This application claims priority from Taiwanese invention patent application no. 109105159, filed on Feb. 18, 2020.
The disclosure relates to a nozzle device, more particularly to a nozzle device for subjecting a workpiece to an electrochemical process.
A jet electroplating process has become widely used in recent years since such process may be rapidly implemented on a selected region (such as a worn or damaged region, a blind hole, a high aspect ratio hole) of a workpiece. As shown in
Therefore, an object of the disclosure is to provide a nozzle device for subjecting a workpiece to an electrochemical process, which is useful in improving plating or etching efficiency and uniformity.
According to the disclosure, a nozzle device is provided for subjecting a workpiece to an electrochemical process. The workpiece has a first electrode. The nozzle device includes a nozzle body and at least one second electrode. The nozzle body extends along a longitudinal axis to terminate at a top surface and a bottom surface for confronting the first electrode of the workpiece. The nozzle body has a recess provided in the bottom surface, and a longitudinal channel extending downwardly from the top surface along the longitudinal axis to be in fluid communication with the recess. The longitudinal channel has an upper section and a lower tapered section which is tapered downwardly to form a lower communication port. The second electrode is disposed in the recess for being spaced apart from the first electrode.
Because the recess is provided in the bottom surface of the nozzle body and because the second electrode is provided in the recess, an electrolytic solution may have a more even electric field distribution between the first and second electrodes, and a selected region on the workpiece may be evenly plated or etched.
Other features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent in the following detailed description of the embodiment(s) with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Before the disclosure is described in greater detail, it should be noted that where considered appropriate, reference numerals have been repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements, which may optionally have similar characteristics.
To aid in describing the disclosure, directional terms may be used in the specification and claims to describe portions of the present disclosure (e.g., front, rear, left, right, top, bottom, etc.). These directional definitions are intended to merely assist in describing and claiming the disclosure and are not intended to limit the disclosure in any way.
Referring to
The nozzle body 2 extends along a longitudinal axis (L) to terminate at a top surface 22 and a bottom surface 21 for confronting the first electrode 11 of the workpiece 1. The nozzle body 2 has an outer peripheral surface 23 interconnecting the top and bottom surfaces 22, 21, a recess 24 provided in the bottom surface 21, and a longitudinal channel 25 extending downwardly from the top surface 22 along the longitudinal axis (L) to be in fluid communication with the recess 24. The longitudinal channel 25 has an upper section 251 and a lower tapered section 252 which is tapered downwardly to form a lower communication port 253. In an embodiment shown in
In an embodiment shown in
In an embodiment shown in
The at least one second electrode 3 is disposed in the recess 24 for being spaced apart from the first electrode 11.
In an embodiment shown in
In an embodiment shown in
In an embodiment shown in
In an embodiment shown in
The embodiments of the disclosure will now be explained in more detail below by way of the following experiments. Those experiments are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
Simulation Model
Flow Velocity Simulation
COMSOL Multiphysics software was used to simulate flows of the electrolytic solution in four simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3). In each of the simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3), a half of the port width (A/2) was set to be 1 mm, a half of the recess width (B/2) was set to be 10 mm, the channel depth (D) was set to be 2 mm, the height (E) was set to be 20 mm, the width (F/2) was set to be 12 mm, the temperature was set to be 298 k, and an inflow rate (flow rate at the inlet of the simulation model) was set to be 250 l/h. The recess depths (C) in the simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3) were set to be 0 mm, 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Horizontal flow rates of the electrolytic solution at the line (y=0.2 mm) for each of the simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, E3) were extracted from the simulation results and shown in
Flow Pressure Simulation
The COMSOL Multiphysics software was used to simulate the flow pressures of the electrolytic solution in the four simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3). The parameters for the four simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3) were the same as those used in the flow velocity simulations. Flow pressures of the electrolytic solution at the line (y=0.2 mm) for each of the simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, E3) were extracted from the simulation results and shown in
From the results shown in
First Plating Simulation
In the first plating simulation, the COMSOL Multiphysics software was used to simulate growth of metal layers on the first electrodes 11 in the four simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3). In addition to the parameters used in the above simulations, a bulk concentration of Cu ions was set to be 0.5 mol/l and an anode voltage was set to be 0.135 V. In addition, in the simulation model (CE1), the second electrodes were set to be mounted on an inner peripheral surface of the upper section 251 shown in
Simulated plated thicknesses at different plating times (0 second, 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds, 4 seconds, and 5 seconds) for the simulation models (CE1, E1, E2, and E3) were respectively shown in
In the simulation model (CE1), as shown in
In the simulation models (E1 to E3), as shown in
Electroplating Experiment
Three nozzle devices (CE 1, E2, and E3) were formed based on the three simulation models (CE1, E2, and E3), respectively. Three electroplating tests (CE 1, E2, and E3) were performed using the three nozzle devices (CE 1, E2, and E3), respectively. In each test, the temperature was set at 298 k, the electrolytic solution included an aqueous solution of copper(II) sulfate (CuSO4.5H2O, 250 g/l) and a sulfuric acid aqueous solution (0.5 M) in a volume ratio of 1:1 (a bulk concentration of Cu ions was 0.5 mol/l), an inflow rate of the electrolytic solution was set to be 250 l/h, and an average cathode current density was 5 A/dm2. The SEM images of copper layers plated on the first electrodes in the three tests (CE1, E2, and E3) were shown in
Second Plating Simulation
The second plating simulation was performed similarly to the first plating simulation except that inert particles (10 g/L) were added in the electrolytic solution. In this simulation, the inert particles were diamond particles having a particle density of 35 10 kg/m3, particle diameter of 4×10−6 m, and a charge number of 0. In addition, the plating time was set to be 5 seconds. Simulated results were shown in
In sum, with the provision of the recess 24 in the nozzle device 10, and with the provision of the second electrode 3 in the recess 24, the variation in the horizontal flow rate and the flow pressure in proximity to the first electrode 11 may be reduced and the first electrode 11 to be plated or etched may be subjected to a reduced shear stress. Therefore, a metal plated layer may have a dense structure and more uniform thickness in comparison with the layer plated using a nozzle device without the recess 24. In addition, with the provision of the recess 24, a relatively large area on the first electrode 11 may be plated or etched using the nozzle device 10 of the disclosure.
Furthermore, the nozzle device 10 of the disclosure is also useful in increasing the proportion of inert particles in the metal layer. The inert particles may be provided for increasing the hardness, wear-resistance, and etch-resistance of the metal layer. Although the diamond particles were used in the above simulation, particles of Al2O3, SiC, and CeO2 may also be used.
In the description above, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details have been set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiment(s). It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that one or more other embodiments may be practiced without some of these specific details. It should also be appreciated that reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” an embodiment with an indication of an ordinal number and so forth means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic may be included in the practice of the disclosure. It should be further appreciated that in the description, various features are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure and aiding in the understanding of various inventive aspects, and that one or more features or specific details from one embodiment may be practiced together with one or more features or specific details from another embodiment, where appropriate, in the practice of the disclosure.
While the disclosure has been described in connection with what is (are) considered the exemplary embodiment(s), it is understood that this disclosure is not limited to the disclosed embodiment(s) but is intended to cover various arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent arrangements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
109105159 | Feb 2020 | TW | national |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
109794659 | May 2019 | CN |
9-27312 | Jan 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210254234 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |