This application claims priority of United States of America (U.S.) Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/007,029 filed Jun. 3, 2014.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The present invention relates generally to floating platforms that support sustainable energy producing mechanisms like wind, wave, solar, and tidal.
There are many reasons to locate sustainable energy creation devices offshore. Offshore wind is where the strongest winds in the world are located. Also, wave and tidal energy is located there. In calm conditions, the sun generally shines and with no trees or other shade-causing structures, solar energy generation should be a consideration. Thermal differences in water can also provide energy creation options. Offshore locations are not in anyone's back yard so there will be less public outcry due to noise, visibility, strobing effect, transmission lines, or property value impacts. Eminent domain issues can be minimized with offshore locations. Therefore, offshore locations are preferred for sustainable energy production.
There are many challenges with locating sustainable energy capture devices offshore. For example, a wind turbine embedded in the ocean/lakebed permanently is very expensive to build. Because it is permanent, lengthy permits need to be obtained which require lengthy studies to be completed, including geotechnical/foundation studies to determine how deep into the ocean/lakebed a tower must be embedded. For turbines embedded in the ocean/lakebed, the pieces used for construction are quite heavy.
Multi-megawatt (MW) wind power generation units generally have hub heights of around 285 feet (′) (86.9 meters (m)) and lifting large weights, 100 (90.7 metric tonnes (Mt)) to 300 tons (272 Mt), to this height requires large ships with powerful cranes to meet these demands. These large crane ships are very expensive. Because the crane ships are so expensive, there are few of them available at any given time to ensure the ships are fully utilized. This means wind energy capture devices must wait in a queue for maintenance. This lowers availability of the wind energy capture devices and lowers the economic viability of offshore wind energy production. People working at these heights also are put at significant safety risks.
Permanent wind energy capture devices located offshore can only be used for one purpose. This lack of functional flexibility also lowers the economic viability of sustainable offshore wind energy production.
Permanent wind energy capture devices located offshore can be damaged by ice flows/icebergs and destroyed. This level of risk is borne by offshore wind farm financiers and also lowers the economic viability of sustainable offshore wind energy production.
Large floating wind turbines that are assembled at dry dock and towed into position require large, specially built docks with cranes that can reach heights of over 300′.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,159,427 “Apparatus for Using Natural Energies” (Weidemann) discloses a floating system using a hull design like a ship, either singular or dual, that supports a superstructure that holds various kinds of natural energy capture devices such as multiple wind turbines.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,600 “Maritime Power Plant System with Processes for Producing Storing and Consuming Regenerative Energy” (Pflanz) discloses a floating system that creates energy from regenerative means above and below ocean waves like wind, wave, solar, chemical, and temperature. It can support multiple wind turbines, but unlike this invention, it does not disclose the type or means of floatation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,844 “Artificial Wind Turbine Island” (Lagerwey) discloses a floating system using a hull design like a ship, either singular or multiple, to support multiple wind turbines. It has the capability to rotate about a vertical axis to turn into the wind.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,075,189 “Offshore Wind Turbine with Multiple Wind Rotors and Floating System” (Heronemus) discloses a floating system of arrayed wind turbines for the purpose of producing hydrogen-based fuels far offshore. Various buoyant hulls are embodied, but none are similar to this invention.
US20120139255 “Technology for Combined Offshore Floating Wind Power Generation” (Zhu) discloses a floating system for supporting wind turbines and solar panels with wave/tidal capture devices attached to the octagonal frame. Each point of the octagonal frame has an independent corner floating unit. The connecting supports (8) float and have a plurality of independent chambers in it.
WO2014055027A1 “Floating Platform and Energy Production Plant” (Tunbjer) discloses floating or semi-submersible system for supporting wind turbines. It comprises at least three peripheral floating or semi-submersible units rigidly connected to a central floating or semi-submersible unit. The rigid connections can compress to capture wave/tidal energy.
This invention differs from prior art in that a barge has been designed to support sustainable power generation (exempli gratia (e.g.), wind, wave, solar, et cetera (etc.)) in a four-season, shallow (50′ (15.2 m) to 60′ (18.3 m) offshore environment with a plurality of configurable bays that support sustainable energy capture devices. The barge is round or mostly round with a plurality of peripheral bays that curve inward, opposite the barge's curvature, and where sustainable energy capture devices can be placed. The bays allow the sustainable energy capture devices to be easily removed for maintenance on site by support ships. The bays are positioned such that no undesirable elements (e.g. turbulence, shade, etc.) can sap energy from the other sustainable energy capture devices. The barge is buoyant and floats independently of the sustainable energy capture devices in each bay. The barge is hollow and its entire circumference can be traversed by the crew; safe from harsh environments. Ice challenges will be mitigated by its shape and aeration of the water around the outside of the floating barge. A central platform is contained within the barge by cables that may have wave energy capture devices installed. The central platform can be accessed by the crew through one or multiple floating walkways. Sustainable energy capture devices at the bays will float independently of the barge and may have wave energy capture devices on them at the bay-device interface.
In order to meet the demands unique to offshore sustainable energy farms, a floating barge has been designed with an all-encompassing, systems approach. The barge is an integral part of a sustainable energy creation system. The advantage of this is lower total costs and operating costs because the total costs of the project were considered during the design.
The barge is designed to operate in shallow waters about 55′ (16.8 m) deep as well as deep waters, support a plurality of sustainable energy capture devices, survive winters with pack ice, and be capable of supporting some sort of industry (e.g. industrial, recreational, residential, etc.). The advantage of this is better survivability and more available sites from which to choose for installing sustainable energy farms.
By being close to shore in shallow waters, shorter cables lengths are required to bring electricity to onshore customers. The barge will allow for a draft of between 25′ (7.6 m) and 45′ (13.7 m). This will allow it to be placed close to shore (2-5 miles). The advantage of this is lower total costs and operating costs than the current state of the art.
If the barge is placed hundreds of miles from the coast, energy generated on it may be used for the industry employed on the floating, central platform (Platform) (e.g. industrial, recreational, residential, etc.) or it may be transmitted to land through an underwater cable. The advantage of this is enhanced marketability and functional flexibility.
The barge has a plurality of bays on it. The bays allow the sustainable energy capture devices to be removed quickly for onsite maintenance. There can be a different sustainable energy capture device associated with each bay. Each one could be studied and evaluated in a natural environment in order to enhance each sustainable energy capture device's capabilities using real-world data. The sustainable energy capture devices are meant to be quickly and easily removed for fast, onsite service. This will lower maintenance downtime and increase the availability of the sustainable energy capture devices.
The barge will survive winters in pack ice by being round or mostly round. This will prevent ice forces from concentrating anywhere on the barge. It also has a common aeration system. Air compressors will push air through air hoses around the ship to air stones lowered down into the water that churns up warm water from below to the surface and agitates the water that, in turn, melts ice within close proximity to the barge. The advantage of this is lower operating costs and improved safety because there will be less damage to the barge each winter.
Optionally, wave energy capture devices will be deployed. Tensioned cables holding the Platform in place relative to the barge may each have a wave energy capture device to harness the horizontal component of wave energy as the Platform moves independently of the barge. Each interface between the bay and the sustainable energy capture device may have a wave energy capture device to harness the vertical component of wave energy as the sustainable energy capture device bobs differently in relation to the bay. The advantage of this is greater energy creation from a single unit.
The Platform has been integrated into the design to provide functional flexibility. The Platform will hold the step-up transformer. In the currently considered embodiments, the Platform will be approximately 79′ (24 m) to 450′ (61 m) in diameter or 0.11 acres (ac) (0.05 hectares (ha)) to 3.65 ac (1.48 ha) in area, but can be bigger given a location in deeper water. It may also hold some sort of industry (e.g. industrial, recreational, residential, etc.) that will utilize the energy generated on the barge. Depending on the demand from this industry, electricity may not be transmitted onshore. In this embodiment, the barge and Platform will act as a self-powered island. The advantage of this is greater marketing potential as a self-powered island with plenty of electricity and potentially free from government constraints because it is located hundreds of miles from the coast in international waters.
