Novel polymer composition

This invention relates to a process for producing a novel polymer composition in which carbon fiber (hereinafter abbreviated as "CF") and an organic polymer are strongly combined, by the electrolytic polymerization method.
A process for producing a metal-organic polymer composition is known which comprises electrolytic polymerization of a reactive monomer using a metal such as iron, copper, or silver as an electrode. However, from the industrial point of view, there is little possibility of putting this process to practical use because of a low polymerization activity of the monomer and a markedly limited amount of the polymer deposited on the metal.
For example; Subramanian, R. V. and Jakubowski, J. J. reported on "Electrolytic polymerization behavior and physical properties of vinyl monomers and Azyrydine compounds" {Polym. Eng. Sci., 18, p.590 (1978)} and on "Electrochemical coating with phosphorous-containing organic titanate compound" [Composites, 161, (1980)]; Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 72496/74 disclosed that electrolytic graft polymerization of a vinyl monomer on CF improves the tensile strength by 10-15%; and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 122894/78 disclosed that the inter-laminar shear strength (ILSS) of a CF composite is improved by electrolytic polymerization of a vinyl monomer in the presence of a peroxide using the CF as cathode.
However, these prior techniques were unsuccessful in solving the above noted problems.
In view of the above, the present inventors made intensive studies and found out that, in the production of a CF-organic polymer composition by electrolytic polymerization of a reactive monomer using an electrode of electrically conductive CF, the use of an aliphatic epoxy compound, alicyclic epoxy compound, organic titanate compound, or vinylsilane compound as part or all of the reacctive monomer results in a strikingly improved polymerization activity of reactive monomer and a novel polymer composition, unobtainable by the prior art process, in which the organic polymer is coupled in a large amount and strongly with the electrode CF and has a good sizing effect. Based on this finding, this invention has been accomplished.
Up to now, research and development have been extensively made from composite materials which are products of combining two or more materials for supplying deficiencies in the properties of the individual materials and for creating a new beneficial function. Under such circumstances, improvements in a wide variety of properties for example, mechanical strength, elastic modulus, heat distortion temperature, and electric properties have been reported concerning the formation of composite from CF which is useful as filler for reinforcement of organic polymers. These composites, however, are deficient in interfacial affinity such as compatibility or adhesion between CF and another component, viz. organic polymer, since these components distinctly differ from each other in properties, so that a sufficient combining effect cannot be exhibited. This is the present situation of the art.
For the purpose of improving CF composites in this respect, attempts have been made to enforce the interfacial affinity between organic polymer and CF, which include the graft polymerization of vinyl monomer on the surface of CF oxidized by treatment with an inorganic acid and the grafting of organic polymer onto CF irradiated with high energy radiation. However, these attempts have significant problems in the aspect of practical applications, such as the complication of operating steps and a remarkable increase in the production cost.
It is the primary object of this invention to provide a process for producing a polymer composition which solves the above noted problems.
Thus, this invention provides a process for producing a polymer composition, wherein an organic polymer is strongly bonded to CF, characterized by using an aliphatic epoxy compound, alicyclic epoxy compound, organic titanate compound, or vinylsilane compound as a part or all of reactive monomer in the process wherein the reactive monomer is electrolytically polymerized using the CF as an electrode.
When the electrolytic polymerization of reactive monomer is conducted even in the presence of a supporting electrolyte, the percentage of polymerization is generally on a considerably low level even after a long period of polymerization. On the contrary, a quite specific polymerization activity is brought about, according to this invention, by using the above cited monomer as a part or all of the reactive monomer, and a large amount of polymer is formed in several seconds on the surface of CF with such a high percentage of polymerization as to be practically useful and additionally the polymer has a good sizing effect, thereby much improving the CF binding state.
Another feature of this invention is that the interaction between CF and the polymer formed according to the process of this invention is stronger than an adhesion such as simple adsorption or the like. Thus the polymer firmly binds the CF, exerting an excellent sizing effect.
An illustration of the form of carrying out this invention is as follows: an electrolytic solution is prepared by dissolving a reactive monomer and a supporting electrolyte in a solvent. A CF roving is immersed in the electrolytic solution and D.C. voltage is applied between the CF roving and the electrolytic solution for a prescribed period to polymerize the reactive monomer on the CF surface. Thus, a large amount of uniform polymer can be formed from the reactive monomer with a high percentage of polymerization to adhere strongly to the CF surface. For this polymerization, the presence of the above four components is an essential condition. However, the supporting electrolyte need not always be present in the electrolytic solution during the electrolytic polymerization. That is, a similar polymer composition can also be obtained by using the CF pretreated with the supporting electrolyte, without adding the supporting electrolyte to the electrolytic solution.
Cations which can constitute the supporting electrolyte used in this invention are alkali metal ions (Li.sup.+, Na.sup.+, K.sup.+, Rb.sup.+, and Cs.sup.+); NH.sub.4.sup.+, and quaternary alkyl ammonium ions of the formula R.sub.4 N.sup.+, wherein R.sub.4 represents lower alkyl such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, n-hexyl, or the like; and sometimes include alkaline earth metal ions and as organic cations; substituted quaternary alkylammonium ions of the formula R.sub.n 'R".sub.4-n N.sup.+, wherein R' represents alkyl, R" represents aryl or aralkyl, and n represent an integer of 1-4; quaternary phosphonium ions (R.sub.4 P.sup.+); and tertiary sulfonium ions (R.sub.3 S.sup.+).
Anions which can constitute the supporting electrolyte are halogen ions (Cl.sup.-, Br.sup.-, and I.sup.-), sulfate ion (SO.sub.4.sup.2-), nitrate ion (NO.sub.3.sup.-), perchlorate ion (ClO.sub.4.sup.-), various sulfonate ions, various carboxylate ions, tetrafluoroborate ion (BF.sub.4.sup.-), and so forth.
Accordingly, various salts can be formed by combining the above-cited cations and anions and can be used as supporting electrolytes in this invention. It is a matter of course that bases from the above cations and acids from the above anions can also be used as the supporting electrolyte.
Thus, compounds of, for example, the following formulae, can be used as supporting electrolytes in this invention: LiCl, NaClO.sub.4, NaNO.sub.3, KClO.sub.4, EtNClO.sub.4, n-B.mu..sub.4 NClO.sub.4, n-B.mu..sub.4 NI, NaI, Et.sub.4 NBr, Et.sub.4 NI, LiClO.sub.4, NaBF.sub.4, KCl, KI, NH.sub.4 Cl, NH.sub.4 NO.sub.3, KNO.sub.3, NaClO.sub.4, LiNO.sub.3, HCl, H.sub.2 SO.sub.4, ZnCl.sub.2, NaOAc, NH.sub.4 OAc, KOH, NH.sub.4 Cl, and LiBr.
The specific reactive compound used in this invention has two or more functional groups in the molecule, which act as active sites for making strong bonds between the polymer and the CF surface and for reacting with the matrix resin. Preferred reactive compounds are:
(1) Aliphatic epoxy compounds represented by the general formula ##STR1## wherein; R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3, and R.sub.4 represent hydrogen, C.sub.1 -C.sub.20 alkyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl having C.sub.1 -C.sub.20 alkyl, or halogen; and n represents an integer of 0-50, preferably 0-20;
(2) alicylic epoxy compounds represented by the general formula ##STR2## wherein; R.sub.5 represents ##STR3## (R.sub.7 represents C.sub.1 -C.sub.20 alkylene); and R.sub.6 represents C.sub.1 -C.sub.30 alkylene;
(3) alicyclic epoxy compounds represented by the general formula ##STR4## wherein R.sub.8 represents C.sub.1 -C.sub.30 alkylene;
(4) organic titanate compounds represented by the general formula
Ti(O-R.sub.9).sub.4 (IV)
wherein R.sub.9 represents C.sub.1 -C.sub.50 alkyl;
(5) organic titanate compounds represented by the general formula ##STR5## wherein R.sub.10 represents hydrogen or C.sub.1 -C.sub.40 alkyl and R.sub.11 represents C.sub.1 -C.sub.40 alkyl; and
(6) vinylsilane compounds represented by the general formula ##STR6## wherein; R.sub.12 represents hydrogen, C.sub.1 -C.sub.20 alkyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl having C.sub.1 -C.sub.20 alkyl, or halogen; R.sub.13 represents (CH.sub.2).sub.m or COO(CH.sub.2).sub.Q (m is an integer of 0-30 and Q is an integer of 0-20); and R.sub.14 represents hydrogen, C.sub.1 -C.sub.15 alkyl, or --Y--O--Z (Y is C.sub.1 -C.sub.15 alkylene and Z is C.sub.1 -C.sub.15 alkyl).
Examples of the aliphatic epoxy compound are ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether, polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ethers, propylene glycol diglycidyl ether, polypropylene glycol diglycidyl ethers, neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether, glycerol polyglycidyl ethers, trimethylolpropane polyglycidyl ethers, pentaerythritol polyglycidyl ethers, diglycerol polyglycidyl ethers, and sorbitol polyglycidyl ethers. These are favorable in marked sizing effect and high electrolytic polymerization activity.
Examples of the alicyclic epoxy compounds are bis-epoxycyclohexylcarboxylates, bis-epoxycyclohexyldicarboxylates, and bis-epoxycyclohexyldioxanes. These are favorable in marked sizing effect and high polymerization activity.
Examples of the organic titanate compound are tetraalkoxytitaniums and monoalkoxytitaniumtrialkylates. These are favorable in marked sizing effect and high polymerization activity.
Examples of the vinylsilane compound are vinyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltriethoxysilane, vinyltripropoxysilane, vinyltributoxysilane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxymethoxy)silane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy(silane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxypropoxy)silane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxybutoxy)silane, .gamma.-methacryloxymethyltrimethoxysilane, .gamma.-methacryloxyethyltrimethoxysilane, .gamma.-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, and .gamma.-methacryloxybutyltrimethoxysilane. Particularly, vinyltriethoxysilane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane, and .gamma.-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane are favorable in marked sizing effect and high polymerization activity.
CF's used in this invention include, for example; those of high tenacity and high modulus of elasticity produced from polyacrylonitrile or copolymer thereof; those produced from high-temperature-cracked petroleum pitch, coal tar pitch, or coal-depolymerized product; and those produced by the vapor deposition method. either carbonaceous CF or graphitic CF can be applied. These various types of CF may or may not have been subjected to the usual surface-oxidizing treatment.
As to the form of CF, rovings in the form of long fibers having a fiber diameter of 0.1-5.mu. are desirable. When such CF is used, a very high sizing effect is obtained. CF of 5.mu. or less in fiber diameter, which has been conventionally used, is liable to undergo fuzzing and monofilament-break. Accordingly, it is very important for the conventional CF to be protected with a size. However, because of its poor property for handling, its uniform sizing is extremely difficult. Nevertheless, according to the process of this invention, a uniform sizing effect can be achieved without inflicting any damage on CF, this being a great advantage of this invention.
The reactive comonomer used in this invention is not particularly limited. For instance, usual radical-polymerizable vinyl monomers can be used.
Examples of such vinyl monomers are acrylic acid and esters thereof, methacrylic acid and esters thereof, styrene, acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, acrylamide, maleic anhydride, vinylpyrrolidone, and vinylpyridine.
The compositions according to this invention are all obtained in bundled form having a good interfacial adhesive property and good processability.
In this invention, the concentration of the reactive compound in the electrolytic solution ranges approximately from 0.05 to 100%, preferably from 0.1 to 50%, particularly preferably from 0.5 to 30%, by weight. The weight ratio of the reactive monomer or mixture thereof to the used CF can be varied over a wide range, that is, approximately from 500:1 to 1:500, preferably from 50:1 to 1:50.
The amount of the solvent ranges aproximately from 0.0001 to thousands times, preferably from 0.01 to 100 times, based on the total weight of CF and monomer.
Any solvent may be employed in this invention unless it hinders the achievement of the object of this invention. Suitable solvents include, for example, water; alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, glycerol, and cellosolves; ethers such as diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, and 1,4-dioxane; nitriles such as acetonitrile, butyloacetonitrile, and benzoacetonitrile; amines such as ammonia, ethylenediamine, and pyridine; amides such as formamide, dimethylformamide, and dimethylacetamide; sulfur compounds such as sulfur dioxide, dimethylsulfoxide, and sulfolane; and other miscellaneous solvents such as acetone, dichloromethane, nitromethane, nitrobenzene, and propylene carbonate.
The concentration of the supporting electrolyte used in the electrolytic solution ranges from 0.01 to 30%, preferably from 0.1 to 5%, by weight.
