambient pressure acting on the exterior of the chamber walls. More specifically, during steady-state operation, the pressure within the processing chamber (a summation of the various forces acting within the processing chamber established, for example, by the internal shape of the processing chamber, the presence, location and design of air knives, the velocity of a fluid stream entering the chamber, etc.) is in balance with the ambient pressure acting on the outside of the chamber walls. If the pressure within the chamber increases because of a perturbation of the fiber-forming process, one or both of the chamber walls moves away from the other wall until the perturbation ends, whereupon pressure within the processing chamber is reduced to a level less than the steady-state pressure (because the gap width between the chamber walls is greater than at the steady-state operation). Thereupon, the ambient pressure acting on the outside of the chamber walls forces the chamber wall(s) back until the pressure within the chamber is in balance with the ambient pressure, and steady-state operation occurs. Lack of control over the apparatus and processing parameters can make sole reliance on pressure differences a less desired option.
In sum, besides being instantaneously movable and in some cases “floating,” the wall(s) of the processing chamber are also generally subject to means for causing them to move in a desired way. The walls can be thought of as generally connected, e.g., physically or operationally, to means for causing a desired movement of the walls. The movement means may be any feature of the processing chamber or associated apparatus, or an operating condition, or a combination thereof that causes the intended movement of the movable chamber walls—movement apart, e.g., to prevent or alleviate a perturbation in the fiber-forming process, and movement together, e.g., to establish or return the chamber to steady-state operation.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In one useful arrangement, the air cylinder 43a applies a larger clamping force than the cylinder 43b, e.g., by use in cylinder 43a of a piston of larger diameter than used in cylinder 43b. This difference in force establishes the attenuator side 16b as the side that tends to move most readily when a perturbation occurs during operation. The difference in force is about equal to and compensates for the frictional forces resisting movement of the bearings 38 on the rods 39. Limiting means can be attached to the larger air cylinder 43a to limit movement of the attenuator side 16a toward the attenuator side 16b. One illustrative limiting means, as shown in
Because of the described instantaneous separation and reclosing of the attenuator sides 16a and 16b, the operating parameters for a fiber-forming operation are expanded. Some conditions that would previously make the process inoperable—e.g., because they would lead to filament breakage requiring shutdown for rethreading—become acceptable; upon filament breakage, rethreading of the incoming filament end generally occurs automatically. For example, higher velocities that lead to frequent filament breakage may be used. Similarly, narrow gap widths, which cause the air knives to be more focused and to impart more force and greater velocity on filaments passing through the attenuator, may be used. Or filaments may be introduced into the attenuation chamber in a more molten condition, thereby allowing greater control over fiber properties, because the danger of plugging the attenuation chamber is reduced. The attenuator may be moved closer to or further from the extrusion head to control among other things the temperature of the filaments when they enter the attenuation chamber.
Although the chamber walls of the attenuator 16 are shown as generally monolithic structures, they can also take the form of an assemblage of individual parts each mounted for the described instantaneous or floating movement. The individual parts comprising one wall engage one another through sealing means so as to maintain the internal pressure within the processing chamber 24. In a different arrangement, flexible sheets of a material such as rubber or plastic form the walls of the processing chamber 24, whereby the chamber can deform locally upon a localized increase in pressure (e.g., because of a plugging caused by breaking of a single filament or group of filaments). A series or grid of biasing means may engage the segmented or flexible wall; sufficient biasing means are used to respond to localized deformations and to bias a deformed portion of the wall back to its undeformed position. Alternatively, a series or grid of oscillating means may engage the flexible wall and oscillate local areas of the wall. Or, in the manner discussed above, a difference between the fluid pressure within the processing chamber and the ambient pressure acting on the wall or localized portion of the wall may be used to cause opening of a portion of the wall(s), e.g., during a process perturbation, and to return the wall(s) to the undeformed or steady-state position, e.g., when the perturbation ends. Fluid pressure may also be controlled to cause a continuing state of oscillation of a flexible or segmented wall.
As will be seen, in the embodiment of processing chamber illustrated in
While apparatus as shown, in which the walls are instantaneously movable, are much preferred, the invention can also be run—generally with less convenience and efficiency—with apparatus using processing chambers as taught in the prior art in which the walls defining the processing chamber are fixed in position.
A wide variety of amorphous polymeric fiber-forming materials may be used to make fibrous webs of the invention. Suitable materials for forming the filaments include amorphous polymers such as polycarbonates, polyacrylics, polymethacrylics, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polychloroprene, random and block copolymers of styrene and dienes (e.g., styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)), butyl rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene monomer rubber, natural rubber, ethylene-propylene rubber, and mixtures thereof. Other examples of suitable polymers include, e.g., polystyrene-polyethylene copolymers, polyvinylcyclohexane, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylchloride, thermoplastic polyurethanes, aromatic epoxies, amorphous polyesters, amorphous polyamides, acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene (ABS) copolymers, polyphenylene oxide alloys, high impact polystyrene copolymers, polydimethyl siloxanes, polyetherimides, methacrylic acid-polyethylene copolymers, impact-modified polyolefins, amorphous fluoropolymers, amorphous polyolefins, polyphenylene oxide, polyphenylene oxide—polystyrene alloys, and mixtures thereof. Other potentially suitable polymers include, e.g., styreneisoprene block copolymers, styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene block copolymers (SEBS), styrene-ethylene-propylene-styrene block copolymers, styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers (SIS), styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) block copolymers, ethylene-propylene copolymers, styrene-ethylene copolymers, polyetheresters, and poly-u,-olefin based materials such as those represented by the formula —(CH2CHR)x where R is an alkyl group containing 2 to 10 carbon atoms and poly-a-olefin based on metallocene catalysts, and mixtures thereof.
Some polymers or materials that are more difficult to form into fibers by spunbond or meltblown techniques can be used, including, e.g., cyclic olefins (which have a high melt viscosity that limits their utility in conventional direct-extrusion techniques), block copolymers, styrene-based polymers, polycarbonates, acrylics, polyacrylonitriles, and adhesives (including pressure-sensitive varieties and hot-melt varieties). (With respect to block copolymers, it may be noted that the individual blocks of the copolymers may vary in morphology, as when one block is crystalline or semicrystalline and the other block is amorphous; the variation in morphology exhibited by fibers of the invention is not such a variation, but instead is a more macro property in which several molecules participate in forming a generally physically identifiable portion of a fiber.) The specific polymers listed here are examples only, and a wide variety of other polymeric or fiber-forming materials are useful. A further discussion of nonwoven fibrous webs made using other polymers that may include amorphous polymers is contained in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/151,782, filed on even date herewith and titled BONDABLE, ORIENTED, NONWOVEN FIBROUS WEBS AND METHODS FOR MAKING THEM. Interestingly, fiber-forming processes of the invention using molten polymers can often be performed at lower temperatures than traditional direct extrusion techniques, which offers a number of advantages.
Fibers also may be formed from blends of materials, including materials into which certain additives have been blended, such as pigments or dyes. As noted above, bicomponent fibers, such as core-sheath or side-by-side bicomponent fibers, may be prepared (“bicomponent” herein includes fibers with more than two components). In addition, different fiber-forming materials may be extruded through different orifices of the extrusion head so as to prepare webs that comprise a mixture of fibers. In other embodiments of the invention other materials are introduced into a stream of fibers prepared according to the invention before or as the fibers are collected so as to prepare a blended web. For example, other staple fibers may be blended in the manner taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,118,531; or particulate material may be introduced and captured within the web in the manner taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,373; or microwebs as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,813,948 may be blended into the webs. Alternatively, fibers prepared according to the present invention may be introduced into a stream of other fibers to prepare a blend of fibers.
