This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to French Patent Application No. 07 04326, filed in FRANCE on Jun. 15, 2007.
This disclosure relates to nucleus prostheses for implantation in an intervertebral disc or in an intervertebral disc space, and more particularly to replace a nucleus pulposus of an intervertebral disc.
An intervertebral disc located between two vertebrae in the spine provides structural support and distributes forces exerted on the spinal column. Besides holding the vertebrae together, enabling upright posture and natural curvature of the spine (lordosis or kyphosis, for example, within normal physiological ranges), a healthy intervertebral disc enables flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the vertebrae.
The major components of an intervertebral disc include the annulus fibrosus, the nucleus pulposus, and cartilage endplates. The annulus fibrosus is a tough, fibrous ring attached to the vertebrae directly above and below the disc space. The tire-like annulus fibrosus supports the adjacent vertebrae and limits their relative displacements in translation and rotation. The annulus fibrosus also contains the nucleus pulposus. The nucleus pulposus is the central portion of the disc, comprising a relatively soft, gel-like substance that provides many of the articulation and cushioning properties of the intervertebral disc.
Intervertebral discs may be injured or become damaged by disease or aging. A common problem is disc herniation, in which portions of the nucleus pulposus is extruded through an opening in the annulus. Portions of the nucleus pulposus protruding into the vertebral canal may press on a spinal nerve, often resulting in nerve damage, intense pain, numbness, reduced mobility, and muscle weakness. When degeneration or disease of the natural intervertebral disc has progressed to the point where non-operative care such as medication, injections, and/or physical therapy is ineffective, surgical intervention may be required.
A common procedure for treatment of a degenerated or diseased intervertebral disc involves removal of the natural tissues of the disc and fusion of the adjacent vertebrae (intervertebral arthrodesis). Another frequently used procedure, generally considered before the intervertebral arthrodesis, implies the withdrawal of the natural tissues and the replacement of the intervertebral disc by an intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide nucleus prostheses comprising a plurality of segments, including a leading segment and a trailing segment, and a linkage coupling the segments. The prosthesis of various embodiments has an open position in which the segments are disposed along the linkage in a serial line with the leading segment at an end of the serial line and the trailing segment at another end of the serial line, and a closed position in which the segments are disposed to form a disc shape with the leading segment and the trailing segment substantially apposed.
Various embodiments of the instant invention are configured for use as a fusion device (e.g., for an arthrodesis). However, fusion eliminates the mobility between the adjacent vertebrae and can transfer stresses and movements to the intervertebral discs above and/or below the point of fusion. Accordingly, a treatment that maintains some mobility of the vertebrae directly above and below the disc space may be preferred. Various embodiments of the present invention may be configured for use to maintain some mobility of the vertebrae directly above and below the disc space.
Various embodiments of a method are disclosed (as an illustration). For example, an embodiment of method includes inserting a plurality of linked segments into an annulus fibrosus and closing the nucleus prosthesis so that a first segment (e.g., a leading segment) inserted into the annulus fibrosus and a last segment (e.g., a trailing segment) inserted into the annulus fibrosus are substantially abutted.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the descriptions of this disclosure. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent after appreciating the description, drawings, and the claims.
In various embodiments in which the prosthesis 30 is used as a fusion device, it can be deployed within remaining portions of the annulus fibrosus or deployed within the intervertebral disc space following a complete discectomy. As a fusion device, the prosthesis 30 can be configured to promote ingrowth of osseous tissue and can be disposed in the disc space to facilitate fusion of the vertebrae 12a and 12b.
Prosthesis 30 includes a plurality of segments 32.
Segments 32 may be linked together by at least one link. For example in
Ligament 36 may also include a closure element, for example such as loop 38. Loop 38 can be used during the surgical implantation of the prosthesis 30, as described below. Other fastening or retaining devices may be employed as a closure element in place of a loop, such as for example a hook, catch, or clamp. In an open position of prosthesis 30, segments 32 may be disposed along ligament 36 in a serial line (i.e., one after another) from segment 32c closest to loop 38 to segment 32a furthest from loop 38. In an open position, the prosthesis 30 will have a leading segment, such as for example segment 32c, and a trailing segment, such as for example segment 32a, with the designations “leading” and “trailing” established by the direction in which prosthesis 30 is implanted (see, e.g.,
Segments 32 are shaped such that when the prosthesis 30 is in a closed position (see
Various embodiments may be feature chamfered, tapered, or beveled edges to mitigate damage to the vertebral surfaces. For example, the embodiments illustrated in
The disc shape formed by segments 32 when the prosthesis 30 is in a closed position may have one or more apertures or voids along either or both of its vertebral contact surfaces and/or along one or more external and/or internal walls or faces of one or more of the segments of the prosthesis. These apertures may consist in blind holes or holes passing through the segments.
Optionally, the diverter may have selectable flexibility, for example by having setting for insertion of the prosthesis in which the diverter is relatively rigid while having another setting for withdrawal of the insertion instrument in which the diverter is relatively flexible. For example, the deflector may have multiple articulated segments along the insertion direction through which a common conduit passes. During insertion of the prosthesis, for example, a “J” shaped spring steel spline (having memory shape or spring properties) having an end with an appropriate curvature may be forced into a straight position and passed along the length of the insertion tool through a conduit into the conduit of the deflector segments. When the spline is fully inserted through the insertion tool conduit and the common conduit through the articulated deflecting segments, the deflector would tend to maintain the appropriate curvature for insertion of the prosthesis. When the prosthesis has been inserted, the spline could be withdrawn fully from the conduits, releasing conformal forces on the articulated deflecting segments and allowing them to articulate and align with each other during withdrawal of the insertion instrument.
In various embodiments, a positioner may be used during insertion of the prosthesis. For example, the positioner depicted in
In various embodiments, a positioner may be used to urge a prosthesis along an insertion instrument. In some embodiments, the positioner may be used to maintain the nucleus prosthesis within the annulus fibrosus 16 or within the intervertebral disc space while a linking element, such as ligament 36, is employed to close the prosthesis, and may also be used to further urge the prosthesis into proper position during the closure operation.
This tightening may be aided by one or more lubricants on ligament 36. As mentioned above, when prosthesis 30 is in a closed position, face 46a of segment 32a and face 46c of segment 32c are substantially apposed. A positioner 54 may be used to hold the prosthesis 30 in position while ligament 36 is tightened.
Next, loop 38 can be permanently fastened to maintain prosthesis 30 in a closed position. In alternate embodiments, other techniques can be used to keep prosthesis 30 in a closed position. After prosthesis 30 is in a closed position, ligament 36 can be trimmed, chute 50 can be removed, and annulus fibrosus 16 can be closed. Preferably the surgical incision will be sized so that the prosthesis 30 in a closed position will not fit through the surgical incision, although in some embodiments, prosthesis 30 can be returned to an open position for removal via the surgical incision.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
In this embodiment, segments 110a, 110b, and 110c are linked together with two ligaments 36a and 36b. As with earlier described embodiments, ligaments 36a and 36b are used to urge segments 110 into a closed position, and may be used to maintain the prosthesis 30 in a closed position. In the embodiment depicted in
The linking elements may be devised to accommodate the shapes and irregularities of the surfaces of the adjacent vertebrae. For example, in various embodiments the ligaments 36a and 36b may be configured with an elasticity that will allow the individual segments of the prosthesis 30 to move vertically with respect to one another when prosthesis 30 is in a closed position. Optionally, the ligaments 36a and 36b may be configured with an elasticity that will allow the segments 110a, 110b, and 110c to spread apart to adapt to any protuberance on a surface of either or both of the adjacent vertebrae.
Various embodiments may have one or more segments in which the height of a segment varies among different portions of the segment. Such variations may accommodate various shapes of the surfaces of the adjacent vertebrae. For example, segments 110a, 110b, and 110c of the embodiments illustrated in
Various embodiments may also have retainers to hold the ligaments. The embodiment illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Cross-sectional views along the cut-lines shown in
As mentioned above, prosthesis 130 is configured to close so that segments 132 form a disc shape. In particular, like prosthesis 30 described above, prosthesis 130 may be surgically introduced into the annulus fibrosus 16 in an open position and then bent to a closed position as it enters the disc. In various embodiments, prosthesis 130 is bent by pulling on ligament 134.
In various other embodiments, the enclosure may be provided separately from the insertion instrument. In some embodiments, after a surgical incision is made into the annulus fibrosus, an insertion instrument such as chute 50 is put into place and an enclosure 162 is compressed or folded and fed through the chute 50 into the nucleus area.
Once inside the annulus fibrosus 16 or the intervertebral disc space, in various embodiments enclosure 162 may return generally to its normal shape. Although the embodiment illustrated in
In various embodiments, the use of an insertion instrument may have advantageous. For example, in embodiments in which enclosure 162 does not have sufficient stiffness for the enclosure 162 to have a normal shape, an insertion instrument may be used to hold the enclosure open and/or in place during the insertion of the prosthesis. For example,
In various embodiments, the prosthesis may be deployed with other spinal stabilization structures. For example,
Flexible vertebral stabilization devices may also be deployed with a prosthesis. For example,
In some embodiments, multiple prostheses may be deployed within the annulus fibrosus 16 or the intervertebral disc space. For example,
Various embodiments may be configured to mitigate or impose lordosis or kyphosis. For example,
Those of skill in the art will recognize after appreciating this disclosure that the steps of the various methods, processes, and other techniques disclosed herein need not be performed in any particular order, unless otherwise expressly stated or logically necessary to satisfy expressly stated conditions. In addition, after appreciating this disclosure those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied in a variety of different forms and that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. References herein to surfaces or other structures as “upper,” “top,” “lower,” “bottom,” or having a “height,” “width,” or “length,” and directional references such as “horizontal” and “vertical,” are generally arbitrary and for convenience only, and those of skill in the art will recognize after appreciating this disclosure that such designations appropriately may be reoriented in particular embodiments. The described embodiments are illustrative only and are not restrictive, and the scope of the invention is defined solely by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 04326 | Jun 2007 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4865606 | Rehder | Sep 1989 | A |
5033607 | Rivera | Jul 1991 | A |
5171280 | Baumgartner | Dec 1992 | A |
5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5480442 | Bertagnoli | Jan 1996 | A |
5534023 | Henley | Jul 1996 | A |
5556431 | Buttner-Janz | Sep 1996 | A |
5562736 | Ray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5702391 | Lin | Dec 1997 | A |
5702454 | Baumgartner | Dec 1997 | A |
5755797 | Baumgartner | May 1998 | A |
5824093 | Ray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6006458 | Weiss | Dec 1999 | A |
6022376 | Assell | Feb 2000 | A |
6093205 | McLeod et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110210 | Norton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6273914 | Papas | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6482234 | Weber et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6579291 | Keith et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602291 | Ray et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620196 | Trieu | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6689125 | Keith | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6726721 | Stoy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6893466 | Trieu | May 2005 | B2 |
7037340 | Gau | May 2006 | B2 |
7056344 | Huppert et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7198047 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7258700 | Lambrecht et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7291170 | Huppert | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326250 | Beaurain et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351262 | Bindseil et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7494508 | Zeegers | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507248 | Beaurain et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524333 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563282 | Lambrecht et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7591853 | Felt et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594931 | Louis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618461 | Trieu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628814 | Studer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632282 | Dinville | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682396 | Beaurain et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695516 | Zeegers | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695518 | Gau | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7842088 | Rashbaum et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7867278 | Lambrecht et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8002835 | Zeegers | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8021425 | Lambrecht et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025697 | Abdelgany | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034109 | Zwirkoski | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8147556 | Louis et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162988 | Delecrin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8221422 | Mangione | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221457 | Delecrin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241359 | Davis et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8257437 | Lambrecht et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8257439 | Zeegers | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262700 | Cho et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267999 | Beaurain et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8343219 | Allain et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8409284 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8409288 | Davis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430915 | Beaurain et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439931 | Dinville | May 2013 | B2 |
8454617 | Schaller et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8465546 | Jodaitis et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020151979 | Lambrecht et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030023311 | Trieu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069639 | Sander et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040030392 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034429 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040249464 | Bindseil et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260397 | Lambrecht et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043801 | Trieu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060052872 | Studer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064172 | Trieu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074489 | Bryan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060142858 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189999 | Zwirkoski | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190083 | Arnin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217812 | Lambrecht et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265077 | Zwirkoski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050036 | Felt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080125865 | Abdelgany | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133012 | McGuckin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208255 | Siegal | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215154 | Lambrecht et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221687 | Viker | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012616 | James et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090281517 | Lambrecht et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110106264 | Lambrecht et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118844 | Lambrecht | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3726969 | Mar 1989 | DE |
9304368 | May 1993 | DE |
19527975 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19710392 | Jul 1999 | DE |
19710392 | Jul 1999 | DE |
0577179 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0621020 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1157676 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2797179 | Feb 2001 | FR |
2838956 | Oct 2003 | FR |
2913331 | Sep 2008 | FR |
2917287 | Dec 2008 | FR |
WO9900074 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO0061037 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0062719 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0108612 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0180786 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0217824 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO02054978 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO02071921 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO03007853 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO03084444 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2004100841 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2005002474 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005092248 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005122956 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006066228 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006072941 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2006091744 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2006092015 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2008152501 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Implant for Osseous Anchoring with Polyaxial Head, U.S. Appl. No. 10/498,234, filed Dec. 7, 2004. |
Osseous anchoring implant with a polyaxial head and method for installing the implant, U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,080, filed Jun. 9, 2006. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, filed Feb. 4, 2005. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis and Instrumentation for Insertion of the Prosthesis Between the Vertebrae, U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,253, filed Feb. 24, 2006. |
Intersomatic cage with unified grafts, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,386, filed Jun. 22, 2007. |
Modular intervertebral prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 11/874,144, filed Oct. 17, 2007. |
Vertebral Support Device, U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,285, filed Dec. 17, 2007. |
Intervertebral disc prosthesis, surgical methods, and fitting tools, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, filed Feb. 4, 2008. |
Intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion assemblies, U.S. Appl. No. 12/527,373, filed Aug. 14, 2009. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,898, filed Nov. 29, 2010. |
Instruments and Methods for Removing Fixation Devices from Intervertebral Implants, U.S. Appl. No. 13/158,761, filed Jun. 13, 2011. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 13/215,123, filed Aug. 22, 2011. |
Interspinous Implant and Implantation Instrument, U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,650, filed Feb. 9, 2012. |
Vertebral Cage Device With Modular Fixation, U.S. Appl. No. 13/438,352, filed Apr. 3, 2012. |
Plate for osteosynthesis device and method of preassembling such device, U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,927, filed Apr. 24, 2012. |
Anchoring Device and System for an Intervertebral Implant, Intervertebral Implant and Implantation Instrument, U.S. Appl. No. 13/520,041, filed Jun. 29, 2012. |
Anchoring Device and System for an Intervertebral Implant, Intervertebral Implant and Implantation Instrument, U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,078, filed Jun. 29, 2012. |
Transforaminal intersomatic cage for an intervertebral fusion graft and an instrument for implanting the cage, U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,063, filed Aug. 14, 2012. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 13/603,043, filed Sep. 4, 2012. |
Intervertebral Disk Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,448, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis and Instrumentation for Insertion of the Prosthesis Between the Vertebrae, U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,797, filed Sep. 15, 2012. |
Intersomatic cage, intervertebral prosthesis, anchoring device and implantation instruments, U.S. Appl. No. 13/732,244, filed Dec. 31, 2012. |
Anchoring device and system for an intervertebral implant, intervertebral implant and implantation instrument, U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,547, filed Feb. 22, 2013. |
Transforanimal intersomatic cage for an intervertebral fusion graft and an instrument for implanting the cage, U.S. Appl. No. 13/854,808, filed Apr. 1, 2013. |
Spinal Osteosynthesis Device and Preparation Method, U.S. Appl. No. 13/873,190, filed Apr. 29, 2013. |
Instrumentation and Methods for Inserting an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis, U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, filed May 13, 2013. |
Intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion assemblies, U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,704, filed Jun. 17, 2013. |
National Institute of Industrial Property (France); Preliminary Search Report in Fench Pub. No. FR2917287; Dec. 19, 2008; National Institute of Industrial Property (France); France; all pages. |
World Intellectual Property Organization; Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Pub'n No. WO200815250; Dec. 22, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages. |
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Pub'n No. WO2008152501; Jun. 30, 2009; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages. |
World Intellectual Property Organization; International Search Report for PCT Pub'n WO2008152501; Dec. 22, 2008; WIPO; Geneva, Switzerland; all pages. |
European Patent Office, Office Action for Pub'n No. EP2170226; May 6, 2013; EPO; Munich, Germany; all pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action for Pub'n No. EP2170226; Jul. 27, 2012; EPO; Munich, Germany; all pages. |
European Patent Office; Office Action for Pub'n No. EP2170226; Jan. 17, 2012; EPO; Munich, Germany; all pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Claim Amendments for Pub'n No. EP2170226; Feb. 10, 2010; EPO; Munich, Germany; all pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Issue Notification in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Mar. 24, 2010; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Dec. 3, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Inteview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Oct. 28, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Sep. 28, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Request for Continued Examination with Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Sep. 23, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Terminal Disclaimer in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Sep. 23, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Mar. 24, 2009; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Dec. 19, 2008; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/390,711; Jun. 19, 2008; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Amendment after Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Nov. 3, 2005; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Aug. 30, 2005; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Jun. 22, 2005; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Feb. 18, 2005; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Request for Continued Examination with Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Dec. 8, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virginia; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Nov. 22, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Nov. 8, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Jun. 8, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Mar. 19, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
LDR Medical, by its attorneys; Reply to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Feb. 9, 2004; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/060,862; Aug. 8, 2003; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina; All Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080312743 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |