The embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to safely storing radioactive debris, such as corium, nuclear fuel rod assemblies, and parts thereof, etc.
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (IF) Unit I to 3 in Japan, owned and operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), suffered tremendous damage from the East Japan Great Earthquake that occurred on Mar. 11, 2011. It is assumed that nuclear fuels in the 1F reactors experienced melting and, as a result, dropped to the bottom of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) and/or Pressure Containment Vessel (PCV), solidifying there as fuel debris after being fused with reactor internals, concrete structures, and other materials.
In order to pursue decommissioning of 1F, it is necessary to remove the fuel debris from the RPV/PCV using appropriate and safe Packaging, Transfer and Storage (PTS) procedures. Fuel debris retrieval procedures are expected to be started within 10 years' time and completed in 20 to 25 years' time. It is planned that after 30-40 years the fuel debris will all be placed in interim storage.
Embodiments of containers and methods are provided for safely removing and storing radioactive debris.
One embodiment, among others, is the container containing radioactive debris. The container comprises an overpack having an elongated cylindrical body extending between a top end and a bottom end, a planar bottom part at the bottom end, and a circular planar lid at the top end. The container further includes a basket situated inside of the overpack, and a plurality of elongated cylindrical canisters that are maintained in parallel along their lengths by the basket. Each of the canisters has an elongated cylindrical body extending between a top end and a bottom end, a planar bottom part situated at the bottom end, and a circular planar lid situated at the top end.
Furthermore, an elongated perforated columnizing insert is situated inside of at least one of the canisters. The insert has a plurality of elongated cylindrical tubes that are parallel along their lengths inside of the at least one canister. Each of the tubes has a side wall extending between a top end and a bottom end and has a plurality of perforations. Screening is associated with the side wall of each tube to delimit the perforations. A plurality of columns of the radioactive debris is situated in and is essentially created by respective tubes of the insert. The columns of the radioactive debris contain an amount of uranium dioxide (UO2) fuel. The perforations and the screening, in combination, enable gas flow through the side wall to enable evaporation of liquid from the radioactive debris, while adequately confining the columns of debris within the tubes.
Another embodiment, among others, is a canister containing radioactive debris. The canister comprises an elongated cylindrical body extending between a top end and a bottom end, a planar bottom part situated at the bottom end, and a circular planar lid situated at the top end.
An elongated columnizing insert is situated inside of the body of the canister. The insert has an elongated cylindrical body extending between a top end and a bottom end. The insert has a plurality of elongated cylindrical tubes that are parallel along their lengths inside of the canister. Each of the tubes has a side wall extending between a top end and a bottom end. The side wall has a plurality of perforations. Screening is associated with the side wall of each tube to delimit the perforations. A plurality of columns of the radioactive debris is situated in and is essentially created by respective tubes of the insert. The columns of the radioactive debris containing an amount of UO2 fuel. The perforations and the screening, in combination, enable gas flow through the side wall to enable evaporation of liquid from the radioactive debris, while adequately containing the columns of debris within the tubes.
Yet another embodiment, among others, is a perforated columnizing insert containing radioactive debris and that is designed for insertion into a canister. The insert comprises an elongated cylindrical body extending between a top end and a bottom end. The insert has a plurality of elongated cylindrical tubes that are parallel along their lengths inside of the canister. Each of the tubes has a side wall extending between a top end and a bottom end. The side wall has a plurality of perforations. Screening is associated with the side wall of each tube to delimit the perforations. A plurality of columns of the radioactive debris is situated in and is essentially created by respective tubes of the insert. The columns of the radioactive debris contain an amount of UO2 fuel. The perforations and the screening, in combination, enable gas flow through the side wall to enable evaporation of liquid from the radioactive debris, while adequately containing the columns of debris within the tubes.
Other apparatus, methods, apparatus, features, and advantages of the present invention will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
In order to establish PTS systems for IF fuel debris, procedures need to be formulated based on the nuclear fuel debris conditions, regulatory requirements, and Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) and Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) internal conditions. This entails full consideration of criticality prevention when handling nuclear fuel materials, the prevention of hydrogen explosion, and the evaluation of all other relevant safety-related functions.
It is planned that fuel debris retrieval procedures will be implemented with the PCV filled with water, in order to shield against radiation and to prevent the dispersion of radioactive materials. To maintain sub-criticality during PTS procedures, IF fuel debris will be secured in canisters having a controlled internal diameter.
Once fuel debris has been packaged securely in a fuel debris canister, some water also may be contained within the canister. Hydrogen generation through radiolysis of the water therefore is possible. To prevent a hydrogen explosion when handling fuel debris canisters, the canister includes a mesh type filter to allow the release of any hydrogen so generated in the canister. It is considered possible that nuclear fissile materials from fuel debris may be released along with the hydrogen from this filter. The fuel debris canister with filter must be designed to maintain sub-criticality (e.g., in a wet pool environment) even if nuclear fissile materials are released from the canister. The deployment of equipment to take away hydrogen and nuclear fissile materials released from the canisters also is a possibility.
The following is an overview of the debris packaging and subsequent management of the loaded debris canisters.
1. Canister Loading
The loading of fuel debris into the canisters will be performed adjacent to the reactor pressure vessel. After filling, a lid will be placed on the canister (not bolted) and then it will be transferred through the existing water channel to the reactor spent fuel pool. Neutron monitors located adjacent to the canister loading station will be available, if necessary, to infer reactivity of the canister during loading, to ensure that loading of debris does not violate the specified margin to criticality. Also, a portable weighing platform should be available, so that loading of debris can be halted if the specified weight limit otherwise would be violated.
Filled canisters will be received in the reactor spent fuel pool and located in racks that will hold five canisters. These racks will be the baskets to be used inside a metal overpack, which later will be loaded first into a transfer cask, even later potentially into a transport cask and, ultimately, into a ventilated concrete dry storage cask for long-term interim storage.
At this point, the debris inside the canister will be fully immersed in water and hydrolysis will result in the generation of hydrogen. The canisters will include a ventilation pipe to allow the release of such hydrogen, and this will enable the connection of the canister to an external hydrogen/off-gas processing and collection equipment. There should be sufficient floor space to locate such equipment adjacent to the reactor spent fuel pool and its primary functions will be as follows: (a) gases and moisture vapor from the canisters first will enter a Cyclone Moisture Separator; (b) the remaining gases will be directed to a Duplex Filter Monitoring Assembly (DFMA); (c) the filtered gases will be collected in a Gas Collection Header (GCH); and (d) collected gases will be discharged to a Plant Ventilation System (PVS).
The debris canister will include a second penetration line for use in draining and/or purging the canister. During this initial period of storage this second line will enable a purge with helium gas should the hydrogen generation, for any reason, increase beyond the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) concentration. Each line from the canisters will be monitored in order to provide an alert to any unacceptable operating conditions.
2. Reactor Spent Fuel Pool: Draining and Drying of the Debris Canisters
As and when it is deemed appropriate, each basket holding five debris canisters will be transferred to another location in the reactor spent fuel pool (the canister processing station) where the group of five canisters will be connected to an external canister processing system. This will drain the water out of each canister and then will purge each canister with helium at approximately 150° Celsius, in order to drive out almost all of the moisture. Once this has been achieved, if necessary the basket of five canisters can be returned to its original storage location in the pool, where it can be connected again to the external gas removal and processing system. It can remain there until such time as transfer to another storage location is implemented. In this relatively dry condition, the generation of hydrogen through hydrolysis will have been reduced substantially. Alternatively, the canisters can be immediately packaged in an over-pack and transfer cask to remove the debris canisters from the reactor spent fuel pool.
3. Transfer Out of the Reactor Spent Fuel Pool
Prior to transfer out of the reactor pool, the basket will be loaded into a metal overpack that itself already has been loaded into a transfer cask. At this point, the overpack will be fitted with a temporary shielding lid. Via penetrations in this temporary lid, the drain line on the canister will be closed off, and an external filter will be attached to the off-gas penetration line. The temporary lid will be replaced by a final closure lid, of either bolted or welded design, depending on the expected next stage in the management of the debris. If the intention is to make an on-site transfer to, for example, a common AFR (away from reactor) wet pool, then the closure lid would be bolted. If the intention is to transfer directly to AFR (off-site) interim dry storage, then the closure lid would be welded.
The welded closure would include a simple closure plate for the period of off-site transportation. Once at the storage location, this would be replaced by an external filter. The bolted closure could include just a simple cover plate if the canisters were to be taken out of the over-pack and stored again in a wet pool environment. Alternatively, if there was concern that a significant time interruption might occur during the transfer, it also could include an external filter.
The metal overpack will be drained and dried prior to moving on to the next phase of operations (wet pool or dry storage).
4. Key Features of the Debris Canister
Two canister variants are disclosed. The first is an open structure with no internal subdivision to facilitate loading with debris and ultimately an expected higher packing density compared with what would be achieved with a smaller diameter canister. The second includes a cruciform internal sub-divider, in case any substantively intact fuel assemblies are recovered from the reactor core; (the sub-divider will help to facilitate ease of loading for up to four such intact or partially intact fuel assembly pieces) and/or to deal with debris that may have a concentration of enriched uranium that is higher than the estimated average debris mixture, which may not be subcritical in the open canister design. It is noted that the open structure may utilize a perforated columnizing insert for extremely fine debris. Full details of the basis for the proposed canister size and how sub-criticality can be assured, are provide later in this document.
Prior to the canisters being drained, dried and packaged in an overpack, they will not include any sort of integral filter. During these phases of debris management, externally fitted filters will be utilized, exclusively, as and when appropriate.
The canisters may incorporate hydrogen absorption material or other hydrogen control device. Any such hydrogen getter would be evaluated for management of hydrogen release from the debris and incorporated as needed.
The quantities of various materials that will be contained in the mixed debris to be recovered and loaded into canisters has been estimated. For debris that may still be located inside the pressure vessel, this will tend to be mainly uranium mixed with some metallic structural materials (fuel cladding, BWR channel, BWR assembly components, possibly control rod blades and potentially some reactor structural materials). For debris that has penetrated the pressure vessel and fallen onto the base of the concrete containment, the mixture is expected to include concrete and some additional steel and other metals (from things like the pressure vessel, the lower core plate and the control rod drive mechanisms below the pressure vessel).
In order to perform the best calculations, it would be necessary to take samples from the core debris, which could be analyzed to provide accurate information about the typical composition, or range of compositions that might be expected. In the absence of such information, preliminary calculations have been performed based on an assumed mixture of UO2 with carbon steel in various plausible ratios, based on the approximate information presented in Table A.
The average enrichment of the uranium in the core at the time of the accident is assumed to have been 3.7 percent U235. This is the typical average assembly enrichment for fresh assemblies loaded into the core. Individual rods and pellets will have had initial enrichments up to 4.95 percent U235. In practice some of the fuel in the core will have experienced significant burnup, so the assumption of an average of 3.7 percent is considered to be a conservative assumption in respect of evaluating reactivity.
Initial criticality calculations have been performed assuming the extremely conservative assumption of a homogeneous mixture of uranium and other materials in various ratios. A Keff value of 0.95 is used as the maximum allowed reactivity at the +2a level. With UO2 content of 55 percent, under these conservative conditions, reactivity reaches a peak value just below the limit of Keff=0.95 when about 250 litres of debris has been loaded into the canister. As more debris is added, expelling water (moderator), reactivity then reduces slightly.
If, however, the portion of UO2 in the debris mix is increased to 60 percent, then the 0.95 limit is estimated to be exceeded when about 200 liters of debris has been loaded in the canister. This would not be acceptable, even if the reactivity coefficient would reduce as the canister was filled up more. Since the estimated portion of 55 percent UO2 is subject to large uncertainty, clearly this preliminary criticality assessment leaves corresponding uncertainty regarding the ability to fill up the canister with 1F debris.
In reality, however, the debris recovered and submitted for loading in the canisters is expected to be in the form of relatively large pieces of material that have been fused at high temperature. In other words, the debris/water mix in the canister will be highly heterogeneous. Accordingly, calculations have been performed assuming a heterogeneous mixture of debris and water, with pieces of debris in various physical forms. With these more realistic assumptions, it has been calculated that the canister can be fully loaded with UO2 and other material in any ratio from about 55:45 to about 70:30 and Keff reaches no more than about 0.5, far below the 0.95 limiting value.
It is recognized however that debris with an enriched uranium concentration higher than the average for all debris could be recovered and submitted for loading into an individual canister. In the limit there could be hot-spots of entirely enriched uranium material. For pure enriched uranium, the maximum amount that could be loaded into the canister without violating reactivity limits would be small. This would be picked up by the proposed neutron monitoring equipment providing an alert for the operators.
At this point, a decision would be required on how to proceed. One option would be to load only the relatively small quantity of high uranium content debris, meaning that the canister volume would be underutilized. This would be acceptable technically, but an economic penalty would be incurred (more canisters to purchase, handle, transport and store). An alternative would be to load such material into a canister of a modified design, as described hereinafter as the cruciform design.
In the preferred embodiment, the closure lid is a single piece lid design that is secured to the canister 10a using cone bolts, which can be operated using long handled underwater tools. The closure lid 17 is engaged and handled using a grapple tool that can also be used to handle the canister 10a. Once the closure lid 17 is fully installed and all of the bolts are properly torqued, the closure lid 17 can be engaged with the grapple tool to facilitate handling of the loaded canister.
The closure lid 17 is sealed to the upper head by use of an o-ring suitable for the designed configuration. The canister 10a accommodate the continuous passage of off-gases from the contained fuel debris. Accordingly, a traditional leak tight sealing configuration is not required. However, due to the fact that the canister 10a will be in underwater storage, a water tight configuration is needed. The canister 10a has a diameter that is no greater than about 49.5 cm, or about 19.5 inches, and an interior axial length that is no greater than about 381.0 cm, or about 150.0 inches, so that the radioactive debris cannot achieve nuclear criticality (or an undesirable nuclear reaction). In other words, the fuel debris is cut into small pieces and the pieces must be small enough to fit into the canister 10a, which ensures that they will not achieve unwanted nuclear criticality. Furthermore, it is assumed that the radioactive debris in each canister 10a contains an amount of uranium dioxide (UO2) fuel that is no greater than about 100 (kg, and an initial enrichment of the UO2 fuel is not greater than about 3.7 percent. It is further assumed that the canister 10a is fully loaded with the UO2 fuel and one or more other nonradioactive materials (e.g., carbon steel) in any volumetric ratio from 55:45 to 70:30, respectively. Further note that no nuetron absorber is needed in the first embodiment of the canister 10 to avoid unwanted nuclear criticality.
In essence, the flux trap 19 and neutron absorber slow down neutrons so that the neutrons are too slow to meaningfully affect the fission process in a non-thermalized condition. The flux trap 19 is particularly important when the canister 10b is in water. As a result of the flux trap 19, the canister 10b has four sectors, each of which can receive fuel debris, such as corium, or in the alternative, up to four nuclear fuel rod assemblies in whatever condition (unlike the first embodiment, which is not designed to contain such assemblies). The canister 10b has a diameter that is no greater than about 49.5 cm, or 19.5 inches, and an interior axial length that is no greater than about 381.0 cm, or about 150.0 inches, so that the radioactive debris cannot achieve unwanted nuclear criticality.
Details of an upper closure head 18 engaged with the lid 17 is shown in
Details of a lower closure head 25 is shown in
Access to the internal cavity of the canister 10 is controlled by vent and drain port fittings that are completely independent from the bolted closure lid 17. Each port fitting is a spring loaded poppet-style fitting 27, as illustrated in
Upon completion of draining and drying of the canister 10 and just prior to installation into the overpack 61 (
Although not limited to this design choice, in the preferred embodiments, all parts associated with the canisters 10, the basket 30, and the overpack 61 are made of metal, such as stainless steel, based upon its long term resistance to corrosion and its reasonable cost.
The perforated columnizing insert 100 is particularly useful when the debris is corium type debris in a finer form (less coarse form). With this type of debris, the drying process is more challenging. Use of the perforated columnizing insert 100 also has the advantage of reducing the risk of nuclear criticality as the fissile content is more organized.
More specifically, in terms of structure, the perforated columnizing insert 100 has a plurality of elongated cylindrical tubes 102, seven in this embodiment, that are parallel along their lengths inside of the canister 10a. The tubes 102 can be held together by any suitable mechanism(s). In the preferred embodiment, the tubes 102 are held together with a circular top rim 105 and a circular planar bottom plate 107. At the top, the tubes 102 fit into respective downwardly extending circular sockets 112, which have a diameter slightly larger than that of the tubes 102, and are welded in the sockets 112. At the bottom, the tubes 102 are welded to the bottom plate 107. Debris can be inserted into the tubes 102 via a plurality of circular openings 114 in the top rim 105.
Each of the tubes 102 has a side wall 104 extending between a top end and a bottom end and has a plurality of, preferably numerous, perforations 106. Each of the tubes 102 is wrapped with screening 109, part of which is shown in
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present invention, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible nonlimiting examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention.
This application is related to application Ser. No. 15/447,687, filed Mar. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,008,299.