Besides the variation in orientation between fibers and segments discussed above, webs and fibers of the invention can exhibit other unique characteristics. For example, in some collected webs, fibers are found that are interrupted, i.e., are broken, or entangled with themselves or other fibers, or otherwise deformed as by engaging a wall of the processing chamber. The fiber segments at the location of the interruption—i.e., the fiber segments at the point of a fiber break, and the fiber segments in which an entanglement or deformation occurs—are all termed an interrupting fiber segment herein, or more commonly for shorthand purposes, are often simply termed “fiber ends”: these interrupting fiber segments form the terminus or end of an unaffected length of fiber, even though in the case of entanglements or deformations there often is no actual break or severing of the fiber.
The fiber ends have a fiber form (as opposed to a globular shape as sometimes obtained in meltblowing or other previous methods) but are usually enlarged in diameter over the medial or intermediate portions of the fiber; usually they are less than 300 micrometers in diameter. Often, the fiber ends, especially broken ends, have a curly or spiral shape, which causes the ends to entangle with themselves or other fibers. And the fiber ends may be bonded side-by-side with other fibers, e.g., by autogenous coalescing of material of the fiber end with material of an adjacent fiber.
Fiber ends as described arise because of the unique character of the fiber-forming process illustrated in
The medially located longitudinal segments discussed above (often referred to herein simply as longitudinal segments or medial segments) differ from the just-discussed fiber ends, among other ways, in that the longitudinal segments generally have the same or similar diameter as adjacent longitudinal segments. Although the forces acting on adjacent longitudinal segments can be sufficiently different from one another to cause the noted differences in morphology between the segments, the forces are not so different as to substantially change the diameter or draw ratio of the adjacent longitudinal segments within the fibers. Preferably, adjacent longitudinal segments differ in diameter by no more than about 10 percent. More generally, significant lengths—such as, e.g., five centimeters or more—of fibers in webs of the invention do not vary in diameter by more than 10 percent. Such uniformity in diameter is advantageous, for example, because it contributes to a uniformity of properties within the web, and may also allow for a lofty and low-density web. Such uniformity of properties and loftiness may be further enhanced when webs of the invention are bonded without substantial deformation of fibers as can occur in point-bonding or calendering of a web. Over the full length of the fiber, the diameter may (but preferably does not) vary substantially more than 10 percent; but the change is gradual so that adjacent longitudinal segments are of the same or similar diameter. The longitudinal segments may vary widely in length, from very short lengths as long as a fiber diameter (e.g., about 10 micrometers) to longer lengths such as 30 centimeters or more. Often the longitudinal segments are less than about two millimeters in length.
While adjacent longitudinal segments may not differ greatly in diameter in webs of the invention, there may be significant variation in diameter from fiber to fiber. As a whole, a particular fiber may experience significant differences from another fiber in the aggregate of forces acting on the fiber, and those differences can cause the diameter and draw ratio of the particular fiber to be different from those of other fibers. Larger-diameter fibers tend to have a lesser draw ratio and a less-developed morphology than smaller-diameter fibers. Larger-diameter fibers can be more active in bonding operations than smaller-diameter fibers, especially in autogenous bonding operations. Within a web, the predominant bonding may be obtained from larger-diameter fibers. However, we have also observed webs in which bonding seems more likely to occur between small-diameter fibers. The range of fiber diameters within a web usually can be controlled by controlling the various parameters of the fiber-forming operation. Narrow ranges of diameters are often preferred, for example, to make properties of the web more uniform and to minimize the heat that is applied to the web to achieve bonding.
Although differences in morphology exist within a web sufficiently for improved bonding, the fibers also can be sufficiently developed in morphology to provide desired strength properties, durability, and dimensional stability. The fibers themselves can be strong, and the improved bonds achieved because of the more active bonding segments and fibers further improves web strength. The combination of good web strength with increased convenience and performance of bonds achieves good utility for webs of the invention. The amorphous polymeric fibers may include portions with molecular orientation sufficient to reach the rigid or ordered amorphous phase or the oriented amorphous phase, thereby increasing strength and stability of the web. Combination of such fibers in a web with autogenous bonds may provide further advantages for the nonwoven fibrous webs of the invention. The fibers of the web can be rather uniform in diameter over most of their length and independent from other fibers to obtain webs having desired loft properties. Lofts of 90 percent (the inverse of solidity and including the ratio of the volume of the air in a web to the total volume of the web multiplied by 100) or more can be obtained and are useful for many purposes such as filtration or insulation. Even the less-oriented fiber segments preferably have undergone some orientation that enhances fiber strength along the full length of the fiber.
