The invention is a method and system for processing colonography image data and displaying colonography images.
Colonography, the use of electronic imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) to generate images of a patient's colon for purposes of colorectal cancer screening, is generally known. By way of example, these technologies are disclosed in the Johnson et al. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,928,314 and 7,035,681, the Zalis U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,784, the Vining U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,909,913 and 7,149,564, and PCT publication no. WO 2007/030132, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, this methodology involves obtaining a series of CT images of adjacent portions or slices of the colon. A radiologist then studies each of the images to identify any pre-cancerous polyps. Alternatively, a computer can effectively create a simulated intraluminal flight through the colon (this is also known as virtual colonoscopy). Colonography has been demonstrated to be a highly efficacious approach for detecting colorectal polyps.
Readers of CT colonography data sometimes prefer to maintain a small field of view, to maximize conspicuity of small polyps. However, this requires them to manually follow the colon throughout the abdomen and pelvis. Manually following the colon as it curves through the body can at times be difficult and may distract the reader from his or her primary task, which is to locate polyps and lesions within the colon. The reader may also sometimes recenter the segment of interest in the workstation display, further complicating the primary task. Conversely, the need for such recentering may be reduced if the image is viewed at a large field of view, but then any polyps may be more difficult to identify.
The invention is an improved method and system for processing and displaying colonography image data. In one embodiment of the invention the image data is processed to identify a centerline of the colon. A series of oblique image data sets representative of images of the colon at sequential locations along the centerline is generated. Each image is generally centered on the centerline, presents a field of view generally perpendicular to the centerline and is oriented with the bottom of the colon down.
This invention is a display technique based on the automatic generation of a midline trace or centerline of the colon and then the display of a sequence of images that are centered on this trace, are perpendicular to it, and follow along it. This displays the colon in true cross section along its entire length, as if it had been straightened and sliced perpendicular to its long axis. Such a viewing technique can enhance the prominence of polyps sticking out into the lumen of the colon. The technique can help keep the observer's attention focused on the colon, and display the colon at an optimal size and in an optimal plane for lesion detection. This can result in faster reading times with less disruption of concentration, and may yield both time savings and improvements in accuracy.
A centerline trace is shown in
The radiologist controls the centerline position currently observed and field of view (e.g., the size of the field of view) with a mouse, slider bar or other keyboard or GUI control. As the radiologist advances through the centerline, the image shown is constantly updated to be from the slice corresponding to the current centerline position and centered on its location.
The field of view (FOV) is preferably large enough to show sufficient detail in the image, yet small enough so that the reader can view the image relatively quickly. The appropriate size FOV can be determined. Alternatively, GUI or other controls can be installed to make this adjustable by the user. Navigational aids to orient the user as to the current location, such as a full rendering of the colon (
Although the invention is described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/881,294, filed Jan. 19, 2007 and entitled Oblique Centerline Following Display Of CT Colonography Images, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference
This invention was made with government support under Government Contract No. CA075333 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/051676 | 1/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 1/27/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/089483 | 7/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5891030 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913820 | Bladen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6374134 | Bladen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516212 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522907 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6757557 | Bladen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785410 | Vining et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6909913 | Vining | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6928314 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947784 | Zalis | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7035681 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7149564 | Vining et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174202 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20060018549 | Liang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023966 | Vining | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047227 | Jerebko | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060270928 | Geiger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280351 | Luping et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003131 | Kaufman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070071297 | Geiger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070167722 | Bladen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080117210 | Razeto et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118117 | Gauldie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007030132 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2008089483 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089489 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089490 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089492 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Carston, Michael J. et al., “CT Colonography of the Unprepared Colon: An Evaluation of Electronic Stool Subtraction”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5746, pp. 424-431, 2005. |
Cotton, Peter B. et al., “Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A Multicenter Comparison With Standard Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia”, JAMA, Apr. 14, 2004, vol. 291, No. 14, pp. 1713-1719. |
Gatto, Nicolle M. et al., “Risk of Perforation After Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy: A Population-Based Study”, Journal of the national Cancer institute, vol. 95, No. 3, Feb. 5, 2003, pp. 230-236. |
Iannaccone, Riccardo et al., “Computed Tomographic Colonography Without Cathartic Preparation for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps”, Gastroenterology, vol. 127, pp. 1300-1311, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051676, mailed Aug. 1, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051699, mailed Jul. 11, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051703, mailed Jul. 14, 2008, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051710, mailed Jul. 30, 2008, 12 pages. |
Jemal, Ahmedin et al., “Cancer Statistics 2003”, CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53:5-26. |
Johnson, C. Daniel et al., “Prospective Blinded Evaluation of Computed Tomographic Colonography for Screen Detection of Colorectal Polyps”, Gastroenterology 2003; 125:311-319. |
Lakare, Sarang et al., “Electronic Colon Cleansing Using Segmentation Rays for Virtual Colonoscopy”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 4683 pp. 412-418, 2002. |
Lakare, Sarang et al., “Robust Colon Residue Detection Using Vector Quantization Based Classification for Virtual Colonoscopy”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5031, pp. 515-520, 2003. |
Lieberman, David A. et al., “Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, Jul. 20, 2000, No. 3, pp. 162-169. |
Pickhardt, Perry J. et al., “Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults”, The New England Journal of medicine, Dec. 4, 2003, vol. 349, No. 23, pp. 2191-2200. |
Ristvedt, Stephen L. et al., “Patient Preferences for CT Colonography, Conventional Colonoscopy, and Bowel Preparation”, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 98, No. 3, 2003, pp. 579-585. |
Seeff, Laura C. et al., “Are We Doing Enough to Screen for Colorectal Cancer? Findings From the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System”, The Journal of Family Practice, vol. 51, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 761-766. |
Serlie, Iwo et al., “A Probabilistic Method for Virtual Colonoscopy Cleansing”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5031, pp. 405-412, 2003. |
Serlie, Iwo et al., “Computed Cleansing for Virtual Colonoscopy Using a Three-Material Transition Model”, R.E. Ellis and T.M. Peters (Eds.): MICCAI 2003, LNCS 8979, pp. 175-183, 2003, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003. |
Weitzman, Elissa R. et al., “Risk and Reluctance: Understanding Impediments to Colorectal Cancer Screening”, Preventive Medicine 32, 502-513 (2001. |
Winawer, Sidney J. et al., “Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, No. 27, Dec. 30, 1993, pp. 1978-1981. |
Zalis, Michael E. et al., “Digital Subtraction Bowel Cleansing for CT Colonography using Morphological and Linear Filtration Methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. vol. 23, pp. 1335-1343, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100142776 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60881294 | Jan 2007 | US |