The present invention generally relates to improved medical devices and methods for the reduction of elevated pressure in organs of the human body. More particularly, the present invention relates to the treatment of glaucoma by implanting a glaucoma stent in an eye to reduce the intraocular pressure, wherein the glaucoma stent is to drain aqueous from the anterior chamber by bypassing diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and use/restore existing outflow pathways.
About two percent of people in the United States have glaucoma. Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that causes pathological changes in the optic disk and corresponding visual field loss resulting in blindness if untreated. Intraocular pressure elevation is the major etiologic factor in all glaucomas.
In glaucomas associated with an elevation in eye pressure the source of resistance to outflow is in the trabecular meshwork. The tissue of the trabecular meshwork allows the “aqueous” to enter Schlemm's canal, which then empties into aqueous collector channels in the posterior wall of Schlemm's canal and then into aqueous veins. The aqueous or aqueous humor is a transparent liquid that fills the region between the cornea at the front of the eye and the lens. The aqueous humor is constantly secreted by the ciliary body around the lens, so there is a continuous flow of the aqueous humor from the ciliary body to the eye's front chamber. The eye's pressure is determined by a balance between the production of aqueous and its exit through the trabecular meshwork (major route) or via uveal scleral outflow (minor route). The trabecular meshwork is located between the outer rim of the iris and the internal periphery of the cornea. The portion of the trabecular meshwork adjacent to Schlemm's canal causes most of the resistance to aqueous outflow (juxtacanilicular meshwork).
Glaucoma is grossly classified into two categories: closed-angle glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma. The closed-angle glaucoma is caused by closure of the anterior angle by contact between the iris and the inner surface of the trabecular meshwork. Closure of this anatomical angle prevents normal drainage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye. Open-angle glaucoma is any glaucoma in which the angle of the anterior chamber remains open, but the exit of aqueous through the trabecular meshwork is diminished. The exact cause for diminished filtration is unknown for most cases of open-angle glaucoma. However, there are secondary open-angle glaucomas that may include edema or swelling of the trabecular spaces (from steroid use), abnormal pigment dispersion, or diseases such as hyperthyroidism that produce vascular congestion.
All current therapies for glaucoma are directed at decreasing intraocular pressure. This is initially by medical therapy with drops or pills that reduce the production of aqueous humor or increase the outflow of aqueous. However, these various drug therapies for glaucoma are sometimes associated with significant side effects, such as headache, blurred vision, allergic reactions, death from cardiopulmonary complications and potential interactions with other drugs. When the drug therapy fails, surgical therapy is used. Surgical therapy for open-angle glaucoma consists of laser (trabeculoplasty), trabeculectomy and aqueous shunting implants after failure of trabeculectomy or if trabeculectomy is unlikely to succeed. Trabeculectomy is a major surgery that is most widely used and is augmented with topically applied anticancer drugs such as 5-flurouracil or mitomycin-c to decrease scarring and increase surgical success.
Approximately 100,000 trabeculectomies are performed on Medicare age patients per year in the United States. This number would increase if the morbidity associated with trabeculectomy could be decreased. The current morbidity associated with trabeculectomy consists of failure (10-15%), infection (a life long risk about 2-5%), choroidal hemorrhage (1%, a severe internal hemorrhage from pressure too low resulting in visual loss), cataract formation, and hypotony maculopathy (potentially reversible visual loss from pressure too low).
If it were possible to bypass the local resistance to outflow of aqueous at the point of the resistance and use existing outflow mechanisms, surgical morbidity would greatly decrease. The reason for this is that the episcleral aqueous veins have a backpressure that would prevent the eye pressure from going too low. This would virtually eliminate the risk of hypotony maculopathy and choroidal hemorrhage. Furthermore, visual recovery would be very rapid and risk of infection would be very small (a reduction from 2-5% to 0.05%). Because of these reasons surgeons have tried for decades to develop a workable surgery for the trabecular meshwork.
The previous techniques, which have been tried, are goniotomy/trabeculotomy, and other mechanical disruption of the trabecular meshwork, such as trabeculopuncture, goniophotoablation, laser trabecular ablation and goniocurretage. They are briefly described below.
