All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to devices that are implanted within the eye and delivery systems for such devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to delivery system for devices that facilitate the transfer of fluid from within one area of the eye to another area of the eye.
According to a draft report by The National Eye Institute (NEI) at The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH), glaucoma is now the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and the second leading cause of blindness, behind cataract, in the world. Thus, the NEI draft report concludes, “it is critical that significant emphasis and resources continue to be devoted to determining the pathophysiology and management of this disease.” Glaucoma researchers have found a strong correlation between high intraocular pressure and glaucoma. For this reason, eye care professionals routinely screen patients for glaucoma by measuring intraocular pressure using a device known as a tonometer. Many modern tonometers make this measurement by blowing a sudden puff of air against the outer surface of the eye.
The eye can be conceptualized as a ball filled with fluid. There are two types of fluid inside the eye. The cavity behind the lens is filled with a viscous fluid known as vitreous humor. The cavities in front of the lens are filled with a fluid know as aqueous humor. Whenever a person views an object, he or she is viewing that object through both the vitreous humor and the aqueous humor.
Whenever a person views an object, he or she is also viewing that object through the cornea and the lens of the eye. In order to be transparent, the cornea and the lens can include no blood vessels. Accordingly, no blood flows through the cornea and the lens to provide nutrition to these tissues and to remove wastes from these tissues. Instead, these functions are performed by the aqueous humor. A continuous flow of aqueous humor through the eye provides nutrition to portions of the eye (e.g., the cornea and the lens) that have no blood vessels. This flow of aqueous humor also removes waste from these tissues.
Aqueous humor is produced by an organ known as the ciliary body. The ciliary body includes epithelial cells that continuously secrete aqueous humor. In a healthy eye, a stream of aqueous humor flows out of the anterior chamber of the eye through the trabecular meshwork and into Schlemm's canal as new aqueous humor is secreted by the epithelial cells of the ciliary body. This excess aqueous humor enters the venous blood stream from Schlemm's canal and is carried along with the venous blood leaving the eye.
When the natural drainage mechanisms of the eye stop functioning properly, the pressure inside the eye begins to rise. Researchers have theorized prolonged exposure to high intraocular pressure causes damage to the optic nerve that transmits sensory information from the eye to the brain. This damage to the optic nerve results in loss of peripheral vision. As glaucoma progresses, more and more of the visual field is lost until the patient is completely blind.
In addition to drug treatments, a variety of surgical treatments for glaucoma have been performed. For example, shunts were implanted to direct aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the extraocular vein (Lee and Scheppens, “Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure,” Investigative Opthalmology (February 1966)). Other early glaucoma treatment implants led from the anterior chamber to a sub-conjunctival bleb (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,968,296 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,180,362). Still others were shunts leading from the anterior chamber to a point just inside Schlemm's canal (Spiegel et al., “Schlemm's canal implant: a new method to lower intraocular pressure in patients with POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers (June 1999); U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984; U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984). Delivery and deployment systems for some glaucoma implants are described, e.g., in US 2007/0191863 and US 2007/0010827. Surgical devices for accessing Schlemm's canal are described, e.g., in US 2007/0073275 and US 2006/0149194.
The present invention relates generally to ocular implants (such as, e.g., those used for glaucoma treatment) and their delivery systems. In particular, the invention relates to ocular implants and their delivery systems useful to treat glaucoma.
New glaucoma treatment implants are described in commonly assigned U.S. Ser. No. 11/860,318, “Ocular Implants,” filed Sep. 24, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein. Prior ocular implant delivery systems cannot effectively be used to deliver and deploy the implants described therein. In addition, delivery systems used to deliver and deploy earlier glaucoma treatment implants fail to address certain delivery system needs.
On aspect of the invention provides a method of inserting an ocular implant into a patient's eye, the ocular implant being mounted on a carrier, with the method including the following steps: inserting a cannula into an anterior chamber of the eye; moving a distal exit port of the cannula into communication with Schlemm's canal; and advancing the ocular implant and carrier through an exit port of the cannula into Schlemm's canal. In embodiments in which the ocular implant has a plurality of openings, the method further includes the step of advancing the ocular implant and carrier into Schlemm's canal with the carrier blocking the implant openings.
In some embodiments, the inserting step includes the step of inserting the cannula through a cornea of the eye. In some embodiments, the passing step includes the step of advancing the ocular implant with a handheld actuator disposed exterior to the eye.
In some embodiments, the advancing step includes the step of moving a blunt distal surface into Schlemm's canal. The advancing step may also include the step of extending the ocular implant 60°-180° around Schlemm's canal.
In some embodiments, the method includes the step of rotating the implant within Schlemm's canal. Some embodiments of the method include the step of disengaging the ocular implant from the carrier, such as by moving at least one of the carrier and the ocular implant with respect to the other by, e.g., applying a distally directed force on the implant while applying a proximally directed force on the carrier. The step of applying a distally directed force may include the step of applying a distally directed force on the ocular implant with a pusher disposed in the cannula.
In some embodiments in which the carrier has a reduced diameter portion, the disengaging step may include the step of orienting the ocular implant with respect to the reduced diameter portion of the carrier. The advancing step may also include the step of advancing the ocular implant with a pusher having an implant engagement mechanism, in which case the disengaging step includes the step of orienting the ocular implant and an implant engagement mechanism of the pusher with respect to the reduced diameter portion of the carrier.
Some embodiments include the step of removing the carrier from the eye. The method may also include the step of ceasing advancement of the implant into Schlemm's canal when a proximal portion of the implant remains in the anterior chamber and a distal portion of the implant lies in Schlemm's canal. The method may also include the delivery of material through the carrier into Schlemm's canal.
Another aspect of the invention provides an ocular implant and delivery system having a cannula with a distal exit port adapted to be inserted into a Schlemm's canal portion of an eye; an ocular implant; a carrier disposed within the implant and movable with the implant within the cannula; and a proximal control adapted to be operated from exterior to an eye to move at least one of the carrier and the implant when the distal exit port of the cannula is within the eye.
In some embodiments, the ocular implant has a plurality of openings and the carrier is oriented to block the openings. The ocular implant and carrier together may form a blunt distal end. In some embodiments, the cannula forms an arc of a circle having, e.g., a radius of curvature less than about 0.1 inches and may have a diameter less than about 0.03 inches.
In some embodiments, the carrier has a larger diameter portion and a smaller diameter portion, with the ocular implant being engaged with the larger diameter portion of the carrier. Such embodiments may also include a pusher disposed within the cannula and engaged with the ocular implant, the pusher being operably connected to the proximal control. The pusher may have an implant engagement mechanism adapted to hold an ocular implant during advancement out of the exit port of the cannula. The ocular implant may be engaged with the implant engagement mechanism when the implant is disposed between the larger diameter portion of the carrier and the implant engagement mechanism, and the ocular implant may be disengaged with the implant engagement mechanism when the implant is disposed between the smaller diameter portion of the carrier and the implant engagement mechanism.
In some embodiments, the carrier has a material delivery lumen in communication with a material inlet in the proximal control.
In some embodiments, the proximal control has a distal handle connected to the cannula and a proximal handle with a carrier movement actuator, the proximal handle and the distal handle being movable with respect to each other. The proximal handle may also have an implant movement actuator.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method of inserting an ocular implant into a patient's eye including the following steps: inserting a cannula into an anterior chamber of the eye; moving a distal cutting portion of the cannula through trabecular meshwork into Schlemm's canal until a cannula stop element engages the trabecular meshwork; and passing the ocular implant through an exit port of the cannula into Schlemm's canal after engaging the stop element with the trabecular meshwork.
In some embodiments, the inserting step includes the step of inserting the cannula through a cornea of the eye. In some embodiments, the passing step includes the step of advancing the ocular implant with a handheld actuator disposed exterior to the eye.
In some embodiments, the passing step includes the step of moving a blunt distal surface into Schlemm's canal. The passing step may also include the step of extending the ocular implant 60°-180° around Schlemm's canal.
The method may also include one or more of the steps of rotating the implant within Schlemm's canal; maintaining forward pressure on the cannula while deforming at least a portion of the cannula during the passing step; and/or disengaging the ocular implant from a delivery tool. In some embodiments in which the delivery tool includes a pusher, the passing step includes the step of advancing a distal portion of the ocular implant through the exit port of the cannula with the pusher.
Some embodiments of the passing step include the step of advancing the implant into Schlemm's canal over a carrier. Such methods may also include the step of removing the carrier from the eye such as, e.g., by disengaging the ocular implant from the carrier. In some embodiments, material is delivered through the carrier into Schlemm's canal. Some embodiments of the invention also include the step of ceasing advancement of the implant into Schlemm's canal when a proximal portion of the implant remains in the anterior chamber and a distal portion of the implant lies in Schlemm's canal.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an ocular implant system including a cannula with an implant lumen, a distal exit port, a distal cutting portion at least partially defining the exit port, and a stop element limiting passage of the distal cutting portion into an anatomical lumen at a point in which the exit port is within the lumen; and a proximal control adapted to be operated from exterior to an eye when the distal exit port of the cannula is within the eye.
In some embodiments, the cannula forms an arc of a circle having, e.g., a radius of curvature less than about 0.1 inches and/or a diameter less than about 0.03 inches. The cutting portion may have a cutting edge angled with respect to a central axis of the cannula, with the cutting edge being at an angle of between about 10 degrees and about 80 degrees with respect to the central axis in some embodiments. Some embodiments may also have the stop element disposed at a proximal extent of the cutting edge.
Some embodiments include a carrier disposed within the cannula and adapted to support an implant and sized to pass through the exit port. Such embodiments may also have an ocular implant engaged with the carrier. In embodiments in which the carrier has a larger diameter portion and a smaller diameter portion, the ocular implant may be engaged with the larger diameter portion of the carrier. The carrier may also have a material delivery lumen.
Some embodiments of the invention also include a pusher disposed within the cannula and engaged with the ocular implant, the pusher being operably connected to the proximal control. Such embodiments may also include an implant engagement mechanism adapted to hold an ocular implant during advancement out of the exit port of the cannula.
In some embodiments, the proximal control has a distal handle connected to the cannula and a proximal handle with a carrier movement actuator, the proximal handle and the distal handle being movable with respect to each other. The proximal handle may also have an implant movement actuator.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are numbered identically. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict exemplary embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Examples of constructions, materials, dimensions, and manufacturing processes are provided for selected elements. All other elements employ that which is known to those of skill in the field of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the examples provided have suitable alternatives that can be utilized.
As shown in
In this embodiment, cutting portion 110 is formed from two convex edges 112 meeting at a tip 114. In other embodiments, the cutting edges can be concave or straight. As shown, edges 112 extend from tip 114 to a pair of optional stops 116 formed at the intersection of edges 112 with an optional cannula extension portion 118. As shown in
In some embodiments, cannula 102 is formed from transparent polycarbonate tubing having a diameter less than about 0.030 inches, e.g., an outer diameter of 0.028 inches and an inner diameter of 0.014 inches. In embodiments with cutting edges leading to stops, the cutting edges may be at angles of between about 10° and 80° with respect to the cannula's central axis, and the stops may be located approximately one-half diameter inward of tip 114. In embodiments with a cannula extension portion, the extension portion 118 may extend approximately 1.5 mm beyond tip 114. Among other functions, the bending of extension portion 118 while forward pressure is maintained on the cannula (as shown, e.g., in
During delivery, ocular implant 100 is mounted on a carrier 120 which is movable with implant 100 within cannula 102. Among other functions, one particular function of carrier 120 is to block the openings 122 formed in implant 100 so as to minimize interference between the implant and tissue within Schlemm's canal 104 as the implant is advanced. The ocular implant 100 has a blunt distal end 124 in this embodiment to avoid damage to ocular tissue. In other embodiments, the blunt distal end may be provided at least in part by the carrier.
In this embodiment, a pusher 126 is engaged with the proximal end 128 of ocular implant 100, as shown in
When only the proximal end 128 of implant 100 remains in the anterior chamber 101, advancement of the implant into Schlemm's canal ceases. Depending on the design of the ocular implant, the implant may extend 60°-180° around Schlemm's canal at this point. Also, at this time or prior to it, the implant may be rotated within Schlemm's canal to attain the appropriate orientation. A proximal force can then be applied to carrier 120 (by, e.g., an external actuator or control) to withdraw the carrier proximally from the implant 100 while pusher 126 applies a distally directed force (once again by, e.g., an external actuator or control) to hold implant 100 in place, as shown in
To disengage the implant from the delivery system, carrier 200 is withdrawn proximally (or, alternatively, the implant is moved forward distally) until the reduced diameter portion 202 lies within the implant's proximal portion 128 and collar 208, as shown in
A luer fitting 320 (or other suitable connector) at the distal end of distal handle 302 is provided to engage with the proximal end of a cannula (not shown), such as the cannula described above. Advancement of a cannula and implant into a patient's eye can therefore be controlled by movement of distal handle 302 with respect to the eye. In some embodiments, the exterior surface of proximal push tube 308 has at least one flat surface (such as a hexagonal surface) that mates with a corresponding shape on the inner surface of distal handle 302 so that rotation of handle 302 with respect to the cannula rotates the pusher and the implant.
A braided tube 322 extends proximally from a proximal end of distal handle 302 to a distal end of proximal handle 300 through distal and proximal strain relief portions 324 and 326, respectively. Braided tube 322 permits handles 300 and 302 to be rotated with respect to each other, thereby preventing any unintentional rotation of handle 300 from rotating handle 302.
Proximal push tube 308 extends proximally through distal handle 302 and braided tube 322 to a push tube stop 328 within proximal handle 300, to which it is bonded. Stop 328 is held in place within a push tube actuator 332 by a plug 330. In this embodiment, stop 328 and proximal push tube 308 are free to rotate relative to push tube actuator 332. Push tube actuator 332 has exterior threads mating with interior threads of a stationary handle portion 333. Proximal core tube 314 extends further proximally beyond proximal push tube 308 to a core tube stop 334, to which it is bonded. Stop 334 is held in place within a core tube actuator 336 by a domed plug 338. In this embodiment, stop 334 and core proximal core tube 314 are free to rotate relative to core tube actuator 336. Core tube actuator 336 has exterior threads mating with interior threads of push tube actuator 332.
The two handle design of this embodiment permits two person operation of the ocular implant and delivery system. In use, an ocular implant (such as that described above) is mounted on carrier 304 and placed within a cannula (such as that described above) attached to luer fitting 320 of distal handle 302. Under visual observation using a goniolens, a surgeon advances the distal end of the cannula through an opening in the patient's cornea into the anterior chamber of the eye by advancing distal handle 302. When the cannula has cut through the trabecular meshwork to place the cannula's distal exit port into communication with Schlemm's canal, an assistant holding proximal handle 300 advances the carrier and implant out of the cannula's distal exit port by simultaneously turning actuators 332 and 336, which, due to the mating threads of actuator 332 and handle portion 333, moves push tube 308 and carrier 304 distally with respect to handle portion 333, distal handle 302 and the cannula.
When the implant has been advanced a sufficient distance into Schlemm's canal, the implant is disengaged from the delivery system by turning actuator 336 with respect to actuator 332 to move the carrier 304 proximally with respect to the push tube 308, thereby keeping the implant stationary while the carrier is withdrawn. After the implant has been deployed and disengaged from the delivery system, the pusher, carrier and cannula are removed from the patient's eye.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3948271 | Akiyama | Apr 1976 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4428746 | Mendez | Jan 1984 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4826478 | Schocket | May 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4934809 | Volk | Jun 1990 | A |
4936825 | Ungerleider | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127901 | Odrich | Jul 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5213569 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5246452 | Sinnott | Sep 1993 | A |
5360399 | Stegmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5454796 | Krupin | Oct 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5591223 | Lock et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5792099 | DeCamp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807302 | Wandel | Sep 1998 | A |
5865831 | Cozean et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879319 | Pynson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5948427 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6186974 | Allan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221078 | Bylsma | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238409 | Hojeibane | May 2001 | B1 |
D444874 | Haffner et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6375642 | Grieshaber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409752 | Boatman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464724 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471666 | Odrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494857 | Neuhann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508779 | Suson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533764 | Haffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544208 | Ethier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6626858 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6666841 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699210 | Williams et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699211 | Savage | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D490152 | Myall et al. | May 2004 | S |
6730056 | Ghaem et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783544 | Lynch et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827699 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827700 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881198 | Brown | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6939298 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955656 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962573 | Wilcox | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981958 | Gharib et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6989007 | Shadduck | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7094225 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7135009 | Tu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163543 | Smedley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186232 | Smedley et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7192412 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7207965 | Simon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207980 | Christian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220238 | Lynch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273475 | Tu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7297130 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7699882 | Stamper et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7931596 | Rachlin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967772 | McKenzie et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8012115 | Karageozian | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034105 | Stegmann et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8123729 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8372026 | Schieber et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010002438 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020003546 | Mochimaru et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013572 | Berlin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020072673 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004457 | Andersson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055372 | Lynch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060748 | Baikoff | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093084 | Nissan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097151 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030181848 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236484 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024345 | Gharib et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024453 | Castillejos | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082939 | Berlin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088048 | Richter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098124 | Freeman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102729 | Haffner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106975 | Solovay et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127843 | Tu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147870 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193095 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193262 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210181 | Vass et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210185 | Tu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216749 | Tu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225357 | Worst et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249333 | Bergheim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254519 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260228 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050041200 | Rich | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090806 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090807 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107734 | Coroneo | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119601 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2005 | A9 |
20050119636 | Haffner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125003 | Pinchuk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131514 | Hijlkema et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154443 | Linder et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165385 | Simon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192527 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197667 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203542 | Weber et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209549 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209550 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244464 | Hughes | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250788 | Tu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260186 | Bookbinder et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266047 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273033 | Grahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277864 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288619 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288745 | Andersen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020247 | Kagan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032507 | Tu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052879 | Kolb | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069340 | Simon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074375 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079828 | Brown | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084907 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106370 | Baerveldt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116626 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149194 | Conston et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154981 | Klimko et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155238 | Shields | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155300 | Stamper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173397 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189915 | Camras et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189916 | Bas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189917 | Mayr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195055 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195056 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195187 | Stegmann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241749 | Tu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070010827 | Tu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073275 | Conston et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088432 | Solovay et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106200 | Levy | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106236 | Coroneo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112292 | Tu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118147 | Smedley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179520 | West | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202186 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070265582 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270945 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276315 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276316 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282244 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282245 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293807 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298068 | Badawi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015488 | Tu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045878 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058704 | Hee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090005852 | Gittings et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028953 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030363 | Gellman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030381 | Lind et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043321 | Conston et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069786 | Vesely et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104248 | Rapacki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138081 | Bergheim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090182421 | Silvestrini et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090281520 | Highley et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004580 | Lynch et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057072 | Roman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121342 | Schieber et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100173866 | Hee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100222733 | Schieber et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234726 | Sirimanne et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234790 | Tu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110009874 | Wardle et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009958 | Wardle et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110319806 | Wardle | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010702 | Stegmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120179087 | Schieber et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120323159 | Wardle et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006165 | Euteneuer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199876197 | Feb 1999 | AU |
1950091 | Apr 2007 | CN |
19840047 | Mar 2000 | DE |
1615604 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2193821 | Jun 2010 | EP |
1715827 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2380622 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2468327 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2471563 | Jul 2012 | EP |
1833440 | Aug 2012 | EP |
11123205 | May 1999 | JP |
2007181714 | Jul 2007 | JP |
WO 0007525 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0064389 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0064393 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0197727 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0236052 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02074052 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02080811 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03015659 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03045290 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004093761 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005105197 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006066103 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007035356 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007047744 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007087061 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2008002377 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/131,030, filed Apr. 26, 1999, Lynch. |
Schieber et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/860,318 entitled “Ocular implants,” filed Sep. 24, 2007. |
Schieber et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/236,225 entitled “Ocular implants with asymmetric flexibility,” filed Sep. 23, 2008. |
Schieber et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/236,254 entitled “Ocular implant architectures,” filed Sep. 23, 2008. |
Bahler, et al.; Trabecular bypass stents decrease intraocular pressure in cultured human anterior segments; Amer. Journal of Ophthalmology; vol. 138, No. 6; pp. 988-994.e2; Dec. 2004. |
D'Ermo, et al.; Our results with the operation of ab externo trabeculotomy; Ophthalmologica; vol. 163; pp. 347-355; 1971. |
Johnstone et al.; “Microsurgery of Schlemm's Canal and the Human Aqueous Outflow System;” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 76 (6): 906-917; Dec. 1973. |
Lee et al.; Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies; Investigative Ophthalmology; vol. 5; No. 1; pp. 59-64; Feb. 1966. |
Mäepea et al.; The pressures in the episcleral veins, schlemm's canal and the trabecular meshwork in monkeys: effects of changes in intraocular pressure; Exp. Eye Res.; vol. 49; pp. 645-663; 1989. |
Savage, James; Gonioscopy in the management of glaucoma; Am. Academy of Ophthalmology; Focal Points; vol. XXIV; No. 3; pp. 1-14; Mar. 2006. |
Schultz, Jared; Canaloplasty procedure shows promise for open-angle glaucoma in European study; Ocular Surgery News; vol. 34; Mar. 1, 2007. |
Spiegel et al.; Schlemm's canal implant: a new method to lower intraocular pressure in patients with POAG?; Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers; vol. 30; No. 6; pp. 492-494; Jun. 1999. |
Ellingsen et al.; Trabeculotomy and sinusotomy in enucleated human eyes; Investigative Ophthalmology; vol. 11; pp. 21-28; Jan. 1972. |
Grant; Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes; Archives of Ophthalmology; vol. 69; pp. 783-801; Jun. 1963. |
Smit et al.; Effects of viscoelastic injection into schlemm's canal in primate and human eyes; J. Am. Academy of Ophthalmology; vol. 109; No. 4; pp. 786-792; Apr. 2002. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,847 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Treating Glaucoma,” filed Mar. 5, 2009. |
Wardle et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,451 entitled “Ocular Implant System and Method,” filed Oct. 25, 2010. |
Moses, Robert; The effect of intraocular pressure on resistance to outflow; Survey of Ophthalmology; vol. 22; No. 2; pp. 88-100; Sep.-Oct. 1977. |
Rosenquist et al.; Outflow resistance of enucleated human eyes at two different perfusion pressures and different extents of trabeculotomy; Current Eye Res.; vol. 8; No. 12; pp. 1233-1240; Dec. 1989. |
Wardle et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/330,592 entitled “Delivering Ocular Implants Into the Eye,” filed Dec. 19, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090132040 A1 | May 2009 | US |