This invention relates generally to tools for removing coke from containers such as coking drums used in oil refining, and more particularly to improvements in cutting and drilling nozzle designs for use in a decoking tool.
In conventional petroleum refining operations, crude oil is processed into gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, lubricants or the like. It is a common practice to recover heavy residual hydrocarbon byproducts through a thermal cracking process known as delayed coking. In a delayed coker operation, heavy hydrocarbon (oil) is heated to a high temperature (for example, between 900° F. and 1000° F.) in large fired heaters known as a fractionation unit, and then transferred to cylindrical vessels known as coke drums which are as large as 30 feet in diameter and 140 feet in height, and typically configured to operate in pairs. The heated oil releases its hydrocarbon vapors (including, among other things, gas, naphtha and gas oils) to the base of the fractionation unit for processing into useful products, leaving behind, through the combined effect of temperature and retention time, solid petroleum coke. This coke residue must be broken up in order to remove it from the vessel, and is preferably accomplished by using a decoking (or coke cutting) tool in conjunction with a decoking fluid, such as high pressure water.
Such a tool includes a drill bit with both drilling and cutting nozzles. The tool is lowered into the vessel through an opening in the top of the vessel, and the high pressure water supply is introduced into the tool so that it can be selectively routed through either the drilling or cutting nozzles of the bit to act as a fluid jet, depending on the mode of operation. Since high flow rates and pressures (for example, flows of 1000 gallons per minute (gpm) at 3000 to 4000 pounds per square inch (psi)) are typically used for such operations, it is neither practical nor desirable to open drilling and cutting nozzles at the same time. Instead, it has been advantageous to employ diverter valves or other flow control devices to selectively direct the flow to either the cutting nozzles or the drilling nozzles, depending on which part of the decoking operation the tool is in at that time. A couple of examples of decoking tools employing mode-shifting attributes are depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 5,816,505 (for manual mode shifting) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,567 (for automated mode shifting); both are commonly owned by the Assignee of the present invention, and also incorporated herein by reference.
Regardless of whether a decoking tool uses mode-shifting features, the relatively large size of the tool, coupled with the generally outward-pointing cutting nozzles, means that it must form a significant radial profile in the bed of coke being cut. A conventional tool is approximately 22 inches in diameter and 35 inches long, while the nozzle assembly dimensions are slightly over 5 inches in length with an outer diameter at the inlet of about 3.75 inches and an outer diameter at the exit of about 1.875 inches. This large size exacerbates the tendency of the tool to get stuck, especially in situations where the bored-out passageway formed in the coke may already be compromised, such as when the coke bed collapses or gets stuck with coke pieces that have been liberated by the force of the decoking fluid emanating from the cutting nozzles. Under such a situation, the tool could get stuck, requiring difficult and time consuming steps to free it.
In addition to large physical dimensions, conventional cutting and drilling nozzles tend to exhibit a larger-than-necessary pressure drop. Much of this stems from an unnecessarily large radial profile caused in the plane of ejection of the decoking fluid at the nozzle tip. The conventional nozzle was relatively long in order to accommodate the large number of drilled flow passages, while the large radial dimension reflects the need for numerous such passages. In addition, various components making up the nozzle are formed as an assembly made up of multiple pieces that may necessitate complex machining and related manufacturing.
It is desirable to create nozzles for a decoking tool that avoid one or more of the shortcomings mentioned above.
These desires are met by the present invention, where decoking fluid nozzles are provided with enhanced flow attributes. The surfaces of the internal flowpaths define a generally tapered or converging shape that can reduce the radial components of the flow velocity, and in a likewise manner can reduce the standard deviation of the axial component of the decoking fluid flow. Because the standard deviation in axial velocity is representative of any deviation from the mean value, the present inventors have determined that optimizing the nozzle shape (such as by running an optimization routine) forces this parameter to be minimum, and that this results in a nozzle that produces a jet where the flow velocity across a cross section is as close to the mean as possible, and that such a uniform jet is most effective in cutting coke in the decoking process. By such improvements in flowpath tailoring, the size (in particular, the axial length) of the nozzle can be reduced, while still providing the necessary jet impact force and jet coherence. Such size reduction (as well as part number reduction) improves manufacturability and operability.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a nozzle assembly for use in a fluid jet decoking tool is disclosed. The assembly includes a housing with conduit formed therein that is sufficient to convey decoking fluid (such as pressurized water) to one or more nozzles that are fluidly coupled to the conduit. The nozzle includes a fluid inlet, a fluid outlet and an internal flowpath extending from the inlet to the outlet. The flowpath defines a tapered shape such that when the decoking fluid passes through the nozzle, a flow pattern formed thereby is predominantly coherent. Such coherence is achieved by prevention of stagnant areas and large eddy flows. The wall boundary layer is also minimized to reduce turbulence losses.
Optionally, there are numerous nozzles formed in the housing. Such nozzles may include one or more cutting nozzles and one or more drilling nozzles. In a preferred form, a substantial majority of the nozzle does not protrude laterally beyond an outer dimension defined by the housing. In other words, the presence of the nozzles in the assembly does not appreciably widen or lengthen the assembly's housing. While a precise demarcation of what it means to have the nozzles not appreciably extend the footprint and related dimensions of the housing is not discussed, certain ranges can be used to serve as an example. For example, in nozzles used in a conventional decoking tool (such as those shown and discussed below in conjunction with the prior art), the drilling nozzles may extend the overall assembly length dimension by up to 40% or more, while the cutting nozzles may extend the overall radial or width dimension by up to 60% or more. Such dimensions are considerably larger than the 0% to approximately 10% that the nozzles of the present invention can increase housing footprints.
Relatedly, a majority of the structure making up the nozzle (including the structure that gives definition to the inlet, outlet and intermediate flowpath formed between the inlet and outlet) fits within (or almost entirely within) the existing housing structure. As such, it is substantially enclosed within the housing. This is particularly applicable to the cutting nozzles, where only the edge adjacent the nozzle outlet is outside of the housing. As with the discussion above of how much the nozzle extends the dimensions of the assembly housing, a precise demarcation of what it means to have a portion of the nozzle or nozzles extend beyond that of the housing is not discussed. Nevertheless (as above), certain ranges can be used to serve as an example. In nozzles used in a conventional decoking tool (such as those shown and discussed below in conjunction with the prior art), both the drilling and cutting nozzles may have 60% or more of the nozzle structure extend outside of the housing, whereas in the nozzles of the present invention, no more than about 15% of the length of the cutting nozzles and no more than about 25% of the length of the drilling nozzles resides outside the housing.
In additional options, the nozzle can be substantially fixed relative to the housing such that it doesn't pivot or otherwise move, thereby promoting a constant cutting angle for the cutting nozzles and a relatively fixed drilling angle for the drilling nozzles. In another optional features, the nozzles may include a flow conditioning chamber formed immediately upstream of the fluid inlet. This chamber mitigates any pre-swirl that arises as a result of the fluid motion through the tool body. Pre-swirl is an undesired phenomenon, as it contributes to the radial velocity component as the jet exits the nozzle. The internal flowpath is preferably optimized to achieve the highest degree of nozzle performance indicia, preferably at least one of (a) minimal radial velocity, (b) minimal axial flow non-uniformity and (c) minimal axial length for the nozzle. In the present context, the term “optimizing” and its variants is meant to specifically include those flowpath configurations that have been run through at least one computational fluid dynamics (CFD) computation to determine which flowpath profile would produce the best (or optimum) of one or more of the nozzle performance indicia identified above. In one form, the CFD process can be used to achieve flowpath optimization. For example, two nozzle profiles can be used, where one produces a linear velocity gradient along the length of the nozzle, and another produces a linear pressure gradient along the length of the nozzle. These could be represented mathematically using Bezier curves and used as starting points for the optimization process. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other mathematical representation besides Bezier curves can serve the purpose. By varying the parameters that define the curve, multiple simulation runs can be carried out to identify the optimal region that satisfied the three performance criteria stated above.
According to another aspect of the invention, a fluid jet decoking tool is disclosed. The tool includes a decoking fluid delivery mechanism that can receive a pressurized decoking fluid from a source, and a nozzle assembly that can be placed in fluid communication with the source through the mechanism. In one form, the decoking fluid delivery mechanism is in the form of a delivery tube, pipe, hose or related conduit. The assembly includes a housing with one or more decoking fluid conduit lines formed therein, as well as one or more of each cutting nozzles and drilling nozzles. The housing may form a separate structure that can be secured to a decoking tool body (such as through fastening, friction fit or other suitable means), or it can be a part of the tool body, such as through integral formation or the like. In either situation, it is likely that the maximum lateral (or radial) dimension of the portion of the decoking tool that traverses a decoking vessel will be defined by the assembly's housing will (along with the nozzles). Each of the drilling and cutting nozzles can be placed in selective fluid communication with the conduit in the tool body. A valve or related flow diverting mechanism is disposed in flowpaths formed between the nozzles and the conduit in the tool body to permit selective routing of the decoking fluid through the housing such that during a particular one of the cutting and drilling operations, the nozzle or nozzles not then in use are substantially fluidly decoupled from the source. Furthermore, the nozzles may include an internal flowpath defining a tapered shape such that upon passage of the decoking fluid through the nozzle, a flow pattern formed by the decoking fluid as it exits the nozzle exhibits a predominantly coherent pattern.
