This disclosure relates to video encoding and decoding.
Digital video streams typically represent video using a sequence of frames or still images. Digital video can be used for various applications including, for example, video conferencing, high definition video entertainment, video advertisements, or sharing of user-generated videos. A digital video stream may contain a large amount of data and may utilize substantial resources, such as processing, transmission, and storage resources. Various approaches have been proposed to reduce the amount of data in video streams, including compression and other encoding techniques.
Implementations of systems, methods, and apparatuses for encoding and decoding a video signal using object-based intra-prediction are disclosed herein.
One aspect of the disclosed implementations is a method for encoding a video stream including a plurality of frames having a plurality of blocks including a current block. The method includes segmenting the current block into a first portion and at least a second portion; generating, for at least some of a plurality of pixels in the first portion, corresponding predicted values according to at least a first intra-prediction mode; generating, for at least some of a plurality of pixels in the second portion, corresponding predicted values according to at least a second intra-prediction mode; and encoding the current block using the predicted values for the first portion and the predicted values for the second portion.
Another aspect of the disclosed implementations is an apparatus for encoding a video stream including a plurality of frames having a plurality of blocks including a current block. The apparatus includes a memory and a processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to segment the current block into a first portion and at least a second portion; generate, for at least some of a plurality of pixels in the first portion, corresponding predicted values according to at least a first intra-prediction mode; generate, for at least some of a plurality of pixels in the second portion, a corresponding predicted values according to at least a second intra-prediction mode; and encode the current block using the predicted value for the first portion and the predicted value for the second portion.
Variations in these and other aspects are described in additional detail hereafter.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Digital video is used for various purposes including, for example, remote business meetings via video conferencing, high definition video entertainment, video advertisements, and sharing of user-generated videos. The generation, storage, transmission, and display of a video signal, such as high quality digital video communicated using a limited bandwidth medium, can include video compression using one or more video encoding and decoding schemes. Video encoding and decoding can include using prediction schemes, such as inter-prediction and intra-prediction, to reduce redundancy and improve compression efficiency.
Intra-prediction schemes may improve compression efficiency by generating predicted pixel values based on directional similarities, such as horizontal or vertical similarities, between pixels in a video signal, such as pixels in one or more blocks in a frame. However, intra-prediction based on directional similarities may be inefficient for predicting pixel values for blocks that includes multiple directional features or objects. To improve compression efficiency for blocks including multiple directional features, object-based intra-prediction may be used.
Implementations of object-based intra-prediction may include predicting pixel values for a block in a frame of an input video signal using a combination of intra-prediction modes. For example, a block can be segmented into portions (objects) based on one or more defined segmentation schemes, and a prediction mode, such as an object-based prediction mode, may be identified for predicting pixel values in each respective object. The segmentation schemes may be selected so that each segmented portion includes highly correlated data. For example, a segmented portion may correspond to an object, or part of an object, captured in a video scene, and a prediction mode may be identified for predicting pixel values for each respective segmented portion.
In some implementations, object-based prediction modes, such as one or more of the object-based prediction modes shown in
A network 28 connects transmitting station 12 and a receiving station 30 for encoding and decoding of the video stream. For example, the video stream can be encoded in transmitting station 12 and the encoded video stream can be decoded in receiving station 30. Network 28 can be, for example, the Internet. Network 28 can also be a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), virtual private network (VPN), a cellular telephone network or any other means of transferring the video stream from transmitting station 12 to, in this example, receiving station 30.
Receiving station 30 can, in one example, be a computer having an internal configuration of hardware including a processor such as a CPU 32 and a memory 34. CPU 32 is a controller for controlling the operations of receiving station 30. CPU 32 can be connected to memory 34 by, for example, a memory bus. Memory 34 can be ROM, RAM or any other suitable memory device. Memory 34 can store data and program instructions that are used by CPU 32. Other suitable implementations of receiving station 30 are possible. For example, the processing of receiving station 30 can be distributed among multiple devices.
A display 36 configured to display a video stream can be connected to receiving station 30. Display 36 can be implemented in various ways, including by a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode-ray tube (CRT), or a light emitting diode display (LED), such as an OLED display. Display 36 is coupled to CPU 32 and can be configured to display a rendering 38 of the video stream decoded in receiving station 30.
Other implementations of the encoder and decoder system 10 are also possible. For example, one implementation can omit network 28 and/or display 36. In another implementation, a video stream can be encoded and then stored for transmission at a later time by receiving station 30 or any other device having memory. In one implementation, receiving station 30 receives (e.g., via network 28, a computer bus, and/or some communication pathway) the encoded video stream and stores the video stream for later decoding. In another implementation, additional components can be added to the encoder and decoder system 10. For example, a display or a video camera can be attached to transmitting station 12 to capture the video stream to be encoded.
At the next level, single frame 56 can be divided into a set of blocks 58, which can contain data corresponding to, in some of the examples described below, a 4×4 pixel group in frame 56. Block 58 can also be of any other suitable size such as a block of 16×8 pixels, a block of 8×8 pixels, a block of 16×16 pixels or of any other size. Depending on the application, block 58 can also refer to a subblock, which is a subdivision of a macroblock. Unless otherwise noted, the term ‘block’ can include a subblock, a macroblock, a segment, a slice, a residual block or any other portion of a frame. A frame, a block, a pixel, or a combination thereof can include display information, such as luminance information, chrominance information, or any other information that can be used to store, modify, communicate, or display the video stream or a portion thereof.
When video stream 50 is presented for encoding, each frame 56 within video stream 50 can be processed in units of blocks. At intra/inter-prediction stage 72, each block of the multiple sub-images can be encoded using either intra-prediction (i.e., within a single frame) or inter-prediction (i.e. from frame to frame). In either case, a prediction block can be formed. The prediction block is then subtracted from the current block to produce a residual block (also referred to herein as residual).
Intra-prediction (also referred to herein as intra-prediction or intra-frame prediction) and inter-prediction (also referred to herein as inter-prediction or inter-frame prediction) are techniques used in modern image/video compression schemes. In the case of intra-prediction, a prediction block can be formed from samples in the current frame that have been previously encoded and reconstructed. In the case of inter-prediction, a prediction block can be formed from samples in one or more previously constructed reference frames.
The prediction block is then subtracted from the current block; the difference, i.e., the residual is then encoded and transmitted to decoders. Image or video codecs may support many different intra and inter-prediction modes; each image block can use one of the prediction modes to provide a prediction block that is most similar to the current block to minimize the information to be encoded in the residual. The prediction mode for each block can also be encoded and transmitted, so a decoder can use same prediction mode(s) to form prediction blocks in the decoding and reconstruction process.
The prediction mode can be selected from one of multiple intra-prediction modes defined in video standards such as H.264, VPx and HEVC. The multiple intra-prediction modes can include, for example, DC prediction mode, horizontal prediction mode, vertical prediction mode, and true motion prediction mode (which can also be referred to as TM_PRED). In one implementation of DC prediction mode, a single value using the average of the pixels in a row above a current block and a column to the left of the current block can be used to predict the current block. In one implementation of horizontal prediction, each column of a current block can be filled with a copy of a column to the left of the current block. In one implementation of vertical prediction, each row of a current block can be filled with a copy of a row above the current block. In one implementation of TrueMotion prediction, in addition to the row above the current block and the column to the left of the current block, TM_PRED uses the pixel P above and to the left of the block. Horizontal differences between pixels in the row above the current block (starting from P) are propagated using the pixels from the column to the left of the current block to start each row. Other intra-prediction modes can include object-based prediction modes, such as the object-based prediction modes shown in
The prediction mode can also be selected from one of multiple inter-prediction modes including, for example, golden frame prediction mode, last frame prediction mode, alternative reference frame prediction mode, or any other prediction mode using any reference frame in an encoding scheme. In one implementation of the last frame prediction mode, the current block can be predicted by using the blocks in the immediate previous frame. In one implementation of the golden frame prediction mode, the current block can be predicted by using blocks in a golden frame selected from an arbitrarily distance past of the video stream. The golden frame is usually coded at a higher than average quality. In one implementation of the alternative reference frame prediction mode, an alternative reference frame constructed from multiple source frames of the video data can be used to predict the current block. When an inter-prediction mode is selected, a motion vector can also be encoded, which describes the position of the prediction block relative to the current block (e.g., offsets of the coordinates).
Next, still referring to
Quantization stage 76 converts the transform coefficients into discrete quantum values, which are referred to as quantized transform coefficients, using a quantizer value or quantization levels. The quantized transform coefficients are then entropy encoded by entropy encoding stage 78. The entropy-encoded coefficients, together with other information used to decode the block, which can include, for example, the type of prediction used, motion vectors, and a quantization value, are then output to compressed bitstream 88. Compressed bitstream 88 can be formatted using various techniques, such as variable length encoding (VLC) and arithmetic coding. Compressed bitstream 88 can also be referred to as an encoded video stream and the terms will be used interchangeably herein.
The reconstruction path in
Other variations of encoder 70 can be used to encode compressed bitstream 88. For example, a non-transform based encoder 70 can quantize the residual block directly without transform stage 74. In another implementation, an encoder 70 can have quantization stage 76 and dequantization stage 80 combined into a single stage.
Decoder 100, similar to the reconstruction path of encoder 70 discussed above, includes in one example the following stages to perform various functions to produce an output video stream 116 from compressed bitstream 88: an entropy decoding stage 102, a dequantization stage 104, an inverse transform stage 106, an intra/inter-prediction stage 108, a reconstruction stage 110, a loop filtering stage 112, and a deblocking filtering stage 114. Other structural variations of decoder 100 can be used to decode compressed bitstream 88.
When compressed bitstream 88 is presented for decoding, the data elements within compressed bitstream 88 can be decoded by the entropy decoding stage 102 (using, for example, Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Decoding) to produce a set of quantized transform coefficients. Dequantization stage 104 dequantizes the quantized transform coefficients, and inverse transform stage 106 inverse transforms the dequantized transform coefficients to produce a derivative residual that can be identical to that created by inverse transform stage 82 in encoder 70. Using header information decoded from compressed bitstream 88, decoder 100 can use intra/inter-prediction stage 108 to create the same prediction block as was created in encoder 70, e.g., at intra/inter-prediction stage 72. At reconstruction stage 110, the prediction block can be added to the derivative residual to create a reconstructed block. Loop filtering stage 112 can be applied to the reconstructed block to reduce blocking artifacts. Deblocking filtering stage 114 can be applied to the reconstructed block to reduce blocking distortion. Output video stream 116 can also be referred to as a decoded video stream and the terms will be used interchangeably herein.
Other variations of decoder 100 can be used to decode compressed bitstream 88. For example, decoder 100 can produce output video stream 116 without deblocking filtering stage 114.
Implementations of method of operation 500 can include identifying a frame of video data including a current block at 502, segmenting the current block into a first portion and a second portion at 504, generating predicted values for at least some of the pixels in the first portion using a first intra-prediction mode at 506, generating predicted values for at least some of the pixels in the second portion using a second intra-prediction mode at 508, and encoding the current block using the predicted values at 510.
A portion, such as a current block, of an input video signal, such as input video stream 50 shown in
The current block can be segmented into portions (objects) based on correlation between pixel values at 504. For example, the current block may be segmented into a first portion including a first set of correlated pixels and a second portion including a second set of correlated pixels. Each portion can have any shape or form, such as an L-shape, an inverse L-shape, a rectangular shape, a square shape, a diagonal shape, a triangular shape, or any other shape capable of including correlated pixel data.
In some implementations, the segmentation may correspond with objects captured in the video scene. For example, the video scene may capture a picture frame hanging on a wall. The current block may include a corner of the picture frame and part of the wall. The current block may be segmented into a first portion, which may be an L-shape portion, corresponding to the corner of the picture frame, and a second portion, which may be a square portion, corresponding to the wall. Although
Predicted values for at least some of the pixels in the first portion may be generated using a first intra-prediction mode at 506, and predicted values for at least some of the pixels in the second portion may be generated using a second intra-prediction mode at 508. Generating predicted values may include identifying a prediction mode for each respective portion. The prediction modes may be identified to efficiently predict the pixels in the respective portion. For example, a prediction mode for a portion may be identified to minimize coding bits in a residual block. The prediction modes may be identified independently. For example, the first intra-prediction mode may be an object-based prediction mode, such as the object-based prediction modes shown in
In some implementations, more than one prediction mode may be used to predict a portion. For example, the first portion may be an L-shaped portion, some pixels in the first portion may be predicted using horizontal prediction and other pixels in the first portion may be predicted using vertical prediction.
In some implementations, the first and second intra-prediction modes can be combined into a combined prediction mode. For example, as shown in
The current block can be encoded using the predicted values at 510. Encoding the current block can include generating a prediction block based on the predicted values associated with the first portion and the predicted values associated with the second portion, and generating a residual block based on the current block and the prediction block. The residual block can be transformed, quantized, entropy coded, and can be included in an encoded video stream.
Other implementations of method of operation 500 as shown in
Dblk=[Dblk(i,j)], i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 1]
A prediction block of the current block can be represented by a 4×4 matrix Pblk, such that Pblk(i,j) indicates the predicted pixel value for data element (i,j), and may be expressed as the following:
Pblk=[Pblk(i,j)], i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 2]
A residual block can be represented by a 4x4 residual error matrix Rblk such that Rblk(i,j) indicates the residual error value for data element (i,j), and may be expressed as the following as the following:
Rblk=[Rblk(i,j)]=[Dblk(i,j)−Pblk(i,j)], i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3; [Equation 3]
The residual error value may indicate a difference of pixel values between the current block Dblk(i,j) and the prediction block Pblk(i,j).
In some encoding schemes, such as the schemes that use raster scanned coding, data available for use during intra-prediction can include data in prior-coded blocks in the frame. The prior-coded blocks used for intra-prediction can include, for example, blocks in rows above the current block and blocks to the left of the current block in the same row. For simplicity,
An array T of 8 pixels can represent the data in a row immediately above the current block, and can be expressed as T=[Ti], i=0,1, . . . 7. An array L of 4 pixels can represent the data in a column immediately left of the current block and can be expressed as L=[Lj], j=0,1,2,3.
The pixel above and to the left of the current block may be referred to as Dtlc. Data in array T, array L, and Dtlc can be used for intra-prediction of the current block represented by matrix Dblk.
As shown in
Pblk(0,j)=Lj, j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,3)=L3, i=1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=1,2,3; j=0,1,2. [Equation 4]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1, j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=2,3, j=2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=2,3; j=0,1. [Equation 5]
As shown in
Pblk(i,0)=Ti, j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(3,j)=T3, j=1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1,2; j=1,2,3. [Equation 6]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1;
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=2,3, j=2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1; j=2,3. [Equation 7]
As shown in
Pblk(i,0)=Ti, i=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(0,j)=Lj, j=1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=(T6+T7)/2, i=1,2,3; j=1,2,3. [Equation 8]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1; j=2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=(T6+T7)/2, 1=2,3; j=2,3. [Equation 9]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=(Ti+Lj)/2, i=0,1,2; j=0,1,2;
Pblk(3,j)=T3, j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,3)=L3, i=0,1,2. [Equation 10]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=(Ti+Lj)/2, i=0,1; j=0,1;
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=2,3; j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1; j=2,3. [Equation 11]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 12]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(0,j)=Lj, j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 13]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Ti, i=2,3; j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 14]
As shown in
Pblk(3,j)=T3, j=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1,2; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 15]
As shown in
Pblk(i,j)=Lj, i=0,1,2,3; j=0,1,2,3. [Equation 16]
As shown in
Pblk(x,x)=Dtlc, x=0,1,2,3;
Pblk(x+1,x)=T0, x=0,1,2;
Pblk(x+2,x)=T1, x=0,1;
Pblk((x+3,x)=T2, x=0;
Pblk(x,x+1)=L0, x=0,1,2;
Pblk(x,x+2)=L1, x=0,1;
Pblk((x,x+3)=L2, x=0. [Equation 17]
As shown in
Pblk(0,0)=(T1+L1)/2;
Pblk(x,0)=T(x+1), x=1,2,3;
Pblk(0,y)=L(y+1), y=1,2;
Pblk(1,1)=(T3+L3)/2;
Pblk(3,1)=Pblk(2,2)=Pblk(1,3)=T5;
Pblk(3,2)=Pblk(2,3)=T6;
Pblk(3,3)=T7. [Equation 18]
The pixels along the diagonal may be predicted using a weighted average of pixels in the row above the current block and a predicted pixel below LP4 below and to the left of the current block. The predicted pixel LP4 may be an estimate of an unencoded (or unscanned) pixel to the left of and below the bottom right corner of the current block, and may be expressed as the following:
LP4=L3+(L3−L2). [Equation 19]
Although a pixel to the left of the current block, such as L3, may be used for predicting the pixels on the diagonal, using LP4 may produce more accurate predictions. Accordingly, predicting the pixels along the diagonal of the current block can be expressed as the following:
Pblk(3,0)=T4;
Pblk(2,1)=0.25*LP4+0.75*T4;
Pblk(1,2)=0.5*LP4+0.5*T4;
Pblk(0,3)=0.75*LP4+0.25*T4. [Equation 20]
As shown in
Pblk(0,0)=(T1+L1)/2;
Pblk(x,0)=T(x+1), x=1,2,3;
Pblk(0,y)=L(y+1), y=1,2;
Pblk(0,3)=Pblk(1,2)=Pblk(2,1)=(2*L3−L2+T4)/2;
Pblk(1,1)=(T3+L3)/2.
Pblk(3,1)=Pblk(2,0);
Pblk(2,2)=Pblk(1,1);
Pblk(1,3)=Pblk(0,2);
Pblk(3,2)=Pblk(1,0);
Pblk(2,3)=Pblk(0,1);
Pblk(3,3)=Pblk(0,0). [Equation 21]
Implementations of method of operation 2300 can include receiving an encoded video stream at 2302, identifying an encoded frame at 2304, identifying an encoded current block in the encoded frame at 2306, decoding the encoded current block using at least a first and a second intra-prediction mode at 2308, and reconstructing a frame at 2310.
An encoded video data, such as compressed bitstream 88 shown in
An encoded frame can be identified in the encoded video data at 2304. The term “identify” includes select, construct, determine, specify, or otherwise identify in any manner whatsoever.
An encoded current block can be identified from the encoded frame at 2306. The encoded current block can be, for example, a block encoded using any of the prediction modes described above, such as a directional intra-prediction mode, an object-based intra-prediction mode, or a combination of directional and object-based intra-prediction modes. The current block may include a first portion encoded using a first intra-prediction mode, and a second portion encoded using a second intra-prediction mode.
A decoded current block can be generated at 2308. For example, generating a decoded current block can include decoding the encoded current block include using a first intra-prediction mode and a second intra-prediction mode. In some implementations, the encoded current block may be encoded using combined prediction mode.
Decoding the encoded current block may be similar to encoding the current block as described above. For example, decoding the encoded current block can include identifying the first portion and the second portion of the encoded current block, identifying the first intra-prediction mode and the second intra-prediction mode, and using the identified intra-prediction modes to predict pixels in the decoded current block.
A frame can be reconstructed based on the decoded current block at 2310. The frame can be reconstructed from the decoded current block using decoding stages such as reconstruction stage 110, loop filtering stage 112, and deblocking filtering stage 114 shown in
Method of operation 2300 is depicted and described as a series of steps. However, steps in accordance with this disclosure can occur in various orders and/or concurrently. Additionally, steps in accordance with this disclosure may occur with other steps not presented and described herein. Furthermore, not all illustrated steps may be required to implement a method in accordance with the disclosed subject matter.
The implementations or implementations of encoding and decoding described above illustrate some exemplary encoding and decoding techniques. However, it is to be understood that encoding and decoding, as those terms are used in the claims, could mean compression, decompression, transformation, or any other processing or change of data.
The words “example” or “exemplary” are used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “example′ or “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Rather, use of the words “example” or “exemplary” is intended to present concepts in a concrete fashion. As used in this application, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from context, “X includes A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X includes A; X includes B; or X includes both A and B, then “X includes A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form. Moreover, use of the term “an implementation” or “one implementation” or “an implementation” or “one implementation” throughout is not intended to mean the same implementation or implementation unless described as such.
A computing device implementing the techniques disclosed herein (and the algorithms, methods, instructions, etc. stored thereon and/or executed thereby) can be realized in hardware, software, or any combination thereof including, for example, IP cores, ASICS, programmable logic arrays, optical processors, programmable logic controllers, microcode, microcontrollers, servers, microprocessors, digital signal processors or any other suitable circuit or other information processing device, now existing or hereafter developed. In the claims, the term “processor” should be understood as encompassing any of the foregoing hardware, either singly or in combination. The terms “signal” and “data” are used interchangeably.
Further, in some implementations, for example, the techniques described herein can be implemented using a general purpose computer/processor with a computer program that, when executed, carries out any of the respective methods, algorithms and/or instructions described herein. In addition or alternatively, for example, a special purpose computer/processor can be utilized which can contain specialized hardware for carrying out any of the methods, algorithms, or instructions described herein.
In some implementations, transmitting station 12 and receiving stations 30, 40 can, for example, be implemented on computers in a screencasting system. Alternatively, transmitting station 12 can be implemented on a server and receiving station 30 or 40 can be implemented on a device separate from the server, such as a hand-held communications device (i.e. a cell phone). In this instance, transmitting station 12 can encode content using an encoder 70 into an encoded video signal and transmit the encoded video signal to the communications device. In turn, the communications device can then decode the encoded video signal using a decoder 100. Alternatively, the communications device can decode content stored locally on the communications device, i.e. content that was not transmitted by transmitting station 12. Other suitable transmitting station 12 and receiving stations 30, 40 implementation schemes are available. For example, receiving station 30 or 40 can be a generally stationary personal computer rather than a portable communications device and/or a device including an encoder 70 may also include a decoder 100.
Further, all or a portion of implementations of the present invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from, for example, a computer-usable or computer-readable medium. A computer-usable or computer-readable medium can be any device that can, for example, tangibly contain, store, communicate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with any processor. The medium can be, for example, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, or a semiconductor device. Other suitable mediums are also available.
The above-described embodiments, implementations and aspects have been described in order to allow easy understanding of the present invention and do not limit the present invention. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structure as is permitted under the law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4924310 | von Brandt | May 1990 | A |
5148269 | de Haan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150209 | Baker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5337086 | Fujinami | Aug 1994 | A |
5398068 | Liu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5469273 | Demura | Nov 1995 | A |
5510842 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512952 | Iwamura | Apr 1996 | A |
5532744 | Akiwumi-Assani et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5617541 | Albanese et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5708473 | Mead | Jan 1998 | A |
5731840 | Kikuchi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761423 | Lee | Jun 1998 | A |
5767987 | Wolff et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818967 | Bhattacharjee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886652 | Adachi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886742 | Hibi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916449 | Ellwart et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930387 | Chan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5956467 | Rabbani et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991428 | Taniguchi | Nov 1999 | A |
5991447 | Eifrig et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005625 | Yokoyama | Dec 1999 | A |
6005980 | Eifrig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044166 | Bassman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058211 | Bormans et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104751 | Artieri | Aug 2000 | A |
6108383 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157326 | Van Der Vleuten et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173012 | Katta et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208765 | Bergen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212235 | Nieweglowski et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256423 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272179 | Kadono | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285804 | Crinon et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289049 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292837 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314208 | Konstantinides et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349154 | Kleihorst | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359929 | Boon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381277 | Chun et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6434197 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473460 | Topper | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6542541 | Luna et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574273 | Luna et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600786 | Prakash et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611620 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628845 | Stone et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650704 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654418 | Haskell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654419 | Sriram et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6687303 | Ishihara | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711209 | Lainema et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735249 | Karczewicz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6775326 | Sekiguchi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778553 | Chou | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6907079 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7116830 | Srinivasan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7158681 | Persiantsev | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173968 | Kutka et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184482 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197070 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7218674 | Kuo | May 2007 | B2 |
7253831 | Gu | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263125 | Lainema | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7333544 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7466774 | Boyce | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7602851 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602997 | Young | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7672377 | Heng et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689051 | Mukerjee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711052 | Hannuksela et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715475 | Puri et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7773670 | Puri et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7924918 | Lelescu et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8000546 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8094722 | Wang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8111914 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135064 | Tasaka et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8208545 | Seo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8320470 | Huang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8369402 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8503528 | Grange et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8559512 | Paz | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8885956 | Sato | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020009153 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017565 | Ju et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026639 | Haneda | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031272 | Bagni et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020071485 | Caglar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020176502 | Rose et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181790 | Nakata | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035484 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030138045 | Murdock et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030202705 | Sun | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215018 | MacInnis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215135 | Caron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040001634 | Mehrotra | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040156437 | Lainema | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040234144 | Sugimoto et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252886 | Pan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050180500 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050220352 | Wemelsfelder | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265447 | Park | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276323 | Martemyanov et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060056689 | Wittebrood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072664 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093038 | Boyce | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098738 | Cosman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153304 | Prakash et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203916 | Chandramouly et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215751 | Reichel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060251330 | Toth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285589 | Hannuksela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025441 | Ugur et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036354 | Wee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070080971 | Sung | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121100 | Divo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070177673 | Yang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216777 | Quan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217508 | Shimada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217701 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070274385 | He | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274388 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080069440 | Forutanpour | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080152007 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170615 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181299 | Tian et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187053 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212678 | Booth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239354 | Usui | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260042 | Shah et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294962 | Goel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310745 | Ye et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090161763 | Rossignol et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090190659 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196342 | Divorra Escoda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090232401 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257492 | Andersson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100021009 | Yao | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023979 | Patel et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034265 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034268 | Kusakabe | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061444 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074332 | Karczewicz et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086028 | Tanizawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098169 | Budagavi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100104021 | Schmit | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111182 | Karczewicz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118943 | Shiodera | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118945 | Wada et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128796 | Choudhury | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142761 | Venkatapuram et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195715 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100278234 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100329334 | Kim et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329341 | Kam et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002541 | Varekamp | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007977 | Amonou et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026591 | Bauza et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033125 | Shiraishi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069890 | Besley | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110158529 | Malik | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110211757 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235706 | Demircin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243225 | Min et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243229 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243230 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249741 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249743 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255592 | Sung et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264676 | Belan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268359 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293001 | Lim et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014436 | Segall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014437 | Segall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014438 | Segall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014439 | Segall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014440 | Segall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014444 | Min et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020408 | Chen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039388 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057630 | Saxena et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082220 | Mazurenko et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106637 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120106646 | Cammas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114035 | Nakagomi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114039 | Wang | May 2012 | A1 |
20120201475 | Carmel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120278433 | Liu et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287998 | Sato | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307884 | MacInnis | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314942 | Williams et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130027230 | Marpe et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0634873 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1903698 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2007267414 | Oct 2007 | JP |
WO02093488 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2005094083 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2010149900 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cicconi et al., “Efficient Region-Based Motion Estimation and Symmetry Oriented Segmentation for Image Sequence Coding,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 4, No. 3, Jun. 1994, pp. 357-364. |
Salembier et al., “Segmentation-Based Video Coding system Allowing the Manipulation of Objects,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 7, No. 1, Feb. 1997, pp. 60-74. |
Zhang, Kui, et al.; “Variable Block Size Video Coding With Motion Prediction and Motion Segmentation”, SPIE vol. 2419, 1995, 9 pp. |
Chen, Michael C., et al.; “Design and Optimization of a Differentially Coded Variable Block Size Motion Compensation System”, IEEE 1996, 4 pp. |
Chen, Xing C., et al.; “Quadtree Based Adaptive Lossy Coding of Motion Vectors”, IEEE 1996, 4 pp. |
Chung R H Y et al. “Efficient Block-Based Motion Segmentation Method using Motion Vector Consistency”; Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Machine Vision Application: Tsukuba Science City, Japan; May 16-18, 2005. |
Ebrahimi T Ed—Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: “A new technique for motion field segmentation and coding for very low bitrate video coding applications”; Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); Austin, Nov. 13-16, 1994. |
Glaser-Garrett, Jason, “A novel macroblock-tree algorithm for high-performance optimization of dependent video coding in H.264/AVC”, Department of Computer Science, Harvey Mudd College, Date Unknown, 12 pp. |
Guillotel, Philippe, et al.; “Comparison of motion vector coding techniques”, SPIE vol. 2308, 1994, 11 pp. |
Han et al., “Jointly Optimized Spatial Prediction and Block Transform for Video and Image Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 4 (Apr. 2012). |
Han et al., “Toward Jointly Optimal Spatial Prediction and Adaptive Transform in Video/Image Coding,” ICASSP 2010 (Dallas, TX, Mar. 14-19, 2010). |
Karczewicz, Maria, et al.; “Video Coding Using Motion Compensation With Polynomial Motion Vector Fields”, IEEE COMSOC EURASIP, First International Workshop on Wireless Image/Video Communications—Sep. 1996, 6 pp. |
Kim, Jong Won, et al.; “On the Hierarchical Variable Block Size Motion Estimation Technique for Motion Sequence Coding”, SPIE Visual Communication and Image Processing 1993, Cambridge, MA, Nov. 8, 1993, 29 pp. |
Liu, Bede, et al.; “A simple method to segment motion field for video coding”, SPIE vol. 1818, Visual Communications and Image Processing 1992, 10 pp. |
Liu, Bede, et al.; “New Fast Algorithms for the Estimation of Block Motion Vectors”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 1993, 10 pp. |
Luttrell, Max, et al.; “Simulation Results for Modified Error Resilient Syntax With Data Partitioning and RVLC”, ITU-Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Study Group 16, Video Coding Experts Group (Question 15), Sixth Meeting: Seoul, South Korea, Nov. 2, 1998, 34 pp. |
Martin, Graham R., et al.; “Reduced Entropy Motion Compensation Using Variable Sized Blocks”, SPIE vol. 3024, 1997, 10 pp. |
Nicolas, H., et al.; “Region-based motion estimation using deterministic relaxation schemes for image sequence coding”, IEEE 1992, 4 pp. |
Nokia, Inc., Nokia Research Center, “MVC Decoder Description”, Telecommunication Standardization Sector, Study Period 1997-2000, Geneva, Feb. 7, 2000, 99 pp. |
Orchard, Michael T.; “Exploiting Scene Structure in Video Coding”, IEEE 1991, 5 pp. |
Orchard, Michael T.; “Predictive Motion-Field Segmentation for Image Sequence Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 1, Feb. 1993, 17 pp. |
Park, Jun Sung, et al., “Selective Intra Prediction Mode Decision for H.264/AVC Encoders”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 13, (2006). |
Schiller, H., et al.; “Efficient Coding of Side Information in a Low Bitrate Hybrid Image Coder”, Signal Processing 19 (1990) Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 61-73, 13 pp. |
Schuster, Guido M., et al.; “A Video Compression Scheme With Optimal Bit Allocation Among Segmentation, Motion, and Residual Error”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 6, No. 11, Nov. 1997, 16 pp. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video, Video coding for low bit rate communication, International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T Recommendation H.263, Feb. 1998, 167 pp. |
Steliaros, Michael K., et al.; “Locally-accurate motion estimation for object-based video coding”, SPIE vol. 3309, 1997, 11 pp. |
Stiller, Christoph; “Motion-Estimation for Coding of Moving Video at 8 kbit/s with Gibbs Modeled Vectorfield Smoothing”, SPIE vol. 1360 Visual Communications and Image Processing 1990, 9 pp. |
Strobach, Peter; “Tree-Structured Scene Adaptive Coder”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, No. 4, Apr. 1990, 10 pp. |
Wiegand, Thomas, et al.; “Long-Term Memory Motion-Compensated Prediction”, Publication Unknown, Date Unknown, 15 pp. |
Wiegand, Thomas, et al.; “Rate-Distortion Optimized Mode Selection for Very Low Bit Rate Video Coding and the Emerging H.263 Standard”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 6, No. 2, Apr. 1996, 9 pp. |
Wright, R. Glenn, et al.; “Multimedia—Electronic Technical Manual for ATE”, IEEE 1996, 3 pp. |
Su M—T Sun University of Washington et al. “Encoder Optimization for H.264/AVC Fidelity Range Extensions” Jul. 12, 2005. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services”. H.264. Version 1. International Telecommunication Union. Dated May 2003. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services”. H.264. Version 3. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Mar. 2005. |
“Overview; VP7 Data Format and Decoder”. Version 1.5. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Mar. 28, 2005. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services”. H.264. Amendment 1: Support of additional colour spaces and removal of the High 4:4:4 Profile. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Jun. 2006. |
“VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification”. Version 1.02. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Aug. 17, 2006. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video”. H.264. Amendment 2: New profiles for professional applications. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Apr. 2007. |
“VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification”. Version 1.03. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video”. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. Version 8. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Nov. 1, 2007. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video”. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 11. Dated Mar. 2009. |
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video”. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Mar. 2010. |
“Implementors' Guide; Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Coding of moving video: Implementors Guide for H.264: Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services”. H.264. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Jul. 30, 2010. |
“VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide”. WebM Project. Google On2. Dated: Dec. 1, 2010. |
Bankoski et al. “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide; draft-bankoski-vp8-bitstream-02” Network Working Group. Dated May 18, 2011. |
Bankoski et al. “Technical Overview of VP8, an Open Source Video CODEC for the Web”. Dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Bankoski, J., Koleszar, J., Quillio, L., Salonen, J., Wilkins, P., and Y. Xu, “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide”, RFC 6386, Nov. 2011. |
Mozilla, “Introduction to Video Coding Part 1: Transform Coding”, Video Compression Overview, Mar. 2012, 171 pp. |
Pan et al., “Fast mode decision algorithms for inter/intra prediction in H.264 video coding.” Advances in Multimedia nformation Processing PCM 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. pp. 158-167. |
Kim et al., “Fast H.264 intra-prediction mode selection using joint spatial and transform domain features.” Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 17.2, 2006, pp. 291-310. |