This invention relates to a method for calculation of a fatality probability distribution in flight tests, caused by rogue missiles of atypical trajectories, by using falls map from Monte-Carlo simulation runs. The fatality distribution is used for Weapon Danger Area (WDA) determination. The WDA is difficult to map, because its boundary is usually situated in sparse falls regions with limited falls data. This invention presents a method to overcome the problem of fatality probability calculation in sparse falls areas, by iterative grid size optimization and confidence correction approach.
Safety is a major consideration when testing weapons, particularly airborne weapons such as missiles or the like. Since there are obvious limitations to the area that can be allocated for such tests, it is extremely important to be able to realistically predict which areas may be endangered by fragments falling as a result of any such tests. This prediction capability is highly important for the sake of the test plan and the test approval. Similar scenarios might occur under enemy attack situations in which weaponry has to be intercepted in the vicinity of populated areas, and therefore the intercepting point has high risk of causing damage on the ground. All the abovementioned missiles, weapons and other flying objects will also be termed hereinafter “flying object” for the sake of brevity. Also, the terms “fragment” and “debris” will be used interchangeably in the description to follow.
It is therefore crucial to have a reliable prediction tool for the rogue missiles and interception debris trajectories, to effectively map the flying objects falls density, in as many scenarios as possible. This map is usually generated by performing numerous runs of Monte-Carlo simulations for objects with random faults and counting the falls in discrete grid cells. It is challenging to obtain a reliable evaluation of the fatality probability in sparse falls areas, especially in the WDA boundary region, because of the high sensitivity of falls distribution in this area to grid cells size. Furthermore, current methods for determining far tails by extrapolation are unreliable, and no predetermined method exists for doing this accurately since the distribution type is often unknown.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a method for creating a dedicated optimal local grid around a place of interest, comprising:
In one embodiment of the invention, the statistical constraints refer to a minimal fatality probability value (FP).
In some cases, the predefined threshold cannot be achieved due to an insufficient number of runs. In these cases, the procedure will involve additional methods to try and converge, for example by increasing the number of runs.
Furthermore, in some cases reaching the predefined threshold is not feasible, which means that the test plan should be changed or even canceled. Alternatively, if the predefined threshold cannot be met, the iterative process is discontinued and restarted using a different predefined threshold.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the input to the local grid size optimization procedure includes falls distribution data from flight test(s) or Monte-Carlo simulation(s). In some embodiments, the statistical constraints include a fatality probability evaluation. In specific embodiments of the invention, the fatality probability evaluation relates to rogue missiles or other flying objects or fragments originating from flying objects.
Typically, the local grid structure is selected from among a rectangular lattice, a circular grid, or a free-shape grid. Embodiments of the invention comprise correcting the number of falls in each grid cell to reach a required confidence level. Other embodiments of the invention comprise computing a tight upper bound of fatality probability for sparse falls areas.
In the context of this invention, fatality, herein, generally relates to any damage (direct or indirect) to living beings or infrastructure.
Computing the fatality probability requires knowledge of a ‘falls map’ of rogue missiles, fragments, and debris (i.e., those with anomalous flight paths). When dealing with weapons testing and other preplanned activities involving fragments of debris, this map is usually generated by performing numerous runs of Monte-Carlo simulations of flying objects containing random faults and subsequently counting the falls in discrete grid cells. Typically, a ground impact probability density distribution and directly related fatality probability distribution are generated and mapped.
No analytical distribution function for the falls' density can be assumed in advance in a real-world scenario, especially in sparse fall areas (i.e., where few or even zero flying objects are predicted to fall). Reliably evaluating the fatality probability distribution in sparse falls areas in the WDA boundary region is challenging for the following reasons:
The present invention accounts for sparse falls areas, whereby the grid elements within those areas are iteratively enlarged and recalculated for fatality probability (including correction for confidence level) until some minimum or steady value of fatality probability is reached.
The fatality probability value (FP) computed by this method will be compared to an acceptable fatality level, as set by authorities or safety standards.
The present invention has the advantage of being able to:
The falls density iterated sampling process operates as follows (see
This method of grid enlargement results in an upper bound for the density value.
Examples for such optimization procedure for empirical falls map and for synthetic normal distribution falls map are provided in
The steps of the process according to one embodiment of the invention are as follows:
The process according to the invention corrects the number of falls in each grid cell for a given Confidence Level parameter. The correction takes into account the fact that the specific Monte-Carlo set that is used in the computation does not cover all possible sets (with different random initial seeds). The correction is done using a Binomial distribution, meaning that an unknown probability parameter of a rogue missile to fall in a specific square is estimated using Bernoulli sampling. The Binomial distribution function (bn) and Binomial cumulative function (Bn) are expressed as follows:
The falls ratio (n/N), corrected for Confidence Level (C), is defined as:
p is computed such that, for a given n, N and C it fulfils the following condition:
The statistically corrected number of falls in each cell is computed straightforwardly as:
The confidence level correction is significant for small (n/N) ratios.
For example for (n/N)=0, and a required Confidence Level of 90% (C=0.9)→p=(n/N)c=2.3/N. Explanation: for this case, the expression (5) reduces to (1−p)N=1−C→In(1−p)=In(1−C)/N, and we obtain the final result by using the first (dominant) term in the Taylor expansion of In(1−C). If a lower confidence level is used (e.g. 80%), then the fatality probability will decrease to p=1.6/N.
All the above description and examples have been provided for the purpose of illustration and are not intended to limit the invention in any way.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
284418 | Jun 2021 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2022/050485 | 5/10/2022 | WO |