The barge is hollow and allows the crew access around the entire watercraft. This keeps the crew out of the elements and much safer than walking on top of it where wind and waves can create risky situations regarding safety. The barge's hollow nature also provides its buoyancy. If any or all of the multiple sustainable energy capture devices becomes disabled and sink(s), the barge will remain afloat.
The barge has bow and stern thrusters to more quickly position it into the wind for improved efficiency when there are wind turbines in the configuration. In winds too slow to align the barge with a weather front approaching from a different direction, thrusters are incorporated at each bay to align the barge. The thrusters are powered by stored electricity generated on the barge. The advantage of this is increased efficiency as it may take up to 45 minutes for the wind to “weathervane” or align the barge into the most efficient position while the thrusters could do the job in about 10 minutes.
The barge is attached to a mooring system that allows the barge to “weathervane” around the anchor. If the barge is too slow to move into place using the natural wind-catching capabilities of the design, wind vanes or fins may be added where necessary. In some embodiments, station-keeping may be computerized with the thrusters for increased efficiency.
The barge's design produces lower initial capital costs than permanently embedded sustainable energy capture devices in the ocean/lakebed. It also lays the groundwork for lower operating costs than the current state of the art by merging industry with sustainable energy generation. Initially, it can be used as a real-world test bed for various sustainable energy capture devices. Lessons learned from these types of studies will enhance the sustainable energy capture devices, further improving their economics. This invention will lower the cost of sustainable energy to consumers.
The position of the wind turbines relative to each other is fixed when locked in place at each bay. This reduces the wake effect where wind turbulence coming off the tips of each blade increases wind shear and reduces turbine efficiency on the downwind turbines. Also, with three lower turbines in the bow and four higher turbines in the stern, this positioning also serves to capture more air in the middle of the barge that aids in its “weathervaning” and increases airflow through the four back turbines.
If the barge needs to be relocated, support equipment can tow it to another location. The advantage of this is as political winds change, offshore wind may be outlawed in one country and welcomed in another and costs would be lower for relocation of this invention than for the current state of the art.
If the barge needs to be decommissioned, it can easily be removed leaving no trace or lasting impact on the environment. If local authorities require it, it can be sunk to provide an artificial reef after the sustainable energy generation devices are removed.
If one sustainable energy capture method is deemed unlawful by local authorities and it is currently in use, support ships can quickly change out the unwanted sustainable energy capture devices with those that are needed.
In the embodiment shown in
Barge: The floating, tubular, ship that is typically round or nearly round, but may be in any number of different configurations that support several sustainable energy capture devices at each bay and that has thrusters for station keeping.
Central Platform (Platform): A barge in the middle of the peripheral barge. It can be any shape that works effectively with the shape of the peripheral barge. In the embodiment shown in the figures, it is round where the peripheral barge is generally ring-shaped.
Bay: The location on the barge where the sustainable energy capture device is secured. The bay is a gap in the peripheral barge that is closed by an opposite-curving portion allowing the sustainable energy capture device to be removed.
Bow Bay: There are 3 front bays on the side of the barge considered the bow. The mooring cables may be attached on this side of the barge so the front bays are upwind of the back bays although any number of rigging configurations are possible.
Back Bay: There are 4 back bays on the side of the barge considered the stern. The back bays are downwind (wind direction 110 of
Sustainable Energy Capture Device: In the embodiment shown in
In
In
In
In
In
While values for dimensions, sizes and measurements have been provided in this specification for various components of the barge and the systems making up the barge, it should be understood that such values are for purposes of description and example only. Actual values may vary greatly depending on the particular designs chosen while still being within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Electric cables run from each bay (7) to the “Central Platform” (4) to the “Step-up Transformer” (5) and along the rigging to the anchor, eventually being laid on the ocean/lakebed leading to land and the substation and/or customers.
