Normalizing capacitive sensor array signals

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE46317
  • Patent Number
    RE46,317
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 3, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 21, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
An embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for reporting position information. Position information received from a plurality of capacitive sensors in an array of capacitive sensors is adjusted based on predetermined adjustment values to generate adjusted position information. Each predetermined adjustment value is associated with at least one of the plurality of capacitive sensors. A signal representative of the adjusted position information is generated. In another embodiment, the sensitivity of at least one of the capacitive sensors is adjusted based on the position of the at least one capacitive sensor within the array.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to capacitive sensor arrays.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

As computing technology has developed, user interface devices have advanced correspondingly. User interfaces have become increasingly significant in the usability of a computing device.


One particular user interface becoming increasingly popular is touch screen or track pad which uses an array of capacitive sensors using high impedance capacitance substrates. The sensor array is typically connected to detection logic via a portion of the sides of the array. The sensor array is divided up into rows and columns each with corresponding capacitive sensing elements. In order for a signal of a capacitive sensing element to be processed, the signal must travel though the rest of the row or column to be received by the detection logic. The greater the distance from the connection of the sensor array, the greater signal loss that occurs due to series impedance as the signal travels through the array to the detector logic. For example, for a sensor array having connections on the bottom and right, signals registered in the upper left corner will experience signal loss as the signals travel through the array connections. In contrast, signals registered at the bottom right of the array will have much less signal loss. The non-uniform signal loss characteristic may lead to inaccurate position determination across the face of the user interface panel. For an array of high impedance row and column sensors, the reduction in sensitivity occurs worse at the corner that is furthest away from the detection logic connection.


Thus, conventional user interface designs have signal loss issues as signals from sensors remote from the connection of a sensory array are impacted by the series impedance of the sensor array.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention are directed to a system and method for processing position signal information using high impedance capacitive sensors. The processing of the signal information overcomes the signal loss caused by series impedance of an array of capacitive sensors. Embodiments of the present invention thus facilitate accurate reporting of position information from an array of capacitive sensors that utilize high impedance capacitive substrates.


More specifically, an embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for processing a position signal. The method includes receiving a first position signal from a capacitive sensor and determining a proximity of the capacitive sensor to a connection of an array of capacitive sensors. The sensitivity of the capacitive sensor is then adjusted (e.g., by adjusting the scan time) and a second position signal (e.g., including a more sensitive sensor reading) is received from the capacitive sensor. The second position signal may then be reported.


Another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for processing position information using capacitive sensors. The system includes a position signal receiver for receiving a position signal from an array of capacitive sensors and a position information module for accessing information corresponding with the position signal. The information may include values to be applied to the position signal. The system further includes a sensor sensitivity control module for adjusting the sensitivity of a capacitive sensor (e.g., adjusting the scan time or applying a value corresponding to the location of a sensor) and a position signal reporting module for reporting the position signal to a coupled device (e.g., computing device).


Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for reporting position information using capacitive sensors. The method includes receiving position information from a capacitive sensor and accessing a value corresponding to the position information. The value accessed may correspond to the location of the capacitive sensor within an array of capacitive sensors. The method further includes adjusting the position information based on the value corresponding to the position information and reporting the adjusted position information.


Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for processing a position signal. The method includes receiving a first position signal from a plurality of active capacitive sensors and determining a proximity of the plurality of active capacitive sensors to a connection of an array of capacitive sensors. The method further includes adjusting the sensitivity of the active capacitive sensors and receiving a second position from the plurality of active capacitive sensors. The second position signal (e.g., more sensitive signal) may then be reported.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 shows block diagram of an exemplary capacitive sensor array, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary sensor circuit, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary timing diagram or voltage graph of a capacitor of the exemplary sensor circuit of FIG. 2, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows the exemplary sensor circuit of FIG. 2 with an equivalent resistance during phase 1, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows another exemplary sensor circuit, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows the exemplary sensor circuit of FIG. 5 with an equivalent resistance, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a system for processing position information, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of an exemplary process for reporting position information, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of an exemplary process for processing a position signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of an exemplary process for processing a position signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the claimed subject matter, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter to these embodiments. On the contrary, the claimed subject matter is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter as defined by the claims. Furthermore, in the detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the claimed subject matter. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the claimed subject matter may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the claimed subject matter.



FIG. 1 shows block diagram of an exemplary capacitive sensor array, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Capacitive sensor array 100 may provide a user interface (e.g., touchpad, track pad, touch screen, and the like) for a variety of devices including, but not limited to, servers, desktop computers, laptops, tablet PCs, mobile devices, music devices, video devices, cellular telephones, and smartphones etc. Capacitive sensor array 100 may include a plurality of sensor elements in a row and column configuration that utilize a high impedance capacitance substrate. Another possible structure for a capacitive sensing array is described in US Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0229470.


Sensor capacitor 102 illustrates an exemplary capacitive sensor cell in capacitive sensor array 100. Capacitive sensor array 100 may be configured in a variety of ways including, but not limited to, a square, a rectangle, a circle, or a ring etc. Connections 104 facilitate coupling of capacitive sensor array 100 to detection logic for detecting and reporting a user contact and its position to a coupled device (e.g., computing device).


In one embodiment, capacitive sensor array 100 is made of a material having an impedance which impacts signals received from sensor circuits remote from connections 104. For example, signals from sensor circuits in the upper left of capacitive sensor array 100 may be reduced or impacted by series impedance as the signal travels through the array to connections 104. It is appreciated that as the distance between connections 104 and a sensor of capacitive sensor circuit array 100 increases, the impact of the series impedance of capacitive sensor array 100 increases. Embodiments of the present invention address this decrease in sensitivity to provide a more accurate position determination.


Example Circuits



FIGS. 2 and 4-6 illustrate example components used by various embodiments of the present invention. Although specific components are disclosed in circuits 200, 400, 500, and 600 it should be appreciated that such components are examples. That is, embodiments of the present invention are well suited to having various other components or variations of the components recited in systems 200, 400, 500, and 600. It is appreciated that the components in systems 200, 400, 500, and 600 may operate with other components than those presented, and that not all of the components of systems 200, 400, 500, and 600 may be required to achieve the goals of systems 200, 400, 500, and 600.



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary sensor circuit 200, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Sensor circuit 200 includes Vdd signal 202, current source 204, comparator 208, timer 210, data processing module 212, oscillator 214, reference voltage 226, external modification capacitor 216, ground signal 224, sensor capacitor 222 (located in the sensor array), switch 220 and switch 218. Current source 204 may be a current DAC (Digital to Analog converter). Circuits of the type shown in FIG. 2 are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,307,485 and 7,375,535.


In one embodiment, circuit 200 may operate in three phases. In a first phase (See 302, FIG. 3), switch 218 alternatively couples current source 204 to sensor capacitor 222 and current source 204 charges or settles external modification capacitor 216 to a start voltage, Vstart. In one embodiment, the start voltage may be governed the voltage current function expressed by:







V
Start

=


1

f
·

C
x



·
iDAC






Where f is the frequency of the switching of switch 218, Cx is the capacitance of the sensor capacitor 222, and iDAC is the current of current source 204.


It is appreciated that the capacitance of sensor capacitor 222 (one of the capacitors of array 100 of FIG. 1) varies with the presence of objects (e.g., a finger). For example, the presence of a finger may increase the capacitance and thereby result in a lower starting voltage. Conversely, a higher starting voltage may result from no finger being present.


In a second phase (See 304, FIG. 3), the sensor capacitor 222 is decoupled from current source 204 by switch 218 and sensor capacitor 222 is discharged by coupling to ground signal 224 via switch 220. External modification capacitor 216 may be charged by current source 204 until the voltage across it increases to reference voltage 226 at which time comparator 208 is tripped which disables timer 210. In one embodiment, voltage on the external modification capacitor 216 is reduced through a low pass filter in series with external modification capacitor 216 to the input of comparator 208.


In one embodiment, timer 210 is a counter (e.g., 16-bit). The raw number of counts on timer 210 measures the time required from Vstart to Vref (reference voltage 226) and may be used to determine if a finger is present on sensor capacitor 222. The raw counts are taken after each measurement sequence (e.g., after each charge of sensor capacitor 222 and tripping of comparator 208) and then compared to a stored baseline number of counts with no finger present on sensor capacitor 222. If the difference between the raw counts and the baseline counts exceeds a threshold, then sensor activation is detected for that sensor. The value of the counter may measure how long it took for the voltage across external modification capacitor 216 to reach the threshold or reference voltage 226 and can then be used to determine what the start voltage was which is a measure of whether or not a finger was present.


For example, when no finger is present, 100 cycles may be required to bring the voltage across external modification capacitor 216 to reference voltage 226. When a finger is present, 105 cycles may be required to bring the voltage across external modification capacitor 216 to reference voltage 226. If there is a threshold of three cycles to indicate the presence of an object, as long as the number of the change in cycles is greater than three, the sensor may be determined or considered to be active. It is appreciated that a difference threshold larger than zero prevents noise or other interference from appearing as an active sensor.


The time (or count) measured by timer 210 may be used by data processing module 212 to the detection logic to process the data and make decisions based on the capacitive inputs (e.g., sensors triggered by presence of a finger). Lower starting voltages (e.g., when a finger is present) lead to longer charge times as the current from the current source 204 flows into the external modification capacitor 216 and increases the voltage at the same rate. If the start voltage is low, the time or count measured by timer 210 will be relatively large because current source 204 will have to provide more charge to external modification capacitor 216 to reach reference voltage 226. If the start voltage is relatively high (e.g., no finger present), the time or count measured by time 210 is low as current source 204 provides less current to external modification capacitor 216 to reach reference voltage 226.


In a third phase (See 306, FIG. 3), the sensor scan is completed and current source 204 is turned off. During the third phase, the time or count from timer 210 may be processed and stored. Voltage on the external modification capacitor 216 decreases as charge dissipates by leakage currents until the next scan begins. In one embodiment, the amount of time that the voltage decreases is strictly dependent upon the firmware between each scan and the CPU (Central Processing Unit) clock speed. It is appreciated that the next scan may then start with the first phase on the same sensor circuit or another sensor circuit (e.g., an adjacent or active sensor circuit).


In another embodiment, comparator 208 may be replaced with an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Charge from the sensor capacitor 222 is transferred to external modification capacitor 216 acting as a filter capacitor for a prescribed number of cycles. After the prescribed number of cycles is complete, the voltage on external modification capacitor 216 is measured by the ADC and the output of the ADC is proportional to the size of sensor capacitor 222. The measured value of the ADC may then be used to determine the presence of an object.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary voltage graph of the exemplary sensor circuit of FIG. 2 in operation, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Graph 300 includes vertical axis 320 corresponding to the voltage of external modification capacitor 216 and horizontal axis 322 corresponding to the time (or counts) which may be measured by timer 210. Graph 300 further includes voltage markers 316 corresponding to reference voltage 226 and voltage marker 318 corresponding to the start voltage.


As mentioned above, circuit 200 may operate in three phases. Graph 300 illustrates phase 1 with region 302 during which the voltage on external modification capacitor 216 is settled or brought to a start voltage.


