Patent Grant
9782242
The present invention relates to metallic dental prostheses constructed of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys and methods of making such articles.
Metallic dental prostheses, such as crown and bridges, are each custom-made to replicate the impressions made for a specific tooth/teeth. Generally, metallic dental prostheses are made from various metals and alloys using an investment casting process. The materials are chosen for their ability to replicate the exact features of the impression during casting, and the ability to attain a high quality surface finish during the post-cast finishing process. In addition, the choice of dental material should have a high yield strength and sufficient hardness to endure the stresses created by chewing, and sufficient erosion/corrosion resistance to withstand the harsh chemical environment created by various foods, by the body, and by the environment. Finally, the material of choice should have a relatively low-coefficient of thermal expansion to be compatible with the tooth and other porcelain materials it is place in contact with.
The principal materials of choice for metallic dental prostheses are noble-metal based alloys, such as gold alloys, which are corrosion resistant and have better relative castability than conventional high strength materials. However, these noble-metal based alloys are expensive materials and generally do no have high yield strength and hardness. Other materials of choice, such as nickel-base alloys, are difficult to cast and do not sufficiently replicate the exact features of the intricate impressions.
Accordingly, there is a need for a new material for metallic dental prostheses, with high castability and replication characteristics, high yield strength and hardness, high corrosion resistance, and that are preferably relatively inexpensive.
The current invention is directed to metallic dental prostheses made of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys wherein the dental prosthesis has an elastic strain limit of around 1.8% or more, and methods of making such metallic dental prostheses.
In one embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is made of a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is made of a Zr/Ti base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy incorporating in-situ ductile crystalline precipitates.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is made of a Zr/Ti base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy incorporating no Nickel.
In still another preferred embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is made of a Zr/Ti base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy incorporating no Aluminum.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is made of a Zr/Ti base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy incorporating no Beryllium.
In another embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prostheses are comprised at least in part of another dental material.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is coated with a biocompatible polymethyl methacrylate resin cement. In such an embodiment the cement can be reinforced with selected oxides including alumina, magnesia, zirconia, or a combination of these oxides along with an application of a small amount of a metal primer agent.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is a casting of a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, metallic dental prosthesis is an investment casting of a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy.
In still yet another embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is a crown. In another embodiment of the invention, the metallic dental prosthesis is a bridge.
In still yet another embodiment the invention is directed to a method of forming a dental prosthesis of a bulk-solidifying alloy. In one such embodiment, a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is cast into a near-to-net shape dental prostheses. In a preferred embodiment of the invention a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is investment-cast into a near-to-net shape dental prostheses. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is cast into a near-to-net shape crown. In still another preferred embodiment of the invention, a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is investment-cast into a near-to-net shape crown. In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is cast into a near-to-net shape bridge. In still yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, a molten piece of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is investment-cast into a nearto-net shape bridge.
In another embodiment of the method of making dental prostheses, the bulk solidifying amorphous alloy composition has a critical cooling rate of 100° C./second or less and preferably 10° C./second or less.
In still another embodiment of the method of making dental prostheses, the provided bulk solidifying amorphous alloy composition is selected from the group consisting of: Zr/Ti base, Zr-base, Zr/Ti base with no Ni, Zr/Ti base with no Al, and Zr/Ti base with no Be.
In yet another embodiment of the method of making dental prostheses, a molten piece of the bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is cast into a dental prosthesis under either a partial vacuum or a vacuum.
In still yet another embodiment of the method of making dental prostheses, a molten piece of the bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy is fed into the mold by applying an external pressure such as an inert gas.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawing wherein:
The current invention is directed to metallic dental prostheses made of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys wherein the dental prosthesis has an elastic strain limit of around 1.8% or more, and methods of making such metallic dental prostheses.
Metallic dental prostheses, such as crowns and bridges, are each custom-made to replicate the impressions made for a specific tooth/teeth. In dental terminology, the crown is the visible part of tooth, which can be further covered by enamel to improve the aesthetics and durability of the prosthesis. Such a crown can be an artificial replacement for the visible part of a tooth that has decayed or been damaged. In such an embodiment, the crown is a restoration that covers, or caps, a tooth to restore it to its normal shape and size. However, the crown can also serve to strengthen or improve the appearance of a tooth. Finally, the crown can also be used to cover a dental implant.