The invention is to be manufactured of aluminum onshore in about 10 pieces that are sealed and buoyant. The pieces will be transported to a dock and attached to support ships. The support ships will tow the pieces to the site. Once at the site, the first two pieces will be quickly bolted together. The third through ninth pieces will then be bolted to the predecessors one at a time and the partially assembled “Barge” (6) will be moved, or rotated, to allow space for the next piece to be moved into place. It is held in place by the support ships.
The “Central Platform” (4) parts will then be loaded onto supports ships, taken to the site and assembled through the remaining gap in the “Barge” (6). Next, “Tensioned Cables” (9) secure it to the “Barge” (6) and the appropriate number of “Platform Access Walkways” (3) are installed then the “Barge” (6) is closed by bolting on the tenth pieces, closing the ring. The invention is then connected to the rigging.
The seals are then broken so the “barge” (6) can be welded together at each connection. Air bladders will then be placed under the bolted areas of each piece and inflated to lift the “Barge” (6) above the water in order to weld it together.
It is anticipated that efficiencies will be discovered as the installation process is performed repeatedly. The pieces may be sealed or not, bolted together in the water, on the support ships, or in dry dock. It is desired to transport the unit to the site as quickly as possible and install it as quickly, simply, and safely as possible.
Each sustainable energy capture device will be assembled onshore, as completely as practicable, transported to the dock, loaded onto a support ship, and towed to the site for installation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3029608 | Perkins | Apr 1962 | A |
3522709 | Vilain | Aug 1970 | A |
3758788 | Richeson | Sep 1973 | A |
3938343 | Lamy | Feb 1976 | A |
4159427 | Wiedemann | Jun 1979 | A |
4188157 | Vigander | Feb 1980 | A |
4285614 | Lamy | Aug 1981 | A |
4472084 | Boon | Sep 1984 | A |
4631921 | Linderfelt | Dec 1986 | A |
4792290 | Berg | Dec 1988 | A |
6100600 | Pflanz | Aug 2000 | A |
6294844 | Lagerwey | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6749399 | Heronemus | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766643 | Christensen | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6860219 | Dempster | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7075189 | Heronemus | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7156037 | Borgen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7156586 | Nim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215036 | Gehring | May 2007 | B1 |
7242107 | Dempster | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7293960 | Yamamoto | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7352078 | Gehring | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7508088 | Kothnur | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7629703 | Storbekk | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7726911 | Dempster | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7948101 | Burtch | May 2011 | B2 |
7994649 | Abatemarco | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8030793 | Garvey | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057127 | Lopez | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8096116 | Draper | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8169099 | Roznitsky | May 2012 | B2 |
8197208 | Sharples | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8405242 | Borden | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8471399 | Lefranc | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8484964 | Preftitsis | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8578586 | Yamamoto | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8624416 | Wille | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8662793 | Wong | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8664795 | Borden | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8801332 | Elazari-Volcani | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8803346 | Pitre | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875805 | Advocaat | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8878381 | Henry | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8956103 | Gehring | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9003631 | Yamamoto | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9080554 | Royseth | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9163607 | Tabe | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20030168864 | Heronemus | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050134050 | Salls, Jr. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060165493 | Nim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171798 | Yamamoto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060261597 | Gehring | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001464 | Kothnur | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070120371 | Gehring | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138021 | Nicholson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080036213 | Storbekk | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080231053 | Burtch | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240864 | Belinsky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090162144 | Ayre | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196748 | Salter | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100050500 | Pieraccini | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116684 | Sawyer | May 2010 | A1 |
20100194115 | Jakubowski | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219645 | Yamamoto | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230965 | Pitre | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244450 | Tabe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278630 | Yamamoto | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110037264 | Roddier | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049992 | Sant'Anselmo | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110206466 | Rawles, II | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110285136 | Desmeules | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140245941 | Haider | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290233 | Hine | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140367969 | Pitre | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150175246 | Huang | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150204302 | Kalnay | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150211477 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |