This invention is directed to therapeutic methods and devices for the treatment of glaucoma. In particular, this invention is concerned with the use of a shunt or drain for the treatment of glaucoma. In another aspect this invention is concerned with ocular pressure spike shunts and use of the same in ocular surgery.
The glaucomas are a common group of blinding conditions usually associated with elevated intraocular pressure. This elevated pressure in the eye may be regarded as a disorder of the drainage system of the eye which gives rise to the glaucomas.
Aqueous humor of the eye (“aqueous”) is a flowing liquid fluid (composed of sodium, chloride, bicarb, amino acids, glucose, ascorbic acid, and water) that is actively secreted by the ciliary body and flows out past the iris into the anterior chamber (are between the lens/iris and the cornea). The aqueous drains out through angle formed by the iris and the sclera into a meshwork call the trabeculum, and from there into the canal of Schlemm and then into the episcleral veins. Uveosclera drainage also occurs. Normal intraocular pressure (IOP) of aqueous in anterior chamber is between 10 and 20 mm Hg. Prolonged IOPs of greater than 21 mm Hg are associated with damage to optic nerve fibers.
In some cases of glaucoma the cause can be found: the trabecular meshwork becomes blocked by pigment or membrane. In other cases, blockage is due to a closure of the angle between the iris and the cornea. This angle type of glaucoma is referred to as “angle-closure glaucoma”. In the majority of glaucoma cases, however, called “open angle glaucoma”, the cause is unknown.
Elevated intraocular pressure results in the death of retinal ganglion cells (which convey retinal information to the brain) resulting in a characteristic pattern of loss of the field of vision, progressing to tunnel vision and blindness if left untreated.
Treatment of glaucoma consists predominantly of methods to lower the intraocular pressure (pharmacological, trabecular meshwork laser and surgery to drain fluid from the eye). More recently protection of the retinal ganglion cells by neuroprotective agents has been attempted.
Although pharmacological treatments of glaucoma have improved, they have important implications for the patient's quality of life, have compliance issues which are important in the elderly (in whom glaucoma is prevalent), expose the patient of glaucoma to side effects, and over a lifetime are costly.
Surgery for glaucoma treatment is usually a trabeculectomy in which a fistula is created to drain fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space near the limbus, creating a bulge in the conjunctiva known as a bleb. Frequently scarring occurs and attempts to counter this with antimetabolites such as Mitomycin C have met with some success. In recalcitrant cases, glaucoma implants, drainage, shunt or valve devices have been developed e.g. Molteno (U.S. Pat. No. 4,457,757), Krupin (U.S. Pat. No. 5,454,746) and Baerveldt (U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,604). These suffer from similar problems of scarring (Classen L, Kivela T, Tarkkanen “A Histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of the filtration bleb after unsuccessful glaucoma seton implantation” Am J Ophthalmol, 1996;122:205-12) around the external opening of the tube devices in the subconjunctival space—the development of a large number of these devices is testament to the fact that many fail in the longer term. In these devices a drainage tube is located in the anterior chamber and is in fluid communication with the sclera or a surgically created subconjunctival space.
Whereas cataract surgery has been revolutionized in the last two decades, improvements in glaucoma surgery have been slower. Antifibrotic agents have improved the success rate of conventional filtration surgery (trabeculectomy), but with increased bleb leaks, blebitis, endophthalmitis and hypotensive maculopathy. Glaucoma shunts have had limited success in eyes that have “failed” multiple standard procedures. However complications with malpositioned tubes, erosion and strabismus persist. A considerable issue is the lack of reproducibility and predictability in achieving the desired target intraocular pressure (IOP). Final IOP is largely determined by healing which can be unpredictable—in view of vast biological variations, it is impossible to predict which eyes will rapidly scar causing failure and which will fail to heal resulting in prolonged post-operative hypotony. Scarring remains a significant problem in all these external drainage proposals, where aqueous drains into the conjunctiva, or surgical chambers in the sclera.
The introduction of a new class of antiglaucoma drugs, the prostaglandin analogues, has resulted in acknowledgment of the importance of the uveoscleral pathway in drainage of fluid form the eye (Hylton C, Robin A L “Update on prostaglandin analogs” Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2003;14:65-9). Uveoscleral flow where aqueous humor flows through the interstitium of the ciliary muscle into the suprachoroidal space (a potential space between the choroids and sclera) and out through the sclera into the connective tissue of the orbit may account for 54% of outflow young healthy humans (Toris C B, Yablonski M E, Wang Y L, Camras C B “Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye” Am J Ophthalmol, 1999;127:407-12).
Cyclodialysis, the separation of the ciliary body from the scleral spur and underlying sclera, creates free communication between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space and enhances uveoscleral flow. It has long been known that cyclodialysis can cause a profound reduction of intraocular pressure—initially (Fuchs E. “Detachment of the choroid inadvertently during cataract surgery” [German] von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol, 1900;51:199-224) cyclodialysis was recognized as a complication of cataract surgery. Deliberate creation of a cyclodialysis cleft for treating elevated intraocular pressure in uncontrolled glaucoma was first described as a surgical procedure in 1905 (Heine I. “Cyclodialysis, a new glaucoma operation” [German]) Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 1905;31:824-826). Since such clefts can heal and close spontaneously a number of devices have been used to keep them open, including platinum wire, horse hair, magnesium strips, tantalum foil, Supramid®, gelatin film, Teflon®, silicone and polymethylmethacrylate (Rosenberg L F, Krupin T. “Implants in glaucoma surgery” Chapter 88, The Glaucomas, Ritch R, Shields B M, Krupin T Eds. 2nd Edition Mosby St Louis 1986) and Hema (Mehta K R. “The suprachoroidal Hema wedge in glaucoma surgery” American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting 1977, pp 144). However the success rate of such approaches has been low (as low as 15%, Rosenburg & Krupin ibid and Gross R L, Feldman R M, Spaeth G L, et al “Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia” Ophthalmology, 1988;95:1195-201). Failure was due to uncontrolled low pressure (hypotony) with consequential macular edema, bleeding (hyphema) and inadequate pressure control.
The device and method of a first aspect of this invention takes advantage of the methods used in cataract surgery to develop a minimally invasive glaucoma procedure—thus small, self sealing incisions and materials that are biocompatible and foldable so that they fit through small openings will reduce surgical trauma and time. The controlled draining of aqueous into the suprachoroidal space according to this invention provides some predictability of outcome and overcomes scarring problems that have plagued glaucoma implants in the past.
The most frequent complication following modern cataract surgery with phacoemulsification, requiring specific treatment is elevated intraocular pressure (Cohen V M, Demetria H, Jordan K, Lamb R J, Vivian A J. :First day post-operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification” Eye, 1998;12 (Pt 4):634-6, and Dinakaran S, Desai S P, Raj PS. “Is the first post-operative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery?” Eye, 2000 Jun; 14 (Pt 3A):364-6). The increase may be marked and typically peaks at 5 to 7 hours before returning to near normal levels in 1 to 3 days (Hildebrand G D, Wickremasinghe S S, Tranos P G, Harris M L, Little B C. “Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification” J Cataract Refract Surg., 2003; 29:1087-92). Such pressure spikes can cause pain and may increase the risk of sight-threatening complications such as retinal vascular occlusion, increases loss of visual field in advanced glaucoma and ischemic optic neuropathy—effects in otherwise healthy eyes are unknown (Hildebrand G D et al, ibid).
A number of prophylactic treatments are used with limited success—these include intracameral carbachol or acetylcholine, topical timolol, dorzolamide, aproclonidine, latanoprost and systemic acetazolamide (see Hildebrand G D et al, ibid). This also exposes the patient to the risk of drug side effects, increased cost and it has been postulated that reducing the flow of aqueous humor post surgery prolongs the residence time of bacteria that frequently (46.3% of cases) contaminate the anterior chamber during surgery (Srinivasan R, Tiroumal S, Kanungo R, Natarajan M K. “Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification” J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002; 28:2173-6.). This may increase the risk of endophthalmitis one of the most devastating sequelae of intraocular surgery, since the bacteria are not being “flushed out” of the eye by the normal production of aqueous humour, the secretion of which has been suppressed by the drugs. Another technique is to decompress the anterior chamber by applying pressure to the posterior lip of the paracentesis wound at the appropriate time. This requires surveillance and could increase the risk of infection. Another aspect of this invention hereinafter described overcomes these problems.
According to the present invention there is provided a flexible ocular device for implantation into the eye formed of a biocompatible elastomeric material, foldable to a diameter of 1.5 mm or less, comprising a fluid drainage tube having at one end a foldable plate adapted to locate the device on the inner surface of the sclera in a suprachoroidal space formed by cyclodialysis, said drainage tube opening onto the disc at one end and opening to the anterior chamber when implanted into the eye at its other end, so as to provide aqueous pressure regulation.
Preferably the fluid drainage tube has a diameter selected to provide predetermined resistance to aqueous humor flow, for example a pressure of 10 mm Hg or less. Alternatively said tube contains a valve so as to regulate pressure of the aqueous chamber at a predetermined level, for example, at no less than 10 mm Hg.
In accordance with another embodiment of this invention there is provided a method for treating glaucoma which comprises:
providing a flexible ocular device formed of a biocompatible elastomeric material foldable to a diameter of 1.5 mm or less, comprising a fluid drainage tube having at one end a foldable plate adapted to locate the device on the inner surface of the sclera and at its other end being open so as to allow fluid communication through said tube;
forming a small self-sealing incision at the juncture of the cornea and sclera of the eye opening into the anterior chamber;
filling the anterior chamber with a viscoelastic substance;
introducing the foldable ocular device into a suprachoroidal space formed by cyclodialysis via a hollow cannula, wherein said plate locates the device on the inner surface of the sclera in the suprachoroidal space, and said drainage tube is located in the anterior chamber of the eye so as to provide aqueous humor pressure regulation; and
thereafter removing said cannula and viscoelastic material from the eye.
In another aspect there is provided an ocular pressure spike shunt for insertion into an ocular paracentesis incision port following ocular surgery, comprising a flexible fluid transfer tube formed of biocompatible material, preferably biocompatible elastomeric material, so as to allow paracentesis incision closure around said tube, having an inner end and an outer end, a tubular lumen disposed between said inner end and said outer end to allow fluid communication through said tube, said lumen containing a valve for controlling pressure in the eye following ocular surgery, which valve opens permitting fluid flow through said tube when a predetermined pressure is exceeded, said shunt being configured such that on insertion into a paracentesis port said outer end is substantially flush with the surface of the cornea, and said inner end opens into the anterior chamber of the eye.
In another aspect there is provided a method for preventing ocular pressure spikes following ocular surgery wherein a paracentesis incision port is formed in the eye during said surgery, comprising introducing an ocular pressure spike shunt into said paracentesis port at the conclusion of ocular surgery, said shunt comprising a flexible fluid transfer tube formed of biocompatible material, preferably biocompatible elastomeric material, so as to allow paracentesis incision closure around said tube, having an inner end and an outer end, a tubular lumen disposed between said inner end and said outer end to allow fluid communication through said tube, said lumen containing a valve for controlling pressure in the eye following ocular surgery, which valve opens permitting fluid flow through said tube when a predetermined pressure is exceeded, said shunt being configured such that on insertion into a paracentesis port said outer end is substantially flush with the surface of the cornea, and said inner end protrudes into the anterior chamber of the eye.
The ocular device according to the present invention is implanted in a patient's eye using minimally invasive surgery techniques, adopted from modern cataract surgery.
The ocular device is formed from a biocompatible elastomeric material. Preferably, the device is made of soft surgical grade polymeric material, such as silicon or acrylic material such that the device is foldable and may be rolled up for insertion via a cannula.
Sutures are not required to hold the device in place once surgically introduced into the eye, as the foldable plate is adapted to locate the device on the inner surface of the sclera in a suprachoroidal space formed by cyclodialysis (
The diameter of the tube may be selected so as to provide a resistance to aqueous humor flow of predetermined pressure, preferably being a pressure less than 10 mm Hg. This enables the pressure of the aqueous to be regulated in a controlled manner, providing relief from excess ocular pressure associated with glaucoma, with avoidance of hypotony (uncontrolled low pressure). Alternatively, the tube may contain a valve, for example disposed at the end of the tube opening onto the disc so as to regulate ocular pressure at a predetermined level. Preferably, the valve prevents aqueous flow through the tube at a pressure of less than 10 mm Hg. Examples of valves which may be used include a slit valve. The drainage stops altogether if the pressure drops to a predetermined threshold level controlled by the valve.
The flexible foldable nature of the device according to the present invention enables well established techniques used in cataract surgery to be employed in the treatment of glaucoma. The device according to the present invention may be folded into a cannula and introduced for location into the eye.
Intraocular surgery techniques allow a paracentesis (opening onto the anterior chamber from without at the juncture of the cornea and sclera—the limbus) to be performed and the anterior chamber filled with viscoelastic substance. A cyclodialysis instrument is introduced via the paracentesis, with the paracentesis preferably being carried out 180° from the insertion site. A cyclodialysis is carried out, for example by advancing an instrument tip into the angle between the ciliary body and sclera so as to create a cyclodialysis. This is preferably carried out with direct visualisation via gonioscopy lens viewed through an operating microscope. A surgical gonioscopy lens is preferably placed on the cornea while the cyclodialysis is carried out.
The rolled up ocular device is introduced through a cannula, for example using an introducer such as used in cataract surgery or other ocular surgery, from which the device can be detached by pressing a plunger into the introducer when the device has been inserted into the suprachoroidal space created by the cyclodialysis. The tubing of the device is positioned into the interior chamber, and the plate unfolds in the suprachoroidal space to locate the device in the eye. Because of its size, the device cannot fall through the opening through which it was introduced into the suprachoroidal space by the cyclodialysis. The plate therefore keeps the tube in the appropriate position in the anterior chamber allowing controlled aqueous drainage and providing an effective treatment for elevated ocular pressure.
The pressure spike shunt is designed to fit snugly in a paracentesis port that is routinely made during cataract or other ocular surgery. The tubing will not distort the port and there will be no leakage around the port. The outer end of the tube will sit flush on the surface of the cornea—the inner aspect of the tube will preferably just protrude into the anterior chamber—tube length will generally be 1-2 mm and tube diameter is preferably from 0.4-1.2 mm. The tube will contain the same valvular device as contained in the ocular device described above and will open when the intraocular pressure exceeds a predetermined level, preferably 10 mm Hg. At normal ocular pressure the valve will be closed, closing said tube to any fluid communication.
The shunt may be inserted into a paracentesis port, or one or more ports, using, for example, a punctum plug inserting instrument such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,292.
This invention will now be described with reference to the following examples.
