The subject matter described herein relates to an apparatus and method for detecting a position or a change in position of an occupant of an occupant support, such as a hospital bed.
Patients in hospitals, other health care facilities and home care settings may be confined to a bed for an extended period of time. Such beds may include articulable components so that the occupant or a caregiver can adjust the profile of the bed. The beds may also include components for applying selected therapies to the occupant. The use of articulating and therapeutic features may cause the occupant to migrate from an optimum location or position on the bed to another location or position, usually closer to the foot end of the bed. Even if articulating and therapeutic features are unavailable or unused, the occupant can nevertheless migrate from the optimal location to a nonoptimal location. Occupant migration refers to, for example, an involuntary change in occupant position in at least the longitudinal direction, and is distinct from intentional movements such as an occupant voluntarily repositioning himself or being repositioned by a caregiver. The migration, in addition to placing the occupant in a nonoptimal location, can also impose undesirable shear stresses on the occupant's skin. It is, therefore, desirable to monitor occupant location so that a caregiver or automated system can assess the need for a corrective or mitigating action.
The present application describes a method for detecting occupant position change on a support surface. The method includes establishing a rate of change of pressure in a head end test zone and in a foot end test zone, comparing the head end rate to at least one head end rate limit, comparing the foot end rate to at least one foot end rate limit, and inferring, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred. An associated occupant support includes a frame and a mattress. The mattress includes head and foot zones each having at least one pressurizable bladder. The support also includes a controller adapted to compare a head end rate of pressure change to a head end rate limit, to compare a foot end rate of pressure change to a foot end rate limit, and to infer, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.
The subject matter described herein relates to an apparatus and method for detecting a position or a change in position of an occupant of an occupant support, such as a hospital bed. The foregoing and other features of the various embodiments of the occupant support and method described herein will become more apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings in which:
The bed also includes a mattress 60 supported by the frame. The mattress includes a head zone 62 having at least one fluid pressurizable bladder 64 and a foot zone 66 also having at least one fluid pressurizable bladder 68. It should be appreciated that the head zone and foot zone are so named because they are located at or near the head end and foot end extremities of the mattress; the zones do not necessarily correspond exactly to the location of an occupant's head or feet. For reasons that will become apparent the head and foot zones are also referred to herein as head and foot test zones and the bladders in those zones may be referred to as head and foot test bladders. The head zone and the foot zone are longitudinally separated from each other by an intermediate zone 80.
A blower 100 is connected to selected bladders by a network of fluid supply tubes 102 and appropriate valves 104 for supplying fluid, typically ambient air, to the bladders. The blower is connected to each of the head and foot bladder or bladders 64, 68 and to each group of intermediate bladders 82 in architectures that employ intermediate bladders (
A controller 110 communicates with blower 100 by way of a communication link represented by line 112. Pressure readings from pressure transducers 92 are communicated to the controller by communication links represented by lines 114. A user interface 116 allows the bed occupant, a caregiver, or other user to communicate instructions to the controller by way of communication link represented by line 118.
In the above described beds the test bladders, i.e. the head and foot end bladders 64, 68, are a set of one or more bladders in the head zone near the head end of the bed and in the foot zone near the foot end of the bed and are separated from each other by a non-test or intermediate zone which may or may not comprise bladders. The quantity of test bladders depends on the degree of granularity considered to be acceptable to carry out the method described below. As seen in
LF+LH>L−H (1)
In the illustrations the lengths of the test zones are shown as equally apportioned between the head and foot ends of the bed, however unequal apportionment may suffice or even be advantageous.
Alternatively all the bladders on the bed could be employed as test bladders in which case inequality (1) no longer applies.
Controller 110 receives pressure readings from the transducers and operates the blower and valves to maintain bladder pressure in a range bounded by upper and lower limits so that bladder pressure remains approximately equal to a set point pressure. For example, if an occupant's weight shifts partly or completely off a bladder, the fluid pressure in the bladder can decrease to or below the lower limit. In response, the controller operates the blower and valves to increase the pressure to the set point pressure. Conversely, if additional occupant weight shifts onto a bladder, the bladder pressure can increase to or above the upper limit. In response, the controller operates the blower and valves to decrease the pressure to the set point pressure. Such regulation of bladder pressure helps ensure that the magnitude and distribution of the interface pressure imposed on the occupant by the mattress remains satisfactory.
Returning to
Regarding rates of change of pressure, an increase in pressure is considered to be a positive change in pressure so that the corresponding rate of change is also positive. Expressions of relative rates of pressure increase (e.g. the actual rate of pressure increase in comparison to a rate limit) are governed by the magnitude of the rate. For example a pressure increase whose rate is 6 pressure units per unit time is less than or slower than a pressure increase whose rate is 8 pressure units per unit time and greater than or faster than a pressure increase whose rate is 4 pressure units per unit time. A decrease in pressure is considered to be a negative change in pressure so that the corresponding rate of change is also negative. Expressions of relative rates of pressure decrease are governed by the absolute magnitude of the rate. For example a pressure decrease whose rate is 7 pressure units per unit time is less than or slower than a pressure increase whose rate is 9 pressure units per unit time and greater than or faster than a pressure increase whose rate is 5 pressure units per unit time.
At block 134 the controller compares the rate of pressure change in the head zone to at least one head end rate limit, and compares the rate of pressure change in the foot zone to at least one foot end rate limit, which need not have the same magnitude as the head end rate limit, to determine if the rates are consistent with an occupant having migrated longitudinally along the mattress, particularly toward the foot end of the bed. A fast rate of change may suggest nothing more than an occupant having sat up or otherwise acted in a purposeful way to change his location and/or weight distribution on the bed. A slower rate of change may be consistent with the occupant having migrated along the bed. A very slow rate may not suggest anything conclusive and therefore, by default, would be considered inconsistent with occupant migration. An inference can then be made, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred. If the rate comparison suggests that the occupant has migrated along the bed the test is considered to be positive for occupant migration. If the rate comparison suggests that the occupant has not migrated along the bed the test is considered to be negative for occupant migration. Typically the rate comparison will compare the established actual rate of pressure change to an upper rate limit (suggestive of deliberate occupant movement) and will yield a positive result if the rate being tested is slower than the upper rate limit. Alternatively the rate comparison will yield a positive result if the established rate falls within a given range, i.e. if the established rate is slower than an upper rate limit and faster than a lower rate limit. As an example, considering the single head bladder/single foot bladder architecture of
Similar tests of the rate of change of bladder pressure in comparison to one or two limits can be carried out with a mattress architecture having multiple bladders in the head and/or foot zones, such as those of
If the outcome of the rate test is TRUE, the inference of occupant migration can be accepted as conclusive. Alternatively, if the outcome of the rate test is TRUE the inference of occupant migration may be followed by a validation step shown at block 156 and described below in more detail.
Referring back to
For the architectures that use multiple bladders in the head and seat zones the upper and lower rate limits can be the same from bladder to bladder within each zone, in which case the rate limits for all the head zone bladders may or may not be the same as the rate limits for all the foot zone bladders. Alternatively, the rate limits could differ from bladder to bladder. Differing rate limits could improve accuracy by accounting for the weight imposed on the mattress by different parts of an occupant's body (e.g. head, neck, shoulders/upper back, lower back, buttocks, thighs, popliteal region, calves and heels). Bladder specific limits could be associated with individual bladders by way of a user interface 116 and may be based on factors such as occupant height and/or morphology. Moreover, controller 110 can be programmed to reassociate the bladder specific limits from one bladder to the next in response to perceived occupant migration.
According to the method, as the occupant migrates footwardly on the bed, bladder pressure in the head bladder decreases and bladder pressure of the foot bladder increases in the time interval between t0 and t1. When the head end bladder pressure falls below its lower limit and the foot end bladder pressure rises above its upper limit the controller commands operation of the blower and valves appropriate for restoring bladder pressures to the set point pressures. At time t2 the bladder pressures begin to respond. At time t3 the bladder pressures have returned to their set point values. As the occupant continues to migrate footwardly, his weight is transferred progressively off the head zone and onto the foot zone. Accordingly, bladder pressures in those zones undergo additional cycles of change between peak and trough values. At block 170 the method counts the number of pressurization and depressurization cycles that have occurred in the head zone during a time interval Δt. At block 172 the method counts the number of pressurization and depressurization cycles that have occurred in the foot zone during the same time interval Δt. For the head zone the peak pressure is shown as approximately the pressure midway between the lower and upper limits, and the trough pressure is a pressure lower than the lower limit. At blocks 174, 178, 182 a first flag F1 is set if the number of pressure change cycles per unit time in the head zone exceeds a first count threshold T1. At blocks 176, 180, 184 a second flag F2 is set if the number of pressure change cycles per unit time in the foot zone exceeds a second count threshold T2. Block 190 calculates the average peak pressure PPH in the head zone during the time interval under consideration. Block 192 calculates the average trough pressure PTH in the head zone during the same time interval. Blocks 194 and 196 calculate similar time averaged peak and trough pressures PPF, PTF in the foot zone bladders. The method determines ΔPH, the difference between the time average peak and trough pressures in the head zone. At blocks 198, 200, 204 the method determines if that difference of time averaged pressures exceeds a pressure difference threshold T3. If so, the method sets a third flag F3. The method also determines ΔPF, the difference between the time average peak and trough pressures in the foot zone. At blocks 206, 208, 210 the method determines if that difference of time averaged pressures exceeds a pressure difference threshold T4. If so, the method sets a fourth flag F4. As indicated by AND gate 212 the method tests whether all four flags have been set (i.e. all four flags have a TRUE value). If so, the test produces a TRUE result thereby inferring that the occupant has migrated longitudinally along the bed.
In the example of
If the mattress head zone or foot zone has only a single bladder as in
In each of the above described methods the inference drawn from the changes in bladder pressure during an interval of time may be accepted as conclusive. Alternatively, a validation test can be conducted as seen at block 156 of
Other ways of analyzing the dynamics of bladder pressurization are also contemplated. For example in a mattress with a multi-bladdered test zone, rather than comparing pressurization times to standard times, one could compare the relative pressurization times of the bladders to each other. Bladders exhibiting pressurization times that differ by at least a threshold amount, would provide information about the occupant's location on the mattress, particularly if those bladders are adjacent to each other in the same zone and/or the identity of the loaded and unloaded bladders in each zone is consistent with a possible occupant position, satisfactory or otherwise. For example referring again to
If the test zone comprises multiple bladders the bladders can be pressurized for the active test concurrently, nonconcurrently in groups, or nonconcurrently individually.
An alternative to an active test based on bladder pressurization time is to vent the bladder and determine the time required for depressurization. Bladders involved in supporting the occupant will depressurize more quickly than those not involved in supporting the occupant
If the dynamic test is carried out on the basis of bladder pressurization, the test results may benefit from a preliminary step of depressurizing the test bladder prior to pressurizing it. The test results may also benefit from a preliminary step of depressurizing one or more bladders on or both sides of the test bladder.
If the dynamic test is carried out on the basis of bladder depressurization, the test results may benefit from a preliminary step of overpressurizing the test bladder prior to depressurizing it. The test results may also benefit from a preliminary step of depressurizing one or more bladders on either side of the test bladder instead of or in addition to overpressurizing the test bladder.
If patient migration is determined to have occurred, one or more actions can be taken. Examples include issuing an alarm, taking an action intended to mitigate additional migration such as placing the deck in a head down orientation, and taking an action to mitigate any adverse effects of the migration such as the shear and tissue stretch mitigation technique described in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/704,600 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Relieving Shear Induced by an Occupant Support”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Another technique that may be required is to elevate the pressure in any bladder that is perceived to have been subjected to a higher load (i.e. occupant weight) than that particular bladder would have otherwise been expected to bear based on normal occupant weight distribution.
The foregoing disclosure contemplates that controller 110 will carry out an algorithm corresponding to one of the passive tests by default. Alternatively, the controller could be set up so that operation of the algorithm is selectable and deselectable by a user input to user interface 116. In either case, the algorithm's progress is suppressed if the bed (frame or mattress) is adjusted in any way that is predicted to cause the bladder pressures to change in such a way as to mimic the changes associated with occupant migration. In the limit, one might unconditionally suppress the test for any adjustment to the bed rather than try to predict which adjustments might cause a false positive for occupant migration. Example adjustments include changing the angular orientation of a deck section or inflating a turn assist bladder. Alternatively, one could delay the onset of the commanded adjustment until the test progressed to a point where the adjustment wouldn't affect the test. However it is believed this may be less satisfactory to the occupant and/or caregiver, and would also have to exempt time critical adjustments, such as adjusting the bed to a condition suitable for CPR.
Although this disclosure refers to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the subject matter set forth in the accompanying claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/443,234, filed Apr. 10, 2012, which will issue May 23, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,655,795 and which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5092415 | Asano | Mar 1992 | A |
5170364 | Gross et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
6719708 | Jansen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
8090478 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8533879 | Taylor | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8620477 | Skinner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8875331 | Taylor | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9107511 | Skinner | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9329076 | Meyer | May 2016 | B2 |
9510688 | Nunn | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9635953 | Nunn | May 2017 | B2 |
9655457 | Meyer | May 2017 | B2 |
9655795 | O'Keefe et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9833369 | Meyer | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844275 | Nunn | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10251490 | Nunn | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10441086 | Nunn | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10485355 | Yu | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10492619 | Ohno | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10555850 | Meyer | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20080189865 | Bhai | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100063638 | Skinner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110144455 | Young et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120054964 | Stroh et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120174322 | Skinner | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130263378 | O'Keefe et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340168 | Meyer | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140102567 | Skinner | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140123390 | Meyer | May 2014 | A1 |
20140259418 | Nunn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259434 | Nunn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277778 | Nunn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140026327 | Taylor | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150182400 | Meyer | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20170049243 | Nunn | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170086598 | Ohno | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170196369 | Nunn | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170224560 | Meyer | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170246062 | O'Keefe | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180064593 | Meyer | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190021513 | Nunn | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190075931 | Yu | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190174931 | Ohno | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190231084 | Nunn | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190328147 | Palashewski | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200054149 | Ohno | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1093755 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2301429 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2320759 | Jul 1998 | GB |
2453371 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2006135845 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007016054 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2009120270 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2011113070 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Official Letter in Application No. 13 162 972.7-1657, dated Mar. 17, 2017. |
EP Search Report for EP Application 13162972.7—dated Aug. 20, 2013; Place of Search—The Hague; Date of Completion of the Search—Aug. 6, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170246062 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13443234 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 15597784 | US |