This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/612,857, filed Sep. 24, 2004, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/662,990, filed Mar. 18, 2005, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/663,289, filed Mar. 18, 2005, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/692,781, filed Jun. 22, 2005, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates generally to occlusion devices for the closure of physical anomalies, such as an atrial septal defect, a patent foramen ovale, and other septal and vascular defects. The invention also relates to delivery systems and mechanisms for such devices.
A patent foramen ovale (PFO), illustrated in
The foramen ovale serves a desired purpose when a fetus is gestating. Because blood is oxygenated through the umbilical cord, and not through the developing lungs, the circulatory system of the fetal heart allows the blood to flow through the foramen ovale as a physiologic conduit for right-to-left shunting. After birth, with the establishment of pulmonary circulation, the increased left atrial blood flow and pressure results in functional closure of the foramen ovale. This functional closure is subsequently followed by anatomical closure of the two over-lapping layers of tissue: septum primum 14 and septum secundum 16. However, a PFO has been shown to persist in a number of adults.
The presence of a PFO is generally considered to have no therapeutic consequence in otherwise healthy adults. Paradoxical embolism via a PFO is considered in the diagnosis for patients who have suffered a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the presence of a PFO and without another identified cause of ischemic stroke. While there is currently no definitive proof of a cause-effect relationship, many studies have confirmed a strong association between the presence of a PFO and the risk for paradoxical embolism or stroke. In addition, there is significant evidence that patients with a PFO who have had a cerebral vascular event are at increased risk for future, recurrent cerebrovascular events.
Accordingly, patients at such an increased risk are considered for prophylactic medical therapy to reduce the risk of a recurrent embolic event. These patients are commonly treated with oral anticoagulants, which potentially have adverse side effects, such as hemorrhaging, hematoma, and interactions with a variety of other drugs. The use of these drugs can alter a person's recovery and necessitate adjustments in a person's daily living pattern.
In certain cases, such as when anticoagulation is contraindicated, surgery may be necessary or desirable to close a PFO. The surgery would typically include suturing a PFO closed by attaching septum secundum to septum primum. This sutured attachment can be accomplished using either an interrupted or a continuous stitch and is a common way a surgeon shuts a PFO under direct visualization.
Umbrella devices and a variety of other similar mechanical closure devices, developed initially for percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs), have been used in some instances to close PFOs. These devices potentially allow patients to avoid the side effects often associated with anticoagulation therapies and the risks of invasive surgery. However, umbrella devices and the like that are designed for ASDs are not optimally suited for use as PFO closure devices.
Currently available septal closure devices present drawbacks, including technically complex implantation procedures. Additionally, there are significant complications due to thrombus, fractures of the components, conduction system disturbances, perforations of heart tissue, and residual leaks. Many devices have high septal profile and include large masses of foreign material, which may lead to unfavorable body adaptation of a device. Given that ASD devices are designed to occlude holes, many lack anatomic conformability to the flap-like anatomy of PFOs. Thus, when inserting an ASD device to close a PFO, the narrow opening and the thin flap may form impediments to proper deployment. Even if an occlusive seal is formed, the device may be deployed in the heart on an angle, leaving some components insecurely seated against the septum and, thereby, risking thrombus formation due to hemodynamic disturbances. Finally, some septal closure devices are complex to manufacture, which may result in inconsistent product performance.
Various delivery systems have been used to deliver occluders and other medical devices through body lumens. Some delivery systems of the prior art are used to deliver devices that readily expand to a delivered configuration when removed from the delivery system. Such delivery systems are not generally suited for delivering a device that does not readily expand into the delivered configuration. Further, the delivery systems of the prior art may not allow verification of the position of the device prior to full deployment of the device. Finally delivery systems of the prior art may not be suitable to manipulate the configuration of the device in a secure manner to allow for complete deployment of the device.
The devices and techniques disclosed herein are designed to address these and other deficiencies of prior art septal closure devices and techniques for delivering and retrieving such devices.
These and other aspects and embodiments of the disclosure are illustrated and described below.
This description discloses several delivery devices and techniques for delivering an implant into a desired location within the body. This delivery technique relates particularly to, but is not limited to, a septal occluder made from a polymer tube. These delivery techniques, in addition to use with septal occluders, could be applied to other medical devices, such as other expandable devices constructed from an underlying tubular structure.
In one aspect, a delivery system is disclosed for delivering an occluder that closes an aperture in septal tissue. The occluder includes a first side adapted to be disposed on one side of the septal tissue and a second side adapted to be disposed on the opposite side of the septal tissue. The first and second sides are adapted to occlude the aperture upon deployment of the device at its intended delivery location. The device also includes a catch system that maintains the configuration of the device once it has been deployed.
According to at least some embodiments, the device is formed from a tube. According to some embodiments, the tube includes a material selected from the group consisting of metals, shape memory materials, alloys, polymers, bioabsorbable polymers, and combinations thereof. In particular embodiments, the tube includes a shape memory polymer. In particular embodiments, the tube includes nitinol. In some embodiments, the tube is formed by rolling a flat piece of material into a tubular form. According to some embodiments, the device is formed by cutting the tube. The device is placed in its deployment configuration by reducing the axial length of the device.
According to some embodiments, the catch system reduces and maintains the axial length of the device. Also, varied constructions could be used to maintain the axial dimension of the device. In one form, catch elements such as, for example, balls, attached to a delivery wire could be used to maintain the axial dimension of the device. In a different construction, a locking mechanism could be used. Preferably, if a locking mechanism is used, it secures both sides of the device in the locked position with a single locking element. In some embodiments, a catch element secures the ends of the occluder in a compressed position. Preferably, if a catch mechanism is used, it secures both sides of the device in the deployed position with a single element.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a device for occluding an aperture in septal tissue, including a first side adapted to be disposed on one side of the septal tissue and a second side adapted to be disposed on the opposite side of the septal tissue. The first and second sides are adapted to occlude the defect when the device is deployed at its intended delivery location. Each of the first and second sides includes loops. The device further includes a catch system that maintains the configuration of the device once it has been deployed. The loops of the first and second sides and the catch system cooperate to provide a compressive force to the septal tissue surrounding the aperture.
According to some embodiments, each of the first and second sides includes at least two loops. In particular embodiments, each of the first and second sides includes four or six loops. Of course, the most desirable number of loops on each side will depend on a variety of anatomical and manufacturing factors. According to some embodiments, the device also includes a central tube that connects the first and second sides.
The delivery system may be used to deliver an occluder in which at least one of the first and second sides further includes a tissue scaffold. The tissue scaffold includes a material selected from the group consisting of polyester fabrics, Teflon-based materials, polyurethanes, metals, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), extracellular matrix (ECM) or other bioengineered materials, synthetic bioabsorbable polymeric scaffolds, collagen, and combinations thereof. In particular embodiments, the tissue scaffold includes nitinol.
The delivery system includes a first and a second securement system. The first securement system may be any one of a number of configurations. First, a delivery wire may be used to secure the distal end of the occluder onto the delivery system. When a delivery wire is used, the distal end of the delivery wire may be threaded and cooperate with a corresponding threaded portion on the occluder. In a preferred form, the threaded portion may have male threads on the occluder and female threads on the delivery wire. Alternatively, a ball and clasp, other interlocking system may be used.
The second securement system may be any one of a number of configurations. In one aspect it may be a threaded connection between the delivery system and the occluder. In another aspect, the second securement system is a collet system that includes fingers, which are configured to fit within a groove in the occluder and thus secure the occluder to the delivery system when the fingers are disposed in the groove. A collet sheath is moveable with respect to the fingers and when the collet fingers are disposed within the collet sheath, the fingers are configured to fit within the groove provided on the occluder.
In one aspect, a delivery system for the device is provided within (and includes) a delivery sheath. In certain embodiments, the delivery system includes a first securement system for securing a first end of the occluder and a second securement system for securing a second end of the occluder. The securement systems connect the occluder to first and second catheters contained in the delivery system and enable deployment and/or retrieval of the occluder. The catheters are preferably able to move relative to each other. The securement systems enable pushing and pulling of respective ends of the occluder by manipulating the catheters to expand and contract the device. The first securement system may employ a threaded connection and the second securement system may employ a suture connection. The securement systems are detached when the device has been properly positioned.
In a further aspect of the invention, the first securement system secures a distal end of a catching system of the device and the second securement system secures a proximal end of the device. A first catheter connects to the first securement system and a second catheter connects to the second securement system. In certain embodiments, the second catheter encloses the first catheter in its central lumen. In one aspect, the device is deployed by inserting the delivery system, removing the sheath, expanding the petals of a distal portion of the device, and expanding the petals of a proximal portion of the device. The delivery system can be detached by detaching the first and second securement systems, e.g., by unscrewing the first securement system and by cutting and removing the sutures. In another aspect, the deployed device is retrieved by contracting the petals of a proximal portion of the device using the second catheter, advancing the sheath over a proximal portion of the device, contracting the petals of a distal portion of the device using the first catheter and advancing the sheath over the distal portion of the device. The occluder can then be repositioned or removed.
In another aspect, a delivery system is disclosed for delivering an occluder that closes an aperture in septal tissue. The occluder includes a first side adapted to be disposed on one side of the septal tissue and a second side adapted to be disposed on the opposite side of the septal tissue. The first and second sides are adapted to occlude the aperture upon deployment of the device at its intended delivery location. The device also employs a catch system that maintains the configuration of the device once it has been deployed. The occluder may be held in its deployment configuration by the catch element.
In one aspect, a delivery system for the device is provided within a delivery sheath. In certain embodiments, the delivery system includes a first securement system for securing a first end of the occluder and a second securement system for securing a second end of the occluder. The securement systems connect the occluder to first and second extrusions, e.g., a catheter or a wire, contained in the delivery system and enable deployment and/or recovery of the occluder. The extrusions are preferably able to move relative to each other. The securement systems enable pushing and pulling of respective ends of the occluder by manipulating the extrusions to expand and contract the device by varying its axial length. The first securement system may employ a threaded connection. The second securement system may also employ a threaded connection. The securement systems are detached when the device has been properly positioned. The securement systems can be manipulated by control systems provided in the control portion of the delivery system.
In one preferred embodiment, the invention provides a axially collapsible occluder, a means for collapsing and expanding the occluder by changing the distance between the distal and proximal ends of the occluder, and a means for keeping the axial distance between the proximal and distal ends of the occluder fixed after its deployment.
These and other aspects and embodiments of the disclosure are illustrated and described below.
In the Drawings:
The present disclosure provides devices, delivery/retrieval systems and techniques for delivering such devices intended to occlude an aperture within body tissue. In particular and as described in detail below, the described occluder may be used for closing an ASD or PFO in the atrial septum of a heart. Although the embodiments are described with reference to an ASD or PFO, one skilled in the art will recognize that the device and methods of the present invention may be used to treat other anatomical conditions. As such, the invention should not be considered limited in applicability to any particular anatomical condition. In addition, the systems and methods for delivery and retrieval, and for catching a device in a deployed state, which are aspects of the present invention may also be used in connection with other types of devices besides an occluder, in particular, devices having tubular profiles.
In this application, “distal” refers to the direction away from a catheter insertion location and “proximal” refers to the direction nearer the insertion location. Additionally, the term “delivery configuration” refers to the configuration of a device, such as an occluder, when it has a reduced profile in a delivery catheter. The term “deployed configuration” refers to the configuration of the device, such as an occluder, when it has deployed from the catheter, such as at the desired implantation location.
The tube(s) 25 forming occluder 70 may be formed from a biocompatible metal or polymer. In at least some embodiments, the occluder 70 is formed of a bioabsorbable polymer, or a shape memory polymer. Shape memory polymers can be advantageous so that the structure of the device assists in pressing the PFO tunnel closed. In other embodiments, the occluder 70 is formed of a biocompatible metal, such as a shape memory alloy (e.g., nitinol). The thermal shape memory and/or superelastic properties of shape memory polymers and alloys permit the occluder 70 to resume and maintain its intended shape in vivo despite being distorted during the delivery process. Alternatively, or additionally, the occluder 70 may be formed of a bioabsorbable metal, such as iron, magnesium, or combinations of these and similar materials. Exemplary bioabsorbable polymers include polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions, for example poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) compositions, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,764, entitled Polyhydroxyalkanoate Compositions Having Controlled Degradation Rate and U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,569, entitled Medical Devices and Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Polymers, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The cross-sectional shape of tube 25 may be circular or polygonal, for example square, or hexagonal. The slits 31 and 41 may be disposed on the face of the polygon (i.e., the flat part) or on the intersection of the faces.
The tube can be injection molded, extruded, or constructed of a sheet of material and rolled into a tube. The sheet of material could be a single ply sheet or multiple ply. The slits that form the struts could be cut or stamped into the sheet prior to rolling the sheet into a tube to connect the ends to form an enclosed cross section. Various geometrical cross sections are possible including circular, square, hexagonal and octagonal and the joint could be at the vertex or along the flat of a wall if the cross section is of a particular geometery. Various attachment techniques could be used to join the ends of the sheet to form a tube, including welding, heat adhesives, non-heat adhesives and other joining techniques suitable for in-vivo application.
The petal configuration is the deployed configuration. The occluder 70 can be secured in the petal configuration by a catch system that holds the ends of the tube 25 together, certain embodiments of which are described below. Use of the terms distal and proximal sides or portions 30 and 40, respectively, include the petals that are formed on the distal and proximal sides.
The embodiment described in conjunction with
The transformable design of occluder 70 enables occluder 70 to be delivered in a low profile, tubular form and to be converted readily, i.e., by reducing the axial length, in place to the high-profile deployed configuration. Moreover, the conversion can readily be effected by forcing distal end 39 and proximal end 44 together. For example, distal side 30 and proximal side 40 of occluder 70 may be deployed in separate steps, or both distal side 30 and proximal side 40 of occluder 70 may be exposed (e.g., out of the delivery catheter) prior to engaging the catch system and deployed together as the catch element is engaged. Use of the terms distal and proximal side 30 and 40, respectively, include the loops or other geometries and configurations that are formed on the distal and proximal sides, respectively.
Occluder 70 may be prepared for delivery to an aperture 18 in any one of several ways. Slits 31 and 41 may be cut such that tube 25 bends into its intended configuration following deployment in vivo. Specifically, slits 31 and 41 may be cut to produce struts 32 and 42 of a thickness that facilitates the bending and formation of loops 32 and 42 upon the application of forces Fd and/or Fp during deployment. See
In general, references to “occluder 70” herein may be inclusive of catch element 50, depending on the context, for example, unless separately listed or otherwise stated. One end of tube 25 is able to move with respect to the catch element 50 (and especially the catch system) so that the distal and proximal petals 32 and 42 can move from the delivery configuration to the deployed configuration. The inside surface of the tube 25 is able to slide over the catch element 50 so that, when the proximal end 44 of the occluder 70 rests against the surface of the proximal flange 56, the occluder 70 is secured in its deployed configuration. The catch element 50 is included in the catch system that includes a portion for connection to the delivery/recovery system, including, for example, a threaded section illustrated in
As illustrated in
The delivery system, including the delivery sheath 144, may next be inserted through aperture 18 located in the septal tissue 12 (which, in this example, is a PFO tunnel) and into the left atrium 13. Distal side 30 of occluder 70 is then exposed into the left atrium 13 by withdrawing the delivery sheath 144 then pulling force F1 is applied to delivery string or wire 150 such that, for example, a catch element 50 passes through the central tube 22, thereby securing distal side 30 into its deployed state. Delivery sheath 144 is withdrawn further through the aperture 18 and into the right atrium 11, such that central tube 22 is positioned through the aperture 18. As shown in
As shown in
As mentioned above, during the deployment of the occluder 70 in the delivery system 140 described in connection with
Both securement systems are able to move relative to one another during the delivery process and as a result, both securement systems cause the occluder 70 to move into the deployed configuration. In the process of delivering the occluder 70, the second securement system is typically released and the first securement system is held while the position of the occluder 70 is evaluated by, for example, fluoroscopy, and if the position of the occluder 70 is appropriate, the first securement system is released.
For convenience in describing the function of the controls, the catheter portion 250 is discussed first. Now, referring to
Still referring to
Since the occluder 224 is delivered percutaneously, the delivery system 220 must be able to be secured so that the occluder 224 can be placed accurately at the desired delivery location and transformed into its deployed configuration. Securement systems are provided that attach the delivery components to the occluder 224. The securement systems are typically released serially after proper placement of the occluder 224 is confirmed. The securement systems are configured to provide accurate delivery of the occluder 224 to the desired delivery location and allow for a controlled deployment. Also, a device deployed according to this mechanism is able to be retrieved and repositioned until the final stage of the deployment process. It is also possible to retrieve the device once it has been fully released.
Referring to
Still referring to
Deployment of the occluder to a desired site is typically a multi-step operation. In
Referring now to
Referring now to
The occluder 224 can be evaluated for proper deployment with the delivery system 220 attached or at least partially detached. The delivery system 220 can be partially detached by releasing one of the securement systems provided by the delivery catheter 244 and the delivery wire 246. As shown in
Once the occluder 224 is successfully deployed, the delivery system 220 can be detached in the sequence shown in
Referring now to
The components of an alternate preferred embodiment of the invention are described in connection with
As shown in
As illustrated in
In a presently preferred embodiment, the male threads are disposed on the occluder 310 and the female threads are disposed on the delivery wire 380. This configuration has several advantages. First, the occluder 310 does not need a female connector and there is no cavity in which blood can stagnate and promote clotting. Second, the space required for the threaded connector 392 on the occluder 310 is diminished. Finally, a female connector on the delivery wire 380 may allow for a more smooth deployment of the occluder 310.
The first securement system interconnects the delivery wire 380 to the threaded portion on the occluder 310. Representative embodiments of the first securement system and its components are illustrated in more detail in
Referring again to
In another embodiment of the first securement system, illustrated in
Any of the previous embodiments described in
The process of retrieving an occluder varies based on the state of the delivery when the decision to retrieve the occluder is made. If the second and first securement systems are still attached and the catch system has not secured the device in the deployed configuration, then the retrieval process is simply a reversal of the deployment process. The second securement system is pulled and the device can be withdrawn into delivery sheath 356 and removed from the body.
If the catch system has secured the device in a deployed configuration, and the second and first securement systems are still attached, the process is the same with the addition of moving the catch element of the occluder relative to the second securement so that the device can be elongated. Once that occurs, the device can be withdrawn as described above.
The retrieval process for an occluder in which the second securement system is a collet system, which has been disengaged, requires an additional step. The collet system is advanced until the collet fingers are in alignment with the groove on the occluder. Next the collet sheath is advanced over the collet fingers such that the fingertips fit within the groove on the occluder. By pulling on the collet tube with the occluder firmly secured, the device can be returned to its collapsed state and retrieved into the delivery assembly. From this point the delivery process can be restarted.
Another embodiment of the second and first securement system of the delivery system, illustrated in
The deployment of the occluder is effected by withdrawing the delivery sheath 356 to expose and let the distal petals 30 on the distal side of the occluder expand as illustrated in
An alternative recovery sequence is also provided. The recovery process for a device in which the second securement (e.g., collet) system has been disengaged, the process requires an additional step. For systems in which a retrieval capability is desired, additional filaments can be attached to the proximal tip of the occluder. For example, with reference to
The embodiments and techniques described here are described preferably for use with a device made of a polymer and formed from a single tube, such that the tube is a single monolithic material. The catch mechanism can be all or partly monolithic or integral with the tubular structure, or there can be an absence of any type of bonding or rigid connection to the rest of the tubular structure, in which case there may be some spring force or other force that holds the locking mechanism in place. While the device is thus shown as being substantially formed from a single tubular body, the catch mechanism as described in the embodiments above could be used with other types of devices, including those formed from many pieces, and including devices formed from other materials, including metals, polymers, stainless steel or nitinol.
The term “bioabsorbable,” as used in the description above, is also understood to mean “bioresorbable.”
While the description above refers to strings, filaments, sutures and wires, and while the term “wire” might convey a more rigid piece than a string, a suture or a filament, all these terms are essentially interchangeable, and further include embodiments in which the wire, string, suture or filament is a hollow tube or conduit to allow another wire, as needed, to pass through its longitudinal axis. Each wire, string, suture and filament can be composed of one or more wires, strings, sutures and filaments.
In cases in which the device is made of a polymer, it can be desirable to add an additive or coating to the material to make it radiopaque to make it more visible in a wider variety of imaging techniques.
It will be appreciated that while a particular sequence of steps has been shown and described for purposes of explanation, the sequence may be varied in certain respects, or the steps may be combined, while still obtaining the desired deployment or in some cases to effect deployment in a particular way. For example, the delivery sheath may be advanced or retracted at varying times and in varying degrees, the proximal and distal portions of the occluder may be deployed into the petal configuration in a different sequence, etc. In addition, the steps could be automated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3875648 | Bone | Apr 1975 | A |
3924631 | Mancusi | Dec 1975 | A |
4006747 | Kronenthal et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4007743 | Blake | Feb 1977 | A |
4425908 | Simon | Jan 1984 | A |
4610674 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4626245 | Weinstein | Dec 1986 | A |
4693249 | Schenck et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4696300 | Anderson | Sep 1987 | A |
4710181 | Fuqua | Dec 1987 | A |
4710192 | Liotta et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4738666 | Fuqua | Apr 1988 | A |
4836204 | Landymore et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840623 | Quackenbush | Jun 1989 | A |
4902508 | Badylak et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4915107 | Rebuffat et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917089 | Sideris | Apr 1990 | A |
4921479 | Grayzel | May 1990 | A |
4956178 | Badylak et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5021059 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5037433 | Wilk et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041129 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049131 | Deuss | Sep 1991 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
5149327 | Oshiyama | Sep 1992 | A |
5163131 | Row et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167637 | Okada et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5176659 | Mancini | Jan 1993 | A |
5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222974 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226879 | Ensminger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5236440 | Hlavacek | Aug 1993 | A |
5245023 | Peoples et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257637 | El Gazayerli | Nov 1993 | A |
5275826 | Badylak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282827 | Kensey et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284488 | Sideris | Feb 1994 | A |
5304184 | Hathaway et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312341 | Turi | May 1994 | A |
5312435 | Nash et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320611 | Bonutti et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334217 | Das | Aug 1994 | A |
5350363 | Goode et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354308 | Simon et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364356 | Hofling | Nov 1994 | A |
5411481 | Allen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413584 | Schulze | May 1995 | A |
5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425744 | Fagan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433727 | Sideris | Jul 1995 | A |
5451235 | Lock et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453099 | Lee et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5478353 | Yoon | Dec 1995 | A |
5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
5486193 | Bourne et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507811 | Koike et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562632 | Davila et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577299 | Thompson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601571 | Moss | Feb 1997 | A |
5603703 | Elsberry et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5618311 | Gryskiewicz | Apr 1997 | A |
5620461 | Muijs Van De Moer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626599 | Bourne et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649950 | Bourne et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663063 | Peoples et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683411 | Kavteladze et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690674 | Diaz | Nov 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702421 | Schneidt | Dec 1997 | A |
5709707 | Lock et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713864 | Verkaart | Feb 1998 | A |
5720754 | Middleman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725552 | Kotula et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733294 | Forber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733337 | Carr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741297 | Simon | Apr 1998 | A |
5772641 | Wilson | Jun 1998 | A |
5776162 | Kleshinski | Jul 1998 | A |
5776183 | Kanesaka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797960 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810884 | Kim | Sep 1998 | A |
5820594 | Fontirroche et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823956 | Roth et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829447 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5853420 | Chevillon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853422 | Huebsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855614 | Stevens et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861003 | Latson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865791 | Whayne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879366 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893856 | Jacob et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902287 | Martin | May 1999 | A |
5902319 | Daley | May 1999 | A |
5904703 | Gilson | May 1999 | A |
5919200 | Stambaugh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924424 | Stevens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928250 | Koike et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944691 | Querns et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944738 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955110 | Patel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976174 | Ruiz | Nov 1999 | A |
5980505 | Wilson | Nov 1999 | A |
5989268 | Pugsley, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993475 | Lin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997575 | Whitson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010517 | Baccaro | Jan 2000 | A |
6019753 | Pagan | Feb 2000 | A |
6024756 | Huebsch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027519 | Stanford | Feb 2000 | A |
6030007 | Bassily et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6056760 | Koike et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071998 | Muller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077291 | Das | Jun 2000 | A |
6077880 | Castillo et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079414 | Roth | Jun 2000 | A |
6080182 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096347 | Gedees et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106913 | Scardino et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113609 | Adams | Sep 2000 | A |
6117159 | Buscemi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132438 | Fleischman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143037 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165183 | Kuehn et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165204 | Levinson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168588 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171329 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174322 | Schneidt | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183443 | Kratoska et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187039 | Hiles et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190353 | Garibotto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190357 | Ferrari et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197016 | Fourkas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199262 | Martin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206895 | Levinson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206907 | Marino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214029 | Thill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217590 | Levinson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221092 | Koike et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227139 | Nguyen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228097 | Levinson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231561 | Frazier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245080 | Levinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245537 | Williams et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261309 | Urbanski | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270515 | Linden et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277138 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277139 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287317 | Makower et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290674 | Roue et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299635 | Frantzen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306150 | Levinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312443 | Stone | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312446 | Huebsch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315791 | Gingras et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316262 | Huisman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319263 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322548 | Payne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328727 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334872 | Termin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342064 | Koike et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344048 | Chin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344049 | Levinson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346074 | Roth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348041 | Klint | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352552 | Levinson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355052 | Neuss et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356782 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358238 | Sherry | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364853 | French et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371904 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375625 | French et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375668 | Gifford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375671 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379342 | Levinson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379368 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387104 | Pugsley, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398796 | Levinson | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6402772 | Amplatz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419669 | Van Der Burg et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426145 | Moroni | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436088 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440152 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450987 | Kramer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460749 | Levinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482224 | Michler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488706 | Solymar | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494846 | Margolis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494888 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508828 | Akerfeldt et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514515 | Williams | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548569 | Williams et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551303 | Van Tassel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551344 | Thill | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6585719 | Wang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596013 | Yang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599448 | Ehrhard, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610764 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623508 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623518 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626936 | Stinson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629901 | Huang | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6666861 | Grabek | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669722 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689589 | Huisman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712804 | Roue et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712836 | Berg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726696 | Houser et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6828357 | Martin et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6838493 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867247 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867248 | Martin et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6921410 | Porter | Jul 2005 | B2 |
8118833 | Seibold et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010014800 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025132 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034537 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037129 | Thill | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039435 | Roue et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039436 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041914 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041915 | Roue et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044639 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049492 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010481 | Jayaraman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019648 | Akerfeldt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022859 | Hogendijk | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022860 | Borillo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026208 | Roe et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029048 | Miller | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032459 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032462 | Houser et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035374 | Borillo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020043307 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049457 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052572 | Franco et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058989 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077555 | Schwartz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095174 | Tsugita et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096183 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099389 | Michler et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099390 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103492 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107531 | Schreck et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111637 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111647 | Khairkhahan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120323 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128680 | Pavlovic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129819 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020164729 | Skraly et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169377 | Khairkhahan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183786 | Girton | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183787 | Wahr et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183823 | Pappu | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198563 | Gainor | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004533 | Dieck et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028213 | Thill et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045893 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050665 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055455 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059640 | Marton et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065379 | Babbas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100920 | Akin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139819 | Beer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171774 | Freudenthal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191495 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195530 | Thill | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204203 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040044361 | Franzier et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073242 | Chanduszko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133236 | Chanduszko | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176799 | Chanduszko et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210301 | Obermiller | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040234567 | Dawson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050025809 | Hasirci et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043759 | Chanduszko | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050113868 | Devellian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050267523 | Devellian et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273135 | Chanduszko et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288786 | Chanduszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060122647 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060265004 | Callaghan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271089 | Alejandro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070010851 | Chanduszko et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070167981 | Opolski | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
94 13 645 | Oct 1994 | DE |
0 362 113 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 474 887 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 839 549 | May 1998 | EP |
0 861 632 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1 013 227 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 046 375 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 222 897 | Jul 2002 | EP |
WO-9625179 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-9631157 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9807375 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9808462 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9816174 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9829026 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9851812 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9905977 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9918862 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9918864 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9918864 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9918870 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9918871 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9930640 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9966846 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0027292 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0044428 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0108600 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0119256 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0121247 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0128432 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0130268 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0149185 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0178596 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-01-93783 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0217809 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0224106 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-03024337 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03053493 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03059152 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03077733 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03082076 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03103476 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004032993 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004037333 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043266 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043508 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004052213 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2005006990 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005018728 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005027752 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005074813 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005092203 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110240 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005112779 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006036837 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006102213 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Athanasion, T., “Coronary Artery Bypass with the Use of a Magnetic Distal Anastomotic Device: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Experience,” The Heart Surgery Forum #2004-1024, 2004, 4 pgs. |
Bachthaler, M. et al., “Corrosion of Tungsten Coils After Peripheral Vascular Embolization Theraphy: Influence on Outcome and Tungsten Load”, Catherization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 62, pp. 380-384, 2004. |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 04781644.2, mailed Aug. 23, 2007 (3 Pages). |
Falk, V., “Facilitated Endoscopic Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using a Magentic Coupling Device,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 126,(5), pp. 1575-1579. |
Filsoufi, F., et al., “Automated Distal Coronary Bypass with a Novel Magnetic Coupler (MVP system),” J. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 127(1), pp. 185-192. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US02/40850 mailed Jun. 19, 2003 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/01050, mailed Jul. 8, 2003 (1 pg). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/09051, mailed Sep. 29, 2003 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/17715, mailed Mar. 24, 2004 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/32133, mailed Apr. 22, 2004 (1 pg). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/34003 mailed Oct. 3, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/35479, mailed Apr. 14, 2004 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/35998 mailed Jun. 16, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/39253, mailed Apr. 19, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/022643, mailed Mar. 31, 2005 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/026998, mailed Apr. 22, 2005 (5 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/029978, mailed Jan. 26, 2005 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/006703, mailed Jul. 25, 2005 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/013705 mailed Aug. 4, 2005 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/015382, mailed Oct. 6, 2005 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/34276, mailed 9 Oct. 2007 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/009978, mailed Jul. 13, 2006 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065526, mailed Aug. 8, 2007 (5 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065541, mailed Aug. 7, 2007 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US97/14822, mailed Feb. 20, 1998 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US97/17927, mailed Feb. 10, 1998 (1 pg). |
Isotalo, T. et al., “Biocompatibility Testing of a New Bioabsorbable X-Ray Positive SR-PLA 96/4 Urethral Stent”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 163, pp. 1764-1767, Nov. 1999. |
Klima, U., “Magnetic Vascular Port in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting,” Circulation, 2004, II-55-II-60. |
Parviainen, M. et al., “A New Biodegradable Stent for the Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenal Resection: In Vitro Examination and Pilot Experiences in Humans”, Pancreas, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 14-21, 2000. |
Ruddy, A.C. et al., “Rheological, Mechanical and Thermal Behaviour of Radipaque Filled Polymers”, Polymer Processing Research Centre, School of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast , 5 pages. |
Vaajanen, A. et al., “Expansion and Fixation Properties of a New Braided Biodegradable Urethral Stent: An Experimental Study in the Rabbit”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, pp. 1771-1174, Mar. 2003. |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03729663.9, mailed Jul. 16, 2008 (5 Pages). |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03731562.9, mailed Jul. 18, 2008 (3 Pages). |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03779297.5, mailed Mar. 15, 2007 (6 Pages). |
European Search Report, European Application No. 03729663.9, mailed Feb. 20, 2008 (3 Pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US06/41255, mailed Jun. 13, 2008 (6 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/59429, mailed Sep. 5, 2008 (9 pgs). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU03/00759, filed Jun. 19, 2003. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US07/065546, mailed Oct. 29, 2007. 4 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/17390, mailed Oct. 6, 2003 (4 pgs). |
Kimura, A., et al., “Effects of Neutron Irradiation on the Transformation Behavior in Ti-Ni Alloys,” Abstract, Proceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Mariensitic Transformations, 1992, pp. 935-940. |
Meier, MD, Bernhard et al., “Contemporary Management of Patent Foramen Ovale,” American Heart Association, Inc., Circulation, 2003, vol. 107, pp. 5-9. |
Nat'l Aeronautics and Space Administration, “55-Nitinol—The Alloy with a Memory: Its Physical Metallurgy, Properties and Applications,” NASA Report, pp. 24-25. |
Ramanathan, G., et al., “Experimental and Computational Methods for Shape Memory Alloys,” 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Jun. 2-5, 2002. |
Ruiz, et al, “The Puncture Technique: A New Method for Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2001, vol. 53, pp. 369-372. |
Shabalovskaya, S., “Surface, Corrosion and Biocompatibility Aspects of Nitinol as an Implant Material,” Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, 2002, vol. 12, pp. 69-109. |
SMST-2000, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies,” Apr. 30 to May 4, 2000, Asilomar Conference Center. |
Stockel, “Nitinol Medical Devices and Implants,” SMST-2000 Conference Proceedings, 2001, pp. 531-541. |
Uchil, J., “Shape Memory Alloys—Characterization Techniques,” Pramana—Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 58(5)(6), pp. 1131-1139. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060122647 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60612857 | Sep 2004 | US | |
60662990 | Mar 2005 | US | |
60663289 | Mar 2005 | US | |
60692781 | Jun 2005 | US |