Fresh whole porcine eyes were taken and mounted in a temperature controlled)(37°) perfusion chamber. The eyes were perfused with Balanced Salt Solution via a 30 gauge needle inserted via a paracentesis into the anterior chamber. A peristaltic pump was used at a flow rate of 2 μl/min. Intraocular pressure was continuously monitored via a second paracentesis.
Typically intraocular pressures stabilized at 10-15 mm Hg and fell with time (the “washout effect”, as glycosan aminoglycans are washed out of the trabecular meshwork with time). Creation of a cyclodialysis (initially with a small spatula, then viscoelastic injection to enlarge the area of detachment of the ciliary body from the sclera) with or without insertion of the device in the cyclodialysis cleft (silicone tubing, length 3 mm, external diameter—1 mm, plate diameter 3 mm) resulted in lower intraocular pressures (below 10 mm Hg) on reperfusion at the same perfusion rate as control eyes.
Adequate anesthesia is provided to the eye of a glaucoma patient prepared for intraocular surgery. A paracentesis (opening into anterior chamber from without at the junction of the cornea and sclera—the limbus) is performed and the anterior chamber is filled with a viscoelastic substance. A surgical gonioscopy lens is placed on the cornea (or anterior segment endoscope is used) and a cyclodialysis instrument is introduced via the paracentesis—the paracentesis is carried out 180° away from the planned implant insertion site. The cyclodialysis instrument tip is advanced into the angle and pushed into the space between the ciliary body and sclera creating a cyclodialysis—this is carried out with direct visualization via the gonioscopy lens viewed through an operating microscope. In order to minimize bleeding, the area in the angle (anterior ciliary body face and overlying trabecular meshwork) can be lasered either preoperatively or at the time of surgery to ablate surface blood vessels).
Through an opening at the tip of the cyclodialysis instrument viscoelastic is inserted to further create a space in the suprachoroidal space. The implant is then introduced—the device is rolled up in the same manner as an ultrathin intraocular lens. The ocular device is attached to an introducer from which it is detached by pushing a plunger in the introducer when the implant is inserted into the suprachoroidal space created by the cyclodialysis instrument and viscoelastic. The tubing is then positioned into the anterior chamber and may be cut to size. The plate unfolds in the suprachoroidal space and because of its size cannot fall through the opening through which it was introduced into the suprachoroidal space. The plate therefore keeps the tube in an appropriate position. The valve is then flushed (with a cannula inserted via the paracentesis) via the tube opening in the anterior chamber. Viscoelastic is then removed from the anterior chamber and antibiotics, steroids and a dressing applied to the eye.
Fresh whole porcine eyes were taken and mounted in a temperature-controlled (37°) perfusion chamber as in Example 1. The eyes were perfused with Balanced Salt Solution via a 30 gauge needle inserted via a paracentesis into the anterior chamber. A peristaltic pump was used at a flow rate of 2 μl/min. Intraocular pressure was continuously monitored via a second paracentesis.
Typically intraocular pressures stabilized at 10-15 mm Hg and fell with time (the “washout effect, as glycoaminoglycans are washed out of the trabecular meshwork with time). Silicone tubing (length 3 mm, external diameter 1 mm) was introduced into one paracentesis port. One end of the port (outer end) was flush with the cornea and the inner end of the port extended slightly into the anterior chamber. Intraocular pressure did not exceed 10 mm Hg.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/905,003, filed Oct. 14, 2010, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/615,642, filed Dec. 22, 2006, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,128,588, issued Mar. 6, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/712,277, filed Nov. 14, 2003, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,291,125, issued Nov. 6, 2007. This application also is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/579,330, filed Nov. 12, 2004, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,486,000, issued Jul. 16, 2013; and to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/615,615, Dec. 22, 2006, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,850,638, issued Dec. 14, 2010; and to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/107,676, filed on Apr. 22, 2008, entitled “OCULAR PRESSURE REGULATION” by Minas Coroneo, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,815,592, issued Oct. 19, 2010. Where permitted, the subject matter of each of the above noted applications is incorporated by reference in its entirety by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2990670 | Kingsbury | Jul 1961 | A |
3439675 | Cohen | Apr 1969 | A |
3767759 | Wichterle | Oct 1973 | A |
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3915172 | Wichterle et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4402681 | Haas et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4521210 | Wong | Jun 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4617715 | Koistinen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4634418 | Binder | Jan 1987 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4787885 | Binder | Nov 1988 | A |
4826478 | Schocket | May 1989 | A |
4846172 | Berlin | Jul 1989 | A |
4863457 | Lee | Sep 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4900300 | Lee | Feb 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5071408 | Ahmed | Dec 1991 | A |
5073163 | Lippman | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127901 | Odrich | Jul 1992 | A |
5171213 | Price, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5284476 | Koch | Feb 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342370 | Simon et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346464 | Camras | Sep 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423777 | Tajiri et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454746 | Guegan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558630 | Fisher | Sep 1996 | A |
RE35390 | Smith | Dec 1996 | E |
5601094 | Reiss | Feb 1997 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5626559 | Solomon | May 1997 | A |
5651782 | Simon et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5676944 | Alvarado et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702414 | Richter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713844 | Peyman | Feb 1998 | A |
5741292 | Mendius | Apr 1998 | A |
5743868 | Brown et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749879 | Middleman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752928 | de Roulhac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5792075 | Schwager | Aug 1998 | A |
5807244 | Barot | Sep 1998 | A |
5807302 | Wandel | Sep 1998 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882327 | Jacob | Mar 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5941250 | Aramant et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007510 | Nigam | Dec 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6019786 | Thompson | Feb 2000 | A |
6036678 | Giungo | Mar 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6050999 | Paraschac et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077299 | Adelberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142969 | Nigam | Nov 2000 | A |
