Nozzle arrangement for well cleaning apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6397864
  • Patent Number
    6,397,864
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 8, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 4, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus for cleaning subterranean wellbores is described. The apparatus comprises a rotatable jet head with less than five axially separated nozzles through which an abrasive fluid is discharged. The nozzles are mounted with an axial separation of preferably more than 0.5 times the nozzle diameter.
Description




The present invention relates to an improved nozzle arrangement for a jet drilling apparatus. The invention particularly relates to such an apparatus as applied for cleaning of surface and subterranean pipes and boreholes for hydrocarbon reservoir exploration and production, more particularly to the removal of scale and other deposits from the inside diameter of well tubulars and boreholes.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




It has been common practice for many years to run a continuous reeled pipe (known extensively in the industry as “coil tubing”) into a well to perform operations utilising the circulation of treating and cleanout fluids such as water, oil, acid, corrosion inhibitors, hot oil, nitrogen, foam, etc. Coil tubing, being continuous rather than jointed, is run into and out of a well with continuous movement of the tubing through a coil tubing injector.




Coil tubing is frequently used to circulate cleanout fluids through a well for the purpose of eliminating sand bridges, scale, and similar downhole obstructions. Often such obstructions are very difficult and occasionally impossible to remove because of the inability to rotate the coil tubing and drill out such obstructions. These well tubulars vary from unperforated and perforated pipe, large diameter casing, production tubing, and slotted or wire-wrapped well liner. Well tubulars often become plugged or coated with corrosion products, sediments and hydrocarbon deposits. The deposits may consist of silicates, sulphates, sulphide, carbonates, calcium, and organic growth.




It is desirable to perform drilling type operations in wells through use of coil tubing which can be run into and removed from a well quickly in addition to performing the usual operations which require only the circulation of fluids. The same types of well servicing can also be performed with various small diameter work strings. The present invention may be used with such work strings and is not limited to coil tubing.




High pressure fluid jet systems have been used for many years to clean the inside diameter of well tubulars. Examples of such systems are disclosed in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,720,264, 3,811,499, 3,829,134, 3,850,241, 4,088,191, 4,349,073, 4,441,557, 4,442,899, 4,518,041, 4,919,204, 5,181,576 or 5,337,819.




In U.S. Pat. No. 3,720,264, there is disclosed a jet tool for cleaning a liner. The jet tool includes three pairs of jet nozzles arranged in a staggered manner with each pair of nozzles slightly rotated with respect to the others.




In U.S. Pat. No.4,442,899, the nozzles are circumferentially spaced from each other about 90 degrees and separated such as to form a spiral.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,819 discloses a washing tool for removing internal deposits in tubing parts and components in wells for oil and gas production. The known tool comprises an actuation sleeve which has lateral dimensions related to the deposits to be removed. The sleeve actuates a valve to discharge a fluid jet through layers of circumferentially arranged discharge nozzles.




In view of the above cited prior art, it is an object of the invention to provide an improved fluid jet cleaning tool to remove scale and other deposits from the inside diameter of tubulars and boreholes for the exploration and production of hydrocarbon reservoirs. It is a particular object of the invention to provide a novel nozzle arrangement for such a fluid jet cleaning tool.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention there is provided a fluid jet cleaning apparatus for cleaning of tubulars and boreholes for hydrocarbon reservoir exploration and production, said apparatus comprising a rotatable nozzle head including less than five axially separated nozzles mounted on a part of a lower end of a hollow tubular.




It has been recognised that the number of nozzles of a well cleaning tool can be reduced to less than five, preferably less than four without significant loss of performance.




Furthermore, it was found that the efficiency of the tool can be increased over tools with an equal number of nozzles by axially separating the nozzles. The preferred axial separation between two adjacent nozzles is larger than 0.5 times the nozzle diameter, but smaller than 20 times, more preferably 10 times, the nozzle diameter.




The preferred angular separation is either 180 degrees in case of two nozzles, 120 degrees in case of three nozzles or for four nozzles, a separation of 180 degrees between a pair of nozzles with the second pair preferably rotated by 90 degrees with respect to the first pair of nozzles.




The cleaning tool may also comprise a gauge defining sleeve with an essentially annular edge of a width of less than 10 mm, preferably 5 mm. The nozzle located closest to the sleeve is targeted at an area of the tubular or wellbore immediately below the sleeve member.




These and other features of the invention, preferred embodiments and variants thereof, and advantages will become appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the detailed description and drawings following below.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a jet cleaning tool connected to a coiled tubing;





FIG. 2

shows a jet cleaning tool in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention; and





FIG. 3

illustrates the improved efficiency of the novel nozzle arrangement over known arrangements.











MODE(S) FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




The invention is now described with reference to the attached drawings.




A typical well cleaning operation is illustrated by FIG.


1


. The subsurface equipment for well cleaning comprises a coiled tubing reel


11


usually mounted on a truck


12


. Connected to the reel there is a cleaning fluid tank


13


, a reservoir and feeder for the abrasive material


14


. A mixer


15


generates the abrasive slurry applied for deposit removal. A pump unit


16


generates the pressure to circulate the slurry through the coiled tubing


17


and the wellbore


18


.




The coiled tubing


17


is fed through the Blow-out Preventer (BOP) stack


181


into the well tubulars


182


. A return pipe


171


at the upper end of the well tubulars closes the flow loop through which the cleaning fluid is pumped. Also included in the flow loop (but not shown) are separators to recover the cleaning fluid and/or the abrasives.




In operation, the coiled tubing with a jetting head


172


at its end is lowered into the well


18


to a predetermined depth at which deposits


183


are to be removed. Then the abrasive containing slurry is discharged through the nozzles of the jetting head removing scale at a rate depending on the deposits, jetting speed and stand-off.




The basic components of a nozzle arrangement in accordance with the invention are illustrated in FIG.


2


. There is shown the lower part


20


of a hollow tube representing a drillstring or a coiled tubing. Attached to the tube is a sleeve member


22


. The sleeve member in the described example is made of a solid cylinder of engineering steel with a frustro-conically shaped upper end and an outer diameter of 75 mm and a centre bore


221


of 45 mm. An alternative material may be tungsten carbide or other steels of sufficient hardness.




Further components of the system are a nozzle head


24


which carries two axially separated nozzles


241


,


242


arranged with a 180 degrees angular separation. The nozzle head is rotatably mounted on the drillstring


20


. In operation the first nozzle


241


removes only part of the debris


261


, leaving material at a small angle with respect to the wall of the tubular


26


. The efficiency of the operation of the second nozzle


242


was found to be linked to this angle (target angle) with increased efficiency at smaller target angles. The second nozzle


242


is directed to the area


223


immediately below the sleeve.




To demonstrate the improved efficiency of the novel arrangements, tests were carried out cutting Stancliffe sandstone and cleaning scaled tubing. Axial separations between the nozzles


241


and


242


were 0, 6, and 20 mm at an angular separation of 180 degrees. Other test conditions were






















Nozzle diameter:




2.8




mm







Stand-off:




15




mm







Nozzle pressure drop:




130




B







Vessel pressure:




210




B














Jetting media (for Stancliffe):




water







Jetting media (for scale):




calcite pellets















Rotary speed:




80




rpm















The results of the test are shown in

FIG. 3

as material removed versus nozzle separation at various tool propagation speeds. A clear tendency for improved cutting efficiency at larger nozzle separation is demonstrated enabling operations at higher tool propagation speed for the same level of material removal.



Claims
  • 1. Fluid jet cleaning apparatus for cleaning of tubulars and boreholes for hydrocarbon reservoir exploration and production, said apparatus comprising:mounted on a part of a lower end of a hollow tubular, a nozzle head rotatable with respect to the lower end of the hollow tubular, the nozzle head including less than five axially and angularly separated nozzles, each nozzle being spaced apart from each other nozzle by a predetermined distance in a direction along the central axis of the hollow tubular and a predetermined angle as measured from the central axis.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the number of nozzles is two or three.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the axial separation between two nozzles is at least 0.5 times the nozzle diameter.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the nozzles are arranged clockwise or counterclockwise with an essentially uniform angular spacing.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the angular separation of the nozzles is 180 degrees for a pair of nozzles or 120 degrees for three nozzles.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the leading edge has openings allowing fluid to pass through the sleeve member.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a gauge defining sleeve member arranged such that a fluid jet discharged from one of the nozzles targets an area of the tubular or wellbore immediately below said sleeve member.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein sleeve member has an essentially annular edge of a width of less than 10 mm.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein sleeve member has an essentially annular edge of a width of less than 5 mm.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1 attached to a lower part of coiled tubing.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9804690 Mar 1998 GB
US Referenced Citations (56)
Number Name Date Kind
778903 Schussler Jan 1905 A
RE13032 Greenan Nov 1909 E
951202 Shrik Mar 1910 A
1274931 Otterson Aug 1918 A
1279333 Green Sep 1918 A
1344249 Stwart Jun 1920 A
1424109 Mbride Jul 1922 A
1498446 Gesky Jun 1924 A
1568392 Abernathy Jan 1926 A
1994209 Burns Mar 1935 A
2099723 Carver Nov 1937 A
2167194 Anderson Jul 1939 A
2239586 Appleby Apr 1941 A
3130786 Brown et al. Apr 1964 A
3310113 Maness Mar 1967 A
3348616 Zingg Oct 1967 A
3449783 Kirschke Jun 1969 A
3589388 Haneline, Jr. Jun 1971 A
3839875 Matsushita Oct 1974 A
3994310 Brandon Nov 1976 A
4037661 Ford Jul 1977 A
4071919 Fields Feb 1978 A
4157096 Miller, Jr. Jun 1979 A
4196050 Takahashi et al. Apr 1980 A
4197910 Hutchison Apr 1980 A
4271556 Farrell, Jr. Jun 1981 A
4299282 Thornton Nov 1981 A
4349073 Zublin Sep 1982 A
4441557 Zublin Apr 1984 A
4501322 Martin Feb 1985 A
4503811 Hammond Mar 1985 A
4518041 Zublin May 1985 A
4688637 Theis Aug 1987 A
4705107 Council et al. Nov 1987 A
4718728 Hodges Jan 1988 A
4763728 Lacey Aug 1988 A
4788732 Kollmar Dec 1988 A
4923021 Courmier et al. May 1990 A
5060725 Buell Oct 1991 A
5125425 Folts et al. Jun 1992 A
5174394 Fischer et al. Dec 1992 A
5230306 Barringer et al. Jul 1993 A
5305713 Vadakin Apr 1994 A
5323797 Rankin Jun 1994 A
5379476 Salecker Jan 1995 A
5399056 Shibazaki et al. Mar 1995 A
5444887 Rufolo Aug 1995 A
5463887 Vasseur Nov 1995 A
5737709 Getty et al. Apr 1998 A
5762083 Bate Jun 1998 A
5778831 Jameel Jul 1998 A
5855219 Spencer Jan 1999 A
5944123 Johnson Aug 1999 A
5996159 Irwin Dec 1999 A
6050337 Melegari Apr 2000 A
6217207 Streich et al. Apr 2001 B1