Fluid ejection dies may eject fluid drops via nozzles thereof. Nozzles may include fluid ejectors that may be actuated to thereby cause ejection of drops of fluid through nozzle orifices of the nozzles. Some example fluid ejection dies may be printheads, where the fluid ejected may correspond to ink.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and the size of some parts may be exaggerated to more clearly illustrate the example shown. Moreover the drawings provide examples and/or implementations consistent with the description; however, the description is not limited to the examples and/or implementations provided in the drawings.
Examples of fluid ejection devices may comprise at least one fluid ejection die. Example fluid ejection dies may comprise a plurality of ejection nozzles that may be arranged in a set, where such plurality of nozzles may be referred to as a set of nozzles. In some examples, each nozzle may comprise a fluid chamber, a nozzle orifice, and a fluid ejector. A fluid ejector may include a piezoelectric membrane based actuator, a thermal resistor based actuator (which may be referred to as a thermal fluid ejector), an electrostatic membrane actuator, a mechanical/impact driven membrane actuator, a magneto-strictive drive actuator, or other such elements that may cause displacement of fluid responsive to electrical actuation. Furthermore, example fluid ejection dies may comprise at least one temperature sensor disposed thereon. In some examples, a fluid ejection die may comprise at least one temperature sensor for each set of nozzles. In some examples, a fluid ejection die may comprise at least one temperature sensor for each nozzle.
In such examples, for a respective nozzle, an actuation signal may be transmitted to the respective nozzle to cause actuation of a fluid ejector disposed in the respective nozzle. Due to actuation of the fluid ejector, the nozzle may eject a drop of fluid. As used herein, an ejection event may refer to the actuation and subsequent ejection of at least one fluid drop from at least one nozzle. Moreover, it may be noted that in some examples, a plurality of nozzles may be actuated concurrently such that a plurality of fluid drops may be ejected concurrently. Accordingly, in these examples, an ejection event refers to the concurrent actuation and ejection of fluid drops from a plurality of respective nozzles.
In some example fluid ejection systems, as fluid is ejected via nozzles, a temperature change may occur. For example, if fluid ejectors of the nozzles correspond to thermal fluid ejectors, a temperature of a fluid ejection die may increase responsive to actuation of the thermal fluid ejector. In addition, when fluid drops are ejected from the nozzle, a temperature decrease/cooling effect may occur. Accordingly, an ejection event for a fluid ejection die may facilitate a temperature change of the fluid ejection die. In addition, a volume of fluid ejected for a particular nozzle (i.e., a size of a fluid drop) may correspond to the cooling effect achieved by the ejection action. Therefore, due to the actuation of the fluid ejector and/or the ejection of a fluid drop, a temperature associated with the nozzle may change in an expected manner. Furthermore, a temperature change may further include a rate of change of the temperature of a nozzle or a set of nozzles over time. In other examples, a temperature change may include a rate of change of the temperature of a nozzle or a set of nozzles over a number of ejection events.
Example fluid ejection devices may include a control engine, where the control engine may monitor temperatures of the nozzles of the fluid ejection die during operation of the fluid ejection die. Based on the temperature of the nozzles associated with ejection events, the control engine may determine nozzle characteristics for nozzles of the fluid ejection die. In some examples, a nozzle characteristic that may be determined may include an operational status of at least one respective nozzle, where an operational status may include whether a nozzle is operative or non-operative. In some examples, a nozzle characteristic that may be determined may include a volume of fluid ejected for fluid drops of at least one ejection event. In some examples, a nozzle characteristic that may be determined may include whether at least one respective nozzle is at least partially blocked. These and other nozzle characteristics may be determined as described herein.
As shown herein, example fluid ejection devices may comprise engines, where such engines may be any combination of hardware and programming to implement the functionalities of the respective engines. In some examples described herein, the combinations of hardware and programming may be implemented in a number of different ways. For example, the programming for the engines may be processor executable instructions stored on a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium and the hardware for the engines may include a processing resource to process and execute those instructions.
In some examples, a fluid ejection device implementing such engines may include the machine-readable storage medium storing the instructions and the processing resource to process the instructions, or the machine-readable storage medium may be separately stored and accessible by the system and the processing resource. In some examples, engines may be implemented in circuitry. Moreover, processing resources used to implement engines may comprise a processing unit (CPU), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a specialized controller, and/or other such types of logical components that may be implemented for data processing.
Some examples contemplated herein may compare temperatures and/or temperature changes associated with nozzles of a fluid ejection die to an expected temperature or an expected range of temperatures. In such examples, at least one nozzle characteristic of at least one respective nozzle may be determined based at least in part on whether temperature and/or temperature changes associated with the at least one nozzle are within an expected range. An expected temperature or an expected temperature range may be predefined, or such expected temperature or expected temperature range may be determined by the device during performance of operations by the device.