In contrast, a bridge is a partial false tooth, or a set of one or more false teeth that act as a replacement for missing natural teeth. Such a bridge can be permanently anchored to natural teeth (fixed bridge) or set into a metal appliance and temporarily clipped onto natural teeth (removable bridge).
Bulk solidifying amorphous alloys are recently discovered family of amorphous alloys, which can be cooled at substantially lower cooling rates, of about 500 K/sec or less, and substantially retain their amorphous atomic structure. As such, these materials can be produced in thickness of 1.0 mm or more, substantially thicker than conventional amorphous alloys, which have typical thicknesses of 0.020 mm, and which require cooling rates of 105 K/sec or more. Exemplary bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy materials are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,288,344; 5,368,659; 5,618,359; and 5,735,975 (the disclosures of which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference).
One exemplary family of bulk solidifying amorphous alloys can be described as (Zr,Ti)a(Ni,Cu,Fe)b(Be,AI,Si,B)c, where a is in the range of from 30 to 75, b is in the range of from 5 to 60, and c in the range of from 0 to 50 in atomic percentages. Furthermore, these alloys can accommodate other transition metals, such as Nb, Cr, V, Co, in amounts up to 20% atomic and more.
A preferable alloy family is (Zr,Ti)a(Ni,Cu)b(Be)c, where a is in the range of from 40 to 75, b is in the range of from 5 to 50, and c in the range of from 5 to 50 in atomic percentages. Still, a more preferable composition is (Zr,Ti)a(Ni,Cu)b(Be)c, where a is in the range of from 45 to 65, b is in the range of from 7.5 to 35, and c in the range of from 10 to 37.5 in atomic percentages.
Another preferable alloy family is (Zr)a (Nb,Ti)b (Ni,Cu)c(Al)d, where a is in the range of from 45 to 65, b is in the range of from 0 to 10, c is in the range of from 20 to 40 and d in the range of from 7.5 to 15 in atomic percentages. Other elements, e.g. Y, Si, Sn, Sc etc. can also be added as micro-alloying additions to the composition of bulk solidifying amorphous alloys at fractions of atomic percentages in order to alleviate the effects of detrimental impurities such as oxygen and as such reduce the critical cooling rate.
These bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys can sustain strains up to 1.5% or more and generally around 1.8% without any permanent deformation or breakage. Further, they have high fracture toughness of 10 ksi-sqrt(in) (sqrt: square root) or more, and preferably 20 ksi sqrt(in) or more. Also, these materials have high hardness values of 4 GPa or more, and preferably 5.5 GPa or more. The yield strength of bulk solidifying alloys range from 1.6 GPa and reach up to 2 GPa and more exceeding the current state of the Titanium alloys.
Another set of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys are ferrous metals (Fe, Ni, Co) based compositions. Examples of such compositions are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,868; publications to (A. Inoue et. al., Appl. Phys. Left., Volume 71, p 464 (1997)) and (Shen et. al., Mater. Trans., JIM, Volume 42, p 2136 (2001)); and Japanese patent application 2000126277 (Publ. #.2001303218 A), all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
One exemplary composition of such alloys is Fe72Al5Ga2P11C6B4. Another exemplary composition of such alloys is Fe72Al7Zr10Mo5W2B15. Although, these alloy compositions are not processable to the degree of the above-cited Zr-base alloy systems, they can still be processed in thicknesses of around 1.0 mm or more, sufficient to be utilized in the current invention. Similarly, these materials have elastic strain limits higher than 1.2% and generally around 1.8%. The yield strength of these ferrous-based bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys is also higher than the Zr-based alloys, ranging from 2.5 GPa to 4 GPa, or more, making them particularly attractive for use in dental prostheses. Ferrous metal-base bulk amorphous alloys also very high yield hardness ranging from 7.5 GPa to 12 GPa.
In general, crystalline precipitates in bulk amorphous alloys are highly detrimental to the properties of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys, especially to the toughness and strength of these materials, and, as such, such precipitates are generally kept to as small a volume fraction as possible. However, there are cases in which ductile crystalline phases precipitate in-situ during the processing of bulk amorphous alloys and are indeed beneficial to the properties of bulk amorphous alloys, and especially to the toughness and ductility of the materials. Such bulk amorphous alloys comprising such beneficial precipitates are also included in the current invention. One exemplary material is disclosed in (C. C. Hays et. al, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 84, p 2901, 2000), which is incorporated herein by reference. This alloy has a low elastic modulus of from 70 GPa to 80 GPa depending on the specific microstructure of ductile-crystalline precipitates. Further, the elastic strain limit is 1.8% or more and the yield strength is 1.4 GPa and more.
Although generally the current invention is directed to improved metallic dental prostheses, Applicants have found that dental prostheses constructed of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys show a number of improved properties. First, as described above, bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys have the high hardness and toughness properties associated with conventional materials. The bulk solidifying amorphous alloys also have excellent corrosion resistance, as required for any material exposed to the harsh conditions to which dental prostheses are subjected. However, these bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys also have some general characteristics which make bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys uniquely suited as a new class of material for the use and application in metallic dental prostheses.
Bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys have very high elastic strain limits, or the ability to sustain strains without permanent deformation, typically around 1.8% or higher. Although Applicant's have discovered that this is an important characteristic for dental prostheses because a high elastic limit helps to sustain global and local loading with minimal or no permanent deformation of the metallic dental prostheses, this characteristic is absent in conventional metallic dental materials. For example, conventional metals and alloys typically used in dental prostheses have typical elastic strain limits below 0.8%. Accordingly, dental prosthesis made of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys having an elastic strain limit of 1.5% or higher, and preferably 1.8% or higher is desired.
The elastic limit of a material is also critical because metallic dental prostheses, such as the crowns and bridges discussed above, have highly intricate shapes and features, which must remain intact upon any mechanical loading both during preparation and in use. For example, because of the need to fit the crown and/or bridge as close to the tooth as possible, generally these prostheses have thin-walled shells as part of their overall shape and design. A material having a high elastic strain limit helps to keep both the general shape and intricate details of the metallic dental prostheses intact. In the case of conventional metals and alloys with much lower elastic strain limit, the use of thicker shells and larger structures are needed to sustain mechanical loading, as well as to maintain the integrity of the intricate details of the impression. Both thicker shells and larger structures are highly undesirable due to the increased operational and surgical complications. In addition, in some cases, these thicker shells and larger structures require that a larger section of the healthy tooth or teeth be cut away during operation in order to accommodate the crown or bridge in the patient.
Secondly, bulk solidifying amorphous alloys can be readily cast from the molten state to replicate the very details of impression prepared for dental prosthesis. Indeed, Applicants have discovered that the low melting temperatures of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys provide a relatively easier casting operation such as reduced or minimal reaction with molds or investment shells. Further, the lack of any first-order phase transformation during the solidification of the bulk solidifying amorphous alloy reduces solidification shrinkage and as such provides a near-to-net shape configuration of the metallic dental prosthesis. The solidification shrinkage is then dominated by the coefficient of thermal expansion rather than the volume difference between the solid and liquid state of the casting alloy. Accordingly, bulk amorphous alloys with low coefficient thermal expansion (at temperatures from ambient to glass transition) are preferred.
For example, Zr-base bulk solidifying amorphous alloys have generally a coefficient of thermal expansion of around 10−5 (m/m ° C.) providing low shrinkage rates. This is extremely important in the production of metallic dental prostheses since many of the intricate portions of the impressions can be lost if significant post-cast processing is required. In addition, bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys keep their fluidity to exceptionally low temperatures, such as down to the glass transition temperature, compared to other dental casting materials, and especially those materials which exhibit the necessary yield strengths for use in metallic dental prosthesis applications. Accordingly, bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys with glass transition temperatures lower than 400° C., and most preferably lower than 300° C. are preferred. For example, Zr—Ti base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys have typical glass transition temperatures in the range of 320° C. to 450° C. depending on the alloy composition.
Applicants have discovered that these characteristics combined with the lack of any microstructure allow bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys to replicate the intricacies of the impressions in a dental casting with exceptional quality. The casting characteristics of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys not only reduce the post-cast finishing processes, but also provide a better surface finish and preparation due to reduced or minimal defects arising from the initial casting operation. For example, a dental prosthesis constructed of a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy can be given a very high polish and surface smoothness which helps to hinder bacteria growth in the mouth. Further, the high polish and other surface smoothness characteristics can be desirable from an aesthetic perspective as well.
While the above discussion has focused primarily on the high elastic limit and castability properties of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys, it should be understood that it is the unique combination of properties that makes these materials particularly suitable for use in metallic dental prostheses. For example the bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys described herein exhibit a very high hardness of 4.0 GPa or more leading to improved wear resistance, and inert properties which leads to improved corrosion resistance over conventional materials. For example, Zr-base bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys have hardness values ranging from 4.0 GPa up to 6.0 GPa. In addition, the yield strength of the bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys is exceptionally high, especially compared to the crystalline alloys of their base metals (e.g., Zr/Ti base amorphous alloys have typical yield strengths on the order of 1.5 to 2.0 GPa). Such properties, a hardness value of greater than 4.0 GPa and preferably more than 5.0 GPa, along with the very high elastic strain limit of 1.2%, preferably 1.5%, and most preferably 1.8% or higher, makes metallic dental prostheses of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys highly durable. Moreover, because of the excellent castability of these materials the desired mechanical and physical properties of bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys are readily obtained in an as-cast condition. This is generally not true for conventional metals and alloys which are often not available at all as castings.
Although the above discussion has focused solely on choosing a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy material based on certain advantageous physical properties, the bulk solidifying amorphous alloy composition can also be preferably selected to be free of Ni or Al or Be in order to address the high sensitivity or allergic reactions of specific population groups to such metals.
The invention is also directed to a method of manufacturing the metallic dental prostheses of the invention. Principally the bulk-solidifying amorphous alloys are fabricated by various casting methods. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, as shown in
The provided bulk solidifying amorphous alloy is such that, it has a critical cooling rate of less than 1,000° C./sec, so that a section having a thickness greater than 0.5 mm can be readily cast into an amorphous structure during the fabrication of dental prosthesis. However, more preferably, the critical cooling rate is less than 100° C./sec and most preferably less than 10° C./sec. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the dental prosthesis is cast by providing a bulk-solidifying amorphous alloy having a coefficient of thermal expansion of less than about 10−5 (m/m ° C.), and a glass transition temperature of less than 400° C., and preferably less than 300° C., in order to achieve a high level of replication of the prosthesis mold features after casting.
In a preferred embodiment, the molten amorphous alloy is superheated well above the melting temperature by 100° C. or more. This will provide higher fluidity and will allow the molten alloy to flow a much longer time before solidification. This is especially preferred in cases where the dental prosthesis has a very high aspect ratio (i.e. long and skinny shapes), and/or highly intricate shapes are to be duplicated.
In another preferred embodiment, the feedstock alloy is heated to the molten state under an inert atmosphere and preferably under vacuum.
Regardless of the actual casting method used, the mold itself can be prepared by various methods and preferably by an investment-cast method. In addition, various mechanisms can be utilized to feed the molten alloy into the mold. For example, gravity-feeding methods can be readily utilized, though other mechanisms providing external pressure are preferred. Such mechanisms can use centrifugal forces and/or inert gas pressure. Finally, various configurations of alloy feeding can be utilized, such as bottom-feeding. Another feeding method comprises counter-gravity feeding and casting, in such a method the feeding method is preferably carried out with vacuum suction assistance.
Although specific embodiments are disclosed herein, it is expected that persons skilled in the art can and will design metallic dental prostheses and methods of making such devices that are within the scope of the following description either literally or under the Doctrine of Equivalents.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/185,080, filed Jul. 18, 2011 (now allowed), which is a divisional to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/523,465, filed Nov. 15, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,002,911, issued Aug. 23, 2011) entitled “Metallic Dental Prostheses and Objects Made of Bulk-Solidifying Amorphous Alloys and Method of Making Such Articles”, which is the national stage of International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2003/024461, filed Aug. 5, 2003, and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/401,303, filed Aug. 5, 2002, which are hereby incorporated by referenced in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2106145 | Floraday | Jan 1938 | A |
| 2124538 | Boyer | Jul 1938 | A |
| 3322546 | Tanzman et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 3539192 | Prasse | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3776297 | Williford et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3948613 | Weill | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3970445 | Gale et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3986867 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3989517 | Tanner et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4024902 | Baum | May 1977 | A |
| 4050931 | Tanner et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4064757 | Hasegawa | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4067732 | Ray | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4113478 | Tanner et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4116682 | Polk et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4116687 | Hasegawa | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4124472 | Riegert | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4125737 | Andersson | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4126449 | Tanner et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4135924 | Tanner et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4148669 | Tanner et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4157327 | Martin et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4163071 | Weatherly et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4260416 | Kavesh et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4268564 | Narasimhan | May 1981 | A |
| 4330027 | Narasimhan | May 1982 | A |
| 4374900 | Hara et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4381943 | Dickson et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4396820 | Puschner | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4409296 | Ward | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4478918 | Ueno et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4482612 | Kuroki et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4487630 | Crook et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4488882 | Dausinger et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4499158 | Onuma et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4515870 | Bose et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4523625 | Ast | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4526618 | Keshavan et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4557981 | Bergmann | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4564396 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4585617 | Tenhover et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4612059 | Mori et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4623387 | Masumoto et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4648609 | Deike | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4656099 | Sievers | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4668310 | Kudo et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4721154 | Christ et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4725512 | Scruggs | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4731253 | DuBois | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4741974 | Longo et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4743513 | Scruggs | May 1988 | A |
| 4770701 | Henderson et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4810850 | Tenkula et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4960643 | Lemelson | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4976417 | Smith | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4978590 | Granata, Jr. et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4987033 | Abkowitz et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4990198 | Masumoto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5032196 | Masumoto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5053084 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5053085 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5127969 | Sekhar | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5189252 | Huffman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5213148 | Masumoto et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5250124 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5279349 | Horimura | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5288344 | Peker et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5294462 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5302471 | Ito et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5324368 | Masumoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5368659 | Peker et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380349 | Taniguchi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380375 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5384203 | Apfel | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5440995 | Levitt | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5449425 | Renard et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5482577 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5482580 | Scruggs et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5567251 | Peker et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567532 | Peker et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5618359 | Lin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634989 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5711363 | Scruggs et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5735975 | Lin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5797443 | Lin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5876519 | Inoue | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886254 | Chi | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896642 | Peker | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5950704 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954501 | Masumoto | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6010580 | Dandliker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021840 | Colvin | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027586 | Masumoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044893 | Taniguchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066176 | Oshida | May 2000 | A |
| 6183889 | Koshiba et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200685 | Davidson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203936 | Cisar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6218029 | Rickerby | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231697 | Inoue | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6258183 | Onuki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6306206 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306228 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6325868 | Kim et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6326295 | Figura | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6371195 | Onuki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6376091 | Croopnick | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6408734 | Cohen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6427753 | Inoue et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446558 | Peker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6552639 | Decristofaro et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6620264 | Kundig | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6652673 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6749698 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 20010052406 | Kubota et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020036034 | Xing et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020050310 | Kundig et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162605 | Horton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020175430 | Glidewell | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187379 | Yasuo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20100084052 | Farmer | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20120158151 | Opie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 010237992 | Mar 2003 | DE |
| 2005302 | Apr 1979 | GB |
| 5514090 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 359013056 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| 0551965 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 11066094 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 02000277127 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 02001303218 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| WO 0068469 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 03040422 | May 2003 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Author unknown, “Standard Practice for Conducting Dry Sand/Rubber Wheel Abrasion Tests”, Designation G 61-81, source unknown, pp. 351-368, Dec. 1981. |
| Koch et al., “Preparation of ”Amorphous“ Ni60Nb40 by Mechanical Alloying”, Appl. Phys. Lett., Dec. 1983, vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 1017-1019. |
| Author unknown, “A World of Superabrasives Experience at Your Service”, source unknown, 4 pages, date unknown. |
| Author unknown, Ge Superabrasives—The Metal Bond System, source unknown, 1 page, date unknown. |
| Author unknown, “Ge Superabrasives—The Resin Bond System”, source unknown, 1 page, date unknown. |
| Author unknown, “Ge Superabrasives —The Micron Powders”, source unknown, 1 page, date unknown. |
| Author unknown, “Ge Superabrasives—The MBS-700 Series Product Line”, source unknown, 2 pages, 1991. |
| Author unknown, “Ge Superabrasives—The MBS-900 Series Product Line”, source unknown, 2 pages, 1992. |
| ASM Committee on Tooling Materials, “Superhard Tool Materials”, Metals Handbook, Ninth Edition, vol. 3, Properties and Selection: Stainless Steels, Tool Materials and Special Purpose Metals, American Society for Metals, 1980, pp. 448-465, title page and copyright page. |
| Zhang et al., “Amerphous Zr-A1-Tm (Tm=Co, Ni, Cu) Alloys with Significant Supercooled Liquid Region of Over 100K”, Materials Transactions, JIM, 1991, vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1005-1010. |
| Masumoto, “Recent Progress in Amorphous Metallic Materials in Japan”, Materials Science and Engineering, 1994, vol. A179/A180, pp. 8-16. |
| Inoue et al., “Zr-A1-Ni Amorphous Alloys with High Glass Transition Temperature and Significant Supercooled Liquid Region”, Materials Transactions, JIM, 1990, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 177-183. |
| Tanner et al.,“Physical Properties of Ti50Be40Zr10 Glass”, Scripta Metallurgica, 1977, vol. 11, pp. 783-789. |
| Hasegawa et al., “Superconducting Properties of Be—Zr Glassy Alloys Obtained by Liquid quenching”, May 9, 1977, pp. 3925-3928. |
| Tanner, L. E., “The Stable and Metastable Phase Relations in the Hf—Be Alloy System”, Metallurgica, vol. 28, 1980, pp. 1805-1815. |
| Maret et al., “Structural Study of Be43Hfx|Zr57-x Metallic Glasses by X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction”, J. Physique, 1986, vol. 47, pp. 863-871. |
| Jost et al., “The Structure of Amorphous Be—Ti—Zr Alloys”, Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie Neue Folge, Bd. 157, 1988, pp. 11-15. |
| Tanner et al., “Metallic Glass Formation and Properties in Zr and Ti Alloyed with Be—I the Binary Zr—Be and Ti—Be Systems”, Acta Metallurgica, 1979, vol. 27, pp. 1727-1747. |
| Inoue et al., Bulk Amorphous Alloys with High Mechanical Strength and Good Soft Magnetic Properties in Fe—Tm—B (Tm=IV-VIII Group transition Metal) System, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, No. 4, Jul. 28, 1997, pp. 464-466. |
| Shen et al., Bulk Glassy CO43Fe20Ta5.5B31.5 Alloy with High Glass-Forming Ability ad Good Soft Magnetic Properties, Materials Transactions, vol. 42, No. 10 (2001) pp. 2136-2139. |
| International Search Report mailed Apr. 21, 2004, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2003/24461. |
| Hays et al., “Microstructure Controlled Shear Band Pattern Formation and Enhanced Plasticity of Bulk Metallic Glasses Containing in situ Formed Ductile Phase Dendrite Dispersions”, Physical Review Letters vol. 84, p. 2901, 2000. |
| Tien H.Y. et al., “New Ternary Ni—Ta—Sn bulk metallic glasses”, Intermetallics, vol. 14, Issue 8-9, Aug.-Sep. 2006, pp. 1075-1079. |
| Pang S. et al., “Bulk glassy Ni(CO-)Nb—Ti—Zr alloys with high corrosion resistance and high strength”, Materials Sci and Engineering A, vol. 375, special issue, Jul. 15, 2004, pp. 368-371. |
| Xu, D. et al., “Formation and properties of new Ni-based amorphous alloys with critical casting thickness up to 5 mm”, Acta Materialla, vol. 52, issue 12, Jul. 12, 2004, pp. 3493-3497. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140150933 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60401303 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13185080 | Jul 2011 | US |
| Child | 14174206 | US | |
| Parent | 10523465 | US | |
| Child | 13185080 | US |
