Obstacle detection for a mobile automation apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11449059
  • Patent Number
    11,449,059
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 27, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 20, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Obstacle detection for a mobile automation apparatus is provided. The mobile automation apparatus includes a structured light camera positioned on a support structure to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus. The mobile automation apparatus can include other structured light cameras. Furthermore, one or more ultrasound arrays are used as secondary obstacle detector such that when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect an object, and at least one structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, an obstacle avoidance protocol is implemented.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Mobile automation apparatuses are increasingly being used in retail environments to perform inventory tracking. Such mobile automation apparatuses may be equipped with various sensors to autonomously navigate paths within the retail environment and perform such tasks. During such autonomous navigation, the mobile automation apparatuses may perform ancillary tasks that include data capture, avoiding obstacles, stopping, docking, and the like. Hence, a key issue during such autonomous navigation in a retail environment is to be able to detect static obstacles and/or moving obstacles. Static obstacles include boxes, pillars, reflective stanchions, baskets, and other items found in retail environments. Moving obstacles include shopping carts, retail associates, cleaning equipment, and shoppers. Especially with obstacles such as humans and/or obstacles associated with humans, such as shopping carts, the mobile automation apparatuses must be able to detect these obstacles from a safe distance in order to stop or avoid the obstacles. These challenges are compounded in retail environments where lighting varies in different areas. Furthermore, highly reflective and/or shiny obstacle objects found in the retail environment, such as mirrors, stanchions, see-through glass doors, aisle siding, and other reflective materials, may also cause variable lighting that compounds the challenges associated with obstacle avoidance. In particular, the reflective metal lattice on shopping carts, for example, can be difficult to detect. Indeed, a single sensor by itself does not exist, at low cost, that can detect all of the complex obstacles listed above.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a mobile automation system in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a side view of a mobile automation apparatus in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the mobile automation apparatus of FIG. 2 in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a control application in accordance with some embodiments



FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method of shopping cart detection for a mobile automation apparatus in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 6 is a side view of the mobile automation apparatus of FIG. 2 detecting a shopping cart in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method of obstacle detection for a mobile automation apparatus in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 8 is a side view of the mobile automation apparatus of FIG. 2 detecting an object in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 9 depicts the mobile automation apparatus of FIG. 2 implementing an obstacle avoidance protocol in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 10 depicts an arrangement of fields of view of structured light cameras at the mobile automation apparatus of FIG. 2 in accordance with some embodiments





Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.


The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the specification provides a mobile automation apparatus comprising: a support structure extending in an upward direction; a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment; a structured light camera positioned on the mast, the structured light camera configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus; and, a controller configured to: when the structured light camera detects the top of the shopping cart, control the navigation module to implement an obstacle avoidance protocol.


In some embodiments, the structured light camera is located at a height on the mast where the structured light camera acquires images of the top of a shopping cart in the region.


In some embodiments, the structured light camera is at an angle of 45°±5° to the mast, and at a height of between 1.3 meters to 1.8 meters up the mast.


In some embodiments, the mobile automation apparatus further comprises a base, the support structure extending in the upward direction from the base; and one or more of a depth sensing device and a LIDAR device located at the base, and configured to sense depth at an ankle height.


In some embodiments, the mobile automation apparatus further comprises one or more second structured light cameras between a base of the mast and the structured light camera, the one or more second structured light cameras configured to detect objects over respective angles on either side of the region.


In some embodiments, the mobile automation apparatus further comprises one or more ultrasound arrays on the mast, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays configured to detect objects at least in the region. In some embodiments, the controller is further configured to: when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect an object, and the structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, control the navigation module to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol. In some embodiments, the controller is further configured to: when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect the object, and the structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, control the navigation module to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol only when the object is within a threshold distance.


In some embodiments, the navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in the environment in a forward direction, and the structured light camera is further configured to detect at least the top of the shopping cart in the region in the forward direction.


In some embodiments, the obstacle avoidance protocol comprises one or more of: stopping the navigation module, slowing the navigation module and controlling the navigation module to avoid the shopping cart.


A further aspect of the specification provides a method comprising: at a mobile automation apparatus comprising: a support structure extending in an upward direction; a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment; a structured light camera positioned on the mast, the structured light camera configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus; and, a controller, when the structured light camera detects the top of the shopping cart, controlling, using the controller, the navigation module to implement an obstacle avoidance protocol.


A further aspect of the specification provides a mobile automation apparatus comprising: a support structure extending in an upward direction; a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment; at least one structured light camera located on the mast, the at least one structured light camera configured to detect objects over a region; one or more ultrasound arrays on the mast, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays configured to detect the objects over the region; and, a controller configured to: when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect an object, and the at least one structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, control the navigation module to implement an obstacle avoidance protocol.


In some embodiments, the controller is further configured to: when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect the object, and at least one structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, control the navigation module to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol only when the object is within a threshold distance.


In some embodiments, the navigation module is configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in the environment in a forward direction, and at least one structured light camera and the one or more ultrasound arrays are further configured to detect the objects in the forward direction.


In some embodiments, the obstacle avoidance protocol comprises one or more of: stopping the navigation module, slowing the navigation module and controlling the navigation module to avoid the object.


In some embodiments, the structured light camera is mounted at an angle of 45°±5° to the mast, and at a height of between 1.3 meters to 1.8 meters up the mast.


In some embodiments, the one or more ultrasound arrays are further configured to detect the objects over a 360° field of view.


A further aspect of the specification provides a method comprising: at a mobile automation apparatus comprising: a support structure extending in an upward direction; a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment; at least one structured light camera located on the mast, the at least one structured light camera configured to detect objects over a region; one or more ultrasound arrays on the mast, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays configured to detect the objects over the region; and, a controller, when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect an object, and the at least one structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, controlling, using the controller, the navigation module to implement an obstacle avoidance protocol.


A further aspect of the specification provides a mobile automation apparatus comprising: a support structure extending in an upward direction; a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment; at least one structured light camera located on the mast, the at least one structured light camera configured to detect objects over a region; one or more ultrasound arrays on the mast, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays configured to detect the objects over the region; and, a controller, wherein when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect an object and the at least one structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object, the controller controls the navigation module to implement an obstacle avoidance protocol.


A further aspect of the specification provides a mobile automation apparatus comprising an ultrasound sensor; a structured light camera positioned higher than the ultrasound sensor; a controller configured to compare ultrasound sensor data to structured light data; and a navigation module configured to alter the navigation of the mobile automation apparatus based on the comparison. In some embodiments, the mobile automation apparatus further comprises a communication interface configured to transmit a notification of the alteration to a mobile device. In some embodiments, the notification includes a location of the mobile automation apparatus.



FIG. 1 depicts a mobile automation system 100 in accordance with the teachings of this disclosure. Such a mobile automation system 100 may be operated in a retail facility, such as a store, supermarket, shopping mall, showroom, warehouse club, convenience store, or within a service facility such as a restaurant or pharmacy, or within a warehouse, factory, or industrial facility. The facility may include multiple shelf modules 110 positioned within the facility. The shelf modules 110 may be arranged to define a plurality of aisles. At least one zone of the facility may include shelf modules 110, aisles, walls, posts, pillars, bins, conveyors or equipment. The system 100 includes a server 101 in communication with at least one mobile automation apparatus 103 (also referred to herein simply as the apparatus 103) and at least one mobile device 105 via communication links 107, illustrated in the present example as including wireless links. The system 100 is deployed, in the illustrated example, in a retail environment including a plurality of shelf modules 110 each supporting a plurality of products 112. Each shelf module has one or more generally planar shelves, generally extending along a length of the shelf module and oriented at various vertical heights for supporting a plurality of products 112 in positions conducive to retail merchandising. Each shelf also has a front edge that may be used to position shelf merchandising materials 114 such as a price label, an electronic shelf label, shelf talker, advertising signage, or a coupon dispensing apparatus. The apparatus 103 may be deployed within the facility where it may move between one or more zones of the facility, monitoring a region in proximity to the apparatus 103. More specifically, the apparatus 103 is deployed within the retail environment, and controlled by the server 101 (via the link 107) to travel the length of at least a portion of the shelf module 110. The apparatus 103 is equipped with a plurality of data capture sensors, such as image sensors (e.g. one or more digital cameras) and depth sensors (e.g. one or more Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors), and is further configured to employ the sensors to capture sensor data, that may be associated with a shelf module, products positioned on the shelf module, or shelf merchandising materials. In the present example, the apparatus 103 is configured to capture a series of digital images of the modules 110, as well as a series of depth measurements, each describing the distance and direction between the apparatus 103 and a point on or enclosed by a module 110.


The server 101 includes a controller 120, interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a memory 122. The memory 122 includes any suitable combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory, hard drive). In general, the controller 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. The controller 120, for example, includes any suitable combination of central processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs) and/or any suitable combination of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and/or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) configured to implement the specific functionality of the server 101. In an embodiment, the controller 120, further includes one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs). In an embodiment, a specially designed integrated circuit, such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is designed to perform specific functionality of the server 101, either alternatively or in addition to the controller 120 and the memory 122. As those of skill in the art will realize, the mobile automation apparatus 103 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to control navigational and/or data capture aspects of the mobile automation apparatus 103.


The server 101 also includes a communications interface 124 interconnected with the controller 120. The communications interface 124 includes any suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105—via the links 107. In some embodiments, a link 107 may be a direct wired link, such as a cable or data bus. It some embodiments a link 107 may be a direct wireless link, such as a radio signal, infrared communication, or sound communication. In some embodiments, a link 107 may be a networked communication that traverses one or more networks, such as a local area network or wide-area network. The specific components of the communications interface 124 are selected based on the type of communication links (e.g. networks) enabled by the server 101. In the present example, a wireless local-area network is implemented within the retail environment via the deployment of one or more wireless access points. The links 107 therefore include both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.


The memory 122 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the controller 120. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the controller 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include a control application 128, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the control application 128 or subcomponents thereof, the controller 120 is configured to implement various functionality. The controller 120, as configured via the execution of the control application 128, is also referred to herein as the controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured hardware elements (e.g. one or more ASICs) rather than by execution of the control application 128 by the controller 120.


In general, the controller 120 is configured to control the apparatus 103 to capture data, and to obtain the captured data via the communications interface 124 and store the captured data in a repository 132 in the memory 122. The server 101 is further configured to perform various post-processing operations on the captured data, and to detect the status of the products 112 on the modules 110. When certain status indicators are detected, the server 101 is also configured to transmit status notifications to the mobile device 105.


For example, in some embodiments, the server 101 is configured via the execution of the control application 128 by the controller 120, to process image and depth data captured by the apparatus 103 to identify portions of the captured data depicting a back of a module 110, and to detect gaps between the products 112 based on those identified portions. Furthermore, the server 101 is configured to provide a map and/or paths and/or path segments and/or navigation data and/or navigation instructions to the apparatus 103 to enable the apparatus 103 to navigate the modules 110.


Attention is next directed to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 which respectively depict: a schematic side perspective view of the apparatus 103, showing particular sensors of the apparatus 103; and a schematic block diagram of the apparatus 103.


With reference to FIG. 2, the apparatus 103 generally comprises: a base 210 configured to move on wheels 212 (e.g. on a floor 213 of the environment), and the like; and a mast 214 and/or a support structure extending in an upward direction (e.g. vertically) from the base 210. However, in other embodiments, the base 210 moves on devices other than wheels, for example casters, tracks and the like.


The apparatus 103 is further provisioned with various sensors for obstacle avoidance which include, but are not limited to: a structured light camera 218 located on the mast 214, the structured light camera 218 configured to detect objects over a region, for example in a field of view of the structured light camera 218; one or more ultrasound arrays 220-1, 220-2 on the mast 214, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays 220-1, 220-2 configured to detect objects over the region in which the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect objects; one or more of a depth sensing device and a LIDAR device 221 located at the base 210, and configured to sense depth at an ankle height (e.g. over the region in which the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect objects); and one or more second structured light cameras 228 between a bottom end of the mast 214 and the structured light camera 218, the one or more second structured light cameras 218 configured to detect objects over respective angles on either side of the region (e.g. the region in which the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect objects).


It is further understood that detection of an object as described herein includes, but is not limited to, detection of a portion of an object and further understood that different sensors may detect different portions of the same object.


While not depicted, the base 210 and the mast 214 may be provisioned with other various navigation sensors for navigating in the environment in which the modules 110 are located and various further data acquisition sensors for acquiring electronic data and/or digital data associated with the modules 110, products 112, or shelf merchandising materials 114. Such data may be used for one or more of stock detection, low stock detection, price label verification, plug detection, planogram compliance and the like.


As depicted, the location and geometry of the structured light camera 218 on the mast 214 is selected such that the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus 103. For example, the structured light camera 218 is located at a height on the mast 214 where the structured light camera 218 acquires images of a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent the mobile automation apparatus 103. Indeed, the structured light camera 218 is generally configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus 103. For example, shopping carts are generally about 0.8 m high. Hence, the structured light camera 218 may be mounted as depicted at an angle of 45°±5° to the mast 214, and at a height of between 1.3 meters to 1.8 meters up the mast 214, for example, as depicted, at about 1.5 m from a bottom of the wheels 212 or above the floor 213.


Other geometries of the structured light camera 218 are within the scope of present embodiments. However, as the structured light camera 218 is generally pointing towards the floor 213, the structured light camera 218 is generally configured to detect objects in the field of view of structured light camera 218 including objects on the floor 213 that may not be detectable by the other sensors.


The structured light camera 218 is generally configured to detect objects by projecting structured light (including, but not limited to, infrared light) onto a region, including, but not limited to one or more of vertical stripes, horizontal stripes, dots, and the like, and acquiring images of the structure light projected onto the region (including, but not limited to, infrared images). Discontinuities in the structured light detected in the acquired images indicate objects in the field of view of the structured light camera 218. In other words, the region in which objects are detected is the field of view of the structured light camera 218 that is illuminated by the projected images. Hence, the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a field of view of the structured light camera 218, which depends on the angle and height of the structured light camera 218.


The two or more structured light cameras 228 operate in a similar fashion, but are aimed about perpendicularly away from the mast 214, however at different angles. In a particular embodiment, the two or more structured light cameras 218 are aimed without an overlap in their fields of view, with a gap therebetween being filled in by the field of view of the structured light camera 218. An example geometry of the two or more structured light cameras 228 is described below with respect to FIG. 10.


Furthermore, while the one or more ultrasound arrays 220-1, 220-2 are at least configured to detect objects over the region in which objects are detected by the structured light camera 218, in some embodiments, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220-1, 220-2 are further configured to detect the objects circumferentially around the mast 214 and/or the apparatus 103. An ultrasound array 220 may be configured to detect objects in any direction from the mast (360° detection) or only in certain angular regions around the mast 214 and/or the apparatus 103. The one or more ultrasound arrays 220-1, 220-2 are interchangeably referred to hereafter, collectively, as ultrasound arrays 220 and, generically, as an ultrasound array 220. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the ultrasound arrays 220 comprise phased ultrasound arrays.


The ultrasound arrays 220 generally operate by transmitting an ultrasound pulse and receiving reflections of the ultrasound pulse from objects in a range of the transmitted ultrasound pulse, for example in a phased manner. Indeed, each of the ultrasound arrays 220 generally comprises a plurality of ultrasound transducers arranged circumferentially around the mast 214 which transmit respective ultrasound pulses in a phased manner. Overlaps in the fields of view of adjacent ultrasound transducers can assist with pinpointing a general location of an object reflecting a respective ultrasound pulse. For example, if an object is detected by a first ultrasound transducer, but not detected by a second adjacent ultrasound transducer, the object is located in an angular region associated with only the first ultrasound transducer; however, an object detected by both the first and the second ultrasound transducers is located in an angular region within the overlapping fields of view of the two adjacent ultrasound transducers.


The LIDAR device 221 generally operates by transmitting laser pulses (e.g. an infrared laser pulse) at a plurality of known angles, and a sensor (e.g. a light sensor and/or an infrared sensor) at the LIDAR device 221 measures a distance to a point of interaction with a surface using a time-of-flight measurement. The LIDAR device 221 is generally at an ankle height, for example between about 5 cm to about 10 cm from the floor 213 and is generally configured to scan over a plane horizontal to the floor 213. Hence, the LIDAR device 221 is configured to detect wheels of shopping carts, legs of modules 110, and the like. However, other depth detecting devices may be used in place of the LIDAR device 221 in other embodiments.


Furthermore, one or more combinations of sensor data from the sensors (e.g. the structured light cameras 218, 228, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220, and the LIDAR device 221) are useable by the apparatus 103 to determine a distance of an object from each respective sensor. For example, structured light images can indicate distance of objects, as can data from LIDAR devices and ultrasound arrays.


In addition, in some embodiments, the apparatus 103 is generally configured to move in a forward direction, for example, in a direction being imaged by the LIDAR device 221. In some of these embodiments, the structured light camera 218 is further configured to detect at least a top of a shopping cart in a region in the forward direction and/or a movement direction.


Data from the various obstacle sensors at the apparatus 103 may be processed at the apparatus 103 and used to avoid obstacles including, but not limited to shopping carts.


For example, attention is next directed to FIG. 3 which depicts a schematic block diagram of further components of the apparatus 103. In particular, the apparatus 103 includes a special purpose controller 320 specifically designed to implement obstacle detection as described herein. The controller 320 is connected to a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a memory 322. The memory 322 includes any suitable combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory, hard drive). In general, the controller 320 and the memory 322 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. The controller 320, for example, includes any suitable combination of central processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs) and/or any suitable combination of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and/or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) configured to implement the specific functionality of the apparatus 103. Further, as depicted, the memory 322 includes a repository 332 for storing data, for example data collected by sensors 330. In an embodiment, the controller 320, further includes one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs). In an embodiment, a specially designed integrated circuit, such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is designed to implement obstacle detection as discussed herein, either alternatively or in addition to the controller 320 and memory 322. As those of skill in the art will realize, the mobile automation apparatus 103 can also include one or more special purpose controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 320, specifically configured to control navigational and/or data capture aspects of the mobile automation apparatus 103.


The apparatus 103 also includes a communications interface 324 interconnected with the controller 320. The communications interface 324 includes any suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the apparatus 103 to communicate with other devices—particularly the server 101 and, optionally, the mobile device 105—for example via the links 107, and the like. The specific components of the communications interface 324 are selected based on the type of network or other links over which the apparatus 103 is required to communicate, including, but not limited to, the wireless local-area network of the retail environment of the system 100.


The memory 322 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the controller 320. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the controller 320 configures the apparatus 103 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 322 include a control application 328, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the control application 328 or subcomponents thereof, the controller 320 is configured to implement various functionality. The controller 320, as configured via the execution of the control application 328, is also referred to herein as the controller 320. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 320 described below may also be performed by preconfigured hardware elements (e.g. one or more ASICs) rather than by execution of the control application 328 by the controller 320.


The apparatus 103 further includes sensors 330, including, but not limited to, the structured light camera 218, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220, the LIDAR device 221 (and/or any other depth sensing device at the same location), the one or more second structured light cameras 228, and other navigation and/or data acquisition sensors.


The apparatus 103 further includes a navigation module 340 configured to move the apparatus 103 in an environment, for example the environment of the modules 110. The navigation module 340 comprises any suitable combination of motors, electric motors, stepper motors, and the like configured to drive and/or steer the wheels 212, and the like, of the apparatus 103. The apparatus 103 generally includes sensors (e.g. a wheel odometer, an IMU (inertial measurement unit), and the like for measuring distances travelled by the apparatus 103.


Hence, in general, the controller 320 is configured to control the apparatus 103 to: navigate the environment of the module 110 using data from the navigation sensors (which can include, but is not limited to, the structured light cameras 218, 228, the LIDAR device 221 and the one or more ultrasound arrays 220) to control the navigation module 340; and control the data acquisition sensors to acquire sensor data, such as electronic data and/or digital data used for one or more of stock detection, low stock detection, price label verification, plug detection, planogram compliance and the like. For example, while not depicted, the memory 322 further stores a map, and the like, of the environment, which may be used for navigation in conjunction with the navigation sensors. The memory may also store sensor data from the data acquisition sensors that may be transmitted to the server 101 for processing.


In the present example, in particular, the apparatus 103 is configured via the execution of the control application 328 by the controller 320, to avoid obstacles using at least camera data from the structured light camera 218.


Turning now to FIG. 4, before describing the operation of the application 328 to avoid obstacles, certain components of the application 328 will be described in greater detail. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in 15 examples the components of the application 328 may be separated into distinct applications, or combined into other sets of components. Some or all of the components illustrated in FIG. 4 may also be implemented as dedicated hardware components (e.g. one or more FPGAs and/or one or more ASICs).


As depicted the application 328 is depicted as receiving camera data 428 (e.g. images) from the structured light camera 218, as well as ultrasound data 420 from the one or more ultrasound arrays 220, LIDAR data 421 from the LIDAR device 221 and further camera data 428 (e.g. images) from the one or more second structured light cameras 228.


The control application 328 includes an obstacle avoider 401. In brief, the obstacle avoider 401 is configured to process one or more of the camera data 418, the ultrasound data 420, the LIDAR data 421 and the further camera data 428 to avoid obstacles.


The obstacle avoider 401 includes: an obstacle detector 410 (also referred to herein simply as a detector 410), a distance determiner 411, and an obstacle avoidance protocol 412. In brief, the detector 410 is configured to process camera data 418 captured by the structured light camera 218 to determine whether an object has been detected or not and, depending on a distance to the object, as determined by the distance determiner 411, the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 is used to control the navigation module 340 to avoid the object. As depicted, the obstacle detector 410 includes a shopping cart detector 410a configured to process the camera data 418 captured by the structured light camera 218 to determine whether the object includes a shopping cart and, in particular, a top of a shopping cart.


In some embodiments, each of the detector 410 and shopping cart detector 410a comprises signature data (e.g., sensor output signatures indicative of detecting a shopping cart object) and/or threshold data and/or algorithms respectively associated with detecting objects, including shopping carts, using, for example, each of the camera data 418, the ultrasound data 420, the LIDAR data 421 and the further camera data 428.


One or more of the camera data 418, the ultrasound data 420, the LIDAR data 421 and the further camera data 428 is used by the distance determiner 411 to determine a distance of an object to the apparatus 103 (and/or a respective sensor), which implements any number of distance determining techniques.


Attention is now directed to FIG. 5 which depicts a flowchart representative of an example method 500 for obstacle avoidance and, in particular, shopping cart avoidance. The example operations of the method 500 of FIG. 5 correspond to machine readable instructions that are executed by, for example, the apparatus 103, and specifically by the controller 320 and/or the various components of the control application 328 including, but not limited to, the obstacle avoider 401. Indeed, the example method 500 of FIG. 5 is one way in which the apparatus 103 is configured. However, the following discussion of the example method 500 of FIG. 5 will lead to a further understanding of the apparatus 103, and its various components. However, it is to be understood that in other embodiments, the apparatus 103 and/or the method 500 are varied, and hence need not work exactly as discussed herein in conjunction with each other, and that such variations are within the scope of present embodiments.


Furthermore, the example method 500 of FIG. 5 need not be performed in the exact sequence as shown and likewise, in other embodiments, various blocks may be performed in parallel rather than in sequence. Accordingly, the elements of method 500 are referred to herein as “blocks” rather than “steps.” The example method 500 of FIG. 5 may be implemented on variations of the example apparatus 103, as well.


At block 501, the controller 320 determines whether the structured light camera 218 has detected a top of a shopping cart. For example, the block 501 occurs using the shopping cart detector 410a in conjunction with camera data 418 from the structured light camera 218, such as by comparing the camera data 418 with sensor output signature that is indicative of detecting a top of a shopping cart object.


At the block 503, when the structured light camera 218 detects the top of the shopping cart, the controller 320 controls the navigation module 340 to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol 412. For example, the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 comprises one or more of: stopping the navigation module 340 (e.g. stopping the apparatus 103), slowing the apparatus 103, and controlling the navigation module 340 to avoid the shopping cart (e.g. steer the apparatus 103 around the shopping cart 603).


The method 500 repeats each time the controller 320 determines that the structured light camera 218 has detected a top of a shopping cart at block 501. Hence, the method 500 generally runs in parallel with other methods at the apparatus 103, including, for example other data detection methods (e.g. for detecting prices, barcodes, and the like) and/or navigation methods.


The method 500 is now described with reference to FIG. 6, which is substantially similar to FIG. 2, with like elements having like numbers, but includes a shopping cart 603 comprising an angled reflective metal lattice 605 and/or mesh, on wheels 612, with a bumper 621, and the like, located at a top of the shopping cart 603. The bumper 621 is generally manufactured from one or more of plastic, rubber, resin, and the like. In other embodiments, however, the bumper 621 is part of the lattice 605, where the bumper 621 is one or more of painted, anodized, scratched, so as to be rendered more detectable, by the structured light cameras 218, 228, than the remainder of the lattice 605. Either way, the bumper 621 is generally a part of a bumper and/or a top rim of the shopping cart 603. In the depicted example, the bumper 621 is further located about 0.8 m above the floor 213 and/or the height of the top of the shopping cart 603 is about 0.8 m. The bumper 621 can be a ring around the top of the shopping cart 603 and can be colloquially referred to as a plastic protector ring.


Furthermore, as depicted, the shopping cart 603 is located in a region being imaged by the structured light cameras 218, 228, and the LIDAR device 221. The behavior of the ultrasound arrays 220 is described below.


As depicted, the LIDAR device 221 is attempting to depth scan the wheels 612 (as indicated by the dotted line extending from the LIDAR device 221), and the two or more further structured light cameras 228 are attempting to image the metal lattice 605. However, as the wheels 612 are generally inset from an outside perimeter of the shopping cart 603 (e.g. due to the angle of the lattice 605, which widens from bottom to top) and/or the wheels 612 occupy only a portion of the space under the shopping cart 603, a depth detection of the wheels 612 by the LIDAR device 221 is generally a poor indication of the position of the shopping cart 603; in other words, a front edge of the shopping cart could collide with the apparatus 103 prior to the wheels 612 being detected.


