When an offshore hydrocarbon reservoir appears to have potential, an initial or early production system of limited cost may be set up which produces moderate amounts of gas and oil. The initial production system can be useful to see whether the reservoir has the potential to produce large amounts of hydrocarbons and therefore justify an expensive production facility. The initial production facility also may be useful to produce substantial revenue during the period of time when a larger facility is being designed and installed. Until about 15 years ago, only oil was considered valuable, and steps were taken to get rid of the gas. One approach was to flare the gas (burn it). Another approach was to compress the gas and inject it into a disposal well. A third approach was to compress the gas and export it via a subsea pipeline, but that disposal approach was available only if there was a customer close enough to make it economical to build the seafloor pipeline. More recently, the advantage of natural gas in producing less local pollution and in producing less carbon dioxide than oil or coal has been realized, and it is now common to export natural gas by long distances by cooling it (below −161° C.) so the gas becomes liquefied. The gas is carried a long distance by tanker in the form of LNG (liquefied natural gas). Applicant notes that as LNG, natural gas takes up a space that is 600 times smaller than the space that would be occupied by the same amount of natural gas at atmospheric pressure. However, facilities for cooling natural gas to produce LNG, storing and handling the LNG and then reheating the LNG, are usually not available during early testing and production. A low cost system and method for utilizing the limited amounts of natural gas that are available during early testing and production, which may last several months to a few years, would be of value.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a method and system are provided for the economical utilization of gaseous hydrocarbons that are produced during testing and early production at an offshore hydrocarbon reservoir. In a system where production of hydrocarbons is made through a production vessel that is connected through a riser to a well head at the sea floor, considerable amounts of produced gas is stored under pressure in at least one gas tank on the production vessel. The system also includes a shuttle vessel, or shuttle, which repeatedly sails to the location of the production vessel where it receives the stored pressured (compressed) gas, and sails away to a site where the compressed natural gas can be profitably sold, as where it is pumped into a distribution pipeline or into a storage tank to power equipment.
In one method, the pressured gas in a first tank on the production vessel can be passed through a conduit (e.g. a hose or loading arm) to a second tank on the shuttle. In another method, the first tank, which holds pressured gas, is transferred by a hoist to the shuttle. A third tank, which is empty and which was carried by the shuttle, is transferred to the production vessel to take the place that was occupied by the first tank that was transferred from the production vessel to the shuttle.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention will be best understood from the following description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The system 10 of
Applicant provides a shuttle vessel, or shuttle 40, which repeatedly comes to the vicinity (within 0.5 kilometer) of the production vessel 20, receives pressured gas (gas at a pressure of a plurality of bars, or at least 30 psi) which is unloaded from tank(s) 32 on the production vessel. The shuttle stores the pressured gas in a tank(s) 42 on the shuttle, and carries the pressured gas to a distant location (a plurality of kilometers away) where the pressured gas is unloaded. As mentioned above, if gas is stored as LNG then 600 times as much gas can be stored in a given volume as gas at atmospheric pressure (15 psi). If gaseous gas is stored at a high pressure such as 1000 psi, then about ten times as much gas can be stored as LNG in a given volume than can be stored as high pressure gaseous gas. However, as mentioned above the use of LNG involves a large investment at the production site (as well as the receiving or consuming site or facility).
The transport of pressured gas from the early production site 44 where the well head 24 is located, has an important advantage, that pressured gas can be unloaded by the shuttle to a consuming facility at low cost because the pressured gas does not have to be heated as does LNG. Also, the shuttle carries far less gas than does an LNG tanker, so many more potential customer exist who can receive and use limited amounts of gas, including customers closer to the production site than exist for LNG. The shuttle 40 carries on the order of magnitude of 10,000 standard cubic meters of gas (gas at atmospheric pressure), as compared to an LNG tanker which carries more than ten or one hundred times as much and which generally delivers its load only to a large facility such as a special port near a major city that can quickly unload, store, reheat, and sell to customers the huge amount of LNG unloaded from the tanker. Applicant notes that 10,000 standard cubic meters at 240 bar is about 10 to 20 days of gas production by the production vessel, so offloading is done about every 10 to 20 days (i.e. 5 to 40 days).
In the figures, a tank filled with hydrocarbons (gas or oil) is indicated by the presence of shading, while an empty tank is indicated by the absence of shading. In
In
In
In one example, each tank such as 32 has a length and width of six meters each, and a height of three meters, for a volume of 108 meters3. The tank holds methane at a pressure of 16 Bars (1000 psi). The production vessel and shuttle each transport two tanks filled with gas (and two filled with oil) having a mass of 500 tons, by a distance of 50 kilometers to a customer. An LNG terminal to be built later at that site uses a tanker to carry 50,000 tons of LNG in each trip.
Thus, the invention provides systems for the early production of hydrocarbons from an offshore reservoir, which effectively produces and distributes gaseous hydrocarbons and usually also oil. Produced gas is stored in tanks on the production vessel as pressured gas. The pressured gas is offloaded to a shuttle, which transports it to a distant facility where the pressured gas is offloaded (as is oil). One way to offload the gas is to pass it through a hose or the conduit of a loading arm, to a tank on the shuttle. The pressure of gas stored in the tank on the production vessel is used to move some of the gas to the tank on the shuttle, and a separate pump is used to move the rest. Another way to offload the gas is to move one or more entire tanks that each contains pressured gas, from the deck of the production vessel to the deck of the shuttle. The shuttle can include a barge on which gas tank(s) are stored and a separate tug boat for moving the barge, or for leaving the barge stationary with the tanks thereon being used for storage.
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated herein, it is recognized that modifications and variations may readily occur to those skilled in the art, and consequently, it is intended that the claims be interpreted to cover such modifications and equivalents.
Applicant claims priority from U.S. Provisional patent application No. 61/144,999 filed 15 Jan. 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4375835 | Archer | Mar 1983 | A |
5025860 | Mandrin | Jun 1991 | A |
5477924 | Pollack | Dec 1995 | A |
5549164 | Blandford | Aug 1996 | A |
6230809 | Korsgaard | May 2001 | B1 |
6250244 | Dubar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6345672 | Dietzen | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6517290 | Poldervaart | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6698989 | Snowdon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702539 | Snowdon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709216 | Snowdon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709217 | Snowdon | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6745856 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796379 | Martin | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6973948 | Pollack et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7017506 | van Wijngaarden et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033124 | Snowdon | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066219 | Poldervaart et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7119460 | Poldervaart et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7174930 | Poldervaart et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186062 | Snowdon | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7506702 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7544018 | Snowdon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7628224 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7673577 | Poldervaart et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7975769 | Pollack et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020134455 | Emblem et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030051875 | Wilson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040238176 | Appleford et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060283590 | Poldervaart et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2009124372 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100175884 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61144999 | Jan 2009 | US |