An arrangement is disclosed whereby a valve bore is offset from a plunger bore in a fluid end of a reciprocating pump to relieve stress.
In oil field operations, reciprocating pumps are used for various purposes. Reciprocating pumps are used for operations such as cementing, acidizing, or fracturing of a subterranean well. These reciprocating pumps run for relatively short periods of time, but they operate on a frequent basis and oftentimes at extremely high pressures. A reciprocating pump is mounted to a truck or a skid for transport to various well sites and must be of appropriate size and weight for road and highway regulations.
Reciprocating pumps or positive displacement pumps for oil field operations deliver a fluid or slurry, which may carry solid particles (for example, a sand proppant), at pressures up to 20,000 psi to the wellbore. A known pump for oilfield operations includes a power end driving more than one plunger reciprocally in a corresponding fluid end or pump chamber. The fluid end may comprise three or five plunger bores arranged transversely across a fluid head, and each plunger bore may be intersected by suction and discharge valve bores. In a known reciprocating pump, the axis of each plunger bore intersects perpendicularly with a common axis of the suction and discharge valve bores.
In a mode of operating a known three plunger bore reciprocating pump at high fluid pressures (for example, around or greater than 20,000 psi), a maximum pressure and thus stress can occur within a given pump chamber as the plunger moves longitudinally in the fluid end towards top dead center (TDC), compressing the fluid therein. One of the other pump chambers will be in discharge and thus at a very low pressure, and the other pump chamber will have started to compress the fluid therein.
It has been discovered that, in a given pump chamber, the areas of highest stress occur at the intersection of each plunger bore with its suction and discharge valve bores as the plunger moves to TDC. The occurrence of high stress at these areas can shorten the life of the fluid end.
JP 2000-170643 is directed to a multiple reciprocating pump having a small size. The pump has three piston bores in which the pistons reciprocate but, so that a compact pump configuration can be provided, the axis of each suction valve bore is arranged perpendicularly to its respective discharge valve bore (that is, so that there is a laterally directed discharge from the fluid end).
JP 2000-170643 also teaches that a limit as to the volume of fluid that can be pumped by a small reciprocating pump is the size of suction and discharge valve bores. Contrary to the embodiments disclosed herein, the teaching of JP 2000-170643 is not concerned with reducing stresses arising at the intersection of piston, suction and discharge bores. Rather, JP 2000-170643 teaches moving the axes of each of the outside suction and discharge valve bores outwardly with respect to their plunger bore axis to enable the volume of each of the suction and discharge valve bores to be increased. Thus, with an increased pump speed, an increased volumetric flow can be achieved with a pump that still has a similar overall dimensional profile. In addition, JP 2000-170643 teaches that the valve bores are moved outwardly without increasing the amount of material between the suction and discharge bores. This is because the reconfiguration of the pump in JP 2000-170643 is not concerned with reducing stresses within the pump in use.
In a first aspect there is disclosed a fluid end for a multiple reciprocating pump assembly. The multiple reciprocating pump assembly may, for example, comprise three or five plunger bores, and may find application in oilfield operations and/or may operate with fluids at high pressures (for example as high as 20,000 psi or greater).
When the fluid end comprises at least three plunger bores (for example, three or five plunger bores), each can receive a reciprocating plunger, and each can have a plunger bore axis. The plunger bores can be arranged across the fluid head to define a central plunger bore and lateral plunger bores located on either side of the central plunger bore (for example, one or two lateral plunger bores located on either side of the central plunger bore to define a fluid end with three or five plunger bores respectively).
At least three respective suction valve bores (for example, three or five suction valve bores) can be provided for and be in fluid communication with the plunger bores. Each suction valve bore can receive a suction valve and have a suction valve bore axis.
At least three respective discharge valve bores (for example, three or five discharge valve bores) can be provided for and be in fluid communication with the plunger bores. Each discharge valve bore can receive a discharge valve and have a discharge valve bore axis.
In accordance with the first aspect, at least one of the axes of the suction and discharge valve bores, for at least one of the lateral plunger bores, is inwardly offset in the fluid end from its respective plunger bore axis.
It has been surprisingly discovered that this inward offsetting can reduce stress that would otherwise occur at the intersection of each plunger bore with its suction or discharge valve bores as the plunger moves to TDC. The reduction of stress can increase the useful operating life of the fluid end.
In certain embodiments, at least one of the axes of at least one of the suction and discharge valve bores for each of the lateral plunger bores may be inwardly offset. For example, for the lateral plunger bores, the at least one offset axis may be inwardly offset to the same extent as the other at least one offset axis.
In certain embodiments, the axes of both the suction and discharge valve bores may be inwardly offset for at least one of the lateral plunger bores. For example, the axes of both the suction and discharge valve bores are inwardly offset to the same extent.
In certain embodiments, for each of the plunger bores, the suction valve bore may oppose the discharge valve bore. This arrangement is easier to manufacture, maintain and service than, for example, arrangements in which the axis of each suction valve bore is perpendicular to the discharge valve bore. In addition, the opposing bore arrangement may induce less stress in the fluid end in use than, for example, a perpendicular bore arrangement.
In certain embodiments for each of the plunger bores, the axes of the suction and discharge valve bores may be aligned, for even greater ease of manufacture, maintenance and service. In certain embodiments, the at least one axis may be inwardly offset in an amount ranging from about 10% to about 60% of the diameter of the plunger bore. In certain other embodiments, the offset axis may be inwardly offset in an amount ranging from about 20% to about 50%, or from about 30% to about 40%, of the diameter of the plunger bore.
In other certain embodiments, the at least one axis may be inwardly offset in an amount ranging from about 0.5 to about 2.5 inches. In certain other embodiments, the offset axis may be offset in an amount ranging from about 1.5 to 2.5 inches. These dimensions may represent an optimal range for many bore diameters of fluid end configurations employed in fracking pumps in oilfield and related applications.
Other aspects, features, and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are a part of this disclosure and which illustrate, by way of example, principles of the fluid end as disclosed herein.
Notwithstanding any other forms which may fall within the scope of the fluid end as set forth in the Summary, specific embodiments of the fluid end and reciprocating pump will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the Description of the Figures and in the Detailed Description of Specific Embodiments, a pump that comprises three plunger, suction and discharge bores is hereafter referred to as a “triplex”, and a pump that comprises five plunger, suction and discharge bores is hereafter referred to as a “quint”, being an abbreviation of “quintuplex”.
In the drawings:
Referring to
The pump 12 is a triplex having a set of three cylinders 16, each including a respective plunger bore 17. The three (or, in the case of a quint, five) cylinders/plunger bores can be arranged transversely across the fluid end 15. A plunger 35 reciprocates in a respective plunger bore 17 and, in
Each plunger bore 17 is in communication with a fluid inlet or suction manifold 19 and a fluid outlet side 20 in communication with a pump outlet 21 (
A crankshaft housing 13 encloses a crankshaft 25, which can be mechanically connected to a motor (not shown). The motor rotates the crankshaft 25 in order to drive the reciprocating pump 12. In one embodiment, the crankshaft 25 is cammed so that fluid is pumped from each cylinder 16 at alternating times. As is readily appreciable by those skilled in the art, alternating the cycles of pumping fluid from each of the cylinders 16 helps minimize the primary, secondary, and tertiary (et al.) forces associated with the pumping action.
A gear 24 is mechanically connected to the crankshaft 25, with the crankshaft 25 being rotated by the motor (not shown) through gears 26 and 24. A crank pin 28 attaches to the main shaft 23, shown substantially parallel to axis Ax of the crankshaft 25. A connector rod 27 is connected to the crankshaft 25 at one end. The other end of connector rod 27 is secured by a bushing to a crosshead or gudgeon pin 31, which pivots within a crosshead 29 in housing 30 as the crankshaft 25 rotates at the one end of the connector rod 27. The pin 31 also functions to hold the connector rod 27 longitudinally relative to the crosshead 29. A pony rod 33 extends from the crosshead 29 in a longitudinally opposite direction from the crankshaft 25. The connector rod 27 and the crosshead 29 convert rotational movement of the crankshaft 25 into longitudinal movement of the pony rod 33.
The plunger 35 is connected to the pony rod 33 for pumping the fluid passing through each cylinder 16. Each cylinder 16 includes an interior or cylinder chamber 39, which is where the plunger 35 compresses the fluid being pumped by reciprocating pump 12. The cylinder 16 also includes an inlet (or suction) valve 41 and an outlet (or discharge) valve 43. Usually the inlet and outlet valves 41, 43 are arranged in an opposed relationship in cylinder 16 and may, for example, lie on a common axis.
The valves 41 and 43 are usually spring-loaded and are actuated by a predetermined differential pressure. The inlet (suction) valve 41 actuates to control fluid flow from the fluid inlet 19 into the cylinder chamber 39, and the outlet (discharge) valve 43 actuates to control fluid flow from the cylinder chamber 39 to the outlet side 20 and thence to the pump outlet 21. Depending on the size of the pump 12, the plunger 35 may be one of a plurality of plungers, for example, three or five plungers may be utilized.
The plunger 35 reciprocates, or moves longitudinally, toward and away from the chamber 39, as the crankshaft 25 rotates. As the plunger 35 moves longitudinally away from the cylinder chamber 39, the pressure of the fluid inside the chamber 39 decreases, creating a differential pressure across the inlet valve 41, which actuates the valve 41 and allows the fluid to enter the cylinder chamber 39 from the fluid inlet 19. The fluid continues to enter the cylinder chamber 39 as the plunger 35 continues to move longitudinally away from the cylinder 17 until the pressure difference between the fluid inside the chamber 39 and the fluid in the fluid inlet 19 is small enough for the inlet valve 41 to actuate to its closed position.
As the plunger 35 begins to move longitudinally into the cylinder 16, the pressure on the fluid inside of the cylinder chamber 39 begins to increase. Fluid pressure inside the cylinder chamber 39 continues to increase as the plunger 35 approaches the chamber 39 until the differential pressure across the outlet valve 43 is large enough to actuate the valve 43 and allow the fluid to exit the chamber 39 through the fluid outlet 21.
The inlet valve 41 is located within a suction valve bore 59 and the outlet valve 43 is located within a discharge valve bore 57. In the embodiment depicted, both valve bores 57, 59 are in communication with, and extend orthogonally to the plunger bore 17. The valve bores 57, 59 as shown are also co-axial (that is, lying on a common axis, or with parallel axes), but they may be offset relative to each other as described below.
It should be noted that the opposing arrangement of the valve bores 57, 59 depicted in
In addition, it is understood that, where stress reduction in the fluid end is desirable, the opposing arrangement of the valve bores 57, 59 may induce less stress in the fluid end, especially at high operating pressures of 20,000 psi or greater, when compared with a perpendicular or other angled bore arrangement.
Referring now to
In the embodiment of
It has been discovered that the highest point of stress concentration in pump 12 occurs at the intersection of a plunger bore with the suction (or inlet) and discharge (or outlet) valve bores. The maximum stress in the fluid end occurs when one plunger (for example, a lateral plunger) is approaching Top Dead Center (TDC), another is approaching Bottom Dead Center (BDC), and a third has just started moving from BDC to TDC.
It has further been discovered that, to reduce fluid end stress, some or all of the lateral (outside) valve bores 57a, 57c, 59a, 59c at the suction and discharge side may be inwardly offset so that an axis 65 of at least some of the plunger bores (that is, the lateral plunger bore axes 65a, 65c) does not intersect with a common valve bore axis 63, such that at least one of the lateral valve bore axis 63a or 63c is inwardly offset from its respective lateral plunger bore axes 65a or 65c. This inward lateral offset has been observed to noticeably reduce the stress in the fluid end 15 that arises as a result of fluid flowing therein, especially at the high pressures that can be employed in oilfield operations (for example, with oil well fracking fluid).
In the three cylinder triplex pump embodiment of
Furthermore, whilst in this embodiment the amount of inward offset from both the lateral plunger bores and axes toward the central plunger bore and axis is the same, the amount of offset can be different. For example, the suction and discharge valve bores on one side can be more or less laterally offset to that of the suction and discharge valve bores on the other side of the fluid end. Additionally, either or both of the suction and discharge valve bores on one side may be laterally offset by different extents, or one may not be offset at all, and this offset may be different to each of the suction and discharge valve bores on the other side of the fluid end, which also may be offset differently to each other.
In any case, the inward offsetting of both the lateral suction and discharge valve bores 59a, 57a and 59c, 57c, by the same amount and to the same extent, has been surprisingly observed to maximize stress reduction within the fluid end at the high fluid operating pressures, as explained in Example 1.
As indicated above, in the three cylinder triplex pump embodiment of
In the embodiment of
The amount of inward offset of the valve bores 59, 57 and the plunger bores 61 can be significant. For example, for 4.5 inch diameter bores, the valve bore 59, 57, may be inwardly offset 2 inches from a respective plunger bore 61. The amount of inward offset may be measured from axis to axis. For example, the distance can be set by referring to the distance that the common axis 63a or 63c of the valve bores 57a or 57c and 59a or 59c is offset either from its respective plunger bore axis 65a or 65c, or from the central plunger bore axis 65b (or where the central valve bore is not offset, as offset from the central common axis 63b of the valve bores 57b and 59b).
In any case, the amount of the offset can be about 40% of the diameter of the plunger bore, though it can, for example, range from about 10% to about 60%. Where the inward offset of each of the lateral valve bores 59a, 59c and 57a, 57c is 2 inches, the distance from axis 63a of valve bores 59a, 57c to axis 63c of valve bores 59c, 57c thus becomes 4 inches closer than in known fluid ends of similar dimensions.
In other embodiments, the inward offset of each lateral valve bore can range from about 0.25 inch to about 2.5 inch; from about 0.5 inch to about 2.0 inch; from about 0.75 inch to about 2.0 inch; from about 1 inch to about 2 inch; from about 0.25 inch to about 1.25 inch; from about 1.5 inch to about 2.5 inch; from about 1.5 inch to about 2.0 inch; or from about 1.5 inch to about 1.75 inch.
This moving of the lateral valve bores inwardly can represent a significant reduction in the overall dimension and weight of the fluid end. However, one limit to the amount of inward offset of the lateral (or outside) valve bores toward the central valve bore can be the amount of supporting metal between the valve bores.
When the lateral (or outside) suction valve bores 59 are inwardly offset as described with reference to
A conventional suction manifold corresponds to conventional bolt patterns that would be located at a greater distance than that occurring between the valve bores 59a, 57a, to valve bores 59c, 57c depicted in
Referring now to
In
In another embodiment shown in
Alternatively, the suction valve bores 59a, 59b and the discharge valve bores 57a, 57b corresponding to the plunger bores 61a, 61b may be offset to the right and to the same extent (not shown). In this alternative, the suction and discharge valve bores 59c, 57c that correspond to the plunger bore 61a would not be offset.
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment shown in
Due to the non-uniform offset of the discharge valve bores, a conventional discharge manifold is not employed and instead a modified discharge manifold is bolted onto the discharge fluid end 15 of this embodiment. However, a conventional suction manifold may be employed.
In another embodiment shown in
Due to the non-uniform offset of the suction valve bores a conventional suction manifold is not employed and instead a modified suction manifold is bolted onto the suction fluid end 15 of this embodiment. However, a conventional discharge manifold may be employed.
It should be noted that the offsetting of just the lateral suction valve bores, or the offsetting of just the lateral discharge valve bores, can also be employed in a quint fluid end set-up, although this is not illustrated to avoid repetition.
Referring now to
In the embodiment of
In the quint fluid end embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Referring to the new bolt pattern of
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A non-limiting example will now be provided to illustrate how the inward offsetting of a lateral valve bore was predicted by finite element analysis (FEA) to reduce the overall amount of stress in a fluid end in operation. In the following example, the FEA tests were conducted for a triplex fluid end, although it was noted that the findings also applied to a quintuplex fluid end.
The FEA experiments were conducted to compare the stresses induced in a number of new fluid end configurations having three cylinders against a known (existing and unmodified) three cylinder fluid end configuration. In the known fluid end configuration the axis of each plunger bore intersected perpendicularly with a common axis of the suction and discharge valve bores.
In these FEA stress tests, each fluid end was subjected to a working fluid pressure of 15,000 psi, commensurate with that experienced in usual applications. The pressure of fluid in the lateral discharge bore was observed by FEA to be 16,800 psi.
The view in
In the FEA stress tests, a single (or mono) block fluid end and a triplex fluid end were each modeled. The triplex fluid end configurations modeled included one lateral suction valve bore 59 and one discharge valve bore 57 each being inwardly offset by 1.5 inches and by 2 inches as indicated in
The stress result predicted by FEA was correlated to the Von Mises yield criterion (in psi) and the results were plotted for each of 0 inch offset (that is, an existing fluid end), and 1.5 inch and 2 inch offset (that is, new fluid end). The results are shown in the graphs of
As can be seen, FEA predicted that the greatest amount of stress reduction occurred with the 2 inch inward offset configuration of the valve bores in a triplex. For a single block fluid end the modeling of offset did not produce much of reduction in stress.
The overall stress reduction in the triplex fluid end for a 2 inch inward offset was noted to be approximately 30% (that is, from ˜97,000 psi to less than 69,000 psi as shown in
In the foregoing description of certain embodiments, specific terminology has been resorted to for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the specific terms so selected, and it is to be understood that each specific term includes other technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar technical purpose. Terms such as “left” and right”, “front” and “rear”, “above” and “below”, “top” and “bottom” and the like are used as words of convenience to provide reference points and are not to be construed as limiting terms.
In this specification, the word “comprising” is to be understood in its “open” sense, that is, in the sense of “including”, and thus not limited to its “closed” sense, that is the sense of “consisting only of”. A corresponding meaning is to be attributed to the corresponding words “comprise”, “comprised” and “comprises” where they appear.
In addition, the foregoing describes only some embodiments of the fluid end and reciprocating pump, and alterations, modifications, additions and/or changes can be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosed embodiments, the embodiments being illustrative and not restrictive.
Furthermore, the fluid end and reciprocating pump have described in connection with what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the fluid end and reciprocating pump are not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Also, the various embodiments described above may be implemented in conjunction with other embodiments, for example, aspects of one embodiment may be combined with aspects of another embodiment to realize yet other embodiments. Further, each independent feature or component of any given assembly may constitute an additional embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/314,831, filed Dec. 8, 2011, which claims priority to provisional application No. 61/421,453 filed Dec. 9, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006879 | Benedek | Jul 1935 | A |
2559659 | Redman | Jul 1951 | A |
2666026 | Gibbs | Jan 1954 | A |
2732810 | Simpson | Jan 1956 | A |
2776701 | Denis | Jan 1957 | A |
3081252 | Preiser et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3159559 | Eberhardt, III | Dec 1964 | A |
3427988 | William et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3470077 | Higgins | Sep 1969 | A |
3679332 | Yohpe | Jul 1972 | A |
3810716 | Abrahams et al. | May 1974 | A |
3844921 | Benedict | Oct 1974 | A |
3919068 | Gary | Nov 1975 | A |
3963384 | Bastenhof | Jun 1976 | A |
4097357 | Jacquelin | Jun 1978 | A |
4339227 | Furst | Jul 1982 | A |
4370211 | Hybler | Jan 1983 | A |
4378853 | Chia et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4412792 | LaBorde et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4520837 | Cole et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4861241 | Gamboa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878815 | Stachowiak | Nov 1989 | A |
5059101 | Valavaara | Oct 1991 | A |
5102297 | Thompson | Apr 1992 | A |
5127807 | Eslinger | Jul 1992 | A |
5154589 | Ruhl et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5171136 | Pacht | Dec 1992 | A |
5246355 | Matzner et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
D354495 | Tojo | Jan 1995 | S |
D355199 | Ousey | Feb 1995 | S |
D361575 | Makino | Aug 1995 | S |
5584672 | Simonette | Dec 1996 | A |
5636975 | Tiffany et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639227 | Mills | Jun 1997 | A |
5823541 | Dietle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839468 | Allred | Nov 1998 | A |
5848878 | Conti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5947697 | Morrison | Sep 1999 | A |
D420683 | Suzuki | Feb 2000 | S |
6065453 | Zych | May 2000 | A |
6382940 | Blume | May 2002 | B1 |
6386751 | Wootan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419459 | Sibbing | Jul 2002 | B1 |
D461733 | Iida | Aug 2002 | S |
D461827 | Koebbe | Aug 2002 | S |
6544012 | Blume | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588405 | Streicher et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595278 | Lam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623259 | Blume | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6705396 | Ivannikov et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6843313 | Hult | Jan 2005 | B2 |
D506210 | Selic et al. | Jun 2005 | S |
6910871 | Blume | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7036688 | Stettes et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7118114 | Burdick et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7186097 | Blume | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7255163 | Rivard | Aug 2007 | B2 |
D552139 | Cho | Oct 2007 | S |
D556861 | Yokohari | Dec 2007 | S |
D556862 | Yokohari | Dec 2007 | S |
D557286 | Pedrollo | Dec 2007 | S |
7335002 | Vicars | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341435 | Vicars | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364412 | Kugelev et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404704 | Kugelev et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D583389 | Bilger | Dec 2008 | S |
D584320 | Huang | Jan 2009 | S |
7484452 | Baxter et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513759 | Blume | Apr 2009 | B1 |
D603870 | Mehnert et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D605665 | Falkenberg | Dec 2009 | S |
D606629 | Tokumoto | Dec 2009 | S |
D623200 | Fulkerson et al. | Sep 2010 | S |
D629423 | Varini | Dec 2010 | S |
7874369 | Parker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
D641382 | Hawes et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
8016027 | Boyles | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8074999 | Burdick et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105055 | Small | Jan 2012 | B2 |
D655314 | Yoshimura et al. | Mar 2012 | S |
D657799 | Jung | Apr 2012 | S |
8147227 | Blume | Apr 2012 | B1 |
D660191 | Asaba | May 2012 | S |
D667532 | Asaba | Sep 2012 | S |
D670312 | Alexander et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
D670790 | Tokumoto | Nov 2012 | S |
D676111 | Fukano et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
D679290 | Skurdalsvold | Apr 2013 | S |
D679292 | Bayyouk et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
D679293 | Bayyouk et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
8465268 | Baxter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
D687125 | Matzner et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
D687929 | Asaba | Aug 2013 | S |
D691180 | Deleon et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
8662864 | Bayyouk et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8662865 | Bayyouk et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668470 | Bayyouk et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
D705817 | Bayyouk | May 2014 | S |
D706397 | Hawes et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
D706832 | Bayyouk et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
D706833 | Deleon et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
D720047 | Morodomi et al. | Dec 2014 | S |
20030235508 | Vicars | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040219042 | Kugelev et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060002806 | Baxter et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060159573 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070051508 | Pecorari et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070237651 | Tojo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080003122 | Tian et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080138224 | Vicars | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090123303 | Ohnishi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090314645 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100322802 | Kugelev | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110189040 | Vicars | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110198072 | Cote et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110308967 | Byrne | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120063936 | Baxter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120288387 | Freed et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130195701 | Skurdalsvold et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140322034 | Bayyouk et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
084230 | May 2013 | AR |
084231 | May 2013 | AR |
341981 | Apr 2012 | AU |
343913 | Aug 2012 | AU |
343914 | Aug 2012 | AU |
346409 | Jan 2013 | AU |
3020120007402 | Mar 2013 | BR |
2486223 | Sep 2010 | CA |
2350047 | Oct 2010 | CA |
138269 | Jul 2011 | CA |
2514769 | Sep 2011 | CA |
2716430 | May 2012 | CA |
144435 | Sep 2012 | CA |
2711206 | Sep 2012 | CA |
146660 | Oct 2013 | CA |
148192 | Oct 2013 | CA |
151028 | Oct 2013 | CA |
149166 | Jul 2014 | CA |
2833635 | Feb 2016 | CA |
ZL201030691447 | Feb 2001 | CN |
2677588 | Feb 2005 | CN |
200961570 | Oct 2007 | CN |
201096243 | Aug 2008 | CN |
201148968 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101397672 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101479473 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101571114 | Nov 2009 | CN |
ZL201230031196 | Dec 2012 | CN |
ZL201230337093 | Mar 2013 | CN |
ZL201230324855 | May 2013 | CN |
ZL201230513325 | May 2013 | CN |
ZL201230643096 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103339379 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103348139 | Oct 2013 | CN |
10214404 | Oct 2003 | DE |
0580196 | Jan 1994 | EP |
1780415 | May 2007 | EP |
1449280 | Sep 1976 | GB |
2419642 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2416811 | Sep 2009 | GB |
243221 | Feb 2012 | IN |
246712 | Mar 2013 | IN |
248994 | Nov 2014 | IN |
2000-170643 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000170643 | Jun 2000 | JP |
38797 | May 2013 | MX |
39667 | Sep 2013 | MX |
41048 | Feb 2014 | MX |
2168064-02 | May 2001 | RU |
87318 | Dec 2013 | RU |
SA2446 | Sep 2012 | SA |
SA3079 | Mar 2015 | SA |
D20121681 | Feb 2012 | SG |
D2012874-J | Aug 2012 | SG |
D2012875 | Aug 2012 | SG |
D20121221-J | Dec 2012 | SG |
191011 | Jul 2013 | SG |
191012 | Jul 2013 | SG |
109682 | Sep 2015 | UA |
109683 | Sep 2015 | UA |
WO-2004092538 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2005015024 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005088125 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2011018732 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011027273 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011054948 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011160069 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012078870 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012078888 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012145591 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2013116535 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office regarding Application No. 11847704.1 dated Nov. 25, 2015, 7 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 issued by IP Australia regarding related Australian patent application No. 2011338323 dated Jan. 8, 2016, 3 pages. |
“Canadian Exam Report dated Feb. 24, 2015, by the CIPO, re App No. 2833635”. |
“Canadian Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2015, re App No. 2833635”. |
“Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016, by the SIPO of China, re App No. 201280030481.X”. |
“Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2015, by the SIPO of China, re App No. 201380016217.5”. |
“Eurasia Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, re App No. 201390845”. |
“Eurasia Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, re App No. 201390846”. |
“Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2016, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,196”. |
“GCC Exam Report dated Aug. 23, 2015, re App No. 2011-19940”. |
“GCC Exam Report dated Jan. 22, 2015, re App No. 2011-19943”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 19, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/491,554”. |
“Office Action / Election Requirement dated Jun. 30, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,884”. |
“Office Action / Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 25, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,884”. |
“Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,165”. |
“Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,196”. |
“Office Action/Restriction dated Apr. 6, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,196”. |
“Office Action/Restriction dated Jun. 5, 2015, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,165”. |
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office regarding Application No. 11846478.3 dated Apr. 12, 2016, 7 pages. |
First Office Action issued by the Australian Government regarding Application No. 2011338305 dated Oct. 9, 2015, 3 pages. |
“Australia Examination Report, dated Jul. 22, 2013, by IP Australia, re Reg. No. 346409”. |
“Canadian Exam Report dated Feb. 11, 2014, by the CIPO, re App No. 149166”. |
“Canadian Examination Report, dated Aug. 20, 2013, by the CIPO, re App No. 149166”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,228”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 24, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,831”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 8, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,745”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 27, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/424,801”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 4, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/467,436”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 16, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/467,436”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 10, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/461,771”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 22, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/461,771”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 17, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,822”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 4, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. App No. 29/420,822”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 24, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/425,284”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 7, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/425,284”. |
“Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2014, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/451,842”. |
“Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,831”. |
A. Al-Hashem et al., “Cavitation Corrosion Behavior of Some Cast Alloys in Seawater”, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, 1996, 311-321. |
“Canadian Exam Report dated Jan. 10, 2103, re App No. 146660”. |
Cole B.N., “Strategy for Cross-Bores in High Pressure Containers,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1969, vol. 11 (2), pp. 151-176. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,822, filed May 14, 2012. |
“Search Report, dated Jan. 18, 2005, from the UK Patent Office, regarding App No. GB0424019.8”. |
“Search Report, dated Oct. 31, 2005, by the UK Patent Office, regarding App No. GB0516137.7”. |
“Examination Report by IP India, dated Aug. 31, 2012, re App No. 246713”. |
“Examination Report by IP India, dated Jan. 3, 2013, re App No. 248994”. |
“Examination Report by IP India, dated Mar. 28, 2013, re App No. 246713”. |
“Examination Report by IP India, dated Sep. 14, 2012, re App No. 246712”. |
“Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 9, 2007, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,221”. |
“Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2007, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,221”. |
“Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2012, by the USPTO, re Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/411,974”. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 19, 2012, regarding PCT/US2011/040960”. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/040960 dated Nov. 1, 2011, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/034397 dated Jun. 29, 2012, 10 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2013, by the ISA/US, regarding PCT/US2013/024172”. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 20, 2012, by ISA/KR, regarding PCT/US2011/063946. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 20, 2012, by ISA/KR, regarding PCT/US2011/063968”. |
L.M. Masu., “Numerical analysis of cylinders containing circular offset cross-bores—Abstract”, Mar. 1998, vol. 75, Issue 3. |
Makulsawatudom P., et al., “Stress Concentration at Crossholes in Thick Cylindrical Vessels,” Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 2004, vol. 39 (5), pp. 471-481. |
Masu L.M., “Cross Bore Configuration and Size Effects on the Stress Distribution in Thick-walled Cylinders,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1997, vol. 72 (2), pp. 171-176. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,822”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/399,897”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2007, by the USPTO, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,221”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/411,974”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 18, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/419,417”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 23, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 20/419,425”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 26, 2013, by the USPTO, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 29/445,736”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2008, by the USPTO, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,749”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 8, 2011, by the USPTO, regarding Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/363,376”. |
“Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/425,284”. |
“Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013, by USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,815”. |
“Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,745”. |
“Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,228”. |
“Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,749”. |
“Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2013, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,822”. |
“Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2012, by the USPTO, re Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/411,974”. |
“Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2007, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,749”. |
“Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2007, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,221”. |
“Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2010, by the USPTO, re Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/363,376”. |
Xie; He et al., “Fatigue Prediction for Pump End of High Pressure Fracturing Pump”, 2011, vol. 337, 81-86. |
EPO Communication noting intention to grant European patent and accepted text, issued by the European Patent Office regarding Application No. 11 847 704.1-1616 dated Mar. 20, 2017, 40 pages. |
Final Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China regarding Application No. 201180066904.9 dated Apr. 1, 2017, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China regarding Application No. 201180066898.7 dated Mar. 29, 2017, 15 pages. |
First Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China regarding Application No. 201180066904.9 dated Mar. 30, 2015, 13 pages. |
First Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China regarding Application No. 201180066898.7dated Apr. 3, 2015, 9 pages. |
English Description of Office Action from the Mexican Patent Office dated Aug. 15, 2017 regarding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/016008, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140322033 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61421453 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13314831 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14195165 | US |