The present disclosure generally relates to an offshore platform. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to an offshore bipod platform configured for development of undersea hydrocarbon resources in regions where ice is a potential hazard to such development.
Significant efforts are underway to explore and develop hydrocarbon resources in extreme environments such as the Arctic Ocean. Resource development is hampered in arctic regions by numerous hazards including ice, which impedes transportation and requires structures suitable to withstand the tremendous pressures exerted by multi-year floes (sheets of floating ice). Multi-year ice is understood to be ice which has survived at least one summer melting period and is thus more compacted and harder than newer ice. Structures capable of surviving such extreme conditions are generally expensive and tend to hamper production of the resource. Specialized structures are therefore needed to improve the economic viability of offshore hydrocarbon recovery.
The foregoing and other advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
Existing solutions to the problem of multi-year floes include gravity-based structures (GBS) and piled structures. Both GBS and piled structures typically use a conical shape at the waterline to assist in withstanding the force exerted by ice and floes against the structure.
A GBS is a large compartmentalized structure, made typically of steel and/or concrete but which may also include composite, ceramic, or other appropriate materials, which is positioned over a development site and lowered to the seafloor by at least partially filling the compartments with metal pellets or similar heavy materials. The total weight of a GBS must be sufficient to resist the force of floes pushing against the structure. The seafloor beneath a GBS requires extensive preparation as soft or muddy materials must be removed and replaced with gravel to form a level surface onto which the GBS is lowered. Further, in water depths beyond 20 meters, a GBS must either be extended to a sufficient height or the seafloor must be built up to support the GBS, both of which are costly solutions. A GBS is thus unsuitable for smaller hydrocarbon fields in soft or muddy seafloors since seafloor preparation becomes prohibitively expensive. Further, a GBS is sufficiently expensive to manufacture, install, and maintain that these structures are generally only used for recovery of large, proven hydrocarbon reserves.
An exemplary GBS is illustrated as
The exterior of first angled portion 109 is a sloped, ice-engaging surface 121 which extends from shoulder 117 to neckline 119 and is designed to withstand the impact of floes which occur at the waterline WL. The shoulder 117 is below the waterline WL and the neckline 119 is above the waterline WL such that ice in the sea, particularly floating ice, engages the first angled portion 109 at the sloped, ice-engaging surface 121. The ice-engaging surface 121 extends around the periphery of the GBS 100 so that ice from any direction will come into contact with the first angled portion 109 at the ice-engaging surface 121. The slope of the ice-engaging surface 121 causes any sheet of ice to rise up the slope and bend to a point of breaking and is typically between 40 degrees and 60 degrees from the horizontal and more preferably about 55 degrees from the horizontal. Broken ice chunks, called rubble, will work their way around the first angled portion 109, driven by the sea current or wind. Above the neckline 119 is neck 111 that extends up to top deck 101, but preferably with an second angled portion 113 to turn back any ice that slides up the sloped, ice-engaging surface 121 to the full height of the neck 111. The full bending of ice that is engaged with the second angled portion 113 should break even the most robust masses of ice.
A piled structure includes a base having an arrangement for attaching to pilings which are driven into the seafloor. The seafloor pilings thus provide resistance to floe forces without the bulk and weight of a GBS. One example of this advantageous structure is the conical piled monopod described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,071.
An exemplary piled structure is illustrated in
Base 151 of piled structure 150 is configured to rest on the seafloor 107 and has the form of a flange with holes spaced around the perimeter adapted to accommodate pilings 153 which are driven into the seafloor 107. Thus pilings 153 provide the means for maintaining position of the piled structure 150 on the seafloor 107 against the force of ice and floes.
Although piled structures are an improvement over a GBS, both piled structures and a GBS still have several crucial limitations which may make them unsuitable for some applications in arctic conditions. For example, the conical shape of GBS and piled structures means that all hydrocarbon recovery must be carried out through the narrowest section of the structure, which also runs directly through the middle of any deck placed atop the structure. The conical shape also requires decking to be cantilevered away from the structure, which can add structural weaknesses and make access to the water surface difficult. The decking is difficult to install either at the manufacturing facility because of concerns for transporting the structure or on-site because of difficult working conditions and the need for stability during installation. Further, existing monopods are constrained in available deck space based on the width of their neck and base, resulting in some monopods being unsuitable for production of undersea hydrocarbons.
The present disclosure is directed to a bipod or split-cone structure which overcomes many of the deficiencies discussed above. In some embodiments a bipod for use in ice prone offshore environments comprises a first member and a second member disposed on a seafloor, each member comprising an angled portion, a neck, and a base, wherein each angled portion is a semi-conical semicylinder disposed at the waterline, and wherein the first and second members define an interior zone between them, and a deck connected across the neck of each of the first member and the second member. In some embodiments, the bipod is a gravity-based structure which is ballasted to the sea floor. In other embodiments, the bipod is a piled structure. The interior zone defined by first and second members is maintained substantially free of ice and provides ready access to the sea surface for resupply or emergency egress of bipod personnel.
