Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Be it known that we, Frederick T. Varani and Paul B. Trost, both citizens of the United States of America, have invented new and useful improvements in an oil-gas tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system using a variable volume gas bag connected with a control switch as described in this specification. We claim benefit of the U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/926,180 filed on Jun. 20, 2007.
The present invention relates to oil and gas vapor collection systems and, more specifically to an oil and gas vapor collection, storage and recovery system using a variable volume gas bag connected with a control switch.
Production tanks typically are a source of hydrocarbon vapors emitting into the atmosphere. Various systems are available for collection oil and gas vapors. Recently, the Colorado Department of Health has adopted regulations limiting emissions from production tanks. Depending on temperature, color of production tank, orientation to the sun, and gravity of the contained liquids, coupled with the normal separator operations, the amount of vapors may vary from minimal to in excess of 4 mcfd. Typically these vapors have a very high BTU content. Capture and beneficial usage of these vapors, as opposed to flaring, is both economically and environmentally advantageous. The present system ensures that no air or oxygen leakage into the production tank occurs when gauging and/or emptying the tank, plus provides a constant reservoir-type storage system by utilizing a variable volume, at a constant pressure, to minimize the compressor cycling and simultaneously accommodating rapid influxes of liquids and/or vapors into the tank. Thus, when the separator dumps or the plunger lift system adds significant volumes of both volatile oil-condensate, as well as the associated highly volatile gases, the surge of gas is accommodated by the present system. The gas is temporarily stored in an expandable gas storage bag which accommodates hydrocarbons. The bag collapses, like an accordion, when very little gas is present, but expands rapidly, and under minimal pressure of water column pressure of approximately 1 to 2 inches, to contain the surge of gas. As the bag expands, the bag actuates a switch when turns a compressor on. The compressor, in turn, compresses the contained gas and into the pipeline. As the bag decompresses and shrinks, a switch is activated to turn off the compressor. Thus, the present system allows the oil storage tank to operate at a constant pressure, but the gas storage bag accommodates variable gas volume.
The benefits of the present system include the recompression of gas for pipeline injection or re-injection into the well bore; use of gas for the oil-water separator, or heater treater and/or as an energy source for Ajax-type engines, as opposed to purchase of propane; and on-site produced water evaporation, thereby cutting water disposal costs. In addition, the system can operate without electrical service to the tank battery, which is convenient and eliminates the labor and costs of installing an electrical source for the tank. Payback for the system is site-specific, however, for a condensate production tank, payback is projected at 2.5 years.
As such, the general purpose of the present oil-gas condensate tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system which has all of the advantages of the prior art mentioned heretofore and many novel features that result in an oil-gas condensate tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system which is not anticipated, rendered obvious, suggested, or even implied by the prior art, either alone or in combination thereof.
An object of the present system is to provide gas recompression for pipeline injection or re-injection into a wellbore.
Another object of the present system is to use gas recovered by the present system for a tank-associated oil-water separator, heater treater, and/or as an energy source for an Ajax-type engine.
Yet another object of the present system is to eliminate the need to purchase and install a source of propane.
Still another object of the present system is to provide on-site produced water evaporation, thereby cutting water disposal costs.
Even still another object of the present system is to operate without electrical service to the tank battery.
Still yet another object of the present system is be cost-effective.
Even yet another object of the present system is to reduce the escape of vapors and the associated BTU content into the environment.
Thus has been broadly outlined the more important features of the present system so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated.
These together with additional objects, features and advantages of the present oil-gas condensate tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of presently preferred, but nonetheless illustrative, embodiments of the present oil-gas condensate tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In this respect, before explaining the current embodiments of the present system in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustration. The invention is capable of other examples and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. It is also to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the concept of this disclosure may be readily utilized as a basis for the design of other structures, methods, and kits for carrying out the several purposes of the present oil-gas condensate tank vapor collection, storage, and recovery system. It is therefore important that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Objects of the present system, along with various novel features that characterize the invention are particularly pointed out in the claims forming a part of this disclosure. For better understanding of the present system, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its uses, refer to the accompanying drawings and description.
Another component of the present system 10A is the control system 40. A bag position indicator switch 37 operates the gas engine throttle 29. When the bag 20 is high, which indicates a large amount of gas is stored, the engine 27 operates at high speed and compresses the excess gas into the receiving pipeline 80. When the gas bag 20 goes low, which indicates that the headspace 30 gas is depleted, the engine 27 runs slowly and very little gas is compressed into the pipeline 80. This control system 40 consists of a plurality of mechanical linkages 47 between the bag 20 and engine throttle 29 and is either pressure-operated or electric-operated.
The wells usually do not have electricity available, so an additional benefit of the present system is the addition of a small generator, which is also powered by the headspace 30 gas engine to allow electric controls to be used at the wells.
An alternative to the foregoing system components, which is shown in
The control system 40 for the booster compressor 35 consists of a bag position switch 37 which directs the wellhead gas 42 to the gas booster compressor 35 thereby activating the compression process. When the bag 20 is high 22, which indicates a large amount of gas stored therein, the gas booster compressor 35 operates at high speed and compresses the excess gas into the receiving pipeline 80.
When the gas bag 20 goes low 24, which indicates that the headspace 30 gas is depleted, the bag position switch 37 directs gas into the bag 20 to prevent the bag 20 from going completely empty.
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/926,180 filed on Jun. 20, 2007
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 947437 | Ellis | Jan 1910 | A |
| 1327999 | Hill | Jan 1920 | A |
| 1705792 | Vignere | Mar 1929 | A |
| 2459317 | Granberg | Jan 1949 | A |
| 2634681 | Rowell | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2895305 | Reed | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2947379 | Aubrey | Aug 1960 | A |
| 3234879 | Brown | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3247798 | Glasgow et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3450162 | Mercier | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3493001 | Bevandich | Feb 1970 | A |
| 4422301 | Watt et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4579565 | Heath | Apr 1986 | A |
| 5135360 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5139390 | Rajewski | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5367882 | Lievens et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5651389 | Anderson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 6209651 | Knight | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 7326285 | Chowdhury | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7350581 | Wynn | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 20100158717 | Vogt | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60936180 | Jun 2007 | US |