The present invention relates to the area of sexual dysfunction in men and women.
The present invention relates in particular to a novel combination preparation for treating sexual dysfunction in men and women, in particular erectile dysfunction. The present invention thus also provides a novel combination therapy for the treatment of sexual dysfunction in men and women.
The present invention furthermore relates to the use of antilipernics for enhancing the activity of phosphodiesterase inhibitors (hereinbelow synonymously also referred to as “phosphodiesterase inhibitors” or “PDE inhibitors”) for treatment of sexual dysfunction.
From the prior art it is known that phosphodiesterase inhibitors—in particular those of subtype V, which are synonymously also referred to as “cGMP PDE inhibitors”—are suitable for treating sexual dysfunction, in particular for treating erectile dysfunction (see, for example, Molecular Pharmacology, 1999, 56, pages 124-130; Am. J. Physiol., Vol. 264, February 1993, pages H419-H422; The Journal of Urology, Vol. 147, pages 1650-1655 (June 1992); The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 326(2), pages 90-94 (9 Jan. 1992); International Journal of Impotence Research, 4, Suppl. 2, page 11 (1992); Drugs, News and Perspectives, 6(3), pages 150-156 (April 1993); Physiological Reviews 75, pages 191-236 (1995); Int. J. of Impotence 9, pages 17-26 (1997) and TIPS Reviews, Vol. 11, pages 150-155 (April 1990)).
Concerning the nomenclature of PDE inhibitors, reference is made to Beavo and Reifsnyder in Trends in Pharmacol. Sci. 1990. 11, pages 150-155 and to the article TIPS Reviews, Vol. 11, pages 150-155 (April 1990).
The reason for the effectiveness of PDE inhibitors, in particular cGMP PDE inhibitors (PDE V inhibitors), in the treatment of sexual, preferably erectile, dysfunction is that the neurotransmitter nitrogen monoxide NO, which is generated by the body following sexual stimulation, activates guanylate cyclase, which in turn converts GTP into cGMP, which for its part may then cause a relaxation of the corpus cavernosum, without the cGMP, which is responsible for the relaxation of the corpus cavernosum, being hydrolyzed by the enzyme phosphodiesterase V (PDE V) to give 5′GMP, since the activity of the enzyme PDE V is inhibited by the corresponding inhibitor. This mechanism is illustrated in the attached
However, it has now been found that, in some patients, therapy of erectile dysfunction using PDE inhibitors, in particular cGMP PDE inhibitors, is unsuccessful or of only limited success. This group of patients comprises in particular patients having a disturbed endothelium function and/or metabolic disorders, such as, for example, hyperlipidemia (for example hypercholesterolemia), arteriosclerosis, diabetes (in particular of the diabetes mellitus type), and also heavy smokers and elderly patients. In these patients, the therapy of erectile dysfunction using customary doses results only in a considerably reduced effect, compared to other groups of patients which undergo therapy for erectile dysfunction but do not suffer from the abovementioned metabolic disorders.
However, it is exactly the abovementioned patient group having disturbed endothelium function and/or the abovementioned metabolic disorders which suffers more frequently than average from sexual dysfunction, in particular erectile dysfunction, which renders the customary treatment of this dysfunction with PDE inhibitors more difficult. To achieve a therapeutic effect, considerably higher doses of PDE inhibitors have to be administered to these problem patients, compared to other patient groups suffering from erectile dysfunction, but not from the metabolic disorders mentioned above. This, however, has—in addition to higher costs—the essential disadvantage that the side effects associated with the PDE inhibitor therapy are also increased by the factor of the higher dosage. These side effects include, for example, disturbed vision, in particular disturbed color vision and color perception, headaches and muscle aches. Side effects on the cardiovascular system, for example a lowering of the blood pressure, are also possible.
Surprisingly, the applicant has now found that the activity of PDE inhibitors, in particular PDE V inhibitors, in the therapy of sexual, preferably erectile, dysfunction—in particular in the groups of problem patients mentioned above—can be increased by combined administration of the PDE inhibitors with an antilipemic. In this manner, it is possible to avoid the disadvantages described above which are encountered in the customary treatment of erectile dysfunction when using PDE inhibitors alone, in particular in the problem patients mentioned above.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a combination preparation comprising
The combination preparation according to the invention is particularly suitable for therapy of sexual dysfunction, i.e. therapy of erectile dysfunction in men or sexual dysfunction in women.
At the same time, the combination preparation according to the invention allows a cotherapy of disturbed endothelium function (for example in elderly patients or heavy smokers) and/or a metabolic disorder, such as, for example, hyperlipidemia (for example hypercholesterolemia), arteriosclerosis or diabetes (in particular of the diabetes mellitus type).
The term “combination preparation”, as used for the purpose of the present invention, means that the two active compound components A and B can be used either simultaneously or else successively (i.e. separately).
Thus, according to the invention, the term “combination preparation” includes the ingredients A and B either in a functional unit, i.e. as a true combination (for example as a mixture, mix or blend), or else (spatially) separated, i.e. as a “kit-of-parts”.
Accordingly, the present invention also provides the use of antilipemics for enhancing the activity of PDE inhibitors (in particular PDE V inhibitors) in the therapy of sexual dysfunction, in particular erectile dysfunction.
The present invention furthermore provides a combination therapy for sexual dysfunction, in particular for erectile dysfunction, using a combination preparation which comprises at least one PDE inhibitor (in particular a PDE V inhibitor) and at least one antilipemic.
At the same time, the combination therapy according to the invention also allows a cotherapy of a disturbed endothelium function (for example in elderly patients or heavy smokers) and/or a metabolic disorder, such as, for example, hyperlipidemia (for example hypercholesterolemia), arteriosclerosis or diabetes (in particular of the diabetes mellitus type).
Using the combination according to the invention of PDE inhibitors and antilipemics—i.e., in other words, by applying the combination therapy according to the invention of sexual dysfunction using a combination of PDE inhibitor and antilipemic—it is possible to reduce the therapeutically required doses of PDE inhibitors in the abovementioned problem patients to customary doses like those administered to other patients suffering from erectile dysfunction but not from disturbed endothelium function or a metabolic disorder. However, according to the invention, it is also possible to reduce, by combined administration with an antilipemic, the dose of PDE inhibitor administered for the therapy of erectile dysfunction in patients who do not suffer from a specific metabolic disorder but who do suffer (for example because of old age) from erectile dysfunction.
As mentioned above, the combination according to the invention can be administered, i.e. the combination therapy according to the invention can be applied, by simultaneous administration of active compound components A and B. Here, the active compound components A and B can, as described above, be present either in a functional unit (i.e. as a true combination, such as, for example, as a mixture, a mix or a blend) or else (spatially) separated (i.e. as a “kit” or a “kit-of-parts”).
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the active compound components A and B are administered separately, in particular successively.
This can take place, for example, by administering a daily dose of the antilipemic even a few days (for example about 1 week or else only 1-4 days) before administering the PDE inhibitor.
It is also possible to administer the PDE inhibitor in an ongoing therapy with antilipemics. Thus, according to the present invention it is possible, for example, to observe better successes in the therapy of erectile dysfunction using PDE inhibitors in men suffering from severe hypercholesterolemia in which the elevated cholesterol levels are already treated on a permanent basis using antilipemics.
However, surprisingly, similarly good therapeutic results are also observed in cases where the antilipemic is administered only a short time (for example a few days) before the administration of the PDE inhibitor. This is surprising and indicates an unforeseeable synergistic effect of the combination according to the invention, since in the patients treated in this manner, suffering, for example, from arteriosclerosis, there are not yet any changes in their symptoms, owing to the short duration of the therapy with the antilipemic.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the active compound components A and B of the combination preparation according to the invention are thus administered successively, with the antilipemic preferably being administered first, i.e. before the administration of the PDE inhibitor. This can be achieved by simply administering the antilipemic a short time before the administration of the PDE inhibitor, i.e. several times over a number of days or else only once a few hours beforehand, or else by administering the PDE inhibitor in an ongoing therapy with an antilipemic. Thus, in the latter case, the administration of the antilipemic can be continued both before and concomitantly with the administration of the PDE inhibitor.
Without wishing to adhere to a certain theory, the improved PDE-inhibitory action of the PDE inhibitor by simultaneous or successive or concomitant administration of antilipemics can probably be explained by the fact that antilipemics improve the disturbed endothelium function by generating nitrogen monoxide (NO) (Current Opinion in Lipidology, 1997, Vol. 8, pages 362-368 and Circulation 1998, 97, pages 1129-1135). As a neurotransmitter, nitrogen monoxide in turn is an important physiological factor for an erection to take place, since it increases the cGMP concentration, which finally results in a relaxation of the corpus cavernosum (International Journal of Impotence Research 1999, 11, pages 123-132 and 159-165).
