The invention relates to optical scanning systems, particularly to devices for positioning an object to be scanned relative to an optical scanner.
The use of hand held devices for optical character recognition (OCR) has many applications in industry, but the nature of OCR requires that the read distance be consistent and that the angle of incidence be minimal (read head close to perpendicular is preferred with slight adjustments made to reduce reflected light). Since in postal applications, most regions of interest will be on the top surface of the item, the manual operation of a standard handheld device would require potentially awkward repetitive motion of the operator and read problems could occur if the height and angle of incidence are not within the appropriate range for the OCR scanner. A hand held device is convenient for reading a wide variety of item sizes and shapes, but the acceptable read rate is reliant on the accuracy of positioning of the device by the operator. The present invention relates to an OCR device that can overcome these problems while retaining most of the flexibility of a hand held scanner.
A targeting device of the invention suitable for mounting an optical scanner thereon for scanning a surface of an object includes a frame, a linkage slidably mounted on the frame, an actuator arm secured to the linkage, which actuator arm has an outer surface configured to slidingly engage the surface of the object to be scanned and move in tandem with the linkage along the frame when the object to be scanned is inserted between the actuator arm and a support surface below the actuator arm, and a holder mounted on the linkage configured to mount the optical scanner thereon at a predetermined scanning distance from the object to be scanned engaged by the actuator arm. The scanning device may be an optical character reader or another type of scanner, such as a bar code scanner. Such a targeting device according to the invention minimizes operator repetitive motion, allows for increased throughput of reads, and sets optimal read height for scanning mail pieces for OCR applications. This device will allow the operator to quickly scan packages, letters and flat mail by either sliding the piece across a small platform or setting the piece on a platform with a manual or automatic positioning of the read head above the package.
In an alternate embodiment, a targeting device suitable for mounting an optical scanner thereon for scanning a surface of an object includes a frame, a linkage slidably mounted on the frame and a holder mounted on the linkage configured to mount the optical scanner thereon. A stop member coupled to the linkage extends downwardly to stop downward vertical movement of the linkage such that the optical scanner is positioned at a predetermined scanning distance from an object to be scanned. The targeting device may include a switch mounted on a distal end of the stop member for activating the scanner when the scanner contacts the surface of the object to be scanned.
In the accompanying drawings:
The device of the invention will allow for high volume manual processing of OCR read labels on postal packages, letters, flats and similar objects while optimizing the read depth and targeting the read area for the operator. The operator will manually move the mail piece into position, while the fixture will indicate the location of the read area of the scan head with light emitting diodes that indicate the perimeter. This device can be employed in at least two embodiments, with the preferred embodiment being dependent on the application.
Referring to
A holder or bracket 32 mounted on linkage 24 is configured to hold an optical character scanner 34 at a predetermined scanning distance above mail piece 15 when the mail piece is engaged beneath actuator arm 16. As best illustrated in
Referring to
After optical scanner 34 has captured an image of mail piece 15, the operator continues to slide the mail piece across support surface 28 and out from beneath actuator arm 16. As mail piece 15 is removed from under actuator arm 16, the actuator arm linkage 24 is lowered to an initial position with a counterbalance mechanism 44. As best illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring to
Since linear track system 74 is dampened for the mass of scanner 34 and linkage 72, the operator can lower or raise linkage 72 as needed with minimal effort, and the scanner will stay in position until moved. This embodiment may be preferred when processing in batches of similar height such as letter mail or flats.
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. For example, the frame could be mounted in a cantilevered position from a vertical wall, and an adjoining surface (such as the top of a table) could be used for positioning mail pieces for scanning, eliminating need for a horizontal base. It will also be appreciated that a such a device could receive and scan a series of mail pieces of varying sizes from an automated feeder that advances them one at a time, in either a horizontal or vertical position. The frame of the scanner fixture could also include provision for mounting a bar code printing device that will allow the operator to attach a bar code label to each processed mail piece once the OCR read has produced an address or other information of interest (if used in applications other than postal type operations). All such variations and additions are specifically contemplated to be with the scope of the invention. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This application claims priority based on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/462,622, filed Apr. 14, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4574318 | Dayton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4691909 | Owada et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4916550 | Miyake et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5010420 | Hasegawa et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5477044 | Aragon | Dec 1995 | A |
5539193 | Gibbs et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5640252 | Turner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5757519 | Yoo | May 1998 | A |
5796495 | Miyata et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5978103 | Welsh | Nov 1999 | A |
6097507 | Bohn | Aug 2000 | A |
6323964 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6410931 | Dvorkis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459505 | Swartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7092132 | Matsuda | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7268924 | Hussey et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20050269473 | Carnevali et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050008265 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60462622 | Apr 2003 | US |