For example, temperatures of a nozzle may be monitored during ejection of fluid drops with the nozzle for a set of 10 ejection events. Based on previous performances of the set of 10 ejection events, examples may have an expected range of temperature changes that occur for nozzles when performing the 10 ejection events. In other examples, an example fluid ejection device may have an expected temperature change range for a given duration when performing ejection events, such as one minute. In such examples, the fluid ejection device may compare a measured temperature change over one minute to the expected temperature change range. In some examples, the fluid ejection device may determine nozzle characteristics based at least in part on a rate of change of a temperature associated with a nozzle. In such examples, an expected rate of change of a temperature associated with a nozzle may be compared to a determined rate of change for the nozzle during one ejection event or a set of ejection events when determining nozzle characteristics. These and other similar examples are contemplated herein.
Turning now to the figures, and particularly to
The control engine 66 may monitor temperatures associated nozzles 56 with the temperature sensors 60 thereof. Based at least in part on the temperatures associated with the nozzles of the fluid ejection dies 54 associated with at least one ejection event, a temperature change associated with nozzles 56 actuated for the at least one ejection event may be determined. Based on such temperature changes, nozzle characteristics of at least one respective nozzle 56 may be determined.
In the example of
Turning now to
For example, if a particular nozzle is actuated (i.e., the fluid ejector of the nozzle is electrically actuated) for a set of ejection events, an example fluid ejection device may monitor the temperature change of at least one temperature sensor disposed proximate the nozzle due to the actuation. As discussed previously, the temperature associated with the nozzle may increase due to actuation of the nozzle for ejection, and the temperature associated with the nozzle may decrease due to fluid drop ejection. Accordingly, over the set of ejection events for which the nozzle is actuated, a temperature change may occur. Based on the temperature change for the nozzle, the fluid ejection device may determine whether the nozzle is operative (e.g., ejecting fluid drops), whether the nozzle is partially or fully blocked, an average drop volume of the fluid drops ejected for the set of ejection events, and/or other such nozzle characteristics.
In this example, it may be appreciated that a plurality of nozzles may be actuated concurrently for one ejection event or a set of ejection events. Accordingly, in this example, the fluid ejection system may determine that some nozzles of the plurality ejected are non-operative without determining the specific nozzles. In other similar examples, the fluid ejection device may determine the operational status of specific nozzles by analyzing temperature changes associated with the nozzles for a set of ejection events in which different combinations of nozzles are ejected concurrently. In other examples, the fluid ejection device may determine the operational status of each nozzle based on a respective temperature change associated with the respective nozzle.
Turning now to
Accordingly, examples provided herein may provide a fluid ejection device in which nozzle characteristics of nozzles of fluid ejection dies thereof may be monitored and determined based at least in part on measured temperatures associated with the nozzles. Moreover, examples described herein may monitor temperature changes for nozzles associated with ejection events. By monitoring temperature and temperature change with temperature sensors proximate nozzles, examples may determine characteristics and conditions of the nozzles.
The preceding description has been presented to illustrate and describe examples of the principles described. This description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit these principles to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the description. In addition, while various examples are described herein, elements and/or combinations of elements may be combined and/or removed for various examples contemplated hereby. For example, the example operations provided herein in the flowcharts of
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/026297 | 4/6/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/186862 | 10/11/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4860027 | Ozelis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4896172 | Nozawa et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
6231167 | Tsuboi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6322189 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6460964 | Osborne | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6634731 | Kao | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6827416 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866359 | Pan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7125110 | Merz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7490919 | Combs | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7699425 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8091993 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8226188 | Nishimura | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8474937 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506063 | Limb et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8628160 | Takano et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9475304 | Sugitani et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20010012031 | Miyake et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020113852 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030202073 | Dowell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20070291066 | Takabayashi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291069 | Shihoh et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080055378 | Drury et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090021542 | Kanfoush et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090115814 | Combs et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100214378 | Katoh et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130194335 | Nodsu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140240386 | Hagiwara et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140300657 | Ike | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150343763 | Zhang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160159089 | Kaneko | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160214378 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0482850 | Apr 1992 | EP |
S61266250 | Nov 1986 | JP |
H02162054 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2207958 | Jul 2003 | RU |
2007114584 | Oct 2008 | RU |
2015080709 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cibis, et al. Influencing Parameters in Droplet Formation for DoD Printing of Conductive Inks. Apr. 21-24, 2008. Institute of Automation Technology. Hamburg, Germany. |
Kwon, et al. Inkjet jet failures and their detection using piezo self sensing. Sensors and Actuators A 201, ScienceDirect, 2013, pp. 335-341. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200114646 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |