1. Field of Invention
The current invention relates generally to apparatuses, systems and methods of detecting explosives. More particularly, the apparatuses, systems and methods relate to detecting explosives with different frequencies, and specifically, using a Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance (NQR) measurement system/device.
2. Description of Related Art
Modern day threats to the safety of people involve detonating explosives. Therefore, a variety of ways to detect explosives have been developed. For example, scanning machines have been developed to look through luggage at an airport to allow baggage screeners to see explosives and other weapons. Other screening devices are used to screen aircraft passengers. More recently NQR detection systems have been deployed to detect and identify explosives. Explosives and other compounds have unique NQR signatures that may consist of multiple NQR frequency emissions. The ability to see more than one NQR frequency from baggage or on persons improves the probability of correctly identifying explosives. Systems that do not look for multiple NQR frequencies may produce false positive results. A need, therefore, exists for an improved means for preventing false positives in NQR systems for remotely detecting explosives.
The NQR emissions from explosive substances are at a very low amplitude level compared to the RF signal that stimulated the emission. Most NQR measurement systems utilized a pulsed RE signal to stimulate the substance that will radiate NQR emissions. The measurement system produces a strong RF pulse, which could be several hundred watts, that is transmitted through a RF probe enclosed within an RE-isolated chamber that contains the package containing the suspected explosive material. Once the pulse is transmitted, the transmitter immediately shuts down, turning on circuitry to dampen probe resonances. A receiver is then turned on to listen to the weak NQR emissions from the substance. NQR emissions from nitrogen containing materials as well as other substances that produce NQR emissions exhibit an exponential decay. The receiver, if turned on quickly enough, captures the residual decaying emissions. Depending on the decay time constants of various materials, the pulse repetition rate can be slow thus preventing or limiting longer integration times to capture the emissions with stronger Signal-to-noise ratio.
A CW NQR measurement system, can pump more RF energy into those NQR frequencies at a much lower overall power, say a watt or lower. Moreover, the CW measurement system has more time to integrate over the NQR emissions from substances. In a CW NQR system, the receiver is simultaneously on while the transmitter is illuminating the package containing the suspect material. Receiver dynamic ranges exceeding 130 dB to 150 dB are required to receive the NQR emissions in the presence of the transmitted excitation signal to prevent self-jamming. Such receivers would be pushing the state of the art. An alternative solution is to provide a method to cancel as much of the transmitted signal as possible before it can enter the receiver but still fully illuminate the suspect material. This lowers the dynamic range requirements of the receiver to standard levels to be able to receive the weak NQR emissions from the explosive materials. This invention comprises a bridge circuit through which the CW excitation signal passes, but yet the receiver, connected across the balanced terminals of the bridge is isolated from the transmitted signal. One side of the bridge connects to the NQR measurement probe while the other side is connected to an impedance machine that balances the bridge.
The ability to perform NQR measurements at human-safe power levels enables the NQR measurement system to be incorporated within an RF-isolated corridor or room or chamber through which could check a person for explosives as that persons walks through a probe. Since most NQR frequencies are below 15 MHz, the hallway would appear as a waveguide operating in cutoff whereby no external man made or atmospheric RF noise could enter while people could pass through walking. Multiple probes could be installed in the hallway to test the passerby at multiple suspected explosive material NQR frequencies.
The preferred embodiment includes a Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance (NQR) system for detecting at least one material under test (MUT). The NQR system includes a waveform generator configured to generate a continuous wave (CW) input signal at one or more of a set of specified frequencies. A chamber installed with a probe receives at least one MUT that is carried by a person walking through the chamber. The probe, connected to the waveform generator, radiates a CW signal to illuminate the MUT while simultaneously listening with a receiver for an NQR emission. The waveform generator is connected to the NQR probe within the chamber through a balanced bridge circuit whereby one side of the bridge is connected to the probe and the other side is connected to a device capable of creating any impedance to match the impedance of the probe and thus balancing the bridge when there is no NQR emitting material present. The receiver is comprised of a differential amplifier front end that is connected across the balanced arms of the bridge. When a MUT with an NQR emission is present, that bridge arm connected to the probe receives the signal which unbalances the bridge and is detected by the receiver. A detector can then detect the MUT based, at least in part, on the resonance signal.
Another configuration of the preferred embodiment is an NQR measurement system for detecting a material. This measurement system includes an NRQ measurement chamber, a subtractor and a detector. The NQR measurement chamber receives the material as a person carries it through the chamber and an excited response signal is generated responsive to a CW signal transmitted into the chamber and the material. The subtractor generates a difference signal by subtracting a reference signal from response signal. The reference signal represents a CW signal transmitted into the chamber when the chamber is empty and lacking the material. The detector configured detects the material is present in the chamber based, at least in part, on the difference signal that represent the excited signal generated by the MUT.
Another configuration of the preferred embodiment is a method of detecting at least one material using Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance (NQR). The method inputs a continuous wave (CW) signal into an NQR chamber. In general, the chamber is a large waveguide allowing a person carrying a material under test (MUT) to walk/pass through the chamber. A reference signal representative of the chamber without a MUT in the chamber is measured/determined. An excited response signal from the chamber is received that includes the CW signal and at least one excited frequency responsive to the MUT. The reference signal is removed from the response signal to generate an excited difference signal. The material is detected based, at least in part, on whether the excited difference signal exceeds a threshold value. In some versions of the method, an alarm indicator is generated indicating the person associated with the contraband material is passing through the chamber. For example, the alarm can be generated on a screen at an airport to indicate to airport security that the person may have contraband material and that security personnel should take appropriate security precautions and actions.
One or more preferred embodiments that illustrate the best mode(s) are set forth in the drawings and in the following description. The appended claims particularly and distinctly point out and set forth the invention.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate various example methods, and other example embodiments of various aspects of the invention. It will be appreciated that the illustrated element boundaries (e.g., boxes, groups of boxes, or other shapes) in the figures represent one example of the boundaries. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that in some examples one element may be designed as multiple elements or that multiple elements may be designed as one element. In some examples, an element shown as an internal component of another element may be implemented as an external component and vice versa. Furthermore, elements may not be drawn to scale.
Similar numbers refer to similar parts throughout the drawings.
The NQR systems of this patent application are an improvement of prior art systems because CW signal is input into the novel NQR systems of this patent application without the need to “pulse” the input as in prior art systems. The CW signal is about one watt of power (or other FCC regulated value) so that people may safely past through an NQR chamber that the CW signal is transmitted into. The CW input signal is generally at a selected frequency between about 200 kHz and 30 MHz. When the input signal excites a material under test (MUT) such as an explosive or other material at its NQR frequency, the MUT releases an NQR emission that contains one or more frequencies responsive to the MUT.
In the system 1 of
The same continuous wave (CW) signal is injected into both chambers. The signals returned from the probes within the chambers are tapped off the transmission lines through directional couplers 17 and 19 and sent to the two terminals of the primary side of the transformer 15. The common mode signals are not coupled to the secondary side of the transformer while the differential signals are transferred to the secondary terminals of the transformer. The signal at the secondary terminals is amplified through an amplifier 13 and then detected. The detector and amplifier 13 constitute the receiver of the system. In some configurations to the transformer and possibly amplifier 13 can be replaced by a differential amplifier.
In operation, if an individual 52 carrying contraband enters or passes through the first coil 42, the material under test they are carrying will not be picked up by the second coil 44 because the individual and MUT have not yet reached the second coil 44. Therefore the second transmission line 44 can at that time be considered as an empty chamber as discussed above with reference to
In the embodiment of
The chambers discussed above may require the detection of very small NQR CW signals at high frequencies and also may require that reflections or active responses from a target be measured at the same time as the target is illuminated. The receiver ideally should be able to detect very low level responses while being illuminated by a very strong excitation signal. For very sensitive receivers, the excitation signal is too strong and saturates the receiver signal whereby the receiver cannot detect the small response signals from the target. Therefore, a receiver/detector with a very high dynamic range (ratio of peak to smallest signal detectable) is typically used to detect very small signals. Radars function by sending strong pulses and detecting very weak responses. Radars have a special advantage in that the target is usually quite far away in terms of wavelengths since most radars operate at microwave frequencies and higher. This allows the radar to send out a pulse, shut down, and then turn on the receiver to get the response. Therefore the receiver is not on at the same time as the transmitter. In cases when the target is much closer, the transmitter and receiver might be on at the same time, but directional devices such as circulators can be used to separate outgoing signals from incoming signals and thus minimize the possibility of the transmitter overloading the receiver amplifier. At high frequencies, circulators which have the amount of isolation needed are generally not available. The wavelength can be kilometers long and hence separation delay is not a feasible option as in radar. A method to minimize the excitation signal to a level where a receiver with standard dynamic range is needed to measure the response signal. Initial assumptions are that the NQR response is between −130 dB to −150 dB below the excitation signal. Hence, if 60 to 70 dB of isolation could be obtained, it would be possible to detect the response with a sensitive receiver having 60 to 80 dB of dynamic range.
A general description of how a NQR system detects chemical compounds on humans is now provided. Chemical compounds of interest have NQR signatures at frequencies as low as a few hundred KHz to low MHz. Medium frequency (MF) to high frequency (HF) noise in that low frequency regime such as originating from lightning, solar atmospheric ionization, meteor tracks, radio stations, power lines, and other man-made noises such as from motors, computers, etc.—is quite high. NQR measurements are generally done in a radio frequency (RF) insulated booth or tunnel to prevent the unwanted atmospheric and man-made noises from corrupting the measurement data.
Description of the Test Chamber
A waveguide has a cutoff wavelength λoc dependent on its dimensions. For wavelengths larger than the cutoff wavelength, the attenuation is given 3 where
Where:
The bridge circuit 64 consists of the complex impedances Z1, Z2, Z3, and Z4. Z1 and Z2 preferably are resistive and roughly equal to each other; however, they can have different values. Z4 is the impedance of the tunnel probe 74 described above or any other probe used to measure the NQR response. Z3 is the reference impedance and is automatically adjusted to match that of Z4, but more specifically to make V3=V4, thereby driving V5 to zero volts. When V5=0, the common mode driving voltage V0 has been canceled and is not detected by the receiver comprised of 68, 70 and 72.
However, matching Z3 exactly to Z4 is not physically possible throughout the measurement process. This is because Z4 changes as a person walks through the probe and, since the person only walks through the probe once, it is not possible to compare V3 and V4 when the person is carrying the substance of interest (MUT) to when he is not. In a static laboratory measurement, the sample holder would be placed inside the probe chamber and measured over a band of frequencies. The associated reference impedances Z3 would be saved. The compound of interest (MUT) would then be placed into the sample holder, with the assumption that the impedance Z4 is not affected by the introduction of the material, and a rerun would be conducted of the measurements applying the reference values for Z3 that were earlier collected. At the NQR resonant frequency, V2 would appear and detected at V5.
In a dynamic situation with a person walking through the probe chamber, the luxury of making measurements of the person without and with material samples is not available. Therefore, an alternative approach is required to get the reference measurement.
Noting that the NQR resonance is very narrow banded (˜100 Hz), the probe is designed to be a non-resonant device whereby the fluctuation in impedance does not change more than a fraction of a percent over a fixed frequency bandwidth of a few kilohertz. The reference measurement is done at a non-NQR resonant frequency. Within the digital signal processor 72, an algorithm such as the LMS, the simplex, the min-max or any other optimization routine adjusts the real and imaginary parts of Z3 such that V5 is driven to a null (zero volts). Z3 can be a variable resistor and a variable capacitor in series, implemented with PIN and varactor diode circuitry. Z3 can also be an impedance machine. These are mixed signal devices with output load terminals whose impedance can be located anywhere within a Smith Chart. A second measurement at the other extreme of the band could be averaged with the first measurement to determine a second complex Z3=R3+jX3 value. Then several measurements over the band in which the NQR resonant frequency is expected to be found are done with Z3 set to the previously calibrated value. When the NQR voltage V2 appears at its resonant frequency if the compound of interest is present, then detection would be made. All these measurements can be performed in a fraction of a second so that the person's motion and location have not changed enough to dynamically change Z4. NQR resonant frequencies for most materials are temperature dependent. Hence, ambient temperature could be monitored along with an infrared (IR) scan to obtain body temperature to determine desired frequency bands over which to perform measurements while the person is walking through the probe chamber.
The fact that Z3 is dynamically mimicking the environment and being adaptively updated by the digital controller produces a noise-riding threshold and constant false alarm rate. The environment may change due to nearby objects or a person's proximity to the probe, and this change is detected by the differential amplifier. Impedance Z3 is readjusted for a null at a non-NQR frequency. The non-NQR frequency is close enough to the NQR frequency so that the difference in probe impedance vs. frequency is less than the difference in signal level produced when the frequency is set to the NQR frequency and material is present.
The system is similar in concept to a Dicke radiometer where small differences in level of S+N (signal plus noise) vs. N (noise only) are AC-coupled to eliminate DC drift and bias, and amplified for detection. Such devices are capable of measuring power levels below thermal noise, limited only by signal processing power and integration time.
The processes of common mode signal cancellation is now described. Basic analysis of the circuit in
The influence of the common mode voltage V1 disappears when
and in the preferred embodiment where Z1 and Z2 are can be selected as resistors. Their values could be selected to scale the probe impedance Z4 to a range where a reasonable circuit to produce reference impedance Z3 can be designed. For example, if Z1=Z2, Z1=0.5*Z3, then Z3=Z4. The amount of common mode voltage V1 cancellation that can be attained will be directly a factor of how close Z3 matches Z4. Furthermore, assuming Z3 can be matched exactly to Z4, the next assumption is that Z4 does not change much from the reference frequency measurement to the actual measurement. For the sake of argument, assume that Z4′ becomes (1+α)Z4. Then V5 becomes
For a 1% change (α=0.01), the suppression of V1 is 53 dB. Therefore, if the ratio of V1 to V2 is 130 dB, then a detection circuit with a dynamic range of at least 77 dB would detect V2, assuming no other noise sources.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the apparatus of the invention will reduce the dynamic range requirement by the level of common mode rejection that it can achieve. If a common mode rejection of 70 dB is achieved on a measurement requiring 130 dB, then the range has been reduced to 60 dB. Nevertheless, this does not change the sensitivity required in terms of absolute power levels measured.
Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the method and apparatus of this invention could also be used for the detection of buried pipes or wires through LF and MF excitation. Low frequency RF can penetrate soil better than radar signals at ultra-high frequency (UHF) and Microwave frequencies. The reflection of RF signals from buried metal conductors can be −80 to −100 dB below the excitation signal at resonance. The use of the common mode rejection circuit would provide the ability to transmit and receive a CW signal simultaneously at these low frequencies.
In some configuration the embodiments discussed above can be used in clandestine environments to detect explosive, drugs and other contraband on people without them even knowing that they are being observed. For example, may airports have short and/or long term parking lots that are connected to long walkways that people must pass through when walking from their car to the airport. It is envisioned that NQR systems such as the system 40 illustrated in
Clandestine types of uses of the NQR measurement systems described above can include uses in screening people entering sports stadiums. NQR systems could also be built into almost any public building and disguised as part of those buildings. Additionally clandestine NQR systems could be built into entrances into subway systems, bus terminals and other transportation systems. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the NQR systems discussed above and other variations of them can be used in other environments where it is desirable to find individuals that are carrying contraband such as explosives, drugs and the like.
Example methods may be better appreciated with reference to flow diagrams. While for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the illustrated methodologies are shown and described as a series of blocks, it is to be appreciated that the methodologies are not limited by the order of the blocks, as some blocks can occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other blocks from that shown and described. Moreover, less than all the illustrated blocks may be required to implement an example methodology. Blocks may be combined or separated into multiple components. Furthermore, additional and/or alternative methodologies can employ additional, not illustrated blocks.
The related and co-owned U.S. Application entitled “METHOD FOR DETECTING TARGET MATERIALS USING NUCLEAR QUADRUPOLE RESONANCE,” which is filed contemporaneously herewith, is incorporated herein as if fully rewritten.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. Therefore, the invention is not limited to the specific details, the representative embodiments, and illustrative examples shown and described. Thus, this application is intended to embrace alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Moreover, the description and illustration of the invention is an example and the invention is not limited to the exact details shown or described. References to “the preferred embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “one example”, “an example”, and so on, indicate that the embodiment(s) or example(s) so described may include a particular feature, structure, characteristic, property, element, or limitation, but that not every embodiment or example necessarily includes that particular feature, structure, characteristic, property, element or limitation. Furthermore, repeated use of the phrase “in the preferred embodiment” does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, though it may.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/692,819, filed Aug. 24, 2012 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/692,858, filed Aug. 24, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3641440 | Bush | Feb 1972 | A |
4352180 | Schulze | Sep 1982 | A |
4513292 | Bowman | Apr 1985 | A |
5076993 | Sawa et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5166615 | Sidles | Nov 1992 | A |
5206592 | Buess et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5233300 | Buess et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5539412 | Mendelson | Jul 1996 | A |
5594338 | Magnuson | Jan 1997 | A |
5608321 | Garroway et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
6046586 | Rinard | Apr 2000 | A |
6054856 | Garroway et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6100688 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104190 | Buess et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6166541 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6194898 | Magnuson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6411835 | Modell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6486838 | Smith | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6777937 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6822444 | Lai | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6900633 | Sauer et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7106244 | Hsu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119682 | Fisher | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142109 | Frank | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151447 | Willms et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7170288 | Fullerton | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188513 | Wilson | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7265550 | Laubacher et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292033 | Pusiol | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7345478 | Lieblich et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352180 | Manneschi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365536 | Crowley et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7394250 | Itozaki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7394363 | Ghahramani | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7397239 | Crowley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397377 | Young et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7417440 | Peschmann et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7471744 | Van Wechel et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7511496 | Schiano | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511514 | Crowley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511654 | Goldman et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7521932 | Carter et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7595638 | Crowley | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7768262 | Schiano | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7880467 | Rapoport | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888646 | Breit et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8463557 | Apostolos et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8570038 | Zank et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8674697 | Apostolos et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8710837 | Zank et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8773127 | Apostolos et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8922211 | Apostolos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9052371 | Apostolos | Jun 2015 | B1 |
20030071619 | Sauer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040138838 | Scheiner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150550 | Shouno et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040196036 | Lai | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222790 | Karmi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235435 | Barabash | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050059355 | Liu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128069 | Skatter | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050241639 | Zilberg | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060012371 | Laubacher et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060122484 | Itozaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132127 | Fullerton | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060232274 | Shilstone et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261942 | Frank | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070096731 | Peshkovsky | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153974 | Smith | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070221863 | Zipf | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070266771 | Goldson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018332 | Lieblich et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036462 | Schiano | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080309339 | Chisholm et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090039884 | Schiano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041187 | Peschmann et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046538 | Breed et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085565 | Fullerton | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153346 | Crowley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100022009 | Yaniv | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100212401 | Crowley et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110102597 | Daly et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110187363 | Zank et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120086450 | Crowley et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120161771 | Apostolos et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120206141 | Apostolos et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140333302 | Apostolos | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0813685 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1801607 | Jun 2007 | EP |
9703366 | Jan 1997 | WO |
2006071198 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mool Chand Gupta, Book titled Atomic and molecular spectroscopy, 2001, p. 388. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,820. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,859. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,893. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/975,940. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61692819 | Aug 2012 | US | |
61692858 | Aug 2012 | US |