Goniotomy/Trabeculotomy: Goniotomy and trabeculotomy are simple and directed techniques of microsurgical dissection with mechanical disruption of the trabecular meshwork. These initially had early favorable responses in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. However, long-term review of surgical results showed only limited success in adults. In retrospect, these procedures probably failed secondary to repair mechanisms and a process of “filling in”. The filling in is the result of a healing process that has the detrimental effect of collapsing and closing in of the created opening throughout the trabecular meshwork. Once the created openings close, the pressure builds back up and the surgery fails.
Trabeculopuncture: Q-switched Neodymium (Nd):YAG lasers also have been investigated as an optically invasive technique for creating full-thickness holes in trabecular meshwork. However, the relatively small hole created by this trabeculopuncture technique exhibits a filling in effect and fails.
Goniophotoablation/Laser Trabecular Ablation: Goniophotoablation is disclosed by Berlin in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,172, and describes the use of an excimer laser to treat glaucoma by ablating the trabecular meshwork. This was not demonstrated by clinical trial to succeed. Hill et al. used an Erbium:YAG laser to create full thickness holes through trabecular meshwork (Hill et al., Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 11:341-346, 1991). This technique was investigated in a primate model and a limited human clinical trial at the University of California, Irvine. Although morbidity was zero in both trials, success rates did not warrant further human trials. Failure again was from filling in of created defects in trabecular meshwork by repair mechanisms. Neither of these is a valid surgical technique for the treatment of glaucoma.
Goniocurretage: This is an ab-interno (from the inside) mechanical disruptive technique. This uses an instrument similar to a cyclodialysis spatula with a microcurrette at the tip. Initial results are similar to trabeculotomy that fails secondary to repair mechanisms and a process of filling in.
Although trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed filtering surgery, Viscocanulostomy (VC) and non-penetrating trabeculectomy (NPT) are two new variations of filtering surgery. These are ab-externo (from the outside), major ocular procedures in which Schlemm's canal is surgically exposed by making a large and very deep scleral flap. In the VC procedure, Schlemm's canal is cannulated and viscoelastic substance injected (which dilates Schlemm's canal and the aqueous collector channels). In the NPT procedure, the inner wall of Schlemm's canal is stripped off after surgically exposing the canal.
Trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT are performed under a conjunctival and scleral flap, such that the aqueous humor is drained onto the surface of the eye or into the tissues located within the lateral wall of the eye. Normal physiological outflows are not used. These surgical operations are major procedures with significant ocular morbidity. When Trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT are thought to have a low chance for success, a number of implantable drainage devices have been used to ensure that the desired filtration and outflow of aqueous humor through the surgical opening will continue. The risk of placing a glaucoma drainage implant also includes hemorrhage, infection and postoperative double vision that is a complication unique to drainage implants.
All of the above embodiments and variations thereof have numerous disadvantages and moderate success rates. They involve substantial trauma to the eye and require great surgical skill by creating a hole over the full thickness of the sclera/cornea into the subconjunctival space. Furthermore, normal physiological outflow pathways are not used. The procedures are mostly performed in an operating room generating a facility fee, anesthesiologist's professional fee and have a prolonged recovery time for vision. The complications of filtration surgery have inspired ophthalmic surgeons to look at other approaches to lowering intraocular pressure.
The trabecular meshwork and juxtacanilicular tissue together provide the majority of resistance to the outflow of aqueous and, as such, are logical targets for surgical removal in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. In addition, minimal amounts of tissue are altered and existing physiologic outflow pathways are utilized. Trabecular bypass surgery has the potential for much lower risks of choroidal hemorrhage, infection and uses existing physiologic outflow mechanisms. This surgery could be performed under topical anesthesia in a physician's office with rapid visual recovery.
Therefore, there is a great clinical need for the treatment of glaucoma by a method that would be faster, safer and less expensive than currently available modalities. Trabecular bypass surgery is an innovative surgery that uses a micro stent, shunt, or other implant to bypass diseased trabecular meshwork alone at the level of trabecular meshwork and use or restore existing outflow pathways. The object of the present invention is to provide a means and methods for treating elevated intraocular pressure in a manner which is simple, effective, disease site specific and can be performed on an outpatient basis.