Similarly, the two or more structured light cameras 228 are imaging (as indicated by the dotted lines extending from the two or more structured light cameras 228) the metal lattice 605, which generally is both specularly reflective of light (e.g. the structured light projected by the two are more structured light cameras 228) and includes various air gaps between the metal portions of the lattice which provide no reflections. Hence, the imaging of the metal lattice by the two or more structured light cameras 228 is generally prone to error and/or can be unreliable.


However, due to the location and orientation of the structured light camera 218, the structured light camera 218 is configured to detect at least a top of the shopping cart 603, and in particular the non-reflective bumper 621, in a region adjacent to the mobile automation apparatus 103. As the bumper 621 is not specularly reflective, and is also a solid piece (e.g. lacking air gaps), the camera data 418 from the structured light camera 218 provides a more reliable indication of whether there is a shopping cart adjacent the apparatus 103.


In any event, once the shopping cart 603 is detected by the structured light camera 218, as determined using, for example, the shopping cart detector 410a, the controller 320 controls the navigation module 340 to stop and/or slow down and/or navigate around the shopping cart 603. For example, the navigation module 340 moves the apparatus 103 to a new path that goes around the shopping cart 603 (e.g. as depicted in FIG. 9).


The region where the top of the shopping cart 603 is detectable by the structured light camera 218 is generally controlled by adjusting the height and orientation of the structured light camera 218. For example, by raising the structured light camera 218 on the mast 214, and/or increasing the angle of the structured light camera 218 outwards from the mast 214, the structured light camera 218 detects the shopping cart 603 when it is further from the apparatus 103; similarly, by lowering the structured light camera 218 on the mast 214, and/or decreasing the angle of the structured light camera 218 inwards, the structured light camera 218 detects the shopping cart 603 when it is closer to the apparatus 103. The structured light camera 218 is, however, at a height and orientation where the bumper 621 of the shopping cart 603 is in a field of view of the structured light camera 218. Hence, in general, the height and orientation of the structured light camera 218 is based on a height of a shopping cart and a distance at which the shopping cart is to be detected. In the depicted embodiments, the shopping cart 603 is about 0.8 m high, and the structured light camera 218 is at a height of about 1.5 m, and an angle of about 45°±5°; hence the shopping cart 603 is detectable about 1 m away from the apparatus 103, which is a sufficient distance for the apparatus 103 to navigate around the shopping cart 603 when detected. However other heights and orientations are within the scope of present embodiments.


In some embodiments, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 are used to determine a false negative at the structured light camera 218 and/or the second structured light cameras 228. For example, in some instances, including when a reflective metal lattice 605 is within their fields of view, the structured light cameras 218, 228 may not detect a shopping cart and/or other object and/or obstacle. As such, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 are used at least as a secondary level of obstacle detection.


Hence, attention is now directed to FIG. 7 which depicts a flowchart representative of an example method 700 for avoidance of obstacles having reflective and/or discontinuous (e.g., meshed or lattice-like) surfaces. The example operations of the method 700 of FIG. 7 correspond to machine readable instructions that are executed by, for example, the apparatus 103, and specifically by the controller 320 and/or the various components of the control application 328 including, but not limited to, the obstacle avoider 401. Indeed, the example method 700 of FIG. 7 is one way in which the apparatus 103 is configured. However, the following discussion of the example method 700 of FIG. 7 will lead to a further understanding of the apparatus 103, and its various components. However, it is to be understood that in other embodiments, the apparatus 103 and/or the method 700 are varied, and hence need not work exactly as discussed herein in conjunction with each other, and that such variations are within the scope of present embodiments.


Furthermore, the example method 700 of FIG. 7 need not be performed in the exact sequence as shown and likewise, in other embodiments, various blocks may be performed in parallel rather than in sequence. Accordingly, the elements of method 700 are referred to herein as “blocks” rather than “steps.” The example method 700 of FIG. 7 may be implemented on variations of the example apparatus 103, as well.


At block 701, the controller 320 determines when the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 detect a reflective object and/or an object having discontinuous planar surfaces (e.g., a reflective metal lattice 605 of the cart 603), and the structured light cameras 218, 228 simultaneously do not detect the object. For example, the block 701 occurs using the obstacle detector 410 in conjunction with one or more sets of camera data 418, 428 from at least one of the structured light cameras 218, 228.


At the block 702, the controller 320 determines whether the reflective object is within a threshold distance using, for example, the distance determiner 411 in conjunction with one or more sets of the ultrasound data 420 and/or the LIDAR data 421 (e.g. presuming that the one or more sets of camera data 418, 428 indicate that the object is not detected). In some embodiments, the threshold distance is set to a minimum distance at which the apparatus 103 is navigable around the object.


Furthermore, the block 702 is, in some embodiments, optional, and whether or not the block 702 is implemented is configurable at the apparatus 103.


When the object is not within the threshold distance (e.g. a “No” decision at the block 702), the block 701 repeats whenever an object is detected by the one or more ultrasound arrays 220. In particular, at the block 701, a determination of whether an object and the like is detected occurs periodically (for example, about every 100 ms) and, in some of these embodiments, a local “map” around the apparatus 103 is determined based on data from the structured light cameras 218, 228, the lidar device 221, the ultrasound arrays 220 and/or any other sensors used for detecting obstacles. The local “map” generally represents an obstacle landscape around the apparatus 103. In some of these embodiments, each cell of an occupancy grid (e.g. with cells of about 5 cm×5 cm) of the local map is reviewed by the controller 320 to determine whether or not an obstacle is present in each cell, according to the data received from the from the structured light cameras 218, 228, the lidar device 221, the ultrasound arrays 220. In these embodiments, the data from the ultrasound arrays 220 indicate an obstacle in a given cell, while the data from one or more of the structured light cameras 218, 228 indicate that there is no obstacle in the same given cell. However, other techniques for determining whether obstacles are detected by one or more of the ultrasound arrays 220, but not by at least one of the structured light cameras 218, 228 are within the scope of present embodiments.


However, when the object is within the threshold distance (e.g. a “Yes” decision at the block 702), at the block 703, the controller 320 controls the navigation module 340 to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 as described above with respect to the block 503 of the method 500. Indeed, put another way, the ultrasound arrays 220 are used to detect a false negative of the structured light cameras 218, 228 including, but not limited to, a false negative when detecting a shopping cart, or any other object having reflective and/or discontinuous surfaces (e.g., mesh surfaces) within a field of view of the structured light cameras 218, 228.


In some embodiments, when the structured light cameras 218, 228 provide an indication that an object is detected, corresponding data from the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 is ignored and/or not used. Indeed, as the ultrasounds arrays 220 generally provide a lower resolution of detection than the structured light cameras 218, 228 (e.g. ultrasound images are generally lower resolution than structured light camera images), in some embodiments, the controller 320 ignores ultrasound data when the structured light cameras 218, 228 detect an obstacle (e.g., to reduce use of processing resources and/or reduce processing overhead in obstacle detection).


In some embodiments, the control of the navigation module 340 further depends on the distance to the object. For example, when the object is within a first threshold distance, where the apparatus 103 is not navigable around the object and/or where a collision with the object may occur, the navigation module 340 is controlled to stop and/or slow down the apparatus 103. Similarly, when the object is within a second threshold distance, greater than the first threshold distance, where the apparatus 103 is navigable around the object, the navigation module 340 is controlled to navigate the apparatus 103 around the object. When the embodiment of block 703 causes the apparatus 103 to stop and/or slow down, once the object is at least at the second threshold distance (presuming the object is moving), the navigation module 340 is controlled to navigate the apparatus 103 around the object.


However, if the distance to the object does not change, and the apparatus 103 is stopped, in some embodiments the controller 320 controls the interface 324 to transmit a notification to the server 101 that the apparatus 103 has stopped. In an embodiment, the notification includes a location of the apparatus 103. Upon receipt of the notification, the server 101 transmits a notice to the mobile device 105 that the apparatus 103 is stopped and may also notify the mobile device 105 of the location of the apparatus 103; this can cause a user of the mobile device 105 to investigate why the apparatus 103 has stopped.


Alternatively, if the distance to the object does not change, and the apparatus 103 is stopped, after a given time period, the navigation module 340 is controlled to navigate the apparatus 103 to a position, relative to the object, where the object is at least at the second threshold distance (for example by moving the apparatus 103 in an opposite direction to a movement direction where the object was detected), and the apparatus 103 navigates around the object.


The method 700 repeats each time the controller 320 determines that the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 detects an object, and the structured light cameras 218, 228 simultaneously do not detect the object. Hence, the method 700 generally runs in parallel with other methods at the apparatus 103, including, for example other data detection methods (e.g. for detecting prices, barcodes, and the like) and/or navigation methods.


Indeed, the method 700 is generally executed in parallel with the method 500 and, in some embodiments, the method 500 is modified to include aspects of the method 700. For example, in some embodiments, the method 500 is modified such that when the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 detects an object, for example the shopping cart 603, and the structured light camera 218 simultaneously does not detect the object, for example the shopping cart 603, the navigation module 340 is controlled to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 and/the navigation module 340 is controlled to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol only when the object is within a threshold distance as described above.


The method 700 is now described with reference to FIG. 8, which is substantially similar to FIG. 6, with like elements having like numbers, but includes an object 803. For example, as depicted, the object 803 includes a person; however, the object 803 may also include a shopping cart and/or a person pushing a shopping cart, and/or any other obstacle that the apparatus 103 may encounter in an environment in which the apparatus 103 is navigating. The object 803 is at a distance from the apparatus 103 where the object 803 is not detectable by the structured light cameras 218, 228, but is generally detectable by one or more of the ultrasound arrays 220. The field of view of each of the ultrasound arrays 220 is indicated by broken lines (for clarity, different from the broken lines of the fields of view of the structured light cameras 218, 228 and the LIDAR device 221).


As the structured light cameras 218, 228 do not detect the object 803, but one or more of the ultrasound arrays 220 do detect the object 803, the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 is implemented, as described above. For example, attention is directed to FIG. 9 which schematically depicts a top view of the apparatus 103 and the object 803, as well as a path 901, 903 of the apparatus 103. Specifically, the path 901 represents the path of the apparatus 103 to a location where the object 803 is detected, and the path 903 represents the path of the apparatus 103 from the location where the object 803 is detected when the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 is implemented to navigate around the object 803. In particular, the apparatus 103 is navigated to a path 903 parallel to path 901, until the apparatus 103 is past the object 803, where the apparatus 103 is navigated back to a path coincident with the path 901. Put another way, the navigation module 340 is controlled to alter the navigation of the mobile automation apparatus 103 based on a comparison between ultrasound sensor data (e.g. from an ultrasound sensor 220) to structured light data (e.g. from one or more of the structured light cameras 218, 228). In some embodiments, the apparatus further transmits a notification of the alteration of the path (e.g. from the path 901 to the path 903) to the server 101, which may include a location of the apparatus 103.


In yet further embodiments, the controller 320 can be configured to recognize obstacle types; for example, when the object 803 comprises a shopping cart, a person, a display, and/or any object having a particular physical configuration that can be determined from data from the one or more of the ultrasound arrays 220 and/or the lidar device 221, the obstacle avoidance protocol can be object specific. For example, when the object 803 includes a person, the apparatus 103 can stop; however, when the object 803 includes a shopping cart (e.g. without a person), display, a pallet, and the like, the apparatus 803 can go around the object 803.


In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention.


For example, the method 700 is modified, in some embodiments, to control the navigation module 340 to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 when one or more of the structured light cameras 218, 228 and/or the LIDAR device 221 detect an object regardless of whether the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 detect the object. In other words, in some embodiments, the navigation module 340 to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol 412 whenever one or more of the structured light cameras 218, 228, the ultrasound arrays and the LIDAR device 221 detects an object, regardless of whether the other sensors detect an object.


For example, while each of the structured light cameras 218, 228 are described as facing in a forward direction (e.g. in a direction of movement of the apparatus 103), in another example, one or more of the structured light cameras 218, 228 are pointed in other directions, and/or the apparatus 103 further comprises other structured light cameras facing in other directions.


Furthermore, the fields of view of the structured light cameras 218, 228 are arranged, in some embodiments, such that a field of view of the structured light camera 218 is in a dead zone of the fields of view of the structured light cameras 228. For example, attention is next directed to FIG. 10 which schematically depicts the two structured light cameras 228 at the mast 214 (depicted in cross-section), as well as respective fields of views of the two structured light cameras 228 as broken lines extending therefrom. As the two structured light cameras 228 are pointing in different directions, their field of view do not overlap and indeed, there is a dead zone 1001 therebetween where objects are not imaged by the two structured light cameras 228. For example, the dead zone 1001 is, in some embodiments, in a direction of movement of the apparatus 103. However, the field of view 1003 of the structured light camera 218 (not depicted, but assumed to be oriented relative to the two structured light camera 228 as depicted in FIG. 2) is oriented in the dead zone 1001 of the two structured light cameras 228 such that objects not imaged by the two structured light cameras 228 are imaged by the structured light camera 218.


Indeed, such an arrangement can ensure that objects in a region adjacent to the apparatus 103 are detectable by the structured light camera 218, and that objects on either side of this region are detectable by the structured light cameras 228, Indeed, the relative orientations of the structured light cameras 218, 228, as well as the orientations of one or more LIDAR devices and/or depth sensing devices, and/or ultrasound arrays, are generally selected to increase a range over which objects around the apparatus 103 are detectable.


Furthermore, as the structured light camera 218 is pointed towards the floor 213, the structured light camera 218 further detects objects that are above or below the fields of view of each of the LIDAR device 221, the ultrasound arrays 220, and the structured light camera 228.


Indeed, as the apparatus 103 is, in some embodiments, configured to navigate in many directions, the sensors at the apparatus 103 are generally arranged to sense objects over the directions in which the apparatus 103 is configured to navigate.


For example, in some embodiments, the apparatus 103 is configured to move only longitudinally (e.g. forward and backward, as well as steering and/or turning in each of these directions) but not sideways (e.g. non-holonomic). In these embodiments, the sensors at the apparatus 103 are generally arranged to cover a range around the apparatus 103 over which the apparatus 103 is configured to move.


For example, the sensors described herein do not necessarily detect an entirety of an object and/or an obstacle, but rather the sensors are arranged to detect a portion and/or a region of the obstacle in order to infer structure sufficient to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol. Indeed, the sensors described herein are generally low cost readily available sensors, which are arranged to work together so that forward facing regions (e.g. in a movement direction) are generally covered by the sensors. For example, if LIDAR does not detect any part of an obstacle, then a structured light camera may detect part of the obstacle; however, if the structured light camera does not detect part of the obstacle, then the ultrasound arrays should detect at least a part of the obstacle. In other words, as the apparatus 103 is provisioned with three types of sensors for obstacle detection, the obstacle avoider 401 includes primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of obstacle detection.


The LIDAR devices described herein may have difficulties detecting light absorbing (black/dark) materials or highly reflective materials. Furthermore, the LIDAR devices described herein may be 2D (two-dimensional) planar sensors, which hence detect obstacles over a slice of the environment in which the apparatus 103 is navigating, and at ankle level.


Structured light cameras described herein may have difficulties detecting light absorbing (black/dark) materials or highly reflective materials. However, structured light cameras can otherwise detect a large percentage of the obstacles found in the retail environment. Ultrasound arrays and/or sensors may have issues detecting obstacles with high resolution since the sound waves are directed over a wide angle. However, ultrasound arrays and/or sensors very accurately detect highly reflective materials or very small objects.


Hence, in the apparatus described herein, a LIDAR device mounted at a front of the apparatus at ankle height is used to detect a large majority of the obstacles found at ankle height. Any obstacle found above or below ankle height is to be detected using a different sensor modality. Multiple structured light cameras (e.g. structured light cameras 228) are used to detect shoppers, aisle shelves, doors, baskets, shopping carts, items protruding from shelf, and any obstacle that is more than 1 m away from the apparatus 103 (and/or outside of a field of view of the structured light camera 218) and is in the range of the structured light cameras 228. However, in order to detect a shopping cart, the structured light camera 218 is placed at a height of about 1.5 m angled downwards at about 45 degrees, which allows for detecting a plastic protector ring on the top of a shopping cart. From the camera data captured by the structured light camera 228, at least the plastic protector ring of the shopping cart is detectable which allows the shopping cart to be avoided by the apparatus 103, as per the method 500.


However, as a failsafe, as per the method 700, the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 are used to detect obstacles within close proximity to the apparatus 103, for example, which, when detected, can cause the apparatus to stop and/or slow down (and/or prepare to stop and/or slow down), for example, when the obstacle is about 1 m from the apparatus 103. Indeed, the ultrasound sensors of the one or more ultrasound arrays 220 are, in some embodiments, positioned to form a phased ultrasound array which can detect shiny reflective obstacles such as reflective shopping cart meshes and/or lattices, within 1 m from the apparatus 103. Indeed, phased ultrasound array can further increase the obstacle detection resolution.


In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.


The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.


Moreover, in this document, language of “at least one of X, Y, and Z” and “one or more of X, Y and Z” can be construed as X only, Y only, Z only, or any combination of two or more items X, Y, and Z (e.g., XYZ, XY, YZ, XZ, and the like). Similar logic can be applied for two or more items in any occurrence of “at least one . . . ” and “one or more . . . ” language.


Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.


It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.


Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.


The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A mobile automation apparatus comprising: a mast extending in an upward direction;a navigation module configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in an environment;a structured light camera positioned on the mast, the structured light camera configured to detect an object in a vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus;one or more ultrasound arrays on the mast, each of the one or more ultrasound arrays configured to detect the object-in the vicinity; anda controller configured to: when the structured light camera detects the object, ignore ultrasound data from the one or more ultrasound arrays and select structured light data from the structured light camera as an input to an obstacle avoidance protocol;-when the one or more ultrasound arrays detect the object and the structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object in a same cell of an occupancy grid in the vicinity, select the ultrasound data from the one or more ultrasound arrays as the input to an obstacle avoidance protocol;determine an obstacle type of the object; andimplement the obstacle avoidance protocol based on the selected input and the obstacle type.
  • 2. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the object includes a reflective surface.
  • 3. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 2, wherein the surface is discontinuous.
  • 4. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 3, wherein the surface is a mesh surface of a shopping cart.
  • 5. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a base, the mast extending in the upward direction from the base; and one or more of a depth sensing device and a LIDAR device located at the base, and configured to sense depth at an ankle height.
  • 6. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, further comprising one or more second structured light cameras between a base of the mast and the structured light camera, the one or more second structured light cameras configured to detect objects over respective angles on either side of the vicinity.
  • 7. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the navigation module is configured to move the mobile automation apparatus in the environment in a forward direction, and the structured light camera is further configured to detect at least the object in the region in the forward direction.
  • 8. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a communication interface configured to transmit a notification of an alteration of a navigation of the mobile automation apparatus to a mobile device.
  • 9. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 8, wherein the notification includes a location of the mobile automation apparatus.
  • 10. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to implement the obstacle avoidance protocol when the object is within a threshold distance from the mobile automation apparatus.
  • 11. A method of obstacle avoidance by a mobile automation apparatus, the method comprising: detecting, by an ultrasound sensor of the mobile automation apparatus, ultrasound data representing a vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus;detecting, by a structured light camera of the mobile automation apparatus, structured light data representing the vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus;when the structured light data indicates an object is detected in the vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus, ignoring the ultrasound data and selecting the structured light data as an input to an obstacle avoidance protocol; andwhen the ultrasound data indicates an object is detected in a cell of an occupancy grid in the vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus when the structured light data simultaneously does not indicate the object is detected in the same cell of the occupancy grid: determining whether the object is within a threshold distance from the mobile automation apparatus; andwhen the object is within the threshold distance, selecting the ultrasound data as the input to the obstacle avoidance protocol;determining an obstacle type of the object; andimplementing the obstacle avoidance protocol based on the selected input and the obstacle type.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the object includes a reflective surface.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the surface is discontinuous.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the surface is a mesh surface.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the mesh surface is a surface of a shopping cart.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, further comprising transmitting a notification of an alteration of a navigation of the mobile automation apparatus to a mobile device.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the notification includes a location of the mobile automation apparatus.
  • 18. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions for obstacle avoidance by a mobile automation apparatus, the instructions to configure a controller of the mobile automation apparatus to: detect, by an ultrasound sensor of the mobile automation apparatus, ultrasound data representing a vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus;detect, by a structured light camera of the mobile automation apparatus, structured light data representing the vicinity of the mobile automation apparatus;when the structured light camera detects the object, ignore ultrasound data from the ultrasound sensor and select structured light data from the structured light camera as an input to an obstacle avoidance protocol;when the ultrasound sensor detects the object and the structured light camera simultaneously does not detect the object in a same cell of an occupancy grid in the vicinity, select the ultrasound data from the ultrasound sensor as the input to an obstacle avoidance protocol;determine an obstacle type of the object; andimplement the obstacle avoidance protocol based on the selected input and the obstacle type.
  • 19. The computer readable medium of claim 18, wherein the object includes a reflective surface.
  • 20. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the reflective surface is a mesh surface of a shopping cart.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/492,670 entitled “Product Status Detection System,” filed on May 1, 2017, by Perrella et al., and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/492,712 entitled “Obstacle Detection For A Mobile Automation Apparatus,” filed on May 1, 2017, by Arandorenko et al., all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (475)
Number Name Date Kind
5209712 Ferri May 1993 A
5214615 Bauer May 1993 A
5408322 Hsu et al. Apr 1995 A
5414268 McGee May 1995 A
5423617 Marsh et al. Jun 1995 A
5534762 Kim Jul 1996 A
5566280 Fukui et al. Oct 1996 A
5704049 Briechle Dec 1997 A
5953055 Huang et al. Sep 1999 A
5988862 Kacyra et al. Nov 1999 A
6026376 Kenney Feb 2000 A
6034379 Bunte et al. Mar 2000 A
6075905 Herman et al. Jun 2000 A
6115114 Berg et al. Sep 2000 A
6141293 Amorai-Moriya et al. Oct 2000 A
6304855 Burke Oct 2001 B1
6442507 Skidmore et al. Aug 2002 B1
6549825 Kurata Apr 2003 B2
6580441 Schileru-Key Jun 2003 B2
6711293 Lowe Mar 2004 B1
6721723 Gibson et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721769 Rappaport et al. Apr 2004 B1
6836567 Silver et al. Dec 2004 B1
6995762 Pavlidis et al. Feb 2006 B1
7090135 Patel Aug 2006 B2
7137207 Armstrong et al. Nov 2006 B2
7245558 Willins et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248754 Cato Jul 2007 B2
7277187 Smith et al. Oct 2007 B2
7373722 Cooper et al. May 2008 B2
7474389 Greenberg et al. Jan 2009 B2
7487595 Armstrong et al. Feb 2009 B2
7493336 Noonan Feb 2009 B2
7508794 Feather et al. Mar 2009 B2
7527205 Zhu et al. May 2009 B2
7605817 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 B2
7647752 Magnell Jan 2010 B2
7693757 Zimmerman Apr 2010 B2
7726575 Wang et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751928 Antony et al. Jul 2010 B1
7783383 Eliuk et al. Aug 2010 B2
7839531 Sugiyama Nov 2010 B2
7845560 Emanuel et al. Dec 2010 B2
7885865 Benson et al. Feb 2011 B2
7925114 Mai et al. Apr 2011 B2
7957998 Riley et al. Jun 2011 B2
7996179 Lee et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009864 Linaker et al. Aug 2011 B2
8049621 Egan Nov 2011 B1
8091782 Cato et al. Jan 2012 B2
8094902 Crandall et al. Jan 2012 B2
8094937 Teoh et al. Jan 2012 B2
8132728 Dwinell et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134717 Pangrazio et al. Mar 2012 B2
8189855 Opalach et al. May 2012 B2
8199977 Krishnaswamy et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207964 Meadow et al. Jun 2012 B1
8233055 Matsunaga et al. Jul 2012 B2
8260742 Cognigni et al. Sep 2012 B2
8265895 Willins et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277396 Scott et al. Oct 2012 B2
8284988 Sones et al. Oct 2012 B2
8423431 Rouaix et al. Apr 2013 B1
8429004 Hamilton et al. Apr 2013 B2
8463079 Ackley et al. Jun 2013 B2
8479996 Barkan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8520067 Ersue Aug 2013 B2
8542252 Perez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8571314 Tao et al. Oct 2013 B2
8599303 Stettner Dec 2013 B2
8630924 Groenevelt et al. Jan 2014 B2
8660338 Ma et al. Feb 2014 B2
8743176 Stettner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8757479 Clark et al. Jun 2014 B2
8812226 Zeng Aug 2014 B2
8923893 Austin et al. Dec 2014 B2
8939369 Olmstead et al. Jan 2015 B2
8954188 Sullivan et al. Feb 2015 B2
8958911 Wong et al. Feb 2015 B2
8971637 Rivard Mar 2015 B1
8989342 Liesenfelt et al. Mar 2015 B2
9007601 Steffey et al. Apr 2015 B2
9037287 Grauberger et al. May 2015 B1
9064394 Trundle Jun 2015 B1
9070285 Ramu et al. Jun 2015 B1
9072929 Rush et al. Jul 2015 B1
9120622 Elazary et al. Sep 2015 B1
9129277 Macintosh Sep 2015 B2
9135491 Morandi et al. Sep 2015 B2
9159047 Winkel Oct 2015 B2
9171442 Clements Oct 2015 B2
9247211 Zhang et al. Jan 2016 B2
9329269 Zeng May 2016 B2
9349076 Liu et al. May 2016 B1
9367831 Besehanic Jun 2016 B1
9380222 Clayton et al. Jun 2016 B2
9396554 Williams et al. Jul 2016 B2
9400170 Steffey Jul 2016 B2
9424482 Patel et al. Aug 2016 B2
9517767 Kentley et al. Dec 2016 B1
9542746 Wu et al. Jan 2017 B2
9549125 Goyal et al. Jan 2017 B1
9562971 Shenkar et al. Feb 2017 B2
9565400 Curlander et al. Feb 2017 B1
9589353 Mueller-Fischer et al. Mar 2017 B2
9600731 Yasunaga et al. Mar 2017 B2
9600892 Patel et al. Mar 2017 B2
9612123 Levinson Apr 2017 B1
9639935 Douady-Pleven et al. May 2017 B1
9697429 Patel et al. Jul 2017 B2
9766074 Roumeliotis et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778388 Connor Oct 2017 B1
9779205 Namir Oct 2017 B2
9791862 Connor Oct 2017 B1
9805240 Zheng et al. Oct 2017 B1
9811754 Schwartz Nov 2017 B2
9827683 Hance et al. Nov 2017 B1
9880009 Bell Jan 2018 B2
9928708 Lin et al. Mar 2018 B2
9953420 Wolski et al. Apr 2018 B2
9980009 Jiang et al. May 2018 B2
9994339 Colson et al. Jun 2018 B2
9996818 Ren et al. Jun 2018 B1
10019803 Venable et al. Jul 2018 B2
10111646 Nycz et al. Oct 2018 B2
10121072 Kekatpure Nov 2018 B1
10127438 Fisher et al. Nov 2018 B1
10133951 Mendonca et al. Nov 2018 B1
10197400 Jesudason et al. Feb 2019 B2
10210603 Venable et al. Feb 2019 B2
10229386 Thomas Mar 2019 B2
10248653 Blassin et al. Apr 2019 B2
10262294 Hahn et al. Apr 2019 B1
10265871 Hance et al. Apr 2019 B2
10289990 Rizzolo et al. May 2019 B2
10336543 Sills et al. Jul 2019 B1
10349031 DeLuca Jul 2019 B2
10352689 Brown et al. Jul 2019 B2
10373116 Medina et al. Aug 2019 B2
10394244 Song et al. Aug 2019 B2
20010031069 Kondo et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010041948 Ross et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020006231 Jayant et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020059202 Hadzikadic et al. May 2002 A1
20020097439 Braica Jul 2002 A1
20020146170 Rom Oct 2002 A1
20020158453 Levine Oct 2002 A1
20020164236 Fukuhara et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030003925 Suzuki Jan 2003 A1
20030094494 Blanford et al. May 2003 A1
20030174891 Wenzel et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040021313 Gardner et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040084527 Bong et al. May 2004 A1
20040131278 Imagawa et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040240754 Smith et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050016004 Armstrong et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050114059 Chang et al. May 2005 A1
20050174351 Chang Aug 2005 A1
20050213082 DiBernardo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213109 Schell et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060032915 Schwartz Feb 2006 A1
20060045325 Zavadsky et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064286 Fink et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060106742 Bochicchio et al. May 2006 A1
20060279527 Zehner et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285486 Roberts et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070036398 Chen Feb 2007 A1
20070074410 Armstrong et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070272732 Hindmon Nov 2007 A1
20080002866 Fujiwara Jan 2008 A1
20080025565 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027591 Lenser Jan 2008 A1
20080077511 Zimmerman Mar 2008 A1
20080159634 Sharma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164310 Dupuy et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175513 Lai et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181529 Michel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183730 Enga Jul 2008 A1
20080238919 Pack Oct 2008 A1
20080294487 Nasser Nov 2008 A1
20090009123 Skaff Jan 2009 A1
20090024353 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090057411 Madej et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090059270 Opalach et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090060349 Linaker et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063306 Fano et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063307 Groenovelt et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090074303 Filimonova et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088975 Sato et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103773 Wheeler et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125350 Lessing et al. May 2009 A1
20090125535 Basso et al. May 2009 A1
20090152391 McWhirk Jun 2009 A1
20090160975 Kwan Jun 2009 A1
20090192921 Hicks Jul 2009 A1
20090206161 Olmstead Aug 2009 A1
20090236155 Skaff Sep 2009 A1
20090252437 Li et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287587 Bloebaum et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090323121 Valkenburg et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100017407 Beniyama et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026804 Tanizaki et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100066587 Yamauchi Mar 2010 A1
20100070365 Siotia et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082194 Yabushita et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100091094 Sekowski Apr 2010 A1
20100118116 Tomasz et al. May 2010 A1
20100131234 Stewart et al. May 2010 A1
20100141806 Uemura et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161569 Schreter Jun 2010 A1
20100171826 Hamilton et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100208039 Setettner Aug 2010 A1
20100214873 Somasundaram et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235033 Yamamoto et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241289 Sandberg Sep 2010 A1
20100257149 Cognigni et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100295850 Katz et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100315412 Sinha et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100326939 Clark et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110047636 Stachon et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052043 Hyung et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093306 Nielsen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110137527 Simon et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168774 Magal Jul 2011 A1
20110172875 Gibbs Jul 2011 A1
20110188759 Filimonova et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110216063 Hayes Sep 2011 A1
20110242286 Pace et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246503 Bender et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110254840 Halstead Oct 2011 A1
20110286007 Pangrazio et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110288816 Thierman Nov 2011 A1
20110310088 Adabala et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120017028 Tsirkin Jan 2012 A1
20120019393 Wolinsky et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022913 VolKmann et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120051730 Cote et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069051 Hagbi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075342 Choubassi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120133639 Kopf et al. May 2012 A1
20120307108 Forutanpour Jun 2012 A1
20120169530 Padmanabhan et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179621 Moir et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185112 Sung et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120194644 Newcombe et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197464 Wang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120201466 Funayama et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209553 Doytchinov et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120236119 Rhee et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120249802 Taylor Oct 2012 A1
20120250978 Taylor Oct 2012 A1
20120269383 Bobbitt et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287249 Choo et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120323620 Hofman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130030700 Miller et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130076586 Karhuketo et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130090881 Janardhanan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130119138 Winkel May 2013 A1
20130132913 Fu et al. May 2013 A1
20130134178 Lu May 2013 A1
20130138246 Gutmann et al. May 2013 A1
20130138534 Herwig May 2013 A1
20130142421 Silver et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130144565 Miller Jun 2013 A1
20130154802 O'Haire et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130156292 Chang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130162806 Ding et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130169681 Rasane et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176398 Bonner et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130178227 Vartanian et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130182114 Zhang et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130226344 Wong et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130228620 Ahem et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130232039 Jackson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130235165 Gharib et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130235206 Smith et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130236089 Litvak et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130278631 Border et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130299306 Jiang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130299313 Baek, IV et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130300729 Grimaud Nov 2013 A1
20130303193 Dharwada et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130321418 Kirk Dec 2013 A1
20130329013 Metois et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130341400 Lancaster-Larocque Dec 2013 A1
20130342363 Paek et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002597 Taguchi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140003655 Gopalkrishnan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140003727 Lortz et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140006229 Birch et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140016832 Kong et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019311 Tanaka Jan 2014 A1
20140025201 Ryu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140028837 Gao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140047342 Breternitz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140049616 Stettner Feb 2014 A1
20140052555 MacIntosh Feb 2014 A1
20140086483 Zhang et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140098094 Neumann et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100813 Shaowering Apr 2014 A1
20140104413 McCloskey et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140112537 Frank et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140129027 Schnittman May 2014 A1
20140156133 Cullinane et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140161359 Magri et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140192050 Qiu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140195095 Flohr et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140195374 Bassemir et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214547 Signorelli et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214600 Argue et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140267614 Ding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267688 Aich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277691 Jacobus et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277692 Buzan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279294 Field-Darragh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140300637 Fan et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140316875 Tkachenko et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140330835 Boyer Nov 2014 A1
20140344401 Varney et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140351073 Murphy et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140369607 Patel et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150015602 Beaudoin Jan 2015 A1
20150019391 Kumar et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029339 Kobres et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032304 Nakamura et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150039458 Reid Feb 2015 A1
20150052029 Wu et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150088618 Basir et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088701 Desmarais et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088703 Yan Mar 2015 A1
20150092066 Geiss et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106403 Haverinen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117788 Patel et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150139010 Jeong et al. May 2015 A1
20150154467 Feng et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150161793 Takahashi Jun 2015 A1
20150170256 Pettyjohn et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150181198 Baele et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150212521 Pack Jul 2015 A1
20150235157 Avegliano et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150245358 Schmidt Aug 2015 A1
20150262116 Katircioglu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150279035 Wolski et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150298317 Wang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310601 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150332368 Vartiainen et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150352721 Wicks et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150353280 Brazeau et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150355639 Versteeg et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150363625 Wu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150363758 Wu Dec 2015 A1
20150365660 Wu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150379704 Chandrasekar et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160026253 Bradski et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160042223 Suh et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160044862 Kocer Feb 2016 A1
20160061591 Pangrazio et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160070981 Sasaki et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160092943 Vigier et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160012588 Taguchi et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160104041 Bowers et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160107690 Oyama et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160112628 Super et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160114488 Mascorro Medina Apr 2016 A1
20160129592 Saboo May 2016 A1
20160132815 Itoko et al. May 2016 A1
20160150217 Popov May 2016 A1
20160156898 Ren et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160163067 Williams et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160171336 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160171429 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160171707 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160185347 Lefevre et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191759 Somanath et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160221549 Tanase Aug 2016 A1
20160224927 Pettersson Aug 2016 A1
20160253735 Scudillo et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160253844 Petrovskaya et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160259329 High et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160260051 Wu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160260054 High et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160271795 Vicenti Sep 2016 A1
20160313133 Zeng et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160328618 Patel et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160328767 Bonner et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160353099 Thomson et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160364634 Davis et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170004649 Collet Romea et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170011281 Dijkman et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170011308 Sun et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032311 Rizzolo et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170041553 Cao et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170054965 Raab et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170066459 Singh Mar 2017 A1
20170074659 Giurgiu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170083774 Solar et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170109940 Guo et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170147966 Aversa et al. May 2017 A1
20170150129 Pangrazio May 2017 A1
20170178060 Schwartz Jun 2017 A1
20170178227 Gornish Jun 2017 A1
20170178310 Gornish Jun 2017 A1
20170193434 Shah et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170219338 Brown et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170219353 Alesiani Aug 2017 A1
20170227645 Swope et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170227647 Baik Aug 2017 A1
20170228885 Baumgartner Aug 2017 A1
20170261993 Venable et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262724 Wu et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170280125 Brown et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170286773 Skaff et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170286901 Skaff et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170297478 Sherman et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170323253 Enssle et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170323376 Glaser et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170337508 Bogolea et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180001481 Shah et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005035 Bogolea et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005176 Williams et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180020145 Kotfis et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180051991 Hong Feb 2018 A1
20180053091 Savvides et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180053305 Gu et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180075403 Mascorro Medina et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180089613 Chen et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180101813 Paat et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108120 Venable et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108134 Venable et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180114183 Howell Apr 2018 A1
20180129201 Douglas et al. May 2018 A1
20180130011 Jacobsson May 2018 A1
20180143003 Clayton et al. May 2018 A1
20180174325 Fu et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180190160 Bryan et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180197139 Hill Jul 2018 A1
20180201423 Drzewiecki et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180204111 Zadeh et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180218218 Madan et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180251253 Taira et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180276596 Murthy et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180281191 Sinyayskiy et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180293442 Fridental et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180293543 Tiwari Oct 2018 A1
20180306958 Goss et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180313956 Rzeszutek et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180314260 Jen et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180314908 Lam Nov 2018 A1
20180315007 Kingsford et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315065 Zhang et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315173 Phan et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315865 Haist et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180321692 Castillo-Effen et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180370727 Hance et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190049962 Ouellette et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190057588 Savvides et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190065861 Savvides et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190073554 Rzeszutek Mar 2019 A1
20190073559 Rzeszutek et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190073627 Nakdimon et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190077015 Shibasaki et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190087663 Yamazaki et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190094876 Moore et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190108606 Komiyama Apr 2019 A1
20190160675 Paschall, II et al. May 2019 A1
20190178436 Mao et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190180150 Taylor et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190197439 Wang Jun 2019 A1
20190197728 Yamao Jun 2019 A1
20190236530 Cantrell et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190271984 Kingsford Sep 2019 A1
20190304132 Yoda et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190392212 Sawhney et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200053325 Deyle et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200314333 Liang et al. Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
2835830 Nov 2012 CA
3028156 Jan 2018 CA
102214343 Oct 2011 CN
104200086 Dec 2014 CN
105989512 Oct 2016 CN
107067382 Aug 2017 CN
206952978 Feb 2018 CN
766098 Apr 1997 EP
1311993 May 2007 EP
2309378 Apr 2011 EP
2439487 Apr 2012 EP
2472475 Jul 2012 EP
2562688 Feb 2013 EP
2662831 Nov 2013 EP
2693362 Feb 2014 EP
3400113 Nov 2018 EP
3001567 Aug 2014 FR
2323238 Sep 1998 GB
2330265 Apr 1999 GB
2014170431 Sep 2014 JP
2016194834 Nov 2016 JP
2017016539 Jan 2017 JP
101234798 Jan 2009 KR
1020190031431 Mar 2019 KR
WO 9923600 May 1999 WO
WO 2003002935 Jan 2003 WO
WO 2003025805 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2006136958 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007042251 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2008057504 May 2008 WO
WO 2008154611 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2012103199 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2012103202 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2012154801 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2013165674 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014066422 May 2014 WO
WO 2014092552 Jun 2014 WO
WO 2014181323 Nov 2014 WO
WO 2015127503 Sep 2015 WO
WO 2016020038 Feb 2016 WO
WO 2017175312 Oct 2017 WO
WO 2017187106 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2018018007 Jan 2018 WO
WO 2018204308 Nov 2018 WO
WO 2018204342 Nov 2018 WO
WO 2019023249 Jan 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (105)
Entry
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn.
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014.
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006.
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641.
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8.
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012.
Bohm, Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Façade Texturing, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004).
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114.
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700.
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017.
Olson, Clark F., etal. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010.
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970.
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, p. 176-181.
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive rfid in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009).
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Technology, v2nl0, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013).
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333.
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital Image processing, 10-image enhancement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551.
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011.
Rusu, et al. “How to incrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php.
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php].
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1981).
Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation—A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2 (May 2009).
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011, pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017 [http://szeliski.org/book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf].
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,”International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253.
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counters, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=p.
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visualization”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013).
Uchiyama, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010).
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated May 13, 2020 for GB Patent Application No. 1917864.9.
Varol Gul et al.: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (Siu), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014.
Varol Gul et al.: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015).
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010).
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (Cybcon), IEEE, (Jan. 21, 2017).
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221.
Fan Zhang et al., “Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, 2014 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 4321-4328.
Kaimo Lin et al., “SEAGULL: Seam-guided Local Alignment for Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2020 [http://publish.illinois.edu/visual-modeling-and-analytics/files/2016/08/Seagull.pdf].
Julio Zaragoza et al., “As-Projective-As-Possible Image Stitching with Moving DLT”, 2013 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 2339-2346.
Zeng et al., Multi-view Self Supervised Deep Learning for 6D Pose Estimation in the Amazon Picking Challenge, May 7, 2017. Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2019 [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.09475.pdf].
Zhang et al., “Mobile computing and industrial augmented reality for real-time data access”, Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2001, 8th IEEE International Conference on Oct. 15-18, 2001, pp. 583-588, vol. 2.
Castorena et al., “Autocalibration of lidar and optical cameras via edge alignment”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Mar. 20, 2016).
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp. 3656-3663, 2017.
Cleveland Jonas et al.: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017).
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984.
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009.
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France.
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011.
Dubois, M., et al., “A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods,” European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, Sep. 25-27, 2013.
Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan. 1972).
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176- p. 178.
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013.
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference On, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010).
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24, 1984.
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009.
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,”IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9.
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, V191, pp. 148-160 (2016).
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2017/083143 dated Feb. 11, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030419 dated Aug. 31, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/049761 dated Nov. 15, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/051312 dated Nov. 15, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/054103 dated Jan. 6, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/064020 dated Feb. 19, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/027948 dated Jul. 16, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028133 dated Jul. 24, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/029134 dated Jul. 27, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028183 dated Jul. 24, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/035285 dated Aug. 27, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/024805 dated Aug. 2, 2021.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/057388 dated Feb. 2, 2022.
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of science and research v 5 n 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016).
Jian Fan et al: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2014), pp. 1575-1578.
Kaikai Liu et al., “Enabling Context-Aware Indoor Augmented Reality via Smartphone Sensing and Vision Tracking”, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, Association for Computer Machinery, US, vol. 12, No.
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121.
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986.
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonomic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013).
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada.
Lecking et al.: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008).
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985.
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017).
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009).
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307.
McNaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011).
Meyersohn, “Walmart turns to robots and apps in stores”, https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/07/business/walmart-robot-janitors-dotcom-store/index.html, Oct. 29, 2019.
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data,” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328.
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25.
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, V8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016).
Norriof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,503 dated Mar. 11, 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180314261 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62492670 May 2017 US
62492712 May 2017 US