Graph 300 illustrates phase 2 with region 304 during which external modification capacitor 216 is charged via current source 204 to reference voltage 226. The amount of time needed to reach reference voltage 226 is used by data processing module 212 to determine whether an object (e.g., finger) is present. It is appreciated that the voltage of external modification capacitor 216 may exceed reference voltage 226 before comparator 208 trips timer 210. To increase the sensitivity of this detection mechanism, the duration of 304 can be increased which will increase the resolution of the reading.


Graph 300 further illustrates phase 3 with region 306 during which external modification capacitor 216 is discharged. It is appreciated that external modification capacitor 216 may be discharged while other capacitive sensors of a capacitive sensor array are scanned.



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary sensor circuit with an equivalent resistance, in accordance with phase 1 of the circuit of FIG. 2. Sensor circuit 400 includes Vdd signal 202, current source 204, comparator 208, timer 210, data processing 212, oscillator 214, reference voltage 226, external modification capacitor 216, ground signal 224, sensor capacitor 222, and equivalent resistance 430.


In the first phase, a current value for current source 204 may be determined which results in a start voltage across equivalent resistance 430 that is below reference voltage 226.


The equivalent resistance 430 may be governed the voltage current function expressed by:







R
Equivalent

=

1


f
s

·

C
x








Where fs is the switching frequency of phases 1 and 2 as described herein, and Cx is the capacitance of sensor capacitor 22.


As shown, equivalent resistance 430 is inversely proportional to the capacitance of sensor capacitor 222. The presence of an object (e.g., finger) on a sensor therefore increases the capacitance of the sensor, which decreases equivalent resistance 430 formed by the switching phases 1 and 2. A decreased equivalent resistance results in a lower starting voltage by V=IR. In one embodiment, the start voltage may be governed the voltage current function expressed by:







V
Start

=


1


f
s

·

C
x



·
iDAC






Where fs is the switching frequency of phases 1 and 2 as described herein, and Cx is the capacitance of sensor capacitor 222 and iDAC is current of current source 204.


A lower starting voltage corresponds to an increased time for current source 204 to charge up external modification capacitor 216, thereby resulting in a larger time that timer 210 will operate. Data processing module 212 may thus process the increased value from timer 210 to indicate the presence of an object relative to the equivalent resistance 430.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary sensor circuit, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. Sensor circuit 500 includes Vdd 502, pseudo random generator 504, oscillator 506, frequency modifier 508, pulse-width modulator 510, counter 512, data processing module 514, and gate 516, latch 518, comparator 520, reference voltage 522, discharge resistor 526, ground signal 524, external modification capacitor 528, sensor capacitor 530, switch 532, switch 534, and switch 536.


Switches 532 and 534 are controlled by pseudo random generator 504, which modulates the voltage across external modification capacitor 528 about reference voltage 522 in charge up and charge down steps. Pseudo random generator 504 reduces the electromagnetic inference susceptibility and radiated emissions of capacitive sensing circuits. In one embodiment, external modification capacitor 528 is larger than sensor capacitor 530.


In one embodiment, switch 534 is used to charge sensor capacitor 530. The capacitance of sensor capacitor 530 varies with the presence of an object (e.g., a finger). After the charging of sensor capacitor 530, switch 534 is decoupled and switch 532 is coupled thereby allowing the charge of sensor capacitor 530 to flow to external modification capacitor 528.


As the charge in external modification capacitor 528 increases, so does the voltage across external modification capacitor 528. The voltage across external modification capacitor 528 may be an input to comparator 520. When the input to comparator 520 reaches the threshold voltage or reference voltage 522, discharge resistor 526 is connected and charge is bled off of external modification capacitor 528 at a rate determined by the starting voltage across the external modification capacitor 528 and the value of discharge resistor 526. As the voltage across external modification capacitor 528 decreases and the voltage passes reference voltage 522, discharge resistor 526 is disconnected from ground 524 via switch 536.


The charge/discharge cycle of the external modification capacitor 528 is manifested as a bit stream on the output of comparator 520. The bit-stream of comparator 520 is ‘ANDed’ with pulse-width modulator 510 via and gate 516 to enable timer 512. Pulse width modulator 510 sets the time-frame or measurement window in which the bit-stream enables and disables timer 512. The capacitance measurement and therefore the presence of an object is a matter of comparing the bit-stream of the comparator to the known, baseline value.


The value of reference voltage 522 affects the baseline level of counts or time measured by timer 512 from a sensor when no finger is on the sensor. This voltage on an external modification capacitor 528 may reach the reference voltage before comparator 520 trips, so the value of reference voltage 522 affects the amount of time that it takes external modification capacitor 528 to charge to reference voltage 522, decreasing the density of the bit-stream during a scan.


The output of timer 512 is used for processing the level of capacitance change and determining the sensor activation state. The duration of these steps is compared relative to each other by looking at the comparator bit-stream density. If the density of the bit-stream is relatively high, the sensor is read as “on”. The bit-stream output of comparator 520 is synchronized with system clock via latch 518.



FIG. 6 shows an equivalent resistance of the circuit of FIG. 5, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Sensor circuit 600 includes Vdd 502, oscillator 506, frequency modifier 508, pulse-width modulator 510, counter 512, data processing module 514, and gate 516, latch 518, comparator 520, reference voltage 522, discharge resistor 526, ground signal 5247 external modification capacitor 528, switch 536, and equivalent resistance 640.


Sensor capacitor 530 is replaced with equivalent resistance 540. Equivalent resistance 640 is inversely proportional to the capacitance of sensor capacitor 530. As such, the presence of an object (e.g., a finger) will result in an increase in capacitance and a corresponding reduction in the resistance of equivalent resistance 640. The reduction of equivalent resistance 640 thereby allows more current to charge external modification capacitor 528 and thereby allowing the voltage across external modification capacitor 528 to reach reference voltage 522 relatively faster.


Example System



FIG. 7 illustrates example components used by various embodiments of the present invention. Although specific components are disclosed in system 700 it should be appreciated that such components are examples. That is, embodiments of the present invention are well suited to having various other components or variations of the components recited in system 700. It is appreciated that the components in system 700 may operate with other components than those presented, and that not all of the components of system 700 may be required to achieve the goals of system 700.



FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a system for processing position information, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. System 700 may be coupled to an array of capacitive sensors comprising a plurality of sensor circuits as described herein.


Position signal receiver 702 receives position signals from an array of capacitive sensors. As described herein, the position signals may be received from one or more sensor circuits of an array of capacitive sensors. The position signals may further originate from multiple sensors comprising a centroid.


Position information module 704 accesses information corresponding with the position signal received by position signal receiver 702. The information may correspond with the position signal and include location information of a capacitive sensor within the array of capacitive sensors. For example, information regarding the relative location of a capacitive sensor relative to a connection (e.g., connections 104) of an array of capacitive sensors may be accessed. It is appreciated that values may be accessed as new position information is received from active sensors (e.g., as an object moves around).


The information may further include a scalar value for adjusting a position signal. The scalar value may be dependent on the sensor's distance from the detection logic and therefore based on the sensor's location within the array. In one embodiment, the value may be based on the percentage of reduction of the signal impacted by the impedance of the array as the signal is transmitted to a connection of a capacitive sensor array. For example, the scalar value may be used to increase a signal level by 50% of a capacitive sensor in the top left of a capacitive sensor in the array where the connections are in the bottom right. The scalar value may be based on the capacitive sensor's location resulting in a 50% reduction in the signal received at the connections of the array. It is appreciated that a scalar value corresponding to sensors adjacent to the connections of an array of capacitive sensors may not need to be applied.


In one embodiment, the scalar values may be stored in a matrix with each sensor circuit having a corresponding scalar value. For example, scalar values for adjusting position signals from sensor circuits remote from the connection of the array of capacitive sensors may be greater than the scalar values for sensor circuits near or adjacent to the connections of the array of capacitive sensors.


Scalar values corresponding to each sensor circuit may further facilitate more accurate readings from the array of capacitive sensors. For example, due to the impact of impedance on an array of capacitive sensors, centroid readings may be pulled down and to the right because the reading from sensors up and to the left are increasingly impacted by the series impedance of the array of capacitive sensors thereby having decreased sensitivity. The adjusting of centroid with the scalar values allows the centroid to be adjusted to compensate for the impact of the capacitance and thereby the centroid can be more accurately reported.


In another embodiment, all the sensor values may be adjusted by the same scalar value. For example, a scalar value may be multiplied or applied to each signal of each capacitive sensor in an array of capacitive sensors.


Sensor sensitivity control module 706 adjusts the sensitivity of one or more capacitive sensors. The sensor sensitivity control module 706 may adjust the sensitivity of one or more active capacitive sensors or a plurality of the capacitive sensors (e.g., including active and inactive sensors) in an array of capacitive sensors.


Sensor sensitivity control module 706 adjusts the sensitivity of one or more capacitive sensors by adjusting a scan time of the one or more capacitive sensors. The adjustment of the scan time of the capacitive sensors facilitates greater resolution and signal levels in readings from the capacitive sensors. The sensitivity may be adjusted according to the proximity of the sensors to the connections of the array of capacitive sensors. In one embodiment, the adjustment of the scan time increases the resolution and signals levels by increasing the detection period (e.g., phase 2 of circuit 200).


In one embodiment, a current source (e.g., current source 204) or capacitor (e.g., external modification capacitor 216) of a sensor circuit (e.g., circuit 200) may be adjusted to increase scan time. The adjustment of the current or capacitor value may result in increased counts or time measured by timer 210. For example, the current of a current source (e.g., current source 204) may be reduced which thereby increases the time before the reference voltage is reached and thereby increases the scan time.


In another embodiment, a pulse width modulator (e.g. pulse width modulator 510) may be adjusted to increase period of an output of a bit-stream of a circuit (e.g., circuit 500). The increased period of the output of the bit-stream enables higher raw counts or times to be measured thereby increasing the resolution of the sensor.


Sensor sensitivity control module 706 may further adjust the sensitivity of one or more capacitive sensors based on information corresponding to a location within the array of capacitive sensors including, but not limited to, scalar values accessed via position information module 704.


Position signal reporting module 708 reports the position signal. Position signal reporting module 708 may report a position signal after that has been adjusted by sensor sensitivity control module 706. For example, a first position signal may be received and a second signal may be reported after the sensitivity of the corresponding sensor has been adjusted by sensor sensitivity control module 706.


Example Operations


With reference to FIGS. 8-10, exemplary flowcharts 800-1000 each illustrate example blocks used by various embodiments of the present invention. Although specific blocks are disclosed in flowcharts 800-1000, such blocks are examples. That is, embodiments are well suited to performing various other blocks or variations of the blocks recited in flowcharts 800-1000. It is appreciated that the blocks in flowcharts 800-1000 may be performed in an order different than presented, and that not all of the blocks in flowcharts 800-1000 may be performed.



FIG. 8 shows a flowchart 800 of an exemplary process for reporting position information, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The blocks of flowchart 800 may be performed by a data processing portion (e.g., data processing module 212 or data processing module 514) of a sensor circuit (e.g., sensor circuits 200 and 400-600).


At block 802, first position information regarding an interaction is received from a number of capacitive sensors. As described herein, the position information may include a centroid computation and may be received from one or more capacitive sensors in an array of capacitive sensors. Sensors reporting a signal that exceeds a threshold are active and contribute to the centroid computation.