6152918 | Padilla et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174307 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186974 | Allan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203513 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221078 | Bylsma | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6251090 | Avery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264668 | Prywes | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270472 | Antaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331313 | Wong et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375642 | Grieshaber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383219 | Telandro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464724 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471666 | Odrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471777 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494857 | Neuhann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508779 | Suson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510600 | Yaron et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537568 | Olejnik et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544208 | Ethier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558342 | Yaron et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6561974 | Grieshaber et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579256 | Hughes | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589203 | Mitrev | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595945 | Brown | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626858 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648283 | Chase et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666841 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676607 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699210 | Williams et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699211 | Savage | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719750 | Varner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726664 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730056 | Ghaem et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741666 | Henry et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6752753 | Hoskins et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783544 | Lynch et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786888 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6827699 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827700 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881197 | Nigam | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6881198 | Brown | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6939298 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955656 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962573 | Wilcox | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6966888 | Cullen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969384 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981958 | Gharib et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6989007 | Shadduck | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7041077 | Shields | May 2006 | B2 |
7090681 | Weber et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094225 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7135009 | Tu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160264 | Lisk, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163543 | Smedley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186232 | Smedley et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7192412 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7195774 | Carvalho et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7207965 | Simon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220238 | Lynch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273475 | Tu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291125 | Coroneo | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297130 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431710 | Tu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7488303 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7563241 | Tu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7850637 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857782 | Tu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7972616 | Dubrow et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8075511 | Tu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8128588 | Coroneo | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8702727 | Harrington et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20010000527 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010025150 | de Juan et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013572 | Berlin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026200 | Savage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020072673 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087111 | Ethier et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111608 | Baerveldt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128613 | Nakayama | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165478 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169130 | Tu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169468 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177856 | Richter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188308 | Tu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193725 | Odrich | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193804 | Tickle | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009124 | Lynch et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028127 | Balzum et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028228 | Sand | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055372 | Lynch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069637 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088260 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097151 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097171 | Elliott | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109883 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120200 | Bergheim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135149 | Cullen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181848 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187385 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191428 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208163 | Yaron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220602 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220603 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232015 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236484 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015140 | Shields | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024345 | Gharib et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050392 | Tu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073156 | Brown | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088048 | Richter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092856 | Dahan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097984 | Zapata | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102729 | Haffner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127843 | Tu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147870 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148022 | Eggleston | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193095 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193262 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210181 | Vass et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210185 | Tu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216749 | Tu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225250 | Yablonski | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236343 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249333 | Bergheim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254517 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254519 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254521 | Simon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260227 | Lisk et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260228 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008673 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038334 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085892 | Goto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090806 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090807 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107734 | Coroneo | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119601 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2005 | A9 |
20050119636 | Haffner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119737 | Bene et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125003 | Pinchuk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143817 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149080 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175663 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181011 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181977 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182350 | Nigam | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191331 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192527 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197613 | Sniegowski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209549 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209550 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232972 | Odrich | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244462 | Farooq | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250788 | Tu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266047 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267397 | Bhalla | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267398 | Protopsaltis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273033 | Grahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277864 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283108 | Savage | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288617 | Yaron et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288619 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020248 | Prescott | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032507 | Tu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036207 | Koonmen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047263 | Tu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069340 | Simon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074375 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084907 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116626 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149194 | Conston et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155238 | Shields | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173397 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195055 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195056 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235367 | Takashima et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241580 | Mittelstein et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241749 | Tu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060276739 | Brown | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010827 | Tu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070088424 | Greenberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088432 | Solovay et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112292 | Tu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118147 | Smedley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070276315 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276316 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282244 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282245 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293807 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015488 | Tu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045878 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080108933 | Yu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080200860 | Tu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234624 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2008 | A2 |
20090036819 | Tu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036840 | Viray et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100010416 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100152641 | Yablonski | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100234790 | Tu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274259 | Yaron et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110028884 | Coroneo | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087149 | Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087150 | Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087151 | Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120123316 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220917 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130245532 | Tu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130281817 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281908 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281910 | Tu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012279 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066831 | Silvestrini et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081195 | Clauson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107556 | Silvestrini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135916 | Clauson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140213958 | Clauson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140309599 | Schaller | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323995 | Clauson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364789 | Schaller | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378886 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022780 | John et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150223982 | Yablonski | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238360 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150320596 | Gifford, III et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335487 | de Juan, Jr. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1225027 | Aug 1999 | CN |
1285724 | Feb 2001 | CN |
1124164 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1681457 | Oct 2005 | CN |
0 228 185 | Nov 1986 | EP |
1184010 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1310222 | May 2003 | EP |
1473004 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1477146 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1418868 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1977724 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2027837 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2101891 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2018289 | Aug 1994 | RU |
2056818 | Mar 1996 | RU |
2074686 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2074687 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2157678 | Oct 2000 | RU |
WO-8900869 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO-9112046 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO-9219294 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9402081 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-9409721 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9409837 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9413234 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO-9508310 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO-9620742 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-9636377 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9823237 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9830181 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9926567 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-0006223 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0064389 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064390 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064391 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064393 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064511 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0178631 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0178656 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0197727 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0236052 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02070045 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02074052 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02080811 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02080829 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02087418 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02087479 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02089699 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02102274 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03015659 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03015667 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03041622 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03073968 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03099175 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004014218 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2004026106 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004026347 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043231 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004056294 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004060219 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004062469 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004073552 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004110391 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005016418 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005046782 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005055873 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005105197 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107664 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107845 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006012421 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006036715 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2007087061 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007115259 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130393 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008061043 | May 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2013069617 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Barsky et al. “Evaluation of absorbable gelatin film (Gelfilm) in cyclodialysis clefts” Arch. Ophth. 60(6): 1044/1052,1958. |
Bick M.W., “Use of tantalum for ocular drainage” Arch Ophthal. Oct. 1949; 42(4): 373/88. |
Bietti, G., “The present state of the use of plastics in eye surgery” Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1955; 33(4):337/70. |
Brown et al., “Internal Sclerectomy for Glaucoma Filtering Surgery with an Automated Trephine,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 105, Jan. 1987. |
Burchfield JC, Kass MA, Wax MB. Primary valve malfunction of the Krupin eye valve with disk. J Glaucoma. Jun. 1997;6(3):152/6. |
Chiou et al. “Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyes undergoing deep sclerectomy with collagen implant” Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996), pp. 541-544. |
Chylack LT, Bellows AR. Molecular sieving in suprachoroidal fluid formation in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 420, 1978. |
Classen et al., “A histopathologic and immunohistorchemical analysis of the filtration bleb after unsuccessful glaucoma seton implantation” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 122:205/12 (1996). |
Cohen et al., “First day post/operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification” Eye 12(4):634/6 (1998). |
Collaborative Normal/Tension Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal/tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487/97. |
Coote. “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters—A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results.” J. Glaucoma. vol. 8 No. 1 Supplement (1999):p. S4. |
Cullen, et al. “Anterior Chamber of Frontal Sinus Shunt for the Diversion of Aqueous Humor: A Pilot Study in Four Normal Dogs”. Veterinary Ophthalmology. vol. 1. No. 1. (1998):31-39. |
Demailly et al. “Non/penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with or without collagen device (CD) in primary open/angle glaucoma: middle/term retrospective study” International Ophthalmology 20: 131/140, 1997. |
Derwent English abstract for EP 1184010, published Mar. 6, 2002 entitled: “Drainage unit for an eye, consists of a hollow line, a distribution member, and a pressure relief valve which only allows water to leave the eye chamber above a certain pressure,” Accession Nbr. 12409716 [351]. |
Dinakaran et al., “Is the first post/operative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery?” Eye, 14(3A):364/6 (2000). |
Draeger “Chirurgische Maβnahmen bei kongenitalem Glaukom” (Surgical Interventions in Congenital Glaucoma) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 202(5): 425/427 [Article in German with English summary included]. |
Einmahl et al., “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:1533/1539 (2002). |
Ellis, RA “A Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Using Plastics in Surgery” Am J Ophth. 50; 1960, 733/742. |
Emi et al., “Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space” Invest. Ophthal. Visual Sci. 30(2):233/238 (1989). |
Fanous MM, Cohn RA. Propionibacterium endophthalmitis following Molteno tube repositioning. J Glaucoma. Aug. 1997;6(4):201/2. |
Fuchs E., “Detachment of the choroid inadvertently during cataract surgery” [German] von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol, 51:199/224 (1900) [Article in German with English summary]. |
Gills et al., “Action of cyclodialysis utilizing an implant studied by manometry in a human eye” Expl Eye Res 1967; 6:75/78. |
Gills JP, “Cyclodialysis implants” South Med J. 1967 60(7):692/5. |
Gills, “Cyclodialysis Implants in Human Eyes” Am J Ophth 61:1966,841/846. |
Goldberg “Management of Uncontrolled Glaucoma With the Molteno System” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1987; 15: 97/107. |
Gordon MO, Kass. MA, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999:573/83. |
Grant, W.M. , MD, Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork, A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmololgy, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533. |
Gross et al., “Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia” Ophthalmology, 95:1195/201 (1988). |
Harper SL, Foster CS. Intraocular lens explantation in uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000 Winter; 40(1):107/16. |
Harrington “Cataract and glaucoma. Management of the coexistent conditions and a description of a new operation combining lens extraction with reverse cyclodialysis.” Am J Ophthalmol. May 1966;61(5 Pt 2):1134/40. |
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268/79. |
Heine I., “Cyclodialysis, a new glaucoma operation” Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 31:824/826 (1905) [Article in German with English summary included]. |
Hildebrand et al., “Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification” J. Catact Refract Surg., 29:1087/92 (2003). |
Hoskins, et al., “Aqueous Humor Outflow”, Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pp. 41-66, 1989. |
Howorth DJ, “Feasibility study for a micromachined glaucoma drainage device” Cranfield University School of industrial and manufacturing science MSc Thesis Academic Year 2001/2002 Sep. 13, 2002. |
Hylton et al., “Update on prostaglandin analogs” Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 14:65/9 (2003). |
Javitt JC, Chiang YP. Preparing for managed competition. Utilization of ambulatory eye care visits to ophthalmologists. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1034/5. |
Jay JL, Allan D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open/angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye 1989; 3:528/35. |
Jordan J., “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma” J. Glaucoma 2006; 15:200/205. |
Karlen, M. et al., “Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results” Br. J. Ophthalmol, Jan. 1999, 83(1):6/11. |
Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular HypertensionTreatment Study. A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open/angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701/13. |
Klemm et al. “Die Ultraschallbiomikroskopie als Kriterium der Funktionsprüfung des suprachorioidalen Spaltes nach kammerwinkelchirurgischen Eingriffen (Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging for Assessment of the Suprachoroidal Cleft after Angle Surgery)” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1997; 210: 74/77. |
Klemm et al., “Experimental use of space/retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results” Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Sep. 1995;233(9):592/7. |
Kozlov et al., “Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen” Eye microsurgery 3:44/46 (1990) [Article in Russian with English translation included]. |
Krejci, L., “Cyclodialysis with hydroxymethyl methacrylate capillary strip (HCS). Animal experiments with a new approach in glaucoma drainage surgery” Ophthalmologica 1972; 164(2):113/21. |
Krejcí L. “Microdrainage of anterior chamber of eye glaucoma operation using hydron capillary drain.” Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 1974;(61):1/90. |
Kupfer “Studies on intraocular pressure. I. A technique for polyethylene tube implantation into the anterior chamber of the rabbit.” Arch Ophthalmol. Apr. 1961;65:565/70. |
La Rocca “Gonioplasty in Glaucoma*A Preliminary Report” Br J Ophth 46:1962, 404/415. |
Law et al., “Retinal Complications After Aqueous Shunt Surgical Procedures for Glaucoma” Arch Ophthal.; Dec. 1996; vol. 114:1473/1480. |
Lee et al. “Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies.” Investigative Ophthalmology. vol. 5 No. 1: 59-64. Feb. 1966. |
Lee et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of the aqueous flow in eyes implanted with the trabeculo/suprachoroidal glaucoma seton” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:948 (1992). |
Lee KY. Trabeculo/suprachoroidal shunt for treating recalcitrant and secondary glaucoma. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 1991. |
Leske MC, HeijI A, Hussein M, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:48/56. |
Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al and the CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1943/53. |
Losche, W., “Proposals for improvement of cyclodialysis” Klin Monatsblatter Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild 1952 121(6):715/6 [Article in German with English translation included]. |
Marx et al., “Use of the Ganciclovir Implant in the Treatment of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Retinitis” Arch Ophthal.; Jul. 1996; vol. 114:815/820. |
McPherson “Combined Trabeculotomy and Cataract Extraction as a Single Operation*” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., vol. LXXIV, 1976; 251/260. |
Mehta KR. “The suprachoroidal hema wedge in glaucoma surgery” American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting 1977 pp. 144. |
Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open/angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1651/7. |
Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1612/21. |
Miki, MD et al., “Intraocular Cannula for Continuous, Chronic Drug Delivery/Histopathic Observations and Function” Arch Ophthal.; May 1985; vol. 103:712/717. |
Molteno et al. “Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma” South African Medical Journal, Jun. 26, 1976;50(27):1062/6. |
Molteno et al. “The Vicryl tie technique for inserting a draining implant in the treatment of secondary glaucoma.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1986; 14:343/354. |
Moses RA “Detachment of ciliary body/anatomical and physical considerations” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Assoc. for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, US, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1965. |
Nesterov, AP, et al., “Surgical stimulation of the uveoscleral outflow. Experimental studies on enucleated human eyes” Acta Opthalmol (Copenh) June; 57(3):409/17 (1979). |
Nguyen et al., “Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants” Arch Ophthal.; May 1998; vol. 116:571/575. |
O'Brien et al. “Cyclodialysis” Arch Ophthal. 1949;42(5):606/619. |
Odrich. “The New Technique During Complex Tube-Shunt Implantation”. J. Glaucoma. vol. 9 No. 3 (2000):205-280. |
Olsen, Timothy W., et al., Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, No. 5, Nov. 2006, pp. 777-787.e2. |
Ozdamar, A., et al., “Suprachoroidal seton implantation in refractory glaucoma: a novel surgical technique” J. Glaucoma Aug. 2003; 12(4):354/9. |
Pinnas, G. et al. “Cyclodialysis with teflon tube implants” Am J. Ophthalmol Nov. 1969; 68(5):879/883. |
Portney GL, “Silicone elastomer implantation cyclodialysis.” Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 10-12. |
Pruett et al., “The Fishmouth Phenomenon/II. Wedge Scleral Buckling” Arch Ophthal.; Oct. 1977; vol. 95:1782/1787. |
Qadeer “Acrylic Gonio/Subconjunctival Plates in Glaucoma Surgery” Br J Ophthalmol. Jun. 1954; 38(6): 353-356. |
Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open/angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:83/91. |
Richards et al. “Artificial Drainage Tubes for Glaucoma” Am J Ophth 60:1965,405/408. |
Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. The Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996; 337 / 343). |
Rohen, Johannes W., Anatomy of the Aqueous Outflow Channels, Glaucoma, vol. 1, Chapter 14, pp. 277-296, Edited by J.E. Cairns, Grune & Stratton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1986. |
Rosenberg, L., et al. “Implants in glaucoma surgery” Chapter 88, The Glaucomas, Ritch et al. Eds. 2nd Ed. Mosby St. Louis 1986; p. 1783/1807. |
Row, H., “Operation to control glaucoma: preliminary report” (1934) Arch. Ophthal 12:325. |
Rowan, Patrick J., MD, Combined Cyclodialysis and Cataract Surgery, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Dec. 1998, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 962-968 (9 pages). |
Sampimon “A New Approach to Filtering Glaucoma Surgery” Ophthalmologica (Basel) 151:1966, 637/644. |
Schappert S. Office visits for glaucoma: United States, 1991/92. Advance data from vital and health statistics. vol. 262. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1995. |
Shaffer RN, Weiss DI. Concerning cyclodialysis and hypotony. Arch Ophthalmol 68: 25, 1962. |
Solx Clinical Literature Handout; Industry Show Feb. 2006; “The SOLX Gold Micro/shunt (GMS) treatment”. |
Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause/specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1412/7. |
Sourdille et al. “Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in non/perforating trabecular surgery.” J Cataract Refract Surg 25: 332-339. (1999). |
Spiegel et al. “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers. vol. 30, No. 6: 492-494. Jun. 1999. |
Srinivasan, R., et al., “Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification” J. Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2173/6 (2002). |
Suguro K, Toris CB, Pederson JE. Uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye using a fluorescent tracer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985: 26, 810. |
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429/40. |
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and Glaucoma Laser Trial Follow/up Study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthahnol 1995;120:718/31. |
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medicines. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1403/13. |
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open/angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369/74. |
Toris CB. Extravascular albumin concentration of the uvea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 43. |
Toris et al. “Effect of intraocular pressure on uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 26 (1985) 1745-1749. |
Toris, C., et al., “Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye” Am J. Ophthalmol., 127:407/12 (1999). |
Troncosco, U.M., “Cyclodialysis with insertion of metal implant in treatment of glaucoma Preliminary report” Arch. Ophthal. 23:270 (1940). |
Troncoso, Manuel U., Tantalum implants for inducing hypotny, Am Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32(4):499-508 (1949). |
Van Der Veen et al. “The Gonioseton, a surgical treatment for chronic glaucoma” Documenta Ophthalmologica Oct. 1990, vol. 75, Issue 3-4, pp. 365-375. |
Wagner, Justin A., et al., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., Published in edited form in Sep. 2004, vol. 45, Issue 9, pp. 3203-3206. |
Yablonski, “Trabeculectomy with Internal Tube Shunt: a novel glaucoma surgery” J. Glaucoma 14:91/97 (2005). |
Yablonski, M., “Some thoughts on the pressure dependence of uveoscleral flow” Journal of Glaucoma, 12(1):90/92 (2003). |
Zhou, J., et al., “A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis” J Glaucoma. 14(1):74/83 (2005). |
In the Matter of Austrialian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Opponent's Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition, dated Apr. 10, 2014. |
In the Matter of Austrialian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Opponent's amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Sep. 10, 2014). |
In the Matter of Austrialian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014). |
In the Matter of Austrialian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014). |
In the Matter of Austrialian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014). |
Schocket, Stanley S. “Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-To-The-Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma.” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc.vol. LXXXIX. (1986):743-798. |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Robert L. Stamper in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 4, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Jonathan G. Crowston in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 6, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Anne Jen-Wan Lee in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 7, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 8, 2015). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 10, 2015). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 11, 2015). |
Transcend Medical Inc. v. Glaukos Corporation, Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4 (d) (United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated Dec. 6, 2013; case No. C.A. No. 13-830 (MSG) and Certificate of Service, dated Dec. 9, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140188030 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12905003 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 14199737 | US | |
Parent | 11615642 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12905003 | US | |
Parent | 10712277 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11615642 | US |