In sum, fibrous webs of the invention generally include continuous fibers that have longitudinal segments differing from one another in morphology and consequent bonding characteristics, and that also can include fiber ends that exhibit morphologies and bonding characteristics differing from those of at least some other segments in the fibers; and the fibrous webs can also include fibers that differ from one another in diameter and have differences in morphology and bonding characteristics from other fibers within the web.
The final morphology of the fibers can be influenced both by the turbulent field and by selection of other operating parameters, such as degree of solidification of filament entering the attenuator, velocity and temperature of air stream introduced into the attenuator by the air knives, and axial length, gap width and shape (because, for example, shape influences the venturi effect) of the attenuator passage.
It is typically possible to form the nonwoven fibrous webs of the present invention solely through the use of autogenous bonds, e.g., obtained by heating a web of the invention without application of calendering pressure. Such bonds may allow softer hand to the web and greater retention of loft under pressure. However, pressure bonds as in point-bonding or area-wide calendering may also be used in connection with the webs of the present invention. Bonds can also be formed by application of infrared, laser, ultrasonic or other energy forms that thermally or otherwise activate bonding between fibers. Solvent application may also be used. Webs can exhibit both autogenous bonds and pressure-formed bonds, as when the web is subjected only to limited pressure that is instrumental in only some of the bonds. Webs having autogenous bonds are regarded as autogenously bonded herein, even if other kinds of pressure-formed bonds are also present in limited amounts. In general, in practicing the invention a bonding operation is desirably selected that allows some longitudinal segments to soften and be active in bonding to an adjacent fiber or portion of a fiber, while other longitudinal segments remain passive or inactive in achieving bonds.
More specifically, fiber 62 is depicted as being completely passive within the boundaries of
The intersection 70 between fibers 63, 64 and 65 will typically result in a bond because all of the fiber segments at that intersection are active (“intersection” herein means a place where fibers contact one another; three-dimensional viewing of a sample web will typically be needed to examine whether there is contacting and/or bonding). The intersection 71 between fibers 63, 64 and 66 will also typically result in a bond because fibers 63 and 64 are active at that intersection (even though fiber 66 is passive at the intersection). Intersection 71 illustrates the principle that, where an active segment and a passive segment contact each other, a bond will typically be formed at that intersection. That principle is also seen at intersection 72 where fibers 62 and 67 cross, with a bond being formed between the active segment of fiber 67 and the passive segment of fiber 62. Intersections 73 and 74 illustrate bonds between the active segments of fibers 65 and 67 (intersection 73) and the active segments of fibers 66 and 67 (intersection 74). At intersection 75, a bond will typically be formed between the passive segment of fiber 62 and the active segment of fiber 65. A bond will not, however, typically be formed between the passive segment of fiber 62 and the passive segment of fiber 66 that also cross at intersection 75. As a result, intersection 75 illustrates the principle that two passive segments in contact with each other will not typically result in a bond. Intersection 76 will typically include bonds between the passive segment of fiber 62 and the active segments of fibers 63 and 64 that meet at that intersection.