At block 804, an adjustment value corresponding to the position information is accessed. As described herein, the adjustment value corresponding to the position information may be based on a location of the active capacitive sensor within an array of capacitive sensors relative to the connections of the array. For example, a larger adjustment value may correspond to sensors whose signal is impacted by the series impedance of the array of capacitive sensors as the signal travels to the connections of the array of capacitive sensors. In one embodiment, each capacitive sensor in the array may have a respective adjustment value assigned to it based on its relative distance to the detector logic. At step 804, the adjustment values are obtained for the active sensors participating in the centroid computation.


At block 806, the first position information is adjusted based on the adjustment values corresponding to the position information to calculate an adjusted position information. The adjusting may include multiplying the signals corresponding to the first position information with the adjustment values which may be scalar values. As described herein, the values may be applied to active sensors or one or more sensors of the array of capacitive sensors. It is appreciated that the adjustment of the position information may improve the signal level reported by sensor and thereby compensate for the impact of impedance on the array of capacitive sensors. In accordance with the embodiment described above, the sensor readings for the active sensors are multiplied by their respective adjustment values. This new data is then used to determine an adjusted position.


At block 808, a position of the interaction is computed using the adjusted signals. In one embodiment, the centroid is again calculated based on the adjusted position information.


At block 810, the position of the interaction as computed in 808 is reported. As described herein, the position of the interaction (e.g., centroid) may be reported to the device (e.g., computing device and the like) coupled to the array of capacitive sensors.



FIG. 9 shows a flowchart 900 of an exemplary process for processing a position signal, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The blocks of flowchart 900 may be performed by a data processing portion (e.g., data processing module 212 or data processing module 514) of a sensor circuit (e.g., sensor circuits 200 and 400-600). It is appreciated that blocks or select blocks of flowchart 900 may be repeated as the position signal (e.g., centroid) moves around an array of capacitive sensors.


At block 902, the array of capacitive sensors is in a low sensitivity mode with all sensors scanned. In one embodiment, the array of capacitive sensors may operate in a low sensitivity mode while no interactions with the array are detected.


At block 904, whether an interaction with the array of capacitive sensors has occurred is detected. If there is no interaction detected, the capacitive sensor array remains in low sensitivity mode at block 902. If an interaction is detected, the capacitive sensor array may proceed to block 906.


At block 906, a first position signal is received from a first plurality of capacitive sensors. As described herein, the first position signal may be computed from a centroid and may be received from a plurality of capacitive sensors which are part of an array of capacitive sensors.


At block 908, a proximity of the plurality of capacitive sensors to a connection of an array of capacitive sensors is determined on an individual level. As described herein, the relative locations of one or more capacitive sensors to the connections of an array of capacitive sensors may be determined.


At block 910, the sensitivity of all capacitive sensors in the array of capacitive sensors is adjusted. The sensitivity of one or more capacitive sensors may be adjusted to increase the resolution and signal level, thereby compensating for the impact of the impedance of an array of capacitive sensors. Adjusting the sensitivity of all of the sensors allows enhanced tracking of an object as movement is detected.


The sensitivity of the capacitive sensors may be adjusted by adjusting the scan time of the capacitive sensors based individually on their location within the array. As described herein, the scan time of an individual sensor circuit may be adjusted by adjusting the current (e.g., lowering the current) for charging a capacitor of a current source (e.g., current source 204), adjusting a pulse width modulation (e.g., of pulse width modulator 410), a voltage threshold (e.g., reference voltage 226 or 422), or adjusting a capacitance of an integration capacitor (e.g., external modification capacitor 428). In one embodiment, the adjustment of the scan time increases the resolution and signals levels by increasing the detection period (e.g., phase 2 of circuit 200).


In one embodiment, the scan time may be adjusted according to the position of one or more capacitive sensors. For example, the scan time of sensors in the upper left could be increased more than the scan time in the middle of a capacitive sensor array where the connections of the array are in the lower right. In one embodiment, each sensor may have a respective adjustment factor that is based on its distance from the detecting logic.


At block 912, a second position signal is received from a second plurality of capacitive sensors. The second position signal may be received after the sensitivity of the sensors has been adjusted as described herein. It is appreciated that the second plurality of sensors may be different from the first plurality of sensors where the object has moved before the sensitivity of the sensors has been adjusted. The first plurality of sensors and the second plurality of sensors may be same when the object has not moved. At block 914, the second position signal is reported.



FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of an exemplary process for processing a position signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The blocks of flowchart 1000 may be performed by a data processing portion (e.g., data processing module 212 or data processing module 514) of a sensor circuit (e.g., sensor circuits 200 and 400-600). It is appreciated that blocks or select blocks of flowchart 1000 may be repeated as the position signal (e.g., centroid) moves around an array of capacitive sensors.


At block 1002, the array of capacitive sensors is in a low sensitivity mode with all sensors scanned. In one embodiment, the array of capacitive sensors may operate in a low sensitivity mode while no interactions with the array are detected.


At block 1004, whether an interaction with the array of capacitive sensors has occurred is detected. If there is no interaction detected, the capacitive sensor array remains in low sensitivity mode at block 1002. If an interaction is detected, the capacitive sensor array may proceed to block 1006.


At block 1006, a first position signal is received from a plurality of active capacitive sensors. As described herein, the first position signal may be coupled from a centroid and may be received from a plurality of capacitive sensors which are part of an array of capacitive sensors.


At block 1008, a proximity of the plurality of active capacitive sensors to a connection of an array of capacitive sensors is determined. As described herein, the relative locations of one or more capacitive sensors to the connections of an array of capacitive sensors may be determined.


At block 1010, the sensitivity of the active capacitive sensors in the array of capacitive sensors is adjusted. The sensitivity of one or more capacitive sensors may be adjusted to increase the resolution and signal level, thereby compensating for the impact of the impedance of an array of capacitive sensors. Adjusting the sensitivity of the active capacitive sensors saves power over increasing the sensitivity of all the capacitive sensors.


The sensitivity of the capacitive sensors may be adjusted by adjusting the scan time of the capacitive sensors. As described herein, the scan time of an individual sensor circuit may be adjusted by adjusting the current (e.g., lowering the current) for charging a capacitor of a current source (e.g., current source 204), adjusting a pulse width modulation (e.g., of pulse width modulator 410), a voltage threshold (e.g., reference voltage 226 or 422), or adjusting a capacitance of an integration capacitor (e.g., external modification capacitor 428). In one embodiment, the adjustment of the scan time increases the resolution and signals levels by increasing the detection period (e.g., phase 2 of circuit 200). It is appreciated that adjusting the scan time of the active capacitive sensors saves scan time over increasing the scan time of the entire array of capacitive sensors.


In one embodiment, the scan time may be adjusted according to the position of one or more active capacitive sensors. For example, the scan time of sensors in the upper left could be increased more than the scan time in the middle of a capacitive sensor array where the connections of the array are in the lower right. In one embodiment, each sensor may have a respective adjustment factor that is based on its distance from the detecting logic.


At block 1012, a second position signal is received from the plurality of active capacitive sensors with heightened sensitivity. The second position signal may be received after the sensitivity of the sensors has been adjusted as described herein. At block 1014, the second position signal is reported.


Thus, embodiments of the present invention compensate for the impedance of an array of capacitive sensors. Thus, a substantial improvement in accuracy and performance of arrays of capacitive sensors is achieved.


Embodiments of the present invention are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for reporting position information, the method comprising: adjusting position information received from a plurality of capacitive sensors in an array of capacitive sensors based on predetermined adjustment values to generate adjusted position information, wherein each predetermined adjustment value is associated with at least one of the plurality of capacitive sensors, and wherein each predetermined adjustment value is derived from a distance between the at least one of the plurality of capacitive sensors and a connection of the array of capacitive sensors; andgenerating a signal representative of the adjusted position information.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each predetermined adjustment value is derived from a position of the at least one of the plurality of capacitive sensors within the array of capacitive sensors.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein each predetermined adjustment value is a scalar value, and the predetermined adjustment values are stored in a matrix corresponding to the array of capacitive sensors.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the adjusting of the position information comprises multiplying the position information received from the plurality of capacitive sensors by the respective predetermined adjustment values.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing a centroid computation based on the adjust position information.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the array of capacitive sensors comprises a high impedance substrate.
  • 7. A method for reporting position information comprising: adjusting the sensitivity of at least one capacitive sensor in a capacitive sensor array based on a distance between the at least one capacitive sensor and a connection of the capacitive sensor array;receiving position information from the at least one capacitive sensor; andgenerating a signal representative of the position information.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising generating the position information with the at least one capacitive sensor, wherein the generating of the position information comprises charging the at least one capacitive sensor based on the operation of a switch.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the operation of the switch is controlled by a pseudo random generator.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the adjusting of the sensitivity of the at least one capacitive sensor comprises adjusting a scan time of the at least one capacitive sensor.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the adjusting of the scan time of the at least one capacitive sensor comprises adjusting a current source coupled to the at least one capacitive sensor.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the adjusting of the scan time of the at least one capacitive sensor comprises adjusting the pulse width modulation of a pulse width modulator.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one capacitive sensor is coupled to a capacitor, and the adjusting of the scan time of the at least one capacitive sensor comprises adjusting a reference voltage to which a voltage across the capacitor is compared.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one capacitive sensor is coupled to a capacitor, and the adjusting of the scan time of the at least one capacitor comprises adjusting the capacitance of the capacitor.
  • 15. A method for reporting position information, the method comprising: storing a plurality of predetermined adjustment values, wherein each predetermined adjustment value is associated with at least one of a plurality of capacitive sensors in an array of capacitive sensors, and wherein each predetermined adjustment value is derived from a distance between at least one of the plurality of capacitive sensors and a connection of the array of capacitive sensors; andgenerating a signal based on the predetermined adjustment values and received position information.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein generating the signal further comprises adjusting position information received from the plurality of capacitive sensors based on the stored predetermined adjustment values to generate adjusted position information.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein each predetermined adjustment value is a scalar value, and the predetermined adjustment values are stored in a matrix corresponding to the array of capacitive sensors.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising adjusting the position information by multiplying the received position information by the respective predetermined adjustment values.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, further comprising performing a centroid computation based on the adjusted position information.
  • 20. The method of claim 15, wherein the array of capacitive sensors comprises a high impedance substrate.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/167,552, filed Jul. 3, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/947,903, filed on Jul. 3, 2007, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (208)
Number Name Date Kind
4266144 Bristol May 1981 A
4283713 Philipp Aug 1981 A
4438404 Philipp Mar 1984 A
4475151 Philipp Oct 1984 A
4497575 Philipp Feb 1985 A
4736097 Philipp Apr 1988 A
4736191 Matzke et al. Apr 1988 A
4773024 Faggin et al. Sep 1988 A
4802103 Faggin et al. Jan 1989 A
4831325 Watson, Jr. May 1989 A
4876534 Mead et al. Oct 1989 A
4879461 Philipp Nov 1989 A
4935702 Mead et al. Jun 1990 A
4953928 Anderson et al. Sep 1990 A
4962342 Mead et al. Oct 1990 A
5049758 Mead et al. Sep 1991 A
5055827 Philipp Oct 1991 A
5059920 Anderson et al. Oct 1991 A
5068622 Mead et al. Nov 1991 A
5073759 Mead et al. Dec 1991 A
5083044 Mead et al. Jan 1992 A
5095284 Mead Mar 1992 A
5097305 Mead et al. Mar 1992 A
5107149 Platt et al. Apr 1992 A
5109261 Mead et al. Apr 1992 A
5119038 Anderson et al. Jun 1992 A
5120996 Mead et al. Jun 1992 A
5122800 Philipp Jun 1992 A
5126685 Platt et al. Jun 1992 A
5146106 Anderson et al. Sep 1992 A
5160899 Anderson et al. Nov 1992 A
5166562 Allen et al. Nov 1992 A
5204549 Platt et al. Apr 1993 A
5243554 Allen et al. Sep 1993 A
5248873 Allen et al. Sep 1993 A
5260592 Mead et al. Nov 1993 A
5270963 Allen et al. Dec 1993 A
5276407 Mead et al. Jan 1994 A
5289023 Mead Feb 1994 A
5303329 Mead et al. Apr 1994 A
5305017 Gerpheide Apr 1994 A
5324958 Mead et al. Jun 1994 A
5331215 Allen et al. Jul 1994 A
5336936 Allen et al. Aug 1994 A
5339213 O'Callaghan Aug 1994 A
5349303 Gerpheide Sep 1994 A
5374787 Miller et al. Dec 1994 A
5381515 Platt et al. Jan 1995 A
5384467 Plimon et al. Jan 1995 A
5408194 Steinbach et al. Apr 1995 A
5488204 Mead et al. Jan 1996 A
5495077 Miller et al. Feb 1996 A
5541878 Lemoncheck et al. Jul 1996 A
5543588 Bisset et al. Aug 1996 A
5543590 Gillespie et al. Aug 1996 A
5543591 Gillespie et al. Aug 1996 A
5555907 Philipp Sep 1996 A
5565658 Gerpheide et al. Oct 1996 A
5566702 Philipp Oct 1996 A
5629891 Lemoncheck et al. May 1997 A
5646377 Oda Jul 1997 A
5648642 Miller et al. Jul 1997 A
5670915 Cooper et al. Sep 1997 A
5682032 Philipp Oct 1997 A
5730165 Philipp Mar 1998 A
5757368 Gerpheide et al. May 1998 A
5763909 Mead et al. Jun 1998 A
5767457 Gerpheide et al. Jun 1998 A
5796183 Hourmand et al. Aug 1998 A
5812698 Platt et al. Sep 1998 A
5841078 Miller et al. Nov 1998 A
5844265 Mead et al. Dec 1998 A
5854625 Frisch et al. Dec 1998 A
5861583 Schediwy et al. Jan 1999 A
5861875 Gerpheide Jan 1999 A
5864242 Allen et al. Jan 1999 A
5864392 Winklhofer et al. Jan 1999 A
5880411 Gillespie et al. Mar 1999 A
5889236 Gillespie et al. Mar 1999 A
5914465 Allen et al. Jun 1999 A
5914708 Lagrange et al. Jun 1999 A
5920310 Faggin et al. Jul 1999 A
5926566 Wang et al. Jul 1999 A
5942733 Allen et al. Aug 1999 A
5943052 Allen et al. Aug 1999 A
5969513 Clark Oct 1999 A
6023422 Allen et al. Feb 2000 A
6028271 Gillespie et al. Feb 2000 A
6028959 Wang et al. Feb 2000 A
6097432 Mead et al. Aug 2000 A
6148104 Wang et al. Nov 2000 A
6185450 Seguine et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188228 Philipp Feb 2001 B1
6188391 Seely et al. Feb 2001 B1
6222528 Gerpheide et al. Apr 2001 B1
6239389 Allen et al. May 2001 B1
6249447 Boylan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262717 Donohue et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280391 Olson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288707 Philipp Sep 2001 B1
6304014 England et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320184 Winklhofer et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323846 Westerman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326859 Goldman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6377009 Philipp Apr 2002 B1
6380929 Platt Apr 2002 B1
6380931 Gillespie et al. Apr 2002 B1
6414671 Gillespie et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430305 Decker Aug 2002 B1
6441073 Tanaka et al. Aug 2002 B1
6448911 Somayajula Sep 2002 B1
6452514 Philipp Sep 2002 B1
6457355 Philipp Oct 2002 B1
6466036 Philipp Oct 2002 B1
6473069 Gerpheide Oct 2002 B1
6489899 Ely et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498720 Glad Dec 2002 B2
6499359 Washeleski et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506983 Babb et al. Jan 2003 B1
6522128 Ely et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523416 Takagi et al. Feb 2003 B2
6534970 Ely et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535200 Philipp Mar 2003 B2
6570557 Westerman et al. May 2003 B1
6583632 Von Basse et al. Jun 2003 B2
6587093 Shaw et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610936 Gillespie et al. Aug 2003 B2
6624640 Lund et al. Sep 2003 B2
6639586 Gerpheide Oct 2003 B2
6642857 Schediwy et al. Nov 2003 B1
6649924 Philipp et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667740 Ely et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673308 Hino et al. Jan 2004 B2
6677932 Westerman Jan 2004 B1
6680731 Gerpheide et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683462 Shimizu Jan 2004 B2
6705511 Dames et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714817 Daynes et al. Mar 2004 B2
6730863 Gerpheide et al. May 2004 B1
6750852 Gillespie et al. Jun 2004 B2
6774644 Eberlein Aug 2004 B2
6781577 Shigetaka Aug 2004 B2
6788221 Ely et al. Sep 2004 B1
6788521 Nishi Sep 2004 B2
6798218 Kasperkovitz Sep 2004 B2
6809275 Cheng et al. Oct 2004 B1
6856433 Hatano et al. Feb 2005 B2
6873203 Latham, II et al. Mar 2005 B1
6888538 Ely et al. May 2005 B2
6893724 Lin et al. May 2005 B2
6903402 Miyazawa Jun 2005 B2
6904570 Foote et al. Jun 2005 B2
6933931 Lubarsky et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949811 Miyazawa Sep 2005 B2
6969978 Dening Nov 2005 B2
6970160 Mulligan et al. Nov 2005 B2
6975123 Malang et al. Dec 2005 B1
7006078 Kim Feb 2006 B2
7030782 Ely et al. Apr 2006 B2
7030860 Hsu et al. Apr 2006 B1
7046230 Zadesky et al. May 2006 B2
7068039 Parker Jun 2006 B2
7075316 Umeda et al. Jul 2006 B2
7109978 Gillespie et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119550 Kitano et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133140 Lukacs et al. Nov 2006 B2
7133793 Ely et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141968 Hibbs et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141987 Hibbs et al. Nov 2006 B2
7148704 Philipp Dec 2006 B2
7151528 Taylor et al. Dec 2006 B2
7212189 Shaw et al May 2007 B2
7239302 Kim Jul 2007 B2
7288977 Stanley Oct 2007 B2
7298124 Kan et al. Nov 2007 B2
7307485 Snyder et al. Dec 2007 B1
7375535 Kutz et al. May 2008 B1
7400318 Gerpheide et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423635 Taylor et al. Sep 2008 B2
7429976 Harley et al. Sep 2008 B2
7466307 Trent, Jr. et al. Dec 2008 B2
7492358 Chi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7663607 Hotelling et al. Feb 2010 B2
7701440 Harley Apr 2010 B2
7728377 Elsass et al. Jun 2010 B2
7868875 Park et al. Jan 2011 B2
7920134 Krah Apr 2011 B2
7965281 Mackey Jun 2011 B2
8086417 Seguine Dec 2011 B2
8482536 Young Jul 2013 B1
20020063688 Shaw et al. May 2002 A1
20020191029 Gillespie et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030062889 Ely et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030080755 Kobayashi May 2003 A1
20030091220 Sato et al. May 2003 A1
20050024341 Gillespie et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050031175 Hara et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050243894 Chen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060032680 Elias et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060181627 Farrier Aug 2006 A1
20060273804 Delorme et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279548 Geaghan Dec 2006 A1
20060290677 Lyon et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070024970 Lub et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070052690 Roberts Mar 2007 A1
20070229469 Seguine Oct 2007 A1
20070229470 Snyder et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080100586 Smart May 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
315495 Oct 2009 TW
Non-Patent Literature Citations (40)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297: “Normalizing Capacitive Sensor Array Signals” Ryan D. Seguine et al., filed Jun. 8, 2011; 48 pages.
Chapweske, Adam; “The PS/2 Mouse Interface,” PS/2 Mouse Interfacing, 2001, retrieved on May 18, 2006; 10 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/69107 dated Oct. 2, 2008; 2 pages.
Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297 dated Dec. 1, 2011; 6 pages.
Taiwanese Office Action for Application No. 097125030 dated Feb. 6, 2014; 2 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297 dated May 3, 2012; 22 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297 dated Feb. 23, 2012; 13 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297 dated Jul. 9, 2012; 8 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,297 dated Sep. 18, 2012; 8 pages.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/69107 dated Oct. 2, 2008; 5 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “CY8C21×34 Data Sheet,” CSR User Module, CSR V.1.0; Oct. 6, 2005; 36 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “Cypress Introduces PSoC(TM)-Based Capacitive Touch Sensor Solution,” Cypress Press Release; May 31, 2005; <http://www.cypress.com/portal/server>; retrieved on Feb. 5, 2007; 4 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “FAN Controller CG6457AM and CG6462AM,” PSoC Mixed Signal Array Preliminary Data Sheet; May 24, 2005; 25 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “PSoC CY8C20×34 Technical Reference Manual (TRM),” PSoC CY8C20×34 TRM, Version 1.0, 2006; 218 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “PSoC Mixed-Signal Controllers,” Production Description; <http://www.cypress.com/portal/server>; retrieved on Sep. 27, 2005; 2 pages.
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “Release Notes srn017,” Jan. 24, 2007; 3 pages.
Dennis Seguine, “Capacitive Switch Scan,” AN2233a, Application Note, CY8C21×34, Apr. 7, 2005; 6 pages.
Lee, Mark; “EMC Design Considerations for PSoC CapSense Applications,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2318; Sep. 16, 2005; 6 pages.
Sedra, Adel S. et al., “Microelectronic Circuits,” 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, pp. xiii-xx and 861-883, 1991; 20 pages.
Seguine, Ryan; “Layout Guidelines for PSoC CapSense,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2292; Jul. 22, 2005; 13 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated Nov. 30, 2007; 3 pages.
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,506 dated Apr. 12, 2010; 3 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated Sep. 7, 2007; 9 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,708 dated Jul. 5, 2007; 8 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,506 dated Feb. 3, 2010; 14 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,506 dated Dec. 21, 2010; 14 pages.
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,819 dated Feb. 2, 2010; 15 pages.
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,552 dated May 18, 2010; 12 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated Jan. 16, 2007; 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated May 11, 2006; 5 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated May 25, 2006; 5 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated Aug. 28, 2006; 7 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,708 dated Mar. 19, 2007; 16 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,506 dated Aug. 11, 2009; 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,819 dated Aug. 11, 2009; 12 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,719 dated Jan. 16, 2008; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,708 dated Aug. 9, 2007; 4 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,552 dated Aug. 19, 2011; 9 pages.
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,552 dated Nov. 12, 2010; 8 pages.
Van Ess, David; “Simulating a 555 Timer with PSoC,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2286, May 19, 2005; 10 pages.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60947903 Jul 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12167552 Jul 2008 US
Child 13156297 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13156297 Jun 2011 US
Child 14171746 US