Some aspects of the invention comprise an implant for treating glaucoma, the implant comprising: a first portion configured to be embedded in the sclera of an eye, to anchor the implant; a second portion configured to be positioned in the anterior chamber of the eye and to receive fluid from the anterior chamber; an intermediate portion between the first portion and the second portion, the intermediate portion configured to span the trabecular meshwork of the eye, so as to permit drainage of fluid between the anterior chamber and Schlemm's canal; and a plurality of longitudinally spaced openings in the intermediate portion.
Some aspects of the invention comprise an implant for treating glaucoma in an eye, the implant having a longitudinal implant axis, and comprising: an outflow portion through which the longitudinal implant axis passes, the outflow portion shaped and sized to be: (a) introduced through Schlemm's canal of the eye with the portion of the longitudinal implant axis at an angle to Schlemm's canal; and (b) received at least partially within Schlemm's canal regardless of a rotational orientation of the outflow portion about the longitudinal implant axis during the introduction; a plurality of openings in the outflow portion, the openings allowing fluid to communicate from a lumen within the outflow portion to a location outside the outflow portion; an inflow portion configured to permit communication of fluid from the anterior chamber of the eye to the outflow portion; and an anchoring member at one end of the implant.
Some aspects of the invention comprise an implant for treating glaucoma, comprising: an outflow portion, sized and shaped to be received at least partially within Schlemm's canal; an inflow portion in fluid communication with the outflow portion, the inflow portion configured to be disposed in the anterior chamber of the eye; and a central portion extending between the inflow and outflow portions; the outflow portion having a diameter that is no more than three times the diameter of the central portion; a plurality of openings in the outflow portion, the openings allowing fluid to communicate from a lumen within the outflow portion to a location outside the outflow portion; and an anchoring member at one end of the implant, the anchoring member configured to anchor the implant in the sclera of the eye.
In some embodiments, the implant further comprises at least one opening in the central portion.
Some aspects of the invention comprise a kit for delivering implants for treating an ophthalmic condition, the kit comprising: an elongate body, the elongate body sized to be introduced into an eye through an incision in the eye; an implant positionable on or in the elongate body, the implant comprising: an outflow portion, sized and shaped to be received at least partially within Schlemm's canal; an inflow portion in fluid communication with the outflow portion, the inflow portion configured to be disposed in the anterior chamber of the eye; a plurality of openings in the outflow portion, the openings allowing fluid to communicate from a lumen within the outflow portion to a location outside the outflow portion; and an anchoring member at one end of the implant, the anchoring member configured to anchor the implant in the sclera of the eye.
In some embodiments, the elongate body in the kit comprises a tube, and the implant is positionable at least partially in the tube.
Some embodiments comprise method of treating glaucoma, the method comprising: inserting an elongate body into the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal of an eye, the elongate body comprising a plurality of fluid channels and a plurality of openings, each of the openings permitting fluid to flow from at least one of the channels through the opening to a location outside the elongate body; and introducing fluid through at least two of the fluid channels into the eye.
Some embodiments further comprise positioning the implant such that a first opening of said plurality of openings is at Schlemm's canal of the eye. Some embodiments further comprise positioning the implant such that a second opening of said plurality of openings is at the trabecular meshwork and/or the sclera of the eye.
In some embodiments, the inserting comprises inserting the elongate body from the anterior chamber through the trabecular meshwork of the eye and into Schlemm's canal of the eye.
Some embodiments include implanting a trabecular stent in an eye to reduce intraocular pressure, wherein the trabecular stent drains aqueous from the anterior chamber by bypassing diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and use existing outflow pathways.
Additional objects and features of the present invention will become more apparent and the invention itself will be best understood from the following Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments, when read with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In accordance with a preferred method, trabecular bypass surgery creates an opening or a hole through the diseased trabecular meshwork through minor microsurgery. To prevent “filling in” of the hole, a biocompatible elongate implant is placed within the hole as a trabecular stent, which may include, for example, a solid rod or hollow tube. In one exemplary embodiment, the trabecular stent implant may be positioned across the diseased trabecular meshwork alone and it does not extend into the eye wall or sclera. In another embodiment, the inlet end of the implant is exposed to the anterior chamber of the eye while the outlet end is positioned at the exterior surface of the trabecular meshwork. In another exemplary embodiment, the outlet end is positioned at and over the exterior surface of the trabecular meshwork and into the fluid collection channels of the existing outflow pathways. In still another embodiment, the outlet end is positioned in the Schlemm's canal. In an alternative embodiment, the outlet end enters into fluid collection channels up to the level of the aqueous veins with the trabecular stent inserted in a retrograde or antegrade fashion.
According to some embodiments, the trabecular stent implant is made of biocompatible material, which is either hollow to allow the flow of aqueous humor or solid biocompatible material that imbibes aqueous. The material for the trabecular stent may be selected from the group consisting of porous material, semi-rigid material, soft material, hydrophilic material, hydrophobic material, hydrogel, elastic material, and the like.
In further accordance with some embodiments, the trabecular stent implant may be rigid or it may be made of relatively soft material and is somewhat curved at its distal section to fit into the existing physiological outflow pathways, such as Schlemm's canal. The distal section inside the outflow pathways may have an oval shape to stabilize the trabecular stent in place without undue suturing. Stabilization or retention of the trabecular stent may be further strengthened by a taper end and/or by at least one ridge or rib on the exterior surface of the distal section of the trabecular stent, or other surface alterations designed to retain the trabecular stent.
In one embodiment, the trabecular stent may include a micropump, pressure sensor, one-way valve, or semi-permeable membrane to minimize reflux of red blood cells or serum protein. It may also be useful to use a biocompatible material that hydrates and expands after implantation so that the trabecular stent is locked into position around the trabecular meshwork opening or around the distal section of the trabecular stent.
One of the advantages of trabecular bypass surgery, as disclosed herein, and the use of a trabecular stent implant to bypass diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and thereby use existing outflow pathways is that the treatment of glaucoma is substantially simpler than in existing therapies. A further advantage of the invention is the utilization of simple microsurgery that may be performed on an outpatient basis with rapid visual recovery and greatly decreased morbidity. Finally, a distinctly different approach is used than is found in existing implants. Physiological outflow mechanisms are used or re-established by the implant of the present invention, in contradistinction with previously disclosed methodologies. The procedure for implanting a trabecular stent of the present invention may be accomplished by ab interno and/or ab externo procedures.
For background illustration,
The anterior chamber 20 of the eye 10, which is bound anteriorly by the cornea 12 and posteriorly by the iris 13 and lens 26, is filled with aqueous. Aqueous is produced primarily by the ciliary body 16 and reaches the anterior chamber angle 25 formed between the iris 13 and the cornea 12 through the pupil 14. In a normal eye, the aqueous is removed through the trabecular meshwork 21. Aqueous passes through trabecular meshwork 21 into Schlemm's canal 22 and through the aqueous veins 23, which merge with blood-carrying veins, and into venous circulation. Intraocular pressure of the eye 10 is maintained by the intricate balance of secretion and outflow of the aqueous in the manner described above. Glaucoma is characterized by the excessive buildup of aqueous fluid in the anterior chamber 20, which produces an increase in intraocular pressure (fluids are relatively incompressible and pressure is directed equally to all areas of the eye).
As shown in
Some embodiments include a method for increasing aqueous humor outflow in an eye of a patient to reduce the intraocular pressure therein. The method comprises bypassing diseased trabecular meshwork at a level of the trabecular meshwork with a trabecular stent implant and using existing outflow pathways. The trabecular stent implant may be an elongate trabecular stent or other appropriate shape, size, or configuration. In one embodiment of an elongate trabecular stent implant, the trabecular stent has an inlet end, an outlet end and a lumen therebetween, wherein the inlet end is positioned at an anterior chamber of the eye and the outlet end is positioned at about an exterior surface of the diseased trabecular meshwork. Furthermore, the outlet end may be positioned into fluid collection channels of the existing outflow pathways. Optionally, the existing outflow pathways may comprise Schlemm's canal 22. The outlet end may be further positioned into fluid collection channels up to the level of the aqueous veins with the trabecular stent inserted either in a retrograde or antegrade fashion with respect to the existing outflow pathways.
In a further alternate embodiment, a method is disclosed for increasing aqueous humor outflow in an eye of a patient to reduce an intraocular pressure therein. The method comprises (a) creating an opening in trabecular meshwork, wherein the trabecular meshwork comprises an interior side and exterior side; (b) inserting a trabecular stent implant into the opening; and (c) transporting the aqueous humor by the trabecular stent implant to bypass the trabecular meshwork at the level of the trabecular meshwork from the interior side to the exterior side of the trabecular meshwork.
The trabecular stent implant may comprise a biocompatible material, such as a medical grade silicone, for example, the material sold under the trademark Silastic™, which is available from Dow Corning Corporation of Midland, Mich., or polyurethane, which is sold under the trademark Pellethane™, which is also available from Dow Corning Corporation. In an alternate embodiment, other biocompatible materials (biomaterials) may be used, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrolidone, collagen, heparinized collagen, tetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated polymer, fluorinated elastomer, flexible fused silica, polyolefin, polyester, titanium, stainless steel, Nitinol, shape-memory material, polysilicon, mixture of biocompatible materials, and the like. In a further alternate embodiment, a composite biocompatible material by surface coating the above-mentioned biomaterial may be used, wherein the coating material may be selected from the group consisting of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyimide, hydrogel, heparin, therapeutic drugs, and the like.
In another aspect, the delivery system may comprise a retainer ring on the tubing 35, wherein the retainer ring is attached to a triggering mechanism in the handle and is used to pull back the outer sleeve (or the tubing 35) with an economical construction or manufacturing method.
Other aspects of the present invention may comprise sending irrigation fluid, including viscoelastic, down the center a stent delivery system. It is further disclosed that light means may be sent down a clear pathway or through a clear extrusion for better visualization, using the extrusion itself for light transmission. It is another object of the present disclosure to provide fiber optic imaging to validate placement of a stent in the target location, say Schlemm's canal. In another aspect, it is provided to using collet style mechanism to grip or grasp a stent during a delivery phase or to retrieve objects in the cavity of a body. It is also a common practice to use footswitch to release a stent in the body.
Some aspects of the invention relate to a trabecular stent comprising a distal end, a proximal end, and a plurality of outlet openings spaced apart axially, wherein the proximal end is placed in an anterior chamber and the distal end is placed in a sclera posterior to Schlemm's canal, at least one opening being exposed to Schlemm's canal.
In still another aspect of the present disclosure, RF energy or other suitable energy (thermal, cryo, or laser) is used to release a stent from its grasping tip. In a previously disclosed bifurcatable stent, the stent may be sized and configured to have at least one retaining arm at the end section of the stent body that is about perpendicular to the stent body, wherein a first retaining arm is used to be placed inside Schlemm's canal.
Some aspects of the invention relate to a stent delivery apparatus comprising a plurality of fluid exiting ports configured axially along a distal section of the apparatus, wherein each port is connected to a fluid supply, at least one fluid exiting port is exposed to a sclera to provide a fluid to the sclera. In one embodiment, the fluid is selected from a group consisting of genes, growth factors, drugs, nutrients, and combination thereof for treating the sclera. In another embodiment, the stent delivery apparatus further comprises a second fluid exiting port being in fluid communication with Schlemm's canal, wherein the fluid is selected from a group consisting of genes, growth factors, drugs, anti-glaucoma drug, anti-inflammatory drugs, vasodilating drugs, nutrients, and combination thereof for treating the sclera.
From the foregoing description, it should be appreciated that a novel approach for the surgical treatment of glaucoma has been disclosed for reducing intraocular pressure. While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those who are skilled in the art, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, as described by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/412,637, filed Sep. 21, 2002, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4168697 | Cantekin | Sep 1979 | A |
4175563 | Arenberg et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4402681 | Haas et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428746 | Mendez | Jan 1984 | A |
4501274 | Skjaerpe | Feb 1985 | A |
4521210 | Wong | Jun 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4632842 | Karwoski et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634418 | Binder | Jan 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4787885 | Binder | Nov 1988 | A |
4804382 | Turina et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4820626 | Williams et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846172 | Berlin | Jul 1989 | A |
4863457 | Lee | Sep 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4900300 | Lee | Feb 1990 | A |
4936825 | Ungerleider | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5073163 | Lippman | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5095887 | Leon et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127901 | Odrich | Jul 1992 | A |
5129895 | Vassiliadis et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5171213 | Price, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5246451 | Trescony et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318513 | Leib et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334137 | Freeman | Aug 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346464 | Camras | Sep 1994 | A |
5360399 | Stegmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5370641 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5454796 | Krupin | Oct 1995 | A |
5472440 | Beckman | Dec 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486165 | Stegmann | Jan 1996 | A |
5516522 | Peyman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520631 | Nordquist et al. | May 1996 | A |
5557453 | Schalz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558630 | Fisher | Sep 1996 | A |
5562641 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
RE35390 | Smith | Dec 1996 | E |
5601094 | Reiss | Feb 1997 | A |
5601549 | Miyagi | Feb 1997 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5626559 | Solomon | May 1997 | A |
5639278 | Dereume et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651783 | Reynard | Jul 1997 | A |
5665114 | Weadock et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676679 | Simon et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681275 | Ahmed | Oct 1997 | A |
5702414 | Richter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702419 | Berry et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713844 | Peyman | Feb 1998 | A |
5723005 | Herrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5741333 | Frid | Apr 1998 | A |
5743868 | Brown et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752928 | De Roulhac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766243 | Christensen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785674 | Mateen | Jul 1998 | A |
5807302 | Wandel | Sep 1998 | A |
5810870 | Myers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830139 | Abreu | Nov 1998 | A |
5830171 | Wallace | Nov 1998 | A |
5836939 | Negus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5865831 | Cozean et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879319 | Pynson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882327 | Jacob | Mar 1999 | A |
5886822 | Spitzer | Mar 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908449 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932299 | Katoot | Aug 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5981598 | Tatton | Nov 1999 | A |
6004302 | Brierley | Dec 1999 | A |
6007510 | Nigam | Dec 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6033434 | Borghi | Mar 2000 | A |
6045557 | White et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6059772 | Hsia et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059812 | Clerc et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063116 | Kelleher | May 2000 | A |
6063396 | Kelleher | May 2000 | A |
6071286 | Mawad | Jun 2000 | A |
6077299 | Adelberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142990 | Burk | Nov 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168575 | Soltanpour | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174305 | Mikus et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187016 | Hedges et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193656 | Jeffries et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197056 | Schachar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203513 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228873 | Brandt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231597 | Deem et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241721 | Cozean et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254612 | Hieshima | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266182 | Morita | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268398 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6342058 | Portney | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375642 | Grieshaber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428501 | Reynard | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464724 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585680 | Bugge | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626858 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629981 | Bui et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6666841 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699211 | Savage | Mar 2004 | B2 |
D490152 | Myall et al. | May 2004 | S |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169130 | Tu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188308 | Tu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009124 | Lynch et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055372 | Lynch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069637 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088260 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097151 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120200 | Bergheim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030181848 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187385 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220602 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220603 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236484 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024345 | Gharib et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050392 | Tu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040102729 | Haffner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127843 | Tu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200072059 | Dec 2000 | AU |
2244646 | Aug 1998 | CA |
198 40 047 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0 858 788 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 898 947 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 114 627 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2 710 269 | Sep 1993 | FR |
2 296 663 | Jul 1996 | GB |
11-123205 | Jan 1999 | JP |
WO 9118568 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9413234 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9219294 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9421205 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9508310 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9830181 | Jan 1998 | WO |
EO 8900869 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9835639 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9926567 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9930641 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9938470 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0013627 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0064389 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0064390 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0064391 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0064393 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0072788 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0150943 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0178631 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178656 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03015659 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03073968 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60412637 | Sep 2002 | US |