Fibers 63 and 64 illustrate that where two fibers 63 and 64 lie next to each other along portions of their lengths, the fibers 63 and 64 will typically bond provided that one or both of the fibers are active (such bonding may occur during preparation of the fibers). As a result, fibers 63 and 64 are depicted as bonded to each other between intersections 71 and 76 because both fibers are active over that distance. In addition, at the upper end of
Analytical comparisons may be performed on different segments (internal segments as well as fiber ends) of fibers of the invention to show the different characteristics and properties. A variation in density often accompanies the variation in morphology of fibers of the invention, and the variation in density can typically be detected by a Test for Density Gradation Along Fiber Length (sometimes referred to more shortly as the Graded Density test), defined herein. This test is based on a density-gradient technique described in ASTM D1505-85. The technique uses a density-gradient tube, i.e., a graduated cylinder or tube filled with a solution of at least two different-density liquids that mix to provide a gradation of densities over the height of the tube. In a standard test, the liquid mixture fills the tube to at least a 60-centimeter height so as to provide a desired gradual change in the density of the liquid mixture. The density of the liquid should change over the height of the column at a rate between about 0.0030 and 0.0015 gram/cubic centimeter/centimeter of column height. Pieces of fiber from the sample of fibers or web being tested are cut in lengths of 1 millimeter and dropped into the tube. Webs are sampled in at least three places at least three inches (7.62 centimeters) apart. The fibers are extended without tension on a glass plate and cut with a razor knife. A glass plate 40 mm long, 22 mm wide, and 0.15 mm thick is used to scrape the cut fiber pieces from the glass plate on which they were cut. The fibers are deionized with a beta radiation source for 30 seconds before they are placed in the column.
The fibers are allowed to settle in place for 48 hours before measurements of density and fiber position are made. The pieces settle in the column to their density level, and they assume a position varying from horizontal to vertical depending on whether they vary in density over their length: constant-density pieces assume a horizontal position, while pieces that vary in density deviate from horizontal and assume a more vertical position. In a standard test, twenty pieces of fiber from a sample being tested are introduced into the density-gradient tube. Some fiber pieces may become engaged against the tube wall, and other fiber pieces may become bunched with other fiber pieces. Such engaged or bunched fibers are disregarded, and only the free pieces—not engaged and not bunched—are considered. The test must be re-run if less than half the twenty pieces introduced into the column remain as free pieces.
Angular measurements are obtained visually to the nearest 5-degree increment. The angular disposition of curved fibers-is based on the tangent at the midpoint of the curved fiber. In the standard test of fibers or webs of the invention, at least five of the free pieces generally will assume a position at least thirty degrees from horizontal in the test. More preferably, at least half of the free pieces assume such a position. Also, more preferably the pieces (at least five and preferably at least half the free pieces) assume a position 45 degrees or more from horizontal, or even 60 or 85 degrees or more from horizontal. The greater the angle from horizontal, the greater the differences in density, which tends to correlate with greater differences in morphology, thereby making a bonding operation that distinguishes active from passive segments more likely and more convenient to perform. Also, the higher the number of fiber pieces that are disposed at an angle from horizontal, the more prevalent the variation in morphology tends to be, which further assists in obtaining desired bonding.
Different fiber segments may also exhibit differences in morphology that can be detected based on differences in properties as measured by Modulated Differential Scanning Calorimetry (MDSC). For example, data was obtained using unprocessed amorphous polymers (i.e., pellets of the polymers used to form the fibers of the present invention), amorphous polymeric fibers manufactured according to the present invention, and the amorphous polymeric fibers of the invention after simulated bonding (heating to simulate, e.g., an autogeneous bonding operation).
A difference in the thermal properties between the amorphous polymeric fibers as formed and the amorphous polymeric fibers after simulated bonding can suggest that processing to form the fibers significantly affects the amorphous polymeric material in a manner that improves its bonding performance. All MDSC scans of the fibers as formed and the fibers after simulated bonding presented significant thermal stress release which may be proof of significant levels of orientation in both the fibers as formed and the fibers after simulated bonding. That stress release may, for example, be evidenced by shifts up or down in the glass transition range when comparing the amorphous polymeric fibers as formed with the amorphous polymeric fibers after simulated bonding. Although not wishing to be bound by theory, it may be described that portions of the amorphous polymeric fibers of the present invention exhibit ordered local packing of the molecular structures, sometimes referred to as a rigid or ordered amorphous fraction as a result of the combination thermal treatment and orientation of the filaments during fiber formation (see, e.g., P. P. Chiu et al., Macromolecules, 33, 9360-9366).
The thermal behavior of the amorphous polymer used to manufacture the fibers was significantly different than the thermal behavior of the amorphous polymeric fibers before or after simulated bonding. That thermal behavior may preferably include, e.g., changes in the glass transition range. As such, it may be advantageous to characterize the amorphous polymeric fibers of the present invention as having a broadened glass transition range in which, as compared to the polymer before processing, both the onset temperature (i.e., the temperature at which the onset of softening occurs) and the end temperature (i.e., the temperature at which substantially all of the polymer reaches the rubbery phase), of the glass transition range for the amorphous polymeric fibers move in a manner that increases the overall glass transition range. In other words, the onset temperature decreases and the end temperature increases. In some instances, it may be sufficient that only the end temperature of the glass transition range increases.
The broadened glass transition range may provide a wider process window in which autogeneous bonding may be performed while the amorphous polymeric fibers retain their fibrous shape (because all of the polymer in the fibers does not soften within the narrower glass transition range of known fibers). It should be noted that the broadened glass transition range is preferably measured against the glass transition range of the starting polymer after it has been heated and cooled to remove residual stresses that may be present as a result of, e.g., processing of the polymer into pellets for distribution.
Again, not wishing to be bound by theory, it may be considered that orientation of the amorphous polymer in the fibers may result in a lowering of the onset temperature of the glass transition range. At the other end of the glass transition range, those portions of the amorphous polymeric fibers that reach the rigid or ordered amorphous phase as a result of processing as described above may provide the raised end temperature of the glass transition range. As a result, changes in drawing or orientation of the fibers during manufacturing may be useful to modify the broadening of the glass transition range, e.g., improve the broadening or reduce the broadening.
Upon bonding of a web of the invention by heating it in an oven, the morphology of the fiber segments may be modified. The heating of the oven has an annealing effect. Thus, while oriented amorphous fibers may have a tendency to shrink upon heating (which can be minimized by the presence of rigid or ordered amorphous phase for the amorphous polymer of the fibers), the annealing effect of the bonding operation, together with the stabilizing effect of the bonds themselves, can reduce shrinkage.
The average diameter of fibers prepared according to the invention may range widely. Microfiber sizes (about 10 micrometers or less in diameter) may be obtained and offer several benefits; but fibers of larger diameter can also be prepared and are useful for certain applications; often the fibers are 20 micrometers or less in diameter. Fibers of circular cross-section are most often prepared, but other cross-sectional shapes may also be used. Depending on the operating parameters chosen, e.g., degree of solidification from the molten state before entering the attenuator, the collected fibers may be rather continuous or essentially discontinuous.
Various processes conventionally used as adjuncts to fiber-forming processes may be used in connection with filaments as they enter or exit from the attenuator, such as spraying of finishes or other materials onto the filaments, application of an electrostatic charge to the filaments, application of water mists, etc. In addition, various materials may be added to a collected web, including bonding agents, adhesives, finishes, and other webs or films.
Although there typically is no reason to do so, filaments may be blown from the extrusion head by a primary gaseous stream in the manner of that used in conventional meltblowing operations. Such primary gaseous streams cause an initial attenuation and drawing of the filaments.
The following examples are provided to enhance understanding of the present invention. They are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Apparatus as shown in
The distance between the die and attenuator (dimension 17 in
The attenuator gap at the top was 1.6 mm (dimension 33 in
Fibrous webs were collected on a conventional porous web-forming collector in an unbonded condition. The webs were then heated in an oven at 300° C. for 1 minute. The latter step caused autogenous bonding within the webs as illustrated in
To illustrate the variation in morphology exhibited along the length of the fibers, a gravimetric analysis was performed using the Graded Density test described above. The column contained a mixture of water and calcium nitrate solution according to ASTM D1505-85. Results for twenty pieces moving from top to bottom within the column are given in Table 1.
The average angle of the fibers was 85.5 degrees, the median was 85 degrees.
Apparatus as shown in
The distance between the die and attenuator (dimension 17 in
The attenuator gap at the top was 4.4 mm (dimension 33 in
Fibrous webs were collected on a conventional porous web-forming collector in an unbonded condition. The webs were then heated in an oven at 200° C. for 1 minute. The latter step caused autogenous bonding within the webs, with the autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retaining their fibrous shape after bonding.
To illustrate the variation in morphology exhibited along the length of the fibers, a gravimetric analysis was performed using the Graded Density test described above. The column contained a mixture of water and calcium nitrate solution according to ASTM D1505-85. Results for twenty pieces moving from top to bottom within the column are given in Table 2.
The average angle of the fibers was 83 degrees, the median was 85 degrees.
Apparatus as shown in
The distance between the die and attenuator (dimension 17 in
The attenuator gap at the top was 7.6 mm (dimension 33 in
Fibrous webs were collected on a conventional porous web-forming collector, with the fibers autogenously bonding as the fibers were collected. The autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retained their fibrous shape after bonding.
To illustrate the variation in morphology exhibited along the length of the fibers, a gravimetric analysis was performed using the Graded Density test described above. The column contained a mixture of methanol and water according to ASTM D1505-85. Results for twenty pieces moving from top to bottom within the column are given in Table 3.
The average angle of the fibers was 45 degrees, the median was 45 degrees.
Apparatus as shown in
The distance between the die and attenuator (dimension 17 in
The attenuator gap at the top was 0.07 (1.8 mm) (dimension 33 in
Fibrous webs were collected on a conventional porous web-forming collector in an unbonded condition. The webs were then heated in an oven at 200° C. for 1 minute. The latter step caused autogenous bonding within the webs, with the autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retaining their fibrous shape after bonding.
To illustrate the variation in morphology exhibited along the length of the fibers, a gravimetric analysis was performed using the Graded Density test described above. The column contained a mixture of water and calcium nitrate solution according to ASTM D1505-85. Results for twenty pieces moving from top to bottom within the column are given in Table 4.
The average angle of the fibers was 89 degrees, the median was 90 degrees.
Apparatus as shown in
The distance between the die and attenuator (dimension 17 in
The attenuator gap at the top was 0.147 inch (3.73 mm) (dimension 33 in
Fibrous webs were collected on a conventional porous web-forming collector in an unbonded condition. The webs were then heated in a through-air bonder at 100° C. for 1 minute. The latter step caused autogenous bonding within the webs, with the autogeneously bonded amorphous polymeric fibers retaining their fibrous shape after bonding.
Testing using a TA Instruments Q1000 Differential Scanning Calorimeter was conducted to determine the effect of processing on the glass transition range of the polymer. A linear heating rate of 5° C. per minute was applied to each sample, with a perturbation amplitude of ±1° C. every 60 seconds. The samples were subjected to a heat-cool-heat profile ranging from 0° C. to about 150° C.
The results of testing on the bulk polymer, i.e., polymer that is not formed into fibers and the polymers formed into fibers (before and after simulated bonding) are depicted in
The preceding specific embodiments are illustrative of the practice of the invention. This invention may be suitably practiced in the absence of any element or item not specifically described in this document. The complete disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and publications are incorporated into this document by reference as if individually incorporated. Various modifications and alterations of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of this invention. It should be understood that this invention is not to be unduly limited to illustrative embodiments set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3322607 | Jung | May 1967 | A |
| 3734803 | Lipscomb et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3766606 | Piper et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3783649 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3855045 | Brock | Dec 1974 | A |
| 4064604 | Hartman | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4086381 | Cheshire et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4147749 | Lipscomb et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4163819 | Yung et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4189338 | Ejima et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4340563 | Appel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4405297 | Appel et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4622259 | McAmish et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4692371 | Morman et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4988560 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5160746 | Dodge, II et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5173356 | Eaton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5296286 | Allen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5460500 | Geus et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5635290 | Stopper et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5652051 | Shawver et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5679299 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5714107 | Levy et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5853635 | Morell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5935512 | Haynes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5958322 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6057256 | Krueger et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6165217 | Hayes | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6183684 | Lu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6274238 | DeLucia | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6379136 | Najour et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6607624 | Berrigan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6667254 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 20020102897 | Berrigan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 40 14 414 | Nov 1991 | DE |
| 0 538 480 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 1 138 813 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| WO 0077285 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 02 055782 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030216099 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
