Various exemplary embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to computer-based methods and apparatuses, including computer program products, for an occasionally-connected computing interface.
Companies can use servers to provide services to remote computers (e.g., online services) through interfaces on the remote computers. For example, a user can access the services by loading a webpage on a local computer that interfaces with the servers. The webpage can include a number of controls, such as buttons, widgets, menu items, etc. that allow the user to access and interact with the remotely-located server(s) to access the full-range of services provided by the servers. As another example, the user can access the services by loading a program or other executable on the user's computer that is configured to interact with the services provided by the remotely-located servers. The executable can be similar to the webpage—the executable generates a graphical user interface (GUI) with various controls that allow the user to invoke the features of the service provided by the remote servers.
With the explosion of smart phones, personal digital assistants, tablets, and other mobile devices, the processing and display capabilities of these devices are often powerful enough to run similar executables on the mobile devices that can interface with the remote servers. However, such programs or executables often consume a large amount of the mobile device's processing power, memory, etc., causing the mobile device's performance to decrease. Further, many of these programs can not be run on earlier-model mobile devices, which do not have sufficient processing power.
The computerized methods and apparatus disclosed herein allow a user to invoke the full functionality of a service (e.g., that which is often utilized using a graphical interface at the user's computer, including various buttons, menu items, etc.) using a mobile device's messaging service (e.g., MMS, SMS). The user can further seamlessly switch between using the mobile device and the user's computer to interact with the service, without any impact on the user's session with the service and/or sessions with other remote computers (e.g., existing online chat sessions between the user, whether established through the user's mobile phone or computer, and the remote computers).
In one embodiment, a computerized method is featured. The computerized method allows a user to switch between interfacing with a service through a network or through short message service (SMS). The method includes executing, by a server computer, a chat service through which a first user at a first computer can communicate directly with a second user at a second computer, both the first computer and the second computer communicating with the chat service through a network. The method includes receiving from the first computer, by the server computer, a request to enable the first user to interface with the chat service through a mobile device of the first user using short message service (SMS) instead of through the network using the first computer. The method includes configuring, by the server computer, the chat service to interface with the mobile device through SMS, including (a) communicating chat information through SMS to the first user's mobile device and communicating chat information through the network to the second computer such that the second user is unaware the first user switched to using the mobile device instead of the first computer, and (b) communicating control information through SMS to the first user's mobile device such that the first user can control a full functionality of the chat service using SMS.
In another embodiment, a computer program product, tangibly embodied in a non-transitory computer-readable medium is featured. The computer program product includes instructions being configured to cause a data-processing apparatus to execute a chat service through which a first user at a first computer can communicate directly with a second user at a second computer, both the first computer and the second computer communicating with the chat service through a network. The computer program product includes instructions being configured to cause a data-processing apparatus to receive from the first computer a request to enable the first user to interface with the chat service through a mobile device of the first user using short message service (SMS) instead of through the network using the first computer. The computer program product includes instructions being configured to cause a data-processing apparatus to configure the chat service to interface with the mobile device through SMS, including (a) communicating chat information through SMS to the first user's mobile device and communicating chat information through the network to the second computer such that the second user is unaware the first user switched to using the mobile device instead of the first computer, and (b) communicating control information through SMS to the first user's mobile device such that the first user can control a full functionality of the chat service using SMS.
In another embodiment, a server computer is featured. The server computer allows a user to switch between interfacing with a service through a network or through short message service (SMS). The server computer includes a processor and memory. The server computer is configured to execute a chat service through which a first user at a first computer can communicate directly with a second user at a second computer, both the first computer and the second computer communicating with the chat service through a network. The server computer is configured to receive from the first computer a request to enable the first user to interface with the chat service through a mobile device of the first user using short message service (SMS) instead of through the network using the first computer. The server computer is configured to configure the chat service to interface with the mobile device through SMS, including (a) communicating chat information through SMS to the first user's mobile device and communicating chat information through the network to the second computer such that the second user is unaware the first user switched to using the mobile device instead of the first computer, and (b) communicating control information through SMS to the first user's mobile device such that the first user can control a full functionality of the chat service using SMS.
In other examples, any of the aspects above can include one or more of the following features. A request can be received from the first user's mobile device to interface with the chat service at a third computer instead of the mobile device, and the chat service can be configured to interface with the third computer. Configuring can include (a) communicating chat information through the network to the third computer and communicating chat information through the network to the second computer such that the second user is unaware that the first user switched to using the third computer instead of the mobile device, and (b) communicating control information through the network to the third computer such that the first user can use the full functionality of the chat service using the network.
In some examples, configuring the chat service to interface with the first user includes maintaining any chat sessions between the first user and the second user, any other users, or any combination thereof. Receiving the request can include receiving a request from the first user to change a status of the first user from online mode to mobile mode. All communications can be sent to the first user's mobile device using SMS.
In other examples, an SMS request is received from the first user's mobile device to start a chat conversation with a third user at a third computer, and chat information is communicated through SMS to the first user's mobile device and communicating chat information to the third computer. Communicating chat information through SMS to the first computer can include receiving a chat message from the second computer, and transmitting, using SMS, the chat message, and a chat identifier to the first user's mobile device.
The techniques, which include both methods and apparatuses, described herein can provide one or more of the following advantages. A service (e.g., provided by a server) can be accessed by a broad range of devices and communication protocols, including a mobile phone's messaging service. The user of the service can seamlessly switch between devices while interacting with the service, giving the user a greater flexibility to stay connected to the service using different devices and communication protcols. Additionally, by using a messaging service on the mobile device instead of a stand-alone application or executable, the user can continue using the full-range of services without bogging down the resources of the mobile device.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating the principles of the invention by way of example only.
The foregoing and other aspects, features, and advantages will be more fully understood from the following description of various embodiments, when read together with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like components or steps, there are disclosed broad aspects of various exemplary embodiments.
In general overview, computerized systems and methods are provided for allowing a user to switch between interfacing with a service (e.g., a service provided by a remotely-located server) through a device networked to the service (e.g., a desktop, personal computer, laptop, etc. connected to the server via the internet or other type of network) or a mobile device using the mobile device's message service (e.g., short messaging service, blackberry messaging service, etc.). Further, the user can access the full range of services provided by the remote computer using the mobile device's messaging service.
While various examples described herein use the term “agent,” the term is intended to be used broadly and should be understood to refer to a user of the services (e.g., provided by a remote server). Therefore, the phase “occasionally-connected user interface” addresses an interface that allows a user of a service to interface with the service using various devices (e.g., the agent can connect to the services using his desktop, mobile phone, and/or other devices via different communication interfaces).
The communication server 101 provides a number of services to remote users (e.g., agent computer 120, via the agent console 140, mobile device 130, etc.). The agent can interact with the services to establish communications with the visitor computer 110 (and/or other visitors, not shown). For example, the communication server 101 can initiate a connection between an agent (e.g., using the agent computer 120) and a website visitor (e.g., using the visitor computer 110) through the network 103. For example, the communication server 101 can initiate an online chat session between the visitor computer 110 and either the mobile device 130 (used by the agent) or the agent computer 120 (used by the agent). Over the course of the chat session, the agent can seamlessly switch, via the communication server 101, which device the agent is using to communicate with the visitor computer (e.g., switch from using the agent computer 120 to chat with the visitor computer 110, to using the mobile device 130) such that the visitor does not detect the agent's change of device (e.g., as indicated with dotted line 150).
Communication server 101 can be, for example, a single web server with a processor and memory. In some embodiments, the communication server 101 can include multiple web servers connected directly or through the network 103. The communication server 101 can be configured to provide a number of services to users (e.g., to agent computer 120 and/or other agent computers, not shown). The services can include, for example, services that allow the agent to provide customer service, help, and/or recommendations to the visitors (e.g., visitors to a website) and to manage the associated connections with visitors. For example, the communication server 101 can establish a communication between the visitor computer 110 and the agent computer 120. For example, the communication server 101 can establish an online chat help session between the agent computer 120 and the visitor computer 110 (e.g., in response to a visitor clicking a chat button on a web page displayed in the visitor browser 111, automatically based on predetermined criteria configured in the tag module 113, etc.).
The communication server 101 can be configured to provide certain functionality to the agent through the agent console 140 via the set of features 141. For example, if an agent types a message using the agent console 140 to send to a visitor, the communication server 101 can process the agent's actions and transmit the message to the visitor (e.g., via a an online chat session established by the communication server 101). The agent console 140 is described in further detail below. The communication server 101 is further configured to provide the same functionality to the agent through the agent's mobile device using a messaging service.
Network 103 can be, for example, a packet-switching network that is able to forward packets to other devices based on information included in the packet. The network 103 can provide, for example, phone and/or Internet service to various devices, like the user device 101 and the agent computer 120 in communication with the network 103.
The visitor computer 110 can be a personal computer (e.g., a PC or a laptop) including a processor and memory. In some examples, the visitor computer 110 is a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a tablet PC, and/or any another computing device capable of interacting with the communication server 101. In some examples, the visitor computer 110 is a computing device capable of viewing web content using a web browser (e.g., the visitor browser 111). The web content can be served by one or more web content servers (not shown). The web content can cause the tag module 113 to be loaded in the visitor browser 111, as is described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/080,324, entitled “System and Method for Dynamically Enabling Customized Web Content and Applications,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Agent computer 120 can be a personal computer with a processor and memory that is sufficient to execute the agent console 140 (e.g., through the agent browser 121 as a web application, or as a stand-alone application on the agent computer 120). Mobile device 130 can be, for example, a phone, tablet, or similar portable device that is able to send and receive messages. In some embodiments, the mobile device 130 is a device capable of sending and receiving text messages through a messaging service, such as the short messaging service (SMS).
The agent console 140 is, for example, an interface that allows the agent (using the agent computer 120) to perform various functions by accessing services provided by the communication server 101. These functions can be related to interacting with visitors. For example, the functions can include (i) monitoring a number of visitors (e.g., visitors to a website) that have requested assistance from agents (and the status thereof, such as chatting, waiting for chat, etc.), (ii) chatting with a particular visitor, (iii) placing an outbound call to the visitor, (iv) emailing with a visitor, (v) drafting notes (e.g., to associate with a visitor (such as notes about a chat or call) or for the agent's use), (vi) viewing alerts presented to the visitor (e.g., pop-up ads, invitations for online chat, etc.), (vii) controlling a ticket associated with a visitor (e.g., to track the progress of agent interaction with a visitor), (viii) viewing the web history of the visitor, and/or the like.
The interaction portion 408 includes a chat function 414 that allows the agent to chat with the selected visitor (e.g., as shown in the chat console 414A), a phone function 416 that allows the agent to call the visitor, an email function 418 that allows the agent to email with the visitor, a note function 420 that allows the agent to take notes, and a log call function 422 that allows the agent to log information about a call (e.g., made with the phone function 416). The information portion 410 includes various tabs that provide information about a selected visitor, including alerts, InteliResponse, Info, Navigation, Page Viewer, and Knowledgebase Monitor. For example, the information tab 410A shows various information for the selected visitor Robyn MacNab 412. Agent console 400 is an illustrative example of an agent console, and one of skill in the art can appreciate that different features can be included and/or excluded from the agent console without departing from the spirit of the invention.
The system 100 is an example of a computerized system that is specially configured to perform the computerized methods described herein. However, the system structure and content recited with regard to
In addition, information may flow between the elements, components and subsystems described herein using any technique. Such techniques include, for example, passing the information over the network using standard protocols, such as TCP/IP, passing the information between modules in memory and passing the information by writing to a file, database, or some other non-volatile storage device. In addition, pointers or other references to information may be transmitted and received in place of, or in addition to, copies of the information. Conversely, the information may be exchanged in place of, or in addition to, pointers or other references to the information. Other techniques and protocols for communicating information may be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
While method 200 is described with step 203, the agent need not have a communication initiated between the agent and a customer to switch the agent's device (e.g., as described with reference to steps 205-209). Referring to step 203, for example, the communication server 101 can set up an online chat between the agent computer 120 and the visitor at the visitor computer 110. The communication server 101 can set up the chat session such that both the agent computer 120 and the visitor computer 110 communicate through the network 103. For example, the communication server 101 can provide a chat window to the visitor through the visitor browser 111 for the visitor to participate in the chat session. The agent can use the agent console 140 to participate in the chat session (e.g., using the chat function 414 of the agent console 400 shown in
Referring to step 205, the agent can indicate (e.g., via the agent console 140) that the agent would like to switch to interacting with the agent console functionality through mobile device 130 instead of through the agent computer 120. For example, the communication server 101 receives, from the agent computer 120 (e.g., via user selection of a function on the agent console 140), a request to enable the agent to interface with the services provided by the communication server 101 through the mobile device 130 (e.g., using short message service (SMS)) instead of through the agent computer 120 (e.g., using the agent console 140).
For example, the communication server 101 can receive a request from the agent console 140 to change a status of the agent using the agent computer 120 from “online” mode (e.g., connected to the communication server 101 via a computer network) to “mobile” mode (e.g., connected to the communication server 101 via a network that includes telephone components, such as SMS gateway 131). The communication server 101 can allow the user to access the agent console functionality (e.g., as provided by the communication server 101) through SMS messaging (e.g., for both messages being sent to the communication server 101 and transmitted from the communication server 101 to the mobile device 130).
In some embodiments, the communication server 101 can receive the request from the agent computer 120. In such examples, the communication server 101 can first suspend messages from being sent to the agent computer 120 before proceeding to step 207. In some embodiments, the communication server 101 receives the transfer request from the mobile device 130 (e.g., as is described below with respect to
The agent can request the transfer using the agent console 140. For example, the agent can change a status associated with the agent from “online” to “mobile” to switch to using the mobile device 130. In response, the communication server 101 can switch to interacting with the mobile device 130 via SMS (e.g., all communications, such as chat messages and control information, are transmitted to the mobile device 130 via SMS). If, for example, the agent has incoming chats, the communication server 101 can support multiple chats via SMS capabilities.
Referring to step 207, the communication server 101 configures the services it is providing to interface with the agent via the mobile device 130. In some examples, the communication server 101 includes an application programmer interface (API) that is used to invoke the services provided by the communication server 101. The communication server 101 can configure the API, if necessary, to interface with the mobile device 130 instead of the agent console 140.
In some examples, the communication server 130 interfaces with the mobile device 130 through SMS. For example, when the communication server 101 receives the transfer request in step 205, the communication server 101 can establish a connection between the visitor's computer 110 and the mobile device 130 via the SMS gateway 131.
By using SMS instead of a stand-alone application or program allows the user to continue using the full-range of services provided by the communication server 130 without bogging down the resources of the mobile device 130. While some examples herein describe using SMS as the messaging service, other messaging services can also be used. For example, depending on the type of mobile device 130 used (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Blackberry, Android) the communication server 101 can transmit messages using the specific messaging service employed by the mobile device 130. For example, the messaging can be performed using Java, Blackberry Messenger (BBM), multimedia messaging service (MMS), and/or other services that do not require running a separate program or executable on the mobile device 130.
The information the communication server 101 transmits to the mobile device 130 can include identifiers for the information. The identifiers can allow the agent to understand the meaning of the information as it relates to services provided by the communication server 101 (e.g., whether the information relates to chat, relates to control functions, etc.). For example, for chat sessions, each message can be prefixed with the chat number (e.g., “chat 1”, “chat 2”, etc.), a chat name (e.g., “Robyn MacNab” as sown in
Referring to step 209, the communication server 101 communicates agent console information to the agent's mobile device 130 through the messaging service. The information can include, for example chat information. The communication server 101 can perform step 207 such that step 209 occurs without any impact on the visitor. For example, the communication server 101 can transition to communicating with the agent's mobile device 130 through SMS while still communicating information (e.g., chat information) through the network 100 to the visitor computer 110 such that the visitor is unaware the agent switched to using the mobile device 130 instead of the agent computer 120.
The information can include control information. For example, the communication server 101 can communicate control information through SMS to the mobile device 130 such that the agent can use the full functionality provided by the communication server 101 (e.g., that explained with reference to the agent console 400
For example, the agent can start a new online chat with a new visitor via the agent's mobile device 130. Using SMS for this example, the communication server 101 receives an SMS request from the agent's mobile device 130 to start a chat conversation with the new user (e.g., using a second visitor computer (not shown). The communication server 101 can communicating chat information through SMS to the agent's mobile device 130 and communicate chat information to the visitor computer 110. For example, the communication server 101 can receive a chat message from the visitor computer 110 with a destination address being that of the agent. The communication server 101 can determine that the agent is using the mobile device 130, and transmit, using SMS, the chat message, and a chat identifier to the first user's mobile device. The agent can use the chat identifier to know which visitor transmitted the chat message. The communication server 101 can receive both chat messages sent from the mobile device 130, as well as control messages from the mobile device 130 (e.g., via the gateway 131) in order to provide the agent full functionality of the agent console from the mobile device 130.
At step 305, the communication server 101 receives a request to transfer the agent's interaction with the agent console functionality from the mobile device 130 (e.g., via SMS messaging) to the agent computer 120 (or another computer, not shown). For example, if the agent is communicating with the visitor via online chat, the communication server 101 can receive a request from the agent's mobile device 130 to maintain the chat service with the visitor, but to interface with the chat service at the agent computer 120 instead of the mobile device 130.
At step 307, the communication server 101 configures the services to interface with the agent at the agent computer 120. For example, to maintain an existing chat with the visitor computer 110 during the transfer, the communication server 101 can configure the chat service to interface with the agent console 104 being executed on the agent computer 120 (e.g., via the chat console 414A of
The communication server 101 can allow the agent to interface with the services provided by the communication server 101 while preserving any settings, communications, etc. that the agent has configured via one or more devices. For example, if a user invokes a first setting while using the mobile device 130, and then invokes a second setting after switching to the agent computer 120, the agent still has the first setting configured by the mobile device 130. Additionally, the communication server 101 can maintain any communications between the agent and third parties (e.g., the visitor computer 110 and/or any other computers). For example, the communication server 101 can maintain any existing chat sessions between the agent and the visitor computer 110 and/or any other users.
Allowing the agent to interface with the agent console functionality through the mobile device 130 using a messaging service can increase performance of the mobile device 130. For example, requiring the mobile device 130 to run an application (e.g., as an app for an iPhone, which controls and manages all the calls to the communication server 101 (e.g., in order to receive notifications and incoming chat)) instead of using a messaging service (e.g., SMS) would consume a lot of the mobile phone's resources. The communication server 101 can provide access to the full agent console functionality via messaging, which does not consume much resources of the mobile device 130.
As an illustrative example, assume the agent is a car dealer, and the agent is in his office chatting with potential customers online. Then the car dealer notices a person browsing the vehicles in his lot, and needs to leave his computer to assist the customer. To maintain the chats with the online customers, the car dealer sets his profile to “mobile,” (e.g., using the agent console 400 of
The above-described techniques can be implemented in digital and/or analog electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. The implementation can be as a computer program product, i.e., a computer program tangibly embodied in a machine-readable storage device, for execution by, or to control the operation of, a data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, and/or multiple computers. A computer program can be written in any form of computer or programming language, including source code, compiled code, interpreted code and/or machine code, and the computer program can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a subroutine, element, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one or more sites.
Method steps can be performed by one or more processors executing a computer program to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and/or generating output data. Method steps can also be performed by, and an apparatus can be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., a FPGA (field programmable gate array), a FPAA (field-programmable analog array), a CPLD (complex programmable logic device), a PSoC (Programmable System-on-Chip), ASIP (application-specific instruction-set processor), or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). Subroutines can refer to portions of the computer program and/or the processor/special circuitry that implement one or more functions.
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital or analog computer. Generally, a processor receives instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and/or data. Memory devices, such as a cache, can be used to temporarily store data. Memory devices can also be used for long-term data storage. Generally, a computer also includes, or is operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. A computer can also be operatively coupled to a communications network in order to receive instructions and/or data from the network and/or to transfer instructions and/or data to the network. Computer-readable storage devices suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of volatile and non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., DRAM, SRAM, EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks, e.g., CD, DVD, HD-DVD, and Blu-ray disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by and/or incorporated in special purpose logic circuitry.
To provide for interaction with a user, the above described techniques can be implemented on a computer in communication with a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube), plasma, or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse, a trackball, a touchpad, or a motion sensor, by which the user can provide input to the computer (e.g., interact with a user interface element). Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, and/or tactile input.
The above described techniques can be implemented in a distributed computing system that includes a back-end component. The back-end component can, for example, be a data server, a middleware component, and/or an application server. The above described techniques can be implemented in a distributed computing system that includes a front-end component. The front-end component can, for example, be a client computer having a graphical user interface, a Web browser through which a user can interact with an example implementation, and/or other graphical user interfaces for a transmitting device. The above described techniques can be implemented in a distributed computing system that includes any combination of such back-end, middleware, or front-end components.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and a server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
The components of the computing system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital or analog data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include circuit-based and packet-based networks. Packet-based networks can include, for example, the Internet, a carrier internet protocol (IP) network (e.g., local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), campus area network (CAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), home area network (HAN)), a private IP network, an IP private branch exchange (IPBX), a wireless network (e.g., radio access network (RAN), 802.11 network, 802.16 network, general packet radio service (GPRS) network, HiperLAN), and/or other packet-based networks. Circuit-based networks can include, for example, the public switched telephone network (PSTN), a private branch exchange (PBX), a wireless network (e.g., RAN, bluetooth, code-division multiple access (CDMA) network, time division multiple access (TDMA) network, global system for mobile communications (GSM) network), and/or other circuit-based networks.
Devices of the computing system and/or computing devices can include, for example, a computer, a computer with a browser device, a telephone, an IP phone, a mobile device (e.g., cellular phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) device, laptop computer, electronic mail device), a server, a rack with one or more processing cards, special purpose circuitry, and/or other communication devices. The browser device includes, for example, a computer (e.g., desktop computer, laptop computer) with a world wide web browser (e.g., Microsoft® Internet Explorer® available from Microsoft Corporation, Mozilla® Firefox available from Mozilla Corporation). A mobile computing device includes, for example, a Blackberry®. IP phones include, for example, a Cisco® Unified IP Phone 7985G available from Cisco System, Inc, and/or a Cisco® Unified Wireless Phone 7920 available from Cisco System, Inc.
One skilled in the art will realize the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting of the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4881261 | Oliphant et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5187735 | Herrero Garcia et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5206903 | Kohler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208748 | Flores et al. | May 1993 | A |
5235519 | Miura | Aug 1993 | A |
5239462 | Jones et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262941 | Saladin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5289371 | Abel et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5319542 | King et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351186 | Bullock et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5372507 | Goleh | Dec 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387783 | Mihm et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5450537 | Hirai et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5517405 | McAndrew et al. | May 1996 | A |
5563805 | Arbuckle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
5581702 | McArdle et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583763 | Atcheson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590038 | Pitroda | Dec 1996 | A |
5592378 | Cameron et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611052 | Dykstra et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636346 | Saxe | Jun 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5668953 | Sloo | Sep 1997 | A |
5678002 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694163 | Harrison | Dec 1997 | A |
5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
5699526 | Siefert | Dec 1997 | A |
5704029 | Wright | Dec 1997 | A |
5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5724155 | Saito | Mar 1998 | A |
5724522 | Kagami et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727048 | Hiroshima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727163 | Bezos | Mar 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745654 | Titan | Apr 1998 | A |
5748755 | Johnson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758328 | Giovannoli | May 1998 | A |
5760771 | Blonder et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761640 | Kalyanswamy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761649 | Hill | Jun 1998 | A |
5764916 | Busey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765142 | Allred et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774869 | Toader | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5774882 | Keen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774883 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778164 | Watkins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784568 | Needham | Jul 1998 | A |
5793365 | Tang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | MacNaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797133 | Jones et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799151 | Hoffer | Aug 1998 | A |
5805159 | Bertram et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806043 | Toader | Sep 1998 | A |
5812769 | Graber et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815663 | Uomini | Sep 1998 | A |
5818907 | Mahoney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819029 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819235 | Tamai et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819236 | Josephson | Oct 1998 | A |
5819291 | Haimowitz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825869 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826241 | Stein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5828839 | Moncreiff | Oct 1998 | A |
5832465 | Tom | Nov 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838682 | Dekelbaum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838910 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839117 | Cameron et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850517 | Verkler et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852809 | Abel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857079 | Claus et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859974 | McArdle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862330 | Anupam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866889 | Weiss et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5878403 | DeFrancesco et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895454 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
5903641 | Tonisson | May 1999 | A |
5907677 | Glenn et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911135 | Atkins | Jun 1999 | A |
5916302 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918014 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930776 | Dykstra et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940811 | Norris | Aug 1999 | A |
5940812 | Tengel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943416 | Gisby et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943478 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945989 | Freishtat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950179 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956693 | Geerlings | Sep 1999 | A |
5958014 | Cave | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963625 | Kawecki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963635 | Szlam | Oct 1999 | A |
5966699 | Zandi | Oct 1999 | A |
5970475 | Barnes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson | Oct 1999 | A |
5974446 | Sonnenrich et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
5991740 | Messer | Nov 1999 | A |
5995947 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003013 | Boushy | Dec 1999 | A |
6009410 | LeMole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014644 | Erickson | Jan 2000 | A |
6014645 | Cunningham | Jan 2000 | A |
6014647 | Nizzari | Jan 2000 | A |
6016504 | Arnold et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026370 | Jermyn | Feb 2000 | A |
6028601 | Machiraju et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029149 | Dykstra et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029890 | Austin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044146 | Gisby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044360 | Picciallo | Mar 2000 | A |
6049784 | Weatherly et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052447 | Golden | Apr 2000 | A |
6052730 | Felciano | Apr 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058428 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061658 | Chou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064987 | Walker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070149 | Tavor et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073112 | Geerlings | Jun 2000 | A |
6076100 | Cottrille et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078892 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084585 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085126 | Mellgren, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085195 | Hoyt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088686 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
6112190 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6119103 | Basch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131095 | Low et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134318 | O'Neil | Oct 2000 | A |
6134530 | Bunting et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134532 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134533 | Shell | Oct 2000 | A |
6138139 | Beck et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144991 | England | Nov 2000 | A |
6163607 | Bogart et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167395 | Beck et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170011 | Macleod Beck et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173053 | Bogart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182050 | Ballard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182124 | Lau et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185543 | Galperin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189003 | Leal | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192319 | Simonson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192380 | Light et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199079 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202053 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202155 | Tushie et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208979 | Sinclair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222919 | Hollatz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236975 | Boe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240396 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249795 | Douglis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262730 | Horvitz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267292 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272506 | Bell | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282284 | Dezonno et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285983 | Jenkins | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289319 | Lockwood | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292786 | Deaton | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295061 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311169 | Duhon | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6311178 | Bi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324524 | Lent et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334110 | Walter | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338066 | Martin | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349290 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356909 | Spencer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374230 | Walker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377936 | Henrick et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381640 | Beck | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385594 | Lebda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393479 | Glommen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405181 | Lent et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6438526 | Dykes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449358 | Anisimov | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449646 | Sikora et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463149 | Jolissaint et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477533 | Schiff et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507851 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510418 | Case et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510427 | Bossemeyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516421 | Peters | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519628 | Locascio | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535492 | Shtivelman | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542936 | Mayle et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546372 | Lauffer | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549919 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567791 | Lent et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571236 | Ruppelt | May 2003 | B1 |
6597377 | MacPhai | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618746 | Desai et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622131 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622138 | Bellamkonda | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6662215 | Moskowitz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665395 | Busey et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671818 | Mikurak | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691159 | Grewal et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701441 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718313 | Lent et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725210 | Key | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741995 | Chen | May 2004 | B1 |
6760429 | Hung et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766302 | Bach | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6795812 | Lent et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804659 | Graham et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826594 | Pettersen | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829585 | Grewal et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836768 | Hirsh | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839680 | Liu | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850896 | Kelman et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865267 | Dezono | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892347 | Williams | May 2005 | B1 |
6904408 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920434 | Cossette | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922705 | Northrup | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925441 | Jones | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6925442 | Shapira et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6950983 | Snavely | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6965868 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981028 | Rawat et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993557 | Yen | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003476 | Samra et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039599 | Merriman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051273 | Holt et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7076443 | Emens et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085682 | Heller et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092959 | Chen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106850 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7143063 | Lent et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7181492 | Wen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200614 | Reid et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242760 | Shires | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243109 | Omega et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251648 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7287000 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313575 | Carr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7337127 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346576 | Lent et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346604 | Bharat et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346606 | Bharat | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370002 | Heckerman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376603 | Mayr et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7403973 | Wilsher et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7424363 | Cheng | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7523191 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526439 | Freishtat et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536320 | McQueen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552080 | Willard et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7590550 | Schoenberg | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7630986 | Herz et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657465 | Freishtat et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7689924 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7702635 | Horvitz et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716322 | Benedikt et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734503 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734632 | Wang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739149 | Freishtat et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7818340 | Warren | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7827128 | Karlsson et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7865457 | Ravin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877679 | Ozana | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7958066 | Pinckney et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966564 | Catlin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975020 | Green et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8010422 | Lascelles et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8185544 | Oztekin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8260846 | Lahav | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266127 | Mattox et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8392580 | Allen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010011245 | Duhon | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010011246 | Tammaro | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010011262 | Hoyt et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010011282 | Katsumata et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013009 | Greening | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014877 | Defrancesco et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025249 | Tokunaga | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027436 | Tenembaum | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032140 | Hoffman | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032244 | Neustel | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034689 | Heilman | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010054041 | Chang | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054064 | Kannan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056405 | Muyres | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002491 | Whitfield | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004735 | Gross | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010625 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016731 | Kupersmit | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023051 | Kunzle et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026351 | Coleman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029188 | Schmid | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029267 | Sankuratripati et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035486 | Huyn et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038230 | Chen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045154 | Wood | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046086 | Pletz | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046096 | Srinivasan | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047859 | Szlam et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055878 | Burton et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059095 | Cook | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067500 | Yokomizo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073162 | McErlean | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082923 | Merriman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083095 | Wu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083167 | Costigan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091832 | Low et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107728 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111850 | Smrcka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123926 | Bushold | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161620 | Hatanaka | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161664 | Shaya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167539 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014304 | Calvert et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023754 | Eichstadt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028415 | Herschap, III et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036949 | Kaddeche et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041056 | Bossemeyer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055778 | Erlanger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110130 | Pelletier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140037 | Deh-Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149937 | McElfresh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154196 | Goodwin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167195 | Fernandes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195848 | Felger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217332 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221163 | Glover et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040034567 | Gravett | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064412 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088323 | Elder et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128390 | Blakley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153368 | Freishtat et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163101 | Swix et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167928 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193377 | Brown | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210820 | Tarr et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243539 | Skurtovich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260574 | Gross | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004864 | Lent et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014117 | Stillman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033728 | James | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050114195 | Bernasconi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132205 | Palliyil et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138115 | Llamas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171861 | Bezos et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183003 | Peri | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198120 | Reshef et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198212 | Zilberfayn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216342 | Ashbaugh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256955 | Bodwell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262065 | Barth et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288943 | Wei et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015390 | Rijisinghani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021009 | Lunt | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026237 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041476 | Zheng | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047615 | Ravin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059124 | Krishna | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106788 | Forrest | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122850 | Ward et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168509 | Boss et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060253319 | Chayes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271545 | Youn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282327 | Neal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282328 | Gerace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284378 | Snow et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288087 | Sun | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293950 | Meek et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027771 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027785 | Lent et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053513 | Hoffberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061412 | Karidi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061421 | Karidi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073585 | Apple et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094228 | Nevin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100653 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100688 | Book | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116238 | Jacobi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116239 | Jacobi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162501 | Agassi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070239527 | Nazer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250585 | Ly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260596 | Koran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265873 | Sheth et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021816 | Lent et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033941 | Parrish | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040225 | Roker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072170 | Simons | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080147480 | Sarma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147741 | Gonen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080201436 | Gartner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215541 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244024 | Aaltonen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262897 | Howarter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270294 | Lent et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270295 | Lent et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319778 | Abhyanker | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006174 | Lauffer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006179 | Billingsley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006622 | Doerr | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030859 | Buchs et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055267 | Roker | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076887 | Spivack et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099904 | Affeld et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119173 | Parsons et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138606 | Moran et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164171 | Wold et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177771 | Britton et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210405 | Ortega et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222572 | Fujihara | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287534 | Guo et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287633 | Nevin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307003 | Benyamin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319296 | Schoenberg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023475 | Lahav | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023581 | Lahav | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049602 | Softky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106552 | Barillaud | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119379 | Becker et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100205024 | Shachar et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100281008 | Braunwarth | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110041168 | Murray et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055207 | Schorzman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055331 | Adelman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055338 | Loeb et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112893 | Karlsson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113101 | Ye et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119264 | Hu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138298 | Alfred et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161792 | Florence et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110246406 | Lahav et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270926 | Boyd | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110271175 | Lavi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110307331 | Richard et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320715 | Ickman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120042389 | Bradley et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059722 | Rao | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120136939 | Stern et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150973 | Barak | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120323346 | Ashby et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013362 | Walker et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036202 | Lahav | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130132194 | Rajaram | May 2013 | A1 |
20130182834 | Lauffer | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130268468 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275862 | Adra | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130336471 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
840244 | May 1998 | EP |
1233361 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1276 064 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1549025 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 840 803 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1845436 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1850284 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2 950 214 | Mar 2011 | FR |
9288453 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2004-054533 | Feb 2004 | JP |
20040110399 | Dec 2004 | KR |
20050010487 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20080046310 | May 2008 | KR |
20080097751 | Nov 2008 | KR |
9722073 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9845797 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9909470 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9922328 | May 1999 | WO |
9944152 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0057294 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0127825 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0135272 | May 2001 | WO |
02065367 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03032146 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004057473 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005059777 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2007044757 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007129625 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008057181 | May 2008 | WO |
2008143382 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009029940 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010099632 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010119379 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010144207 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011127049 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chartrand Sabra, “A new system seeks to ease the bottleneck in the customer-service information highway,” The New York Times (Apr. 30, 2001), 2 pages. |
Just Answer (2004 Faq) Archive.org cache of www.justanswer.com circa (Dec. 2004), 8 pages. |
Pack Thomas, “Human Search Engines the next Killer app,” (Dec. 1, 2000) Econtent DBS vol. 23; Issue 6, 7 pages. |
Match.Com “Match.com Launches Match.com Advisors,” PR Newswire (Oct. 14, 2003), 2 pages. |
SITEL, “SITEL to Provide Live Agent Support Online for Expertcity.com,” PR Newswire (Feb. 28, 2000), 2 pages. |
Webmaster World, “Link to my website is in a frame with banner ad at the top,” www.webmasterworld.com (Nov. 11, 2003), 2 pages. |
Bry et al., “Realilzing Business Processes with ECA Rules: Benefits, Challenges, Limits,” Principles and Practice of Sematic Web Reasoning Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 48-62, LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE (Jan. 2006). |
Fairisaac, “How SmartForms for Blaze Advisor Works,” www.fairisaac.com 12 pages (Jan. 2005). |
Mesbah A et al., “A Component-and Push-Based Architectural Style for Ajax Applications,” The Journal of Systems & Software, 81 (12): pp. 2194-2209, Elsevier North Holland, New York, NY US (Dec. 2008). |
ORACLE Fusion Middleware Administrator's Guide for Oracle SOA (Oracle Guide) Suite 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) Part No. E10226-02 www.docs.oracle.com (Oct. 2009), 548 pages. |
“OAuth core 1.0 Revision A [XP002570263],” OAuth Core Workgroups, pp. 1-27 www.ouath.net/core/1.0a/ (retrieved Jan. 31, 2013), 24 pages. |
Anon., “AnswerSoft Announces Concerto; First to Combine Call Center Automation with Power of Web,” Business Wire, (Feb. 3, 1997) 3 pages. |
Emigh, J., “AnswerSoft Unveils Concerto for Web-Based Call Centers Feb. 5, 1996,” Newsbytes, (Feb. 5, 1997) 2 pages. |
Grigonis, R., “Webphony—It's not Just Callback Buttons Anymore,” Computer Telephony, (Dec. 1997) 4 pages. |
Wagner, M., “Caring for Customers,” Internet World, (Sep. 1, 1999) 3 pages. |
Sweat, J., “Human Touch—A New Wave of E-Service Offerings Blends the Web, E-Mail, and Voice Bringing People back into the Picture,” Information week, (Oct. 4, 1999) 2 pages. |
Kirkpatrick, K., “Electronic Exchange 2000, The,” Computer Shopper, (Nov. 1999) 5 pages. |
Anon., “InstantService.com Teams with Island Data to provide Integrated Solution for Online Customer Response,” Business Wire, (May 22, 2000) 3 pages. |
Kersnar, S., “Countrywide Offers Proprietary Technology for Online Wholesale Lending,” National Mortgage News, vol. 24, No. 38, (Jun. 5, 2000) 2 pages. |
Douglas Armstrong, Firstar Web site helps add up future, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, (Mar. 28, 1996) 3 pages. |
redhat .com downloaded on Jul. 23, 2006. |
apache.org downloaded on Jul. 23, 2006. |
mysql.com downloaded on Jul. 23, 2006. |
developer.com downloaded on Jul. 23, 2006. |
Canter, Ronald S., “Lender Beware-Federal Regulation of Consumer Credit”, Credit World, vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 16-20, (May 1993). |
Staff, “On-Line System Approves Loans While Customer Waits,” Communication News, vol. 31, Issue 9, (Sep. 1994) 3 pages. |
“Low-Rent Loan Officer in a Kiosk”, Bank Technology News vol. 8 No. 2, p (Feb. 1995) 2 pages. |
Duclaux, Denise, “A Check for $5,000 in Ten Minutes”, ABA Banking Journal, vol. 87, No. 8, p. 45, AUQ. (1995) 2 pages. |
“World Wide Web Enhances Customers Choice”, Cards International, No. 143, p. 9, (Nov. 1995) 2 pages. |
Wells Fargo Launches First Real-Time, Online Home Equity Credit Decision-Making Service, Business Wire, (Jun. 3, 1998), Dialog—File 621: New Product Announcement, 3 pages. |
Handley, John, “Credit Review Lets the Numbers Do the Talking in Home Mortgage Game”, Chicago Tribune (Jul. 1998) 3 pages. |
Sherman, Lee, “Wells Fargo Writes a New Online Script”, Interactive Week, vol. 5, No. 31, p. 29, (Aug. 1998) 2 pages. |
Calvey, Mark, “Internet Gives Bankers a Snappy Comeback”, San Francisco Business Times, vol. 13, No. 5, p. 3 (Sep. 1998) 2 pages. |
McCormick, Linda, “Users of Credit Scoring Face Tough Rules on Notification”, American Banker, Dialog File 625: American Banker Publications, (Mar. 21, 1982) 2 pages. |
What the Credit Bureau is Saying About You: If a Mistake Sneaks Into Your Record, You May Not Know About it Until You Get Turned Down for Credit, Changing Times, vol. 37, p. 56, (Jul. 1983) 2 pages. |
McShane. Peter K., “Got Financing?”, Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Finger Lakes. North, vol. 11, Issue 19, p. 9, (Sep. 15, 1997) 3 pages. |
Borowsky, Mark, “The Neural Net: Predictor of Fraud or Victim of Hype?”, Bank Technology News DialoQ File 16:PROMT, p. 7 (Sep. 1993) 2 pages. |
FICO http://houseloans.idis.com/fico (2009) 1 page. |
Altavista: search, FICO http://www.altavista.com (2001) 3 pages. |
What Do FICO Scores Mean to Me?, http://www.sancap.com. (1999) 3 pages. |
What is a FICO Score?, http://www.aspeenloan.com (2009) 1 page. |
“Credit”, The New Encyclopedia Britannica vol. 3 p. 722. (1994) 3 pages. |
“Creditnet.com—An Online Guide to Credit Cards”, http://www.creditnet/com. (1999) 1 page. |
“Phillips 66 Introduces Mastercard with Rebate Feature”, PR Newswire, p914NY067, (Sep. 14, 1995) 1 page. |
Anon, “VAR Agreement Expands Credit Bureau Access.”, (CCS America, Magnum Communications Ltd expand CardPac access, Computers in Banking, v6, n10, (1) (Oct. 1989) 2 pages. |
Wortmann, Harry S., “Reengineering Update—Outsourcing: An Option Full of Benefits and Responsibilities”, American Banker, (Oct. 24, 1994), p. 7A vol. 159, No. 205 3 pages. |
Anon. “To Boost Balances, AT&T Renews No-Fee Universal Credit Card Offer”, Gale Group Newsletter, V 10, N. 13, (Mar. 30, 1992) 2 pages. |
Anon. “Citgo Puts a New Spin on the Cobranded Oil Card”, Credit Card News, p. 4, (Nov. 1, 1995) 2 pages. |
Anon. “Microsoft Targets More than PIM Market with Outlook 2000,” Computer Reseller News, N. 805 pp. 99, (Aug. 31, 1998) 2 pages. |
Chesanow, Neil, “Pick the Right Credit Cards—and use them wisely”, Medical Economics, v. 75, n. 16, p. 94, (Aug. 24, 1998) 4 pages. |
Friedland, Marc, “Credit Scoring Digs Deeper into Data”, Credit World, v. 84, n. 5 p. 19-23, (May 1996) 5 pages. |
Hollander, Geoffrey, “Sibling Tool Personator 3 untangles File Formats”, InfoWorld, v20, n5, pp. 102 (Feb. 2, 1998) 2 pages. |
Kantrow, Yvette D., “Banks Press Cardholders to Take Cash Advances”, American Banker, v. 157, n. 18 pp. 1-2. (Jan. 28, 1992) 2 pages. |
Lotus News Release: “Lotus Delivers Pre-Release of Lotus Notes 4.6 Client Provides Compelling New Integration with Internet Explorer”, (May 20, 1997) 2 pages. |
Stetenfeld, Beth, “Credit Scoring: Finding the Right Recipe”, Credit Union Management, v. 17, n. 11, pp. 24-26 (Nov. 1994). |
Block, Valerie, “Network Assembles Card Issuers at an Internet Site”, Am. Banker, V160, (1998) 1 page. |
CreditNet Financial Network http://consumers.creditnet.com (1999) 1 page. |
Anon., “Lending Tree: Lending Tree Provides Borrowers Fast and Easy Online Access to Multiple Loan Offers,” Business Wire, Jun. 23, 1998, 2 pages. |
Anon, Regulation Z Commentary Amendments, Retail Banking Digest, vol. 15, No. 2, p. 17-18, (Mar.-Apr. 1995). |
Anon, San Diego Savings Association Offers Customers No-Fee Visa Product, Card News, (Feb. 29, 1988) 1 page. |
Bloom, J.K., “For This New Visa, Only Web Surfers Need Apply,” American Banker, vol. 1163, No. 34 12 (Feb. 20, 1998) 2 pages. |
Harney, K.R., “Realty Brokers, Lenders Face Restrictions,” Arizona Republic, Final Chaser edition, Sun Living section, (Feb. 10, 1991) 2 pages. |
Higgins, K.T., “Mr. Plastic Joins the Marketing Team,” Credit Card Management, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 26-30, Jun. 1993. |
Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, Third Edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, 1997, 4 pages. |
Whiteside, D.E., “One Million and Counting,” Collections and Credit Risk, vol. 1, No. 11 (Nov. 1996) 5 pages. |
Fickenscher, L., “Providian Undercuts rivals with 7.9% Rate Offer,” American banker, vol. 163, Oct. 8, 1998, 2 pages. |
Fargo, J., “The Internet Specialists,” Credit Card Management, vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 38-45, Jan. 1999. |
Lemay, T., “Browsing for a Mortgage a Click away,” Financial Post, (Jan. 15, 2000) 1 page. |
Wijnen, R., “Banks Fortify Online Services,” Bank Technology News, vol. 13, No. 3, Mar. 2000, 3 pages. |
Anon. “IAFC Launches NextCard, the First True Internet Visa,” Business Wire, New York: (Feb. 6, 1998), 3 pages. |
Lazarony, Lucy, “Only Online Applicants Need Apply,” Bank Advertising News, North Palm Beach, Mar. 23, 1998, vol. 21, Issue 15, 3 pages. |
FIData, Inc., News & Press Releases, “Instant Credit Union Loans via the Internet,” http://web.archive.org/web/19990221115203/www.fidata-inc.com/news-pr01.htm (1999) 2 pages. |
FIData, Inc., Press Releases, “Instant Loan Approvals via the Internet,” http://www.fidata- inc.com/news/pr—040198.htm, (Apr. 1, 1998) 2 pages. |
Staff, “On-Line System Approves Loans While Customer Waits”—Abstract, Communication News, vol. 31, Issue 9, (Sep. 1994) 3 pages. |
Anon. “Affordable Lending Systems Now Available for Smaller Financial Institutions,” Business Wire, (May 18, 1998), 2 pages. |
Nexis—All News Sources—Examiner's NPL Search Results in U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,498, included with Office Action issued Oct. 8, 2008, 14 pages. |
“Sample Experian Credit Report” by Consumer Information consumerinfo.com (Jul. 9, 1998) 4 pages. |
Plaintiffs Original Complaint, Nextcard, LLC v. Liveperson, Inc.; Civil Action No. 2:08-cv- 00184-TJW, In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed Apr. 30 2008 (7 pages). |
Amended Complaint and Jury Demand; Liveperson, Inc. v. Nextcard, LLC, et al.; Civil Action No. 08-062 (GMS), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, filed Mar. 18, 2008 (5 pages). |
Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed Apr. 9, 2008 (12 pages). |
Defendants HSBC North America Holdings Inc.'s and HSBC USA Inc's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division filed (Apr. 28, 2008), 13 pages. |
Answer and Counterclaims of Defendant DFS Services LLC; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed Apr. 28, 2008 (13 pages). |
Defendant The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.'s Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Second Amended Complaint; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed Apr. 28 2008, 10 pages. |
Plaintiffs Second Amended Reply to Counterclaims of Defendants HSBC North America Holdings Inc. and HSBC USA Inc.; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed May 14, 2008, 5 pages. |
Plaintiffs Second Amended Reply to Counterclaims of Defendant DFS Services LLC; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed May 14, 2008 (71 pages). |
Plaintiffs Second Amended Reply to Counterclaims of Defendant American Express Company; Nextcard, LLC v. American Express Company, et al; Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-354 (TJW); In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filed (May 8, 2008), 8 pages. |
Justin Hibbard, Gregory Dalton, Mary E Thyfault. (Jun. 1998). “Web-based customer care.” Information Week, (684) 18-20, 3 pages. |
Kim S. Nash “Call all Customers.” Computerworld, 32 (1), 25-28 (Dec. 1997), 2 pages. |
PRN: “First American Financial Acquires Tele-Track Inc.,”PR Newswire, (May 11, 1999), Proquest #41275773, 2 pages. |
Young, Deborah, “The Information Store,” (Sep. 15, 2000), Wireless Review, pp. 42, 44, 46, 48, 50. |
Whiting et al., “Profitable Customers,” (Mar. 29, 1999), Information Week, Issue 727, pp. 44, 45, 48, 52, 56. |
Bayer, Judy, “A Framework for Developing and Using Retail Promotion Response Models,” Cares Integrated Solutions, retrieved from www.ceresion.com (2007) 5 pages. |
Bayer, Judy, “Automated Response Modeling System for Targeted Marketing,” (Mar. 1998), Ceres Integrated Solutions, 5 pages. |
Sweet et al., “Instant Marketing,” (Aug. 12, 1999), Information Week, pp. 18-20. |
SmartKids.com “Chooses Quadstone—The Smartest Customer Data Mining Solution,” (Jul. 31, 2000), Business Wire, 2 pages. |
“NCR's Next Generation Software Makes True Customer Relationship Management a Reality,” (Jul. 26, 1999) PR Newswire, 3 pages. |
“Quadstone System 3.0 Meets New Market Demand for Fast, Easy-to-Use Predictive Analysis for CRM,” (May 22, 2000) Business Wire, 3 pages. |
“Net Perceptions Alters Dynamics of Marketing Industry with Introduction of Net Perceptions for Call Centers,” (Oct. 12, 1998) PR Newswire, 3 pages. |
“Ceres Targeted Marketing Application,” Ceres Integrated Solutions: retrieved from www.ceresios.com/Product/index.htm (2007) 3 pages. |
Prince, C. J., E:business: A Look at the Future, Chief Executive, vol. 154, (Apr. 2000), pp. 10-11. |
Oikarinen et al. “Internet Relay Chat Protocol” RFC-1459, pp. 1-65, (May 1993). |
eDiet.com: Personalized Diets, Fitness, and Counseling, (May 3, 1998), pp. 1-15. |
Fiszer, Max; “Customizing an inbound call-center with skills-based routing,” Telemarketing & Call Center Solutions, (Jan. 1997), v15i7 p. 24; Proquest #11267840, 5 pages. |
“ESL Federal Credit Union Inaugurates Internet Target Marketing.” PR Newswire p. 4210 (Oct. 6, 1998), 3 pages. |
“Welcome to eStara—The Industry Leader in Click to Call and Call Tracking Solutions,” e-Stara, Inc., retrieved from www.estara.com on Mar. 21, 2013, 1 page. |
“Push to Talk Live Now! From your website” iTalkSystem, Inc., retrieved from www.italksystems.com on Mar. 21, 2013, 1 page. |
Richardson et al., “Predicting Clicks: Estimating the Click-Through Rate for New Ads,” (May 2007) 9 pages. |
“Welcome to Keen” retrieved from www.archive.org/web/20010302014355/http://www.keen.com/ on Jan. 25, 2013, 1 page. |
Christophe Destruel, Herve Luga, Yves Duthen, Rene Caubet. “Classifiers based system for interface evolution.” Expersys Conference, 265-270 (1997), 6 pages. |
Ulla de Stricker, Annie Joan Olesen. “Is Management Consulting for You?” Searcher, 48-53 (Mar. 2005), 6 pages. |
Humberto T. Marques Neto, Leonardo C.D. Rocha, Pedro H.C. Guerra, Jussara M. Almeida, Wagner Meira Jr., Virgilio A. F. Almeida. “A Characterization of Broadband User Behavior and Their E-Business Activities.” ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 3-13 (2004), 11 pages. |
Greg Bowman, Michael M. Danchak, Mary LaCombe, Don Porter. “Implementing the Rensselaer 80/20 Model in Professional Education.” 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session T3G (Oct. 18-21, 2000), 1 page. |
Elizabeth Sklar Rozier, Richard Alterman. “Participatory Adaptation.” CHI, 97, 261-262 (Mar. 22-27, 1997), 2 pages. |
Frank White. “The User Interface of Expert Systems: What Recent Research Tells Us.” Library Software Review, vol. 13, No. 2, p. 91-98 (Summer 1994) 8 pages. |
Frederick W. Rook, Michael L. Donnell. “Human Cognition and the Expert System Interface: Mental Models and Inference Explanations.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 23, No. 6, p. 1649-1661 (Nov./Dec. 1993), 13 pages. |
Richardson et al., “Predicting Clicks: Estimating the Click-Through Rate for New Ads,” (May 2007). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/041147, mailed Jul. 30, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/037086, mailed Jul. 12, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/29389, mailed Jul. 24, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038212, mailed Jul. 17, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US03/41090, mailed on Sep. 1, 2004, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/40012, mailed on Oct. 5, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/039630, dated Apr. 16, 2008, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/031239, mailed on Jul. 7, 2011, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/064946, mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/031239, dated Oct. 9, 2012, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jul. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jan. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jul. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Feb. 1, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action of Aug. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of May 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jan. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/394,078, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jun. 22, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,324, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Aug. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,782, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jul. 29, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,117, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action of Apr. 4, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,117, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Apr. 24, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action of Oct. 14, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of May 17, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Mar. 14, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jul. 26, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Aug. 13, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action of Apr. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jul. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action of Feb. 18, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Apr. 25, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action of Nov. 25, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Aug. 7, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,613, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of May 15, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,613, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Apr. 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,265, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action of Aug. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,265, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action of Feb. 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,324, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action of Apr. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,782, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jun. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,117, 56 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of May 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,708, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jun. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,265, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Mar. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,530, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jun. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,936, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Oct. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/961072, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Dec. 5, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,782, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action of Oct. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,265 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of Jan. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,530, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jan. 22, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,117, 45 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jan. 27, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/563,708, 35 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jan. 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,158, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of Feb. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,936, 33 pages. |
Final Office Action of Feb. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,072, 35 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Feb. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,613, 43 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of Feb. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,753, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of Mar. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,265, 31 pages. |
Notice of Allowance of Mar. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,999, 41 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130238714 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |