The invention relates to wireless communication systems and in particular to reducing interference by radio frequency (RF) transmitters on RF communication systems.
The base stations 130 are connected to Radio Network Controllers (RNC) 140-1, 140-2, and the RNCs 140 are connected to a Core Network 150. In this application the RNC is defined as a node in the network that controls one or several base stations. This functionality can be included is the base stations or be a separate node in the network.
A scheduler for controlling the communication between the mobile terminal 110, 120 and the base station 130 is placed in the base station 130 or in the RNC 140, not shown in the figure. The scheduler determines where in the time- and frequency domains the mobile terminal 110, 120 and the base station 130 should transmit and receive its resources. Resources are in this context defined as the data or control information to be sent. Usually the scheduler does not allocate the whole frequency band to one user. The frequency band is divided in smaller parts called frequency carriers. In Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) one frequency carrier is 200 kHz and in Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS) one frequency carrier is 5 MHz. In Long Term Evolution (LTE) the smallest system bandwidth is 1.4 MHz and control signaling is spread over the entire system bandwidth (BW), but the smallest frequency carrier that can be allocated to one user is 180 kHz. In LTE this is called a resource block and consists of 12 sub carriers on 15 kHz BW each. The scheduler allocates both uplink frequency carriers and downlink frequency carriers. The distance between an uplink carrier and a downlink carrier allocated to one user is called the duplex distance
When the mobile terminal 110, 120 or the base station 130 is receiving, the signal is received at antenna 250 and forwarded to the Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) 260 via the duplexer 240.
Even if the uplink frequency carrier and the downlink frequency carriers are spaced apart by the duplex distance some energy will leak from the transmitter (TX) to the receiver (RX) and increase the noise in the receiver. A majority of this noise can be removed by filters such as SAW filter 220 but some energy will still leak to the receiver through the duplexer 240. The leakage from the transmitter to the receiver will increase with high transmit power.
Also, distortion caused by external interferers, the transmitted signal, and the receiver nonlinearities may position unwanted tones in the receive band and thus degrade the receiver signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR).
The problem with the existing solution is associated with cost. The external inter-stage SAW filter 220 is expensive, and concepts to avoid it may be power-hungry and difficult to implement. If the SAW filter is removed this will increase the linearity requirements on the transmitters especially at high power levels.
Another problem is that the number of external SAWs will increase with increased band-support, thus giving a big cost penalty for multiple-band transceivers.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method of scheduling which minimizes the power leakage from the transmitter to the receiver.
According to an embodiment of the invention the scheduler determines the transmit power of mobile terminals connected to a base station. This transmit power is the required transmit power that is needed for the mobile terminal to transmit its uplink resources. The scheduler the schedules the uplink and downlink recourses on frequency carriers such that the mobile terminal with the highest transmit power gets the largest duplex distance.
The transmit power of the mobile terminals may be determined by estimating the path loss between the mobile terminals and the base station.
Several uplink carriers and downlink carriers may be scheduled at the same time. In this case the minimum distance between any uplink carrier and any downlink carrier may be maximized.
The mobile terminal may send a message to the base station with information about its transmit power. This message can be sent on different control channels.
On some frequency bands a strong interferer such as a TV broadcast signal can be found on a neighboring frequency band. This interferer together with the uplink transmission may result in an inter modulation frequency. In some embodiments of the invention the uplink frequency carriers and downlink frequency carriers are scheduled such that the downlink frequency carrier does not overlap the said inter modulation frequency.
The inter modulation may be calculated according to fUE
An advantage of the present invention is that the noise leakage from the transmitter to the receiver in the mobile terminal is lowered.
Methods according to embodiments of the present invention may lower the power consumption of the mobile terminal. Since embodiments of the invention may reduce the received noise level, less baseband resources can be allocated to advanced noise reduction and noise cancelling algorithms. This means that the average computation complexity of a receiver may be decreased, which in turn saves computational power and increases battery time. If the SAW filters can be avoided less space in the mobile terminal is occupied with filters.