The electrolytic polymerization is effected by passing D.C. current between the CF and the electrolytic solution containing the reactive monomer, where the current density ranges generally from 0.01 to 20 A/dm.sup.2, preferably from 0.1 to 2 A/dm.sup.2, and the voltage is generally about 5-about 25 V. The current density, when excessively low, results in unfavorably low rate of polymerization and, when excessively high, undesirably causes degradation of the CF. The reaction period ranges approximately from 0.1 second to 5 hours, and the reaction temperature approximately from -50.degree. to 100.degree. C., preferably from 0.degree. to 80.degree. C. The reaction temperatures in individual cases are suitably chosen depending upon the reactive monomer used, where it is important to choose such temperatures as to supress the thermal polymerization to a negligible degree. If the electrolytic polymerization is carried out at such high temperatures as to cause marked thermal polymerization, the cohesive strength and uniformity of the resulting composition will be impaired. In this invention, the produced composition can be dried in a wide temperature range of approximately from 10.degree. to 300.degree. C., preferably from 30.degree. to 200.degree. C.
The interaction between the CF surface and the polymer in the novel polymer composition of this invention is stronger than the physical interaction in the cases of simple van der Waals adsorption and the like. This is supported by the fact that a large amount of unextracted polymer is found after extraction of the present composition with a good solvent of the polymer.
The novel polymer composition of this invention is useful for a wide variety of applications, e.g. aircraft, space vehicles, sporting and recreation goods, automobiles, audio, and general industrial uses.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The accompanying drawing is an illustration showing a preferred embodiment of the device for electrolytic polymerization on a CF roving according to this invention. Numerals in the drawing denote the following:
1--Electrode rollers (made of copper)
2--Guide rollers (made of glass)
3--CF roving
4--Electrolytic solution
5--Reaction vessel (made of stainless steel)
6--DC generator
7--Rheostat
8--Ammeter

This invention is illustrated in more detail with reference to the following Examples, wherein "parts" are all by weight.
EXAMPLES 1-2 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPELS 1-3
A roving of PAN-derived high-tenacity CF (made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) was set in an electrolytic polymerization reactor (made of stainless steel), as shown in the drawing, provided with copper electrode rollers and glass guide rollers. An electrolytic solution prepared by dissolving 50 g of a polyethylene glycol (n=4) diglycidyl ether (tradename: Denacol EX-821, made by Nagase Sangyo Co., Ltd.) as an aliphatic epoxy compound and 25 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of DMF was poured into the reactor to immerse the CF roving.
Then, direct current was supplied from a D.C. generator to flow between the CF which is made to act as anode, and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization of the epoxy compound at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of a rheostat.
The product roving was thoroughly washed with DMF and dried in a stream of 100.degree. C. hot air. Then, the binding state of the CF and the amount of polymer deposit on the CF were examined, where the latter was determined by weighing.
The same polymerization procedure was repeated by using a mixed monomer consisting of 25 g EX-821 and 25 g of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and the product was examined as the above.
For the purpose of comparison, electrolytic polymerization and product evaluation were conducted in the same manner but using separately MMA, which is a usual vinyl monomer; polyethylene glycol (average molecular weight 300), which has no epoxy functional group; and a mixture of MMA and the same polyethylene glycol in place of the reactive monomer of this invention.
Results of these Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in Table 1. It is evident from the Table that; as in Comparative Example 2, polyethylene glycol itself exhibits no polymerization activity and as in Comparative Example 1, the CF binding state is considerably inferior and the amount of the polymer deposit on the CF is extremely limited; in contrast to this, according to the production process of this invention, an excellent CF binding state and a much increased amount of polymer deposit are obtained, thus markedly improving the practical value of the product composition.
TABLE 1______________________________________ Denacol*.sup.1 Polyethylene CF*.sup.4 EX-821 MMA*.sup.2 glycol*.sup.3 (part)______________________________________Example 1 50 -- -- 0.123Example 2 25 25 -- "Comparative -- 50 -- "Example 1Comparative -- -- 50 "Example 2Comparative -- 25 25 "Example 3______________________________________ Supporting Reaction product*.sup.6 electrolyte Amount*.sup.8 Sodium Solvent CF*.sup.7 of polymer nitrate DMF*.sup.5 binding deposit on (parts) (parts) state CF (parts)______________________________________Example 1 2.5 500 .circleincircle. 72Example 2 " " .circleincircle. 69Comparative " " x 7Example 1Comparative " " xx 0Example 2Comparative " " x 2Example 3______________________________________ Note: *.sup.1 An aliphatic epoxy compound made by Nagase Sangyo Co., Ltd. *.sup.2 MMA: Methyl methacrylate *.sup.3 An aliphatic ether *.sup.4 A roving of PANderived hightenacity CF made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. *.sup.5 DMF: N,N--Dimethylformamide *.sup. 6 Reaction conditions Temperature: 25.degree. C. CF polarity: Positive (anode) Current density: 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 Voltage: 20 V Period of electrolysis: 60 minutes *.sup.7 CF binding state .circleincircle. very good x inferior xx much inferior *.sup.8 Based on 100 parts of charged CF.
EXAMPLES 3-7
In the same manner as in Example 1 but using separately aliphatic epoxy compounds: Denacol's EX-810, EX-840, EX-314, EX-611, and EX-321 as the reactive monomer, in place of Denacol EX-821, electrolytic polymerization was conducted, and amounts of polymer deposit of CF were examined. Results thereof are shown in Table 2 comparing with those of Example 1.
TABLE 2______________________________________ Sup- porting AmountReactive elec- of*.sup.1monomer trolyte Sol- polymerAliphatic A- Sodium vent depositepoxy mount CF nitrate DMF on CFcompound (parts) (part) (parts) (parts) (parts)______________________________________Example Denacol*.sup.2 50 0.123 2.5 500 721 EX-821Example Denacol*.sup.3 " " " " 613 EX-810Example Denacol*.sup.4 " " " " 794 EX-840Example Denacol*.sup.5 " " " " 425 EX-314Example Denacol*.sup.6 " " " " 506 EX-611Example Denacol*.sup.7 " " " " 557 EX-321______________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF. *.sup.2 Denacol EX821: ##STR7## *.sup.3 Denacol EX810: ##STR8## *.sup.4 Denacol EX840: ##STR9## *.sup.5 Denacol EX314: ##STR10## *.sup.6 Denacol EX611: ##STR11## *.sup.7 Denacol EX321: ##STR12##
As is evident from Table 2, the amount of polymer deposited on CF was considerably large in the cases of EX-821, EX-810, and EX-840 and was on somewhat lower levels in the cases of EX-314, EX-611, and EX-321.
In the next place, the percentage of polymer extracted from the product was determined on the CF-polymer composites obtained in Examples 1-7, by weighing out about 0.1 g of each composition together with a cylindrical filter paper and subjecting the composition sample to Soxhlet extraction with chloroform for 24 hours. For comparison, the same test was conducted on a composition (Comparative Example 4) prepared by a bulk polymerization in the presence of the same CF roving using a common radical polymerization initiator. Results of the test are shown in Table 3. As can be seen therefrom, whereas the polymer in the composition of Comparative Example 4 was completely extracted out by the 24-hour extraction, very low percentages of polymers were extracted from the compositions prepared according to this invention, that is, most of the polymers were firmly bonded to CF without being extracted.
TABLE 3______________________________________ Percentage Amount of polymer of extracted polymer with deposit chloroform on CF forPolymerization process (parts)*.sup.2 24 hours______________________________________Example Process of this invention using 72 31 Denacol EX-821 as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 69 42 a mixture of Denacol EX-821 and MMA as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 61 33 Denacol EX-810 as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 79 34 Denacol EX-840 as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 42 55 Denacol eX-314 as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 50 66 Denacol EX-611 as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention 55 77 using Denacol EX-321 as reactive monomerCom- Bulk polymerization using 95 100parative DDS*.sup.1 as initiatorExample______________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 DDS: Diaminodiphenylsulfone *.sup.2 Based on 100 parts of charged CF
EXAMPLE 8
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner by using different kinds of CF. Results of evaluating the product composition are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4______________________________________ Percentage Amount of polymer Average of*.sup.3 extracted diameter polymer with Nature of mono- deposit chloro- of filament on CF form forNo. CF fiber (.mu.) (parts) 24 hours______________________________________1 From pitch*.sup.1 Carbo- 12.5 75 3 (T-101S) naceous2 From pitch*.sup.1 Graphitic " 70 5 (T-201S)3 From PAN*.sup.2 Carbo- " 72 3 (HT) naceous4 From PAN*.sup.2 Graphitic " 71 6 (HM)______________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Krecatow made by Kureha Chem. Ind. Co., Ltd. *.sup.2 Made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. *.sup.3 Conditions of electrolytic polymerization CF, 0.123 part; Sodium nitrate, 25 parts; DMF, 500 parts; EX821, 50 parts
As can be seen from Table 4, in the process of this invention, no dependency on the kind of CF was observed of polymerization activity, amounts of polymer deposited on CF were generally satisfactory, and percentages of polymer extracted from the product composition were low, that is, most of the polymers were firmly bonded to CF without being extracted.
EXAMPLE 9
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1 but using each reactive comonomer (25 g) shown in Table 5 together with Denacol EX-821 (25 g). Results of evaluating the product composition are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________ Amount of*.sup.5 Supporting Polarity of polymerReactive comonomer electrolyte PAN- Solvent CF during deposit onRun Amount NaNO.sub.3 derived CF DMF elec- CFNo. Kind (parts) (parts) (part) (parts) trolysis (parts)__________________________________________________________________________1 MMA 25 2.5 0.123 500 anode 802 ST*.sup.1 " " " " " 583 Vinyl " " " " " 65 acetate4 BuA*.sup.2 " " " " " 725 MAA*.sup.3 " " " " " 706 GMA/MAA*.sup.4 " " " " " 957 GMA/BuA " " " " " 90__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 ST: Styrene monomer *.sup.2 BuA: nButyl acrylate *.sup.3 MAA: Methacrylic acid *.sup.4 GMA: Glycidyl methacrylate *.sup.5 Based on 100 parts of charged CF.
Weight ratio of one comonomer to the other in the run Nos. 6 and 7 was 50:50.
As is evident from Table 5, any usual vinyl monomer radical-polymerizable can be used as a reactive comonomer in this invention.
EXAMPLE 10
A roving (0.123 g) of PAN-derived CF (HT, made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) was immersed in a solution prepared by dissolving 250 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of demineralized water. After being thoroughly dried, the treated CF was all immersed in an electrolytic solution (50 g of Denacol EX-821 in 500 g of DMF) contained in the reactor of the same electrolytic polymerization apparatus as used in Example 1. Then, direct current from the D.C. generator was flowed between the CF acting as anode and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of the rheostat.
The product composition was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 1. The results showed that the amount of polymer deposit on the CF was 60 parts and the polymer produced from the reactive monomer was bonded uniformly and firmly to the CF surface.
EXAMPLE 11
A unidirectional composite was prepared from a CF-polymer composition obtained from a mixture of 1,000 parts of Denacol EX-821, 24.6 parts of CF, 50 parts of sodium nitrate and 100,000 parts of DMF according to the present invention and a general-purpose epoxy resin of bisphenol A type, and was shaped into test pieces, which were then measured for mechanical properties such as strand strength, inter-laminar shear strength, and flexural strength. For comparison, another unidirectional composite (simple blend) was similarly prepared by using untreated CF and evaluated. Results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________ Mechanical properties Inter-*.sup.1 laminar Strand shear Flexural*.sup.1Unidirection strength strength strengthcomposite kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2______________________________________Blend of CF-polymer 404 9.90 189.2composition of thisinvention withepoxy resinSimple blend of 340 7.30 148.1untreated CF withepoxy resin______________________________________ Note: *.sup.1 CF content 60 vol. %
Table 6 indicates that the CF-polymer composition of this invention exhibits excellent mechanical properties in practical applications.
EXAMPLES 12-13 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 5-7
A roving of PAN-derived high-tenacity CF was set in the stainless steel reactor of an electrolytic polymerization apparatus, as shown in the drawing, provided with electrode rollers and guide rollers. An electrolytic solution prepared by dissolving 50 g of bis(3,4-epoxy cyclohexyl)methyl adipate as an alicyclic epoxy compound and 25 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of DMF was poured into the reactor to immerse the CF roving.
Then, direct current from a D.C. generator was flowed between the CF as anode and the electrytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymarization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of a rheostat.
The product roving was thoroughly washed with DMF and dried in a stream of 100.degree. C. hot air. Then, the binding state of the CF and the amount of polymer deposited on the CF were examined, where the latter was determined by weighing.
In the same manner, electrolytic polymerization was carried out by using a mixture of 25 g of the above alicyclic epoxy compound and 25 g of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and the product was evaluated.
For comparison, electrolytic polymerization and product evaluation were conducted in the same manner but using separately MMA, which is a usual vinyl monomer; ethyl glycidate, ##STR13## which is a noncylic monofunctional aliphatic epoxy compound; and a mixture of MMA and ethyl glycidate; as a reactive monomer.
Results of these Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in Table 7. As is evident from Table 7, the CF binding state is inferior and the amount of polymer deposited on CF is extremely limited, in Comparative Examples 5, 6, and 7; in contrast to this, an excellent CF binding state and a much increased amount of polymer deposit are obtained, according to the process of this invention, thus markedly improving the practicality.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________ SupportingReactive monomer electrolyte Reaction product*.sup.6(parts) Sodium Solvent CF*.sup.7 Amount of*.sup.8ERL-*.sup.1 Ethyl*.sup.3 CF*.sup.4 nitrate DMF*.sup.5 binding polymer deposit4299 MMA*.sup.2 glycidate (part) (parts) (parts) state on CF (parts)__________________________________________________________________________Example 12 50 -- -- 0.123 2.5 500 .circleincircle. 105Example 13 25 25 -- " " " .circleincircle. 88Compara- -- 50 -- " " " x 3tiveExample 5Compara- -- -- 50 " " " x 5tiveExample 6Compara- -- 25 25 " " " xx 4tiveExample 7__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: ##STR14## *.sup.2 MMA: Methyl methacrylate ##STR15## *.sup.4 PANderived hightencity CF made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. *.sup.5 DMF: N,Ndimethylformamide *.sup.6 Reaction conditions Temperature: 25.degree. C. CF polarity: Positive (anode) Current density: 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 Voltage: 20 V Period of electrolysis: 60 minutes *.sup.7 CF binding state .circleincircle. very good X inferior XX much inferior *.sup.8 Based on 100 parts of charged CF.
EXAMPLES 14-16
Polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 12 but using separately the alicylic epoxy compounds shown in Table 8 as an reactive monomer, and amounts of polymer deposited on CF were examined. Results there of together with those of Example 12 are shown in Table 8.
TABLE 8______________________________________Reactive Sup-monomer porting AmountAlicy- electro- of*.sup.1clic lyte Sol- polymerepoxy A- Sodium vent depositcom- mount CF nitrate DMF on CFpound (parts) (part) (parts) (parts)______________________________________Example A*.sup.2 50 0.123 2.5 500 105-12Example B*.sup.3 " " " " 101-14Example C*.sup.4 " " " " 97-15Example D*.sup.5 " " " " 90-16______________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF. *.sup.2 A: Bis [(3,4epoxy cyclohexyl)methyl] adipate ##STR16## *.sup.3 B: 2(3,4-Epoxycyclohexyl-5,5-spiro-3,4-epoxy)cyclohexane-m-dioxan ##STR17## *.sup.4 C: (3,4Epoxycyclohexyl)methyl 3,4epoxy-cyclohexanecarboxylate ##STR18## *.sup.5 D: Vinylcyclohexene dioxide ##STR19##
As can be seen from Table 8, the amount of polymer deposited on CF was on high levels for both the polyfunctional alicyclic epoxy compounds.
Then, the percentage of polymer extraction from the product was determined on the CF-polymer compositions obtained in Examples 12-16, by weighing about 0.1 g of each composition together with a cylindrical filter paper and subjecting the composition sample to a Soxhlet extraction with chloroform for 24 hours. For comparison, the same test was conducted on a composition (Comparative Example 8) prepared by a bulk polymerization in the presence of the same CF roving using a common polymerization initiator. Results of the tests are shown in Table 9. Therefrom it can be seen that, whereas the polymer in the composition of Comparative Example 8 was completely extracted by the 24 hour-extraction, those in the compositions obtained by the process of this invention were extracted in low percentages, that is, most of the polymers were firmly bonded without being extracted.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________ Percentage of Amount of polymer*.sup.1 polymer extracted deposited on CF with chloroformPolymerization process (parts) for 24 hours__________________________________________________________________________Example Process of this invention using 105 212 A as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 88 313 a mixture of A and MMA as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 101 214 B as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 97 415 C as reactive monomerExample Process of this invention using 98 516 D as reactive monomerCom- Bulk polymerization 98 100parativeExample__________________________________________________________________________ Note: *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF
EXAMPLE 17
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 12 but using different kinds of CF. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 10.
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________ Average Amount of Percentage of Nature diameter of polymer deposit polymer extreatedRun of monofilament on CF with chloroformNo. CF fiber (.mu.) (parts) for 24 hours__________________________________________________________________________1 From pitch Carbo- 12.5 109 2 naceous2 " Graphitic " 100 33 From PAN Carbo- " 105 2 naceous4 " Graphitic " 102 5__________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of electrolytic polymerization: CF, 0.123 part; sodium nitrate, 2.5 parts; BRL4290, 50 parts; DMF, 500 parts
As can be seen from Table 10, in the process of this invention, no dependency on the kind of CF was observed of polymerization activity, amounts of polymer deposit on CF were generally satisfactory, and percentages of polymer extracted from the product compositions were low, that is, most of the polymers were firmly bonded to CF without being extracted.
EXAMPLE 18
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 13 but using each of the monomers shown in Table 11, as a reactive monomer copolymerizable with the alicyclic epoxy compound. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 11.
TABLE 11__________________________________________________________________________ Amount of Supporting Polarity of Amount of Re- reactive electrolyte CF during polymer active comonomer Sodium PAN- Solvent electrolytic deposit on comono- added nitrate derived CF DMF polymeriza- CFNo. mer (parts) (parts) (part) (parts) tion (parts)__________________________________________________________________________1 MMA 25 2.5 0.123 500 anode 1252 ST " " " " " 1033 Vinyl " " " " " 110 acetate4 BuA " " " " " 1175 MAA " " " " " 1156 GMA/MAA " " " " " 1407 GMA/BuA " " " " " 135__________________________________________________________________________
As is evident from Table 11, any usual vinyl monomer radical-polymerizable can be used as a reactive comonomer in this invention.
EXAMPLE 19
A roving (0.123 g) of PAN-derived CF (HT, made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) was immersed in a solution prepared by dissolving 250 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of demineralized water. After being thoroughly dried, the treated CF was all immersed in an electrolytic solution (50 g of ERL-4299 in 500 g of DMF) contained in the reactor of the same electrolytic polymerization apparatus as used in Example 12. Then, direct current from the D.C. generator was flowed between the CF as anode and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of the rheostat.
The product composition was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 12. The results showed that the amount of polymer deposited on the CF was 80 parts per 100 parts of CF and the polymer produced from the reactive monomer was bonded uniformly and firmly to the CF surface.
EXAMPLE 20
A unidirectional composite was prepared from a CF-polymer composition obtained from a mixture of 1,000 parts of a reactive monomer ERL-4299, 24.6 parts of CF, 50 parts of sodium nitrate and 100,000 parts of DMF according to the present invention and a general-purpose epoxy resin of bisphenol A type, and was measured for its mechanical properties such as strand strength, inter-laminar shear strength, and flexural strength. For comparison, another unidirectional composite (simple blend) was similarly prepared by using untreated CF and evaluated. Results are shown in Table 12.
TABLE 12______________________________________ Mechanical properties Inter-*.sup.1 laminar Strand shear Flexural*.sup.1 strength strength strength kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2______________________________________Blend of the CF-polymer 428 11.80 193.3composition of thisinvention with epoxyresinSimple blend of CF 365 7.50 152.0with epoxy resin______________________________________ *.sup.1 CF content, 60 vol. %
Table 12 indicates that the CF-polymer composition of this invention exhibits excellent mechanical properties in practical applications.
EXAMPLES 21-22 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 9-11
A roving of PAN-derived high-tenacity CF was set in the reactor of an electrolytic polymerization apparatus, as shown in the drawing, provided with electrode rollers and guide rollers. An electrolytic solution prepared by dissolving 50 g of isopropoxytitanium triisostearate (TTS, made by Toyo Soda Co., Ltd.) as an organic titanate and 25 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of DMF was poured into the reactor to immerse the CF roving.
Then, the electrolytic polymerization was effected at room temperature for one hour by flowing direct current between the CF as anode and the electrolytic solution from a D.C. generator. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of a rheostat.
The product roving was thoroughly washed with DMF and dried in a stream of 100.degree. C. hot air. Then, the binding state of the CF and the amount of polymer deposited on the CF were examined, where the latter was determined by weighing.
The above procedure was repeated by using a mixture of TTS and 25 g of MMA.
For comparison, the above procedure was further repeated by using separately MMA, which is a usual vinyl monomer; tetrapropyltitanium, which is an organo titanium compound having no alkoxyl group; and a mixture of MMA and tetrapropyltitanium; as a reactive monomer. These products were similarly examined. Results thereof are shown in Table 13.
As is evident from Table 13, the CF binding state is inferior and the amount of polymer deposited on CF is extremely limited, in Comparative Examples 9, 10, and 11; in contrast to this, an excellent CF binding state and a much increased amount of polymer deposit are obtained, according to the process of this invention, thus markedly improving the practicality.
TABLE 13__________________________________________________________________________ Reduction product*.sup.1 Reactive monomer Supporting Amount of*.sup.3 (parts) electrolyte polymer Tetra- Sodium Solvent CF*.sup.2 deposited propyl- CF nitrate DMF binding on CF TTS MMA titanium (part) (parts) (parts) state (parts)__________________________________________________________________________Example 50 -- -- 0.123 2.5 500 .circleincircle. 8221Example 25 25 -- " " " .circleincircle. 7022Comparative -- 50 -- " " " X 5Example 9Comparative -- -- 50 " " " XX 0Example 10Comparative -- 25 25 " " " XX 3Example 11__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Reaction conditions Temperature: 25.degree. C. CF polarity: Positive (anode) Current density: 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 Voltage: 20 V Period of electrolysis: 60 minutes *.sup.2 CF binding state .circleincircle. very good X inferior XX much inferior *.sup. 3 Based on 100 parts of charged CF.
EXAMPLES 23-25
Polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 21 but using separately tetrastearyl titanate (TST), tetraoctyl titanate (TOT), and tetra-n-butyl titanate [B-1(TBT)] (all made by Toyo Soda Co., Ltd.) as an reactive monomer in place of TTS, and amounts of polymer deposits on CF were examined. Results thereof together with those of Example 21 are shown in Table 14.
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________ Supporting electrolyte Amount ofReactive monomer Sodium Solvent polymer depositOrganic Amount CF nitrate DMF on CFtitanate (parts) (part) (parts) (parts) (parts)__________________________________________________________________________Example 21 TTS*.sup.2 50 0.123 2.5 500 82Example 23 TST*.sup.3 " " " " 77Example 24 TOT*.sup.4 " " " " 71Example 25 B-1*.sup.5 " " " " 65 (TBT)__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF. ##STR20## *.sup.3 TST: Ti(OC.sub.17 H.sub.35).sub.4 ##STR21## *.sup.5 B1(TBT): Ti(On.C.sub.4 H.sub.9).sub.4
As can be seen from Table 14, the amount of polymer deposited on CF was on high levels for all the organic titanates.
Then, the percentage of polymer extraction was determined on the CF-polymer compositions obtained in Examples 21-25, by weighing out about 0.1 g of each composition together with a cylindrical filter paper and subjecting the composite sample to Soxhlet extraction with chloroform for 24 hours. Results of the tests are shown in Table 15. Therefrom it has proved that the polymers in the compositions obtained by the process of this invention are for the most part bonded firmly to CF without being extracted.
TABLE 15______________________________________ Amount of poly-*.sup.1 Percentage of polymer mer deposit on extracted with chloro- CF form for 24 hours (parts) (%)______________________________________Example 21 82 6Example 22 70 8Example 23 77 7Example 24 71 8Example 25 65 9______________________________________ Note: *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF
EXAMPLE 26
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 21 but using different kinds of CF. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 16.
TABLE 16______________________________________ Average Amount of*.sup.1 Percentage of diameter polymer polymer ex- Nature of mono- deposited tracted withRun of filament on CF chloroformNo. CF fiber (.mu.) (parts) for 24 hours______________________________________1 From Carbon- 12.5 85 7 pitch aceous2 From Graphitic " 70 9 pitch3 From Carbon- " 82 6 PAN aceous4 From Graphitic " 78 9 PAN______________________________________ Note: *.sup.1 Conditions of electrolytic polymerization: CF, 0.123 part; sodium nitrate, 2.5 parts; TTS, 50 parts; DMF, 500 parts
As is evident from Table 16, in the process of this invention, no dependency of the kind of CF was observed of polymerization activity, amounts of polymer deposited on CF were generally satisfactory, and percentages of polymer extracted from the product compositions were low indicating that most of the polymers were firmly bonded to CF without being extracted.
EXAMPLE 27
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 22 but using 25 g of the organic titanate and 25 g each of the comonomers shown in Table 17 as a reactive monomer copolymerizable with the organic titanate. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 17.
TABLE 17__________________________________________________________________________ Supporting Polarity of Amount of electrolyte CF during polymer Sodium PAN- Solvent electrolytic deposit Reactive Amount nitrate derived CF DMF polymeriza- on CFNo. comonomer (parts) (parts) (part) (parts) tion (parts)__________________________________________________________________________1 MMA 25 2.5 0.123 500 anode 892 ST " " " " " 673 Vinyl " " " " " 74 acetate4 BuA " " " " " 815 MAA " " " " " 796 GMA/MAA " " " " " 1047 GMA/BuA " " " " " 99__________________________________________________________________________
As is evident from Table 17, any usual vinyl monomer radical-polymerizable can be used as a reactive comonomer in this invention.
EXAMPLE 28
A roving (0.123 g) of PAN-derived CF was immersed in a solution prepared by dissolving 250 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of demineralized water. After being thoroughly dried, the treated CF was all immersed in an electrolytic solution (TTS in 500 g of DMF) contained in the reactor of the same electrolytic polymerization apparatus as used in Example 21. Then, direct current from the D.C. generator was flowed between the CF as anode and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of the rheostat.
The product composition was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 21. The results showed that the amount of polymer deposited on the CF was 71 parts per 100 parts of CF and the polymer was bonded uniformly and firmly to the CF surface.
The thus obtained CF-polymer composition was extended into a sheet so as to align unidirectionally and was impregnated with a general-purpose epoxy resin of bisphenol A type. The resulting composite sheet was shaped into test pieces, which were then measured for mechanical properties such as strand strength, interlaminar shear strength, and flexural strength. For comparison, another composite sheet (simple blend) was similarly prepared by using untreated CF and evaluated. Results are shown in Table 18.
TABLE 18______________________________________ Mechanical properties Inter-*.sup.1 laminar Strand shear Flexural*.sup.1 strength strength strength kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2______________________________________Blend of the CF-polymer 419 11.00 190.0composition of thisinvention with epoxyresinSimple-blend of CF 365 7.50 152.0with epoxy resin______________________________________ *.sup.1 CF content 60 Vol %
Table 18 indicates that the CF-polymer composition of this invention exhibits excellent mechanical properties in practical applications.
EXAMPLES 29-30 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 13-15
A roving of PAN-derived high-tenacity CF (made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) was set in the stainless steel reactor of an electrolytic polymerization apparatus, as shown in the drawing, provided with copper electrode rollers and glass guide rollers. An electrolytic solution prepared by dissolving 50 g of vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane (KBC 1003, made by Shinetsu Chem. Ind. Co., Ltd.) as a vinylsilane compound and 25 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of DMF was poured into the reactor to immerse the CF roving.
Then, direct current from a D.C. generator was flowed between the CF as anode and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of a rheostat.
The product roving was throughly washed with DMF and dried in a stream of 100.degree. C. hot air. Then the binding state of the CF and the amount of polymer deposited on the CF were examined, where the latter was determined by weighing.
The above procedure was repeated by using mixture of 25 g of KBC 1003 and 25 g of MMA. For comparison, the above procedure was further repeated by using separately MMA, which has no silicon atom; trimethylethoxysilane, which is a saturated silane having no double bond; and a mixture of MMA and trimethylethoxysilane; as a reactive monomer. These products were similarly examined. Results thereof are shown in Table 19.
As is evident from Table 19, saturated silane as used in Comparative Example 14 exhibits no polymerization activity; when MMA used singly as in Comparative Example 13, the CF binding state is considerably inferior and the amount of polymer deposited on the CF is extremely limited; in contrast, according to the process of this invention, an excellent CF binding state and a much increased amount of polymer deposited on CF are obtained, thus markedly improving the practical value.
TABLE 19__________________________________________________________________________ Reactive monomer Reaction product*.sup.6 (parts) Supporting Amount of*.sup.8 Tri-*.sup.3 electrolyte polymer methyl- Sodium Solvent CF*.sup.7 deposited KBC-*.sup.1 ethoxy- CF*.sup.4 nitrate DMF*.sup.5 binding on CF 1003 MMA*.sup.2 silane (part) (parts) (parts) state (parts)__________________________________________________________________________Example 29 50 -- -- 0.123 2.5 500 .circleincircle. 58Example 30 25 25 -- " " " .circleincircle. 55Comparative -- 50 -- " " " X 7Example 13Comparative -- -- 50 " " " X 1Example 14Comparative -- 25 25 " " " X 3Example 15__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Vinyltris (.beta.-methoxyethoxy) silane (a vinylsilane, made by Shinetsu Chem. Ind. Co., Ltd.) *.sup.2 MMA: Methyl methacrylate *.sup.3 A saturated silane *.sup.4 A roving of PANderived hightenacity CF (made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) *.sup.5 DMF: N,N--Dimethylformamide *.sup.6 Reaction conditions Temperature: 25.degree. C. CF polarity: Positive (anode) Current density: 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 Voltage: 20 V Period of electrolysis: 60 minutes *.sup.7 CF binding state .circleincircle. very good X inferior XX much inferior *.sup.8 Based on 100 parts of charged CF
EXAMPLES 31-35
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 29 but using separately vinyltriethoxysilane, .gamma.-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane, vinyltripropoxysilane, vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxypropoxy)silane, and .gamma.-methacryloxybutyltrimethoxysilane as a reactive monomer in place of vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane, and amounts of polymer deposited on CF were examined. Results thereof are shown in Table 20 comparing with those of Example 29.
TABLE 20__________________________________________________________________________ Supporting Amount of electrolyte polymerReactive monomer Sodium Solvent deposited Amount CF nitrate DMF on CFVinylsilane (parts) (parts) (parts) (parts) (parts)__________________________________________________________________________Example Vinyl-tris(.beta.- 50 0.123 2.5 500 5829 methoxyethoxy)- silaneExample Vinyltriethoxy- " " " " 5031 silaneExample .gamma.-Methacryloxy- " " " " 5232 propyltrimethoxy- silaneExample Vinyl-tripropoxy- " " " " 3233 silaneExample Vinyl-tris(.beta.- " " " " 4234 methoxypropoxy)- silaneExample .gamma.-Methacryloxy- " " " " 2835 butyltrimethoxy- silane__________________________________________________________________________ *.sup.1 Based on 100 parts of charged CF
As shown in Table 20, the amount of polymer deposited on CF was fairly large for vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)-silane, vinyltriethoxysilane, and .gamma.-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and on somewhat lower levels for vinyltripropoxysilane and .gamma.-methacryloxybutyltrimethoxysilane.
Then, the percentage of polymer extraction was determined on the CF-polymer compositions obtained in Examples 29-35, by weighing out about 0.1 g of each composition together with a cylindrical filter paper and subjecting the composition sample to Soxhlet extraction with chloroform for 24 hours. For comparison, the same test was conducted on a composition (Comparative Example 16) prepared by a bulk polymerization in the presence of the same CF roving using a common radical polymerization initiator. Results of these tests are shown in Table 21. Therefrom it has proved that, while the polymer in the composition of Comparative Example 16 is completely extracted during 24 hours, the polymer of the composition obtained by the process of this invention is scarcely extracted, that is, most of the polymer is firmly bonded to the CF without being extracted.
TABLE 21__________________________________________________________________________ Amount of polymer*.sup.2 Percentage of polymer deposited on CF extracted with chloro-Polymerization process (parts) form for 24 hours__________________________________________________________________________Example Process of this invention, 58 529 Reactive monomer: Vinyl- tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silaneExample Process of this invention, 55 630 Reactive monomer: Mixture of vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)- silane and MMAExample Process of this invention, 50 531 Reactive monomer: Vinyltri- ethoxysilaneExample Process of this invention 52 532 Reactive monomer: .gamma.-Methacryl- oxypropyltrimethoxysilaneExample Process of this invention 32 833 Reactive monomer: Vinyl- tripropoxysilaneExample Process of this invention, 42 734 Reactive monomer: Vinyl- tris(.beta.-methoxypropoxy)silaneExample Process of this invention, 28 935 Reactive monomer: .gamma.-Methacryl- oxybutyl trimethoxysilaneCom- Bulk polymerization process 85 100parative Initiator: AIBN*.sup. 1Example16__________________________________________________________________________ *.sup.1 AIBN: Azoisobutyronitrile *.sup.2 Based on 100 parts of charged CF.
EXAMPLE 36
Electrolytic polymerizatiom was conducted in the same manner as in Example 29 but using different kinds of CF. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 22.
TABLE 22__________________________________________________________________________ Average diameter Amount of*.sup.3 Percentage of Nature of mono- polymer deposited polymer extracted of filament on CF with chloroformNo. CF fiber (.mu.) (parts) for 24 hours__________________________________________________________________________1 From pitch*.sup.1 Carbonaceous 12.5 59 5 (T-101S)2 From pitch*.sup.1 Graphitic " 55 7 (T-201S)3 From Pan*.sup.2 Carbonaceous " 58 5 (HT)4 From Pan*.sup.2 Graphitic " 57 8 (HM)__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: *.sup.1 Tradename: Kurekatow, made by Kureha Chem. Ind. Co., Ltd. *.sup.2 Made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. *.sup.3 Conditions of electrolytic polymerization. CF, 0.123 part; DMF, 500 parts; NaNO.sub.3, 25 parts; Vinyltris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane, 5 parts.
As can be seen from Table 22, in the process of this invention, no dependency on the kind of CF was observed of polymerization activity, amounts of polymer deposited on CF were generally satisfactory, and percentages of polymer extracted from the product compositions were low, indicating that most of the polymers were firmly bonded to CF without being extracted.
EXAMPLE 37
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 29 but using 25 g of the vinylsilane compound and 25 g each of the monomers shown Table 23 as a reactive comonomer copolymerizable with the vinylsilane compound. Results of evaluating the product compositions are shown in Table 23.
TABLE 23__________________________________________________________________________ Polarity Amount of Amount of Supporting of CF polymer comonomer electrolyte PAN- Solvent during deposited Reactive added NANO.sub.3 derived CF DMF electro- on CFNo. comonomer (parts) (parts) (part) (parts) lysis (parts)__________________________________________________________________________1 MMA 25 2.5 0.123 500 anode 502 ST " " " " " 283 Vinyl acetate " " " " " 354 BuA " " " " " 425 MAA " " " " " 406 GMA/MAA " " " " " 657 GMA/BuA " " " " " 60__________________________________________________________________________
As is evident from Table 23, any usual vinyl monomer radical-polymerizable can be used as a reactive comonomer in this invention.
EXAMPLE 38
A roving (0.123 g) of PAN-derived CF (HT, made by Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.) was immersed in a solution prepared by dissolving 250 g of sodium nitrate as a supporting electrolyte in 500 g of demineralized water. After being thoroughly dried, the treated CF was all immersed in an electrolytic solution [50 g of vinyl-tris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane in 500 g of DMF] contained in the reactor of the same electrolytic polymerization apparatus as used in Example 29. Then, direct current from the D.C. generator was flowed between the CF as anode and the electrolytic solution, thereby carrying out the electrolytic polymerization at room temperature for one hour. During the electrolysis, the current density was adjusted to 0.27 A/dm.sup.2 by means of the rheostat.
The product composition was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 29. The results showed that the amount of polymer deposited on the CF was 52 parts per 100 parts of CF and the polymer was bonded uniformly and firmly to the CF surface.
EXAMPLE 39
A unidirectional composite was prepared from the CF-polymer composition obtained from a mixture of 1,000 parts of KBC 1003 [vinyltris(.beta.-methoxyethoxy)silane], 24.6 parts of CF, 50 parts of sodium nitrate and 100,000 parts of DMF according to the present invention and a general-purpose epoxy resin of bisphenol A type, and was shaped into test pieces, which were then measured for mechanical properties such as strand strength, interlaminar shear strength, and flexural strength. For comparison, another composite sheet (simple blend) was similarly prepared by using untreated CF and evaluated. Results are shown in Table 24.
TABLE 24______________________________________ Mechanical properties Inter-*.sup.1 laminar Strand shear Flexural*.sup.1 strength strength strength kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2 kg/mm.sup.2______________________________________Blend of the CF-polymer 398 9.88 187.6composition of thisinvention with epoxyresinSimple blend of CF 340 7.30 148.1with epoxy resin______________________________________ *.sup.1 CF content 60 Vol. %
Table 24 indicates that the CF-polymer composition of this invention exhibits excellent mechanical properties in practical use.
EXAMPLE 40
Electrolytic polymerization was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1 or 12 but by using CF's which were defferent in average diameter of monofilament as shown in Table 25. Results of evaluating the resulting compositions are shown in Table 25. The results have revealed that the use of very fine CF further improves the CF binding state and markedly increases the amount of polymer deposited on CF.
TABLE 25__________________________________________________________________________ Reaction productCF Amount of polymerAverage diameter Reactive monomer deposited on CF (parts of monofilament Denacol ERL- CF-binding per 100 parts ofNo. (.mu.m) (part) EX-821 4299 state charged CF)__________________________________________________________________________1 2.0 0.123 50 parts -- .circleincircle. 2202 3.0 " " -- .circleincircle. 1803 5.0 " " -- .circleincircle. 1634 2.0 " -- 50 parts .circleincircle. 2805 3.0 " -- " .circleincircle. 2636 5.0 " -- " .circleincircle. 235__________________________________________________________________________

Number	Date	Country
57-183294	Oct 1982	JPX
57-183295	Oct 1982	JPX
57-226652	Dec 1982	JPX
58-6601	Jan 1983	JPX

Number	Name	Date
4039697	Isawa	Aug 1977
4075133	Sekmukus	Feb 1978
4248753	Buchwalter	Feb 1981
4272346	Jakubowski	Jun 1981

Novel polymer composition

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (4)

US Referenced Citations (4)