In a first embodiment, illustrated in
With attention now to
Base 211 comprises a flange having a plurality of holes to accommodate pilings 153 which are driven into the sea floor. While the piled bipod 200 rests on the seafloor 107, the weight of the piled bipod 200 is preferably carried by a plurality of pilings 153 that are driven deep into the seafloor 107 and then attached to the piled bipod 200. It is typical to drive the pilings 153 between about 35 and about 75 meters into the seabed to permanently fix the piled bipod 200 in its offshore location. The pilings 153 are typically strong, hollow tubes or pipe-like structures that act like long nails and provide a structurally efficient arrangement for a permanent platform for offshore hydrocarbon drilling and production operations. The pilings 153 have a relatively large diameter of between 1 and 3 meters with a wall thickness of about 2 to 10 cm. During installation of piled bipod 200, extensive preparation of the seafloor 107 is generally unnecessary since the weight of the piled bipod 200 is supported by the pilings 153. It is generally optional to provide granular material for leveling the installation site or to excavate muddy areas. Once the pilings 153 are driven into the seafloor 107 and firmly attached to the base 211, the pilings 153 provide resistance to: (a) forces that cause structures to slide along the seafloor, (b) forces that cause structures to overturn such as forces acting several meters above the base of a structure; and (c) forces that cause vertical movement both upwardly and downwardly. The resistance to both upward and downward motion or movement is important in resisting toppling forces that may be imposed by ice. The pilings 153 at the front side of the piled bipod 200 resist lifting forces that ice may impose on the upstream side to resist toppling over while the pilings 153 at the far side or back side or downstream side of the piled bipod 200 resist downward motion that would allow the back side to roll deeper into the seafloor 107. Using such long pilings provides a structurally efficient base for year around operations in an ice prone offshore ice environment that must resist ice loads that can be quite substantial. The pilings act like nails that hold the platform in place and are structurally more efficient than in the case of a GBS where resistance to overturning is provided only by the size and weight of the structure.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the ratio of the width of base 211 to the width of neck 209 is between 1.9 and 2.1 to 1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the width of base 211 to the width of neck 209 is between 2 and 3 to 1. In still further embodiments, the ratio of the width of base 211 to the width of neck 209 is between 1.5 and 2 to 1.
In some embodiments, the ratio of the width of angled portion 207 at shoulder 217 to the width of angled portion 207 at neckline 219 is between 1.9 and 2.1 to 1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the width of angled portion 207 at shoulder 217 to the width of angled portion 207 at neckline 219 is between 2 and 3 to 1. In still further embodiments, the ratio of the width of angled portion 207 at shoulder 217 to the width of angled portion 207 at neckline 219 is between 1.5 and 2 to 1.
In another embodiment, illustrated in
Gravity-based bipod 300 comprises deck 201 connected across a first member 303 and second member 305, each of which comprises a neck 209, angled portion 207, and base 307. The base 307 comprises a plurality of compartments 309 for ballasting; these compartments 309 are filled with heavy materials to provide sufficient weight to maintain the gravity-based bipod 300 in position.
Whether gravity-based or piled, the bipods presented herein provide numerous advantages over traditional monopod structures. First, the disclosed bipods allow for a significant time savings during installation at an offshore site. In arctic regions with limited warm months in which to conduct an installation, any time savings during the installation process is a major advantage. Here, the bipod provides a time savings because a jack-up can be used to pre-drill production wells after the first member is installed but before a second member or deck are installed.
Additionally, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the presented bipods are advantageously positioned to maintain interior zone 213 substantially free of ice buildup. As illustrated in
In yet further embodiments, bipod 600 includes mechanical devices 609 which assist in maintaining the interior zone 213 substantially free of ice build-up. In some embodiments, mechanical devices 609 are thrusters, propellers, or undersea fans affixed to one or more of upstream member 603 and downstream member 605. In some embodiments, mechanical devices 609 are positioned at or just below the sea surface, or just below the ice level. Mechanical devices 609 can be energized to provide thrusting power against encroaching ice or to clear interior zone 213 of ice. Mechanical devices 609 are configured to be operated remotely (e.g. by personnel on the deck of bipod 600 or even by personnel in remote locations), thus allowing for remote ice management of the interior zone 213.
The presented bipods further allow for advantages in manufacture, transport, and installation. Use of a bipod, rather than monopod, structure generally means that each member of the bipod will be smaller and lighter than the single member of a monopod. Thus, bipod members may be manufactured in smaller drydock or construction facilities, and transported more readily to installation sites offshore. Whereas some large monopods require specialized construction facilities, bipod members can be constructed in a wider range of facilities; for example, some large monopods require special dry docking facilities which bipod members would not. Once on site, bipod members have a smaller footprint than monopods and thus require less seafloor preparation, allowing for faster installation times. The overall result of a smaller, lighter, and more quickly installed offshore platform is generally one that is also less expensive than prior art gravity-based or piled monopods.
Finally, the presented bipods present advantages in the arrangement of the deck. As discussed above, monopods typically offer limited access to the seafloor through the narrow neck region (e.g. neck 111 of
It may be emphasized that the above-described embodiments, particularly any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments of the disclosure without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this application.
While the embodiments described herein are semicircular, split ellipses, hyperbolas, parabolas, as well as wedges are equally envisioned depending on the degree of variability with respect to the direction of movement of the floes, and other design considerations. Other examples are provided in
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any disclosures, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiment. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
This application is a utility of and claims priority to co-pending provisional application entitled “Offshore Bipod” Ser. No. 62/156,709 filed on 4 May 2015 the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3807179 | Stone | Apr 1974 | A |
4077225 | Lichtenberger | Mar 1978 | A |
4245929 | Pearce | Jan 1981 | A |
4253780 | Lecomte | Mar 1981 | A |
4505618 | Yashima | Mar 1985 | A |
4784526 | Turner | Nov 1988 | A |
4973198 | Cox | Nov 1990 | A |
8821071 | Aurora et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20120128434 | Shafer | May 2012 | A1 |
20140147214 | Foo | May 2014 | A1 |
20140147215 | Foo | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160326706 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62156709 | May 2015 | US |