The invention will now be described more fully below with reference to the drawings, in which
In ideal circumstances the mobile terminal 110, 120 transmits all energy within its uplink frequency carrier. But under real circumstances some energy will leak 310 to the neighboring frequency carriers. The leakage is larger for the closest frequency carriers and decreases with the distance from the allocated frequency carrier.
In the future it is likely that mobile telecommunication will use the 700 MHz band. One such band could be UMTS band XII which uses the band 698-716 MHz for uplink traffic and 728-746 MHz for downlink traffic. If fixed duplex distance scheduling is used, this means that the duplex distance is just 30 MHz. On other frequency bands the duplex distance is larger. For instance the duplex distance for UMTS band I is 190 MHz.
The 700 MHz band is especially useful for large cells due to propagation reasons. If the mobile terminal 110, 120 transmits from the cell edge in a large cell to the base station 130, it must transmit with high power to be connected to the base station. Since the mobile terminal 110, 120 transmits with high power and the duplex distance is relatively small there is a risk that some energy will leak from the transmitter to the receiver of the mobile terminal.
Since the internal noise leakage between the transmitter and the receiver is large compared to other noise sources in the mobile terminal, the suppression of this noise is very important when designing non-expensive FDD transceivers without external filters, such as SAW filters.
As can be seen in
According to embodiments of the present invention the uplink and downlink resources are allocated on frequency carriers in such a manner that the leakage from the transmitter to the receiver in the mobile terminal is minimized, or at least reduced.
There are several ways for the scheduler to determine the transmit power of the mobile terminals. As a first example, the transmit power of a mobile terminal may be determined by estimating the path loss between the mobile terminal and the base station. The path loss can be determined from the Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reports where the mobile terminal reports its channel quality to the base station. If the mobile terminal and the base station experiences bad channel quality, one way to compensate this is to transmit with a high power. This applies to both uplink traffic and downlink traffic. The transmit power of the mobile terminal may also be determined by studying the transmit power of the base station. The mobile terminal may also signal its transmit power to the base station. This information can be sent as an Radio Resource Control (RRC) message Further, historical information from the power control algorithms can be used to determine the transmit power of the mobile terminals.
In order to achieve large bandwidths in the future, e.g. for International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT)—Advanced standards or similar, combining frequency carriers in multiple frequency bands is a prerequisite.
It may be noted that it is not necessary that all frequency bands belong to the same base station. One scheduler can allocate uplink and downlink frequency carriers for several base stations.
Since the system never can guarantee larger duplex distance than the minimum requirement in the specification, all mobile terminals must be able to handle the minimum duplex distance, but on average, power savings are feasible if the average duplex distance is as large as possible.
On some frequency bands there might be a strong interferer on neighboring frequency. This could be a TV broadcast transmission, sent with a high power. This could be a problem, especially on the 700 MHz band since TV transmitters is found on neighbor frequencies. This could lead to an inter modulation frequency between an uplink frequency carrier and the neighboring interferer. If this inter modulation frequency should overlap a downlink frequency carrier in the mobile terminal, the noise in the mobile terminal would increase. Therefore it is favorable if a downlink frequency carrier is allocated to be outside the inter modulation frequency between the neighboring interferer and an uplink frequency carrier. The inter modulation frequency carrier could be calculated according to
fUE
or
fUE
where
fUE
finterferer is the neighbor interferer
fUE
The interfering signal finterferer is usually known to the scheduler.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09157916 | Apr 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/054638 | 4/8/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/14/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/118983 | 10/21/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5917809 | Ribner et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6240077 | Vuong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
20020188668 | Jeffery et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030109257 | Nilsson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040208253 | Joo | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060002323 | Hildebrand et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009231 | Emami et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080025254 | Love et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080279125 | Hottinen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090135748 | Lindoff et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20110075594 | Burstrom et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120044818 | Lindoff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075989 | Roessel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1605220 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1714587 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1943141 | Apr 2007 | CN |
102005004152 | Aug 2006 | DE |
0249385 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Figueiredo, D. et al., “Impact of Adjacent Channel Interference on the Capacity of Wcdmaifdd Networks”, Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC), 2004, pp. 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120076056 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61169490 | Apr 2009 | US |