In a more particular form of the decoking tool, the valves are operated upon by the mode shifting apparatus that routes the decoking fluid to one or the other of the drilling and cutting nozzles. In another option, the one or more nozzles are placed within the decoking tool body so that a majority of the structure making up the nozzle fits within a footprint formed by the tool body. This allows at least the radially-outward projection of the tool due to the nozzles to be reduced. As before, the construction of the assembly can be made to ensure that most of the nozzle's profile is contained within the tool body so that the nozzle outlet is either entirely or almost entirely within the outer dimension defined by the tool. In another option, a substantial majority of the at least one cutting nozzle does not protrude laterally beyond an outer dimension defined by the decoking tool body. More particularly, such a substantial majority may be a substantial entirety. The assembly may also be structured so that one or more of the nozzles are substantially fixed relative to the tool body, while a particular form of the nozzle is such that it includes a flow conditioning chamber formed immediately upstream of the fluid inlet and in fluid communication with the conduit. As with the previous aspect, the internal flowpath is preferably optimized to achieve one or more of (a) minimal radial velocity, (b) minimal axial flow non-uniformity and (c) minimal axial length for the nozzle.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method of passing a decoking fluid through a nozzle is disclosed. The method includes configuring one or more nozzles to allow decoking fluid to pass through, where the nozzle or nozzles include an internal flowpath that defines a tapered shape. In addition, the method includes providing the decoking fluid to the nozzle or nozzles such that a flow pattern formed by the decoking fluid as it passes through is predominantly coherent.
Optionally, the method further includes passing the decoking fluid through at least one drilling nozzle and at least one cutting nozzle. The method may additionally include selectively routing the decoking fluid through one or the other of the cutting and drilling nozzles at any given time. Such selective routing can be achieved by using a mode shifting apparatus in general, and in more particular, with an automated mode shifting apparatus that uses changes in decoking fluid pressure to shift between cutting and drilling modes. In a particular form, the method includes running one or more CFD calculations to help design the nozzle, where a particular emphasis is on designing the nozzle flowpath in accordance with the output generated by the CFD calculation. The output generated that is particularly beneficial to designing a nozzle according to the present invention includes that associated with one or more of (a) minimal radial velocity, (b) minimal axial flow non-uniformity and (c) shortest axial length of the nozzle as possible. In one other option, the flow conditioning chamber can be included to reduce or eliminate any pre-swirl that may have arisen as a result of the fluid motion through the tool body.
The following detailed description of the present invention can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Referring first to
Referring with particularity to
Referring next to
Referring with particularity to
By reducing the pressure drop associated with a conventional nozzle, nozzles 110, 111 made according to the present invention provide a shorter axial dimension and related smaller footprint for nozzle assembly 100, allowing the nozzle to fit within tight confines. For example, during situations where a collapsed bed occurs, the new smaller nozzle assembly 100 is primarily recessed back into the assembly 100 resulting in a more streamlined shape that can often be directly pulled out of a collapsed bed. In addition, such a configuration can save energy and potentially allow the use of a smaller pump and motor, as the same fluid volume and velocity at the exit of nozzles 110, 111 can be achieved with less pumping. Furthermore, the new nozzle assembly 100 consists of two smaller pieces with simpler and less costly manufacturing.
CFD and related flow simulation algorithms, as well as bench testing can be used to provide preferred decoking fluid flowpath shapes. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that an underlying CFD package may be developed specifically for the present application, or an off-the-shelf commercial code can be used to perform the CFD analyses discussed herein. CFD modelling can be used to demonstrate particular flow attributes, such as coherent flow, laminar or turbulent flow, locations where separated flow can be expected, or the like. In particular, CFD can be used to model particular nozzle internal profiles (i.e., flowpaths), such as the unique profile associated with the nozzles of the present invention. Such computational methods can take into consideration particular hydraulic attributes of the decoking fluid. Iterative approaches may also be employed to study the effects of flow perturbation and internal flowpath shape optimization. Such iterations could be based on simple starting geometries (such as tubular members, simple cones and other easily-defined configurations) that could then be modified to produce desirable flow attributes (such as a linear pressure drop along the flow axis). The optimization parameters may include minimizing the radial inflow at the exit throat of the nozzle and the standard deviation of the axial flow velocity (achieving thereby uniform flow across the exit throat). An additional benefit is that the resulting geometry can use well known similarity laws to allow scaling, depending on the size needs of the assembly 100. Hence, nozzles can be made for a variety of flows and pressures within the limits proscribed by fully developed turbulent flow the importance of which is that it allows for the linear conversion of kinetic and pressure energy, thereby making it easier to ensure accurate prediction of scaled designs.
While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of co-pending (and now allowed) U.S. application Ser. No. 12/772,577, filed May 3, 2010, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/175,260, filed May 4, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2217360 | Frederick | Oct 1940 | A |
2218130 | Frederick | Oct 1940 | A |
2225521 | Holveck | Dec 1940 | A |
3137354 | Crawford et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3612409 | Henning | Oct 1971 | A |
3921915 | Glenn et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3968931 | Smith | Jul 1976 | A |
4275842 | Purton et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
5816505 | Tran et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6644567 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7163165 | Paul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7819343 | Paul et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
10077403 | Pattom | Sep 2018 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03014261 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180355253 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61175260 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12772577 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 16106906 | US |