According to the present invention, the antilipemic can be selected from the group consisting of:
For further details about the antilipemics mentioned above, reference is in this context made to the article by Gilbert R. Thompson & Rissitaza P. Naoumova “New prospects for lipid-lowering drugs” in Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (1998), 7(5), pages 715-727, the entire content of which is hereby expressly incorporated by way of reference.
Among the antilipemics mentioned above, preference according to the invention is given to the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors. Here, the abbreviation “HMG-CoA” denotes “3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A”.
Among the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors, in turn, preference according to the invention is given, in particular, to the substance class of the vastatins—which, for the sake of simplicity, are in most cases referred to in the literature simply as “statins”.
Among the statins, in turn, particular preference according to the invention is given to
Among these, in turn, very particular preference is given to cerivastatin and atorvastatin and their respective salts, hydrates, alkoxides, esters and tautomers.
For further details about the statins mentioned above, reference is made to the discourse in Drugs of the Future 1994, 19(6), pages 537-541 and 1995, 20(6), page 611 and 1996, 21(6), page 642, the respective content of which is included herein in its entirety by way of reference.
For the purpose of the present invention, the term “salt” refers in each case to physiologically acceptable salts of the compounds in question: these can, for example, be salts with mineral acids, carboxylic acids or sulfonic acids, in particular with hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid, toluenesulfonic acid, benzenesulfonic acid, naphthalenedisulfonic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, lactic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, fumaric acid, maleic acid or benzoic acid, or else mixed salts thereof. However, the salts can also be salts with customary bases, such as, for example, alkali metal salts (for example sodium or potassium salts), alkaline earth metal salts (for example calcium or magnesium salts) or ammonium salts, derived from ammonia or organic amines, such as, for example, diethylamine, triethylamine, ethyldiisopropylamine, procaine, dibenzylamine, N-methylmorpholine, dihydro-abietylamine, 1-ephenamine or methyl-piperidine, and also mixed salts thereof.
Examples of statin salts which can be used according to the invention are fluindostatin (the monosodium salt of fluvastatin); the monopotassium salt and the calcium salt of itavastatin; and the calcium salt of (+)-(3R,5S)-bis-(7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(N-methyl-N-methane-sulfonylamino)-pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxy-6(E)-heptenoic acid (“ZD 4522” or “S 4522” from Shionogi and AstraZeneca, respectively). Further examples of statin salts which can be used according to the invention are the monosodium and the monopotassium salts and also the calcium salts of cerivastatin, atorvastatin and pravastatin.
Further preferred HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors are described in EP-A-0 325 130 and EP-A-0-491 226, both in the name of Bayer AG, the content of which is hereby included by way of reference. EP-A-0 325 130 provides substituted pyridines, and EP-A-0-491 226 describes substituted pyridyldihydroxyheptenoic acid derivatives and their salts, and among these in particular cerivastatin, which is particularly preferred according to the invention (claim 6 of EP-A-0-491 226).
Preference according to the invention is also given to the statins mentioned in WO-A-99/11263, the disclosure of which is included by way of reference.
Preference according to the invention is likewise given to the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors mentioned in the publication Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 5, No. 2, pages 437-444 (1997), the disclosure of which is hereby included in its entirety by way of reference.
A further review of HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors can be found in Pharmazie in unserer Zeit, Vol. 28, No. 3, pages 147-1152 (1999).
Among the bile acid sequestrants mentioned above, preference according to the invention is given to cholestyramine (commercially available under the name Questran® from Bristol-Myers Squibb) and colestipol (commercially available under the name Colestid® from Pharmacia & Upjohn) (see also Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (1998), 7(5), pages 715-727).
Among the fibric acid derivatives mentioned above, preference according to the invention is given to ciprofibrate (commercially available under the name Modalim® from Sanofi Winthrop), fenofibrate (commercially available under the name Lipantil® from Fournier), gemfibrozil (commercially available under the name Lopid® from Parke-Davis), bezafibrate and chlofibrate (see also Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (1998), 7(5), pages 715-727).
Among the nicotinic acid analogs mentioned above, preference according to the invention is given to acipimox (commercially available under the name Olbetam® from Pharmacia & Upjohn) (see also Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (1998), 7(5), pages 715-727).
Among the ω3-fatty acids mentioned above, preference according to the invention is given to Maxepa (distributed by Seven Seas) (see also Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (1998), 7(5), pages 715-727).
Among the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, preference according to the invention is given in particular to cGMP PDE inhibitors. Among these, in turn, preference is given in particular to those which can be administered orally and, at the same time, also have good activity following oral administration.
Examples of cGMP PDE inhibitors which can be used and are preferred according to the invention are in particular the pyrazolopyrimidones described in EP-A-0 463 756, EP-A-0 526 004, WO-A-94/28902 and EP-B-0 702 555, the respective content of which is hereby included by way of reference. These are in particular compounds of the general formula below
in which
Among these, very particular preference according to the invention is given to 5-[3-ethoxy-5-(4-methyl-1-piperazinylsulfonyl)-phenyl]-1-methyl-3-n-propyl-6,7-di-hydro-1H-pyrazolo-[4,3-d]-pyrimidin-7-one (other name: 5-[2-ethoxy-5-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl-sulfonyl)-phenyl]-1-methyl-3-n-propyl-1,6-dihydro-7H-pyrazolo-[4,3-d]-pyrimidin-7-one, also known as “sildenafil”) and its salts, thus, for example, in particular the citrate salt, which is commercially available under the name Viagra™ (see in particular example 12 and compound 3 of claim 3 of EP-A-0 463 756 and also claim 6 of EP-B-0 702 555). cGMP PDE inhibitors which are likewise preferred according to the invention are the compounds described in WO-A-99/24433, the content of which is hereby included in its entirety by way of reference. The compounds in question are 2-phenyl-substituted imidazotriazinones of the general formula
in which
Among the compounds mentioned in WO-A-99/24433, very particular preference according to the invention is given to 2-[2-ethoxy-5-(4-ethyl-piperazine-1-sulfonyl)-phenyl]-5-methyl-7-propyl-3H-imidazo[5,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-one (Ex. 19 of WO-A-99/24433) and its salts, such as, for example, the hydrochloride (Ex. 20 of WO-A-99/24433), in particular in the form of the trihydrate (Ex. 336 of WO-A-99/24433).
Further preferred PDE V inhibitors according to the invention are (a) zaprinast (Am. J. Physiol., Vol. 264, February 1993, pages H419-H422; The Journal of Urology, Vol. 147, pages 1650-1655 (June 1992); The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 326(2), pages 90-94 (9 January 1992)); (b) propentofylline (JP-A-03/044324); and (c) pentoxifylline (Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 3, Impotence, 15 Feb. 1993, pages 65-72; J.A.G.S., 41, pages 363-366, 1993).
Further PDE V inhibitors which are preferred according to the invention are disclosed in the following publications, the contents of which are included in their entirety by way of reference:
Further PDE inhibitors which are preferred and can be used according to the invention are:
Further PDE inhibitors which are likewise preferred and can be used according to the invention are the compounds according to EP-A-0 579 496; WO-A-93/07124; U.S. Pat. No. 5,294,612 and WO-A-94/22855, the contents of which are hereby included by way of reference.
Examples of PDE inhibitors from the publications mentioned above which are particularly preferred according to the invention are the following compounds:
Further cGMP PDE inhibitors which can be used according to the invention are the following compounds:
Further PDE inhibitors which are preferred according to the invention, in particular cGMP PDE inhibitors, are disclosed in the following publications, whose contents are hereby included by way of reference:
Further PDE inhibitors which are preferred according to the invention, in particular cGMP PDE inhibitors, are selected from the group consisting of:
Further PDE inhibitors which are preferred according to the invention, in particular cGMP PDE inhibitors, are disclosed in the following publications, whose contents are hereby included by way of reference:
In addition to the two active compound components A and B mentioned above, the combination preparation according to the invention may comprise any further active compounds, provided these compounds are not contraindicated for this area of indication and do not adversely affect the action of the PDE inhibitor and the antilipemic.
These further optionally present active compounds, like the active compound components A and B, can be present either as a true mixture together with A and/or B or else spatially separated therefrom. They can be administered concomitantly or simultaneously or successively with the active compound component(s) A and/or B.
The further optionally present active compounds of the combination preparation according to the invention include, for example:
Suitable administration forms for the administration of the two active compound components A and B (and any other active compounds present) are in each case all customary administration forms. The administration is preferably carried out orally, perlingually, sublingually, nasally, transdermally, buccally, intravenously, rectally, inhalatively or parenterally. The administration is preferably carried out orally, sublingually or nasally. Very particular preference is given to oral administration.
In the case of spatially separated and/or successive administration, the two active compound components A and B can also be administered in different administration forms.
The two active compound components A and B—together or spatially separated—can in each case be converted in a manner known per se into customary formulations such as tablets including coated tablets, pills, granules, aerosols, syrups, emulsions, suspensions and solutions, using inert, non-toxic, pharmaceutically suitable carriers or solvents. In this case, the therapeutically active components A and B should in each case be present in a concentration from approximately 0.5 to 90% by weight of the total mixture, i.e. in amounts which are sufficient in order to achieve the dosage range indicated.
The formulations are prepared, for example, by extending the two active compound components A and B with solvents and/or carriers, if appropriate using emulsifying agents and/or dispersing agents, it being possible, for example if the diluent used is water, to use organic solvents as auxiliary solvents, if appropriate.
For use in humans, in the case of oral administration, dosages of from 0.001 to 50 mg/kg, preferably from 0.001 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg, in particular from 0.001 to 10 mg/kg, of body weight, particularly preferably from 0.001 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg, of the respective active compound component A or B are administered to obtain effective and useful results.
In spite of this, it may be necessary, if appropriate, to depart from the amounts mentioned, namely depending on the body weight and/or on the type of administration route, on the individual response toward the combination preparation, the manner of its formulation and the time or interval at which administration takes place. Thus, in some cases it may be adequate to manage with less than the abovementioned minimum amount, while in other cases the upper limit mentioned must be exceeded.
In the case of the administration of relatively large amounts, it may be advisable to divide these into several individual administrations over the course of the day.
The present invention is illustrated by the embodiment below in a purely exemplary manner, and by no means limited thereby.
In a placebo-controlled study, twelve adult male rabbits of the animal strain HsdHHL Watanables having a body weight of 3-5 kg, which, owing to breeding, suffer from hypercholesterolemia and arteriosclerosis, were treated with a selective cGMP PDE inhibitor (3 mg/kg, intravenously).
The animals had free access to water and, for 2 hours per day, to feed. The animals were kept in a 10/14 hour day/night rhythm (light on from 8 am onwards), and the ambient temperature was 22 to 24° C.
The selective cGMP PDE inhibitor used was 2-[2-ethoxy-5-(4-ethyl-piperazine-1-sulfonyl)-phenyl]-5-methyl-7-propyl-3H-imidazo[5,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-one hydrochloride trihydrate (Ex. 336 of WO-A-99/24433).
For intravenous injection, the PDE inhibitor was dissolved in physiological saline (0.9% by volume).
For seven days prior to the treatment with the PDE inhibitor, i.e. for 7 successive days, an antilipemic, i.e. cerivastatin sodium (i.e. the monosodium salt of cerivastatin) was administered subcutaneously to six of the twelve rabbits (1 mg/kg of body weight, cerivastatin sodium dissolved in physiological saline).
Instead of this, a physiological saline was administered subcutaneously to the other six rabbits (control).
In each case 1 day and 3 days after the 7-day pretreatment with cerivastatin sodium had ended, the six rabbits which had been pretreated with cerivastatin sodium were given the PDE inhibitor.
The other six rabbits, which had not been pretreated with cerivastatin sodium, were given the PDE inhibitor 1 day after the 7-day subcutaneous administration of the saline (control) had ended.
The erection was evaluated by measuring the length of the protruding penis using a vernier caliper. The measurement was carried out in each case 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes after the administration of the PDE inhibitor. To this end, the animals were in each case removed from the cage, held by neck hair and hind legs, turned onto their back and measured. Under rest conditions, i.e. in the non-erect state, the penis of the rabbit is not visible in the pubic region and completely covered by the penis skin.
As illustrated by the attached
Comparison of the upper and middle curves of
As shown by the experiment, even a pretreatment with the antilipemic which is initiated shortly before the administration of the PDE inhibitor causes, entirely unexpectedly, an enhanced PDE-inhibitor-triggered erection. In this manner, the activity of the PDE inhibitor is surprisingly improved, since, in view of the short pretreatment interval with the antilipemic, no (significant) improvement in the hypercholesterolemia, not to mention the arteriosclerosis, had occurred.
Without wishing to adhere to a certain theory, the synergistic effect of the PDE inhibitor together with the antilipemic can possibly be explained by an improved endothelium function, as already discussed above in the general description. This synergistic effect, however, was totally unforeseeable for the person skilled in the art and therefore has to be considered to be entirely surprising.
Thus, the embodiment confirms in an impressive manner the improved PDE-inhibitory action of the PDE inhibitor by the antilipemic administered in combination therewith.
However, the person skilled in the art will be familiar with numerous further embodiments when practicing the present invention, without being outside of the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199 44 161.8 | Sep 1999 | DE | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10070963 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11347741 | Feb 2006 | US |